Sign in to follow this  
badlatitude

This is What Happens When You Piss Off People With Morals

Recommended Posts

Seeing Trump before a Judge trying to prove he is a moral person of good character will either be a great comedy or a great tragedy.

Religious leaders, former judges asks DC to revoke Trump Hotel's liquor license due to president's '

Lack of Good Character

Source: The Hill

Religious leaders, former judges asks DC to revoke Trump Hotel's liquor license due to president's 'lack of good character'

BY LUIS SANCHEZ - 06/20/18 02:18 PM EDT 

Religious leaders and former judges filed a complaint on Wednesday (1) asking the Washington D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to revoke the Trump International Hotel's liquor license because of President Trump's character. 

The complaint argues that a D.C. liquor license can be suspended or revoked if the "true and actual owner" of an establishment is not a person of "good character." 

"Donald Trump, the true and actual owner of the Trump International Hotel, is not a person of good character. The Trump International Hotel nonetheless currently holds a Class C/H license issued by the Board," the complaint reads. 

The complainants, who are D.C. residents, are asking the board to investigate Trump's "lack of good character." ... They also want the hotel's licensee, Trump Old Post Office LLC, to appear before the board to show cause why its license to sell and serve alcoholic beverages should not be revoked. 

(1) https://www.scribd.com/document/382150793/2018-06-20-Complaint-to-Request-Hearing-to-Show-Cause-Why-Liquor-License-Should-Not-Be-Revoked

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/393282-complaint-asks-dc-to-revoke-trump-hotels-liquor-license-on-grounds-of 
 

Here's a link to the full complaint against @realdonaldtrump, seeking to revoke Trump DC hotel's liquor license b/c its owner is allegedly not "of good character." Again, unclear if the DC govt will take this seriously. 

https://www.scribd.com/document/382150793/2018-06-20-Complaint-to-Request-Hearing-to-Show-Cause-Why-Liquor-License-Should-Not-Be-Revoked ... [http://scribd.com ] 
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, lonesailor said:

So not what you would do, like give scary guns to possible felon?

You’re deep in the sauce early.

 

SAD!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BL, though it would be a nice bit of spite, I think it just might be a tad dangerous in this current Atwellian climate.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Shortforbob said:

BL, though it would be a nice bit of spite, I think it just might be a tad dangerous in this current Atwellian climate.

 

Our dear leader deserves the contempt, and if there is a Trump Hotel in Oz I hope you'll oblige the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you may want a bunch of religious leaders inspecting the character of liquor licence holders or (Australia) Brothel licences and running off the the licencing authorities with archaic rules and standards to be reviewed..but I don't.:rolleyes:

be careful what you wish for. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Shortforbob said:

Well you may want a bunch of religious leaders inspecting the character of liquor licence holders or (Australia) Brothel licences and running off the the licencing authorities with archaic rules and standards to be reviewed..but I don't.:rolleyes:

be careful what you wish for. 

Similar laws apply in Victoria,  meli. Anyone can make a complaint to the victorian commissioner for gambling and liquor licensing regarding the character of the license holder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Lying Malarky said:

Similar laws apply in Victoria,  meli. Anyone can make a complaint to the victorian commissioner for gambling and liquor licensing regarding the character of the license holder.

of course they can, but we dont usually advocate the likes of Ivan Stratov running off to the authority with tales of debauchery. 

The Libs here are fighting off the religious right as it is, they actually need our help ...who'd a thunk I'd ever type such heresy :D

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/the-religious-minority-seizing-power-in-the-liberal-party-20180601-p4ziyq.html

 

How's B?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Shortforbob said:

Well you may want a bunch of religious leaders inspecting the character of liquor licence holders or (Australia) Brothel licences and running off the the licencing authorities with archaic rules and standards to be reviewed..but I don't.:rolleyes:

be careful what you wish for. 

I think the remedy is appropriate and I'm not talking about a return to prohibition or power to bands of Evangelicals who already given up their right to pass judgment on anything. Besides, anyone can bring charges; it's the authorities who pass judgment and are most likely already in the pockets of the license holders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A BL thread is Like Cat Nip for the faithful.  No real reason to get excited over a nothing story but throw Trumps name in the story and the lefty  cats go nuts with excitement. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, TMSAIL said:

A BL thread is Like Cat Nip for the faithful.  No real reason to get excited over a nothing story but throw Trumps name in the story and the lefty  cats go nuts with excitement. 

Ha Ha, TM jumps in whenever Trump is verbally assaulted. A veritable Rudy Giuliani of PA.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

see tRump is still throwing paid actors :rolleyes: out of his rallys and Bob must be spitting chips  .........

 

Most times you can't hear 'em talk
Other times you can
All the same old cliches
"Is that a woman or a man?"

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, TMSAIL said:

A BL thread is Like Cat Nip for the faithful.  No real reason to get excited over a nothing story but throw Trumps name in the story and the lefty  cats go nuts with excitement. 

Do you think Trump has good, moral character, TM?

It's kind of a yes/no question, even though it is your opinion. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Clove Hitch said:

even though it is your opinion. 

never going to get that from one who's paid to have one . ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m no longer newish here but from what I’ve see based on reputation Bent Sailor and BL seem WAY more credible than TMS...

  • Like 3
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Fakenews said:

I’m no longer newish here but from what I’ve see based on reputation Bent Sailor and BL seem WAY more credible than TMS...

I'm sure TM's buddies on StormFront regard him as credible. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the section of the complaint that details why Trump's character is deficient. It sort of puts "they had a chitchat on the tarmac" and "Hillary used emails" to shame. They cover lies, payments to "Stormy Daniels", numerous instances of alleged assault on women, failure to pay contractors, numerous examples of personal racist views, repeated and longstanding relationships with criminals (foreign and domestic), money laundering charges... it goes on, but it's well researched. 

Anytime Dog whips out his cut and past list, we can just refer him here:P

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Clove Hitch said:

Do you think Trump has good, moral character, TM?

It's kind of a yes/no question, even though it is your opinion. 

Nope I think his character is horrible.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TMSAIL said:

Nope I think his character is horrible.  

Well, then there is excellent legal ground to pull the liquor license from his hotel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Clove Hitch said:

Well, then there is excellent legal ground to pull the liquor license from his hotel

Why?  The Hotel is not privately owned. Trump doesn’t personally manage the hotel.   This kind of thinking is the height of hypocracy.  How many people are employed at that hotel?   How many are lower income? minorities?   Yet the left would be willing to put all those people out of work because they don’t like the president.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone seen Melania?

I find it suspicious that she has been missing for a while.

Have they done something with her again?

And what about the Nazi daughter who married a Jew?  

And where the hell is Hillary when we need her most?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Mickey Rat said:

Has anyone seen Melania?

I find it suspicious that she has been missing for a while.

Have they done something with her again?

And what about the Nazi daughter who married a Jew?  

And where the hell is Hillary when we need her most?

Malaria has been entertaining the Queen of Spain, probably trying to show her the right size cage for their immigrants. Hillary has been around she was just in the news supporting the immigrant children. I'm not sure about Ivanka, but I heard she was creating recipes with parts of children in a sauce.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fakenews said:

I’m no longer newish here but from what I’ve see based on reputation Bent Sailor and BL seem WAY more credible than TMS...

BL maybe but Bent? Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

You still new here clearly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TMSAIL said:

Why?  The Hotel is not privately owned. Trump doesn’t personally manage the hotel.   This kind of thinking is the height of hypocracy.  How many people are employed at that hotel?   How many are lower income? minorities?   Yet the left would be willing to put all those people out of work because they don’t like the president.  

Simply put, no right minded community would want Trump, his family or his associates operating a business in their community.   If there is a legal way to prevent that, it's a good option. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Shortforbob said:

of course they can, but we dont usually advocate the likes of Ivan Stratov running off to the authority with tales of debauchery. 

The Libs here are fighting off the religious right as it is, they actually need our help ...who'd a thunk I'd ever type such heresy :D

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/the-religious-minority-seizing-power-in-the-liberal-party-20180601-p4ziyq.html

 

How's B?

All rigged up and waiting for holidays to explore some local rivers and creeks.

I think I have a sore back from sleeping in a swag in my future. ....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Lying Malarky said:

All rigged up and waiting for holidays to explore some local rivers and creeks.

I think I have a sore back from sleeping in a swag in my future. ....

Are you and Meli doing some kind of cryptic sexting ahead of  playing out some 'Doing the wild thing outdoors' fantasy? Personally, among other changes, I would have chosen a warmer time of year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Fakenews said:

I’m no longer newish here but from what I’ve see based on reputation Bent Sailor and BL seem WAY more credible than TMS...

You were never new you sock. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Lying Malarky said:

All rigged up and waiting for holidays to explore some local rivers and creeks.

I think I have a sore back from sleeping in a swag in my future. ....

heh..how do you think I got the bug, not quite S&A or WITW, but close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Clove Hitch said:
8 hours ago, TMSAIL said:

Nope I think his character is horrible.  

Well, then there is excellent legal ground to pull the liquor license from his hotel 

I agree with TM about his character.

But the hotel isn't being targeted due to character. It's being targeted due to politics and we all know it.

And that's why a "good moral character" requirement isn't an excellent legal ground for anything but a political attack on a business.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, LB 15 said:

Are you and Meli doing some kind of cryptic sexting ahead of  playing out some 'Doing the wild thing outdoors' fantasy? Personally, among other changes, I would have chosen a warmer time of year.

Winter in Melbourne is all about the wild thing. Though indoors is the more forgivable environment.

 

Meli aint back yet. She's still stuck in an airport cue decanting hair conditioner.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, LB 15 said:

BL maybe but Bent? Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

You still new here clearly.

Who’s sock is Fakenews?  In that you will find your answer as to why BENT who was not even part of the discussion was included.  Attention whore seeks new audience comes to mind.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, TMSAIL said:

Nope I think his character is horrible.  

Notice how TM doesn't sat Trump is horrible?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, TMSAIL said:

Nope I think his character is horrible.  

 

Then why do you continually defend him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, billy backstay said:

 

Then why do you continually defend him?

Do I?   Seriously Billy you are a pretty straight shooter.   I defend SOME of his policies not all.   I know it is the normal mantra here to lump any and every positive comment into unending support, but that is not the reality.  I think the man is completely unsuited for the presidency.  His ego has no bounds and his personal attacks against any and all leave a lot to be desired.  Ironically some of the posters on PA are just like Trump in that regard. 

That said I believe in our form of government - that he was elected and should be allowed to serve.   If it turns out via the Mueller investigation that he broke the law I expect congress to act.   If he commits impeachable offenses that too should happen.  

Now you and I may disagree with what constitutes impeachment, but that too is covered by elections.  If the American public want a democratic congress to impeach Trump they will have that chance come November. 

Elections due have consequences  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Mid said:

never going to get that from one who's paid to have one . ;)

Paid?  That’s rich Coming from someone caught spreading HAMAS propaganda.   Butterfly bullets indeed. LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Uncooperative Tom said:

I agree with TM about his character.

But the hotel isn't being targeted due to character. It's being targeted due to politics and we all know it.

And that's why a "good moral character" requirement isn't an excellent legal ground for anything but a political attack on a business.

Of course it’s politically motivated.  Hard to claim a 5 star hotel is a blight on the neighborhood. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TMSAIL said:

Of course it’s politically motivated.  Hard to claim a 5 star hotel is a blight on the neighborhood. 

 

Anything with the name "TRUMP" on it is a blight on the neighborhood.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Clove Hitch said:

Anything with the name "TRUMP" on it is a blight on the neighborhood.  

Opinion not fact.  Looking at Trip advisor the Hotel is top rated despite the obvious Trolls writing bad reviews 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TMSAIL said:

Opinion not fact.  Looking at Trip advisor the Hotel is top rated despite the obvious Trolls writing bad reviews 

He has brought profound shame to our country and is a disgrace.  It has nothing to do with whether or not they make a good Taco salad. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Clove Hitch said:

He has brought profound shame to our country and is a disgrace.  It has nothing to do with whether or not they make a good Taco salad. 

Again opinion.  Not shared by millions of your fellow Americans.

Regardless This thread is about pulling a license from a Hotel because the snowflakes don’t like the president  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Uncooperative Tom said:

 

 that's why a "good moral character" requirement isn't an excellent legal ground for anything but a political attack on a business.

Probably shouldn't have it AS LAW in pretty much every license application in America then. Thanks biblethumpers

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Clove Hitch said:

Anything with the name "TRUMP" on it is a blight on the neighborhood.  

I pulled in to Trump Marina at Atlantic City Casino a number of years ago (I think it was 2008?). The surrounding neighborhood was blighted. The casino didn't improve it. The marina, though reasonably clean, was in disrepair and very poorly run. Poorly as in it was completely unstaffed. No one there. 

Politically motivated or not, the lawsuit has merit. Trump is of low character, and subject to the terms of his liquor license. I know of a guy who tried to open a pub, and his beer and wine license was rejected because his father owned a strip club. He had to sell the project to someone else to complete.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have Trump a tower in Chicago. 

Beautiful addition to the lake front and a vast improvement over the ugly Sun  Times building it replaced.  Hey BL there is a thread just waiting for you dealing with the Trump tower in Chicago.   I ask credit for the “TRUMP KILLS FISH” headline you are sure to write. Meow 

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, RKoch said:

I pulled in to Trump Marina at Atlantic City Casino a number of years ago (I think it was 2008?). The surrounding neighborhood was blighted. The casino didn't improve it. The marina, though reasonably clean, was in disrepair and very poorly run. Poorly as in it was completely unstaffed. No one there. 

Politically motivated or not, the lawsuit has merit. Trump is of low character, and subject to the terms of his liquor license. I know of a guy who tried to open a pub, and his beer and wine license was rejected because his father owned a strip club. He had to sell the project to someone else to complete.

You should have seen it before the casino and Marina.  That neighborhood and the city were blighted before and after.  That's why the Casino was put there in the first place to revitalize the city.  It worked for a while.  It started to decline again after other states saw the amount of money hitting the jersey shore and casinos were permitted in the other states around NYC.  Pennsylvania, Connecticut and New York itself started chasing the same dollars and getting them.  Atlantic City just reverted to what it was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In keeping with the thread title.

kUuht00m_normal.jpg

I want to take a moment to address the current illegal immigration crisis on the Southern Border...it has been going on for many, many decades... pic.twitter.com/1F7EK9Ef88

Dear mister Trump. You see this beautiful building? It’s the International Court of Justice in Our residency The Hague, the Netherlands. It’s waiting for you. It might take a while. But it’s waiting …



1529599025-dge44iuwkaebzpw.jpg

Official account of King Willem-Alexander : 
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, TMSAIL said:

Again opinion.  Not shared by millions of your fellow Americans.

Regardless This thread is about pulling a license from a Hotel because the snowflakes don’t like the president  

 

There is a law that says immoral pieces of shit can't get a liquor license.  Even you admit Trump is immoral and has horrible character.  He is not above the law, so no liquor license for him.  Simple 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Clove Hitch said:

There is a law that says immoral pieces of shit can't get a liquor license.  Even you admit Trump is immoral and has horrible character.  He is not above the law, so no liquor license for him.  Simple 

Somebody needs to write a law defining moral.

I see one of the plaintiffs is a baptist minister.  By their definition, drinking is immoral and they should be protesting every liquor license in DC.  If they don't, their moral standing is suspect.

Resolution No. 5
ON ALCOHOL USE IN AMERICA

WHEREAS, Years of research confirm biblical warnings that alcohol use leads to physical, mental, and emotional damage (e.g., Proverbs 23:29-35); and

WHEREAS, Alcohol use has led to countless injuries and deaths on our nation's highways; and

WHEREAS, The breakup of families and homes can be directly and indirectly attributed to alcohol use by one or more members of a family; and

WHEREAS, The use of alcohol as a recreational beverage has been shown to lead individuals down a path of addiction to alcohol and toward the use of other kinds of drugs, both legal and illegal; and

WHEREAS, There are some religious leaders who are now advocating the consumption of alcoholic beverages based on a misinterpretation of the doctrine of "our freedom in Christ"; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, That the messengers to the Southern Baptist Convention meeting in Greensboro, North Carolina, June 13-14, 2006, express our total opposition to the manufacturing, advertising, distributing, and consuming of alcoholic beverages; and be it further

RESOLVED, That we urge that no one be elected to serve as a trustee or member of any entity or committee of the Southern Baptist Convention that is a user of alcoholic beverages.

RESOLVED, That we urge Southern Baptists to take an active role in supporting legislation that is intended to curb alcohol use in our communities and nation; and be it further

RESOLVED, That we urge Southern Baptists to be actively involved in educating students and adults concerning the destructive nature of alcoholic beverages; and be it finally

RESOLVED, That we commend organizations and ministries that treat alcohol-related problems from a biblical perspective and promote abstinence and encourage local churches to begin and/or support such biblically-based ministries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TMSAIL said:

We have Trump a tower in Chicago. 

Beautiful addition to the lake front and a vast improvement over the ugly Sun  Times building it replaced. 

It's on the river, not The Lake. But yeah, the Sun Times building was a blight on the riverfront. I think Lake Point Tower...And the hotel they're building on Navy Pier are the only two that can claim being on The Lake. Heck, even Columbia Yacht Club is a freakin' boat!

[/hijack]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Clove Hitch said:

There is a law that says immoral pieces of shit can't get a liquor license.  Even you admit Trump is immoral and has horrible character.  He is not above the law, so no liquor license for him.  Simple 

Not simple.  Political games.  Most Hotel, bars, restaurants, casinos ect. are corporations.  Do license issuers look at every board member’s character?  How about every stock holder?  Following your loose standard every liqueur license in the country would be pulled. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, austin1972 said:

It's on the river, not The Lake. But yeah, the Sun Times building was a blight on the riverfront. I think Lake Point Tower...And the hotel they're building on Navy Pier are the only two that can claim being on The Lake. Heck, even Columbia Yacht Club is a freakin' boat!

[/hijack]

River is correct.  I was thinking the view, from the lake looking at the skyline.    

Little side note the builders of lake point towers found a loophole in the city ordinance on lake front building.  The site  was not covered because it was landfill.  That loop hole was closed after. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Saorsa said:

Somebody needs to write a law defining moral.

Should the term 'grab them on the pussy' be in the definition? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, LB 15 said:

Should the term 'grab them on the pussy' be in the definition? 

No.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TMSAIL said:

Not simple.  Political games.  Most Hotel, bars, restaurants, casinos ect. are corporations.  Do license issuers look at every board member’s character?  How about every stock holder?  Following your loose standard every liqueur license in the country would be pulled. 

It's disappointing, but not surprising, you think the so-called president is above the law.   And there are plenty of liquer stores run be people who don't grab women by the pussy. 

I encourage you to read the complaint.  It is detailed, researched and aligned with the law. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Clove Hitch said:

It's disappointing, but not surprising, you think the so-called president is above the law.   And there are plenty of liquer stores run be people who don't grab women by the pussy. 

I encourage you to read the complaint.  It is detailed, researched and aligned with the law. 

The law addresses owners.  Which in this case is not President Trump it is a corporation.  So again, unless they are checking the morals of every stock holder and board member of every corporation holding a liquor license. They have no case.  How about Paris Hilton. High morals?  Should the Hilton chain be threatened with the pulling of their licenses,  over her actions?  

There is no way this happens. If it does it will be a political decision that will be appealed Before the first water ring drys on the lounge bar top at Trump international. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TMSAIL said:

The law addresses owners.  Which in this case is not President Trump it is a corporation.  So again, unless they are checking the morals of every stock holder and board member of every corporation holding a liquor license. They have no case.  How about Paris Hilton. High morals?  Should the Hilton chain be threatened with the pulling of their licenses,  over her actions?  

There is no way this happens. If it does it will be a political decision that will be appealed Before the first water ring drys on the lounge bar top at Trump international. 

I encourage you to read the complaint and base your argument on that.  You have not addressed a single item in the complaint.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, TMSAIL said:

Who’s sock is Fakenews?  In that you will find your answer as to why BENT who was not even part of the discussion was included.  Attention whore seeks new audience comes to mind.  

Give it a rest, TMSAIL. You clearly think he's my sock, you've been hinting at it a few times now. At least man up and own that.

Thing is - I don't have any other accounts but this one on this site. Don't need nor want one. I just got tired of responding to all the bullshit. I came to SA for the sailing, not for the political trolling. I simply refocused on that portion of the site.

But hey, now you're imagining me behind every new account that takes issue with your shit. Truly a sign you've moved on from your fixation on me. Seriously, get over it. It's kind of sad how you and Jeffie need my response to validate your opinions. :rolleyes: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Clove Hitch said:

I encourage you to read the complaint and base your argument on that.  You have not addressed a single item in the complaint.  

Ok l read it.  It falls apart when they try to claim Trump is the owner.  Even in their filing they admit that he no longer has any position in the company. He signed the permits as PRESIDENT of the company running the hotel.  He no longer holds that or any other position in the company.  Case over

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Bent Sailor said:

I came to SA for the sailing, not for the political trolling. I simply refocused on that portion of the site.

Fucking gold. I have never seen you post in any sailing thread ever, only here in PA were you like nothing more than creating your long, tiresome, nit picking-multi quote posts or publishing your 1000 word biased and dull political essays. You remind me of a 13 year old girl who only wants to score points or play 'No you said'. 

You should 'refocus' on getting a life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TMSAIL said:

Ok l read it.  It falls apart when they try to claim Trump is the owner.  Even in their filing they admit that he no longer has any position in the company. He signed the permits as PRESIDENT of the company running the hotel.  He no longer holds that or any other position in the company.  Case over

Was the permit issued when he was PRESIDENT of the company?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, MR.CLEAN said:
15 hours ago, Uncooperative Tom said:

 

 that's why a "good moral character" requirement isn't an excellent legal ground for anything but a political attack on a business.

Probably shouldn't have it AS LAW in pretty much every license application in America then. Thanks biblethumpers

Including a law license, which pretty much says it all...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Clove Hitch said:

Was the permit issued when he was PRESIDENT of the company?

Sure. So what?

You renew all your city licenses each year.  At least in every city I’ve operated a company in. It’s one way cities generate revenue.  The current general manager of the hotel most likely has and has been signing the licenses   

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, TMSAIL said:

Sure. So what?

You renew all your city licenses each year.  At least in every city I’ve operated a company in. It’s one way cities generate revenue.  The current general manager of the hotel most likely has and has been signing the licenses   

 

So the initial license was issued in error- against the law of the municipality.  Thus it should be revoked and let them submit a new application. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Clove Hitch said:

So the initial license was issued in error- against the law of the municipality.  Thus it should be revoked and let them submit a new application. 

How is it against the law? Seems you need a judge to say that.  

Do you think this law suit would have been filed if Trump had not run and won  the presidency?  It’s  a simple yes or no. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, TMSAIL said:

How is it against the law? Seems you need a judge to say that.  

Do you think this law suit would have been filed if Trump had not run and won  the presidency?  It’s  a simple yes or no. 

TMSAIL.jpg.2bd946f550970d622c397ea65e41f04f.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, TMSAIL said:

How is it against the law? Seems you need a judge to say that.  

Do you think this law suit would have been filed if Trump had not run and won  the presidency?  It’s  a simple yes or no. 

Certainly.  The spotlight on him brought revealed to many people what a piece of shit he is.

Again, you aren't addressing the complaint at all.  It was issued in error. Trump was not illegible for a liqueur licence on account of being a pussy grabbing piece of shit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/20/2018 at 5:33 PM, lonesailor said:

So not what you would do, like give scary guns to possible felon?

I see why you call yourself lonesailor the shit that comes out of your mouth would stink out any cockpit 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Bent Sailor said:

Give it a rest, TMSAIL. You clearly think he's my sock, you've been hinting at it a few times now. At least man up and own that.

Thing is - I don't have any other accounts but this one on this site. Don't need nor want one. I just got tired of responding to all the bullshit. I came to SA for the sailing, not for the political trolling. I simply refocused on that portion of the site.

But hey, now you're imagining me behind every new account that takes issue with your shit. Truly a sign you've moved on from your fixation on me. Seriously, get over it. It's kind of sad how you and Jeffie need my response to validate your opinions. :rolleyes: 

Image result for donald duck laughing gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/21/2018 at 6:46 AM, TMSAIL said:

 Now you and I may disagree with what constitutes impeachment, but that too is covered by elections.  If the American public want a democratic congress to impeach Trump they will have that chance come November. 

Elections due have consequences  

Elections DO have consequences. 

Any way, the paragraph above illustrates the problem.  

Why is it that a REPUBLICAN Congress will not impeach President Trump, assuming he is found to have committed impeachable offense(s)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Clove Hitch said:

It was issued in error. Trump was not illegible for a liqueur licence on account of being a pussy grabbing piece of shit. 

Snaggy? That's more readable than usual. What are you doing to Clove Hitch's account?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

Elections DO have consequences. 

Any way, the paragraph above illustrates the problem.  

Why is it that a REPUBLICAN Congress will not impeach President Trump, assuming he is found to have committed impeachable offense(s)?

I hope that if cause is found when Mueller's investigation concludes, that that indeed does happen. Right now?  There are lots of people who just don't like him, and not liking him isn't enough to impeach, unless someone wants to start a civil war. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

Elections DO have consequences. 

Any way, the paragraph above illustrates the problem.  

Why is it that a REPUBLICAN Congress will not impeach President Trump, assuming he is found to have committed impeachable offense(s)?

How do you know that they won't?  They would still hold the White House even if Trump was impeached.

Shouldn't they wait until some impeachable offense is found?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, A guy in the Chesapeake said:

I hope that if cause is found when Mueller's investigation concludes, that that indeed does happen. Right now?  There are lots of people who just don't like him, and not liking him isn't enough to impeach, unless someone wants to start a civil war. 

 

Yep my point exactly many here believe he has already done enough to be impeached.  I would hope that if legitimate charges are proven congress would do its job regardless of political party

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, TMSAIL said:

Yep my point exactly many here believe he has already done enough to be impeached.  I would hope that if legitimate charges are proven congress would do its job regardless of political party

TMSAIL.jpg.fac681286cd2be4df2b73c2c3e2e0ed0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

Elections DO have consequences. 

Any way, the paragraph above illustrates the problem.  

Why is it that a REPUBLICAN Congress will not impeach President Trump, assuming he is found to have committed impeachable offense(s)?

Maybe they don't want Pence.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, TMSAIL said:

Yep my point exactly many here believe he has already done enough to be impeached.  I would hope that if legitimate charges are proven congress would do its job regardless of political party

The case can already be made for impeachment given available info on the grounds of maladministration. 

Whats important is the political nature of the debate. That’s why Mueller is relevant. And Stormy. And immigrant kids. And trade wars. All can affect the swing of the political pendulum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Shortforbob said:

Maybe they don't want Pence.

 

Don’t knock it, it’s a pretty good decision. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, phillysailor said:

The case can already be made for impeachment given available info on the grounds of maladministration

Whats important is the political nature of the debate. That’s why Mueller is relevant. And Stormy. And immigrant kids. And trade wars. All can affect the swing of the political pendulum.

Every administration could have a case made for maladministration.  That simply means someone on the other side doesn’t like their policies.  

The roll out of Obamacare would be an example from the Obama administration 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, TMSAIL said:

Every administration could have a case made for maladministration.  That simply means someone on the other side doesn’t like their policies.  

The roll out of Obamacare would be an example from the Obama administration 

Exactly....And in democratic countries the verdict is rendered by the people on election day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites