southerncross

Wanted Missing VOR Skipper

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, EvaOdland said:

Well some sort of line was of drawn in something that resembles sand in a flooding tide...a process developed, tested, hated, condemned, rejected, ignored, forgotten... 

The tether light is off and you are now free to swing your dicks about the cabin.

 

 

image.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, random said:

Fucking funny how the WS process and those involved in it has been bagged relentlessly here.  But now they will all be good.

 

image.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MR.CLEAN said:

fixed.

I'll be he knows the BBC's postal address off by heart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SOSOS said:

I'll tell you why I think Witt is wrong in this case and would be wary of letting my daughter anywhere near him (not that you asked). The issue to me is not whether he was crass but that he was doing it from a position of power on the boat and that the woman who it was directed at (or near) was below him in the pecking order. Had she been the owner and he the bowman, he can say whatever he wants and she can kick him off the boat if she's offended. In this circumstance, whether she's offended doesn't matter and if she is she's stuck putting up with it for another 1000 miles at least. The power structure is what most sexual harassment issues stem from, not what was said.

And yet those of your elk find it completely acceptable that your children are taught at school that it is fine for boys to use the girls toilet and encouraged to try homosexuality. And You are so proud of your views that you use a sock puppet to post them. 

Grow a pair.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, LB 15 said:

 

image.jpg

 

The hearing has come and gone ... but this stench is still here!

Screenshot from 2017-12-06 14-56-16.png

  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EvaOdland said:

 

:face palm: 

:sigh:

:face palm:

omg...

 

What's your problem?

I will make sure that she knows she is equal or even better than men and that she can do anything she sets her mind to. But I don't want her mind fucked up by a man hating femisist misandrists.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, LB 15 said:

And yet those of your elk find it completely acceptable that your children are taught at school that it is fine for boys to use the girls toilet and encouraged to try homosexuality. And You are so proud of your views that you use a sock puppet to post them. 

Grow a pair.

I’m thinking of patenting the latest in forum technology, how does the LB15 TrollSniffer sound?

We might to review that name, it needs a good acronym, that’s the secret. 

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Quote

"For Volvo, they have to sell cars and trucks. Around half of the world's population is female so if you have more females in the race, they have more attention for their products.

 

Yes this has serious implications for Volvo in the market place. Volvo station wagons are the number one choice of soccer mums worldwide - not just for their  great safety record but for their spacious interiors, having plenty of room up front for the kids, and the Labrador and  room in the back for the groceries and pick up hubbies beer on the way home.  tough yet stylish enough to drop hubby of at the yacht club in. Great rear view mirror for touching up the makeup before picking up hubby. Remember girls he has worked hard all week so make that extra effort so both the car and you are looking at your best when you go to get him and his mates from the pub. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, LB 15 said:

 

Yes this has serious implications for Volvo in the market place. Volvo station wagons are the number one choice of soccer mums worldwide - not just for their  great safety record but for their spacious interiors, having plenty of room up front for the kids, and the Labrador and  room in the back for the groceries and pick up hubbies beer on the way home.  tough yet stylish enough to drop hubby of at the yacht club in. Great rear view mirror for touching up the makeup before picking up hubby. Remember girls he has worked hard all week so make that extra effort so both the car and you are looking at your best when you go to get him and his mates from the pub. 

Well played!

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, random said:

 

The hearing has come and gone ... but this stench is still here!

Screenshot from 2017-12-06 14-56-16.png

Welcome to the Randumb breakfast show....we were going to talk about how to apply cream to Randumb's tiny balls but he just wants the skipper to give them a sniff. He seeks attention in strange ways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the things that has come out of this is despite some saying the rule 69 process is deeply flawed and even some healthy scepticism, the system actually worked rather well. A complaint was made, there was  no cover up, the complaint was properly examined and it was dismissed. Whatever you think of Dawn Riley and anybody else who filed a complaint, I think they would have had far more grounds for real complaint about if their case had not been investigated at all, which is what I think many would have preferred. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Team_GBR said:

One of the things that has come out of this is despite some saying the rule 69 process is deeply flawed and even some healthy scepticism, the system actually worked rather well. A complaint was made, there was  no cover up, the complaint was properly examined and it was dismissed. Whatever you think of Dawn Riley and anybody else who filed a complaint, I think they would have had far more grounds for real complaint about if their case had not been investigated at all, which is what I think many would have preferred. 

If they react like this for every complaint, the IJs will retire rich and some races will be bankrupt in a years time. 

  • Like 2
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Team_GBR said:

One of the things that has come out of this is despite some saying the rule 69 process is deeply flawed and even some healthy scepticism, the system actually worked rather well. A complaint was made, there was  no cover up, the complaint was properly examined and it was dismissed. Whatever you think of Dawn Riley and anybody else who filed a complaint, I think they would have had far more grounds for real complaint about if their case had not been investigated at all, which is what I think many would have preferred. 

I think it’s a difficult rule but it’s also nice to have it. 

I also think that the teams will have it in mind and think things through, they will all try to avoid getting protested. So Dawn Riley and everybody else who agreed with her will have made an effect. And that’s ok. 

Hopefully the effect won’t be that all we get is boring videos...but if I was Witt now, I’d upload a couple of videos of them just eating, not saying anything. Vendée style (its late, I don’t remember the old mans name but he was hilarious). Just to make a little fun about this rather serious matter :) 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, jack_sparrow said:

Fuck no one sent a ambulance to Dawn's house.

Why?  The point has been made.  The video is still there.  The sea-bogan has been highlighted for what he is and will no doubt be more careful about the content of his breakfast shows now.

No one seriously believed that anything more than ask for an apology would have been requested anyway.

  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, NORBowGirl said:

but if I was Witt now, I’d upload a couple of videos of them just eating, not saying anything. Vendée style (its late, I don’t remember the old mans name but he was hilarious). Just to make a little fun about this rather serious matter :) 

That would be pretty funny and if the took an entirely different "very proper" tact in the whole thing.

"I say Witt, old man, would you mind passing the salve for the dangly bits?"

"Oh, certainly, 'ol sport.  Spot of tea with that?'

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, random said:

Why?  The point has been made.  The video is still there.  The sea-bogan has been highlighted for what he is and will no doubt be more careful about the content of his breakfast shows now.

No one seriously believed that anything more than ask for an apology would have been requested anyway.

No one seriously believed anything you posted. Witt has been exonerated, your side of the discussion lost and common sense has prevailed. Time now for you to return to your more sensible crusades like proving that the republican party flew the planes into the world trade center and that the sea level is rising. 

Arseclown.

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So to all those that wanted Witt's head turn your anger to the SA Editor..! 

Quote Front Page "

Thank christ cooler heads prevailed in the ludicrous VOR Rule 69 protest lodged against Scallywag was dismissed. As we understand it, Dawn Riley (and perhaps others) filed a complaint at the World Yacht Racing Forum last week about said “incident”. That went to World Sailing, as there is a new procedure for all WS sanctioned events, where basically anyone can file a complaint and it has to get investigated.

That’s what happened here. As we understand it, nobody involved in this edition of the race, from VOR to the teams, etc. filed a complaint.

Now let’s hope this gives pause to the politically correct, hand-wringing people who want to over legislate this sport to their nanny state ideal. Get back to sailing and quit worrying about what “bad words” other people are saying. Especially when it has nothing to do with you, Dawn Riley. "

I'd say well said..! WTF is the world coming too..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the Volvo logo. Clearly the strong association with the male symbol drives soccer mums crazy with desire. Chicks dig a mans man.

New-Volvo-Logo-emblem.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, random said:

Why?  The point has been made.  The video is still there.  The sea-bogan has been highlighted for what he is and will no doubt be more careful about the content of his breakfast shows now.

No one seriously believed that anything more than ask for an apology would have been requested anyway.

giphy.webp

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dee and Witt formed a sort of bond while battling it out at the back.  There's even a video somewhere of Dee suggesting they get a drink when it was over to catch up and compare notes.

Good thing for Witt it seems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Christian said:

Maybe you need to get over yourself.  

Already is all over himself.........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, jack_sparrow said:

 

giphy (3).gif

I have ordered one ambulance for both of them, then going to the same institution.

The end result might be a lot of fun, or not... 

Image result for tantrum baby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, hoppy said:

I hope my daughter will be open minded and not have her head messed up by left wing feminist teachers.

 

1 hour ago, hoppy said:

What's your problem?

I will make sure that she knows she is equal or even better than men and that she can do anything she sets her mind to. But I don't want her mind fucked up by a man hating femisist misandrists.

Sorry, but I am losing you here.

As I read it you say you don't want your daughter's mind fucked up by YOU.  Surely, I am reading this wrong ?

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Team_GBR said:

One of the things that has come out of this is despite some saying the rule 69 process is deeply flawed and even some healthy scepticism, the system actually worked rather well.

It has actually shown the system is busted and in bits. The sailing community, many who wouldn't know a 69er if they fell over it until now, have collectively had a "what the fuck moment".

Hopefully, though probably unlikely this also extends to World Sailing. Surely, even for them the penny dropped has dropped and they have come to the realisation that they can't gallop around the world fucking with people's rights, thinking they are immune from the laws of the land. In this case putting people's livelehoods on the line off the back of unrelated 3rd party frivolous complaints.

I await with interest to see if Dawn Riley has the guts to stick her head up above the parapet now and justify her actions with a bunch of weasel words.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jack_sparrow said:

I await with interest to see if Dawn Riley has the guts to stick her head up above the parapet now and justify her actions with a bunch of weasel words.

Am looking forward to it !!!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LB 15 said:

Volvo station wagons are the number one choice of soccer mums worldwide

LB since when did they start calling Pussywagons ..Volvo Station Wagons?

unnamed (10).gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the thing about Swedes preferring to get laid in their cars is on account they don't trust their handiwork with their IKEA beds and the leftover bits.

images (43).jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, jack_sparrow said:

It has actually shown the system is busted and in bits. The sailing community, many who wouldn't know a 69er if they fell over it until now, have collectively had a "what the fuck moment".

I have a very different take on it.You need to be really dumb if you don't think that WS has a process or rules against bringing the sport into disrepute and therefore rule 69 should come as no surprise, even if you haven't heard of it before.Every other sport I know has such clauses (English football managers manage to fall foul of this sort of rule all the time at press conferences!). What everybody now knows is that there is a system and it works. The evidence for it working is that it dismissed the case.

19 minutes ago, jack_sparrow said:

Hopefully, though probably unlikely this also extends to World Sailing. Surely, even for them the penny dropped has dropped and they have come to the realisation that they can't gallop around the world fucking with people's rights, thinking they are immune from the laws of the land. In this case putting people's livelehoods on the line off the back of unrelated 3rd party frivolous complaints.

3rd party complaints, when it is about something like a video placed in a public domain, are not unreasonable and need to be allowed. Consider an extreme situation (that will not happen). The OBR records crew members having sex and that is posted. Nobody involved with the race does anything. Surely a 3rd part complaint would be reasonable. If you accept that impossible and mildly absurd case at one end of the spectrum and what you call a 3rd party frivolous complaint at the other end, surely there has to be a place for 3rd party complaints.

Then the question is who decides the complaint is frivolous.  That decision must be seen to be made in a fair and reasonable manner and I cannot see how that can be done by one person with no legal training. In other words, you do need an IJ. Also, in this case, while I don't personally think this situation warranted a rule 69 sanction, I don't find it frivolous as it related to what is acceptable for public broadcast. This case was made harder because from what has been said, i do not believe that the complaint came from just one person. Press reports suggests at least one other besides Riley, while pub talk suggests there were 4 or 5 complaints.

I don't believe that WS had any other option but to convene an IJ to look at it. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Team_GBR said:

I have a very different take on it.You need to be really dumb if you don't think that WS has a process or rules against bringing the sport into disrepute and therefore rule 69 should come as no surprise, even if you haven't heard of it before.Every other sport I know has such clauses (English football managers manage to fall foul of this sort of rule all the time at press conferences!). What everybody now knows is that there is a system and it works. The evidence for it working is that it dismissed the case.

3rd party complaints, when it is about something like a video placed in a public domain, are not unreasonable and need to be allowed. Consider an extreme situation (that will not happen). The OBR records crew members having sex and that is posted. Nobody involved with the race does anything. Surely a 3rd part complaint would be reasonable. If you accept that impossible and mildly absurd case at one end of the spectrum and what you call a 3rd party frivolous complaint at the other end, surely there has to be a place for 3rd party complaints.

Then the question is who decides the complaint is frivolous.  That decision must be seen to be made in a fair and reasonable manner and I cannot see how that can be done by one person with no legal training. In other words, you do need an IJ. Also, in this case, while I don't personally think this situation warranted a rule 69 sanction, I don't find it frivolous as it related to what is acceptable for public broadcast. This case was made harder because from what has been said, i do not believe that the complaint came from just one person. Press reports suggests at least one other besides Riley, while pub talk suggests there were 4 or 5 complaints.

I don't believe that WS had any other option but to convene an IJ to look at it. 

so you said,

and said, 

and said, 

and said....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Team_GBR said:

I have a very different take on it...

But first do you mind coming back to us on that when you have your car up and going.

images (44).jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like our old mate Lite Boy chucked a tanty.  Seems that he has started throwing his toys out of the pram.

Added about 20 downvotes in minutes!  Thx mate, I take that as a badge of honour.

image.png.a03b9e2d92fc83f971c1aa807559427d.png

  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Team_GBR said:

 

  That decision must be seen to be made in a fair and reasonable manner and I cannot see how that can be done by one person with no legal training. In other words, you do need an IJ.

Questions of sexual harrassment should be decided by people with no legal training other than their sailing judging?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually Jack they don't gallop round the world, they only get involved (as I understand) when it is a World Sailing sanctioned event. For example when David Witt faced a Rule 69 hearing in Hong Kong regarding a open 'club race' World Sailing had no involvement.

Just saying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 06/12/2017 at 12:13 PM, Team_GBR said:

Seriously, WTF do International Jurors in the sport of sailing know about this sort of thing? It doesn't matter what your view of the rights or wrongs of this case, the people deciding it are unlikely to have any experience in the matter making the whole process a farce.

The Flip and the Flop...

2 hours ago, Team_GBR said:

One of the things that has come out of this is despite some saying the rule 69 process is deeply flawed and even some healthy scepticism, the system actually worked rather well. A complaint was made, there was  no cover up, the complaint was properly examined and it was dismissed.

You were dead right first time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, MR.CLEAN said:

Questions of sexual harrassment should be decided by people with no legal training other than their sailing judging?

What? Using the word scrotum in a silly skit is sexual harassment? If AB said the word uterus in a skit would she be sexually harassing the guys? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RKoch said:

What? Using the word scrotum in a silly skit is sexual harassment? If AB said the word breasts in a skit would she be sexually harassing the guys? 

Better equivalent.  Can be viewed clinically or sexually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, MR.CLEAN said:

Questions of sexual harrassment should be decided by people with no legal training other than their sailing judging?

Questions of actions that bring disrepute to the sport of sailing should be handled by whom?

  1. conduct that is a breach of good manners, a breach of good sportsmanship, or unethical behaviour; or
  2. conduct that may bring the sport into disrepute.

I'd say that the committee was appropriately staffed to look at the above. 

 

  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, shanghaisailor said:

Actually Jack they don't gallop round the world, they only get involved (as I understand) when it is a World Sailing sanctioned event.

I was being metaphoric Shang... WS rules encompass the world in the context of my comment they are being applied and enforced with disregard to other laws. For instance the 49'r girl and her discrimination case, this being in my mind anyway a workplace matter etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the Neanderthals are still bleating the same as they were before the hearing.

Rationally most know that Witty crossed the line, but they need to form a circle jerk to reassure each other that it is OK to hold the line, talk each other up, have a hug-and tug.

Calm down boys, the sky has not fallen for the rich old white cunts, it's just fractured, that's all.

  • Downvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, RKoch said:

What? Using the word scrotum in a silly skit is sexual harassment? If AB said the word uterus in a skit would she be sexually harassing the guys? 

I think the correct term would be 'taint'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, MR.CLEAN said:

Questions of sexual harrassment should be decided by people with no legal training other than their sailing judging?

I agree Mr Clean. Some rules hearings are all about SAILING RULES, even most Rule 69 hearings.

However, when a case is not, for example, an incident on the race course involving one or two boats then surely, just as in a 'normal' court of law, experts should be called upon.

SS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jack_sparrow said:

I was being metaphoric Shang... WS rules encompass the world in the context of my comment they are being applied and enforced with disregard to other laws. For instance the 49'r girl and her discrimination case, this being in my mind anyway a workplace matter etc.

Now I see your point

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Fiji Bitter said:

 

Sorry, but I am losing you here.

As I read it you say you don't want your daughter's mind fucked up by YOU.  Surely, I am reading this wrong ?

Ha ha

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So when does the breakaway world sailing organisation start?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MR.CLEAN said:

Questions of sexual harrassment should be decided by people with no legal training other than their sailing judging?

Was this a case about sexual harassment or was it about whether a crass skit brought the sport into disrepute?   If it was the former, I agree with you and had made that point before, but if it was the latter, which is what I believe they really ruled on, isn't an IJ as good an authority as any? In other sports, it is usually a committee of "elders" who rule on this sort of thing, so sailing seems no different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, random said:

Looks like the Neanderthals are still bleating the same as they were before the hearing.

Rationally most know that Witty crossed the line, but they need to form a circle jerk to reassure each other that it is OK to hold the line, talk each other up, have a hug-and tug.

Calm down boys, the sky has not fallen for the rich old white cunts, it's just fractured, that's all.

No little flower the hearing has shown that the only line that witty crossed was the finishing line. I hope my little downvoting fun didn't contribute to this meltdown you are having. Why are you taking this so hard - you are always wrong and everyone already knew you were an arseclown...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, SCANAS said:

So when does the breakaway world sailing organisation start?

I heard a rumour that the rich old white cunts that have been posting here are forming a "men only" MWS.

Their patron is already lined up.

Edit: I'm preparing a release for the FP.

  • Downvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A kind soul sent me this link to a Yachting World report on the protest being dismissed. This interesting extract and a titbit at the end is highlighted for the benefit of the handwringers and or interlectually challenged.

"The video incident is not the first time David Witt has been at the centre of controversy. Before the race he was widely quoted as saying that he planned to sail with seven men only, because he considered the crew allocation rules a ‘social experiment’.

Before the race start in Alicante, Witt told Yachting World he was “100 per cent misquoted”, adding: “What I said was, I think the rule is terrible, that I’m not supportive of the rule. I think it’s ridiculous there’s a boat left in the shed and there’s not an all-women in the race.

“I’ve had women sailing on my boat for the last 15 years, and there are more women sailing in this race that have sailed with me in campaigns outside the Volvo Race than any other person in the race.”

http://www.yachtingworld.com/news/misconduct-charges-dropped-against-volvo-ocean-race-skipper-while-navigator-steps-down-111350#FfMYZBJCIqAhscqc.99

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, jack_sparrow said:

“What I said was, I think the rule is terrible,

Hahahahaaaaa.

Yeah right, that sounds like Witty .... ah you think?

100% misquoted ... bullshit.

  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Team_GBR said:

Was this a case about sexual harassment or was it about whether a crass skit brought the sport into disrepute?   If it was the former, I agree with you and had made that point before, but if it was the latter, which is what I believe they really ruled on, isn't an IJ as good an authority as any? In other sports, it is usually a committee of "elders" who rule on this sort of thing, so sailing seems no different.

No I think the purse clutches have taken the right for sports to deal with this kind of shit away from themselves. In matters like this that could have real world legal consequences any offended snowflake that is unhappy with the sports outcome will be encouraged by a lawyer to take it to a real court crying they were denied procedural fairness (as it is know here). Next thing you know the sport is on the cover of the newspaper and the real damage to the sport begins. The biggest risk to participation from this matter is heaps of young girls not taking up sailing because of the number of pussified snowflakes they see commenting.

A rare win for commonsense! Stick that up your arse Randumb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Honkers local press are impressed with David.  Bet his backers were stoked to get the press coverage though.

“A lot of the other teams are taking one or two girls, and I think that’s Volvo doing a social experiment, and I’m pretty sure I know what the outcome will be and I don’t really want to be part of it."
 
Do we have another 100% Misquote here Jacky-boy?
  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, albanyguy said:

Not sure if this has been posted in this thread yet. If not then quite relevant

 

Done to death mate.

Not sure if you have caught up with the thread, but the protest had nothing to do with anyone being offended.  Someone considered Witty's actions were bringing the sport into disrepute.

Please try to keep up.

  • Downvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Team_GBR said:

Was this a case about sexual harassment or was it about whether a crass skit brought the sport into disrepute?   If it was the former, I agree with you and had made that point before, but if it was the latter, which is what I believe they really ruled on, isn't an IJ as good an authority as any? In other sports, it is usually a committee of "elders" who rule on this sort of thing, so sailing seems no different.

About time some sanity arrived.

Seems that even a journalist working for SA can't understand the concept you have just explained so well.  Fuck knows I have tried and failed.

Well done mate.

  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No Random I don't follow the thread 24/7 unlike others in this place, like yourself. I do have a life outside of this place and come here for the comic relief, especially that provided by your prime adversary. He's been on a good roll lately and long may it continue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, random said:

Fuck knows I have tried and failed.

Indeed fuck does. Everyone knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, olaf hart said:

I was looking forward to a full hearing and Witt pleading the skiff sailor defence....

Yes we cut our skiffle mates some slack as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Random,

I am looking at upgrading my wife's Volvo. I advised Volvo of this issue and told them unless what I consider to be a trivial and overblown issue was dumped, I wanted nothing to do with their brand. 

They rang me to let me know the outcome . 

Wasnt that a despicable act, using commercial influence on the sponsor as a means to put my view across? Thought I'd let you know so you can be morally disgusted with me. 

Thank god you aren't in my sailing scene, none of us would be game to say a word for fear of upsetting your moral principles, which seem to be completely out of kilter with my reality at least. 

Cheers,

SB 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, shaggybaxter said:

Random,

I am looking at upgrading my wife's Volvo. I advised Volvo of this issue and told them unless what I consider to be a trivial and overblown issue was dumped, I wanted nothing to do with their brand. 

They rang me to let me know the outcome . 

Wasnt that a despicable act, using commercial influence on the sponsor as a means to put my view across? Thought I'd let you know so you can be morally disgusted with me. 

Thank god you aren't in my sailing scene, none of us would be game to say a word for fear of upsetting your moral principles, which seem to be completely out of kilter with my reality at least. 

Cheers,

SB 

 

 

Maybe Randumb can be convinced to leave the bay and do next years 70 B2G race? It would make the piss up even more fun than usual. Maybe we can get him to stick around for the Mad Monday lunchon. If he is in by then of course. He may have to rush off to protest the fleet for not having holding tanks passing Lady Elliot green zone. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Random can you please change your profile "Captain Goodvibes"would be very disappointed that such a person as you are besmirching his reputation.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok ok you have finally convinced me.

The only way to deal with possible sexual harassment is to claim that 'she liked it'.

The appropriate response to the women who protested is to say that 'she has a fat ass'.

Edit: and no body likes her, everyone says so.

Keep up the good work guys!  Fucking awesome stuff your female fiends and family are proud of you I'm sure.

  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, random said:

Ok ok you have finally convinced me.

The only way to deal with possible sexual harassment is to claim that 'she liked it'.

The appropriate response to the women who protested is to say that 'she has a fat ass'.

Keep up the good work guys!  Fucking awesome stuff your female fiends and family are proud of you I'm sure.

you have plenty of time to think about your misogynistic ways ,  while sailing your RC 1/2ksb on the local pond . you may even get a high five from another troll on shore after he see's the trim of your jib boom !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But she fucking liked it!  She put the beard on and shit!  I'm sure that the fact that Witty was the boat boss and could sack her if she didn't laugh at his jokes had absolutely nothing to do with her cooperation.  That's bullshit!  Keep up the good work guys awesome stuff.

And how the fuck can Dawn Riley be taken seriously when she has a fat ass?  I mean seriously!  I didn't realise that before, thanks guys!

  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we please get back to sailing? Today is the in-port and Sunday leg 3 then maybe we can discuss what this site is supposed to be all about.

See ya on the water!

Just sayin

'SS

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, random said:

But she fucking liked it!  She put the beard on and shit!  I'm sure that the fact that Witty was the boat boss and could sack her if she didn't laugh at his jokes had absolutely nothing to do with her cooperation.  That's bullshit!  Keep up the good work guys awesome stuff.

And how the fuck can Dawn Riley be taken seriously when she has a fat ass?  I mean seriously!  I didn't realise that before, thanks guys!

And the full meltdown is finally happening.
Took a while though - probably the effect of LB's downvotes. Snowflakes don't deal well with that :lol:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No I have H'd TFU.  She liked the beard.  She just forgot the script, that's why she could not speak.

Dawn has a fat ass and no one likes her, everyone is saying so.  How can on unliked women with a fat ass be taken seriously.  I mean who gives a fuck if she sailed around the world once or twice.

Keep up the good work guys, awesome stuff.

  • Downvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But she fucking liked it!  Every one here is saying that.

  • Downvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, random said:

Done to death mate.

Not sure if you have caught up with the thread, but the protest had nothing to do with anyone being offended.  Someone considered Witty's actions were bringing the sport into disrepute.

Please try to keep up.

randumb are there power blackouts interrupting your treatment or has Nurse Ratchet got the voltage dialed up too high??

Dawny is Offended by Incident > Dawny tells RO (& WYRF Audience) > RO Tells VOR EDIO > EDIO Investigates > EDIO concludes a IJ R69 Disrepute Hearing Req’d > EDIO advises IJ > IJ Convene > IJ Declare Incident is horseshit > randumbs head explodes
 

electro.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I was wrong.  I have to admit that I had no idea that AB liked being humiliated, who would have thought?

And WTF was I thinking, being on the same side as a women with a fat arse?  I mean seriously, just because Dawn has done a volvo or two, who does she think she is?  Does she think she knows better than the rich old white guys here?  What a joke.

WTF was I thinking?  I offer my apologies for what I have done in defence of female sailors of the future.  Keep up the good work guys and keep me posted on the breakaway male only WS group.

  • Downvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LB lucky you were on the spot to capture randumb turning into roman candle...will there be a funeral..will Dawn be there to make a speech, will she reveal she had an affair with randumb and his last days of agony after a botched gender operation in Thailand?? So many questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, random said:

 I offer my apologies for what I have done in defence of female sailors of the future.  

uGpu7Rw.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The evidence is so overwhelming it cannot be ignored.

AB 'liked it'.  'Your honour she liked it.'  Can't argue with that can you.

Clean said that no one likes Dawn and she has failed at her job.

Ed says that Dawn has a fat arse.

How can I ignore that brains trust.  I'm convinced, no one can take any notice of a fat arsed women that every one hates, who fucking cares if she has done a Volvo or two?

I'm good now.  Thanks guys.

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, random said:

The evidence is so overwhelming it cannot be ignored.

AB 'liked it'.  'Your honour she liked it.'  Can't argue with that can you.

Clean said that no one likes Dawn and she has failed at her job.

Ed says that Dawn has a fat arse.

How can I ignore that brains trust.  I'm convinced, no one can take any notice of a fat arsed women that every one hates, who fucking cares if she has done a Volvo or two?

I'm good now.  Thanks guys.

You must have missed this one.

Reposted for your convenience.

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites