Lark

Frigate on the rocks, 7th fleet innocent.

Recommended Posts

I hope they can get started ASAP on pumping out those fuel tanks.  

That little ship is pretty well toast, I'd think....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess this means they failed their navigation training.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gotta love the way those containment booms are having zero effect

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Parma said:

gotta love the way those containment booms are having zero effect

They don't seem to be doing much good, beyond rotating stock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tow it beyond the environment and call it a day.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, bigrpowr said:

tow it beyond the environment and call it a day.

They have to wait for the front to fall off, I think that's the rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a replay never hurt anybody , ever.

 

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess it wasn't built fjord tough. 

 

Glad all are ok. 

  • Like 13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

F-100 frigate built in Spain, I went to the launch of two of these in my hometown, maybe even this one's...

Those are nice ships, Australia bought five as well, IIRC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, kent_island_sailor said:

Is the front still on?

The back looks a mess

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, chuso007 said:

F-100 frigate built in Spain, I went to the launch of two of these in my hometown, maybe even this one's...

Those are nice ships, Australia bought five as well, IIRC.

They look very capable, but it's an awful shame for an accident like this to happen.

I have not seen our news over hear mention casualties.

FB- Doug

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering the Blucher is still on the bottom of Oslofjord, I suppose getting it over to the edge saves a lot of recovery effort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, P_Wop said:

I hope they can get started ASAP on pumping out those fuel tanks.  

That little ship is pretty well toast, I'd think....

hardly..   there have been worse

 

1461495.jpg.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, AnotherSailor said:

Curious! I thought this was a US specialty. Those Norwegians must be paying attention to how not to pay attention.

It was a NATO joint effort im sure

 

EDIT: It in fact WAS a NATO joint US/Norway effort lmaooooo:

Quote

The frigate was conducting navigation training with other elements of Standing NATO Maritime Group 1 in the fjord following the Nov. 7 conclusion of the Trident Juncture 2018 exercise, NATO said. Helga Ingstadcollided with the fully loaded Sola TS just after the tanker had departed the oil terminal. Ships from the group remain nearby to support the recovery efforts as needed, NATO said.

The U.S. amphibious warship USS Iwo Jima (LHD-7) is also operating nearby off the coast of Norway. So far, the U.S. Navy has not been asked to assist in the recovery efforts, U.S. Naval Forces Europe spokesman Capt. John Perkins told USNI News on Thursday morning.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was grounded intentionally to save the ship.

For a light frigate to get hit by a tanker, some people obviously failed at their jobs.

OTOH? It is a testament to the quality of these frigates that no one was killed and the ship wasn't cut in half. The frigate is like 5000 tons vs. the tanker 100,000. Destroyers have been cut in half by collisions with far lighter ships. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Elegua said:

Guess it wasn't built fjord tough. 

 

Glad all are ok. 

Holy shit.  You just won everything in this thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Grrr... said:

Holy shit.  You just won everything in this thread.

Yeah, thanks. I was thinking this morning that the Norwegians have really taken the, "Aegis Ashore", concept to a new level. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"The tanker, which was heading northbound, contacted the frigate, heading southbound, to ask if they had a plan to safely pass them as they seemed to be on a collision course," Kjetil Stormark, the editor of AldriMer.no told the BBC.

Citing what he called key sources, he said: "The response was: 'We have everything under control.'"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was July 7th and I took one of the  Commodores twin daughter here on vacation from the all girl college down to the group of large rocks at the end of the jetty. It was a very hot day. We started fooling around. She must have been new to this as she appeared to be quite frigid. After a few cherry fizz wine coolers she started to loosen up and started to enjoy our activities  when all of a sudde...... on what? Frigate on the rocks , Oh never mind 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, AnotherSailor said:

Curious! I thought this was a US specialty. Those Norwegians must be paying attention to how not to pay attention.

We have the highest operational tempo, protecting everyone else's ass. It's easy to keep your ships safe when they never leave port.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Grande Mastere Dreade said:

hardly..   there have been worse

Maybe.  But at least that one wasn't lying on her side, half submerged and abandoned with water sloshing around in all her aft spaces. 

But the Norwegians are resourceful people, and they'll probably fix her up.  Perhaps send her back to Spain?  Will be a toss-up between cost of a re-build and a new one with parts saved off the old one, I'd think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given modular construction of large ships in the first place, seems like they could just build a new stern and pretend they are building a new one with a big head start since the front end is already there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, P_Wop said:

Maybe.  But at least that one wasn't lying on her side, half submerged and abandoned with water sloshing around in all her aft spaces. 

But the Norwegians are resourceful people, and they'll probably fix her up.  Perhaps send her back to Spain?  Will be a toss-up between cost of a re-build and a new one with parts saved off the old one, I'd think.

hold my beer

costa-concordia-archives-hero.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Grande Mastere Dreade said:

hold my beer

costa-concordia-archives-hero.jpg

Lets buzz the beach before moving on down the coast!

Uh oh, what was that noise?

- Stumbling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly they paid far too much attention to US Navy navigation procedures...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Russian "non-targets" of the war games must be laughing their heads off.

"ey Vlad, no need more polish Kusnetsov. Stoopid guys sink self in own backyard".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/9/2018 at 5:02 PM, Grande Mastere Dreade said:

hardly..   there have been worse

 

 

You sure?

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRZ_HgEUiTia7zqZMYHz2r

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.naval-technology.com/projects/nansen/

She has a steel hull and 13 compartments, but the gash looks like it may involve several machinery spaces.    At least some of the electronics may have stayed dry.    The slick was reportedly helicopter fuel, so it evaporated faster then diesel.   

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-08/500-milllion-norwegian-frigate-rammed-oil-tanker

DCB15933-04E6-4A35-BC46-AF9FBC457226.jpeg

8704ACF7-2A43-46D3-87A3-476319D12FD1.jpeg

C43938DB-015E-4C3E-9549-0E1F7C2FF9E2.jpeg

AB6AEFA6-3E1B-4954-A2E4-04060876AA38.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bulbous bows always cause a lot of damage at exactly the wrong place. Massive flooding in engine compartment. Seriously regardless of failings of those at the helm a tribute to crew getting out alive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Miffy said:

Bulbous bows always cause a lot of damage at exactly the wrong place. Massive flooding in engine compartment. Seriously regardless of failings of those at the helm a tribute to crew getting out alive.

No doubt.     Also some fast decisions must have been made to call the tugs and have them ground her before it was too late.   The right people must have had the authority and made the right calls.    

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/24828/norwegian-frigate-to-oil-tanker-before-collision-we-have-everything-under-control.  This article, if accurate, sheds more light on the errors preceding the wreck.  It matches the quote KC375 provided.   I know COLREG always attaches some blame to both vessels, but if a stand on visiting civilian vessel radios a government vessel and is basically told to hold course, doesn’t that change things?

"The tanker, which was heading northbound, contacted the frigate, heading southbound, to ask if they had a plan to safely pass them as they seemed to be on a collision course," Kjetil Stormark, top editor at AldriMer.no, told the BBCin a subsequent interview. "The response was: 'We have everything under control.'"

"The tanker, which was heading northbound, contacted the frigate, heading southbound, to ask if they had a plan to safely pass them as they seemed to be on a collision course," Kjetil Stormark, top editor at AldriMer.no, told the BBCin a subsequent interview. "The response was: 'We have everything under control.'" more galling, it appears likely that the Helge Ingstad was in constant communication with the Fedje Maritime Traffic Center, or Fedje VTS, which is responsible for coordinating all maritime traffic in the fjord in question. The congested nature of the waterway, especially with all the traffic coming out of Sture and the main port in Bergen, means that any ship over 80 feet long, including military vessels, has to get approval from Fedje at least an hour in advance in order to enter the area, to begin with. The Fridtjof Nansen-class frigates are 440 feet long, well over this length requirement.

Per AldriMer.no's sources, Fedje VTS was indeed in contact with both ships and issued repeated warnings about a possible collision to no avail. It is not clear if either ship made a mayday call once it became clear the accident was inevitable. It does appear that Helge Ingstad only turned on her Automatic Identification System (AIS) transporter after the mishap had occurred.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's totally the frigate's fault. There's no way for the 100,000 ton fully laden tanker just underway to avoid the situation. Turn port it could ground itself and cause ecological disaster. Turn starboard it would have hit frigate amidships or bow to bow. 

Frigate has acceleration and turning radius of a sports car compared to the tanker. The tug escort avoided the situation. The frigate did not. Because destroyer jockeys almost always drive like this. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least the Norwegians have adequate salvage ability.   The Russians are in a bit of a pickle since they sank their floating drydock from underneath their aircraft carrier.    The Ukrainians aren’t going to let them use Mykolaiv, Europe doesn’t have much love for Putin.   https://www.rferl.org/a/for-russia-s-navy-a-damaged-aircraft-carrier-is-bad-enough-a-sunken-dry-dock-is-even-worse-/29593113.html

E52F06F3-E4B2-44F5-9AAC-3DEA07BC757D.jpeg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Lark said:

At least the Norwegians have adequate salvage ability.   The Russians are in a bit of a pickle since they sank their floating drydock from underneath their aircraft carrier.    The Ukrainians aren’t going to let them use Mykolaiv, Europe doesn’t have much love for Putin.   https://www.rferl.org/a/for-russia-s-navy-a-damaged-aircraft-carrier-is-bad-enough-a-sunken-dry-dock-is-even-worse-/29593113.html

E52F06F3-E4B2-44F5-9AAC-3DEA07BC757D.jpeg

Wow, from that angle, that ship almost looks like an aircraft carrier!

FB- Doug (ex-BT1 USN)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russian carrier with their turbo boilers that spew smoke and one breakdown away from being an open ocean wreck. Always deployed with tugboats. 

 

Prob better left sunk in the sunken dry dock than trying to make it operational. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A norwegian newspaper got the sound log from the local marine traffic control station , Fede VTS ( there are lots of refineries and traffic in the area and reporting to Fede VTS is mandatory minimum 1 hour before you enter their controlled area). I guess someone thought: fuck I’m not losing my job over this 

 

after some one back and forth the tanker (Sola TS ) and Fedje VTS conclude that the 17knot radarshadow coming straight for the tanker  might be KNM Helge Ingstad (who have reported that they are in the area but have lights off and no AIS transponder on). They call them and HI reply

1min before crash:

Sola TS: Helge Ingstad go Starboard immediately 

HI: then we will go to close to “Blokkene” ( note: not clear what they mean with blokkene )

S: turn sb if it is you coming towards me, you’ve got.....

silence for ten seconds 

HI: I have a couple of degrees SB when we have passed’ eh, eh, SB

S: HI you need to do something. You are starting to get very close

 

15 second silence 

S: HI!turn!

3second silence 

S: we’ll have a collision here then

15 s silence 

s: Fedje VTS. It might have been a warship. I hit it

 

Then follows mayday, calling for tugs etc can’t. Interesting to listen to, but unfortunately in Norwegian . Court martial next

 

 

Edited by AndreasE
Missed one sentence
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Miffy said:

It's totally the frigate's fault. There's no way for the 100,000 ton fully laden tanker just underway to avoid the situation. Turn port it could ground itself and cause ecological disaster. Turn starboard it would have hit frigate amidships or bow to bow. 

Frigate has acceleration and turning radius of a sports car compared to the tanker. The tug escort avoided the situation. The frigate did not. Because destroyer jockeys almost always drive like this. 

 

 

Pretty much what I said when the Whale Warriors got their carbon trimaran smashed by a big, lumbering hulk. A hulk smaller than this frigate, I believe, but it's all relative.

Whatever the rules of the road may say, it's always a skipper's job to avoid trading paint. If a big, lumbering hulk hits your smaller, faster, boat, that's your fault in my view unless you can prove something very unusual about the situation.

On 11/9/2018 at 12:43 PM, KC375 said:

"The tanker, which was heading northbound, contacted the frigate, heading southbound, to ask if they had a plan to safely pass them as they seemed to be on a collision course," Kjetil Stormark, the editor of AldriMer.no told the BBC.

Citing what he called key sources, he said: "The response was: 'We have everything under control.'"

If a big, lumbering hulk hits your smaller, faster, boat, that's your fault in my view unless you can prove something very unusual about the situation. Especially if you just said you had it under control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll continue to remind that there has never been a 100% fault finding against any party to a collision .

COLREGS preamble explains why .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s interesting reading what everyone has said about the collision and I still love the Clark and Dawe “the front fell off” I could watch it over and over again. 

 

When you you look at each of the ships the naval ship I believe should of given way to the tanker. The size differences  and draft in the 2 ships means the tanker had very few option to get out of the way 

 

War ship KNM Helge Ingstad       Tanker Sola TS

length                  134 m                                    250

beam.                  16.8 m.                                44 m 

draft                  4.6 m.                                    13.1 m 

displacement  5290 tons                            62557 tons         

                                                                        112939 tons loaded 

speed max        27 knots.                            11 knots 

 

So if you look at the basic stats of both vessels the frigate had less draft, was shorter, was half the size of the tanker and could of very easily got out of the way of the tanker. It’s the old thing of “Might has Right”  for the tanker and the naval officer just being pigheaded and not moving out of the way of the tanker. 

 

I keep thinking of the old story 

 

US Warship doing 30 knots and on collision course with radar contact. 

 

Warship captain radios 

I’m a US warship closing in fast on you, you must alter course and get out of my way.

 

Voice on the other end radios back 

No, I’ll not alter my course. You must alter your course. 

 

Warship captain radios again getting pissed off 

You must get out of our way or we will run over you, I’m not going to alter my course. 

 

Voice on the other end saids again 

No I’m not going to alter my course, you must alter yours now. 

 

Warship captain is very pissed off and radios back one final time 

This is US warship alter your course or I’ll blow you out of the water.

 

Voice on the other end saids 

I’m a light house, it’s your call 

 

pulpit 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Found a link showing the AIS path of the tanker.  It is fascinating (and instructive) to see the huge turning radius, and how the ship's track  continues in one direction despite their heading and the tugs pushing it in another.   Keep clear of these guys - they can't turn or stop!

 

https://gcaptain.com/video-ais-animation-shows-collision-between-oil-tanker-and-norwegian-frigate/

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hearing the "play by play", even if you don't understand Norwegian, was fascinating.

It really appears that there was no communication between the radio room and the bridge about the actual situation they're in.  Both traffic control AND the tanker were warning the frigate of the impeding problem.  Each department on the warship (radar, radio, watches, bridge, mess, engines, etc.) seems to just focus on it's tiny piece of the puzzle and no one seems to be coordinating it so as to come to an overall understanding.  Was this what happened in the 7th fleet's collisions too?   

It was interesting to hear that the frigate was able to report their number of crew to traffic control immediately, while the tanker had to stop to  count them up before replying.  The time lapses between transmissions - as things are happening on board each vessel - make for great suspense-building. Thanks, nolatom.  

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎11‎/‎11‎/‎2018 at 3:47 AM, Mid said:

I'll continue to remind that there has never been a 100% fault finding against any party to a collision .

COLREGS preamble explains why .

Well, it's not common, but 100% / 0% collision cases do happen:

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/564/729/1407350/

But you're right, the stand-on vessel has definite duties to react, no matter how badly the give-way vessel has screwed up, so zero-fault is a pretty rare bird.  And  cases where the facts are that one-sided, generally never make it to a courtroom or particularly to trial, they get settled instead.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a disaster! That's not a small ship. The old Fletcher class that was the US Navy's mainstay right on up to the late sixties was only 2500 tons loaded and about 375 feet long, if I recall. This thing is right between that and an Arleigh Burke class, I recon. Lots of oil and other contaminants must be leaking into that fragile ecosystem not to mention the hazards to navigation in a confined fjord that will undoubtedly arise from recovery efforts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, PaulK said:

It was interesting to hear that the frigate was able to report their number of crew to traffic control immediately, while the tanker had to stop to  count them up before replying.  

But the frigate got its number wrong. Reported 134, but they were 137.

”done is better than perfect” approach of Mark Zucherberg fame is not always the solution. Sometimes you should spend some extra seconds and get it right:-)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now