Lifted Tack

Trump grifting from the get-go - lets see the spin on this one

Recommended Posts

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/new-evidence-possible-wrongdoing-trump-inaugural-committee_us_5c5edc8ce4b0eec79b23cf83

Let me guess, lying malarkey will say that these people were just incompetent, But wait, doesn't Trump employ only the best people?

"The committee paid a total of $700,000 to the Trump International Hotel for event spaces for four days in January 2017. At the time, a consultant working for the inaugural committee expressed her concern over email that the price quoted by the Trump hotel — $175,000 per day for several event spaces — was too high, as ProPublica and WNYC reported in December.

“Please take into consideration that when this is audited it will become public knowledge,” wrote Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, an experienced New York-based event planner, suggesting a fair rate for the event spaces would be at most $85,000 per day, less than half of what was ultimately paid. That fee did not cover catering."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Lifted Tack said:

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/new-evidence-possible-wrongdoing-trump-inaugural-committee_us_5c5edc8ce4b0eec79b23cf83

Let me guess, lying malarkey will say that these people were just incompetent, But wait, doesn't Trump employ only the best people?

"The committee paid a total of $700,000 to the Trump International Hotel for event spaces for four days in January 2017. At the time, a consultant working for the inaugural committee expressed her concern over email that the price quoted by the Trump hotel — $175,000 per day for several event spaces — was too high, as ProPublica and WNYC reported in December.

“Please take into consideration that when this is audited it will become public knowledge,” wrote Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, an experienced New York-based event planner, suggesting a fair rate for the event spaces would be at most $85,000 per day, less than half of what was ultimately paid. That fee did not cover catering."

If I recall correctly, Ivanka was responsible for setting those rates.  Maybe she's not one of the best people.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When are Ivanka, Jarrod and Junior gonna be dragged? 

Just need to know if I should get more popcorn now or later?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably wanted to pay for the transition while still making a profit

From The Guardian: “Seeing Bannon, Trump turned on him and screamed: Why are you letting him steal my fucking money? Bannon and Christie together set out to explain to Trump federal law. Months before the election, the law said, the nominees of the two major parties were expected to prepare to take control of the government. The government supplied them with office space in downtown DC, along with computers and rubbish bins and so on, but the campaigns paid their people. To which Trump replied: Fuck the law. I don’t give a fuck about the law. I want my fucking money. Bannon and Christie tried to explain that Trump couldn’t have both his money and a transition.

Shut it down, said Trump. Shut down the transition.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How many MILLIONS in speaking fees directly from Russian sources did the clintons get after the Uranium One deal again?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting... seven departments of the US Government signed off on that deal, at levels up & down the food chains of all of them.

Youd think that Hillary had control over the decision based on Facebook worthy memes & poorly informed righties.

Or perhaps they have an agenda, not an issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, phillysailor said:

Interesting... seven departments of the US Government signed off on that deal, at levels up & down the food chains of all of them.

Youd think that Hillary had control over the decision based on Facebook worthy memes & poorly informed righties.

Or perhaps they have an agenda, not an issue.

And how many 'agencies' said trump colluded with russia... and yet mueller apparently has nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Barnacle Balls said:

And how many 'agencies' said trump colluded with russia... and yet mueller apparently has nothing.

You asked him and he told you it was a nothingburger? How many indictments so far? Your orange bufoon is fucked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Barnacle Balls said:

How many MILLIONS in speaking fees directly from Russian sources did the clintons get after the Uranium One deal again?

 

Uranium One Balls Nothing. That nutter conspiracy has been debunked so often even a caveman knew it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Barnacle Balls said:

So how do you justify the extraordinary amounts of cash they received from Russian firms? 

Why don't you start with any of the fact checking sites on the stupid Uranium hack piece and get back to us.  I don't fix stupid on Mondays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is Barnacle Brain trying for "The Stupidest Poster ON SA" title again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, d'ranger said:

Why don't you start with any of the fact checking sites on the stupid Uranium hack piece and get back to us.  I don't fix stupid on Mondays.

i-checked-snopes-my-research-is-complete

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Barnacle Balls said:

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS4Z6wUxoTyipTU7PBuxkg

As President, was Obama authorized to speak/negotiate on behalf of the United States?  (Yes would be the correct answer)

As a campaign chairman, was Mr. Manafort?  (No would be the correct answer)

If you feel the Mr. Mueller should investigate President Obama's comments regarding illegality, go ahead and drop him a note.

Trying to use this as some sort of defense of what Mr. Manafort did shows how low you are willing to go in defending the President.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Fuck the law. I don't give a fuck about the law. I want my fucking money." ------ At last, a clear and defined policy from the conman in the White House.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Barnacle Balls said:

How many MILLIONS in speaking fees directly from Russian sources did the clintons get after the Uranium One deal again?

 

Hijacked in 5 posts.

You blokes are slipping.

Grifting from the go get?

How soon did they start doubling club fees, promoting products.

I wonder how many names are on the clubs visitor books that would, two years later appear as appointees to influential positions like Veterans Affairs?

The Government Accountability Office will investigate whether members of Mar-a-Lago, President Donald Trump’s private club in Palm Beach, Florida, improperly influenced the Department of Veterans Affairs, including over a $10 billion contract to modernize veterans’ health records, according to a letter from the watchdog office released by Democratic lawmakers Monday.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/26/mar-a-lago-trump-investigation-va-contracts-1015803 

the background

https://www.propublica.org/article/ike-perlmutter-bruce-moskowitz-marc-sherman-shadow-rulers-of-the-va

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SloopJonB said:

Is Barnacle Brain trying for "The Stupidest Poster ON SA" title again?

He keeps trying but the competition is remarkably strong. I don't think he has made it to the top (bottom?) yet.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

key word in all these posts... investgate.

 

Partisan  witch hunts without a shred of evidence.  In the meantime, we have outright weaponizing of government agencies like the FBI and the IRS by hacks Comey and Lerner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Shortforbob said:

Hijacked in 5 posts.

You blokes are slipping.

Grifting from the go get?

How soon did they start doubling club fees, promoting products.

I wonder how many names are on the clubs visitor books that would, two years later appear as appointees to influential positions like Veterans Affairs?

The Government Accountability Office will investigate whether members of Mar-a-Lago, President Donald Trump’s private club in Palm Beach, Florida, improperly influenced the Department of Veterans Affairs, including over a $10 billion contract to modernize veterans’ health records, according to a letter from the watchdog office released by Democratic lawmakers Monday.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/26/mar-a-lago-trump-investigation-va-contracts-1015803 

the background

https://www.propublica.org/article/ike-perlmutter-bruce-moskowitz-marc-sherman-shadow-rulers-of-the-va

An additional worthwhile question to ask is "How many ambassadorships have been handed out to More-and-Larger members"?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Left Shift said:

An additional worthwhile question to ask is "How many ambassadorships have been handed out to More-and-Larger members"?

 

at least 8.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2019/02/08/donald-trump-picks-ambassadors-golf-club-mar-lago-members/2748260002/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Barnacle Balls said:

key word in all these posts... investgate.

 

Partisan  witch hunts without a shred of evidence.  In the meantime, we have outright weaponizing of government agencies like the FBI and the IRS by hacks Comey and Lerner.

No evidence?

You really need a moment of clarity.  The kind that occurs when you pull your head out of your ass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Barnacle Balls said:

key word in all these posts... investgate.

 

Partisan  witch hunts without a shred of evidence.  In the meantime, we have outright weaponizing of government agencies like the FBI and the IRS by hacks Comey and Lerner.

Is Investgate the new Watergate? You really are doubling down on the stupid.  It's not going to end well for Trump, his fat ass is in the crack and you can't get your nose out of it.

It never ends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, d'ranger said:

Is Investgate the new Watergate? You really are doubling down on the stupid.  It's not going to end well for Trump, his fat ass is in the crack and you can't get your nose out of it.

It never ends.

No let me guess, his days are spent consuming Fox news, infowars and Breitbart,  nothing alike a little distortion of the facts hiding in plain sight, in fact you need a lot of distortion to stick you head up your ass, its not a perspective I'm willing to share.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Barnacle Balls said:

And yet no one here has named a single piece of EVIDENCE in all of these posts of any wrongdoing. 

I supose it depends on your personal definition of wrong doing.

Do you think using your position to promote people that pay you money is doing wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

McDonald only promotes the best people. The US ambassador to South Africa is a handbag designer who specializes in the $10,000-up market. Very qualified. She made bags for Princess Diana, so she's a somebody.

Mar-a-Lago is a short drive from her mansion. She was brought up in a rich white South African home, so she'd enjoy the ambience of scurrying brown-skinned illegal underpaid workers at Trump's golf club.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Barnacle Balls said:

And yet no one here has named a single piece of EVIDENCE in all of these posts of any wrongdoing. 

If you completely ignore the multiple investigations, several indictments, guilty please, convictions, and prison sentences - you are correct.

While none have directly been attached to the President, I understand Mr. Mueller is not finished with his investigation, and the same can be said for SDNY.

When they are done and release their findings, you are likely to be singing a different tune.  If you are still here, under that avatar, that is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Navig8tor said:

No let me guess, his days are spent consuming Fox news, infowars and Breitbart,  nothing alike a little distortion of the facts hiding in plain sight, in fact you need a lot of distortion to stick you head up your ass, its not a perspective I'm willing to share.

Don't forget RW radio and talkingpoints4nutters.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Happy said:

McDonald only promotes the best people. The US ambassador to South Africa is a handbag designer who specializes in the $10,000-up market. Very qualified. She made bags for Princess Diana, so she's a somebody.

Mar-a-Lago is a short drive from her mansion. She was brought up in a rich white South African home, so she'd enjoy the ambience of scurrying brown-skinned illegal underpaid workers at Trump's golf club.

What puzzles me is whether these appointees realise they are supposed to actually live in these places :D

Ah well..another example of Trump setting the fashion.

Really is feudal/medieval.

Just don't tell him about fiefdoms..oh whoops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

If you completely ignore the multiple investigations, several indictments, guilty please, convictions, and prison sentences - you are correct.

While none have directly been attached to the President, I understand Mr. Mueller is not finished with his investigation, and the same can be said for SDNY.

When they are done and release their findings, you are likely to be singing a different tune.  If you are still here, under that avatar, that is.

as may you all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Barnacle Brain still hasn't fully grasped the link between smoke & fire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SloopJonB said:

Barnacle Brain still hasn't fully grasped the link between smoke & fire.

Early neanderthal perhaps. Homo erectus?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Navig8tor said:

Early neanderthal perhaps. Homo erectus?

Homo stupidus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Navig8tor said:

….. Homo erectus?

Damn, now he's gonna get real mad. Right-wing trumpettes aren't goddamn homos...……...although some of the guys they fuck in public toilets are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Happy said:

Damn, now he's gonna get real mad. Right-wing trumpettes aren't goddamn homos...……...although some of the guys they fuck in public toilets are.

Naw he just thinks that's just what you do, every-time you use a public toilet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Barnacle Balls said:

i-checked-snopes-my-research-is-complete

 

 

Oh looky.  Another unfair source to be a victim of.   It never fucking ends.

Snopes articles are one of the most heavily cited sources available. The irony here?  Your argument is to parrot a meme.

Brilliant.

Your idiocy is unique in its purity.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, benwynn said:

Oh looky.  Another unfair source to be a victim of.   It never fucking ends.

Snopes articles are one of the most heavily cited sources available. The irony here?  Your argument is to parrot a meme.

Brilliant.

Your idiocy is unique in its purity ubiquitous in your elk.

 

Modified for my own nefarious purposes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is ubiquitous but you have to admit that it's particularly virulent in Barnacle Brain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

As President, was Obama authorized to speak/negotiate on behalf of the United States?  (Yes would be the correct answer)

As a campaign chairman, was Mr. Manafort?  (No would be the correct answer)

If you feel the Mr. Mueller should investigate President Obama's comments regarding illegality, go ahead and drop him a note.

Trying to use this as some sort of defense of what Mr. Manafort did shows how low you are willing to go in defending the President.

he's too stupid to understand actual facts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, benwynn said:

Snopes articles are one of the most heavily cited sources available.

Umm, just because it's a heavily cited source doesn't mean it's reliable.

Just sayin'.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, justsomeguy! said:

Umm, just because it's a heavily cited source doesn't mean it's reliable.

Just sayin'.

How's it rate against a meme of a duck wearing a hat?   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, benwynn said:
6 hours ago, justsomeguy! said:

Umm, just because it's a heavily cited source doesn't mean it's reliable.

Just sayin'.

How's it rate against a meme of a duck wearing a hat?   

Depends on the hat.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

guilty please

Things will go much better Don if you just get on with it.  Plead guilty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have rarely - and I mean rarely - seen such a total and continous thrashing of a PA member.  Barnacle butthead truly holds a unique position in this community.  Normally, I would expect to see at least a couple of the same characters jump up to his defense:  dog styling, saorsa, happy jack..... but no.  He has reached so far and so hard that even the "others" that support the cheeto won't speak up in his defense.

Cudos Barnacle Buttwipe.  Truly.  You have reached a level of stupid rarely seen here, where NO one is willing to take your side.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, hasher said:
14 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

guilty please

Things will go much better Don if you just get on with it.  Plead guilty.

Freudian slip or fat fingers on an iPhone?

You choose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

You choose.

I would like to find my humor button back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:
6 hours ago, benwynn said:
7 hours ago, justsomeguy! said:

Umm, just because it's a heavily cited source doesn't mean it's reliable.

Just sayin'.

How's it rate against a meme of a duck wearing a hat?   

Depends on the hat. 

I was gonna say that it depends on the duck.......

-DSK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

Depends on the hat.

 

41 minutes ago, Steam Flyer said:

I was gonna say that it depends on the duck.......

A Mallard with a MAGA hat.   

Or a John Deere cap if I can't get it to stay still. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, benwynn said:
1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

Depends on the hat.

 

1 hour ago, Steam Flyer said:

I was gonna say that it depends on the duck.......

A Mallard with a MAGA hat.   

Or a John Deere cap if I can't get it to stay still. 

I'd prefer a duck with an NRA hat.  Lots of levels to that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bus Driver said:
32 minutes ago, benwynn said:
1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

Depends on the hat.

 

1 hour ago, Steam Flyer said:

I was gonna say that it depends on the duck.......

A Mallard with a MAGA hat.   

Or a John Deere cap if I can't get it to stay still. 

I'd prefer a duck with an NRA hat.  Lots of levels to that.

Isn't there a hammer-something duck? Maybe a hammer-and-sickle duck in an NRA hat?

"When you pry it from my cold dead bill!"

-DSK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can fool all of the people some of the time You can fool Trump supporters all of the time. As Eva Dent

“A young man who's got very little going for himself except he's got a great first name. He challenged us. We have, say, 35,000 people tonight, and he has, say, 200 people, 300 people," Trump said at his rally in El Paso. "Not too good. In fact, what I would do, that may be the end of his presidential bid."

Trump said the media would fail to acknowledge that he had the larger rally, The Hill reported. “They will say Beto O’Rourke—that’s his last name, right, O’Rourke?—had a wonderful rally of about 15 people" Trump said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Barnacle Balls said:

2020's gonna be a great GFY to you guys... again.

 

DzLknPoVsAANq_J.jpg:large

How did you like the last time around the block?  The next won is going to show you all the money in hell will never save you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Barnacle Balls said:

2020's gonna be a great GFY to you guys... again.

DzLknPoVsAANq_J.jpg:large

I don't want to pop the continuous bubble of stupid you live in, but since this thread had been all about showing you just how wrong you are I might as well.  Your 'meme' is just as wrong as most memes are, and if that is how you form your opinions then a lot of your other statements make loads of sense.

https://theweek.com/speedreads/823268/trump-seemed-interested-beto-orourkes-evidently-larger-crowd-during-el-paso-rally

7000+ at Beto's march to protest, FYI.  Your meme picture was not taken during the actual event.

And just so you don't try to pull the 'cite source' BS, TheWeek is a highly factual slightly left leaning Journal.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-week/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy Malarkey lied? He’s really not going to get that planet in the afterlife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Raz'r said:

Happy Malarkey lied? He’s really not going to get that planet in the afterlife.

Did you mean to post this in another thread?  He hasn't commented in this one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hard to tell Hopeless Jack apart from Barnacle Brain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SloopJonB said:

Hard to tell Hopeless Jack apart from Barnacle Brain.

They do seem to be kindred spirits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

Did you mean to post this in another thread?  He hasn't commented in this one.

Oopsey!  so many trolls!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But pictures at the inauguration are not refuted by President dumbfuck and his moronic followers but this showing something they like is believed. This fucking conversation is surreal.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, HuronBouy said:

But pictures at the inauguration are not refuted by President dumbfuck and his moronic followers but this showing something they like is believed. This fucking conversation is surreal.  

Naw.  They called attention to it when the orange cheeto decided this would be a good time to comment on something - which turned out to be yet another blowhard lie with no factual basis.  Seriously, ycmtsu.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, HuronBouy said:

But pictures at the inauguration are not refuted by President dumbfuck and his moronic followers but this showing something they like is believed. This fucking conversation is surreal.  

Ah, yes.  The Inauguration.  He can lie about timing and camera angle, and people fading into the background.

He can't lie about this - but he will.

crowd.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Bus Driver said:

Ah, yes.  The Inauguration.  He can lie about timing and camera angle, and people fading into the background.

He can't lie about this - but he will.

crowd.jpg

more guards than citizens. Welcome to the Police State

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remind me again who Hillary Clinton was?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, SloopJonB said:

Remind me again who Hillary Clinton was?

She was the wicked witch of the west, the boogeyman that Republitards bring out to scare the stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Barnacle Balls said:

el oh el

side-by-side-tweets.jpg

Wow.  0 for 2.  Want to go for the strike out?  Another situation where the picture was intentionally taken at the wrong time.

https://www.omaha.com/news/metro/crowd-at-hillary-clinton-s-omaha-rally-exceeded-with-overflow/article_0c8bc1b0-5946-11e6-abf7-6f6f26e598bf.html

You're an idiot.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

Ah, yes.  The Inauguration.  He can lie about timing and camera angle, and people fading into the background.

He can't lie about this - but he will.

M whatever.  Ball-less. Keep eating your sour grapes.  You backed the wrong horse.  It is because you do not have clew in life. 

I intended this for the person who has barnacle around the boat that never moves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Raz'r said:

more guards than citizens. Welcome to the Police State

Jesus that’s embarrassing. Maybe trump should resort back to getting paid actors for crowd pictures.

SAD!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, hasher said:

M whatever.  Ball-less. Keep eating your sour grapes.  You backed the wrong horse.  It is because you do not have clew in life. 

I intended this for the person who has barnacle around the boat that never moves.

I may be mistaken - but, I think you're having issues with the quoting thing... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Fakenews said:

paid actors

Is that a joke?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, hasher said:

Is that a joke?

No. When he came down the escalator at Trump Tower those were all paid actors.  They got $50 each

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, A guy in the Chesapeake said:

I may be mistaken - but, I think you're having issues with the quoting thing... 

I recognized and I tried to straighten it out by referring to the barnacle M.  Please forgive.  I apologize.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, hasher said:

I recognized and I tried to straighten it out by referring to the barnacle M.  Please forgive.  I apologize.

No apologies are necessary - just tryin' to help.   Apologies if you already know this, but, if you're selecting a section of a quote from poster B from within a response authored by posterA?  The "quote this" function assigns the quote to "Poster A" - if ya want to quote a section of PosterB's comment?  ya gotta go back up to his original post and quote from there.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, A guy in the Chesapeake said:

No apologies are necessary - just tryin' to help.   Apologies if you already know this, but, if you're selecting a section of a quote from poster B from within a response authored by posterA?  The "quote this" function assigns the quote to "Poster A" - if ya want to quote a section of PosterB's comment?  ya gotta go back up to his original post and quote from there.  

I don't want to be an unnecessary asshole.  But I will be one when it think it is required.  Ballass gets on my nerves.  It is all in good fun?  Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, hasher said:

M whatever.  Ball-less. Keep eating your sour grapes.  You backed the wrong horse.  It is because you do not have clew in life. 

I intended this for the person who has barnacle around the boat that never moves.

claw. I get it.  cause sailing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, hasher said:

I don't want to be an unnecessary asshole.  

Well, you're in good company.  Around here, we're all necessary assholes.  :D

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Barnacle Balls said:

cause sailing

Imagine that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account