• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Hastings

Keep A Close Watch on The Big Cheese

3,257 posts in this topic

Let us assume there is merit in the Albany news from Joceito and subsequent analysis by Comrade Stingray, the Master of Intelligence.

 

Place this against the backdrop of Ernesto's oft-repeated claim a BOR victory in Albany automatically leads to a DOG-Fight.

 

I do not believe Ernesto when he speaks like this.

 

But, for the sake of this thread, assume he sometimes speaks the truth.

 

If so, the DOG-Fight moved closer today.

 

Which means both sides have to start paying close attention to their respective DOG-Monsters.

 

BOR Dogzilla is off to the shed for surgery.

 

But what about the Big Cheese?

 

We now need another round of spy shots.

 

Could our Swiss members again swing into action?

 

Even a crowded parking lot would suggest the forces of darknesses are getting their cheeses in a row?

 

Or will they wait for the official verdict?

 

What do you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let us assume there is merit in the Albany news from Joceito and subsequent analysis by Comrade Stingray, the Master of Intelligence.

 

Place this against the backdrop of Ernesto's oft-repeated claim a BOR victory in Albany automatically leads to a DOG-Fight.

 

I do not believe Ernesto when he speaks like this.

 

But, for the sake of this thread, assume he sometimes speaks the truth.

 

If so, the DOG-Fight moved closer today.

 

Which means both sides have to start paying close attention to their respective DOG-Monsters.

 

BOR Dogzilla is off to the shed for surgery.

 

But what about the Big Cheese?

 

We now need another round of spy shots.

 

Could our Swiss members again swing into action?

 

Even a crowded parking lot would suggest the forces of darknesses are getting their cheeses in a row?

 

Or will they wait for the official verdict?

 

What do you think?

I am so keen to know what the hell is going in in Villeneuve that I have emailed several companies close by asking for fresh shots of the Decision and Alinghi facilities. Nobody will respond, lol, even the friendly Scuba Shop up the street.

 

I've watched head cams on sky divers, foot cams on paragliders, Red Bull Vertigo film, seen photos by hikers that overlook the town, feel like I've been there a thousand times. But the industrial area those facilities are in are not the scenic and photogenic parts of Villeneuve that most people capture. It's a beautiful town in a beautiful area, I encourage someone to stop by and click some of the manufacturing too :)

 

Anacortes is a special place in it's own way, they have nice marinas, good boat builders, excellent sailing waters, great scenery of islands and mountains too. But Villeneuve really is a gem. The industrial zone that probably houses AZ's monster parts includes a good variety of healthy businesses, many of them high-tech fabrication companies, it's as if owners in the trendier Montreux have their businesses located in Villeneuve (which means "new town" - despite it dating to back to a Roman settlement and probably beyond) and despite the slopes being mostly north-facing the vineyards produce well respected grapes. But even if it's not it's not Montreux or Vevey, it's still not cheap. There's a lot of money, rents and prices on apartments, houses and buildings are high.

 

I've been through Lugano a couple times but never over the Alps to the "Swiss Riviera" on Lake Leman. After reading about it I want to. Definitely a cool place and I expect we'll be learning a lot more about it soon.

 

For now,

Could our Swiss members again swing into action?

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Ernie knows Albany is set to rule for BOR, and there is no action in Villeneuve, it suggests there will be no DOG-Fight.

Deep down, does EB know the next AC is a multi-challenge show?

 

In the meantime, spy shots please!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If Ernie knows Albany is set to rule for BOR, and there is no action in Villeneuve, it suggests there will be no DOG-Fight.

Deep down, does EB know the next AC is a multi-challenge show?

 

In the meantime, spy shots please!

 

Not necessarily - it just means he'll try to buy more time by suing for the CHR the following day. That will take six months, at least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let us assume there is merit in the Albany news from Joceito and subsequent analysis by Comrade Stingray, the Master of Intelligence.

 

Place this against the backdrop of Ernesto's oft-repeated claim a BOR victory in Albany automatically leads to a DOG-Fight.

 

I do not believe Ernesto when he speaks like this.

 

But, for the sake of this thread, assume he sometimes speaks the truth.

 

If so, the DOG-Fight moved closer today.

 

Which means both sides have to start paying close attention to their respective DOG-Monsters.

 

BOR Dogzilla is off to the shed for surgery.

 

But what about the Big Cheese?

 

We now need another round of spy shots.

 

Could our Swiss members again swing into action?

 

Even a crowded parking lot would suggest the forces of darknesses are getting their cheeses in a row?

 

Or will they wait for the official verdict?

 

What do you think?

I am so keen to know what the hell is going in in Villeneuve that I have emailed several companies close by asking for fresh shots of the Decision and Alinghi facilities. Nobody will respond, lol, even the friendly Scuba Shop up the street.

 

I've watched head cams on sky divers, foot cams on paragliders, Red Bull Vertigo film, seen photos by hikers that overlook the town, feel like I've been there a thousand times. But the industrial area those facilities are in are not the scenic and photogenic parts of Villeneuve that most people capture. It's a beautiful town in a beautiful area, I encourage someone to stop by and click some of the manufacturing too :)

 

Anacortes is a special place in it's own way, they have nice marinas, good boat builders, excellent sailing waters, great scenery of islands and mountains too. But Villeneuve really is a gem. The industrial zone that probably houses AZ's monster parts includes a good variety of healthy businesses, many of them high-tech fabrication companies, it's as if owners in the trendier Montreux have their businesses located in Villeneuve (which means "new town" - despite it dating to back to a Roman settlement and probably beyond) and despite the slopes being mostly north-facing the vineyards produce well respected grapes. But even if it's not it's not Montreux or Vevey, it's still not cheap. There's a lot of money, rents and prices on apartments, houses and buildings are high.

 

I've been through Lugano a couple times but never over the Alps to the "Swiss Riviera" on Lake Leman. After reading about it I want to. Definitely a cool place and I expect we'll be learning a lot more about it soon.

 

For now,

Could our Swiss members again swing into action?

+1

 

 

I've got the time to go over there if we can take a collection to get me there, and maybe some bail money just in case EB has some goons keeping guard over things..............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've got the time to go over there if we can take a collection to get me there, and maybe some bail money just in case EB has some goons keeping guard over things..............

 

How much for a flight from your place (Tampa?) to Geneva?

 

Add the cost of a few trains and 4 nights in a backpackers and bob's your uncle.

 

Do you have a camera? And a map?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've got the time to go over there if we can take a collection to get me there, and maybe some bail money just in case EB has some goons keeping guard over things..............

 

How much for a flight from your place (Tampa?) to Geneva?

 

Add the cost of a few trains and 4 nights in a backpackers and bob's your uncle.

 

Do you have a camera? And a map?

 

 

I'll have them before I leave........................

 

Maybe some funds from the SAAC account would cover it, since espionage is a part of any real AC challenge! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've got the time to go over there if we can take a collection to get me there, and maybe some bail money just in case EB has some goons keeping guard over things..............

 

How much for a flight from your place (Tampa?) to Geneva?

 

Add the cost of a few trains and 4 nights in a backpackers and bob's your uncle.

 

Do you have a camera? And a map?

 

 

I'll have them before I leave........................

 

Maybe some funds from the SAAC account would cover it, since espionage is a part of any real AC challenge! ;)

 

Did you check out the cost of a flight yet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've got the time to go over there if we can take a collection to get me there, and maybe some bail money just in case EB has some goons keeping guard over things..............

 

How much for a flight from your place (Tampa?) to Geneva?

 

Add the cost of a few trains and 4 nights in a backpackers and bob's your uncle.

 

Do you have a camera? And a map?

 

 

I'll have them before I leave........................

 

Maybe some funds from the SAAC account would cover it, since espionage is a part of any real AC challenge! ;)

 

Did you check out the cost of a flight yet?

 

Expedia says anywhere from $1050 to $2500 for round trip, hotel, and economy car to Geneva from Tampa.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Expedia says anywhere from $1050 to $2500 for round trip, hotel, and economy car to Geneva from Tampa.

Wow - I bet it could be done for around $500 from Seattle at this time of the year. Expedia must be giving you the full-meal-deal..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've got the time to go over there if we can take a collection to get me there, and maybe some bail money just in case EB has some goons keeping guard over things..............

 

How much for a flight from your place (Tampa?) to Geneva?

 

Add the cost of a few trains and 4 nights in a backpackers and bob's your uncle.

 

Do you have a camera? And a map?

 

 

I'll have them before I leave........................

 

Maybe some funds from the SAAC account would cover it, since espionage is a part of any real AC challenge! ;)

 

Did you check out the cost of a flight yet?

 

Expedia says anywhere from $1050 to $2500 for round trip, hotel, and economy car to Geneva from Tampa.

 

As clean already proposed using challenge funds to sponser his key west trip, I'm sure the guys who sent in their money to support an SA entry into the AC would have no problem with sending you on a jolly to the land of toblerone to check on a boat that may never be splashed, as it's a pretty expensive place you had better get a good per diem deal done before you go.

What happened to the Ed getting around to giving us details on the sa challenge funding? ..too busy getting the trash and trinket deals done?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've got the time to go over there if we can take a collection to get me there, and maybe some bail money just in case EB has some goons keeping guard over things..............

 

How much for a flight from your place (Tampa?) to Geneva?

 

Add the cost of a few trains and 4 nights in a backpackers and bob's your uncle.

 

Do you have a camera? And a map?

 

 

I'll have them before I leave........................

 

Maybe some funds from the SAAC account would cover it, since espionage is a part of any real AC challenge! ;)

 

Did you check out the cost of a flight yet?

 

Expedia says anywhere from $1050 to $2500 for round trip, hotel, and economy car to Geneva from Tampa.

 

As clean already proposed using challenge funds to sponser his key west trip, I'm sure the guys who sent in their money to support an SA entry into the AC would have no problem with sending you on a jolly to the land of toblerone to check on a boat that may never be splashed, as it's a pretty expensive place you had better get a good per diem deal done before you go.

Speaking for myself, I want my little donation to stay Anarchy Challenge focussed for now. But if HHN can figure out something economical then I'll happily contribute a little to that good cause too. It would be a riot even if he can't find anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We might have to send Fuzz or WL from Seattle .....

 

They both know what is required

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've got the time to go over there if we can take a collection to get me there, and maybe some bail money just in case EB has some goons keeping guard over things..............

 

How much for a flight from your place (Tampa?) to Geneva?

 

Add the cost of a few trains and 4 nights in a backpackers and bob's your uncle.

 

Do you have a camera? And a map?

 

 

I'll have them before I leave........................

 

Maybe some funds from the SAAC account would cover it, since espionage is a part of any real AC challenge! ;)

 

Did you check out the cost of a flight yet?

 

Expedia says anywhere from $1050 to $2500 for round trip, hotel, and economy car to Geneva from Tampa.

 

As clean already proposed using challenge funds to sponser his key west trip, I'm sure the guys who sent in their money to support an SA entry into the AC would have no problem with sending you on a jolly to the land of toblerone to check on a boat that may never be splashed, as it's a pretty expensive place you had better get a good per diem deal done before you go.

Speaking for myself, I want my little donation to stay Anarchy Challenge focussed for now. But if HHN can figure out something economical then I'll happily contribute a little to that good cause too. It would be a riot even if he can't find anything.

 

 

 

That was a first pass at it, just threw it in after you guys asked. I can research further if this is halfway serious.

 

I'm sure a NC/FL redneck going around asking these Swiss people where 'CheeseZilla' is would raise and eybrow or two................

 

"Hey feller, can you direct me to the CheeseZilla boat? What? No speaky Engy?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We might have to send Fuzz or WL from Seattle .....

 

They both know what is required

 

I suck at reconnaissance.

 

No doubt Maguah has some lawyer friends heading over there (UBS), maybe a couple are sailors? Perhaps well versed in detective work and investigations?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We might have to send Fuzz or WL from Seattle .....

 

They both know what is required

 

I suck at reconnaissance.

 

No doubt Maguah has some lawyer friends heading over there (UBS), maybe a couple are sailors? Perhaps well versed in detective work and investigations?

 

 

 

well, there is a UBS office in our little town outside Tampa, maybe I should go ask them about 'CheeseZilla'? :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Achtung Swiss Anarchists !

 

Borrow the camera from aunty and post some spy shots.

 

It is to expensive for us to relaunch Stingray's spy satellite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Achtung Swiss Anarchists !

 

Borrow the camera from aunty and post some spy shots.

 

It is to expensive for us to relaunch Stingray's spy satellite.

kerrist Hastings, don't wet your pants on this ... yet ... ain't nothing to see overthere... yet

 

hey HHN , when you take the "and economy car to Geneva from Tampa." option, don't forget to go Google and let those funny people tell you where you have to drive off the dock in NY and where in London or so you'll surface ;) (and add in another charge of those $$$$-lusting Swiss, from the moment you dare to cross their border they will charge you for the use of their highways, whether you use them or not is not even a concern to them... maybe evil Ernie has a deal with them huh ? :lol: )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hastings, ... ain't nothing to see over there... yet

 

 

Alright !

 

Could you elaborate please?

 

There is nothing to see !

 

Why?

 

Or why not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hastings, ... ain't nothing to see over there... yet

Alright ! Could you elaborate please? There is nothing to see ! Why? Or why not?

It has never made any sense to me that Alinghi would "make all of the parts" but hold off on assembling them. If they really are going to build a Cheezilla, my guess is they could have made the molds but haven't started any fabrication yet. If you are using a company that makes carbon fiber airplane parts, one would guess they could ramp up and produce very quickly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hastings, ... ain't nothing to see over there... yet

Alright ! Could you elaborate please? There is nothing to see ! Why? Or why not?

It has never made any sense to me that Alinghi would "make all of the parts" but hold off on assembling them. If they really are going to build a Cheezilla, my guess is they could have made the molds but haven't started any fabrication yet. If you are using a company that makes carbon fiber airplane parts, one would guess they could ramp up and produce very quickly.

Yes, it could be that it's only the molds they have built so far.

 

And as a reminder, the company that produced those Solar Impulse parts was Decision SA, same as who built large pieces in Vevey before closing that facility. In the Solar Impulse case, they were built in Villeneuve, in space leased from Miauton, in a facility Miauton purchased last year from Bombardier. They also have a smaller facility, next to an Alinghi one, in Vill. And there ~may well~ be a new "VAB"-like tent standing somewhere close by, housing either the molds or the completed parts.

 

Farther off track... I mentioned an obtuse reference that was made by an Alinghi designer that got me to speculating about multiple masts. I can't find that reference (am missing SH issue 342, it could have been in there) but what did trigger my imagination was probably a photo on page 31 of issue 341, in an interview with Nigel Irens, under "Classic Irens: ...Clifton Flasher, which set a new Class C world speed record in 1974"

 

This is not that same photo, but it's equally, umm, quaint. From here

 

post-17804-1236626627_thumb.jpg

 

Again, the rumored use of powered systems is what reminded me of that.

 

Btw, Irens dismisses the notion of any sold wing of Zilla-sized proportions in the same issue 341 article.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hastings, ... ain't nothing to see over there... yet

Alright ! Could you elaborate please? There is nothing to see ! Why? Or why not?

It has never made any sense to me that Alinghi would "make all of the parts" but hold off on assembling them. If they really are going to build a Cheezilla, my guess is they could have made the molds but haven't started any fabrication yet. If you are using a company that makes carbon fiber airplane parts, one would guess they could ramp up and produce very quickly.

Very quickly may be an issue. Last published estimates for the time and people involved to construct a large multi is that you need anything between 30,000 (BOR90 (?)) man-hours and 80,000 (BP V) man-hours to get it done right. Not so easy to compress that sort of build program into a very short time-frame, even if the moulds are done already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is not that same photo, but it's equally, umm, quaint. From here

 

Btw, Irens dismisses the notion of any sold wing of Zilla-sized proportions in the same issue 341 article.

On a remotely similar subject, I can't tell the date but there's a tantalizing glimpse of the solid wing US-1 S&S at the very end of this video. It's on Lake Avandaro, near the town of Valle Bravo, about 145 km (90 miles) SW of Mexico City, in a region that some call the 'Mexican Alps.'

 

http://www.onlineadventure.com/videos/Valle-de-Bravo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This photo is from late 2003, on that same lake. I found it in the SA Multihull forum and followed up on it for some details.

 

post-17804-1236628794_thumb.jpg

 

Don't know the date on this one but it is also from on Lake Andaro:

 

post-17804-1236628882_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This photo is from late 2003, on that same lake. I found it in the SA Multihull forum and followed up on it for some details.

 

post-17804-1236628794_thumb.jpg

 

Don't know the date on this one but it is also from on Lake Andaro:

 

post-17804-1236628882_thumb.jpg

Great Pictures, thanks for digging them up SR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Great Pictures, thanks for digging them up SR.

Glad you like them too.

 

The boat may be destroyed beyond repair if the rumors are true. But I'd like to track her down to find out for sure. There's a remote chance that she is in some state of disrepair but still possible to salvage. I mean think about it: If you had the very boat that DC successfully defended the America's Cup with, would you have it deliberately and completely scrapped? If it sank in deep water, then maybe.. If the rig just blew apart in a hurricane, or more likely just took ~some~ damage to the soft parts, then as a presumably well-heeled owner you may just set it aside for a possible repair some day in the future. She looked pretty great as recently as 2003, I do think there's some chance of it.

 

The value in tracking it down, repairing it, then renting or buying it, and then transporting it, would need to be offset by the value in doing so. And if this DoG Match suddenly got a lot more likely with Jocecito's 'announcement' then, well, what better time for her to shine again?

 

If we could paint a big red A on her and 'Challenge' DZ to a 'Match' on a DoG sized course then you never know. Networks like ABC or CBS could really take an interest. For one, it provides a way to put things in historical perspective. For another, it paves the way for all kinds of personalities, stories and archived material to get mixed in with an interesting and current context. And the fact her soft-sailed sister is still active proves she's a fast design even by today's standards.

 

I know it sounds far-fetched, especially money wise. But we don't actually know that for a fact. It would be good to find out, or else it's a missed opportunity.

 

Here's a short archival video, sponsored ironically by Mahguah's new-found friend - UBS:

Historical Videos: The Mismatch, Dennis Conner, IACC

 

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been posted before but here is a reminder, from Where Are They Now?

--

 

1988 - Stars & Stripes US-1 Catamaran

 

“The boats are going to be very big, very radical, and very controversial. The contest will not be a sailboat race. It will be a design lottery in which the sailors will have little or nothing to do with the outcome. In one word, the 1988 America’s Cup challenge will be bizarre.”

 

That was the assessment of Dennis Conner as published in an interview for the Australian review The Bulletin on December 15th, 1987. The facts would prove Conner right and the unsurprising victory of his small 18.30-metre LOA catamaran, Stars & Stripes, against the huge 27.43-metre LOA monohull New Zealand would remain forever the most incongruous America’s Cup.

 

The long silence of the San Diego Yacht Club following Dennis Conner's victory with the 12-metre Stars & Stripes on February 4th, 1987 in Fremantle is often cited as the reason behind the 1988 America’s Cup. Taking literally the words of the Deed of Gift, the New Zealand banker Michael Fay, impatient with American foot-dragging, sent a challenge contrary to all expectations on July 15th, 1987.

 

His challenger would be a 90-foot monohull, pushing aside the 12-metre class that had been used in each Cup since 1958. Taken aback, the Americans rejected the challenge but Fay asked to the Supreme Court of the State of New York County to intervene. On November 25th, Justice Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick confirmed the validity of the challenge.

 

With just 10 months to prepare, the Defender decided upon a radical option. John Marshall, the chief of the Sail America Foundation design team, announced on January 22nd, 1988 that the defender would be a catamaran. The Americans had only eight months left to conceive, build and test a defender capable of repelling the assault of Fay's ‘Big Boat’.

 

The American decision was simple on one level, yet at the same time was complex. It was obvious that the multihull choice was likely to be interpreted as a provocation and would generate a new legal conflict. But from a sailing point of view it was simple – the Americans didn’t have the time to catch up in conceiving and constructing a big monohull. Instead, it was easier to opt for a catamaran, which was sure to be faster, more elusive, and with a LOA limited to 60 feet (18.29 metres) it would be able to be built quickly.

 

On April 15th, 1988 (the immense monohull New Zealand had been sailing in the waters off Auckland since March 27th) John Marshall confirmed that two catamarans were in the process of being built. The first one would be fitted with a soft rig, the second with a hard rig. Conceived in record time, Stars and Stripes, the Defender catamaran was a successful marriage merging cutting-edge naval architecture with aeronautics. For this, Marshall co-ordinated a team comprising exceptional people like Gino Morrelli, who since his youth was fascinated by multihulls. He very quickly became one of the best American specialists and accepted without hesitation the challenge of the America’s Cup. With Bruce Nelson, Britton Chance and Bernard Nivelt, he drew up the catamaran. As expected, two 60-foot boats were built, one of them soft-rigged, following Morrelli’s design. The other one was hard-rigged with a winged-mast, a specialty of Dave Hubbard and Duncan MacLane (who had previously worked out this mode of propulsion on 25 feet-catamarans (7.72 metre) belonging to the C-Class, as the famous Patient Lady.

 

To scale up the concept of a mast-wing with articulated flaps from a 25-foot catamaran to a 60-foot machine, Marshall appealed to Burt Rutan's talents, the designer of Voyager, an ultra-light airplane that would make a round the world flight without stopping in 1988. In ten weeks, Rutan, Hubbard and MacLane, supported by a team of 40 people, succeeded in extrapolating the concept. It was an achievement “more difficult than with the airplane wing” Rutan would say later, because of the absolute constraint to save weight.

 

On May 24th, the first boat was launched and in June, Dennis Conner sailed with the hard-rigged cat. The team discovered that in light wind, the traditional soft rigging of the sister ship was more effective. But in more steady, stronger winds, the hard-rigged cat was faster but the risk of material failure was bigger. So Rutan and his team built up a new winged mast and delivered it at the beginning of August. This second structure was 40% bigger and far more solid than the first one. The mast measured 32.61 metres, 5.80 metres more than the first one, and thus the performance was there: the catamaran fitted with the hard rig was preferred to the classic soft-rigged boat.

 

(contd)

 

--

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Meanwhile, on May 5th, 1988, as expected, Michael Fay again asked for justice. He argued that the San Diego YC should defend the America’s Cup in September 1988 but with a 90-foot monohull. He noted the Deed of Gift required a match between “like and similar boats.”

 

Another lawyer experimenting with jedi mind tricks. The Deed of Gift says no such thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From that link,

 

Some months after the race, a Mexican yachtsman, Victor Tapia, acquired the catamaran. Excited by the prospect of watching the 1992 America’s Cup races, Tapia sailed the cat to San Diego. Ten years later, Stars & Stripes was sailing on Valle de Bravo Lake, near Mexico City. The last report we had of it, Stars & Stripes was for sale in Mexico.

 

That's the lake where those shots I posted were taken, back-whenever. edit: The 2003 photos is from during the 49er NA's in March 2003.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alert................Alert...................Alert

 

Larry the Cable Guy is going to be on Hannity @ FNN

 

I know some of you do not go that way, but I like Larry..............since 1992 ;)

 

Sorry.................HiJack over..........................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is great - Got a PM from someone I've learned to trust. With their permission:

 

"Hey, you can take it from me that the boat is fully built. There are no sails as yet and Ernesto doesn't want to launch it unless he has to."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is great - Got a PM from someone I've learned to trust. With their permission:

 

"Hey, you can take it from me that the boat is fully built. There are no sails as yet and Ernesto doesn't want to launch it unless he has to."

 

Should I keep digging for a cheap rate to Geneva then?

 

I was trying to negotiate with Bill Shatner.........................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is great - Got a PM from someone I've learned to trust. With their permission:

 

"Hey, you can take it from me that the boat is fully built. There are no sails as yet and Ernesto doesn't want to launch it unless he has to."

 

Should I keep digging for a cheap rate to Geneva then?

 

I was trying to negotiate with Bill Shatner.........................

No, because he also told me where it is ~not~ and so now I have no idea where it is!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is great - Got a PM from someone I've learned to trust. With their permission:

 

"Hey, you can take it from me that the boat is fully built. There are no sails as yet and Ernesto doesn't want to launch it unless he has to."

 

Should I keep digging for a cheap rate to Geneva then?

 

I was trying to negotiate with Bill Shatner.........................

No, because he also told me where it is ~not~ and so now I have no idea where it is!

 

"OK Bill, forget that deal............I know $250 round trip is a deal but the boat is not there..............I know, I've gotta unpack my bags too, feller...............just hold on, I'll call ya when I know more....................Stingray says his guy says its not there..................well you want me to go stare at an empty warehouse.................WTF Bill...............I know you own stock and your acting career is down the tubes.................well.....call Spock and whine then............."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, because he also told me where it is ~not~ and so now I have no idea where it is!

 

It had better be in Switzerland!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, because he also told me where it is ~not~ and so now I have no idea where it is!

 

Damn the swiss and their secrecy laws. no one has let on anything more about this rumoured 115 ft monster, where does one hide such a beast? Any guesses on where it could be now. And havent they done a good job keeping everyone guessing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, because he also told me where it is ~not~ and so now I have no idea where it is!

 

It had better be in Switzerland!

 

 

No, because he also told me where it is ~not~ and so now I have no idea where it is!

 

Damn the swiss and their secrecy laws. no one has let on anything more about this rumoured 115 ft monster, where does one hide such a beast? Any guesses on where it could be now. And havent they done a good job keeping everyone guessing.

 

Well I don't have permission to repeat more than what I did. But what he said leads me to believe what someone else told me quite recently, that I dismissed. I dismissed it in part because he never responded to a simple followup question, which was "what part of that can I post?"

 

Perhaps I should not have dismissed that info. Like this guy, he has no posts. And apparently he's not planning to answer any more from me anyway, and so I may as well say what ~that~ person said.

 

They said it was "between Villeneuve and Montreux."

 

At the time, I looked for buildings large enough to hold monster hulls but didn't see any. There are just two villages between Villeneuve and Montreux - Veytaux and Grandchamps. The only likelihood it is close to the lake is if they were to assemble and launch it on the lake. If they did "bond" it then I don;t effing know how they could get it to, say, the Med. But everything is quite close to the lake anyway, partly being as the mountains confine the population that way. From what I saw, there aren't many buildings that look 'warehouse' enough, ones that would have large doors or expansive indoor spaces uninterrupted by supporting walls. Unlike the facilities in Villeneuve, and one reason I stuck hard to that theory, is that if you go north along the lake then they look too residential, some even 'palatial.'

 

Not sure if this link will work the way I want, but let's try here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure if this link will work the way I want, but let's try here

You can get a nice idea of the area if you click "More..." and check "Photos"

 

No monsters of course, but still :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, because he also told me where it is ~not~ and so now I have no idea where it is!

 

Damn the swiss and their secrecy laws. no one has let on anything more about this rumoured 115 ft monster, where does one hide such a beast? Any guesses on where it could be now. And havent they done a good job keeping everyone guessing.

 

Final exam question:

 

What ontology informs a statement claiming "we know where the boat is not?"

 

What theory or process could be deployed to unmask all the places where it is not.

 

And then find where it is?

 

I am pretty certain it ain't in my bedroom.

 

Or the kitchen !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Duh - it's in the secret lair under the lake. EB being a fan of Bond villains thought this was the best choice....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, because he also told me where it is ~not~ and so now I have no idea where it is!

 

It had better be in Switzerland!

 

 

No, because he also told me where it is ~not~ and so now I have no idea where it is!

 

Damn the swiss and their secrecy laws. no one has let on anything more about this rumoured 115 ft monster, where does one hide such a beast? Any guesses on where it could be now. And havent they done a good job keeping everyone guessing.

 

Well I don't have permission to repeat more than what I did. But what he said leads me to believe what someone else told me quite recently, that I dismissed. I dismissed it in part because he never responded to a simple followup question, which was "what part of that can I post?"

 

Perhaps I should not have dismissed that info. Like this guy, he has no posts. And apparently he's not planning to answer any more from me anyway, and so I may as well say what ~that~ person said.

 

They said it was "between Villeneuve and Montreux."

 

 

Could they be building it in an underground tunnel?

 

Swiss do stuff like that !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure if this link will work the way I want, but let's try here

You can get a nice idea of the area if you click "More..." and check "Photos"

 

No monsters of course, but still :)

 

 

Looks like a good spot to me, on the west side of the canal, opposite of the marina, looks like a spot where dirt was being moved.

 

Maybe for a big tent.................

 

edit; let's try this again......

 

Villeneuve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Final exam question:

 

What ontology informs a statement claiming "we know where the boat is not?"

 

What theory or process could be deployed to unmask all the places where it is not.

 

And then find where it is?

 

I am pretty certain it ain't in my bedroom.

 

Or the kitchen !

Funny, and true. Yes, it's disappointing to me that it's in neither location I had fixated on. And it could be basically anywhere ""between Villeneuve and Montreux" because, in the absence of any fun spy shots and such, there's just absolutely no way of making a decent guess.

 

But it sure was fun to hear the one today about the boat being 'complete.' I bet she's quite a looker!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like a good spot to me, on the west side of the canal, opposite of the marina, looks like a spot where dirt was being moved.

 

Maybe for a big tent.................

 

Villenueve

Umm, that link took me to Villeneuve, FRANCE

 

You really are going to need a map if you make that trip!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But it sure was fun to hear the one today about the boat being 'complete.' I bet she's quite a looker!

 

 

I reckon !

 

And will personally award a toaster to the first person to post a credible spy shot of Cheesezilla !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like a good spot to me, on the west side of the canal, opposite of the marina, looks like a spot where dirt was being moved.

 

Maybe for a big tent.................

 

Villenueve

Umm, that link took me to Villeneuve, FRANCE

 

You really are going to need a map if you make that trip!

 

Check it again, had to edit. Swapped Villeneuve's on me for some reason?!?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We've been looking for the wrong thing, its CHOCZilla not Cheezilla. Are there any chocolate factories between Villenueve and Montreaux?

post-32090-1236655192_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Check it again, had to edit. Swapped Villeneuve's on me for some reason?!?!

You have to move to where you want to show, then click on the Link button (top-right) then copy where it says "Paste link in email or IM"

 

This photo is fuzzy, but it still gives an idea the area

http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/6070816.jpg

 

The red roof may be one of the roofs at here, haven't really thought about it yet.

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source...mp;t=h&z=16

 

Did it twice and the second one worked.

 

The area due west of the red roof, where the canal enters the lake and there is a gap in the breakwater would be a nice spot for a Vehicle Assembly Tent...............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Could they be building it in an underground tunnel?

 

Swiss do stuff like that !

 

There's one heck of a tunnel here

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source...mp;t=k&z=15

Follow the big highway, they went right through the mountain with it.

 

Halfway along, but on the lake, there's a marina that I think is also a ferry terminal. The two red-roofed buildings could be candidates - a good sized marina, maybe cranes, .. :)

 

okay, fixed that link..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This photo is fuzzy, but it still gives an idea the area

http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/6070816.jpg

 

The red roof may be one of the roofs at here, haven't really thought about it yet.

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source....01811&z=16

 

(fixed this one too)

 

 

The building with the red roof is the local sports complex, which is on the opposite side of Montreux to Villeneuve. A small district called Clarens..

Most of the photos and maps you guys are looking at are quite outdated..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This photo is fuzzy, but it still gives an idea the area

http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/6070816.jpg

 

The red roof may be one of the roofs at here, haven't really thought about it yet.

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source....01811&z=16

 

(fixed this one too)

 

 

OK .... Swiss Anarchists .. Haul thy butt over to the red building and look in the windows.

 

May not fit your culture but beg forgiveness, not permission !

 

Evidence of boat building?

 

Vanity number plates on vehicles in the parking lot?

 

What does the bloke in the local coffee shop say is happening in that building?

 

If it is a sports complex we return to "go" - collecting a coffee on the way.

 

Stingray is entitled to get some sleep at night.

 

So get on it !!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Most of the photos and maps you guys are looking at are quite outdated..

 

 

Moon Unit ... if these are outdated, can you give us a hand?

Any hints on where Cheesezilla resides?

 

Anywhere near this area?

 

Or somewhere else?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Most of the photos and maps you guys are looking at are quite outdated..

 

 

Moon Unit ... if these are outdated, can you give us a hand?

Any hints on where Cheesezilla resides?

 

Anywhere near this area?

 

Or somewhere else?

 

Not far away from there, not sure how i can help with any maps sorry..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This photo is fuzzy, but it still gives an idea the area

http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/6070816.jpg

 

The red roof may be one of the roofs at here, haven't really thought about it yet.

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source....01811&z=16

 

 

The building with the red roof is the local sports complex, which is on the opposite side of Montreux to Villeneuve. A small district called Clarens..

Yes, thanks for the correction and clarification. My silly mistake, I had turned the sat-map labels to "off" while following the shoreline looking for any nice locations.

 

Most of the photos and maps you guys are looking at are quite outdated..

Yes, I noticed that in Villeneuve too. Even the Decision yard had a new roof in recent photo's, including in the ones that Alinghi provided, compared to the Google Map ones. Someone suggested that the boat is being kept in a 'temporary' building - but they did not clarify if that meant a 'temporary' building like how DZ had their VAB tent facility, or it they meant "it is in a permanent building, temporarily."

 

Are you saying a recently-built, temporary facility? That ~would~ make more sense. ?

 

And between Chateau Chilon and Territet, probably?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a nice location, there is a ferry terminal (so good dock facilities) and a train station (so good platform/facilities) and both can likely accomodate cranes.

 

And there are two roofs, each large enough to house big hulls. It would make logical sense to a planner, it that is all true.

 

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source...m.panoramio.all

 

 

Another nice location, if it is a temporary building we can't see on Google, could be here. It's just a half mile south of the ferry terminal and has a small marina, and is next to the rail line, but I see no platform a crane could stand on. Maybe they put some things in the vineyard?

 

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source...004528&z=18

 

edit: this second location seems less likely, because it is part of the Chateau's vineyard and this photo suggests the slope is too steep going up to the railroad.

http://www.panoramio.com/photo/5116412

 

Logistics must be quite hard around here.

 

Pretty boat, taken nearby: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/13367334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's a nice location, there is a ferry terminal (so good dock facilities) and a train station (so good platform/facilities) and both can likely accomodate cranes.

 

And there are two roofs, each large enough to house big hulls. It would make logical sense to a planner, it that is all true.

 

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source...m.panoramio.all

 

Well scratch that one too. Like the other marina to the south, this ferry terminal one is too small for a monster.

http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/16535301.jpg

 

And like much of this area, the place is steep! And it is already built up with well established infrastructure along the lake, except for in the parks and vineyards.

 

Guessing about CZ being along the water and the rail line may not be clever after all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Most of the photos and maps you guys are looking at are quite outdated..

 

 

Moon Unit ... if these are outdated, can you give us a hand?

Any hints on where Cheesezilla resides?

 

Anywhere near this area?

 

Or somewhere else?

 

Not far away from there, not sure how i can help with any maps sorry..

 

How far away?

 

And it what direction?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not forget.

 

Toaster to the first person posting a credible picture of the Big Cheese.

 

Sooner the better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is great - Got a PM from someone I've learned to trust. With their permission:

 

"Hey, you can take it from me that the boat is fully built. There are no sails as yet and Ernesto doesn't want to launch it unless he has to."

 

On this, it may be "fully built" but I doubt that it is also bonded. I think it's probably still in pieces.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is great - Got a PM from someone I've learned to trust. With their permission:

 

"Hey, you can take it from me that the boat is fully built. There are no sails as yet and Ernesto doesn't want to launch it unless he has to."

 

On this, it may be "fully built" but I doubt that it is also bonded. I think it's probably still in pieces.

If so, Alinghi's statements on this have been straight forward all along.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, because he also told me where it is ~not~ and so now I have no idea where it is!

 

It had better be in Switzerland!

 

 

No, because he also told me where it is ~not~ and so now I have no idea where it is!

 

Damn the swiss and their secrecy laws. no one has let on anything more about this rumoured 115 ft monster, where does one hide such a beast? Any guesses on where it could be now. And havent they done a good job keeping everyone guessing.

 

Well I don't have permission to repeat more than what I did. But what he said leads me to believe what someone else told me quite recently, that I dismissed. I dismissed it in part because he never responded to a simple followup question, which was "what part of that can I post?"

 

Perhaps I should not have dismissed that info. Like this guy, he has no posts. And apparently he's not planning to answer any more from me anyway, and so I may as well say what ~that~ person said.

 

They said it was "between Villeneuve and Montreux."

 

At the time, I looked for buildings large enough to hold monster hulls but didn't see any. There are just two villages between Villeneuve and Montreux - Veytaux and Grandchamps. The only likelihood it is close to the lake is if they were to assemble and launch it on the lake. If they did "bond" it then I don;t effing know how they could get it to, say, the Med. But everything is quite close to the lake anyway, partly being as the mountains confine the population that way. From what I saw, there aren't many buildings that look 'warehouse' enough, ones that would have large doors or expansive indoor spaces uninterrupted by supporting walls. Unlike the facilities in Villeneuve, and one reason I stuck hard to that theory, is that if you go north along the lake then they look too residential, some even 'palatial.'

 

Not sure if this link will work the way I want, but let's try here

 

If we believe Stingray's source, and I have no reason to doubt him. If 'Ray believes him, that's good enough for me..... then how about this?

 

Seeing as all of this is starting to take on quite the "cloak and dagger" mystique.. : What if it isn't ~inside~ out of sight? EB and his minions are pretty devious... I've examined that coastline and inland area and agree with the esteemed Stingray that there don't appear to be any buildings that fit the bill. What if, however, it were hidden in plain sight? Under mesh, strewn with shrubbery... painted like a tennis court, empty parking lot or vacant marina? Or... painted medium blue and sunk somewhere along that coast?

 

(I'm not really a wacko... and I do NOT believe in the magic bullet...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

The latest suggestion we have is that Alinghi's initial order from North (and from the USA, not Alinghi/Blacksails) was for delivery in May. It is possible they couldn't get them any earlier at the price EB was willing to pay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's a nice location, there is a ferry terminal (so good dock facilities) and a train station (so good platform/facilities) and both can likely accomodate cranes.

 

And there are two roofs, each large enough to house big hulls. It would make logical sense to a planner, it that is all true.

 

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source...m.panoramio.all

 

Well scratch that one too. Like the other marina to the south, this ferry terminal one is too small for a monster.

http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/16535301.jpg

 

And like much of this area, the place is steep! And it is already built up with well established infrastructure along the lake, except for in the parks and vineyards.

 

Guessing about CZ being along the water and the rail line may not be clever after all.

 

OK, been at the club all day helping run a Fireball regatta (or better yet.......waiting on the seabreeze to fill-in).

 

Where do I need to negotiate a trip to with William Shatner................Villeneuve, or one of these other places. Somebody Google and mark the map so I can do a 'Home of the Stars' type tour around lake Geneva, looking for a 'CheezeZilla'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know there can be very different dates on adjacent patches of the mosiac photos... how current are our Google "Spyshots"? I also think it would be extremely easy to hide in plain sight from above... IF it were also secluded from the sideview/street view to ward off triangulation to get a fix on it. A tall fence and any of boatpartsguy's suggestions would keep it well hidden unless we could get some time on one of NSA's birds... The resolution available there is PHEnomenal! Any anarchist out there that is a FED in the World offline?.... kinda like a long haired hippy freak in disguise as G-man. I remember that role, gah how stifling!!!!!!!!!!!

 

13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Moon Unit gives the impression he knows the location of Cheesezilla.

 

So, all we need is for him to say where it is.

 

And a search can be mounted.

 

Moon Unit .... your move!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Moon Unit gives the impression he knows the location of Cheesezilla.

 

So, all we need is for him to say where it is.

 

And a search can be mounted.

 

Moon Unit .... your move!

 

Sorry to give you a false impression.. I only know where it's not...

In saying that, you are on the right track.. I think.. B)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Flights to Geneva are very cheap right now, Hastings. Hop on one and go do some detective work near the lake. Find the prize, take a picture, and I'll send you some really cool swag.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

And she used a local British pilot for the race round the Island.

 

But it doesn't really matter, 'cos there was no Deed of Gift drawn up till 36 years later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

 

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

 

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

 

Everything that came after the 1st race is surely a part of the context of the Americas Cup.

 

Any organized yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented, or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea, or on an arm of the sea, or one which combines both, shall always be entitled to the right of sailing a match for this Cup with a yacht or vessel propelled by sails only and constructed in the country to which the challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel constructed in the country of the Club holding the Cup.

 

I see in the DoG that the vessel must be constructed in the country of the challenging and defending clubs but do not see where it says the sails have to be made there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

 

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

 

Everything that came after the 1st race is surely a part of the context of the Americas Cup.

 

Any organized yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented, or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea, or on an arm of the sea, or one which combines both, shall always be entitled to the right of sailing a match for this Cup with a yacht or vessel propelled by sails only and constructed in the country to which the challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel constructed in the country of the Club holding the Cup.

 

I see in the DoG that the vessel must be constructed in the country of the challenging and defending clubs but do not see where it says the sails have to be made there.

 

And you don't think that sails are part of the "vessel" in question?

 

Did Schuyler not intend the America's Cup as a test of the technological prowess of the clubs and nations involved?

 

Are sails not a huge part of the technological equation in modern sailboats?

 

Would old Georgie-boy have approved of one of the major speed determining components of a defending yacht being built in the challenging country by a company owned and operated in that country and using technology and know-how available exclusively in that country?

 

I think he might at least raise an eyebrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

 

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

 

Everything that came after the 1st race is surely a part of the context of the Americas Cup.

 

Any organized yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented, or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea, or on an arm of the sea, or one which combines both, shall always be entitled to the right of sailing a match for this Cup with a yacht or vessel propelled by sails only and constructed in the country to which the challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel constructed in the country of the Club holding the Cup.

 

I see in the DoG that the vessel must be constructed in the country of the challenging and defending clubs but do not see where it says the sails have to be made there.

 

Your boy Erne$to doesn't see where is says that a club has to have held a regatta prior to issuing their challenge either.

 

We know from prior court filings that Erne$to is making an issue out of GGYC's CHR not being submitted with their challenge, when he is also saying they are not the challenger.

 

Therefore, is it a real leap to think that he's going to file suit about the CHR as soon as the CoA rules, if they do rule in favor of GGYC?

 

And to counter that, why would GGYC not try to legally prevent the use of sails made in another country by SNG in a DoG match?

 

So, Erne$to will have helped to keep the New York legal community fully employed when he starts the suing, again, over the CHR.

 

The best way to end all of this is to have SNG removed as the Trustee, and by natural extension, Alinghi as the defending team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The best way to end all of this is to have SNG removed as the Trustee, and by natural extension, Alinghi as the defending team.

That is not the best way. The best way for this to end is for someone to beat SNG/Alinghi in a sailboat race and take the cup home with them. Even worse than Alinghi's false scare scenario of GGYC using legal maneuvering to force a one-on-one DoG match "excluding" 18 challengers, would be for someone to actually use legal maneuvering to take the cup away without any racing whatsoever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The best way to end all of this is to have SNG removed as the Trustee, and by natural extension, Alinghi as the defending team.

That is not the best way. The best way for this to end is for someone to beat SNG/Alinghi in a sailboat race and take the cup home with them. Even worse than Alinghi's false scare scenario of GGYC using legal maneuvering to force a one-on-one DoG match "excluding" 18 challengers, would be for someone to actually use legal maneuvering to take the cup away without any racing whatsoever.

 

MAHGUAH SAY BROTHER PJH-

 

SO ARE YOU SAYING IF A TRUSTEE -TEAM IS ILLEGALLY OPERATING THE TRUST AND IS IN BREACH OF TRUST -IT[bREACH OF TRUST] SHOULDNT BE PROSECUTED

 

IN COURT ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anarchy Challenge gets a mention, here:

--

 

Kan komme når som helst

Can come anytime

 

Afgørelsen fra den amerikanske højesteret ventes indenfor den næste måned, men kan komme hver dag det skal være.

 

The decision by the U.S. Supreme Court is expected within the next month, but can come every day it should be.

 

Rygter viderebragt af den meget åbenmundede redaktion på Sailing Anarchy siger, at Oracle skulle ligge an til en sejr.

 

Rumors passed on by the very open ended redaktion on Sailing Anarchy says that Oracle would be an a victory.

 

Sailing Anarchy har i øvrigt lanceret sin egen udfordring, den såkaldte ”people’s challenge”, eller SAYC – Sailing Anarchy Yacht Club , som en slags humoristisk kommentar til cirkusset omkring mere eller mindre virkelig sejlklubber.

 

Sailing Anarchy has also launched its own challenge, the so-called "people's challenge, or SAYC - Sailing Anarchy Yacht Club, as a kind of humorous commentary on the circus surrounding more or less real sailing clubs.

 

 

--

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The best way to end all of this is to have SNG removed as the Trustee, and by natural extension, Alinghi as the defending team.

That is not the best way. The best way for this to end is for someone to beat SNG/Alinghi in a sailboat race and take the cup home with them. Even worse than Alinghi's false scare scenario of GGYC using legal maneuvering to force a one-on-one DoG match "excluding" 18 challengers, would be for someone to actually use legal maneuvering to take the cup away without any racing whatsoever.

MAHGUAH SAY BROTHER PJH-

 

SO ARE YOU SAYING IF A TRUSTEE -TEAM IS ILLEGALLY OPERATING THE TRUST AND IS IN BREACH OF TRUST -IT[bREACH OF TRUST] SHOULDN'T BE PROSECUTED IN COURT ?

I think it will be exceeding hard to prove that SNG have done anything illegal under the trust. We all like to talk about "self dealing" and "hand picking" a compliant sham challenger, but proving those allegations will be difficult, and I am not certain these actions were taken for any illegal purpose. The big change in "modernizing/monetizing" the America's Cup competition started with AC 32, with the "Acts" and the increased emphasis on corporate sponsorship opportunities, and making the event self-sustaining. GGYC was in the middle of planning for those changes and agreed to them. Was that illegal?

 

There doesn't seem to me to be an easy way out of the current situation. I'd sure like to know the details of the negotiations between SNG, GGYC, and NYYC pertaining to Ernesto's desire to "modernize" the Cup competition. I would especially like to know how far NYYC was willing to go in agreeing to plans for change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

 

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

 

Everything that came after the 1st race is surely a part of the context of the Americas Cup.

 

Any organized yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented, or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea, or on an arm of the sea, or one which combines both, shall always be entitled to the right of sailing a match for this Cup with a yacht or vessel propelled by sails only and constructed in the country to which the challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel constructed in the country of the Club holding the Cup.

 

I see in the DoG that the vessel must be constructed in the country of the challenging and defending clubs but do not see where it says the sails have to be made there.

 

And you don't think that sails are part of the "vessel" in question?

 

Did Schuyler not intend the America's Cup as a test of the technological prowess of the clubs and nations involved?

 

Are sails not a huge part of the technological equation in modern sailboats?

 

Would old Georgie-boy have approved of one of the major speed determining components of a defending yacht being built in the challenging country by a company owned and operated in that country and using technology and know-how available exclusively in that country?

 

I think he might at least raise an eyebrow.

 

 

 

As I said above America had a jib boom and flying jib made in Cowes so why would GS take exception to it or even raise an eyebrow?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

 

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

 

Everything that came after the 1st race is surely a part of the context of the Americas Cup.

 

Any organized yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented, or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea, or on an arm of the sea, or one which combines both, shall always be entitled to the right of sailing a match for this Cup with a yacht or vessel propelled by sails only and constructed in the country to which the challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel constructed in the country of the Club holding the Cup.

 

I see in the DoG that the vessel must be constructed in the country of the challenging and defending clubs but do not see where it says the sails have to be made there.

 

Your boy Erne$to doesn't see where is says that a club has to have held a regatta prior to issuing their challenge either.

 

We know from prior court filings that Erne$to is making an issue out of GGYC's CHR not being submitted with their challenge, when he is also saying they are not the challenger.

 

Therefore, is it a real leap to think that he's going to file suit about the CHR as soon as the CoA rules, if they do rule in favor of GGYC?

 

And to counter that, why would GGYC not try to legally prevent the use of sails made in another country by SNG in a DoG match?

 

So, Erne$to will have helped to keep the New York legal community fully employed when he starts the suing, again, over the CHR.

 

The best way to end all of this is to have SNG removed as the Trustee, and by natural extension, Alinghi as the defending team.

 

1ST of all, eb is as much my boy as you are - I dislike both of you.

As usual, you do not answer my post about sails being built overseas, but go off on your normal -annual regatta, chr, legal community employment, have sng removed as trustee froth job - same post different day!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure that all of Lipton's Shamrocks challenged with US made sails. I think others from the 90' and J boat eras have used spars from the US as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

 

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

 

Everything that came after the 1st race is surely a part of the context of the Americas Cup.

 

Any organized yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented, or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea, or on an arm of the sea, or one which combines both, shall always be entitled to the right of sailing a match for this Cup with a yacht or vessel propelled by sails only and constructed in the country to which the challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel constructed in the country of the Club holding the Cup.

 

I see in the DoG that the vessel must be constructed in the country of the challenging and defending clubs but do not see where it says the sails have to be made there.

 

And you don't think that sails are part of the "vessel" in question?

 

Did Schuyler not intend the America's Cup as a test of the technological prowess of the clubs and nations involved?

 

Are sails not a huge part of the technological equation in modern sailboats?

 

Would old Georgie-boy have approved of one of the major speed determining components of a defending yacht being built in the challenging country by a company owned and operated in that country and using technology and know-how available exclusively in that country?

 

I think he might at least raise an eyebrow.

 

 

 

As I said above America had a jib boom and flying jib made in Cowes so why would GS take exception to it or even raise an eyebrow?

 

Because America didn't sail in the America's Cup?

 

Besides, America's jib boom and flying jib didn't represent technology that wasn't available in the US.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

 

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

 

Everything that came after the 1st race is surely a part of the context of the Americas Cup.

 

Any organized yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented, or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea, or on an arm of the sea, or one which combines both, shall always be entitled to the right of sailing a match for this Cup with a yacht or vessel propelled by sails only and constructed in the country to which the challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel constructed in the country of the Club holding the Cup.

 

I see in the DoG that the vessel must be constructed in the country of the challenging and defending clubs but do not see where it says the sails have to be made there.

 

And you don't think that sails are part of the "vessel" in question?

 

Did Schuyler not intend the America's Cup as a test of the technological prowess of the clubs and nations involved?

 

Are sails not a huge part of the technological equation in modern sailboats?

 

Would old Georgie-boy have approved of one of the major speed determining components of a defending yacht being built in the challenging country by a company owned and operated in that country and using technology and know-how available exclusively in that country?

 

I think he might at least raise an eyebrow.

 

 

 

As I said above America had a jib boom and flying jib made in Cowes so why would GS take exception to it or even raise an eyebrow?

 

Because America didn't sail in the America's Cup?

 

Besides, America's jib boom and flying jib didn't represent technology that wasn't available in the US.

 

The second item here is the important one. In 1851 sail technology (other than size) made almost no difference in yacht performance. Now, sail material and fabrication are just as, or even more, important to yacht performance that is the hull design.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Because America didn't sail in the America's Cup?

 

Besides, America's jib boom and flying jib didn't represent technology that wasn't available in the US.

 

The second item here is the important one. In 1851 sail technology (other than size) made almost no difference in yacht performance. Now, sail material and fabrication are just as, or even more, important to yacht performance that is the hull design.

 

Ding ding ding.

 

3DL sails represent a significant technological advantage and they are made in one place on earth...which just so happens to be in one of the competing nations.

 

We're not talking about bolts that are made everywhere in the world and Alinghi is sourcing them from the US for convenience sake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

 

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

 

Everything that came after the 1st race is surely a part of the context of the Americas Cup.

 

Any organized yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented, or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea, or on an arm of the sea, or one which combines both, shall always be entitled to the right of sailing a match for this Cup with a yacht or vessel propelled by sails only and constructed in the country to which the challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel constructed in the country of the Club holding the Cup.

 

I see in the DoG that the vessel must be constructed in the country of the challenging and defending clubs but do not see where it says the sails have to be made there.

 

Your boy Erne$to doesn't see where is says that a club has to have held a regatta prior to issuing their challenge either.

 

We know from prior court filings that Erne$to is making an issue out of GGYC's CHR not being submitted with their challenge, when he is also saying they are not the challenger.

 

Therefore, is it a real leap to think that he's going to file suit about the CHR as soon as the CoA rules, if they do rule in favor of GGYC?

 

And to counter that, why would GGYC not try to legally prevent the use of sails made in another country by SNG in a DoG match?

 

So, Erne$to will have helped to keep the New York legal community fully employed when he starts the suing, again, over the CHR.

 

The best way to end all of this is to have SNG removed as the Trustee, and by natural extension, Alinghi as the defending team.

 

1ST of all, eb is as much my boy as you are - I dislike both of you.

As usual, you do not answer my post about sails being built overseas, but go off on your normal -annual regatta, chr, legal community employment, have sng removed as trustee froth job - same post different day!

 

You don't seem to like anything about GGYC, and claim to not like EB, so what is exactly that you do like?

 

I didn't answer your question, because it is not relevant.

 

America did not sail in the America's Cup.

 

And - the whole issue of "constructed in the country of origin" is ambiguous and needs clarity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

Everything that came after the 1st race is surely a part of the context of the Americas Cup.

 

Any organized yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented, or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea, or on an arm of the sea, or one which combines both, shall always be entitled to the right of sailing a match for this Cup with a yacht or vessel propelled by sails only and constructed in the country to which the challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel constructed in the country of the Club holding the Cup.

 

I see in the DoG that the vessel must be constructed in the country of the challenging and defending clubs but do not see where it says the sails have to be made there.

Your boy Erne$to doesn't see where is says that a club has to have held a regatta prior to issuing their challenge either.

 

We know from prior court filings that Erne$to is making an issue out of GGYC's CHR not being submitted with their challenge, when he is also saying they are not the challenger.

 

Therefore, is it a real leap to think that he's going to file suit about the CHR as soon as the CoA rules, if they do rule in favor of GGYC?

 

And to counter that, why would GGYC not try to legally prevent the use of sails made in another country by SNG in a DoG match?

 

So, Erne$to will have helped to keep the New York legal community fully employed when he starts the suing, again, over the CHR.

 

The best way to end all of this is to have SNG removed as the Trustee, and by natural extension, Alinghi as the defending team.

1ST of all, eb is as much my boy as you are - I dislike both of you.

As usual, you do not answer my post about sails being built overseas, but go off on your normal -annual regatta, chr, legal community employment, have sng removed as trustee froth job - same post different day!

You don't seem to like anything about GGYC, and claim to not like EB, so what is exactly that you do like?

 

I didn't answer your question, because it is not relevant.

 

America did not sail in the America's Cup.

 

And - the whole issue of "constructed in the country of origin" is ambiguous and needs clarity.

 

B) How much would you like to see clarity brought to that clause in the Deed? If GGYC loses a DoG match to a SNG yacht equipped with 3DL North Sales, would you support a GGYC lawsuit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And - the whole issue of "constructed in the country of origin" is ambiguous and needs clarity.

If someone were to look to external evidence for the meaning of the phrase and its practical implementation, then wouldn't they look to the '88 DoG Match? It's the only non-MC one that has happened.

 

The IR's that allowed sails to be purchased off shore were by MC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

 

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

 

Everything that came after the 1st race is surely a part of the context of the Americas Cup.

 

Any organized yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented, or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea, or on an arm of the sea, or one which combines both, shall always be entitled to the right of sailing a match for this Cup with a yacht or vessel propelled by sails only and constructed in the country to which the challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel constructed in the country of the Club holding the Cup.

 

I see in the DoG that the vessel must be constructed in the country of the challenging and defending clubs but do not see where it says the sails have to be made there.

 

And you don't think that sails are part of the "vessel" in question?

 

Did Schuyler not intend the America's Cup as a test of the technological prowess of the clubs and nations involved?

 

Are sails not a huge part of the technological equation in modern sailboats?

 

Would old Georgie-boy have approved of one of the major speed determining components of a defending yacht being built in the challenging country by a company owned and operated in that country and using technology and know-how available exclusively in that country?

 

I think he might at least raise an eyebrow.

 

 

 

As I said above America had a jib boom and flying jib made in Cowes so why would GS take exception to it or even raise an eyebrow?

 

Because America didn't sail in the America's Cup?

 

Besides, America's jib boom and flying jib didn't represent technology that wasn't available in the US.

 

The second item here is the important one. In 1851 sail technology (other than size) made almost no difference in yacht performance. Now, sail material and fabrication are just as, or even more, important to yacht performance that is the hull design.

 

So the race between America and the British boats had no effect on the thinking that went into the DoG?

 

The jib boom and flying jib were built in Cowes so it does no matter where the technology came from.

 

You are absolutely wrong on the subject of sail technology in 1851 -American sails were made of cotton which was a big advantage over the flax sails used by the British boats but again the owners of America had no problem having a sail built in Cowes, and also several of the British boats had way more sail area than America.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

 

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

 

Everything that came after the 1st race is surely a part of the context of the Americas Cup.

 

Any organized yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented, or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea, or on an arm of the sea, or one which combines both, shall always be entitled to the right of sailing a match for this Cup with a yacht or vessel propelled by sails only and constructed in the country to which the challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel constructed in the country of the Club holding the Cup.

 

I see in the DoG that the vessel must be constructed in the country of the challenging and defending clubs but do not see where it says the sails have to be made there.

 

And you don't think that sails are part of the "vessel" in question?

 

Did Schuyler not intend the America's Cup as a test of the technological prowess of the clubs and nations involved?

 

Are sails not a huge part of the technological equation in modern sailboats?

 

Would old Georgie-boy have approved of one of the major speed determining components of a defending yacht being built in the challenging country by a company owned and operated in that country and using technology and know-how available exclusively in that country?

 

I think he might at least raise an eyebrow.

 

 

 

As I said above America had a jib boom and flying jib made in Cowes so why would GS take exception to it or even raise an eyebrow?

 

Because America didn't sail in the America's Cup?

 

Besides, America's jib boom and flying jib didn't represent technology that wasn't available in the US.

 

The second item here is the important one. In 1851 sail technology (other than size) made almost no difference in yacht performance. Now, sail material and fabrication are just as, or even more, important to yacht performance that is the hull design.

 

So the race between America and the British boats had no effect on the thinking that went into the DoG?

 

The jib boom and flying jib were built in Cowes so it does no matter where the technology came from.

 

You are absolutely wrong on the subject of sail technology in 1851 -American sails were made of cotton which was a big advantage over the flax sails used by the British boats but again the owners of America had no problem having a sail built in Cowes, and also several of the British boats had way more sail area than America.

 

Anyhow, it's just a membrane which would be imported from the US. Custom-wise the "last significant process" trimming and finishing could easily be done in the land-locked country making the sail eligible for a Swiss certificate of origin, so ... no angle of attack there, I would think.

The mast and winches might be a different story though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

 

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

 

Everything that came after the 1st race is surely a part of the context of the Americas Cup.

 

Any organized yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented, or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea, or on an arm of the sea, or one which combines both, shall always be entitled to the right of sailing a match for this Cup with a yacht or vessel propelled by sails only and constructed in the country to which the challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel constructed in the country of the Club holding the Cup.

 

I see in the DoG that the vessel must be constructed in the country of the challenging and defending clubs but do not see where it says the sails have to be made there.

 

Your boy Erne$to doesn't see where is says that a club has to have held a regatta prior to issuing their challenge either.

 

We know from prior court filings that Erne$to is making an issue out of GGYC's CHR not being submitted with their challenge, when he is also saying they are not the challenger.

 

Therefore, is it a real leap to think that he's going to file suit about the CHR as soon as the CoA rules, if they do rule in favor of GGYC?

 

And to counter that, why would GGYC not try to legally prevent the use of sails made in another country by SNG in a DoG match?

 

So, Erne$to will have helped to keep the New York legal community fully employed when he starts the suing, again, over the CHR.

 

The best way to end all of this is to have SNG removed as the Trustee, and by natural extension, Alinghi as the defending team.

 

1ST of all, eb is as much my boy as you are - I dislike both of you.

As usual, you do not answer my post about sails being built overseas, but go off on your normal -annual regatta, chr, legal community employment, have sng removed as trustee froth job - same post different day!

 

You don't seem to like anything about GGYC, and claim to not like EB, so what is exactly that you do like?

 

I didn't answer your question, because it is not relevant.

 

America did not sail in the America's Cup.

 

And - the whole issue of "constructed in the country of origin" is ambiguous and needs clarity.

 

 

As I have said here before I don't think there is a cunt hair difference between eb and le, and ggyc is an le 'bought and paid for' yc just like cnev, and it has no say in the le/te/rc/bmwo party line or how the ac campaign is run.

 

So you are saying that the 1st race had nothing to do with the thinking that went into the DoG.

 

On the one hand you say that my question on sails is not relevent but one sentence later you say that the whole issue of contructed in the country of origin is ambiguous and needs clarity. So I suppose it's ok to clarify the DoG so long as it favours your heros.

It's funny how anything that doesn't fit into your current thinking is dismissed as irrelevent and that pretty much sums you up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
'cos there was no Deed of Gift drawn up till 36 years later.

 

The first Deed of Gift was dated July 8, 1857, how do you figure this was 36 years after August 1, 1851 ????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, because he also told me where it is ~not~ and so now I have no idea where it is!

 

Damn the swiss and their secrecy laws. no one has let on anything more about this rumoured 115 ft monster, where does one hide such a beast? Any guesses on where it could be now. And havent they done a good job keeping everyone guessing.

 

 

They said it was "between Villeneuve and Montreux."

 

At the time, I looked for buildings large enough to hold monster hulls but didn't see any. There are just two villages between Villeneuve and Montreux - Veytaux and Grandchamps. The only likelihood it is close to the lake is if they were to assemble and launch it on the lake. If they did "bond" it then I don;t effing know how they could get it to, say, the Med. But everything is quite close to the lake anyway, partly being as the mountains confine the population that way. From what I saw, there aren't many buildings that look 'warehouse' enough, ones that would have large doors or expansive indoor spaces uninterrupted by supporting walls. Unlike the facilities in Villeneuve, and one reason I stuck hard to that theory, is that if you go north along the lake then they look too residential, some even 'palatial.'

 

Not sure if this link will work the way I want, but let's try here

 

If we believe Stingray's source, and I have no reason to doubt him. If 'Ray believes him, that's good enough for me..... then how about this?

 

Seeing as all of this is starting to take on quite the "cloak and dagger" mystique.. : What if it isn't ~inside~ out of sight? EB and his minions are pretty devious... I've examined that coastline and inland area and agree with the esteemed Stingray that there don't appear to be any buildings that fit the bill. What if, however, it were hidden in plain sight? Under mesh, strewn with shrubbery... painted like a tennis court, empty parking lot or vacant marina? Or... painted medium blue and sunk somewhere along that coast?

 

(I'm not really a wacko... and I do NOT believe in the magic bullet...)

 

 

I know there can be very different dates on adjacent patches of the mosiac photos... how current are our Google "Spyshots"? I also think it would be extremely easy to hide in plain sight from above... IF it were also secluded from the sideview/street view to ward off triangulation to get a fix on it. A tall fence and any of boatpartsguy's suggestions would keep it well hidden unless we could get some time on one of NSA's birds... The resolution available there is PHEnomenal! Any anarchist out there that is a FED in the World offline?.... kinda like a long haired hippy freak in disguise as G-man. I remember that role, gah how stifling!!!!!!!!!!!

 

13

 

How can one tell the date on the Google Map images? Seems you used to be able to tell somehow but now I think they are "blended" into mosaics from different sources, making that impossible because the sources were taken at different times?

 

There was an article recently about the recently released Google Oceans, and how some people saw patterns on the sea bed, and somehow leaped to the conclusion it was Atlantis, and so Google explained how some that "mosaic" processing had just left a 'residue' in the images. It's just a guess that the same happens here.. ?

 

What we need are recent satellite of aerial shots of that small lake coast. Since November should do the trick but the newer the better. Are there any other resources for it? Reading back thru the posts, this building is new - and it must really stand out. It would be quite a score to locate CZ's birthplace.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were rumors that Alinghi had booked time on North's 3DL machine. Any further word on that?

 

Is Alinghi going to move that 3DL machine to Switzerland and then make the sails so they can be Deed legal?

 

 

Would you care to comment on the fact that America had a sprit jibboom and a flying jib built by the Ratsey's of Cowes a couple of days before the big race?

 

Sure.

 

If I understand you correctly, the race you are citing was not even The America's Cup.

 

Everything that came after the 1st race is surely a part of the context of the Americas Cup.

 

Any organized yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented, or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea, or on an arm of the sea, or one which combines both, shall always be entitled to the right of sailing a match for this Cup with a yacht or vessel propelled by sails only and constructed in the country to which the challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel constructed in the country of the Club holding the Cup.

 

I see in the DoG that the vessel must be constructed in the country of the challenging and defending clubs but do not see where it says the sails have to be made there.

 

 

Ro .... the DOG was not written until long after the race around the Isle of Wight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites