Mid

2018 Rolex Sydney Hobart Yacht Race: The Race Committee has lodged a protest against Wild Oats XI

Recommended Posts

I'm just wondering what a mental health professional would make of LB's hard drive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I'm guessing LB's daily dress code includes something clipped to his belt.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s finally here the big kahuna. The number you labored through minutes, hours and days over the last 4 weeks.

Endured sore keyboard fingers and blistered brains for those with cerebral palsy that can only do weird memes. The angry posters, their even angrier socks, threats of deformation, deformers of the truth, trojan horses, vigilantes, WOXI death squads and the fire breathing supporters of the CYC.

And now it is here, the thing those chided as the online chatterati have been waiting for, week four of this threads stats. 

Total Posts: 3,074  (3,672)

Average Posts per Week: 769  (77)

Average Posts per Day: 110   (11)

Total Thread Views: 65,250  (156,404)

Average Thread Views per Week: 16,313  (3,258)

Average Thread Views per Day: 2,330  (465)

Note S2H 2018 Race thread in (   ).

 

Take a bow you minions, but make sure your disguises don't slip off, or you will end up in a deformed suitcase.

tenor_(2).gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, LB... Mumbles emailed me today and I quote..

" For fucks sake Paps, get over the fucking G1 painting will you! I was selling a fucking book!

This Oatley gig is going pear shaped mate, I'm telling you.

Please tell that fucking Yarpy to shut the fuck up!

We were close to pulling the trigger on your "stand up guy" scenario and Bam, he brings in Judge Judy!

I'm relying on you man, you owe me.

You do still have those negs of me and Glads right?
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually LB, you have crossed a line. I'm not comfortable with that. As soon as you typed Papsmear you were doomed.

Would any of you fathers in here send your daughters of to LB school?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going to sign off but something inside me won't let that happen.

Hoppy, you are a sick bastard as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, paps49 said:

Actually LB, you have crossed a line. I'm not comfortable with that. As soon as you typed Papsmear you were doomed.

Would any of you fathers in here send your daughters of to LB school?

You think that Lb is an outlier from the home of bjelke peterson and his crew, katter, hanson, palmer and anning?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, paps49 said:

Would any of you fathers in here send your daughters of to LB school?

Well not really unless they had some spooky stuff happening down below, I'm pretty sure LB said he went to an all boys school?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, jack_sparrow said:

Well not really unless they had some spooky stuff happening down below, I'm pretty sure LB said he went to an all boys school?

His sailing school ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Trickypig said:

His sailing school ?

No under legislation I don't think you can discriminate between any of the 9 possible genders anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, jack_sparrow said:

Well not really unless they had some spooky stuff happening down below, I'm pretty sure LB said he went to an all boys school?

Back then, girls weren't allowed an education.  It made marriage easier.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, frant said:

I am running a closely controlled experiment on my AIS / VHF splitter this weekend. We have the FOS at my home club Geelong this weekend as well as the Cadel Evans cycling races. There will be heaps of television helicopter action directly over the marina as the road race circuits directly adjacent to the marina and the choppers fly overhead each lap. I will leave my AIS on Tx mode all weekend until it is fried. Last year I noted that the fried dim sims from the food vendors were overdone, clearly the effect of tv microwave. Conclusive evidence is about to be presented, if not the splitter then a nuked dim sim will have to suffice. 

Good luck, it sounds like we'll get to the bottom of this.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, frant said:

I am running a closely controlled experiment on my AIS / VHF splitter this weekend. 

Mate hope you make it and if not make sure your affairs are in order.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, paps49 said:

I was going to sign off but something inside me won't let that happen.

What is it inside you cup cake? Fear? Hate? Stupidity? Michael Jackson’s other glove? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, paps49 said:

Actually LB, you have crossed a line. I'm not comfortable with that. As soon as you typed Papsmear you were doomed.

Doomed? To what? Another of your attempts at humour? You could always sue me for defamation...

Bwahahahahahaha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, LB 15 said:

Doomed? To what? Another of your attempts at humour? You could always sue me for defamation...

Bwahahahahahaha.

Why do your posts always sound like the schoolyard bully from some lowbrow soapy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Trickypig said:

Why do your posts always sound like the schoolyard bully from some lowbrow soapy?

I don’t really know - does it bring back traumatic memory’s of your old schools days sweet pea? If I had my time again I wouldn’t have been so nasty to you fat weezy kids with the high pitched voices. I am sorry mate, fifth grade must have been 3 of the hardest years of your life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, LB 15 said:

I don’t really know - does it bring back traumatic memory’s of your old schools days sweet pea? If I had my time again I wouldn’t have been so nasty to you fat weezy kids with the high pitched voices. I am sorry mate, fifth grade must have been 3 of the hardest years of your life.

Can't get out of character I see.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When's the next interesting race to follow? I guess this thread will stay active until then at least....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Ease the sheet. said:

You think that Lb is an outlier from the home of bjelke peterson and his crew, katter, hanson, palmer and anning?

Well I'm not completely sure about the others but I'm certain him and Anning are pretty tight, if you get my drift. They shop at the same gimp boutique.

2 hours ago, LB 15 said:

Doomed? To what? Another of your attempts at humour? You could always sue me for defamation...

Bwahahahahahaha.

Oh no Lying Bastard I was thing more along the lines of public defecation, you have a nasty habit of leaving turds everywhere you go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Ease the sheet. said:

Back then, girls weren't allowed an education.  It made marriage easier.

Thats why Lying Bastard went the child bride route. The only drawback is you have to replace them every few years as they "wise up".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Trickypig said:

Why do your posts always sound like the schoolyard bully from some lowbrow soapy?

He likes cheater and liars; what did you expect?  Heck he even likes that fat friend of Larry that cracked your AC boat in half and sunk it years ago.  T-minus 5 pages or 11 months.  Nice job on another page though!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mate stay safe and I hope you have a sign up saying "Experiment Under Way" otherwise passers by are going to think you are a bit weird.

images (13).jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, frant said:

I’m only a lightweight  at this game though and LB carrying all that flab around can’t even get down to cruiserweight fight trim. He’s that flabby I doubt that he can even throw a punch let alone a knockout blow.

Don't look a gift horse in the mouth. Without LB and Hoppy in the ring, this thread wouldn't be in the double digits. I'm thinking Australia Day Honours material.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, frant said:

I’m only a lightweight  at this game though

You do at least understand the rules. 

A tip for the newbies. You can't actually win. But you score by getting someone else to rise to your bait. You don't ever score by rising to someone else's bait. Right now I image LB sitting in his boat wondering if he has snagged a cray pot or worse, then realising he is dead in the water because his trawling net is utterly filled.*

Back to the popcorn.

*I can't remember when trawling on the Interwebs changed its spelling to trolling, but it was a very long time ago. An image of trolls sitting under bridges waiting for naive newcomers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, frant said:

I think I may have “ inadvertently “ pressed the silent mode switch at 15.43 in above scenario.

Mate this is not sounding like a controlled experiment or you are on your tenth beer. Tip: Go buy some cable ties to mechanically support that wiring birds nest :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, frant said:

Or the Australian team has just rec’d a shipment of 80 grit emery cloth.

I think they have learned their lesson about utilising marginal ball flight changing techniques.

1.jpg

In Sailing similar mechanical means are now appearing for securing positional advantage on the pitch. The only difference is they belt the splitter with the log. 

images (17).jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jack_sparrow said:

Go buy some cable ties to mechanically support that wiring :-)

Yes!  The OCD in me was itching....   

Don't underestimate how much grief being untidy with the wiring can bring in the future. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Francis Vaughan said:

You do at least understand the rules. 

A tip for the newbies. You can't actually win. But you score by getting someone else to rise to your bait. You don't ever score by rising to someone else's bait. Right now I image LB sitting in his boat wondering if he has snagged a cray pot or worse, then realising he is dead in the water because his trawling net is utterly filled.*

Back to the popcorn.

*I can't remember when trawling on the Interwebs changed its spelling to trolling, but it was a very long time ago. An image of trolls sitting under bridges waiting for naive newcomers.

Good advise, but sadly stops a lot of new people entering the fray. Whether they have something interesting to add or otherwise.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And this is the guy teaching people how to sail, he should be limited to teaching people how to fish.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops there's another fish in his smelly boat.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, frant said:

Here a serious technical  question for Francis and Jack. The white coax cable with gold plated plug sitting on top of the AIS transponder is the other end of a digital VHF whip antennae mounted on the stern rail. Was previously used as the AIS antennae before the installation of an AIS splitter to masthead antennae. Should I leave the end where it is so that I can readily replace the connection to the AIS transponder in the event that the splitter is fried and becomes Rx only for AIS. Or should I pull the connector and cable back into the compartment above leaving it hanging next to the splitter so that I can swap out the masthead antennae in the event that the rig comes down and the masthead whip can’t get a signal out from under water? 

I am starting to think that it is more likely that a chopper will crash into and take my rig out rather than fry the splitter.

Don't discard your arse as an option, most people miss that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, Jesus this is getting creepy. Obviously word has spread at the Gimp shop.... 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, frant said:

It’s not actually as bad as it looks.  The runs from individual peices of equipment are actually quite neat. It’s mainly the proprietary cables with factory termination that are looped and cable clipped together to reduce the length. That is all “stored” as seen. It does allow the stuff, ie AIS transceiver, AIS silent mode switch, Ockham “ brain” ( programmed in basic with a micro card memory), Fleetbroadband terminal and SSC. All hooked together with USB cables. At least can pull the stuff out to work on while still connected.

Actually the Ockham and AIS transceiver have RS232 outputs which are fitted with a USB converter in there as well. 

image.png.da0a0358c07b5520f14205cf709c1520.png

Nothing wrong there!

Look, Its even got a cable tie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, frant said:

I am starting to think that it is more likely that a chopper will crash into and take my rig out rather than fry the splitter.

Exactly, you have answered your own question. 

In the event the alien black helos start frying splitters you will have plenty of time to think about rethreading cables. If the stick comes down, you probably don't want any more pain, but you do want both VHF and AIS.

These sort of thoughts are why I like to see really neat wiring in any installation. You want everything to be neat, know exactly where every connection goes, and not have a rats nest to deal with if you have to re-cable or connect something in a hurry - and in the dark.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Francis Vaughan said:

 These sort of thoughts are why I like to see really neat wiring in any installation.  You want everything to be neat, know exactly where every connection goes, and not have a rats nest to deal with if you have to re-cable or connect something in a hurry - and in the dark.

Putting aside mechanical damage to cores of any cable via simply a vessels motion,  correct isolation of power and easily corruptable data cabling via RFI interference etc, also think about if you are sinking in daylight or dark.

Also think about those vessels you are thinking of buying or selling (majority of buyers go on looks having no idea how it all works) comparing electronic rats nests to those without when percieved $ values are determined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, paps49 said:

Heppy Amnesia day everybody.

To assist any Australian burdened with celebrating Australia Day with say a 1/16 aboriginal sister-in-law or neighbour banging on how you and Captain Cook invaded their country.

The last half of this my post from last year in the Captain Cook thread down the hallway referencing Dampier might help you shut the fuckers up until next year.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, paps49 said:

Good advise, but sadly stops a lot of new people entering the fray. Whether they have something interesting to add or otherwise.

Paps that is a two edged sword/sieve.

Firstly any fuckwits are going to be circumspect about entering the fray beyond the opening pages where they thought AIS stood for the Australian Institute of Sport and they saw WOXI on the Tracker all the time do what is the fuss?

By way of example here is a comment from WOXI's own FaceFuck page when they heard the RC had protested thinking the RC was the Royal Club (actually they were closer than they knew there) courtesy of a Black Jack panty split taking a complaint off the water. With my emphasis.

"Everyone with internet access had exact location of all boats. Black Jack should be ashamed of themselves. It was a perfectly clean race from a spectator point. It makes me sick that the world is again seeing such disgraceful unAustralian  sportsmanship."

Paps does this thread honestly beyond the opening pages need imbiciles like this? If so it would be the longest thread in SA history. So the sieve works. It works because people get very quickly educated as posters or viewers.

Remember these stats from my post of yesterday celebrating a thread that has lasted 4 weeks and ordinarily should be as dead as a fuckin doornail by now.

On 1/25/2019 at 6:38 PM, jack_sparrow said:

And now it is here, the thing those chided as the online chatterati have been waiting for, week four of this threads stats. 

Total Posts: 3,074  (3,672)

Average Posts per Week: 769  (77)

Average Posts per Day: 110   (11)

Total Thread Views: 65,250  (156,404)

Average Thread Views per Week: 16,313  (3,258)

Average Thread Views per Day: 2,330  (465)

Note S2H 2018 Race thread in (   ).

Yet Total Posts of 3,074 in just four weeks approaching the number of posts for the entire S2H 2018 Race thread of 3,672 which has been going for 11 months? Total Thread Views here of 65,250 in 4 weeks or Average Thread Views per Week of 16,313, compared to 3,258 for that main race thread. That indicates there is a fuckin truckload of sailing individuals around the globe interested enough to dial in.

Now for anyone who wants to chime in say this thread is only being kept alive now by a few stalwets and that is the thrust of Paps post which I here do reply. My answer is this. I could not agree with you more.

However I offer up this observation. Putting aside those few stalwets that doesn't explain Total Posts of 3,074, Average Posts per Week of 769 and Average Posts per Day of 110 over four weeks who are those posters? Sure there has been thread drift and comments on weird memes. Which reminds me I have yet to reply to @frant AIS technical cabling request.

The bottom line is of those 3,074 posts not one person from memory has come out with either a substantiated opinion that this thread is a "storm in a teacup" (borrowing Richo's own words in that damming Channel 2 Interview) or even putting up challenging arguments to those put up here which are many and either rational or not. Most are along the lines of something is 'Rotten in the State of Denmark". Sure memes about train crashes and chickens, move on its over etc, but not one single counter argument. That is called shear weight of opinion not in WOXI's favour. That beggers belief in the partesan world of sport. I beg to be corrected.

That draws me back to the 65k thread views here. Sure there are many looking for a sailing car crash and don't look beyond that. The interesting thing is most now regard the crash having happened, sailing and WOXI's reputation is the only victim and bled out on the roadway, there is more than one driver involved, but there hasn't been an investigation? They are still looking for unanswered questions beyond Microwave Hansel & Gretal stories. Some maybe wondering if they ever see a live camera on board again? Maybe outside broadcasters world wide think the same?

The upside of all that is education, to the extent the moron who posted that FaceFuck comment above and if now a viewer here, now arguably knows more about AIS on the race course than collectively the RC who after 12 hours could not find any evidence to prosecute a valid Protest beyond just Black Jack's squeal. I'm prepared to go one step further and say that because of this pissant thread not one RC world wide will want to see this catastrofuck attached to AIS attach itself to their own race.

If you want to draw a really long bow now. Does anyone honestly think Team WOXI will repeat again next year and third year in a row, this total failure in both PR crisis management and their adherence to the RRS as percieved by others for the next edition of the S2H? If they god forbid haven't learnt by now they won't have to worry about the delivery of WOXI home after the 75th. There is some probability some nutter will set fire to it in Hobart, maybe a disillusioned sport/cricket fan with a memory for sandpaper.

Sorry Paps about the long winded reply, but I disagree. This thread is not lacking by way of contribution.

PS. If anyone thinks this is a WOXI hater piece think again. I have been happy to stand beside Mark Richards since Day 1 and still do and tell anyone acussing Team WOXI of cheating to fuck off. Some of you wankers take note of that. That said my views of why WOXI got themselves into this predicament and issues about others involved is totally separate. Every post in that context I'm standing behind and not beside Mark, but with the people with the microphones or anyone else thinking enough is enough.

Fuck you pricks, you make me write.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, frant said:

Here a serious technical  question for Francis and Jack. The white coax cable with gold plated plug sitting on top of the AIS transponder is the other end of a digital VHF whip antennae mounted on the stern rail. Was previously used as the AIS antennae before the installation of an AIS splitter to masthead antennae. Should I leave the end where it is so that I can readily replace the connection to the AIS transponder in the event that the splitter is fried and becomes Rx only for AIS. Or should I pull the connector and cable back into the compartment above leaving it hanging next to the splitter so that I can swap out the masthead antennae in the event that the rig comes down and the masthead whip can’t get a signal out from under water? 

I am starting to think that it is more likely that a chopper will crash into and take my rig out rather than fry the splitter.

I was really hoping Francis would answer not me, my fingers and brain are worn out. However I mistakenly made a reference in all that typing upthread which leaves me having to do so.

4 hours ago, jack_sparrow said:

Sure there has been thread drift and comments on weird memes. Which reminds me I have yet to reply to @frant AIS technical cabling request.

If I have read correctly first you have a AIS/VHF sharing a masthead antenna via a Splitter. Doesn't get more normal than that where Offshore Regs come into play with VHF bring masthead mandatory and no two VHF antennas can be in close proximity without interference. 

Second you have a old pushpit mounted VHF antenna still wired but wired short of the new Splitter? You would like to include that antenna for redundancy in case the rig with masthead antenna decides to go horizontal.

If I have this slightly wrong it won't matter. From what I say here you can work it out in a jiffy. 

My view in two parts, one electronic best practise which arguably some might regard as OCD, the other with a Rules reference.

1. Electronic Best Practise.

All VHF/AIS systems utilise coaxial cable comprising foam dielectrics and moisture can quickly propagate along the foam dielectric resulting in signal loss. The cause of moisture intrusion into the cable is the centre pin construction of coaxial cable connectors. They are the principle source of most signal loss on sailboats. The culprits in order of probability start at the exposed masthead antenna connection, mast base connection (often wet despite below deck) facilitating mast removal and last the equipment/switch connections.

Frant with your ideas in mind of having a free floating cable connected to your spare VHF antenna ready to go for redundancy purposes. With the above in mind I suggest smearing the connector with some Dielectric Grease and then shrink tubing it.

2. Rules

With regard to your desire to have a redundancy VHF/AIS antenna. There are no sailing rules requiring this. Redundancy is currently based on lower powered VHF hand units only, not AIS.

For reference only. Post the loss of a person having a automatic enabled AIS PLB in the last VOR but the vessel having a AIS/VHF recieve issue that may or may not have been related to the above cable loss issues. A spare VHF/AIS enabled antenna was supplied by the VOR RO at the next race stopover.

Frant in terms of your redundancy plans say  as a consequence of the rig going horizontal you simply change over the antenna connection at the splitter using your spare pushpit antenna fly lead.

However you say that lead/connector is short of your Splitter. One option instead of splicing cable/cable connectors to reach the Splitter is to introduce a two way switch upstream of the Splitter to simply switch between both Antennas.

I hope this helps. If not it will alone keep this thread alive.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe be bigger question @toadis dumb cunts who can't read, but can't resist placing a couple of mono syllables in a place they want to go away? Mate there is probably some unpronouncable name for that infliction? I really hope it's curable for the poor buggers who have caught it.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to a well known veteran navigator who sailed this race.

He said on the first night quite a few AIS transmitters went off but the following day he saw them again. He is certain it was was deliberate.

It seems to me if you wanted an appearance of compliance whilst cheating you would turn AIS off for a gybe or tack and switch it back on a little later.

In defence of WOXI, I can't imagine a scenario where you simply turned it off before the start and then turned it back on as soon as you hit the dock in Hobart. It's far too obvious and too stupid to do.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Trickypig said:

I spoke to a well known veteran navigator who sailed this race.

He said on the first night quite a few AIS transmitters went off but the following day he saw them again. He is certain it was was deliberate.

It seems to me if you wanted an appearance of compliance whilst cheating you would turn AIS off for a gybe or tack and switch it back on a little later.

 

So get him to name and shame...

Then we can discuss each boat extensively and make this thread go on and on.

 

Or as I alluded to last year, BJ commented on WOIX's AIS without protesting because they believed it is a dumb ass rule that they do not want. The CYCA was forced into a corner and had to protest (to keep Random like idiots happy) quite possibly knowing it would be thrown out.

I would not be surprised if prior to the race that the owners/reps of the maxis and other top teams had been in discussions with the CYCA expressing their disagreement about the rule. This whole WOIX issue is a continuation of it. 

I would not be surprised if Richo was a loud voice in the CYCA regarding this rule and that it was a deliberate decision by him to turn it off. 

I believe that dumb rules and laws should and must be challenged, especially by people in a position who can influence a change.

 

A blanket mandatory AIS transmission rule will be dropped from the next race.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, jack_sparrow said:

If I have read correctly first you have a AIS/VHF sharing a masthead antenna via a Splitter. Doesn't get more normal than that where Offshore Regs come into play with VHF bring masthead mandatory and no two VHF antennas can be in close proximity without interference. 

Second you have a old pushpit mounted VHF antenna still wired but wired short of the new Splitter? You would like to include that antenna for redundancy in case the rig with masthead antenna decides to go horizontal.

I was looking in the large locker in my uncles recently purchased Jeanneau and noticed that there was a VHF antenna in the locker mounted and wired up. I have not seen his AIS RX install, but I had assumed that he had a splitter but now I am assuming that this antenna is for his AIS.

Slowly discovering all the stupid things done by the PO, like the house battery not being wired up to be charged from the engine (just shore & solar)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, hoppy said:

So get him to name and shame...

Then we can discuss each boat extensively and make this thread go on and on.

 

Or as I alluded to last year, BJ commented on WOIX's AIS without protesting because they believed it is a dumb ass rule that they do not want. The CYCA was forced into a corner and had to protest (to keep Random like idiots happy) quite possibly knowing it would be thrown out.

I would not be surprised if prior to the race that the owners/reps of the maxis and other top teams had been in discussions with the CYCA expressing their disagreement about the rule. This whole WOIX issue is a continuation of it. 

I would not be surprised if Richo was a loud voice in the CYCA regarding this rule and that it was a deliberate decision by him to turn it off. 

I believe that dumb rules and laws should and must be challenged, especially by people in a position who can influence a change.

 

A blanket mandatory AIS transmission rule will be dropped from the next race.

Hoppy you just accused MR of deliberately cheating yes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, paps49 said:

Hoppy you just accused MR of deliberately cheating yes?

no, protesting against stupidity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Trickypig said:

I spoke to a well known veteran navigator who sailed this race.

He said on the first night quite a few AIS transmitters went off but the following day he saw them again.

Come on Tricky! everyone knows AIS is VHF therefore line of sight.

You can't see far in the dark. Just the same for AIS. It can be see a long way in the daytime but not so good at night!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, hoppy said:

no, protesting against stupidity

Siri : whats the definition of cheating in a boat race?

 

"I would not be surprised if Richo was a loud voice in the CYCA regarding this rule and that it was a deliberate decision by him to turn it off". 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Protest by cheating, an interesting concept. Maybe MR should have run with this explanation from the get go.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, staysail said:

Come on Tricky! everyone knows AIS is VHF therefore line of sight.

You can't see far in the dark. Just the same for AIS. It can be see a long way in the daytime but not so good at night!

He was talking about immediate competition who are still close by on the first night

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Trickypig said:

He was talking about immediate competition who are still close by on the first night

You missed the pink font.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, paps49 said:

You missed the pink font.

did you mean pink fong?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, jack_sparrow said:

With the above in mind I suggest smearing the connector with some Dielectric Grease and then shrink tubing it.

Yeah. The problems with corrosion in connectors and moisture wicking up dielectrics cannot be overstated. Seawater makes it all the more horrendous. There are some really evil corrosion modes in plated copper wire, and you can end up with nothing but red dust. As Jack says, protecting the loose end is good practice, but also keep an eye on the connections at the antenna end. They deserve similar protection and inspection. You want to be sure there isn't access for moisture up the coax as well as protecting the conductors and connecting parts. The problem of discovering that the backup system has long since failed right as you need it is a story told far too often. Inspecting and checking that the reserve antenna works properly needs to be part of schedule. If you don't you might as well remove it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Trickypig said:

He was talking about immediate competition who are still close by on the first night

oops too hot here, building a deck and not concentrating on iPhone/forums.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, hoppy said:

A blanket mandatory AIS transmission rule will be dropped from the next race.

I doubt it. The OA is seriously risk averse. They are not going to backtrack on something they have added as a safety measure. It looks bad, and if there is an incident, they will have nowhere to turn. They would be pilloried. And memories are long of the last time. 

I would expect a stern reminder to boats about the rule, some token checking, and a DSQ if a boat really does have its AIS not transmit when checked. There is no need, and they won't be, checking every boat all of the time, but the spectre of a DSQ in the face of the WOXI debacle this time around will scare most skippers off playing fast and loose with the invisibility button.

Given the money each boat spends, mandating SOTDMA Class-B would not be unreasonable. It would cost less than the bar bill on arrival. Pretty soon you won't be able to buy CSTDMA Class-B anyway. The marginal cost in manufacture is probably only a few dollars. Going to a 5 Watt transmitter would make end to end tracking of boats via AIS much easier, and compliance checking much easier. I doubt they will go this far, but as I say, it would not be unreasonable.

IMHO the OA needs to add two things to the SIs.

  • An addition to the AIS mandatory transmit clause that clearly states that a penalty will be mandatory if the AIS transmitter is turned off, up to and including DSQ. - That will scare the chickens enough.
  • An addition to the Media SIs to the effect that any mention of rule infringement by another boat to any member of the accredited media must be followed up by a valid protest. Failure will result in an automatic penalty up to and including DSQ. (Moaning to the media after the protest time window has passed therefore means an automatic penalty.) 

What the OA can't easily fix is the culture that seems present of kow-towing to the yachting gods. The smell that comes from this mess is largely about that. The OA is left with a taint  that they will bend the rules and procedures so that the golden boys of the race are treated a little more favorably than the rest. Bouncing the chair of the IJ that pinged WOXI last year stinks badly. One can just imagine some mid-level club apparatchik thinking that they can't let WOXI get pinged again, quietly removing the IJ chair from this year's IJ,  and being terrified when the AIS mess happened. I don't do conspiracies, but I do do fools out of their depth making really bad decisions, usually more than once. That is where it comes down to culture.

 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, hoppy said:

Or as I alluded to last year, BJ commented on WOIX's AIS without protesting because they believed it is a dumb ass rule that they do not want. The CYCA was forced into a corner and had to protest (to keep Random like idiots happy) quite possibly knowing it would be thrown out.

I would not be surprised if prior to the race that the owners/reps of the maxis and other top teams had been in discussions with the CYCA expressing their disagreement about the rule. This whole WOIX issue is a continuation of it. 

I would not be surprised if Richo was a loud voice in the CYCA regarding this rule and that it was a deliberate decision by him to turn it off. 

Have you told the Government about those Aliens that contacted you?

img (1).jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Francis Vaughan said:

Given the money each boat spends, mandating SOTDMA Class-B would not be unreasonable. It would cost less than the bar bill on arrival. Pretty soon you won't be able to buy CSTDMA Class-B anyway.

Francis that won't be happening despite what some say. SOTDMA is not a technological advancement meant to make CSTDMA redundant. It is simply a alternative platform to bridge the gap with Class A with a bit more power and using the same slot reservation approach

The reason CSTDMA for recreational users is restricted to 2 watts and is less responsive is to give Class A transceivers slot priority.

Clutter is a real problem for Commercial users in busy areas. There are already clutter issues with AIS Satelitte recievers/relays that due to their very wide coverage can't process the signals they recieve and get overloaded. More greater powered trancievers will make that worse.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, jack_sparrow said:

Clutter is a real problem for Commercial users in busy areas.

True. Point taken.  OTOH, I'm not sure what the answer to clutter really is. The number of slots available in the current protocol is not great. I have thought for a while that there will need to be a revision to the AIS protocols to take into account clutter in some of the really bad areas. The posting a while back about fishermen putting cheap transceivers in their nets really brought home the problem. But things get out of hand in these crowded areas anyway. Hundreds of AIS tracks appearing on your display whichever way you turn makes things really difficult. Unregulated access to AIS transceivers just makes things worse. 

I can see a new tier of AIS becoming needed in a while. Moving to spread spectrum protocols might help in a number of ways. But it is very hard to move the entire world.

'The reason CSTDMA for recreational users is restricted to 2 watts and is less responsive is to give Class A transceivers slot priority."

It gets complicated. CDTDMA isn't as slot friendly as SOTDAM. CD just listens and tries to avoid, relying on its lower power to avoid hitting a class-A transmitting in the slot further away. A Class-B with SOTDMA will actively avoid a reserved slot. And since it swill transmit less often than class-A, you still SOTDMA class-B to make up for the slot utilisation of one class A moving at speed. But you can't fully compare the two, there is a bit of apples versus pears here. So, indeed, CSTDMA may still be more friendly in many uses. 

The problem with the satellites is much harder. There are already a lot of serious smarts involved in de-tangling the overlapping transmissions a sat sees. Clearly there comes a point where no more smarts can help. The answer probably comes from more and lower sats. That doesn't come cheap, but might be a big earner for someone if they get it right.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why can’t/weren’t the AIS regs upgraded along the lines of the VHF and sat phone ones, including checks, penalties and specific declarations? Eg SI’s 37.7, 37.8, 39 and the declaration form?

Did they not learn from all the electronicgate issues in the past? And here we are again.....

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, hoppy said:

Slowly discovering all the stupid things done by the PO, like the house battery not being wired up to be charged from the engine (just shore & solar)

Hoppy you sure engine alternator and starter motor not simply share the same start battery circuit and or alternator diodes not fried by someone disconnecting battery with engine running?

If alternator is on seperate circuit and house and start batts not linked is a odd decision by someone. Interestingly people will call in an electrician for high voltage work thinking it will kill them if wrongly executed but for low voltage DIY. The reality is low voltage done incorrectly probably has a greater chance of if not killing them, burning their boat to the waterline.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Francis Vaughan said:

The posting a while back about fishermen putting cheap transceivers in their nets really brought home the problem. But things get out of hand in these crowded areas anyway. Hundreds of AIS tracks appearing on your display whichever way you turn makes things really difficult. Unregulated access to AIS transceivers just makes things worse. 

My post about that use by fisherman of vessel units was mainly directed to Asia where some countries are like the AIS wild west. Not all though. For instance Singapore registered non SOLAS and recreational vessels Class AIS B has been mandatory for a few years now. They even went one step further and paid for the cost of installation for those registered before that adoption date. With their punitive justice system non compliance probably means you get a 100 lashes of the cane there.

China is the worst offender where you can come across a mile long line of fishing devices all individually coming up as vessels. It looks like you have China's Pacific First Fleet lining you up to take you out.

I'm not aware of this problem in Australia. I think the fishing and aquaculture industry get non vessel AIS transponders properly papered up. With their more prevalent use now the CYC is on the record as saying this is one thing behind their AIS decision making. I suspect things like the Vestas incident and subsequent investigation headed up coincidentally by an ex S2H RC member, could also have guided their decision making.

It is probably not unreasonable to expect that Australia might go the way of Singapore making AIS mandatory, though more difficult with a state by state registration system for all but Australian registered vessels. Not only for collision avoidance but also environmental issues like monitoring fishing exclusion zones etc.

There is also probably a good counter argument that recreational vessels should never have been given access to AIS with an associated lapse in watch keeping culture, that prior to that the fear of being run down by a large vessel was a good motivator.

Maybe the RC should follow Singapores lead with the penalty for not activating your AIS is a canning in Hobarts Town Square? 

caning.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Trickypig said:

I spoke to a well known veteran navigator who sailed this race.

He said on the first night quite a few AIS transmitters went off but the following day he saw them again. He is certain it was was deliberate.

It seems to me if you wanted an appearance of compliance whilst cheating you would turn AIS off for a gybe or tack and switch it back on a little later.

In defence of WOXI, I can't imagine a scenario where you simply turned it off before the start and then turned it back on as soon as you hit the dock in Hobart. It's far too obvious and too stupid to do.

 

Tricky there could be a lot of other explanations for that bearing in mind on some race boats power storage and generation can be pretty flakey. For instance at night the ingrained practise of turning off all but key essentials (when power consumption is at its highest) by someone not aware of the rule change? Similarly ingrained tactical use of AIS at night etc?

Yeah the deliberate turn off at start and turn on at end (prepping for delivery home the next day) by WOXI idea hasn't got a lot of legs. The crazy thing if Richo replied with the "fried splitter" story on the dock Friday morning, this thread would barely exist, other than for a few microwave memes. There may not have even been a RC Protest.

However coming out with it 3 days after the event in the contrived way it was, was as good as pouring petrol over yourself and asking for a match.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some very interesting comments today. Got me thinking.

Why is the CYC not at least defending AIS as a valuable safety tool?

Nothing, shtoom, not a thing to say on the matter or their reasons for including it in the SI's in the first place.

Curious leadership of the situation.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't they hang the Armless guy out to dry for the big one.

And dismissed or forgot to invite back the guy who soiled big Oats last year.

Maybe Tassie should step in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Francis Vaughan said:

I doubt it. The OA is seriously risk averse. They are not going to backtrack on something they have added as a safety measure. It looks bad, and if there is an incident, they will have nowhere to turn. They would be pilloried. And memories are long of the last time. 

Please share how an AIS transmitting your position during daylight in good visibility in waters that are pretty quiet with the exception of the S2H racers is a safety benefit?

AIS transmission did not help Vestas or the fishing boat they sunk. 

It's time to draw a line with nanny state stupidity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, paps49 said:

Why is the CYC not at least defending AIS as a valuable safety tool?

because in the context of the S2H AIS is not such a valuable safety tool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, hoppy said:

Please share how an AIS transmitting your position during daylight in good visibility in waters that are pretty quiet with the exception of the S2H racers is a safety benefit?

AIS transmission did not help Vestas or the fishing boat they sunk. 

It's time to draw a line with nanny state stupidity.

Hoppy, you are on fire. Go you good thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, jack_sparrow said:

Hoppy you sure engine alternator and starter motor not simply share the same start battery circuit and or alternator diodes not fried by someone disconnecting battery with engine running?

If alternator is on seperate circuit and house and start batts not linked is a odd decision by someone. Interestingly people will call in an electrician for high voltage work thinking it will kill them if wrongly executed but for low voltage DIY. The reality is low voltage done incorrectly probably has a greater chance of if not killing them, burning their boat to the waterline.

The batteries have separate cut off switch and I checked the charging with a clip on amp meter. I have not spent much time looking at it. On my old Jeanneau the wiring was easy to understand as the battery isolator was in an obvious location whilst on my Uncles Jeanneau, it was not visible in the engine bay. 

Now that I think about it, there were two house batteries and they way they are wired up also looks wrong. It's set up with the + & - cables to the switches/consumers both coming off the same battery. That setup usually means the first battery supplies more amps and charges first or something like that.

He has a marine sparky who will fix it all up.

    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, hoppy said:

The batteries have separate cut off switch and I checked the charging with a clip on amp meter. I have not spent much time looking at it. On my old Jeanneau the wiring was easy to understand as the battery isolator was in an obvious location whilst on my Uncles Jeanneau, it was not visible in the engine bay. 

Now that I think about it, there were two house batteries and they way they are wired up also looks wrong. It's set up with the + & - cables to the switches/consumers both coming off the same battery. That setup usually means the first battery supplies more amps and charges first or something like that.

He has a marine sparky who will fix it all up.

    

That's great Hoppy, over to fix it anarchy for the follow ups.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, paps49 said:

Hoppy, you are on fire. Go you good thing.

I would love to know how AIS helps?

I know that when I was sol