• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

dogsailors

valiant esprit 37

16 posts in this topic

Hey I am seriously considering a valiant esprit 37. Does anyone have any experience? Real info I dont want to here about blisters. the one I have a contract on has never had a blister problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey I am seriously considering a valiant esprit 37. Does anyone have any experience? Real info I dont want to here about blisters. the one I have a contract on has never had a blister problem.

 

The former editor of Yachting World Mag had one. He wrote a lot about his experiences with the 37. I recall that he was very happy with the boat and touted its sailing and build quality a lot.

 

I think it is a very fine choice .

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey I am seriously considering a valiant esprit 37. Does anyone have any experience? Real info I dont want to here about blisters. the one I have a contract on has never had a blister problem.

 

From the V-37's listed on Yachtworld, appears that most of these boats are late -70's to early -80's. While you may not want to "here" about blisters because the boat you are looking at "has never had a blister problem." -- Never say never. You may want to budget for a barrier coat anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing about the early Valiants (when they were built by Tollycraft in WA) was their 'experimentation' with fire-retardant resins. There were a few model years where they tried this and it wasn't long after that the boats developed serious blistering.

 

I do not know if the Espirit had this problem. It was sort of a one-off.

 

Where's Bob when these conversations come up?? :unsure:

 

He's the authority, no doubt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had one too, hull number one RICKY NELSON.

It was a lovable boat. A bit too much weather helm and I had a too bendy rig in it for single spreaders.

I had no blister problems that I recall. I had non skid issues and the overall quality was really just so so.

But I loved that boat.

The cockpit was a bit small and I'm 6'3 and there was place for me to spread out.

That was one of the prettiest fannys I have ever drawn.

My young, pregnant wife thought the V berth was too high. My kids are 26 and 28 now.

I always stop and admire the beauty of the Esprit whenever I see one.

I sailed the boat a lot by myself and it never let me down.

Boy, the memories that brings back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for weighing in Mr. Perry. :)

 

 

I had one too, hull number one RICKY NELSON.

It was a lovable boat. A bit too much weather helm and I had a too bendy rig in it for single spreaders.

I had no blister problems that I recall. I had non skid issues and the overall quality was really just so so.

But I loved that boat.

The cockpit was a bit small and I'm 6'3 and there was place for me to spread out.

That was one of the prettiest fannys I have ever drawn.

My young, pregnant wife thought the V berth was too high. My kids are 26 and 28 now.

I always stop and admire the beauty of the Esprit whenever I see one.

I sailed the boat a lot by myself and it never let me down.

Boy, the memories that brings back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this thread is a bit old but I didn't see the point to start a new one for this question.

 

Can Bob (or anybody) give me some contrasts of the Valiant 40 and the 37?

 

Why is there such a HUGE price diff between the two boats?

How usable is the forward head when at sea?

What is the BIGGEST difference besides just the size issue?

 

I love the Valiant 40's but the purchase/departure budget will make it take longer for us to leave, and we will not delay long enough to budget for the 40'. Again, why is the 40 SO MUCH more $$$?

 

My wife and I are making our shortlist for a liveaboard. We plan on working somewhere for a year or so while we do long weekend trips in the local area. And then taking anywhere from 3-9 months to cruise to the next job location. A typical live aboard would be to heavy/slow (esp if we have to go upwind). I prefer a cutter rig, modified keel. although we will consider sloop/fin also. We may need to head upwind to keep to a schedule/ make the next job location and not always stick to the standard cruiser route/season. so NO ketches and likely NO full keels.

 

We are quite minimalist, even by sailor standards. For instance, we spent a significant amount of time aboard a Freedom 30 (The biggest 30' accommodations I have ever seen - Quarter Stateroom bunk is 5'4" wide)we found it GREAT for extended cruises, but would be just a bit small for us to live on.

 

I REALLY like the F38 (mull also) it has GREAT accommodations, but that HUGE main can be a pain getting up and down when we plan on double handing almost all the time.

 

and plus a Perry boat would give us an excuse to bring the boat home someday to make the Perry rendevouz (we live in HK now, but are PNW natives, not planning on living back there for a WHILE though)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reflections - sign on to SA and send me a PM!

Edit: Just saw the date on this thread. In any event S/V Reflections is back again in the South Pacific and the boat and crew doing just fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Baldy:

I don't recall any of the Esprits being built wirth Hetron resin. Mine was not and mine was the first. So while they may have some osmotic blistering, like most grp boats, they will not suffer from the "skin cancer" blisters of the Uniflyte (Tollycraft never built an Esprit) built Valiants.

 

And, if you want to come to the Perry rendezvous in a Mull design that's just fine with me. Gary and I were pals. You can rent a strap-on canoe stern.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can rent a strap-on canoe stern.

 

damn Bob, you're good at this shit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely some fire-retardant resin out there on some of the 37s... from a listing on Yachtword:

 

xyz is a Uniflite boat, and was built with fire retardant resin which was discovered caused blisters

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the full story with that resin. It wasn't on earlier Valiants. I'm sure someone knows which years they were.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Irie:

I think you are correct.I was wrong. Uniflyte did build some of the later Esprits so I suspect they used the Hetron resin. If the boat has a molded in Treadmaster style non skid then it is a Uniflyte boat. The Nordic Esprits had the glued down Vetus non skid panels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this thread is a bit old but I didn't see the point to start a new one for this question.

 

Can Bob (or anybody) give me some contrasts of the Valiant 40 and the 37?

 

Why is there such a HUGE price diff between the two boats?

How usable is the forward head when at sea?

What is the BIGGEST difference besides just the size issue?

 

I love the Valiant 40's but the purchase/departure budget will make it take longer for us to leave, and we will not delay long enough to budget for the 40'. Again, why is the 40 SO MUCH more $$?

 

My wife and I are making our shortlist for a liveaboard. We plan on working somewhere for a year or so while we do long weekend trips in the local area. And then taking anywhere from 3-9 months to cruise to the next job location. A typical live aboard would be to heavy/slow (esp if we have to go upwind). I prefer a cutter rig, modified keel. although we will consider sloop/fin also. We may need to head upwind to keep to a schedule/ make the next job location and not always stick to the standard cruiser route/season. so NO ketches and likely NO full keels.

 

We are quite minimalist, even by sailor standards. For instance, we spent a significant amount of time aboard a Freedom 30 (The biggest 30' accommodations I have ever seen - Quarter Stateroom bunk is 5'4" wide)we found it GREAT for extended cruises, but would be just a bit small for us to live on.

 

I REALLY like the F38 (mull also) it has GREAT accommodations, but that HUGE main can be a pain getting up and down when we plan on double handing almost all the time.

 

and plus a Perry boat would give us an excuse to bring the boat home someday to make the Perry rendevouz (we live in HK now, but are PNW natives, not planning on living back there for a WHILE though)

 

Since everyone else has ignored your question Baldy, I have a go.

 

The price differential between the V40 and the E37 is due to them being two very different boats. While only nominally 3' longer the V40 is about 1 1/2 times the boat in volume, load carrying capacity, tankage etc.

 

Basically it is a MUCH bigger boat. Going long term cruising in each would be like chaulk and cheese comparatively.

 

Displacement = Dollars.

 

Also I think you will find most V40's would come with more gear than an E37.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Baldy:

Normally I try to confine in depth comments for perspective buyers to my consultation service. I like to get paid for my advice. But just went to Spike's Facebook page and said good morning to him so I am in a good moo.

 

I owned both an Esprit 37, RICKY NELSON and a Valiant 40 (with a partner) SEAHAWK. The Valiant 40 is easier to sail as it tracks better de to it's length and is the stiffer boat. The 40 is also much faster off the wind and as Paps said is far more roomier due to its size. It also has a bigger cockpit.

 

The Esprit is just as fast upwind as the V40 in light to moderate air but the 40 has the advantage in a blow. The Esprit cockpit is a bit on the small side and I never could find a really comfortable place to sprawl and read.

The layout of the Esprit is basic and works extremely well. I liked that layout. Very comfortable for cruising alone.

 

The Esprit is just a far better looking boat in my eye. I'd climb into the Avon on a chilly, very quiet morning and slowly and slwly row around the Esprit and I really dont think I ever found an angle where the boat did not look great. Of course I am tremendously biased.

 

If I desgined the Esprit today I would move he mast forward 16" to make the boat easier, more forgiving, to balance. I'd also give it more draft. I'd also give it a double spreader rig. I'd also make it 40' long so it could have a better cockpit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites