Offshore 1

Larry's AC50 Circus

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, WetHog said:

Why?  From what I've read the AC50's will be faster than the JC75's and more maneuverable.  5-8 AC50's ripping around a course would be pretty impressive to see.  They won't overshadow anything AC related but they won't be forgotten either.

WetHog  :ph34r:

Correct, they won’t overshadow the AC in the sense of massive crowds, broadcasts, attention, history, all of that.

But for those of us who love the extreme edge of course-racer boatspeed that Ellison’s AC era ultimately produced, it will be terrific if these boats reach yet another level of performance. The suggestion it is being delayed into ‘19 may be a sign of even bigger ambitions on that front than the original notion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More time for them to push their BS Alternative America's Cup narrative on other gullible 'pimp my town' mayors I guess. Might even work - unless it's the General Dr involved again :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, sclarke said:

The AC75's are scheduled for launch next year...2019. No doubt, at least one will be launched in that time. Once the 75's are launched, and the cycle is under way, the 50's will be forgotten. 

Wow, you really are a real hater ....it's comical, clearly obsessed ... and desperate for it not to succeed aren't you?
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Stingray~ said:

Correct, they won’t overshadow the AC in the sense of massive crowds, broadcasts, attention, history, all of that.

They won't overshadow the AC in the sense of history, but they could about massive crowds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Tornado-Cat said:

They won't overshadow the AC in the sense of history, but they could about massive crowds.

The biggest ACWS crowd ever was in Naples, an event LR won, it was pretty cool.

This new series could also attract local interest in nice locales on beautiful weekends but: Crowds are likely not a big factor behind why the AC50 NextGen series is getting funded by infinite-money LE and whoever else. It has to be all about a passion for pressing the limits in sailing performance.

Those seeing ‘spite’ as motive are surely small-minded spiteful people themselves.

$B’s don’t waste their fun-money on silly shit like malice. They do it mostly just for fun - and good on them no matter the yachting style, J’s or otherwise. These boats will very likely be extremely hot!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MischiefBDA said:

Wow, you really are a real hater ....it's comical, clearly obsessed ... and desperate for it not to succeed aren't you?
 

 

Not a Hater, but you're right, I don't want it to succeed, but my reasons are absolutely logical, unlike the arguments for the series.

Because if it goes ahead:

1) its a series born of spite

2) Because its piggybacking the Americas Cup, using Americas Cup technology, and boats built for the express purpose of competing in the Americas Cup, so should remain an Americas Cup Class.

3) The AC50's should not be "watered down" to become mediocre one design racers. No other class has been able to successfully make a box rule class yacht better/ faster while at the same time making it one design.

4) This a personal one: because all of the hate ETNZ/ LR got from the "Haters" regarding "not toeing the company line" and being "Argumentative" and "Going against the majority" The one thing they did do, despite all the attempts by Oracle and its organising Committee to weaken the NZ Team, is continue to contest the AC and win it to get what they wanted. Now the shoe is on the other foot, and after all the (Hollow) talk of "Sustainability" and signing a Framework that would ensure "Sustainability" instead of challenging to win it back, it's ok to lose, quit, and take your ball and go home? and instead throw a few hundred million at an alternative series using Americas Cup Class Boats? 

5) Because Foiling Catamarans aren't a new, and novel thing any more. There are many foiling catamarans/ Multihull series currently being competed in. Even the Olympics are foiling now.

6) You say Billionaires aren't stupid...well it seems they are if they decide to fund this series, because there is no return on their investment. 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a crock of shit

1 minute ago, sclarke said:

Not a Hater Yes you are  but you're right, I don't want it to succeed, but my reasons are absolutely logical, No they aren't unlike the arguments for the series.

Because if it goes ahead:

1) its a series born of spite Wrong.You really aren't up on sailing history. A series like this was first proposed by Coutts back in 2007. Now he has the opportunity to do it. Artemis is also a major mover in the series because they love the boats. Why would TT be acting out of spite?

2) Because its piggybacking the Americas Cup, using Americas Cup technology, and boats built for the express purpose of competing in the Americas Cup, so should remain an Americas Cup Class. You expect people to simply pack up old AC boats and never use them again? That's stupid. Old AC boats have been used after their time in the AC since the dawn of time. Why is this different? Also, the technology is not owned by the AC. Teams created it. Oracle created the rule.

3) The AC50's should not be "watered down" to become mediocre one design racers. No other class has been able to successfully make a box rule class yacht better/ faster while at the same time making it one design. It's not being watered down. Exactly the opposite, from what I have heard. They might be one design, but they are being turbo charged. They will be significantly faster than the fastest at the AC.

4) This a personal one: because all of the hate ETNZ/ LR got from the "Haters" regarding "not toeing the company line" and being "Argumentative" and "Going against the majority" The one thing they did do, despite all the attempts by Oracle and its organising Committee to weaken the NZ Team, is continue to contest the AC and win it to get what they wanted. Now the shoe is on the other foot, it's ok to lose, quit, and take your ball and go home? You seem to think that once a wealthy owner has been involved with the AC, that's all they should do. There is life after the AC. This series is so different from anything to do with the AC. The AC is a design competition. The fastest boat wins. It is that simple. The challenge is how a team works together to build a faster boat than everybody else. this series is about finding out which team are the best sailors by pitting them against each other in equal boats.

5) Because Foiling Catamarans aren't a new, and novel thing any more. There are many foiling catamarans/ Multihull series currently being competed in. Even the Olympics are foiling now. So what? There is no other foiling cat that can sail around a course on foils 100% of the time. The olympic foiling cat is a dog. Even the best foiling series at the moment, the GC32's, look boring and pedestrian compared with the AC50's. If you really think that the AC50 series would be like any other racing, it proves how clueless you are.

6) You say Billionaires aren't stupid...well it seems they are if they decide to fund this series, because there is no return on their investment. Possibly the single most stupid statement from you. What return do they get from any series? Nobody has ever got a return out of the AC. Larry has spent over $500m on the cup. How much do you think TT spent on Artemsi over 2 cycles? Whjere was the return for them, or for most other super rich AC backers? You could argue that the best a team has ever done is break even, as in the case of teams that are and need to be fully sponsored such as ETNZ. There is no return on investment from the AC, or any other type of sailing.

The costs of this series is going to be small change for the wealthy guys owning the teams. It will be a fraction of the cost of an AC campaign. It gives a purpose for boats that would otherwise sit around doing nothing and it gives jobs to sailors who have become personal friends of some of the team owners.For an owner what's not to like? Relatively affordable racing in the fastest, most spectacular racing boats in existence with a group of sailors you consider friends.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ just should not be called  AC anything.  Otherwise they are piggy backing!

oops wasn't going to post on this thread!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, A Class Sailor said:

What a crock of shit

The costs of this series is going to be small change for the wealthy guys owning the teams. It will be a fraction of the cost of an AC campaign. It gives a purpose for boats that would otherwise sit around doing nothing and it gives jobs to sailors who have become personal friends of some of the team owners.For an owner what's not to like? Relatively affordable racing in the fastest, most spectacular racing boats in existence with a group of sailors you consider friends.

1) Torbjorn Tornquist has had a history of disappointing challenges in the AC, the first was a disaster, and the second was a disappointing challenge with a history of under achieving.

TT may "love the boats" but he's never been able to master any of them, his AC72, AC45F and the AC50 campaigns all proved to be disappointing, under achieving campaigns.

2) Do I expect people to simply pack up old AC boats? Yes, its the nature of the Americas Cup. You win, you decide what happens next, Its whats happened with every cycle in recent history, OR win the cup, so you don't need to pack them up! Everyone else has done it, so they should too. All they have to do is WIN so that they don't need to pack them up! Just as ETNZ have done! 

Turbo charged? According to who? I'll believe it when I see it, because no class has been able to turbo charge any One design concept. Turbo charge often means Big budget.

"This series is so different from anything to do with the AC" Except they're using AC Class Boats (Albeit modified).

"this series is about finding out which team are the best sailors by pitting them against each other in equal boats" So is the GC32, the MC32, the TP52, and the RC44. There is one team who is "the best" in an AC50 Class, and they have the silverware to prove it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, sclarke said:

Turbo charged? According to who? I'll believe it when I see it, because no class has been able to turbo charge any One design concept. Turbo charge often means Big budget.

I seem to remember they did pretty well turbo charging the AC45's. There are other examples of classes turbo charging one designs. The Tornado did a pretty good job of it. Nacra have done it. The Flying Phantom is a turbo charged F18. The list is long. Stop talking shit!

It's also pretty easy to make the AC50's go faster, for 2 reasons. The first is that if you are making them all the same, you don't need to worry about the original AC50 rule for the foils. That makes a huge difference.  Then there will be an automated flight control system so that the sailors don't need to try to match the numbers like ETNZ did. Instead of giving a target for the settings, they will simply happen. The other thing is that they now know what works and what doesn't. If you think they cannot unpackage what we saw on the ETNZ boat and improve on it, particularly with the removal of rule limitations, it is yet more evidence you don't understand boats.

As for budget, what is needed to make these boats faster (turbo charged) is different foils and foil systems. The biggest cost of new foils is in the R&D and then making the tooling. Spread that over the fleet and it becomes significantly cheaper. Same with the control system, although now they have a pretty good idea of what they are doing. 

You make it sound hard and expensive. If you spend the same amount as an AC team on foil and foil control development, spread that over say 5 teams. This doies not need a full AC design team working for the whole AC cycle. It is a small subset team (say 4-5) working for 6-9 months and then it is over to the boatbuilders. It really isn't a big bill and it is more than affordable for these guys to end up with the fastest raceboats. Even if they each threw $5m into the pot ($25m in total) which is pocket change when you are that wealthy, you would give you a bigger development budget for those items than any AC team had last time.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, sclarke said:

To be successful, the AC50's need to have capitalised on the momentum of AC35. Once the 36th cycle is underway, the momentum from Bermuda will have ceased or will be very minimal. The AC72's were IMO a lot more spectacular than the AC50's and just as fast as it turned out,

in only one way, the top speed. try racing the two boats, see what happens... even downwind when they were both foiling, the ac50 would beat the 72, top speed means shit, especially when it is only hit once in a blue moon, the only way that the two boats could be competitive is a downwind drag race so don't say that they were similar speeds.

but once the 34th cycle ended, the AC72's were all but forgotten, and were considered "Dinosaurs" once the AC50's were launched.

because the ac50's were faster and brought more intense racing

The 90 footers of AC33 were amazing when they were launched and raced in Valencia, but again, once the 72's were launched they were all but forgotten as well.

because they were also replaced by faster boats that were more manoeuvrable and brought better racing

 If the 90 footers, and the AC72's, as spectacular as they were (and they were absolutely spectacular) are forgotten so easily, a small 50 foot catamaran will suffer the same fate, especially given the fact that they are apparently going to be modified to one design.

i disagree, while the 75 will be great to watch you'd have rocks in your head to think that they will be as manoeuvrable or as fast around a course. there is a slim chance that they will hit faster top speeds than any of the cats, but it will probably be in higher winds and will probably be hit in training when the relatively heavy boats build some momentum and actually get going. i think while sailing fans may enjoy a more original design that may not be as fast as before, the general public just wants speed, close action and foiling manoeuvres which is something that the ac50 will bring to the table. in no way will this series make a dent in the ac though, the ESS did nothing to hurt the AC when it went foiling and i think that this will be very similar

Foiling is no longer a new concept, it is no longer novel to see foiling cats zipping around a course, and there are already series that display foiling catamarans, so the 50's need to add something different. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, sclarke said:

Not a Hater, but you're right, I don't want it to succeed, but my reasons are absolutely logical, unlike the arguments for the series.

Because if it goes ahead:

1) its a series born of spite

 

 

 

 

Maybe you're right. You certainly are full of spite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, pusslicker said:

Maybe you're right. You certainly are full of spite.

Oh no, not this crap again. Fuck off clown!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can understand the position that the AC50 series will launch into obscurity, though I am not sure I agree.

I can understand the position that an AC50 series might detract from attention on AC36, though I definitely don't agree.

I don't see how anyone can possibly believe both of those things, though it seems a few do.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no problem, they probly can't call it an AC50 series cause it has fuck all to do with AC. 

Airy Hellisons Fuck ya America Cunts 50 ft (almost) World series of the World.

AHAC50

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, inebriated said:

i disagree, while the 75 will be great to watch you'd have rocks in your head to think that they will be as manoeuvrable or as fast around a course. there is a slim chance that they will hit faster top speeds than any of the cats, but it will probably be in higher winds and will probably be hit in training when the relatively heavy boats build some momentum and actually get going.

And you got rocks in your head if you think you know anything about the new AC boats or their top speeds. Only a few folk have looked at the sims,

and you aren't one of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, barfy said:

And you got rocks in your head if you think you know anything about the new AC boats or their top speeds. Only a few folk have looked at the sims,

and you aren't one of them.

do you think that they will be faster around a course?

or even faster in a straight line

sure, they will have more RM with the leeward foil further outboard and the windward foil wheighted (although the ac50 could neg the windward ridder [however this can be discounted due to the added drag ])

similar aero from what we can imagine

heavier boat to get up onto the foils so it will take longer to get them ripping (unless whomper foils are used which shaves off top speed)

i think it is safe to say that foil tacks will be tricky at best, with probably consistent foil jibes, which amplifies the issue of a boat that is harder to get foiling because it will need to happen multiple times upwind if foil tacks are not acheived

the main will not be as versatile in de-powering and flattening out as the wingsail is, so probably not as efficient at the higher ends, or just shit at getting the boat foiling

sure, i haven't seen the sims yet, but from what we can look at, the only thing that i can seem going for this boat is the RM

so would you agree that it seems unlikley that these boats will be faster around a course??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, barfy said:

And you got rocks in your head if you think you know anything about the new AC boats or their top speeds. Only a few folk have looked at the sims,

and you aren't one of them.

I know 2 people who has seen and been running sims. Both believe that in certain conditions the AC75's will be quicker than the AC50's, downwind in terms of headline speed, but they think the 75's will be no quicker VMG downwind. They do not believe they will be faster around a course, although that depends on where the course is set because the 75's have to be able to sail in waves which the 50's never did.In most conditions, the 75's will be slower than the 50's.

2 hours ago, inebriated said:

i think it is safe to say that foil tacks will be tricky at best

Foiling tacks will happen, but far higher up the wind range than on the 50. What makes it really tricky is not having as much control over the soft wing as they had over the hard wing. The soft wing adds significantly more drag in tacks.

 

2 hours ago, inebriated said:

(although the ac50 could neg the windward ridder [however this can be discounted due to the added drag ])

Not sure what you are saying here. on the 50's, rudder delta to get extra righting moment was used by all. They only had a 3 degree range, but that is enough to gain a reasonable and worthwhile amount. I am surprised that we haven't seen it on any beach cats like the A's. They also gained righting moment from the top of the wing by inverting it. This could only be done in certain conditions, but it made a big difference as well.

The biggest challenge the 75's have is the soft wing. It cannot do the things that the hard wings did on the 50's. The ability to make the bottom fuller so they could depower up top or even invert it was something very special and which cannot be done on a soft wing.

You don't need to see the sims to have a pretty good idea of the key differences between the AC50 and 75. What people sometimes seem to miss is the similarities. Once foiling, the 75 might as well be a cat because that is how the numbers add up. What ETNZ have created is a foiling monohull that sails like a cat. For me, it's the ultimate irony. While people celebrate the return to monohulls, we have something very different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/18/2018 at 8:55 AM, WetHog said:

Not sure Clean is necessarily wrong.  To do a series like this the right way a mid to late 2019 start is appropriate.  Mid 2019 would make it summer in the northern hemisphere.  The sweet spot calendar wise for a series like this.

Having said that, until 5+ AC50's take the starting gun in race 1 of this series its all wishful thinking.  I"ll believe it when I see it.

WetHog  :ph34r:

This thing could find audiences and teams - all Larry has to do is spend the $15-20 million every year to pay for it, plus subsidies for the (nearly all) teams who can't afford to pay for it.  Hell, Oracle had to subsidize teams in the big AC - there will obviously be more of that in this Louis Vuitton Cup, especially since they will be barred from using the words "America's Cup' in any commercial communication or marketing at all.

 With that budget, a good team could make it work, could grow it, could make it as successful as the Extremes or even more so.  As long as that media/marketing/PR money keeps rolling in, it will continue to draw moderate crowds online and in person, and would be considered a good success in the sport.

The second Larry gets angry at how much he has to spend (which is generally around 13 months after he decides to spend it, based on the past two AC cycles and his constant harping on funds), the series is a memory.  

Any sponsor suckered into paying big bucks to be part of it is going to walk away a year or two later with a bleeding asshole and probably leave the sport.  

Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MR.CLEAN said:

This thing could find audiences and teams - all Larry has to do is spend the $15-20 million every year to pay for it, plus subsidies for the (nearly all) teams who can't afford to pay for it.  Hell, Oracle had to subsidize teams in the big AC - there will obviously be more of that in this Louis Vuitton Cup, especially since they will be barred from using the words "America's Cup' in any commercial communication or marketing at all.

 With that budget, a good team could make it work, could grow it, could make it as successful as the Extremes or even more so.  As long as that media/marketing/PR money keeps rolling in, it will continue to draw moderate crowds online and in person, and would be considered a good success in the sport.

The second Larry gets angry at how much he has to spend (which is generally around 13 months after he decides to spend it, based on the past two AC cycles and his constant harping on funds), the series is a memory.  

Any sponsor suckered into paying big bucks to be part of it is going to walk away a year or two later with a bleeding asshole and probably leave the sport.  

Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.

 

 

Yeah except that according to the Italian press that is what they are doing.

And will no doubt keep doing, until they get a cease and desist letter from RNZYS - if anyone can be bothered.

Spite Cup - Fuck Yeah.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The longer they wait, the less likely it becomes, especially with 2020/ 2021 being so busy with Olympics and the Americas Cup. They seem to be relying on the Olympic Sailors to carry it. If they don't do it next year, which looks highly unlikely, its not happening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, nav said:

Yeah except that according to the Italian press that is what they are doing.

And will no doubt keep doing, until they get a cease and desist letter from RNZYS - if anyone can be bothered.

Spite Cup - Fuck Yeah.....

link to italian press saying that Larry is using the AC trademark?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think this event has any thing of "spite", it was a sport event organized as a long term business opportunity with all possibilities under control, even if the winning team did not use the same boat.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MR.CLEAN said:

link to italian press saying that Larry is using the AC trademark?

Moving the goal posts a bit there....but here you go

http://m.larena.it/territori/garda-baldo/louis-vuitton-cup-più-che-un-sogno-per-la-fraglia-vela-1.6435910

If you want to know precisely what was said and not said and how the "AC Alternative" is being promoted you could put your journalistic hat on and ask President Testa in the little town on Lake Garda. Or anyone else involved....might be an interesting story in there somewhere?

You could also find out who holds the rights to footage from AC35 and the use of the AC50 designation - good on ya ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, aren't ETNZ the current holders of the Louis Vuitton Cup? They haven't been defeated for it since San Francisco. Are they expected to relinquish it? Awkward situation for any future winner, given the last team who won it were never defeated for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, sclarke said:

Wait, aren't ETNZ the current holders of the Louis Vuitton Cup? They haven't been defeated for it since San Francisco. 

Valencia. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Wolkenzug said:

Valencia. ;)

They won it in Valencia and defended it in San Francisco.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sclarke said:

Wait, aren't ETNZ the current holders of the Louis Vuitton Cup? They haven't been defeated for it since San Francisco. Are they expected to relinquish it? Awkward situation for any future winner, given the last team who won it were never defeated for it.

I doubt it will be awkward for anyone. You're just projecting again. Professional sailors aren't going to give this a second thought you petty little fuck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, pusslicker said:

I doubt it will be awkward for anyone. You're just projecting again. Professional sailors aren't going to give this a second thought you petty little fuck.

Sure, what ever you say. You should stop lying to yourself and change your name to c**ksucker because that's what you are. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sclarke said:

 Awkward situation for any future winner, given the last team who won it were never defeated for it.

It would be even more akward to win a cup from a team who had been defeated, isn't it ? :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Tornado-Cat said:

It would be even more akward to win a cup from a team who had been defeated, isn't it ? :rolleyes:

Wouldn't be awkward at all, if you were the team who defeated them to win that cup. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, sclarke said:

Wait, aren't ETNZ the current holders of the Louis Vuitton Cup? They haven't been defeated for it since San Francisco. Are they expected to relinquish it? Awkward situation for any future winner, given the last team who won it were never defeated for it.

If I recall correctly, RNZYS/ETNZ own at least 3 Louis Vuitton trophies: Louis Vuitton Pacific Trophy, Louis Vuitton Trophy, and Louis Vuitton Cup.

They'll just knock up the Louis Vuitton Sour Losers' Consolation Cup

5ad90bc94fe35_consolationcup.jpg.27de59f2dbd93f8241003a0ad5e1c76a.jpg

To go with their AC35 badges..

5ad90bf688857_Thanksforshowingup.jpg.59cbdaad1b003ff7aa70022651cd84d0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sclarke said:

So Ian Burns isn't involved in any AC50 series design team. This thing looking less and less likely.

https://www.ausleisure.com.au/news/ian-burns-sets-goal-for-ais-to-be-world-leader-in-sport-technology/

The designs could be largely complete by now since the builds at Core are already underway, it’d be no surprise if Fresh has added Design input.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Stingray~ said:

The designs could be largely complete by now since the builds at Core are already underway, it’d be no surprise if Fresh has added Design input.

Are they underway? Surely he'd stick around to make sure his designs actually work? or are built properly? Or if they need alterations he could oversee them? I don't buy that all the design work is done, so thats it for him, the builds are underway so he can go. You'd think Larry would retain him until the whole job is complete?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, sclarke said:

Are they underway? Surely he'd stick around to make sure his designs actually work? or are built properly? Or if they need alterations he could oversee them? I don't buy that all the design work is done, so thats it for him, the builds are underway so he can go. You'd think Larry would retain him until the whole job is complete?

Surely you’re right. The designs won’t work, nothing Core builds ever gets built properly, alterations are inevitable, the whole design job is incomplete, and the fastest boats ever built will simply never happen.

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, sclarke said:

Wait, aren't ETNZ the current holders of the Louis Vuitton Cup? They haven't been defeated for it since San Francisco. Are they expected to relinquish it? Awkward situation for any future winner, given the last team who won it were never defeated for it.

The LV Cup isn't a challenge cup so it doesn't matter. What you are trying to say makes no sense. You seem to be claiming that if the last winner of a regatta doesn't defend their title and doesn't return the trophy, whoever wins isn't really the winner.

In case you were unaware, Louis Vuitton own the rights to the name Louis Vuitton Cup. They can use it for whatever they want. It's worth remembering that most people associate the Louis Vuitton Cup with top class, high quality sailing events. Without knowing what the event is, which would most sailors recognise as being more prestigious? The Louis Vuitton Cup or the Prada Cup.

Louis Vuitton lends a high degree of credibility and prestige to the event. While I don't think the owners are putting together the series out of spite, I am pretty sure Louis Vuitton is sponsoring it out of spite, seeing how poorly they have been treated by ETNZ. When ETNZ needed them, LV was there to sponsor the LV Pacific Series, an event that kept ETNZ in business. I bet they are delighted at being cut out of this round of the AC. It's worth remembering that a lot of people, including Grant Dalton, were outraged at how Ernesto Bertarelli treated LV. I guess what goes around, comes around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Stingray~ said:

Surely you’re right. The designs won’t work, nothing Core builds ever gets built properly, alterations are inevitable, the whole design job is incomplete, and the fastest boats ever built will simply never happen.

:D

I'm saying the AC50's are built on the edge, and most if not ALL of the key designers involved in both cycles (San Francisco and Bermuda) involving Multihulls are either working on AC36 or doing other things. The Majority of AC Sailing teams are committed to the next cycle. Any design team would've had to have started either as soon as ETNZ crossed the finish line, or very shortly after, as even though from the outside, the boats may have looked very similar, the control systems and board shapes would have been vastly different. The control systems, as well as boards would have to have been re-designed, tested and validated in under a year. Boats rounded up,  purchase agreements/ leases signed, designers put on retainers, and deals signed for shipping each boat and accompanying containers shipped around the world. An impressive feat considering most of the AC teams were either taking time off, thinking about doing the next Americas Cup, or signing contracts for the Volvo Ocean Race. I mean, come on, it really doesn't have much going for it anymore. But hey, you can always hope. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, A Class Sailor said:

The LV Cup isn't a challenge cup so it doesn't matter. What you are trying to say makes no sense. You seem to be claiming that if the last winner of a regatta doesn't defend their title and doesn't return the trophy, whoever wins isn't really the winner.

In case you were unaware, Louis Vuitton own the rights to the name Louis Vuitton Cup. They can use it for whatever they want. It's worth remembering that most people associate the Louis Vuitton Cup with top class, high quality sailing events. No, most people associate Louis Vuitton with the Americas Cup. Without knowing what the event is, which would most sailors recognise as being more prestigious? The Louis Vuitton Cup or the Prada Cup. The Americas Cup. Any challenger trophy whether it be the LV Cup, or the Prada Cup, is a stepping stone to the main prize. 

Louis Vuitton lends a high degree of credibility and prestige to the event. And yet, when they sided with GD and ETNZ, most were trashing them and wanted them gone, because Red Bull represented the new Extreme vision for the AC, and LV represented the "Old Rich Boys Club" now they represent "prestige" haha While I don't think the owners are putting together the series out of spite, I am pretty sure Louis Vuitton is sponsoring it out of spite, seeing how poorly they have been treated by ETNZ. How do we know ETNZ have treated them badly? As far as I know, it was LV who decided it didn't make sense from a business standpoint, as Prada (a business Competitor) played a more important role as organisers of the Challenger Series. When ETNZ needed them, LV was there to sponsor the LV Pacific Series, an event that kept ETNZ in business. And an event that kept competitors interested while Oracle were busy excluding the challengers in court. I bet they are delighted at being cut out of this round of the AC. I bet they're not! It's worth remembering that a lot of people, including Grant Dalton, were outraged at how Ernesto Bertarelli treated LV. I remember Ellison being outraged at Bertarelli also, and I also remember Ellison doing all the things he was outraged at Bertarelli for doing. It seems they've both suffered the same fate, and are now on the outside looking in. While Dalton and Bertelli are now calling the shots. I guess what goes around, comes around.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, sclarke said:

The Majority of AC Sailing teams are committed to the next cycle.

Not very good at Maths, are you. There were 5 teams last time around. 2 are going again. 2 out of 5 is not the majority. Even if you say that LR is an AC sailing team, which it wasn't last time, that makes 3 out of 6 which is still not a majority.

 

6 minutes ago, sclarke said:

I'm saying the AC50's are built on the edge, and most if not ALL of the key designers involved in both cycles (San Francisco and Bermuda) involving Multihulls are either working on AC36 or doing other things

You are right. Some are doing other things, including the design of new foils and systems for the AC50 series.

 

20 minutes ago, sclarke said:

And yet, when they sided with GD and ETNZ, most were trashing them and wanted them gone, because Red Bull represented the new Extreme vision for the AC, and LV represented the "Old Rich Boys Club" now they represent "prestige" haha 

That is completely made up. Most attacked Bertarelli for his treatment of Louis Vuitton. Everybody was siding with LV and their argument that all Bertarelli was doing was cheaping the AC. Later, everybody was pleased to see LV back in San Fran and Bermuda.

 

24 minutes ago, sclarke said:

Without knowing what the event is, which would most sailors recognise as being more prestigious? The Louis Vuitton Cup or the Prada Cup. The Americas Cup. Any challenger trophy whether it be the LV Cup, or the Prada Cup, is a stepping stone to the main prize. 

I see you cannot answer the question. It was not about the AC. It was about the perceived prestige of the LV Cup vs the Prada Cup. You avoided the question because you know the answer and don't like it.

26 minutes ago, sclarke said:

How do we know ETNZ have treated them badly? As far as I know, it was LV who decided it didn't make sense from a business standpoint, as Prada (a business Competitor) played a more important role as organisers of the Challenger Series.

Shows you know nothing. LV had previously sponsored when Prada was the CoR, so that was not the reason. LV wasn't even given the chance to bid for it. That was part of the deal between ETNZ and Bertelli. Dalton even said that they didn't need to look past Prada as a sponsor because they were totally in tune with the direction ETNZ wanted to take the cup. That was a slap in the face for LV who had bailed ETNZ out when they needed it with sponsorship for what became the LV Pacific Series.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, A Class Sailor said:

Not very good at Maths, are you. There were 5 teams last time around. 2 are going again. 2 out of 5 is not the majority. Even if you say that LR is an AC sailing team, which it wasn't last time, that makes 3 out of 6 which is still not a majority.

2 are going again (BAR and ETNZ), 3 for all intents and purposes are dead (Oracle, Softbank Team Japan and Groupama Team France), and one is still on the fence (Artemis). So that makes 2 of 3 teams still operational going again, so the majority of 3 is 2. so my maths is spot on.

You are right. Some are doing other things, including the design of new foils and systems for the AC50 series.

Are they? Then you have the scoop on the world. Believe it when (If) it happens.

That is completely made up. Most attacked Bertarelli for his treatment of Louis Vuitton. Everybody was siding with LV and their argument that all Bertarelli was doing was cheaping the AC. Later, everybody was pleased to see LV back in San Fran and Bermuda.

They were? The weren't many nice words (and there still aren't) towards Bruno Trouble, who at the time was the representative for LV and helped create and organise the LV Cup. after he had a few "Choice words" for Oracle and Golden Gate Yacht club.

http://www.sailingscuttlebutt.com/2015/04/03/bruno-trouble-this-is-definitely-not-the-americas-cup/

I see you cannot answer the question. It was not about the AC. It was about the perceived prestige of the LV Cup vs the Prada Cup. You avoided the question because you know the answer and don't like it.

The "perceived prestige" you mean like the "Perceived prestige" of the Louis Vuitton Playoff series Trophy (or what ever that monstrosity was called)

Shows you know nothing. LV had previously sponsored when Prada was the CoR, so that was not the reason. LV wasn't even given the chance to bid for it. That was part of the deal between ETNZ and Bertelli. Dalton even said that they didn't need to look past Prada as a sponsor because they were totally in tune with the direction ETNZ wanted to take the cup. That was a slap in the face for LV who had bailed ETNZ out when they needed it with sponsorship for what became the LV Pacific Series.

"A slap in the face" Don't be so dramatic! Its naming rights only. Louis Vuitton was reduced to mere sponsors of the Americas Cup in Bermuda, which is probably where they lost interest in the Americas Cup. They never got an opportunity to bid in Bermuda either, due to Red Bull becoming a major player due to their interest in sponsoring "Extreme sports" which is what the AC was attempting to become. It was only later that Coutts let them become a sponsor of the event, which means theyno longer had an organisation/ operational role in Bermuda, something they grew "frustrated" with, so as a "sponsor" ETNZ clearly had another option in Prada (who is also a competitor to Louis Vuitton) its a business decision, and also what happens when you make a deal with someone (concessions/ conditions) Louis Vuitton I'm sure understand this. Bruno Trouble as a former representative of LV has had nothing but good words for Dalton and ETNZ.

It was Coutts and his ACEA who reduced the role of LV in the Americas Cup from an operational role, to a sponsors role, to make way for Red Bull, so if you're going to blame anyone, blame ACEA and Russell Coutts.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, sclarke said:

The Majority of AC Sailing teams are committed to the next cycle.

2 are going again (BAR and ETNZ), 3 for all intents and purposes are dead (Oracle, Softbank Team Japan and Groupama Team France), and one is still on the fence (Artemis). So that makes 2 of 3 teams still operational going again, so the majority of 3 is 2. so my maths is spot on.

I begin to think you are just trolling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Tornado-Cat said:

I begin to think you are just trolling.

Why? What about what I said is not true? telling the truth is not "Trolling"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, sclarke said:

I'm saying the AC50's are built on the edge, and most if not ALL of the key designers involved in both cycles (San Francisco and Bermuda) involving Multihulls are either working on AC36 or doing other things. Most if not all? Do you know their names? Just wondering where this info on designers for the 3 teams competing comes fromThe Majority of AC Sailing teams are committed to the next cycle. Of the 6 teams in BDA 1 is committed to the next cup. That’s not a majority. Any design team would've had to have started either as soon as ETNZ crossed the finish line, or very shortly after, as even though from the outside, the boats may have looked very similar, the control systems and board shapes would have been vastly different.correct.  The control systems, as well as boards would have to have been re-designed, which they have been tested and validated in under a year. Boats rounded up,  purchase agreements/ leases signed, why would this have to happen strait away. You don’t need a boat to do a design, the drawings and known components from the one design aspect we’re already a known constant. designers put on retainers,? Why on retainers?  and deals signed for shipping each boat and accompanying containers shipped around the world. An impressive feat considering most of the AC teams were either taking time off, thinking about doing the next Americas Cup, or signing contracts for the Volvo Ocean Race. I mean, come on, it really doesn't have much going for it anymore. But hey, you can always hope. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, agk470 said:

 

Simmer and Holroyd (Oracle and Softbank Team Japan) have gone to BAR, Bernasconi and team, Guillame Verdier, as well as the Luna Rossa design team and Martin Fischer are involved with the Defender/ CoR respectively, Ian Burns (Oracle) has taken a job in a technology/ high performance role with Australian Sport, Botin has signed on with American Magic, so really, who is left?

Of the 6 teams, 2 are committed to the next cup, the rest are either not operational or on the fence, so that is a majority because you can no longer count teams who are non existent.

You all say they have been designed and are in build. Are they? you know this for sure?

You don't need a boat, but you do need something to test and validate any concepts. If everything is completely done using drawings and simulation software, you would think the design team, whomever they may be, would stick around until its actually been built?

Why retainers? What are they going to live on? Are you saying that they've been working for almost a year without pay? Also what stops Americas Cup teams from poaching them for their own campaigns? Somethings keeping them there, if indeed they are there, and don't tell me "because they think the boats are cool" that doesn't wash. These are Americas Cup designers, highly skilled and highly sought after, they don't work for free, not when they can be put on sizeable salaries in the AC.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ The entire rest of the OR, JPN, FRA and Artemis design teams. Also, mathematically speaking, 2 out of 6 = 33.33% - you don't get to randomly subtract 3 from 6 just because it fits your narrative to do so.

The whole point of the AC50s - including downsizing them from 62' - was to create sustainable, ultra high tech racing, in arguably the fastest sailboats on the planet. I would think they'd be better off outside the aegis of the AC, with all of it's politics and limited schedule. They are unique, and still fresh - they've only had a single regatta so far - and as has been noted above, there is nothing else on the water remotely at that scale that is 100% foiling around a race course including tacks. Rather than looking at a series as 'competition' to the AC, I see it as complementary in the sense that it creates a deeper pool of talent for future ACs, in a format that will allow new potential sailing superstars to develop their game in boats where the outcome is not mostly dictated by design decisions made months or years before the event.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, sclarke said:

Simmer and Holroyd (Oracle and Softbank Team Japan) have gone to BAR, Bernasconi and team, Guillame Verdier, as well as the Luna Rossa design team and Martin Fischer are involved with the Defender/ CoR respectively, Ian Burns (Oracle) has taken a job in a technology/ high performance role with Australian Sport, Botin has signed on with American Magic, so really, who is left?

More crap. Simmer isn't a designer and most of the rest aren't foil designers. The top foil designer at the moment has his own company in Spain and is designing foils for a wide range of customers. There are also others who are more than capable of designing foils for AC50's who would be free to do so. Who else? You seem to have missed the Artemis design team and with Artemis being one of the main movers behind the AC50 series, maybe they have been involved. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, surfsailor said:

^ The entire rest of the OR, JPN, FRA and Artemis design teams. Also, mathematically speaking, 2 out of 6 = 33.33% - you don't get to randomly subtract 3 from 6 just because it fits your narrative to do so.

There is no OR, JPN or FRA Design teams, they are no longer operational, therefor, they don't exist. They don't count. There is no such thing as Oracle Team USA, Softbank Team Japan or Groupama Team France anymore. So they can be discounted.

The whole point of the AC50s - including downsizing them from 62' - was to create sustainable, ultra high tech racing, in arguably the fastest sailboats on the planet. I would think they'd be better off outside the aegis of the AC, then they need to not use AC boats with all of it's politics and limited schedule. They are unique, and still fresh - they've only had a single regatta so far - and as has been noted above, there is nothing else on the water remotely at that scale that is 100% foiling around a race course including tacks. Rather than looking at a series as 'competition' to the AC, as long as they use AC Boats, I see it as complementary in the sense that it creates a deeper pool of talent for future ACs, in a format that will allow new potential sailing superstars to develop their game in boats where the outcome is not mostly dictated by design decisions made months or years before the event. The GC32 and ESS.

There are plenty of regattas that exist for this very purpose. The World Match Racing Circuit is a perfect example. The Congressional Cup is being sailed right now, and has seen some of the greatest Match Racing seen in a long time!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, sclarke said:

There is no OR, JPN or FRA Design teams, they are no longer operational, therefor, they don't exist. They don't count. There is no such thing as Oracle Team USA, Softbank Team Japan or Groupama Team France anymore. So they can be discounted.

So what's your 'theory' - that all the designers, engineers and software developers that worked on those teams vanished in a puff of lavender smoke?

LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, sclarke said:

Why? What about what I said is not true? telling the truth is not "Trolling"

In your previous post you were talking of "AC team", in the next one of "still operational going again teams" and your conclusion is that :"so the majority of 3 is 2. so my maths is spot on".

However,  even by modifying your definitions to make you right, you are wrong, because with your new definitions 100% of the AC teams are IN.  :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Tornado-Cat said:

In your previous post you were talking of "AC team", in the next one of "still operational going again teams" and your conclusion is that :"so the majority of 3 is 2. so my maths is spot on".

However,  even by modifying your definitions to make you right, you are wrong, because with your new definitions 100% of the AC teams are IN.  :)

But they're not. Artemis Racing is still operational,as they are still racing on the RC44 Circuit as the Artemis Racing Team, they even have a Youth team, yet they have not in any way committed to an AC campaign. BAR and ETNZ (Obviously) have, so that makes 2 from 3, so again, my maths is spot on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, surfsailor said:

So what's your 'theory' - that all the designers, engineers and software developers that worked on those teams vanished in a puff of lavender smoke?

LOL

My theory is, this AC50 series is, as Americans like to say... "A nothing burger" however this talk of an AC50 series will continue until the AC75's are launched when at such time, the world, as it always has, will have moved on to the new Americas Cup Class boats which will capture the attention of the sailing community. The quiet period in between cups always brings a tendency for people who enjoyed the previous Cup to want to see it continue. During the V5 period, everyone wanted the racing to continue after the Cup had finished, during the AC72 period, people wanted it even more because they were cool boats, now the AC world has gone quiet, and people want to see the AC50's again. It happens all the time, the AC goes quiet so minds start wandering, "what if this happens", and "I want this to happen", but once the cycle starts, boats are launched and teams start building up, that talk stops and the attention goes back to the Americas Cup. I don't blame you guys, the AC50's were very cool boats, but they have had their time. They belong in Americas Cup history, and thats where they should stay, unless a Team who wins the Americas Cup decides to bring them back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, sclarke said:

But they're not. Artemis Racing is still operational,as they are still racing on the RC44 Circuit as the Artemis Racing Team, they even have a Youth team, yet they have not in any way committed to an AC campaign. BAR and ETNZ (Obviously) have, so that makes 2 from 3, so again, my maths is spot on.

Another swing, another miss, you did say that Artemis was not in but on the fence, so the other ones represent 100%, I am just trying to find some logic to your posts :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Tornado-Cat said:

Another swing, another miss, you did say that Artemis was not in but on the fence, so the other ones represent 100%, I am just trying to find some logic to your posts :)

No I said "2 of 3 were committed (ETNZ and BAR) and one was on the Fence (Artemis Racing)" so the majority of 3 is 2. The other guy said 2 of 3 is 100% and I have no idea how he worked that out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/20/2018 at 9:25 PM, sclarke said:

My theory is, this AC50 series is, as Americans like to say... "A nothing burger" however this talk of an AC50 series will continue until the AC75's are launched when at such time, the world, as it always has, will have moved on to the new Americas Cup Class boats which will capture the attention of the sailing community. The quiet period in between cups always brings a tendency for people who enjoyed the previous Cup to want to see it continue. During the V5 period, everyone wanted the racing to continue after the Cup had finished, during the AC72 period, people wanted it even more because they were cool boats, now the AC world has gone quiet, and people want to see the AC50's again. It happens all the time, the AC goes quiet so minds start wandering, "what if this happens", and "I want this to happen", but once the cycle starts, boats are launched and teams start building up, that talk stops and the attention goes back to the Americas Cup. I don't blame you guys, the AC50's were very cool boats, but they have had their time. They belong in Americas Cup history, and thats where they should stay, unless a Team who wins the Americas Cup decides to bring them back.

The good news about your theory is that you’re an idiot. I’ll just leave it at that because nothing else really needs to be said. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Monkey said:

The good news about your theory is that you’re an idiot. I’ll just leave it at that because nothing else really needs to be said. 

Can't help it if the truth hurts. Anyway, You know what they say about people in glass houses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/24/2018 at 11:21 AM, sclarke said:

Can't help it if the truth hurts. Anyway, You know what they say about people in glass houses.

Clarkey, trust me on this. Someone inside Core told me they were working on these boats. His response wasn't prompted, I just asked what they were working on at the moment and he dropped that clanger. I was as surprised as anyone. Having mentioned this to a few others I got the impression that quite a few people already knew about this,hence the reason I started this thread. Do I think it will survive? That's a whole other story

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As to whether this series will happen - there's far too much smoke for there not to be a fire. There are reports from professional sailors and from boat builders - some of them quite detailed.

A public annoucement as to whether it will or will not happen can't be too far away.

But not announcing it already is - IMHO - respectful to the America's Cup. The entry period for AC36 is from 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2018, so almost 4 of the 6 month period has passed.

Making an early annoucement would raise the accusation that the series is trying to directly compete with the America's Cup, whereas delaying it allows the AC to get as many entries as they can manage and stops any media battles between the 2 competitions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"There are reports' are there? Where?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sclarke said:

"There are reports' are there? Where?

On this forum, for one. Offshore1 reports that Core are working on the boats. Just because it isn't published by a journalist or there is no press release doesn't mean that it isn't a "report". In this day of social media, forums like this is how a lot of stuff is reported. SA has always had well connected people post "reports" that are later furtyher substantiated by a press release. In the case of the AC50 circuit, there are now so many different sources and reports that you have to have your head well and truly up your a#%e not to believe it is probably going to happen. Or do you think that a widely diverse group of people who have no relationship to each other are all posting stuff they have made up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, A Class Sailor said:

On this forum, for one. Offshore1 reports that Core are working on the boats. Just because it isn't published by a journalist or there is no press release doesn't mean that it isn't a "report". In this day of social media, forums like this is how a lot of stuff is reported. SA has always had well connected people post "reports" that are later furtyher substantiated by a press release. In the case of the AC50 circuit, there are now so many different sources and reports that you have to have your head well and truly up your a#%e not to believe it is probably going to happen. Or do you think that a widely diverse group of people who have no relationship to each other are all posting stuff they have made up?

"In the case of the AC50 circuit, there are now so many different sources and reports that you have to have your head well and truly up your a#%e not to believe it is probably going to happen" Again...I ask you Where are these "many different sources and reports"?  

"a widely diverse group of people who have no relationship to each other are all posting stuff they have made up?" A widely diverse group? You mean the same group that has bitched and moaned about everything about the next AC? The same people who when ETNZ were talking about "extremely high costs in AC34" answered with "Oh well if you can't afford it, get out" and are now saying "The next AC is far too expensive and the boats are ugly and too complicated" and then saw one, just one report from Tom Ehman about a possible AC50 series and pounced on it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone who says its too expensive to compete in the AC shouldn't be there, Its the AC, the Cream of the Cream in both design and sailing so it should be elitist by both teams and athletes. It would lose all its charm and pedigree if it is able to be competed by joe average. I say good on NZ for doing what they have done, Personally i'd rather of it continued in the cats and watched the development but Nz has every right to do as they wish, they have stayed competing and developing so good on them, It will be a wild ass cup and the boats will be wicked and beasts to sail, Is it the right thing to do for sailing? why should NZ have to worry about that, Its the boat that they want to design and defend in. Will the boats be faster than the 50's? who cares...why does the cup have to get faster? 

Bring on the big $$$ as it will mean a great trickle down to the whole sailing community with both technologies and work for more people.

The 50 series will happen and wont take any spotlight off the cup, If a team wants to compete in the cup they will simple, if they want to sail in a more commercially friendly series and racing sooner than 2021, then they will sail the 50's. will they do both, Id highly doubt it but that would be impressive.

Is it out of spite, who knows and who cares. who are we to say what they should or shouldn't spend their money on the 50 or cup. I know what I'd be doing if i was a billionaire. IT seems that its all playing out very much like it was before the cup, the teams that wanted to keep the 50 running will, the team that didn't isnt, pretty simple, both are doing exactly as they said they would so actually are to be commended for sticking to their plans.

Its not the CUP its not going to try to be the CUP, Its simply a way to get high speed high action sailing on TV or online so more people can watch, more sponsors can get involved and more people working in the awesome industry that is our sport and passion and keep sailors busy, would this format work as the cup of future? well not unless one of the teams can knock of the kiwis and that wouldn't be an easy task on the best of days.

Not exactly sure how this is a bad thing, I love the cup and cant wait to see the boats launched and sailed. the engineering feat will be that of climbing Everest and the skill set to sail them will put the best on edge no doubt, I equally cant wait to see the 50's ripping around fleet racing equally as challenging and wild. what an awesome 3 years of yachting to come. the STOKE is real. 

You guy all need to chill, stop being keyboard heros and spend more time out there yachting, foiling, kiting, wind whacking or anything and or watching yachting, then maybe you'll be to tired to sling shit at each other :D

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, agk470 said:

You guy all need to chill, stop being keyboard heros and spend more time out there yachting, foiling, kiting, wind whacking or anything and or watching yachting, then maybe you'll be to tired to sling shit at each other :D

fucking sock puppet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I guess this counts Team GBR/ LRBAR out of this series.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sclarke said:

Well I guess this counts Team GBR/ LRBAR out of this series.

 

That is a great video, includes nice succinct class rules and is best rendering of boat so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, sclarke said:

Well I guess this counts Team GBR/ LRBAR out of this series.

Please can you explain how you come to that conclusion. there is no reason at all why they cannot do both and there would be lots of benefits. Where else can you get practice at sailing at 40+ knots in close quarters against other boats?

You really are a hater of the worst sort. You claim everybody is making up stuff because they hate ETNZ, so let's see how that stacks up. Please tell us who is lying.

1. Is ACS lying when he says that Ian Murray said he is going to be running the racing  and that the mods are underway. Is he lying when he posted that Tom Slingsby has said he will be helming in the series?

2. Am I lying when I say I have been told that Artemis are in with Outteridge as helm and Percy running the show?

3.Was agk470 lying when he says that Grant Simmer told him that the boards were being made and the boats were being done, or was Simmer lying?

4. Is Offshore 1 lying when he reports that Core is currently working on the AC50's. Or was the Core staff member who told him lying?

5. In a recent interview by Sailjuice (Andy Rice), Paul Goodison mentions the AC50 series, although admits he doesn't have details. Did he just make that up, or does he at least know something to make him mention it in public?

6. Was the President of La Fraglia Vela Malcesine either lying or simply made up the story about being approached by a group headed by Ellison to host and event in the Loius Vuitton Cup in a program that involves Barcelona, Dubai and San Fran. Are you suggesting that they won't be using AC50's for that series?

Either everybody is lying or there is something going on.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Team_GBR said:

Please can you explain how you come to that conclusion. there is no reason at all why they cannot do both and there would be lots of benefits. Where else can you get practice at sailing at 40+ knots in close quarters against other boats?

Because Ben Ainslie, and his teams sole focus will be the AC. They have confirmed their challenge and their main backer.

You really are a hater of the worst sort. You claim everybody is making up stuff because they hate ETNZ, so let's see how that stacks up. Please tell us who is lying.

1. Is ACS lying when he says that Ian Murray said he is going to be running the racing  and that the mods are underway. Is he lying when he posted that Tom Slingsby has said he will be helming in the series?

2. Am I lying when I say I have been told that Artemis are in with Outteridge as helm and Percy running the show?

3.Was agk470 lying when he says that Grant Simmer told him that the boards were being made and the boats were being done, or was Simmer lying?

4. Is Offshore 1 lying when he reports that Core is currently working on the AC50's. Or was the Core staff member who told him lying?

5. In a recent interview by Sailjuice (Andy Rice), Paul Goodison mentions the AC50 series, although admits he doesn't have details. Did he just make that up, or does he at least know something to make him mention it in public?

6. Was the President of La Fraglia Vela Malcesine either lying or simply made up the story about being approached by a group headed by Ellison to host and event in the Loius Vuitton Cup in a program that involves Barcelona, Dubai and San Fran. Are you suggesting that they won't be using AC50's for that series?

Either everybody is lying or there is something going on.

First of all, calm down. I never called anyone a liar! I just said until there is some kind, any kind of report stating that anything is going on, take it with a grain of salt. You've gone all in on the fact that someone mentioned something a while but had no details. Now...how about you answer me this...who's gonna do it? Where/ when/ who/how? thats all I've ever asked...and all you ever said was, "Oh someone said something about it" so its on.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sclarke said:

Because Ben Ainslie, and his teams sole focus will be the AC. They have confirmed their challenge and their main backer.

Is ETNZ sole focus the AC? Then why are Blair and Pete doing the VOR?

Is LR, AM, TeamGB sole focus the AC? Then why are they doing the TP52 Series? Why is DB doing the congressional cup?

They're doing the TP circuit because...

1. They don't have an AC boat to sail

2. It is high performance close racing which will benefit the team.

How can you not see that doing an AC50 circuit could only be beneficial to an AC team? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, kawalski said:

Is ETNZ sole focus the AC? Then why are Blair and Pete doing the VOR?

Is LR, AM, TeamGB sole focus the AC? Then why are they doing the TP52 Series? Why is DB doing the congressional cup?

They're doing the TP circuit because...

1. They don't have an AC boat to sail

2. It is high performance close racing which will benefit the team.

How can you not see that doing an AC50 circuit could only be beneficial to an AC team? 

Is Ben Ainslies sole focus the Americas Cup? Yes it is. They are doing the PAC52 series because they believe it is the best way to learn/ train and develop crew work in monohull sailing, while at the same time racing monohulls.  Its the same reason Pete and Blair are doing the Volvo Ocean Race, to gain monohull experience while still maintaining a competitive edge. Dean Barker is back in the congressional cup and has been working with the Rambler 88 team because its monohull experience while maintaining the competitive edge. The AC focus will come once the entry period ends and teams are finalised, until then, its about training and developing crew work on the art of monohull sailing which is why we see Ainslie in the PAC52 Class, Pete and Blair in the VOR and Barker in the Congressional Cup. If the 50's were beneficial don't you think we would see teams like Team GB and ETNZ using those already proven, already established and already tested platforms instead of looking for something else? Ainslie has recycled all of his test and race boats, ETNZ are going to display theirs once the base is finalised, who really knows where the others are, so if they were as beneficial as you say they are, don't you think Teams would at least be maintaining them instead of recycling/ storing them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, sclarke said:

Is Ben Ainslies sole focus the Americas Cup? Yes it is. They are doing the PAC52 series because they believe it is the best way to learn/ train and develop crew work in monohull sailing, while at the same time racing monohulls.  Its the same reason Pete and Blair are doing the Volvo Ocean Race, to gain monohull experience while still maintaining a competitive edge. Dean Barker is back in the congressional cup and has been working with the Rambler 88 team because its monohull experience while maintaining the competitive edge. The AC focus will come once the entry period ends and teams are finalised, until then, its about training and developing crew work on the art of monohull sailing which is why we see Ainslie in the PAC52 Class, Pete and Blair in the VOR and Barker in the Congressional Cup. If the 50's were beneficial don't you think we would see teams like Team GB and ETNZ using those already proven, already established and already tested platforms instead of looking for something else? Ainslie has recycled all of his test and race boats, ETNZ are going to display theirs once the base is finalised, who really knows where the others are, so if they were as beneficial as you say they are, don't you think Teams would at least be maintaining them instead of recycling/ storing them?

BAR have not recycled their race boat

only test boats, and not even all of them, one is in a museum somewhere

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, inebriated said:

BAR have not recycled their race boat

only test boats, and not even all of them, one is in a museum somewhere

They recycled all 5 of their test boats, and T1 is displayed in a museum and was nicknamed "The Princesses boat" as Kate Middleton took the helm one time, which is a huge part of the reason they chose to display it, otherwise it too would've went through the shredder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, sclarke said:

They recycled all 5 of their test boats, and T1 is displayed in a museum and was nicknamed "The Princesses boat" as Kate Middleton took the helm one time, which is a huge part of the reason they chose to display it, otherwise it too would've went through the shredder.

and T2 is in their display room as some sort of look around thing

regardless, their ac50 is still intact somewhere,  not munched

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, sclarke said:

Is Ben Ainslies sole focus the Americas Cup? Yes it is. They are doing the PAC52 series because they believe it is the best way to learn/ train and develop crew work in monohull sailing, while at the same time racing monohulls. 

Seriously? Do you actually understand anything about sailing? The TP52's are nothing like the boats that are going to be raced in the AC. In the absence of anything better, they are sailing them because it is the best pro sailing around. If they didn't do that, they would do nothing.

51 minutes ago, sclarke said:

 Its the same reason Pete and Blair are doing the Volvo Ocean Race, to gain monohull experience while still maintaining a competitive edge.

Now we know you have no idea. The Volvo boats are even less like the new AC boats than the TP52's and sailing them does not maintain a competitive edge because one is about short term, boat on boat strategy while the other is all about long term, fleet related strategies. The reason why Pete and Blair are doing the Volvo is because it is the only thing that would pay them enough money for the year or so that ETNZ couldn't afford to pay them. It's great for ETNZ. 2 of their stars that they have no use for at the moment are earning enough money until they are needed, meaning that they won't be targets for other teams with loads of money that can afford to have them doing nothing for a year.

What you don't seem to be able to grasp is that the new AC boat has more in common with the old AC50's than they do with any other type of boat. They will not sail like a conventional monohull. 3 things make them very different, with the most obvious being that  they will foil. Foiling alone makes the boat handle completely differently. If you sail a foiler like a non foiling mono, you will be in very serious trouble. The way the main foil is so far to leeward means that the boat will behave like a multi, because the relationship between the centre of effort and the centre of lift (buoyancy). Then you need to consider that these boats will sail downwind with the apparent wind forward of the beam. TP52's and Volvo 65's don't sail like that.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Team_GBR said:

Seriously? Do you actually understand anything about sailing? The TP52's are nothing like the boats that are going to be raced in the AC. In the absence of anything better, they are sailing them because it is the best pro sailing around. If they didn't do that, they would do nothing.

Nothing is like the boats that are being used in the next Cup. Grant Simmer stated they are looking around for a suitable training platform but had found nothing, but that the TP52 allows the team to develop crew work and communication in the discipline of Monohull sailing. Not a word about the AC50's being a suitable training platform.

Now we know you have no idea. The Volvo boats are even less like the new AC boats than the TP52's and sailing them does not maintain a competitive edge because one is about short term, boat on boat strategy while the other is all about long term, fleet related strategies. The reason why Pete and Blair are doing the Volvo is because it is the only thing that would pay them enough money for the year or so that ETNZ couldn't afford to pay them. It's great for ETNZ. 2 of their stars that they have no use for at the moment are earning enough money until they are needed, meaning that they won't be targets for other teams with loads of money that can afford to have them doing nothing for a year.

Pete and Blair are committed to the team for the next cycle, that much is confirmed. What role they play as it pertains to the sailing crew is yet to be confirmed. But they are doing the Volvo because "Its something they always wanted to do, but never had the time to do" as well as provides them with experience sailing large monohulls. Like I said, NOTHING is like the new AC Class boats, but one hull, a full crew with traditional soft sail rigs, and monohull set-ups and techniques makes more sense than a 50 foot rigid wing catamaran. Even you have to get past your hatred of Team NZ and admit that.

What you don't seem to be able to grasp is that the new AC boat has more in common with the old AC50's No they don't, they couldn't be further from them, which is why NO existing or potential teams have trained in an AC50. Not even the teams who do have them are using them. than they do with any other type of boat. They will not sail like a conventional monohull. 3 things make them very different, with the most obvious being that  they will foil. Foiling alone makes the boat handle completely differently. If you sail a foiler like a non foiling mono, you will be in very serious trouble. The way the main foil is so far to leeward means that the boat will behave like a multi, because the relationship between the centre of effort and the centre of lift (buoyancy). Then you need to consider that these boats will sail downwind with the apparent wind forward of the beam. TP52's and Volvo 65's don't sail like that. Agreed, but until AC75's are built, or until the teams come up with a suitable training platform, the TP52's are the only suitable training platform allowed under the protocol, to start with, which is why Luna Rossa, Team GB and American Magic have gone with those classes, and will continue with those classes until their 75's are built. If the AC50's were a suitable training platform, they would be using them, but they're not, which speaks to the fact they obviously aren't. But hey, who am I to stop you thinking that you know better than any Americas Cup team currently competing. Give yourself an uppercut.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Team_GBR said:

Seriously? Do you actually understand anything about sailing? The TP52's are nothing like the boats that are going to be raced in the AC. In the absence of anything better, they are sailing them because it is the best pro sailing around. If they didn't do that, they would do nothing.

Now we know you have no idea. The Volvo boats are even less like the new AC boats than the TP52's and sailing them does not maintain a competitive edge because one is about short term, boat on boat strategy while the other is all about long term, fleet related strategies. The reason why Pete and Blair are doing the Volvo is because it is the only thing that would pay them enough money for the year or so that ETNZ couldn't afford to pay them. It's great for ETNZ. 2 of their stars that they have no use for at the moment are earning enough money until they are needed, meaning that they won't be targets for other teams with loads of money that can afford to have them doing nothing for a year.

What you don't seem to be able to grasp is that the new AC boat has more in common with the old AC50's than they do with any other type of boat. They will not sail like a conventional monohull. 3 things make them very different, with the most obvious being that  they will foil. Foiling alone makes the boat handle completely differently. If you sail a foiler like a non foiling mono, you will be in very serious trouble. The way the main foil is so far to leeward means that the boat will behave like a multi, because the relationship between the centre of effort and the centre of lift (buoyancy). Then you need to consider that these boats will sail downwind with the apparent wind forward of the beam. TP52's and Volvo 65's don't sail like that.

 


AC =  Ok jibing in three boat lengths ready go .

Volvo = Ok its Monday jibing Thursday mid day sometime so be ready. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys why are you even bothering discussing this with sclarke? It's a waste of keystrokes.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, sclarke said:

They recycled all 5 of their test boats, and T1 is displayed in a museum and was nicknamed "The Princesses boat" as Kate Middleton took the helm one time, which is a huge part of the reason they chose to display it, otherwise it too would've went through the shredder.

Oracles test boat 1 was given to Softbank then Soft bank gave it to Bermuda to put on show, last seen on front street of Hamilton,

Oracles test boat 2 was also given to Bermuda government and is out in Dockyard on a stand 10mtrs up.

Oracles race boat is at core.

France's test boat became their race boat and not sure where it ended up

BAR first test boat was the 65 mock up so was useless before it launched unfortunately, think thats the one in their base in UK, T2 and T3 not sure but i think that they mulched one of them 

BAR's race boat is sitting at core.

Artemis T1 last seen at dockyard in its cradles after the team left presumably given to the government.T2 was the one that broke her beams so went to the bin. 

Artemis race boat is at core.

Softbanks race boat is sitting at core

Kiwis boats presumably are at their base in NZ

Great to see Ben Finally entering, My take is due to signing the "framework" last time the company/team BAR wasn't allowed to enter without breaking a contract with larry/Russell so they dissolved LRBAR and have started a completely new team and club to challenge, bloody expensive but Im guessing cheaper than the option of paying out of the contract. Good on them! 

4 teams, Game on, will be awesome. 

Anyone thought that the sailors are sailing because they want to, not about money or anything other than people who are hell bent and passionate about sailing so they are out there yachting on whatever they want to do, Dean is a master match racer so makes sense he loves it and is doing match racing because he wants to, Pete and Blair probably have dreamed about doing the volvo so the chance is there now so they have taken it. Ben probably doesn't give 2 shits what he sails, Im sure as shit he wouldn't be loving sailing with an owner driver, He will sail a number of boats whilst the AC demand is low and they are on break. Jimmy will be doing some TP stuff and probably enjoying down time after a few full on years. Slingsby did the Hobart and is racing in Australia on all different types of boats from his insta, Outteridge appears to be doing some olympic class sailing again, Iain Jensen, paul Goodison and Bruni still whipping around in moths. Kyle Langford and Luke Parkinson doing volvo also. thats just a few in a few different classes

Seems that the guys are all just doing a heap of sailing enjoying what they are doing, when your job is your passion your doing pretty well! lucky bastards. 

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, agk470 said:

Oracles test boat 1 was given to Softbank then Soft bank gave it to Bermuda to put on show, last seen on front street of Hamilton,

Oracles test boat 2 was also given to Bermuda government and is out in Dockyard on a stand 10mtrs up.

Oracles race boat is at core.

France's test boat became their race boat and not sure where it ended up

BAR first test boat was the 65 mock up so was useless before it launched unfortunately, think thats the one in their base in UK, T2 and T3 not sure but i think that they mulched one of them 

BAR's race boat is sitting at core.

Artemis T1 last seen at dockyard in its cradles after the team left presumably given to the government.T2 was the one that broke her beams so went to the bin. 

Artemis race boat is at core.

Softbanks race boat is sitting at core

Kiwis boats presumably are at their base in NZ

Great to see Ben Finally entering, My take is due to signing the "framework" last time the company/team BAR wasn't allowed to enter without breaking a contract with larry/Russell so they dissolved LRBAR and have started a completely new team and club to challenge, bloody expensive but Im guessing cheaper than the option of paying out of the contract. Good on them! 

4 teams, Game on, will be awesome. 

Anyone thought that the sailors are sailing because they want to, not about money or anything other than people who are hell bent and passionate about sailing so they are out there yachting on whatever they want to do, Dean is a master match racer so makes sense he loves it and is doing match racing because he wants to, Pete and Blair probably have dreamed about doing the volvo so the chance is there now so they have taken it. Ben probably doesn't give 2 shits what he sails, Im sure as shit he wouldn't be loving sailing with an owner driver, He will sail a number of boats whilst the AC demand is low and they are on break. Jimmy will be doing some TP stuff and probably enjoying down time after a few full on years. Slingsby did the Hobart and is racing in Australia on all different types of boats from his insta, Outteridge appears to be doing some olympic class sailing again, Iain Jensen, paul Goodison and Bruni still whipping around in moths. Kyle Langford and Luke Parkinson doing volvo also. thats just a few in a few different classes

Seems that the guys are all just doing a heap of sailing enjoying what they are doing, when your job is your passion your doing pretty well! lucky bastards. 

 

 

oracle had 3 test boats, they were doing 2 boat testing right up to the 50 launch

i also believe that artemis had 3 test boats and it was the 3rd test boat that carked it

and technically, BAR's first test boat was pretty much an ac45f that wasn't class legal

that's pretty comprehensive though i think

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, maxmini said:


AC =  Ok jibing in three boat lengths ready go .

Volvo = Ok its Monday jibing Thursday mid day sometime so be ready. 

Tell that to Mapfre :wacko:;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, inebriated said:

oracle had 3 test boats, they were doing 2 boat testing right up to the 50 launch

i also believe that artemis had 3 test boats and it was the 3rd test boat that carked it

and technically, BAR's first test boat was pretty much an ac45f that wasn't class legal

that's pretty comprehensive though i think

Sorry yep you are right about Oracle. Boat 2 ended up in a shipping container and stored. Boat 3 was in the hanger all the way up to the cup. Behind the 50 on the stands. 

Artemis only had 2 that’s 100%  t1 launched in San Fran early  and t2 was launched in San Fran as the team were moving to Bermuda  the only boat they launched in Bermuda was magic blue 

and yes BAR’s T1 was a tiller stear turbo so yep  your 100% correct  

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.sail-world.com/news/204585/Am-Cup-After-three-years-away-USAs-Barker-returns

"Barker sailed for the Japanese team in the last Cup in Bermuda. That syndicate, which got a kick-start from the then-defenders Oracle Team USA, has since disbanded"

So Oracle has shut down, Team Japan has disbanded, ETNZ and Team GB have committed to the AC. Its over.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, sclarke said:

https://www.sail-world.com/news/204585/Am-Cup-After-three-years-away-USAs-Barker-returns

"Barker sailed for the Japanese team in the last Cup in Bermuda. That syndicate, which got a kick-start from the then-defenders Oracle Team USA, has since disbanded"

So Oracle has shut down, Team Japan has disbanded, ETNZ and Team GB have committed to the AC. Its over.

 

Say you're right. The real question is why do you come in this thread to constantly tell people it's bullshit when they think it's not and want to discuss it? Why do you repeat the same shit over and over? Don't you have anything better to do with the time it took you to post the same bitter shit 3000 times?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pusslicker said:

Say you're right. The real question is why do you come in this thread to constantly tell people it's bullshit when they think it's not and want to discuss it? Why do you repeat the same shit over and over? Don't you have anything better to do with the time it took you to post the same bitter shit 3000 times?

Because the only reason those people are wanting it to happen is because they don't like what ETNZ/ LR have come up with for the Americas Cup. And instead of giving the AC75 concept a chance to work before a boat is launched, they start pining for a boat that clearly was NOT the preferred choice. These people who once advocated for a sustainable Americas Cup moving into the future have now abandoned it and want something else because they didn't get what they wanted and are shitting all over it saying things like "Its too expensive, and "It won't work" and "Its a step backwards" and "The AC75's won't be faster than the 50's and Top speed doesn't mean shit" so who are the real haters? Here's a question for you: If they had've gone back to the AC72's but written the rule to incorporate upwind/ downwind foiling with speeds in excess of those seen on the AC50's, would they still be pining for the 50's? I think not.

This isn't about wanting to see fast boats zipping around a course, because if it was, they'd be talking about the GC32's which provide that, but they aren't. If it was about the technology, or a revolutionary concept, then they would give the AC75 a chance simply because it fulfills both of those things, but they aren't, so whats it really about? Its about spite, pure and simple. 

The AC world has moved on. The AC50's are the past. The AC75's are the future, that's how it should be. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, sclarke said:

Because the only reason those people are wanting it to happen is because they don't like what ETNZ/ LR have come up with for the Americas Cup.

That is nothing short of paranoid rubbish. 

The reason why so many people want to see the AC50 series happen is because

  1. They are great boats and it would be good to see more of them
  2. Fleet racing AC50's will be like no other sailing around
  3. The AC50 series will be completely different to the AC, because it will be a travelling circuit, fleet racing and one design.
  4. There is loads of room in sailing for more super fast sailing series. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, A Class Sailor said:

That is nothing short of paranoid rubbish. 

The reason why so many people want to see the AC50 series happen is because

  1. They are great boats and it would be good to see more of them
  2. Agreed
  3. Fleet racing AC50's will be like no other sailing around
  4. Except it will be exactly like the ESS
  5. The AC50 series will be completely different to the AC, because it will be a travelling circuit, fleet racing and one design.
  6. Except it will be using AC Class boats, and the AC will have its own travelling circuit also called the Americas Cup World Series in the 2nd half of 2019 and start of 2020.
  7. There is loads of room in sailing for more super fast sailing series. 
  8. Or you could just watch the ESS.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites