• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Buckie Lugger

Pindar Open 60

51 posts in this topic

The hull of the new Pindar Open 60 has been flipped, and a press release is now circulating with pictures. It's up on the Daily Sail, and also on Sail World:

 

http://www.sail-world.com/NZ/index.cfm?nid=34203

 

My thoughts: Chines, the beam is carried fairly far forward, and she's pretty wide. The cockpit is relatively unsheltered, compared with the Farr and Finot designs.

 

Now details on the rig (yet), but the initial renderings showed a wing mast with tuna poles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm.....I like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

standby for something new for the rig..................................think what makes the ORMA's go fast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
standby for something new for the rig..................................think what makes the ORMA's go fast.

 

Well,

so let's see... Ormas have a rotating and canting wing-mast and a square-head main.

 

All Imocas have a square-head main, a good number of them have a rotating wing-mast.

 

That leaves the canting aspect which is not possible.

"C.2: CANTING MAST IN A LATERAL PLANE

Masts that cant in a lateral plane are forbidden".

 

does not leave much room to innovate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be a wing mast with a very large chord. The ORMAs are more extreme in that regard.

 

And I've heard rumoursof the boat having a huge sailplan and rig. Someone suggested that you'd need to be the size of a T-Rex to handle it. :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:blink:

And I've heard rumoursof the boat having a huge sailplan and rig. Someone suggested that you'd need to be the size of a T-Rex to handle it. :ph34r:

Which Mike obviously doesn't have. Let's see what comes that way, we'll have some fun with that boat, I guess, and so did the IMOCA. I don't have any news about that, though, so I still don't know what they were arguing about concerning the boat. Anyone got any clearer idea on that by now?

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:blink:

Which Mike obviously doesn't have. Let's see what comes that way, we'll have some fun with that boat, I guess, and so did the IMOCA. I don't have any news about that, though, so I still don't know what they were arguing about concerning the boat. Anyone got any clearer idea on that by now?

 

Cheers

I hear the query was asymmetry. The rule allows static heel up to 20 degrees, but doesn't say 10 degrees each way, so you could go 8 degrees on one tack and 12 on the other.

 

Not sure what Buckie is on about the volume being carried a long way forwards, he obviously hasn't seen the latest from Finot!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The new Finot seems to have a similar shape to Pindar. (Just been looking at the photos on the Daily Sail.) Big chines on the Finot design...

 

I think that I misinterpreted the shape of Pindar, though. The photos were taken with a wide lens, which distorted the perspective a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
oh, she's wide alright.

 

7m is the best rumour I've heard ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The new Finot seems to have a similar shape to Pindar. (Just been looking at the photos on the Daily Sail.) Big chines on the Finot design...

 

I think that I misinterpreted the shape of Pindar, though. The photos were taken with a wide lens, which distorted the perspective a bit.

What is hard to see on the Daily Sail is just how much volume there is forwards on the Finots. Looking up close they almost look like the front ten feet was chopped off! Pindar looks to me like a nice powerful shape, not too distorted by rule requirements by comparison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get to see the boats in Calais, Chimp? I'd liked to have gone, but moved down to Gibraltar a couple of weeks back, making it a bit impractical to get up there. :(

 

Looking at the size of the coach roof on Pindar, I could believe that she's 7 metres wide.

 

The rumours are that the new boats are generally 6 to 6.5 metres wide, compared to around 5.5 for the previous generation. There's a photo on the Calais Round Britain Race website that shows Cheminees Poujoulat and Delta Dore, and you can really see the difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did you get to see the boats in Calais, Chimp? I'd liked to have gone, but moved down to Gibraltar a couple of weeks back, making it a bit impractical to get up there. :(

 

Looking at the size of the coach roof on Pindar, I could believe that she's 7 metres wide.

 

The rumours are that the new boats are generally 6 to 6.5 metres wide, compared to around 5.5 for the previous generation. There's a photo on the Calais Round Britain Race website that shows Cheminees Poujoulat and Delta Dore, and you can really see the difference.

Didn't get to see them in Calais, but to tell you where woudl be too much of a clue as to my true identity!

 

Not sure on the beam, but I am really surprised by the size of Pindar's coachroof. If that is all there is along with the moderate deck camber I wonder how the roll over will go, unless the keel cants a hell of a long way or is pretty heavy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You and your secret identity... :lol:

 

I'm surprised by the size of the coach roof too. If you compare the footage of the Temenos 2 (small roof) and Delta Dore (big roof) roll-over tests, Delta Dore comes over far, far easier than Temenos.

 

I'd guess that the keel's going to be capable of being canted pretty heavily. Pindar looks a similar sort of size and shape to the new Finot designs, and apparently the new Hugo Boss can cant her keel to 48 degrees. So I'd expect Pindar to have a similar angle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You and your secret identity... :lol:

 

I'm surprised by the size of the coach roof too. If you compare the footage of the Temenos 2 (small roof) and Delta Dore (big roof) roll-over tests, Delta Dore comes over far, far easier than Temenos.

 

I'd guess that the keel's going to be capable of being canted pretty heavily. Pindar looks a similar sort of size and shape to the new Finot designs, and apparently the new Hugo Boss can cant her keel to 48 degrees. So I'd expect Pindar to have a similar angle.

 

With that amount of cant you don't need much help to roll back!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So ........we already guessed Pindar's skipper would have to be a gorilla, with a coachroof that tiny he now needs to be amphibious .

 

What kind of a dinausorus is that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CHIMP can do it, big laugh...

 

funny to see people hiding behind the handles Moody frog and Buckie Lugger trying to work out who is Chimp.

I do it too (as you know) but at least LeoV is easy to find out :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some more speculation...

 

There's an article on Yachting World's website about the new 38' canting keel boats that Juan K has designed for Team Heiner:

 

http://www.yachtingworld.com/yw/blog/20070...avid_glenn.html

 

And it contains this comment about their design:

 

The TH38 is a wonderfully potent looking machine, comes with the familiar Juan K chined hull, a canting bulbed keel and also a canting canard forward of the keel which can be trimmed to the vertical no matter what the angle of keel.

The IMOCA rules state:

 

Symmetrical daggerboards can be moveable on two axes.

There's no visible holes for twin boards in the photos I linked to, so what if Pindar is going to have a single, lifting and canting daggerboard?

 

The prime driver for Open 60s is the 10 degree rule, and having a single, central board helps the weight distribution for meeting that. So what if there's a loophole here that Juan K has spotted...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Some more speculation...

 

There's an article on Yachting World's website about the new 38' canting keel boats that Juan K has designed for Team Heiner:

 

http://www.yachtingworld.com/yw/blog/20070...avid_glenn.html

 

And it contains this comment about their design:

The IMOCA rules state:

There's no visible holes for twin boards in the photos I linked to, so what if Pindar is going to have a single, lifting and canting daggerboard?

 

The prime driver for Open 60s is the 10 degree rule, and having a single, central board helps the weight distribution for meeting that. So what if there's a loophole here that Juan K has spotted...

 

Not sure this will help a great deal for measurement, since the daggerboards are raised for this. Gets the VCG down a little, since there is only one 100kg board rather than 2, but not a huge difference. I know Juan likes this approach though from previous discussions with him.

 

Don't think it is a loophole others haven't looked into before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some minis had/have them, specially the Rogers comes to mind....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice how they didn't have any pics of the rear or underside of the hull...

What's up with, "We have just finished the fairing of the hull"? What no female mold? Slackness.

From the Seahorse article last year Juan showed a pretty big sailplan with a rotating mast on a deck spreader setup. if Mike has any input it should have some interesting sails as that is his thing. I have to check the article to see what he said about foils. A canting single foil would actually be kinda hot and might orient you toward a much different hull shape in the forward sections to get it to work...

 

Mike S isn't tall but he is not skinny. i wouldn't want to get into a grinding duel with him and i got six inches on him at least. Given the trend these boats are taking it's likely your next generation of offshore singlehander is going to look more like an AC grinder than an AC tactician.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike Sanderson said that it isn't as important to get all the weight into the keel for an Open 60 as it would be for a VOR boat, so the cost of female tooling wasn't justified. Hence the male mould.

 

There's been quite a lot of secrecy about this project so far, so I can understand that they don't want to give away too much yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the old PRB, now Roxy has a single canting, lifting daggerboard so it is nothing new

 

Alex.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, it's a gybing, rather than canting, daggerboard on Roxy, similar to the forward foil on a CBTF boat, but with a smaller angle on rotation. A canting board would match the movement of the keel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct, gybing daggerboard, but not rotating -angled all the way either side-.

 

And... Buckie, I believe the canting board would cant opposite to the keel, to remain perpendicular to the water-surface or slightly angled to leeward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do these boats feel like to helm? The tillers look industrial strength and I wonder how the helm is. Very much pull?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do these boats feel like to helm? The tillers look industrial strength and I wonder how the helm is. Very much pull?

 

As easy and balanced as you can dream of. :)

 

It's a very important design factor to make the autopilots life easy as they need to last a RTW and one can carry limited spares only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Notice how they didn't have any pics of the rear or underside of the hull...

What's up with, "We have just finished the fairing of the hull"? What no female mold? Slackness.

 

Male molds that are built well are not a huge difference to a female mold, the cost that you save can be better used for the rest of the boat, using pre-preg you can get a very good outer surface, sometimes its just a extra coat of primer. A good boatbuilder can probably make a male molded boat nicer than a average builder with a female mold. I know what id rather spend the hundreds of thousands on!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Olivier Luthi, a very good Swiss builder, likes to use male moulds for narrower boats as he can get a better quality of lay-up. (Easier to pack the material around tighter curves.)

 

I don' think that female moulds are always better...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Male molds that are built well are not a huge difference to a female mold, the cost that you save can be better used for the rest of the boat, using pre-preg you can get a very good outer surface, sometimes its just a extra coat of primer. A good boatbuilder can probably make a male molded boat nicer than a average builder with a female mold. I know what id rather spend the hundreds of thousands on!!!

 

Finally. Someone talking sence here!! :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What is hard to see on the Daily Sail is just how much volume there is forwards on the Finots. Looking up close they almost look like the front ten feet was chopped off! Pindar looks to me like a nice powerful shape, not too distorted by rule requirements by comparison.

 

This might help answer your question.

From the new "Brit'Air" Website

post-6361-1181393921_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that's a REALLY small dog house for what's been coming out of the sheds recently...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here we go !

 

First shots of launching on

 

Crew Org NZ Website

 

By Open 60 standards I think that is a good looking boat, almost looks like it was drawn without restrictions!! Never thought I would say that about one of Juan's boats, and never going to admit it to him!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good thing you've got that secret identity, Chimp, or Juan would be surprised to hear you praising him. :)

 

Pindar strikes me as being a less radical looking boat than some of the Farr designs, and particularly Hugo Boss. I get the impression that Mike Sanderson keeps Juan K in line, and stops him going off on too many tangents.

 

The hull looks similar to the ABN Amro boats, and from early shots of the deck (none here), she looks very exposed. The traveller looks like it's located on the cockpit sole, which is unusual for a 60, but saves a bit of weight.

 

I had hoped to see some interesting innovations, but it looks like an evolutionary, rather than revolutionary, boat. She looks very wide, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good thing you've got that secret identity, Chimp, or Juan would be surprised to hear you praising him. :)

 

Pindar strikes me as being a less radical looking boat than some of the Farr designs, and particularly Hugo Boss. I get the impression that Mike Sanderson keeps Juan K in line, and stops him going off on too many tangents.

 

The hull looks similar to the ABN Amro boats, and from early shots of the deck (none here), she looks very exposed. The traveller looks like it's located on the cockpit sole, which is unusual for a 60, but saves a bit of weight.

 

I had hoped to see some interesting innovations, but it looks like an evolutionary, rather than revolutionary, boat. She looks very wide, though.

The appendages look like he has just scaled down ABNs package a bit and pressed the go button. He is obviously pretty happy with his approach and sees no need to change for the sake of it.

 

It does look wide, but is clearly from the same drawing board as both ABN and the new Bounder. Strane to see Juan's boats looking less radical than what we are seeing from FYD. Maybe FYD feel the need to be "Radical!!" whilst Juan is happy to just be "Juan" these days!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also possibly strongly biased by Mike S.

 

Remember the drastic mods conducted by Moose on the Pindar O/C, rig change, non roller furling headsails........

 

He has made clear that he had no interest in the Vendee and is targetting the transats.

Could be that he requested a 60' Volvo to kill the Vendée optimised boats upwind - different set of targetted polars -

His options worked very very well in the last The Transat so why not go one step further?

 

Might be why no one seems to be willing to build a sistership.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or did he messed up the drawings from Ericson and Pindar and will we see an extreme wide VOR

Damn his mail room...

 

even looks like the deck beam is smaller in the back much more then the other 60´s (damn what a sentence i did make here... to tired)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so what is the FINAL word on beam and displacment?

Wow you're late to the party!!! I remember for last vendee it was alot heavier than the other boats, upwards of ten tons if memory serves

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so what is the FINAL word on beam and displacment?

so what is the FINAL word on beam and displacment?

 

post-6214-0-07260900-1352830151_thumb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

attachment=184755:golden shovel trophy.png

 

Damn I want that on my profile!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

attachment=184755:golden shovel trophy.png

 

Damn I want that on my profile!

attachment=184755:golden shovel trophy.png

 

Damn I want that on my profile!

 

be my guest :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Buckie Lugger. There's a name from the past. Wonder what happened to him?

I'm occassionally around, and have dropped in once or twice with the Vendee.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Buckie Lugger. There's a name from the past. Wonder what happened to him?

I'm occassionally around, and have dropped in once or twice with the Vendee.

 

Welcome back

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Buckie Lugger. There's a name from the past. Wonder what happened to him?

I'm occassionally around, and have dropped in once or twice with the Vendee.

Even submarines need to come up for air sometimes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

attachment=184755:golden shovel trophy.png

 

Damn I want that on my profile!

attachment=184755:golden shovel trophy.png

 

Damn I want that on my profile!

 

be my guest :P

finally got round to it lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

attachment=184755:golden shovel trophy.png

 

Damn I want that on my profile!

attachment=184755:golden shovel trophy.png

 

Damn I want that on my profile!

 

be my guest :P

finally got round to it lol

 

congrats!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites