She sets off- Abby Sunderland Teen seeks to break record for youngest round the marble
#1951
Posted 08 June 2010 - 04:10 PM
I wouldn't send a chimp around the world if Larry had anything to do with it. Having the proper shakedown gives a sailor a fighting chance, especially when you're doing a circumnavigation. And let's not forget your child's safety!!! But hey, he looks good on TV!! Cute for the ladies.... "so Abby you ready to sail around the world now"
Temptation is the fire that brings up the scum of the heart!
#1952
Posted 08 June 2010 - 04:41 PM
Thanks to Scott for the insight. Straight and to the point with no sugar coating.
If Abby makes it through the nasty weather forcast for this week OK we may have to mirror Ms Watson's effort and start a RESPECT thread. She may have fallen short on the non-stop part of the quest but the cards were stacked against her much more so than Jessica.
All that said it's still Alessandro di Benedetto who gets my utmost respect. He's crossed the equator and well on his way back to France in his 21' mini with half a mast, not to mention dragging a huge set of balls behind him.
#1953
Posted 08 June 2010 - 04:42 PM
#1954
Posted 08 June 2010 - 08:52 PM
longy, on 08 June 2010 - 04:42 PM, said:
I am well aware of the need to 100% recharge AGM batteries that is why i fully charged them twice or three times in Cape Town. in Abby's case at sea it is just not practical to fully recharge them just takes too many engine hours to get that last 20% to 30%. That last 20% to 30% will take just about as long with 400 Ah of batteries as it will with 800 Ah of batteries with our setup.
If she can keep them a little higher like i have suggested they have a better chance of getting close to top off during daylight hours. but now without the wind generators it a bit harder.She does occasionally get up to 12.5 to 12.6 or so and that is with load on the batteries.
I have been using LifeLine AGM batteries for more than 15 years and most all of my customers get 4-5 even 8 to 12 years good use out of them but in Abby's case we are not looking for longevity. They only need to last 6-8 months under the abuse we are giving them.
In Wild Eyes and Abby's case the benefits outweigh the drawbacks IMHO.
For now she is concentrating on getting through some pretty rough weather right now she is prepared and all is going well as last i heard.
Scott
#1956
Posted 08 June 2010 - 09:08 PM
SMSScott, on 08 June 2010 - 05:32 AM, said:
We now get 165 amps from the alternators and 14.5 volts. There is now probably about 60-70 hours on the belts and this setup (this include about 60 hour's testing and charging the batteries full several times in Cape Town) Abby has reported it is still working much better then before.
It seamed a bit long to me when i wrote it down, the 60 hours of testing i quickly calculated from the limited engine hour meter log i can reference. After looking at dates and log hours more closely and thinking about how we never added fuel till we toped of the reported 30 gal tank before she left. It must have been more like 30 to 40 hours of testing so probably 50 to 65 hours on the belts and setup by this time.
Scott
#1957
Posted 08 June 2010 - 10:27 PM
#1958
Posted 08 June 2010 - 11:54 PM
coggs, on 08 June 2010 - 04:41 PM, said:
Thanks to Scott for the insight. Straight and to the point with no sugar coating.
If Abby makes it through the nasty weather forcast for this week OK we may have to mirror Ms Watson's effort and start a RESPECT thread. She may have fallen short on the non-stop part of the quest but the cards were stacked against her much more so than Jessica.
All that said it's still Alessandro di Benedetto who gets my utmost respect. He's crossed the equator and well on his way back to France in his 21' mini with half a mast, not to mention dragging a huge set of balls behind him.
Vamos Alessandro !!!!!!!!
#1959
Posted 09 June 2010 - 02:15 PM
Thank you for the details.
You have earned my respect.
We all do understand that you are
"working with what you got" and making the best of it.
The belts on the engine could be reworked in a
manner similar to what they do on some trucks - the double
sheave and two v-belts, or a set of special pulleys and a wider cog belt.
The torque load with all the alternator loads must be pretty bloody high.
Adjusting the alternator field settings down to reduce the alternator torque
loads makes sense, although its a compromise. After all you are throwing
away some of the generating capability in order to save the belts.
as for the vibration? You got an alignment problem,
something out of round or a something out of balance?
thanks,
jerry
#1961
Posted 09 June 2010 - 09:29 PM
jerryj2me, on 09 June 2010 - 02:15 PM, said:
Thank you for the details.
You have earned my respect.
We all do understand that you are
"working with what you got" and making the best of it.
The belts on the engine could be reworked in a
manner similar to what they do on some trucks - the double
sheave and two v-belts, or a set of special pulleys and a wider cog belt.
The torque load with all the alternator loads must be pretty bloody high.
Adjusting the alternator field settings down to reduce the alternator torque
loads makes sense, although its a compromise. After all you are throwing
away some of the generating capability in order to save the belts.
as for the vibration? You got an alignment problem,
something out of round or a something out of balance?
thanks,
jerry
you cannot believe the loads that these big alternators cause until you see it running, especially if they are doctored to hit 14.4 Volts.
It actually stalls the engine if you run both while cold. Some of our single handed yachts, we either have a manual switch or a time delay before they kick in so the engine can get going.
Double belts we found were not a good idea as they wear and stretch different and do not share the load well enough. Maybe a square tooth belt like a Harley drive belt would be the go, I've never tried that.
Most of the vibration is due to not enough rigidity in the steel mounting structure. Being a race yacht, we tend to not go too overboard and there is always a room problem.
Biggest problem is the user of these boats. Both girls live on all the electronics and never put the phone down. None would survive or make it without a sat phone.
I did a 5,200 mile 2 handed race to Osaka on 39 ltrs of fuel. Sure we only used the pilot 21% of the time but there sure is a lot more discipline to be had.
Media chews up a lot and I suppose they all need the sponsors onboard.
#1962
Posted 09 June 2010 - 10:21 PM
#1963
Posted 09 June 2010 - 10:58 PM
longy, on 09 June 2010 - 10:21 PM, said:
http://www.gates.com...location_id=560
see the picture at the top of the page -
belts are available for whats is globally
described as "industrial power transfer"
in all kinds of forms and flavors.
I don't like the double v belt approach either,
for the reasons others have stated.
This is a 2 piston diesel (correct me if I am wrong)
and the torque of the engine as a function of
crank angle is going to have a lot of variance.
More pistons, flatter rotational torque. My premise is
if all else is well, that's the vibration issue,
couple with the heavy alternator load.
50 knots of wind in the forecast - Hope the weather routing keeps
her out of it and she prepares properly.
Hopefully no more sleeping with a lot of sail area up.
Maybe that lesson got learned from the last go around with this?
#1964
Posted 09 June 2010 - 11:08 PM
No doubt She's done alot and learned alot but in no way or form was this trip well thought out or prepared for. Would her journey have continued if more experienced sailors had not stepped in and helped solve problems? Most PAC Cup Sailors discover these sorts of issues in the months leading up to their 2000 mile off shore race when they do the Coastal Cup and other local ocean events. Apparently the rush to make it happen took priority over the poor kid actually learning and knowing this stuff her self before she went.
#1965
Posted 10 June 2010 - 04:23 AM
U20guy2, on 09 June 2010 - 11:08 PM, said:
No doubt She's done alot and learned alot but in no way or form was this trip well thought out or prepared for. Would her journey have continued if more experienced sailors had not stepped in and helped solve problems? Most PAC Cup Sailors discover these sorts of issues in the months leading up to their 2000 mile off shore race when they do the Coastal Cup and other local ocean events. Apparently the rush to make it happen took priority over the poor kid actually learning and knowing this stuff her self before she went.
+1 - Best of luck to Abby.
#1966
Posted 10 June 2010 - 03:02 PM
jerryj2me, on 09 June 2010 - 10:58 PM, said:
50 knots of wind in the forecast - Hope the weather routing keeps
her out of it and she prepares properly.
The website positions seem to put her roughly at 43S. That a real trade-off between making speed in between the lows vs getting hammered by the lows.
But for today that puts her in a very windy spot. I am a bit surprised the routing did not aggressively push her north for this low, they have been so conservative in the past.
610.jpg (249.56K)
Number of downloads: 98
#1967
Posted 10 June 2010 - 05:04 PM
Estar, on 10 June 2010 - 03:02 PM, said:
While we don't know actual positions, from a rough point of view it looks to me like she made it to the Kerguelens within the outer time estimated on her web site. This is a first for her trip. I don't know if it is routing or sailing, or more likely both, but she is moving along faster in any case. I enjoyed it when Born2Sail put positions in his Nav software - though for that one he had them. I would not want to add any pressure on this teen girl to push the boat though.
#1971
#1972
Posted 10 June 2010 - 05:30 PM
#1973
Posted 10 June 2010 - 05:33 PM
shamrock22, on 10 June 2010 - 05:30 PM, said:
Primary - and personal maybe?
Given they were on the sat phone with her prior to the EPIRB I'd guess that we are only getting a very small part of the story that lead up to this. Guessing they were on the phone with her to coach her through a major fix or how to get the boat mellowed out in the conditions she was in?
#1974
Posted 10 June 2010 - 05:35 PM
2 EPIRBs chirping is definitely not a good sign. Maybe she's in a raft. C'mon little girl, hang on till somebody gets to you.
Edit: The ABCnews link said she had manually activated 2 EPIRBs and that an auto had not fired. What are the chances of that being an accurate report? If true, it'd seem to be a hopeful sign (e.g. she was conscious and working the problem)
This post has been edited by razorback: 10 June 2010 - 05:41 PM
#1975
Posted 10 June 2010 - 05:38 PM
razorback, on 10 June 2010 - 05:35 PM, said:
2 EPIRBs chirping is definitely not a good sign. Maybe she's in a raft. C'mon little girl, hang on till somebody gets to you.
Is topping the news here in LA on the Radio.
Can someone give me the latest for her LAT LON and I will go have a look at the Wx.


Sign In »
Register Now!
Help













