Sign in to follow this  
badlatitude

Laugh of the Day: Trump Should Be Able to Correct Mueller Report before release

Recommended Posts

Isn't this like NM2 being able to correct his police report every time the neighbors call?

Source: The Hill



BY NIALL STANAGE - 01/11/19 08:55 AM EST 

Rudy Giuliani says President Trump’s legal team should be allowed to “correct” special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report before Congress or the American people get the chance to read it. 

The claim, made in a telephone interview with The Hill on Thursday evening, goes further than the president’s legal advisers have ever gone before in arguing they have a right to review the conclusions of Mueller’s probe, which is now in its 20th month. 

“As a matter of fairness, they should show it to you — so we can correct it if they’re wrong,” said the former New York City mayor, who is a member of Trump's personal legal team. “They’re not God, after all. They could be wrong.” 

In the wide-ranging interview, Giuliani also made light of the decision by Michael Cohen — Trump’s former attorney, who was recently sentenced to three years in prison — to testify in public before the House Oversight and Reform Committee on Feb. 7.

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/424871-exclusive-trump-team-should-be-allowed-to-correct-final-mueller

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well, mueller's a republican - and repub's have been proven by independent research to be dumber than rocks.  so maybe rudy's talking about spellchecking

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, hermetic said:

well, mueller's a republican - and repub's have been proven by independent research to be dumber than rocks.  so maybe rudy's talking about spellchecking

Oh, come on now.....not all republicans are dumb shits, just most dumb shits are republican.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to a commenter at The Hill, Rudy Giuliani's finished correction would look something like this:

Avatar
SpartanWarrior✓ˢᵖᵃʳᵗᵃⁿʷᵃʳʳᶦᵒʳ  an hour ago

Donald Trump laundered money for used his kung-fu skills to defeat a violent gang of Russian criminals and falsified his taxes to hide the profits saved the world by deactivating their singularity laser bomb seconds before it was going to detonate.

  • 118  
  • Reply
  • Share 
    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    I think it would be wise to keep several copies back, so that after the Trump team blacks out everything of relevance, the unredacted report can be delivered to the congress, and the press, along with the altered one, so that everyone can see what Trump wanted to block.

    • Like 4

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    9 minutes ago, Mrleft8 said:

    I think it would be wise to keep several copies back, so that after the Trump team blacks out everything of relevance, the unredacted report can be delivered to the congress, and the press, along with the altered one, so that everyone can see what Trump wanted to block.

    I think it would be a better use of time if the Trump Team saved their efforts for the trial. That's where the public opinion will be sharpest.

    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    The redacted report would be reduced to "no collusion!!!!" "witch hunt" "Bye Bye" 

    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Muller Report

    No Trump collushun. 

    Crooked Hillery colushun.

    President Trump is the best president ever.  He is very strong and always tells the truth.  Many people are saying it.  Belief me.  He never said that Mexico would pay for the wall. 

    Hillery used email.  

    The End. 

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    5 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

    Muller Report

    No Trump collushun. 

    Crooked Hillery colushun.

    President Trump is the best president ever.  He is very strong and always tells the truth.  Many people are saying it.  Belief me.  He never said that Mexico would pay for the wall. 

    Hillery used email.  

    The End. 

    • Benghazi!!!

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    8 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

    Muller Report

    No Trump collushun. 

    Crooked Hillery colushun.

    President Trump is the best president ever.  He is very strong and always tells the truth.  Many people are saying it.  Belief me.  He never said that Mexico would pay for the wall. 

    Hillery used email.  

    The End. 

    What color crayon or will they pull out all the stops and use multiple colors?

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    3 hours ago, badlatitude said:

    Isn't this like NM2 being able to correct his police report every time the neighbors call?

    Source: The Hill



    BY NIALL STANAGE - 01/11/19 08:55 AM EST 

    Rudy Giuliani says President Trump’s legal team should be allowed to “correct” special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report before Congress or the American people get the chance to read it. 

    The claim, made in a telephone interview with The Hill on Thursday evening, goes further than the president’s legal advisers have ever gone before in arguing they have a right to review the conclusions of Mueller’s probe, which is now in its 20th month. 

    “As a matter of fairness, they should show it to you — so we can correct it if they’re wrong,” said the former New York City mayor, who is a member of Trump's personal legal team. “They’re not God, after all. They could be wrong.” 

    In the wide-ranging interview, Giuliani also made light of the decision by Michael Cohen — Trump’s former attorney, who was recently sentenced to three years in prison — to testify in public before the House Oversight and Reform Committee on Feb. 7.

    Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/424871-exclusive-trump-team-should-be-allowed-to-correct-final-mueller

    What the fuck is wrong with these fools?  Are they actually that fucking stupid? Are they actually that fucking crooked and traitorous? This is crazy-talk. 

    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    14 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

    Muller Report

    No Trump collushun. 

    Crooked Hillery colushun.

    President Trump is the best president ever.  He is very strong and always tells the truth.  Many people are saying it.  Belief me.  He never said that Mexico would pay for the wall. 

    Hillery used email.  

    The End. 

    ps: guns.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, bridhb said:

    Oh, come on now.....not all republicans are dumb shits, just most dumb shits are republican.

    Old news. VERY old.

    image.png.35f2b61e68c23f9be9ce36ee9d39a759.png

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    19 minutes ago, Clove Hitch said:

    What the fuck is wrong with these fools?  Are they actually that fucking stupid? Are they actually that fucking crooked and traitorous?

    Yep.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    23 minutes ago, Clove Hitch said:

    What the fuck is wrong with these fools?  Are they actually that fucking stupid? Are they actually that fucking crooked and traitorous? This is crazy-talk. 

    They are VERY smart.   Smart enough to know that their target audience isnt.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    What is more concerning is Donnie’s base will consider this request perfectly reasonable because it’s a witch hunt.

    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    6 hours ago, badlatitude said:

    Isn't this like NM2 being able to correct his police report every time the neighbors call?

    Source: The Hill



    BY NIALL STANAGE - 01/11/19 08:55 AM EST 

    Rudy Giuliani says President Trump’s legal team should be allowed to “correct” special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report before Congress or the American people get the chance to read it. 

    The claim, made in a telephone interview with The Hill on Thursday evening, goes further than the president’s legal advisers have ever gone before in arguing they have a right to review the conclusions of Mueller’s probe, which is now in its 20th month. 

    “As a matter of fairness, they should show it to you — so we can correct it if they’re wrong,” said the former New York City mayor, who is a member of Trump's personal legal team. “They’re not God, after all. They could be wrong.” 

    In the wide-ranging interview, Giuliani also made light of the decision by Michael Cohen — Trump’s former attorney, who was recently sentenced to three years in prison — to testify in public before the House Oversight and Reform Committee on Feb. 7.

    Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/424871-exclusive-trump-team-should-be-allowed-to-correct-final-mueller

    Mueller's report is hardly dispositive, it is a prosecutors case representing only one side. We have a tradition in this country of hearing from both sides and it is entirely appropriate and fair that Trump's legal team have an opportunity to offer a rebuttal.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    I don't remember reading anything in muellers authorization about the white house getting the report prior to congress.

    mueller to rosenstein/doj (report), rosenstein/doj to congress (summary)

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    8 minutes ago, Dog said:

    Mueller's report is hardly dispositive, it is a prosecutors case representing only one side. We have a tradition in this country of hearing from both sides and it is entirely appropriate and fair that Trump's legal team have an opportunity to offer a rebuttal.

    But... they have you to do that for them

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    11 minutes ago, Dog said:

    Mueller's report is hardly dispositive, it is a prosecutors case representing only one side. We have a tradition in this country of hearing from both sides and it is entirely appropriate and fair that Trump's legal team have an opportunity to offer a rebuttal.

    A rebuttal is one thing, “correcting it” before it goes to Congress is something altogether different. 

    • Like 6

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    15 minutes ago, Dog said:

    Mueller's report is hardly dispositive, it is a prosecutors case representing only one side. We have a tradition in this country of hearing from both sides and it is entirely appropriate and fair that Trump's legal team have an opportunity to offer a rebuttal.

    Yep.

    "A rebuttal" or perhaps more appropriately, a defense, is quite different from getting the report funneled thru them only, and editing it to suit themselves or squashing it entirely..... that would most accurately be called "obstruction of justice"

    [edit to add]

    2 minutes ago, Sean said:

    A rebuttal is one thing, “correcting it” before it goes to Congress is something altogether different. 

    Beat me to it by mere seconds!!

    -DSK

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    56 minutes ago, Dog said:

    Mueller's report is hardly dispositive, it is a prosecutors case representing only one side. We have a tradition in this country of hearing from both sides and it is entirely appropriate and fair that Trump's legal team have an opportunity to offer a rebuttal.

    Yea, it’s called a trial.

    • Like 5

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Would even suggesting the Trump team should review and “correct” a prosecutors report constitute Obstruction?

    Most certainly a clear conflict of interest.

    Mueller and his team have been paying close attention to the timeline of events and Donnie’s very public utterances on the subjects, it sounds like Obstruction will be just one facet of a multi pronged range of charges Team T could be looking at.

    In the bigger scheme of things Trump and the wall is diversionary to this issue and Donnie will be doing all he can to undermine the Dems before this Mueller report is presented and quickly buried by his new AG, if Donnie gets his way the report will never see the light of day.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    It sounds as if Trump's team are expecting the report to be "refreshing"

    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    18 minutes ago, Shortforbob said:

    It sounds as if Trump's team are expecting the report to be "refreshing"

    Good lemming.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    4 hours ago, Cal20sailor said:

    What color crayon or will they pull out all the stops and use multiple colors?

    Sharpies

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    33 minutes ago, Navig8tor said:

    Would even suggesting the Trump team should review and “correct” a prosecutors report constitute Obstruction?

    Most certainly a clear conflict of interest.

    Mueller and his team have been paying close attention to the timeline of events and Donnie’s very public utterances on the subjects, it sounds like Obstruction will be just one facet of a multi pronged range of charges Team T could be looking at.

    In the bigger scheme of things Trump and the wall is diversionary to this issue and Donnie will be doing all he can to undermine the Dems before this Mueller report is presented and quickly buried by his new AG, if Donnie gets his way the report will never see the light of day.

    Sounds like Rosenstein is timing his departure to protect the release of the report from meddling by the new boy.

    Doggie:  What's that thing sticking out from your backside?  Is it a tail?  Doesn't it need chasing?  

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    I hope everyone who thinks Trump’s team should not have an opportunity to see, prepare a rebuttal to, and submit it at the same time as Mueller’s report is hauled Into a court of law on a felony charge and is not allowed to present a defense to the judge.

    • Downvote 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    57 minutes ago, badlatitude said:

    Yea, it’s called a trial.

    That would require more than a report.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    14 minutes ago, J28 said:

    I hope everyone who thinks Trump’s team should not have an opportunity to see, prepare a rebuttal to, and submit it at the same time as Mueller’s report is hauled Into a court of law on a felony charge and is not allowed to present a defense to the judge.

    Did you have a bowl of stupid for breakfast?

    The report gets issued, they will then have the opportunity to turd polish it to their hearts content.

    If someone gets prosecuted on the basis of the report, their lawyers will have the opportunity to rebut in mounting a defence of the charges levelled.

    No way should the subject of any inquiry have the opportunity to correct or alter any report.

    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    6 minutes ago, Navig8tor said:

    Did you have a bowl of stupid for breakfast?

    Rhetorical question?

    It's the way he starts every day - "The Breakfast of Morons"

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, Dog said:

    Mueller's report is hardly dispositive, it is a prosecutors case representing only one side. We have a tradition in this country of hearing from both sides and it is entirely appropriate and fair that Trump's legal team have an opportunity to offer a rebuttal.

    That is what a TRIAL is for........and redacting the prosecutor’s case is called OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    2 minutes ago, Sidecar said:
    2 hours ago, Dog said:

    Mueller's report is hardly dispositive, it is a prosecutors case representing only one side. We have a tradition in this country of hearing from both sides and it is entirely appropriate and fair that Trump's legal team have an opportunity to offer a rebuttal.

    That is what a TRIAL is for........

    And Fox and Friends.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Are the trolls on this site so stupid they really don't understand the legal process?  Or are they just click-hunters, looking for their pittance per post?  Or did they get their "legal training" in Moscow.

    Whatever, it is not worth responding to them.  

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    50 minutes ago, Navig8tor said:

    Did you have a bowl of stupid for breakfast?

    The report gets issued, they will then have the opportunity to turd polish it to their hearts content.

    If someone gets prosecuted on the basis of the report, their lawyers will have the opportunity to rebut in mounting a defence of the charges levelled.

    No way should the subject of any inquiry have the opportunity to correct or alter any report.

    You are stoopid on a stick.  I said “see, prepare a rebuttal and submit it concurrently with the Mueller report”.

    RIF asshole

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, Shortforbob said:

    It sounds as if Trump's team are expecting the report to be "refreshing"

    Horrific. He expects it to be horrific. That is to say that he expects it to point out that Hillary used email in Benghazi. 

    https://www.mediaite.com/online/giuliani-slams-wrong-news-outlet-for-report-he-expects-mueller-report-to-be-horrific/

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    12 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

    Horrific. He expects it to be horrific. That is to say that he expects it to point out that Hillary used email in Benghazi. 

    https://www.mediaite.com/online/giuliani-slams-wrong-news-outlet-for-report-he-expects-mueller-report-to-be-horrific/

    And pizzas and basements as well.

     

     

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    18 minutes ago, J28 said:

    You are stoopid on a stick.  I said “see, prepare a rebuttal and submit it concurrently with the Mueller report”.

    RIF asshole

    But wait,  you actually said:

    1 hour ago, J28 said:

    I hope everyone who thinks Trump’s team should not have an opportunity to see, prepare a rebuttal to, and submit it at the same time as Mueller’s report is hauled Into a court of law on a felony charge and is not allowed to present a defense to the judge.

    Missed English 101, Periods and commas can be your friend.

    Didn't we,  you retarded FUCKWIT.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    3 hours ago, Dog said:

    Mueller's report is hardly dispositive, it is a prosecutors case representing only one side. We have a tradition in this country of hearing from both sides and it is entirely appropriate and fair that Trump's legal team have an opportunity to offer a rebuttal.

    Should the FBI have submitted their report regarding the investigation, er "matter", to Hillary, so she could "correct" it before anyone else saw it?

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, Navig8tor said:
    3 hours ago, J28 said:

    I hope everyone who thinks Trump’s team should not have an opportunity to see, prepare a rebuttal to, and submit it at the same time as Mueller’s report is hauled Into a court of law on a felony charge and is not allowed to present a defense to the judge.

    Missed English 101, Periods and commas can be your friend.

    Didn't we,  you retarded FUCKWIT.

    Yeah but he got an "A+" in Ebonics

    -DSK

    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    4 hours ago, Dog said:

    Mueller's report is hardly dispositive, it is a prosecutors case representing only one side. We have a tradition in this country of hearing from both sides and it is entirely appropriate and fair that Trump's legal team have an opportunity to offer a rebuttal.

    Actually, the "other side" has been asked repeatedly to comment, and offer evidence.

    Have they?

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    3 hours ago, Left Shift said:

    Sounds like Rosenstein is timing his departure to protect the release of the report from meddling by the new boy.

    Doggie:  What's that thing sticking out from your backside?  Is it a tail?  Doesn't it need chasing?  

    No. That's not a tail. That's Donald Trump's dildo. It has a weird toadstool like head that makes it difficult to POP out.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    6 hours ago, Dog said:

    Mueller's report is hardly dispositive, it is a prosecutors case representing only one side. We have a tradition in this country of hearing from both sides and it is entirely appropriate and fair that Trump's legal team have an opportunity to offer a rebuttal.

    One side "correcting" the other side's report before it is released is not hearing from both sides.  It's hearing from one side. 

    I'm stunned that you would interpret it otherwise. 

    • Like 2

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    1 minute ago, benwynn said:

    One side "correcting" the other side's report before it is released is not hearing from both sides.  It's hearing from one side. 

    I'm stunned that you would interpret it otherwise. 

    I'm not. Haven't you been paying attention to what Dog has been posting, of late?

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, Steam Flyer said:

    Yeah but he got an "A+" in Ebonics

    -DSK

    And fuckwittery - don't forget the fuckwittery.

    It's his best subject.

    • Like 2

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    23 minutes ago, benwynn said:

    I'm stunned that you would interpret it otherwise. 

    You neglected the purple font.

    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    3 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

    Should the FBI have submitted their report regarding the investigation, er "matter", to Hillary, so she could "correct" it before anyone else saw it?

    By not putting her and her aides under oath they essentially allowed her and her aides to correct any report before it was issued.  

    • Downvote 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    6 minutes ago, Olsonist said:

    Joke-off, the FBI doesn't have to put you under oath for you to be charged with lying to the FBI.

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001

    https://www.wisenberglaw.com/Articles/How-to-Avoid-Going-to-Jail-under-18-U-S-C-Section-1001-for-Lying-to-Government-Agents.shtml

    You're not very good at this.

    That only works when you are part of Trump’s team.  When you work for Hillary lying to the FBI is no big deal 

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/breaking-report-top-hillary-aide-huma-abedin-gave-false-statements-to-fbi-agents-in-2017-interview/

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    23 minutes ago, The Joker said:

    That only works when you are part of Trump’s team.  When you work for Hillary lying to the FBI is no big deal 

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/breaking-report-top-hillary-aide-huma-abedin-gave-false-statements-to-fbi-agents-in-2017-interview/

    Where in Siberia do you reside? you are obviously not a real amerikan. Fok opf Komradd.

    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, The Joker said:

    That only works when you are part of Trump’s team.  When you work for Hillary lying to the FBI is no big deal 

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/breaking-report-top-hillary-aide-huma-abedin-gave-false-statements-to-fbi-agents-in-2017-interview/

    I sense some victimhood of an unfair world. Can we get a hankie over here, please?

    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, Olsonist said:

    Joke-off, the FBI doesn't have to put you under oath for you to be charged with lying to the FBI.

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001

    https://www.wisenberglaw.com/Articles/How-to-Avoid-Going-to-Jail-under-18-U-S-C-Section-1001-for-Lying-to-Government-Agents.shtml

    You're not very good at this.

    Wait a minute... You mean when investigators ask you questions it's not procedure that they pull out a Bible first and ask you to raise your right hand?  Last time I got pulled over by a cop I thought it was my lucky day in that he had just forgot.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    15 minutes ago, benwynn said:

    Wait a minute... You mean when investigators ask you questions it's not procedure that they pull out a Bible first and ask you to raise your right hand?  Last time I got pulled over by a cop I thought it was my lucky day in that he had just forgot.

    Pro tip: when talking to a Federal officer, you can also cross your fingers behind your back and say anything:

    image.png.3314735efbe21c0230ec80efb6a2b6b4.png

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    5 hours ago, Mrleft8 said:

    No. That's not a tail. That's Donald Trump's dildo. It has a weird toadstool like head that makes it difficult to POP out.

    For use with hinged and unhinged assholes...

    getting-to-know-national.jpg.f1cd459225a80cd60af5844f43f3d8d0.jpg

     

    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    21 hours ago, badlatitude said:

    Rudy Giuliani says President Trump’s legal team should be allowed to “correct” special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report before Congress or the American people get the chance to read it. 

    He should probably be careful what he asks for.

    Like previous administrations, they'd probably want to edit it to look like this:

    issa-redactedw.jpg

    But I'd expect the original can't be suppressed for long and it would make things worse when that appears.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    9 hours ago, benwynn said:

    One side "correcting" the other side's report before it is released is not hearing from both sides.  It's hearing from one side. 

    I'm stunned that you would interpret it otherwise. 

    If you think Mueller is going to let Trumps attorneys edit his report I have a bridge for you. Any "corrections" will be in the form of a rebuttal.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    6 hours ago, Olsonist said:

    Pro tip: when talking to a Federal officer, you can also cross your fingers behind your back and say anything:

    image.png.3314735efbe21c0230ec80efb6a2b6b4.png

    The Doggy Style. 

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    30 minutes ago, Dog said:

    If you think Mueller is going to let Trumps attorneys edit his report I have a bridge for you. Any "corrections" will be in the form of a rebuttal.

    Tell that to Rudy.

     

    The Hill - https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/424871-exclusive-trump-team-should-be-allowed-to-correct-final-mueller

    “As a matter of fairness, they should show it to you — so we can correct it if they’re wrong,” said the former New York City mayor, who is a member of Trump's personal legal team. “They’re not God, after all. They could be wrong.”

    “Of course we have to see [the report] before it goes to Congress. We have reserved executive privilege and we have a right to assert it. The only way we can assert it is if we see what is in the report.”

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    10 hours ago, badlatitude said:
    14 hours ago, Dog said:

    That would require more than a report.

    Nope, it’s called an impeachment.

    exactly

    I would expect that mueller and his team (or a local federal prosecutor) will prosecute any crime they find prior to submitting the report

    the report will lay out any crimes committed by the president.  then it's up to congress

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    13 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

    Should the FBI have submitted their report regarding the investigation, er "matter", to Hillary, so she could "correct" it before anyone else saw it?

    They probably did.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    18 minutes ago, Dog said:

    They probably did.

    Bullshit.  

    Seriously.  Do you really think that is how it should work?

    Should Bill Clinton have been given the Starr Report to "correct" before it was presented to Congress?

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    8 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

    Bullshit.  

    Seriously.  Do you really think that is how it should work?

    Should Bill Clinton have been given the Starr Report to "correct" before it was presented to Congress?

    Not just correct but assert executive privilege over parts that involve the president. 

    @Dogare you nodding in agreement with Rudy?

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    3 hours ago, Dog said:

    If you think Mueller is going to let Trumps attorneys edit his report I have a bridge for you. Any "corrections" will be in the form of a rebuttal.

    So when the first post specifically stated that Gulliani wanted the chance to "correct" the report before Congress and the people saw it,  and we called bullshit, your response to us was that they should be allowed to make a rebuttal.

    Nobody even discussed a rebuttal much less expressed any objection to one.

    If you think I don't know you just walked this one back, I've to bridge to sell you.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, benwynn said:

    So when the first post specifically stated that Gulliani wanted the chance to "correct" the report before Congress and the people saw it,  and we called bullshit, your response to us was that they should be allowed to make a rebuttal.

    Nobody even discussed a rebuttal much less expressed any objection to one.

    If you think I don't know you just walked this one back, I've to bridge to sell you.

    Please...It's not Trump's report, it's Mueller's report. The idea that Trump's lawyers should be allowed to edit Mueller's report is so preposterous that there has to be some doggystyling in the telling .

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    3 minutes ago, Dog said:

    Please...It's not Trump's report, it's Mueller's report. The idea that Trump's lawyers should be allowed to edit Mueller's report is so preposterous that there has to be some doggystyling in the telling .

    Yes, exactly this. For once, we agree on something - what Rudi said was completely preposterous.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    7 minutes ago, Dog said:

    Please...It's not Trump's report, it's Mueller's report. The idea that Trump's lawyers should be allowed to edit Mueller's report is so preposterous that there has to be some doggystyling in the telling .

    Is that why you said it?

    -DSK

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Don't you just love it when Dog uses the term Doggystyling?

    Deep self awareness.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    2 minutes ago, SloopJonB said:

    Don't you just love it when Dog uses the term Doggystyling?

    Deep self awareness.

    Hi bitch

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    9 minutes ago, Nice! said:

    Yes, exactly this. For once, we agree on something - what Rudi said was completely preposterous.

    What Rudy is reported to have said is preposterious.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    1 minute ago, Dog said:

    What Rudy is reported to have said is preposterious.

    Why are you suddenly trying to doggystyle this? The quote is in black and white, and reported by the Hill, a reputable source. It was a quote from a telephone conversation between Rudy and the reporter. Rudy has not contested the claim.

    Your use of the terminology "reported to have said", as if that introduces some doubt as to whether he said it, is in fact, preposterous.

    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    7 minutes ago, Nice! said:

    Why are you suddenly trying to doggystyle this? The quote is in black and white, and reported by the Hill, a reputable source. It was a quote from a telephone conversation between Rudy and the reporter. Rudy has not contested the claim.

    Your use of the terminology "reported to have said", as if that introduces some doubt as to whether he said it, is in fact, preposterous.

    Do you really think Rudy believes he should be allowed to edit Mueller's report?

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    2 minutes ago, Olsonist said:

    Do you really think Rudy believes what he even says?

    I know there has been reporting to the effect that Rudy and Co. are preparing a counter report.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    21 minutes ago, Dog said:

    I know there has been reporting to the effect that Rudy and Co. are preparing a counter report. damage control.

    FIFY

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    31 minutes ago, Dog said:

    I know there has been reporting to the effect that Rudy and Co. are preparing a counter report.

    And what could the rebuttal even include?  Stuff that they figured Flynn and Cohen snitched about?  What about all the shit Mueller has dug up independently?  Unless Trump has shared all his shenanigans with his lawyers, the rebuttal might address half of Mueller's report and might look a little silly.  My prediction remains that Mueller's report will be do damning and convincing that Trump's supporters in Congress will vanish like a fart in the wind.  Look for a repeat of the Nixon process.  And then SDNY will move in and throw his ass in jail.  And before you go doggie styling, I think Hillary and him should share a cell.  

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    On 1/11/2019 at 6:40 AM, hermetic said:

    well, mueller's a republican - and repub's have been proven by independent research to be dumber than rocks.  so maybe rudy's talking about spellchecking

    Mueller has clearly gone RINO. The Grand Old Party is currently Trumps Own Party. 

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    19 hours ago, Navig8tor said:

    But wait,  you actually said:

    Missed English 101, Periods and commas can be your friend.

    Didn't we,  you retarded FUCKWIT.

    Life is nicer when you put that fuckstick on ignore. 

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    55 minutes ago, Dog said:

    Do you really think Rudy believes he should be allowed to edit Mueller's report?

    A classic exhibit of Trumpism.  The lack of any facts or objective reality is one thing, but here is an exhibit that demonstrates another facet-- words don't mean anything.  When Rudy says plainly and clearly he should be allowed to "correct" the report-- that's not what he meant.  When Trump said a millions times "Mexico will pay for it"--  that's not what he meant, of course.

    A. There is no such thing as a fact.

    B. Words are meanlingless

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites