Sign in to follow this  
badlatitude

Director of Fraudulent, Shut-Down Charity Set To Be World Bank President

Recommended Posts

"resident Donald Trump’s daughter Ivanka Trump is one of a small handful of Trump administration officials being considered for the head of the World Bank after its Obama-appointed head Jim Yong Kim resigned suddenly this week, shocking staffers, the Financial Times reported Friday.

The president has already been accused of nepotism for appointing his daughter to the role of special adviser, and her White House role is unpaid in order to avoid accusations of ethics breaches. Since taking up this official role, Ivanka Trump has met with numerous heads of government and even appeared to replace her father at a G20 world leaders meeting, where she sat next to British Prime Minister Theresa May and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Many at the time noted that this move was unprecedented.

She was also reportedly considered for the role of United Nations ambassador after Nikki Haley announced that she would resign. Trump dismissed the rumors, noting that he would be accused of nepotism if his daughter were appointed.

https://www.newsweek.com/ivanka-trump-world-bank-president-1288815

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jeff will be by shortly to tell us that at least it wasn't Chelsea Clinton.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Olsonist said:

Jeff will be by shortly to say that at least it wasn't Chelsea Clinton.

She's too busy running a 'charity' that should be shut down.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Saorsa said:

She's too busy running a 'charity' that should be shut down.

 

Why should the Clinton foundation be shut down?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mrleft8 said:

Why should the Clinton foundation be shut down?

Do they throw homosexuals off high rise buildings and stone rape victims in Saudi Arabia?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, badlatitude said:

The Trifecta would be Melania becoming Surgeon General and Donald Junior becoming Head of NASA.

In that world, you could be head of the asswipe division. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

19 minutes ago, Olsonist said:

Jeff will be by shortly to tell us that at least it wasn't Chelsea Clinton.

Why, did Chelsea use email?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mickey Rat said:

In that world, you could be head of the asswipe division. 

Because they are furthest from an asswipe? You aren't that bright are ya rat?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, badlatitude said:

The Trifecta would be Melania becoming Surgeon General and Donald Junior becoming Head of NASA.

Barron Shitstain as Director of the NSF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

Because they are furthest from an asswipe? You aren't that bright are ya rat?

He's not very good at this. I think he might be a distant Trump relative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Olsonist said:

Barron Shitstain as Director of the NSF.

I was thinking he would be good at the Federal Reserve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a law preventing someone that talented from doing both jobs?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm stunned it took 30 minutes for a couple of you clowns to pick on a 12 year old.  excellent work

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, badlatitude said:
8 minutes ago, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

Because they are furthest from an asswipe? You aren't that bright are ya rat?

He's not very good at this. I think he might be a distant Trump relative.

Get a room.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, hermetic said:

I'm stunned it took 30 minutes for a couple of you clowns to pick on a 12 year old.  excellent work

Agreed.  Minor children should be off-limits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

Agreed.  Minor children should be off-limits.

If the rightwing hadn't picked on Chelsea during the Clinton White House would senile fools like Soreass still hate her?

Being the only one able to break norms is one of the roots of Trumps press power. Little hypocritical rightwing shits like hermetic don't give a fuck about censoring trump, this is all part of a power grab.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

If the rightwing hadn't picked on Chelsea during the Clinton White House would senile fools like Soreass still hate her?

Being the only one able to break norms is one of the roots of Trumps press power. Little hypocritical rightwing shits like hermetic don't give a fuck about censoring trump, this is all part of a power grab.

I don't measure myself by the actions of others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

If the rightwing hadn't picked on Chelsea during the Clinton White House would senile fools like Soreass still hate her?

Hypocrite much? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

I don't measure myself by the actions of others.

flash is mad because I caught him lying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WTF - is the USA not enough of a laughingstock as it is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, SloopJonB said:

WTF - is the USA not enough of a laughingstock as it is?

 

We sure as hell are!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

image.png.0fcc7682e73f5f74c3cd2858dbdc7aec.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

Agreed.  Minor children should be off-limits.

I would normally agree except that would respect and normalize Shitstain and his family and just fuck that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Olsonist said:
1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

Agreed.  Minor children should be off-limits.

I would normally agree except that would respect and normalize Shitstain and his family and just fuck that.

The problem is that by insulting family, you're putting your politics on the same level as the people who called Obama a monkey; and you're normalizing disrespect for the office of the Presidency

-DSK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I am disrespecting the office of the president. In fact, I don’t respect Shitstain in any way, office, parent or person.

Should I? Make that case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no case to be made.  bashing 12 year olds is a good look for you - wear it proudly

nanny goat sucks used to smack down chelsea and then obama's kids.  good company you're keeping

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

I don't measure myself by the actions of others.

personal virtue is a fine place to make a stand.

I'm pointing out the political strength Republicans have gained and maintained for decades by consistently violating "norms" and then turning around an enforcing "norms" to Democrats who sat back and took it. It should be clear by now that they don't give a shit about competence, merit, making fun of underage children, people with disabilitys, sexual harassment,  racism... the list goes on. They just see them as useful things to weaponize.

For gods sake the Right blew their top when Bill picked Hillary to head his healthcare reform effort. They went on about her being unqualified, blah de fucking blah. Hillary had been a lawyer and in politics for decades. Trump nominates his bimbo daughter to head stuff and they say "sure".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, hermetic said:

no case to be made.  bashing 12 year olds is a good look for you - wear it proudly

Like you proudly wear being a conspiracy theorist.

If you want funny Donald hypocrisy - he invited trashy criminal immigrant Wayne Rooney to the White House for a christmas party because Barron likes watching DC United.  When does using the office for family gain make the family fair game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Saorsa said:

She's too busy running a 'charity' that should be shut down.

 

Propaganda really works.  J Goebbels

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, hermetic said:

no case to be made.  bashing 12 year olds is a good look for you - wear it proudly

nanny goat sucks used to smack down chelsea and then obama's kids.  good company you're keeping

Did you smack NGS back?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does he smack around barnacle balls? No. He lets the lies fly. Hell, hermetic spreads conspiracy lies here. 

Again, this isn't about honesty or values or standards - it's about control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

personal virtue is a fine place to make a stand.

I'm pointing out the political strength Republicans have gained and maintained for decades by consistently violating "norms" and then turning around an enforcing "norms" to Democrats who sat back and took it. It should be clear by now that they don't give a shit about competence, merit, making fun of underage children, people with disabilitys, sexual harassment,  racism... the list goes on. They just see them as useful things to weaponize.

For gods sake the Right blew their top when Bill picked Hillary to head his healthcare reform effort. They went on about her being unqualified, blah de fucking blah. Hillary had been a lawyer and in politics for decades. Trump nominates his bimbo daughter to head stuff and they say "sure".

I see an ocean of difference between Barron Trump, whose parents have done a fine job of insulating him from the bullshit, and Hillary Clinton being put in front of the healthcare effort.

Go ahead and say "they did it first".  By participating in that which you decry, you lose any chance to object.

Have fun bashing pre-teens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Olsonist said:

Yeah, I am disrespecting the office of the president. In fact, I don’t respect Shitstain in any way, office, parent or person.

Should I? Make that case.

Your choice. You lose the right to complain when people make shitty insulting remarks about somebody you like, later on. And it drags the country a tiny step downward

MisJib thinks it would be great to turn into a country full of divisive, snarky, assholes. I disagree. Some people cannot do better for themselves, some people can.

-DSK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just had a thought about this World Bank situation.

What is Vlad's view of that organization?

Would he want to fuck it up?

If he did, that would explain this latest bit of surrealism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Steam Flyer said:

Your choice. You lose the right to complain when people make shitty insulting remarks about somebody you like, later on. And it drags the country a tiny step downward

MisJib thinks it would be great to turn into a country full of divisive, snarky, assholes. I disagree. Some people cannot do better for themselves, some people can.

-DSK

I know it's my choice. But should I respect this piece of shit as a president, parent or person? Is there no line which he could cross which would absolve me of that duty? I ask because to me, he crossed that line quite some time ago. Your line may be drawn elsewhere. I'm asking you to specify where that line is.

Multiply divorced, cheating on his wife after child birth, not even speaking to one daughters, discussing another daughter as a sex object, am I then required to respect this piece of shit as a parent? Really?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Olsonist said:
1 hour ago, hermetic said:

no case to be made.  bashing 12 year olds is a good look for you - wear it proudly

nanny goat sucks used to smack down chelsea and then obama's kids.  good company you're keeping

Did you smack NGS back?

yep.  he was a divisive asshole who deserved to get tossed when he went there

is he a friend of yours and flashes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, hermetic said:

yep.  he was a divisive asshole who deserved to get tossed when he went there

is he a friend of yours and flashes?

That'll be simple. Show us a cite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Olsonist said:
7 minutes ago, hermetic said:

yep.  he was a divisive asshole who deserved to get tossed when he went there

is he a friend of yours and flashes?

That'll be simple. Show us a cite.

yeah, this is all about me.  not you, flash, and ngs

nice try though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, hermetic said:

yeah, this is all about me.  not you, flash, and ngs

nice try though

It is about you right now. Got cite?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Olsonist said:

I know it's my choice. But should I respect this piece of shit as a president, parent or person? Is there no line which he could cross which would absolve me of that duty? I ask because to me, he crossed that line quite some time ago. Your line may be drawn elsewhere. I'm asking you to specify where that line is.

Multiply divorced, cheating on his wife after child birth, not even speaking to one daughters, discussing another daughter as a sex object, am I then required to respect this piece of shit as a parent? Really?

When I get to the point of believing that the office of the Presidency itself is not worth respecting, I will be leaving the country. Unfortunately I am not eligible for dual citizenship anywhere else, so that pushes the option a bit further back for me, personally.

Where do I draw the line? Pointless smears directed at family, for one. For that matter pointless smears directed at the President for no better reason than to be insulting.

You don't have to look far to see me pointing out what a shitty President Trump has been, giving concrete examples. I hope it's far less common for me to just say what a piece of shit Trump is.... a crook, racist, liar, possible probable traitor.... well the list goes on and on. Not sure how to convey respect for the office at the same time, but there is a difference of kind not just degree.

Bear in mind that the whole "all news is fake, therefor MY fake news is just as good as yours" and the very similar "all politicians are liars and crooks so therefor MY liar and crook is just as good as yours" is a fairly standard rightie schtick. It's a trap.

-DSK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Olsonist said:

I know it's my choice. But should I respect this piece of shit as a president, parent or person? Is there no line which he could cross which would absolve me of that duty? I ask because to me, he crossed that line quite some time ago. Your line may be drawn elsewhere. I'm asking you to specify where that line is.

Multiply divorced, cheating on his wife after child birth, not even speaking to one daughters, discussing another daughter as a sex object, am I then required to respect this piece of shit as a parent? Really?

I agree with all of that.  

What does Barron have to do with all of that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Bus Driver said:

I agree with all of that.  

What does Barron have to do with all of that?

It wasn't really about Barron. It was about Shitstain appointing Barron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Olsonist said:
55 minutes ago, hermetic said:

yeah, this is all about me.  not you, flash, and ngs

nice try though

It is about you right now. Got cite?

no it's not.  it's about you guy's bashing little kids

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, hermetic said:

yep.  he was a divisive asshole who deserved to get tossed when he went there

is he a friend of yours and flashes?

What’s it got to do with me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Olsonist said:

I know it's my choice. But should I respect this piece of shit as a president, parent or person? Is there no line which he could cross which would absolve me of that duty? I ask because to me, he crossed that line quite some time ago. Your line may be drawn elsewhere. I'm asking you to specify where that line is.

Multiply divorced, cheating on his wife after child birth, not even speaking to one daughters, discussing another daughter as a sex object, am I then required to respect this piece of shit as a parent? Really?

You forgot the two convictions for fraud, four bankruptcies, hundreds of legal actions, blatant serial lying to everyone and anyone, benefitting from office, not to mention the narcissism, nepotism and a total lack of statesmanship and even humour.

Then there is his preference for absolute dictators and their word in preference to his own specialist advisors.

And the list will get a lot longer once Mueller’s report is made public.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In simplest terms he has NO redeeming qualities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SloopJonB said:

In simplest terms he has NO redeeming qualities.

And Trump clearly doesn’t respect the office of president himself.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Sidecar said:

You forgot the two convictions for fraud, four bankruptcies, hundreds of legal actions, blatant serial lying to everyone and anyone, benefitting from office, not to mention the narcissism, nepotism and a total lack of statesmanship and even humour.

Then there is his preference for absolute dictators and their word in preference to his own specialist advisors.

And the list will get a lot longer once Mueller’s report is made public.

 

Six Bankruptcies, google it; I provided the cite in another thread around noon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Mrleft8 said:

Why should the Clinton foundation be shut down?

Well to be honest, it doesn't need to be.  Donations have dried up once Hillary lost.  Once they've used up the existing commitments it will go away on it's own.

Their appeal is becoming more selective.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, billy backstay said:

 

Six Bankruptcies, google it; I provided the cite in another thread around noon.

 I know, but I think two were related to the others, so I gave him the benefit of the doubt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Saorsa said:

Well to be honest, it doesn't need to be.  Donations have dried up once Hillary lost.  Once they've used up the existing commitments it will go away on it's own.

 Their appeal is becoming more selective.

The Minister being honest? He told a funny!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Saorsa said:

Well to be honest, it doesn't need to be.  Donations have dried up once Hillary lost.  Once they've used up the existing commitments it will go away on it's own.

Their appeal is becoming more selective.

 

 

Thank you for responding. It still doesn't explain why the Clinton Foundation should be shut down.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Saorsa said:

Well to be honest, it doesn't need to be.  Donations have dried up once Hillary lost.  Once they've used up the existing commitments it will go away on it's own.

Their appeal is becoming more selective.

 

 

The Clinton foundation was a form of tax deductible influence peddling.    You bought some connected attention, just like donations to oral Roberts Roberts University for the other side.    Trump foundation was a fraud.   Not the same.

Lets try a simple version.    Pay money to some policeman’s benevelnt fund.  It’s a legal charity but donors hope the cops will see the sticker on their window and let them off.   The charity does some good.  That is the Clinton foundation, and likely even oral Roberts university,

Pay money to a dirty cop when he pulls you over, since he ‘says’ he will give it to charity and you can skip the ticket.    Trump foundation.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Lark said:

The Clinton foundation was a form of tax deductible influence peddling.    You bought some connected attention, just like donations to oral Roberts Roberts University for the other side.    Trump foundation was a fraud.   Not the same.

Lets try a simple version.    Pay money to some policeman’s benevelnt fund.  It’s a legal charity but donors hope the cops will see the sticker on their window and let them off.   The charity does some good.  That is the Clinton foundation, and likely even oral Roberts university,

Pay money to a dirty cop when he pulls you over, since he ‘says’ he will give it to charity and you can skip the ticket.    Trump foundation.

I think you are completely wrong.

Try again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mrleft8 said:

I think you are completely wrong.

Try again.

Oh?   Please elucidate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Steam Flyer said:

MisJib thinks it would be great to turn into a country full of divisive, snarky, assholes.

We are a country of divisive, snarky, assholes. But I'm honest about being a divisive snarky asshole. There's a whole bunch of hermetics who think their shit doesn't stink, but mine - and people he thinks are me - does - and fuck that double standard. Just like fuck the Republican double standard where a white supremacist gets his committee assignments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, hermetic said:

no it's not.  it's about you guy's bashing little kids

It's not like we are putting them in cages overseen by sex offenders when they cross the border. Where they die. Nor are we defending doing that. Nor are we saying they deserved to die because their parents brought them to this country.

So fuck you and your fauxtrage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Lark said:

Oh?   Please elucidate.

Please, continue to pontificate, while I doze, perhaps I'll respond later, after I have a snack, of beef Wellington, and steamed asparagus, perhaps a dessert of sea salt chocolate, with a bit of draught pale ale to wash it down....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mrleft8 said:

Please, continue to pontificate, while I doze, perhaps I'll respond later, after I have a snack, of beef Wellington, and steamed asparagus, perhaps a dessert of sea salt chocolate, with a bit of draught pale ale to wash it down....

You lost me on the Asparagus,   That stuff can kill you,   I have no evidence, but I’m just certain of it.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Lark said:

You lost me on the Asparagus,   That stuff can kill you,   I have no evidence, but I’m just certain of it.    

Really it just makes your piss stink.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Lark said:

You lost me on the Asparagus,   That stuff can kill you,   I have no evidence, but I’m just certain of it.    

It's quite edible if smothered in large amounts of hollandaise sauce.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:
19 hours ago, Steam Flyer said:

MisJib thinks it would be great to turn into a country full of divisive, snarky, assholes.

We are a country of divisive, snarky, assholes. But I'm honest about being a divisive snarky asshole. There's a whole bunch of hermetics who think their shit doesn't stink, but mine - and people he thinks are me - does - and fuck that double standard. Just like fuck the Republican double standard where a white supremacist gets his committee assignments.

Incorrect.

We are country of wide diversity, united by a couple of ideas and a common identity. Each little faction has it's share of snarky assholes, and the people whose character/personality makes them enjoy snarky assholishness gravitate to the party of Rush/Hannity but there are some left over for all the other factions.

Being a snarky asshole doesn't give you power. It doesn't make you smart. It apparently makes you feel like you're "getting even" but that is a hollow victory.

FWIW I agree with you about "fuck the double standard" but the answer IMHO is not to be a mirror-image snarky asshole. Unless you just enjoy it.

-DSK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Lark said:

You lost me on the Asparagus,   That stuff can kill you,   I have no evidence, but I’m just certain of it.    

How to cook asparagus:  cut the stems off. Steam in salted water until al dente. Throw away the asparagus.  Throw away the water, clean the steamer, ventilate the kitchen. Go outside and grill some nice fresh sweet corn. Imagine the White House cleaned and steamed after the current occupant has been ousted.  Enjoy.  

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Steam Flyer said:

FWIW I agree with you about "fuck the double standard" but the answer IMHO is not to be a mirror-image snarky asshole.

It's not an ideal answer, true. But waiting patiently for Republicans to hit rock bottom like the addicts they are will take longer than my patience; it's much like waiting for "the market" to correct every imbalance in life. Yeah, it'll happen, sometime. And lots of stuff will get screwed up, some permanently, between now and then.

 

I like asparagus - with pasta and ham? mmm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:
2 hours ago, Steam Flyer said:

FWIW I agree with you about "fuck the double standard" but the answer IMHO is not to be a mirror-image snarky asshole.

It's not an ideal answer, true. But waiting patiently for Republicans to hit rock bottom like the addicts they are will take longer than my patience; it's much like waiting for "the market" to correct every imbalance in life. Yeah, it'll happen, sometime. And lots of stuff will get screwed up, some permanently, between now and then.

In world where people who enjoy snarky assholery are already being courted by not just Rush/Hannity but a whole mega-million dollar hate-spew industry, what makes you think that -your-  spewage is so special and wonderful that you'll attract anybody to your faction?

I have to say, I occasionally enjoy heaping scorn onto people who deserve it. I try to indulge sparingly. You're trying to make a virtue out of it, and that shit don't wash off easily. Aside from that, the people whom I'd prefer to ally with, if I must be in some faction or another, are people who are relatively well-informed and rational. If you're going to war, you want the scientists and engineers on your side.

-DSK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Steam Flyer said:

Aside from that, the people whom I'd prefer to ally with, if I must be in some faction or another, are people who are relatively well-informed and rational. If you're going to war, you want the scientists and engineers on your side.

I worked in engineering and science, and with enough engineers and scientists to know they aren't necessarily the most rational bunch - and - and - their rational thought can lead to some ugly places. From history - Bill Shockley. From the present - the Facebook/Google privacy clusterfuck of lies. As a drunk investment advisor told me at a party when I said I was engineer "I hate working for fucking engineers. they always think they know everything, then fuck it up".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, dogballs Tom said:

It's quite edible if smothered in large amounts of hollandaise sauce.

Better yet.....

asparagus.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Left Shift said:

 Imagine the White House cleaned and steamed after the current occupant has been ousted. 

They're going to need strong solvents - steam won't do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, SloopJonB said:
1 hour ago, Left Shift said:

 Imagine the White House cleaned and steamed after the current occupant has been ousted. 

They're going to need strong solvents - steam won't do it. 

I would suggest starting with exorcism and working up from there.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, SloopJonB said:
1 hour ago, Left Shift said:

 Imagine the White House cleaned and steamed after the current occupant has been ousted. 

They're going to need strong solvents - steam won't do it.

Damn right I won't do it. Maybe Somebody Else will take the job

-DSK

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

Better yet.....

asparagus.jpg

Awesome. Would be more wholesome with hollandaise though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Director of Fraudulent, Shut-Down Charity Set To Be Pick Next World Bank President

President Donald Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, is overseeing the internal search for a nominee to lead the World Bank — but is not herself a candidate for the job, according to the White House.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/14/white-house-ivanka-trump-not-head-of-world-bank-1099104

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Olsonist said:

Director of Fraudulent, Shut-Down Charity Set To Be Pick Next World Bank President

President Donald Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, is overseeing the internal search for a nominee to lead the World Bank — but is not herself a candidate for the job, according to the White House.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/14/white-house-ivanka-trump-not-head-of-world-bank-1099104

Another entry in the YCMTSU sweepstakes.  Or, truth is stranger than fiction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Olsonist said:

Director of Fraudulent, Shut-Down Charity Set To Be Pick Next World Bank President

President Donald Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, is overseeing the internal search for a nominee to lead the World Bank — but is not herself a candidate for the job, according to the White House.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/14/white-house-ivanka-trump-not-head-of-world-bank-1099104

Maybe they’ll go to Jared. 

He’s been given so many other jobs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Ivanka will not be in the running but gets to choose the next head of the World Bank.

Thank God for an unsuccessful trademark thief who cannot run a business, that will be able to nominate the next World Bank head. Said no one ever.

"President Donald Trump’s daughter and adviser will work with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney to nominate a successor to outgoing World Bank President Jim Yong Kim, spokeswoman Jessica Ditto said in a statement. The World Bank board traditionally accepts the U.S. nominee for the position" https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-14/ivanka-trump-to-help-pick-world-bank-chief-but-isn-t-a-contender

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, badlatitude said:

 

Ivanka will not be in the running but gets to choose the next head of the World Bank.

Thank God for an unsuccessful trademark thief who cannot run a business, that will be able to nominate the next World Bank head. Said no one ever.

"President Donald Trump’s daughter and adviser will work with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney to nominate a successor to outgoing World Bank President Jim Yong Kim, spokeswoman Jessica Ditto said in a statement. The World Bank board traditionally accepts the U.S. nominee for the position" https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-14/ivanka-trump-to-help-pick-world-bank-chief-but-isn-t-a-contender

 

Clearly the Trump are great judges of character. They picked Flynn, Manafort, Sessions and many others for positions of responsibility which they clearly couldn't handle. I expect not less of them this time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some sort of cheap hustler or criminal in charge of the World Bank.

Great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this