Jump to content


Fundamental Laser Class rule change


  • Please log in to reply
495 replies to this topic

#401 Radial Reality

Radial Reality

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 41 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 10:07 PM

Dude! Wassup with this? http://na.laserperfo...ing-sponsorship
Read the requirement on individuals at http://laserperforma...ion_021512f.pdf
Like, is LaserPerformance United a new Laser Class?

#402 trenace

trenace

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,282 posts
  • Location:Ocala, FL

Posted 16 February 2012 - 10:17 PM

Laser Performance has about 15 different dinghies, not just Lasers.

There seems to be nothing saying that this sponsorship is only for Lasers, or even if it were, that it is a new racing class. It appears to be a sponsorship for selected athletes, regattas, and sailing organizations.

#403 IC Nutter

IC Nutter

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 546 posts

Posted 17 February 2012 - 02:08 AM

Laser Performance has about 15 different dinghies, not just Lasers.

There seems to be nothing saying that this sponsorship is only for Lasers, or even if it were, that it is a new racing class. It appears to be a sponsorship for selected athletes, regattas, and sailing organizations.


Cool. Now all I need to do is to get LaserPerformance to build me an International Canoe and I can get sponsorship too!

#404 trenace

trenace

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,282 posts
  • Location:Ocala, FL

Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:36 AM

Yes, but you'll have to replace it every season, and buy 4 masts to get one that is competitive :)

#405 JimC

JimC

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,765 posts
  • Location:South East England
  • Interests:Dinghies, especially box rule classes.

Posted 17 February 2012 - 10:58 AM

Really weird: its almost as if they are setting up an alternative class association to the class association.

They seem determined to completely change the way the Laser has always operated. The deal has always been with the Laser that you pay a few quids extra on the price of stuff, but the quid pro quo is that there's all the manufacturer support and everything else which keeps the class popular, thus second hand values up and so on. And there was always the tight relationship between CA and manufacturers - and sure people were always vaguely aware there were several manufacturers, but who really cared - which kept things aligned.

Now it seems as if the beancounters at the pushchair company want to change all that. This gives the impression they want to at least partially supplant the CA with a new body that will be completely under their thumb, and which the sailors will have stuff all influence over. For all the stuff Mr Wellmann was spouting about threats from Global Sailing, we're suddenly seeing change after a year or more of rumour, and it all seems to be stuff that LPE/Maclaren Pushchairs are attempting to impose on the sailors.

In his "clarification" on the Fundamental Rule Change thing Mr Wellmann said

If you want to preserve the Laser Class in its current set-up you need to vote YES. If you vote NO the Class in its current set-up will soon cease to exist.

Mr Wellmann, did you know it was Pushchairs inc who were making all the running for change, or were they being a bit economical with the old actualite with you? That does seem to be something ofa culture thing around Laser management...

#406 Tiller Man

Tiller Man

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 47 posts

Posted 17 February 2012 - 02:22 PM

Mr Wellmann, did you know it was Pushchairs inc who were making all the running for change, or were they being a bit economical with the old actualite with you? That does seem to be something ofa culture thing around Laser management...


To be fair to Mr Wellmann he did say, back on the original announcement on the proposed fundamental rule change, that LaserPerformance Europe had told ILCA that it intended to form its own Laser class. It certainly looks like this LaserPerformance United organization might well be LP following through on that idea.

But it sounds as if they are going to set up "chapters" of LPU or "unions" for five dinghy classes, so this can't just be about the current state of things in the Laser class. It will be interesting to see the full details of the new unions when they roll them out in March. You have to join the "union" if you want to apply for sponsorship from Maclaren. I wonder what other incentives to join there will be?

#407 Wess

Wess

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,983 posts

Posted 17 February 2012 - 04:31 PM


Mr Wellmann, did you know it was Pushchairs inc who were making all the running for change, or were they being a bit economical with the old actualite with you? That does seem to be something ofa culture thing around Laser management...


To be fair to Mr Wellmann he did say, back on the original announcement on the proposed fundamental rule change, that LaserPerformance Europe had told ILCA that it intended to form its own Laser class. It certainly looks like this LaserPerformance United organization might well be LP following through on that idea.

But it sounds as if they are going to set up "chapters" of LPU or "unions" for five dinghy classes, so this can't just be about the current state of things in the Laser class. It will be interesting to see the full details of the new unions when they roll them out in March. You have to join the "union" if you want to apply for sponsorship from Maclaren. I wonder what other incentives to join there will be?


I don't know Tillerman but I hope its not another step towards a potential splintering. Both GS and LPE have said they would set up their own classes and both appear to have taken small steps in that direction - maybe - at one time or another. It does seem a natural step all things considered. While its hard to know for sure, neither - though GS appears closer - seem to have all the necesary rights to sell Laser (or at least what most in the Laser class want like new top sections and sails, etc..) around the world. They could in theory sell something that looks and sails like a Laser but is not called a Laser - I think. Hard to tell but I wonder if these are the first baby steps towards that end since ISAF's inaction or blocking of ILCA's solution has left everyone with no path forward under the current class.

Chicken is such a stupid game and ISAF seems to be playing it.


Oh well, guess its just fodder for fools and lawyers. The only thing I am pretty sure of is that they can't stop me or my local fleet from frostbiting our Lasers this Sunday and having fun while we do so. So stick that in your pipe Bruce and get your hand out of my pocket!

#408 trenace

trenace

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,282 posts
  • Location:Ocala, FL

Posted 17 February 2012 - 04:37 PM

Yes, GS can sell whatever they want in the US so long as they don't use the Laser trademark.

LPE may have erred in overestimating trademark value.

Branding indeed can be extremely valuable, but in some instances value can disappear almost overnight. For example, some years back the Pontiac trademark might have been worth hundreds of millions of dollars or even billions, but what's it worth today?

With things going the right way, it's not inconceivable that whether something is branded Laser or Something-else might become fairly immaterial to buyers.

#409 Tiller Man

Tiller Man

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 47 posts

Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:53 PM

LPE may have erred in overestimating trademark value.

Branding indeed can be extremely valuable, but in some instances value can disappear almost overnight. For example, some years back the Pontiac trademark might have been worth hundreds of millions of dollars or even billions, but what's it worth today?

With things going the right way, it's not inconceivable that whether something is branded Laser or Something-else might become fairly immaterial to buyers.


So if you are a company that makes Lasers (and lots of other boats on which you had used the Laser name) and you want to sell them all over the world you need to have a different brand for them. If you had another fairly well know brand in-house you could start sponsoring sailors and sailing organizations using that other brand name in order to establish high awareness and visibility of that brand in the sailing world. Then at some point in the future you could start using that brand on sailboats including the boat formerly known as Laser.

Tell me I'm crazy. Nobody would think of doing that, would they?

#410 trenace

trenace

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,282 posts
  • Location:Ocala, FL

Posted 17 February 2012 - 07:11 PM

Ah, actually I was thinking somewhat off track of where the thread has most recently turned: I was meaning in reference to LPE's apparent decision to rely on trademark instead of trademark-plus-Class-approval as protection against competition with GS.

But your point that LPE could be working towards selling their own boats outside their own markets by building a non-Laser brand name could well be true also, and far more relevant to this recent announcement.

#411 Phil S

Phil S

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,750 posts
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 17 February 2012 - 08:40 PM

Just wondering if the London Olympic games organisers have a contract with anyone to provide the boats for the Laser part of the regatta. Then I wonder if the boats provided will still be laser class legal with ISAF and ILCA by August, consiering all the legal debate and lack of progress so far?
So in fact will there be a Laser class in the olympics this year at all, or maybe a regatta in Laser looking boats with some other brand on them?
Seems like the companies, ISAF and the association are heading for a potential marketing disaster.

#412 Tiller Man

Tiller Man

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 47 posts

Posted 17 February 2012 - 09:19 PM

Just wondering if the London Olympic games organisers have a contract with anyone to provide the boats for the Laser part of the regatta. Then I wonder if the boats provided will still be laser class legal with ISAF and ILCA by August, consiering all the legal debate and lack of progress so far?
So in fact will there be a Laser class in the olympics this year at all, or maybe a regatta in Laser looking boats with some other brand on them?
Seems like the companies, ISAF and the association are heading for a potential marketing disaster.


Good point. As things stand the change to the Fundamental Rule of the Laser Class has not passed (because it has not been approved by ISAF) so the old rule still applies. As I understand it, this means you can't sell class-legal Lasers unless you have an agreement with Bruce Kirby or Bruce Kirby Inc. which by all accounts LPE no longer has. If that's true, then the boats they sell as Lasers are not legal as Lasers under Laser Class rules.

That could be the main reason why they are starting what sounds like a new class association called LaserPerformance United. No doubt the boats made by LPE will be legal under the rules of LPU. So Laser events in Europe will presumably say in the NOR and SIs that they are being run under the rules of LPU and all will be well. Is that the plan, do you think? I wonder if you will have to be a member of LPU to sail in some of those events?

Please tell me I'm crazy.

#413 trenace

trenace

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,282 posts
  • Location:Ocala, FL

Posted 17 February 2012 - 10:13 PM

However, I'd think that Lasers as sailed under LPU auspices would not be an ISAF Class. But I don't know that for a fact.

Is the Class the boat as anyone might call it with some reasonable justification (for example I can justify calling the LPE boat a Laser), or is it the Class organization combined with the specific boats that that organization approves? I'd thought the latter: which is why one can't compete with a non-Class-legal boat no matter how identically it might measure to a Class-legal boat.

#414 torrid

torrid

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 192 posts

Posted 17 February 2012 - 10:38 PM

Ooh, another organization to join so I can race. Where do I send my check? Truthfully, if I live in a right-to-sail state, can they force me to join the union just to race?

#415 I'moutahere

I'moutahere

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,810 posts

Posted 17 February 2012 - 10:42 PM

So what chance of ISAF saying "Enough children", and withdrawing International status & Olympic class status for the Laser?

Might be time for a change anyway.

#416 Tcatman

Tcatman

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,028 posts

Posted 23 February 2012 - 08:05 PM

So what chance of ISAF saying "Enough children", and withdrawing International status & Olympic class status for the Laser?

Might be time for a change anyway.

Nah... all they have to do is pick a builder with a good shipping department.. Make that boat the Laser for the ISAF grade One Events.... those sailors on the Olympic path will get that boat... the rest of the sailors and the Laser class will muddle along while the builders fight. ISAF can always ensure integrity on the race course by picking a builder...
Integrity of the class world wide on this issue is beyond ISAF control Maybe Integrity is over rated and sailors want cheaper stuff?

#417 trenace

trenace

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,282 posts
  • Location:Ocala, FL

Posted 23 February 2012 - 08:09 PM

Ship the boats halfway around the world, then ship the used boats back again, as they cannot be sold in that market?

Ouch, on shipping costs.

And arguably, spending your money largely for the purpose of supporting the market of the other builder?

#418 I'moutahere

I'moutahere

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,810 posts

Posted 23 February 2012 - 08:45 PM


So what chance of ISAF saying "Enough children", and withdrawing International status & Olympic class status for the Laser?

Might be time for a change anyway.

Nah... all they have to do is pick a builder with a good shipping department.. Make that boat the Laser for the ISAF grade One Events.... those sailors on the Olympic path will get that boat... the rest of the sailors and the Laser class will muddle along while the builders fight. ISAF can always ensure integrity on the race course by picking a builder...
Integrity of the class world wide on this issue is beyond ISAF control Maybe Integrity is over rated and sailors want cheaper stuff?


Maybe it's time for a new one person Olympic dinghy , similar to the Laser but updated, carbon spars etc, but not controlled by the builders.

Just sayin'.

#419 Phil S

Phil S

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,750 posts
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 23 February 2012 - 09:00 PM

At least this fiasco might make ISAF rethink its addiction to SMOD classes.

#420 trenace

trenace

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,282 posts
  • Location:Ocala, FL

Posted 23 February 2012 - 09:14 PM

Though the problem here isn't single manufacturer, but multiple manufacturers / split trademark rights, and possible conflict of interest in offering contracts.

#421 Gouvernail

Gouvernail

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,765 posts
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:margaritas, hippie chicks, durable flying discs for retriever dog play

Posted 25 February 2012 - 06:51 AM

The Union thing seems to be all about those who want sponsoprship from Babby Bugy Inc. The LPE website has links to the various laser class offices and I found no mention of anything but support for those associations..

#422 ducky

ducky

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,877 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 04:12 PM



So what chance of ISAF saying "Enough children", and withdrawing International status & Olympic class status for the Laser?

Might be time for a change anyway.

Nah... all they have to do is pick a builder with a good shipping department.. Make that boat the Laser for the ISAF grade One Events.... those sailors on the Olympic path will get that boat... the rest of the sailors and the Laser class will muddle along while the builders fight. ISAF can always ensure integrity on the race course by picking a builder...
Integrity of the class world wide on this issue is beyond ISAF control Maybe Integrity is over rated and sailors want cheaper stuff?


Maybe it's time for a new one person Olympic dinghy , similar to the Laser but updated, carbon spars etc, but not controlled by the builders.

Just sayin'.
+1



#423 williwaw

williwaw

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 538 posts
  • Location:Netherlands, Amsterdam area

Posted 26 February 2012 - 11:48 AM

Though the problem here isn't single manufacturer, but multiple manufacturers / split trademark rights, and possible conflict of interest in offering contracts.



Even more a reason to look for a true modern new boat.

#424 JimC

JimC

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,765 posts
  • Location:South East England
  • Interests:Dinghies, especially box rule classes.

Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:22 AM

The LPE website has links to the various laser class offices and I found no mention of anything but support for those associations..

Maybe so, but the ILCA -NA Executive minutes are quite clear in stating that their sponsorship from Laser Performance has ceased and they see no prospect of it being renewed. They say they have to put together a proposal for sponsorship to Baby Buggies. Surely that is a big change in the way things have been done historically?

My linkhttp://www.laser.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=962:2012-january-excom-minutes&catid=21:official&Itemid=250

#425 Gouvernail

Gouvernail

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,765 posts
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:margaritas, hippie chicks, durable flying discs for retriever dog play

Posted 28 February 2012 - 03:05 AM

The LPE website has links to the various laser class offices and I found no mention of anything but support for those associations..

Maybe so, but the ILCA -NA Executive minutes are quite clear in stating that their sponsorship from Laser Performance has ceased and they see no prospect of it being renewed. They say they have to put together a proposal for sponsorship to Baby Buggies. Surely that is a big change in the way things have been done historically?

My linkhttp://www.laser.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=962:2012-january-excom-minutes&catid=21:official&Itemid=250



Had the Laser class stood up to LPE from square one maybe the thrat of their boats being unwelcomea t class events would have made a difference in some later decision making.



If the NA Laser Class had kept playing the role it served from 1999 until 2002 as the very best promoting and sales tool the NA Builder had
maybe the new owner would have believed the racing organization was essential to its bottom line.



But as the NA Asociation can no longer point to its growing membership and consecutive years of increased boat sales to its members...



it makes perfect sense that the builder's position is, "Who needs you?"



My belief is the builder has always needed the association and still needs the association.



Had the NA association not been disassembed in 2002



or



had Vanguard's management stepped in and insisted the Association either do its job or lose its builder funding when the association quite doing its job on July 31, 2002...



maybe it would be obvious to the new owners of LPE that a well funded, well managed, enthusiastic, innovative, hard driving class association would almost certainly be the singular most important factor in continuing the four decade reign of the Laser as North America's and the world's premiere singlehanded racing toy.



However, LPE probably sees no need to fund an independent organization whose contribution to boat sales is difficult to quantify.





I hope the funding cutoff by LPE will lead to the eventual disbanding of NA ILCA and its replacement with a professional sales and organizational staff who will answer to management who will quit paying their employees when those employees cease to properly gather and disperse the information necessary to make Laser racing the most vibrant and successful it has ever been.



The LPE management might set a minimum membership of 3000 and boat sales of 1000 per year within three years as a minumum performance level for whoever manages their new NA ILCA.



Then again....it seems somebody suggested that as a standard ten years ago...


#426 Ludicrous Speed

Ludicrous Speed

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 689 posts
  • Location:Spaceball 1

Posted 29 February 2012 - 04:35 AM

+ 200,000...




So what chance of ISAF saying "Enough children", and withdrawing International status & Olympic class status for the Laser?

Might be time for a change anyway.

Nah... all they have to do is pick a builder with a good shipping department.. Make that boat the Laser for the ISAF grade One Events.... those sailors on the Olympic path will get that boat... the rest of the sailors and the Laser class will muddle along while the builders fight. ISAF can always ensure integrity on the race course by picking a builder...
Integrity of the class world wide on this issue is beyond ISAF control Maybe Integrity is over rated and sailors want cheaper stuff?


Maybe it's time for a new one person Olympic dinghy , similar to the Laser but updated, carbon spars etc, but not controlled by the builders.

Just sayin'.
+1



#427 SimonN

SimonN

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,026 posts
  • Location:Sydney ex London

Posted 29 February 2012 - 07:09 AM

Can't believe you guys are still banging on about this. ISAF isn't going to get in the way of what really is a commercial dispute. Nobody is saying that the current builders are building boats that do not comply with the building manual. The issue is about a bit of paper, not about how the boats are built. This will not effect the International status of the class.

#428 JimC

JimC

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,765 posts
  • Location:South East England
  • Interests:Dinghies, especially box rule classes.

Posted 29 February 2012 - 11:20 AM

ISAF isn't going to get in the way of what really is a commercial dispute.

In that sense you're right: I think the class association should have had more sense than to try and railroad through an emergency rule change that got them involved in a commercial dispute they didn't understand, and I think we can be reasonably sure by now that ISAF have at least refused to rubber stamp that rule change. They can't actually veto the change finally without it going to council, which doesn't appear to have happened (yet?).

On the other hand PSE (or rather their masters, Maclaren baby buggies) appear to be imposing a significant change in the relationship between the sailors, the class association and the manufacturers in the part of the world where they have trademark rights, and, especially for the most numerous racing class in the world, isn't that of interest to the sailors?

And then this affair is casting some light about the way the class association is run. If I were in the class I think I'd be making some noise about that too.

#429 freddy

freddy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 245 posts

Posted 04 March 2012 - 08:03 AM

ISAF isn't going to get in the way of what really is a commercial dispute.

In that sense you're right: I think the class association should have had more sense than to try and railroad through an emergency rule change that got them involved in a commercial dispute they didn't understand, and I think we can be reasonably sure by now that ISAF have at least refused to rubber stamp that rule change. They can't actually veto the change finally without it going to council, which doesn't appear to have happened (yet?).

On the other hand PSE (or rather their masters, Maclaren baby buggies) appear to be imposing a significant change in the relationship between the sailors, the class association and the manufacturers in the part of the world where they have trademark rights, and, especially for the most numerous racing class in the world, isn't that of interest to the sailors?

And then this affair is casting some light about the way the class association is run. If I were in the class I think I'd be making some noise about that too.


Good luck with the Maclaren sponsorship, they just filed for bankruptcy
http://www.brandchannel.com/home/post/2012/03/01/Maclaren-US-Bankruptcy-David-Netto-030112.aspx

What the significance of this is for LP and the Laser who knows, but it don't look good?

#430 JimC

JimC

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,765 posts
  • Location:South East England
  • Interests:Dinghies, especially box rule classes.

Posted 04 March 2012 - 12:03 PM

What the significance of this is for LP and the Laser who knows, but it don't look good?

When I read it in depth it didn't give me an impression of a company whose business culture is big on partnership and long term committments. I suppose if your core business is one in which the vast majority of customers will not be with you for more than a very few years it may affect your outlook.

#431 Gouvernail

Gouvernail

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,765 posts
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:margaritas, hippie chicks, durable flying discs for retriever dog play

Posted 04 March 2012 - 11:37 PM

As Laser customers our biggest problem has been suplier turnover. There was a ready made customer base in 1972 and still is. We have experienced junk boats, junk sails, bad masts, and still stick around.



These builders too shall pass.

#432 Cheesy

Cheesy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 892 posts

Posted 13 March 2012 - 07:58 PM


ISAF isn't going to get in the way of what really is a commercial dispute.

In that sense you're right: I think the class association should have had more sense than to try and railroad through an emergency rule change that got them involved in a commercial dispute they didn't understand, and I think we can be reasonably sure by now that ISAF have at least refused to rubber stamp that rule change. They can't actually veto the change finally without it going to council, which doesn't appear to have happened (yet?).

On the other hand PSE (or rather their masters, Maclaren baby buggies) appear to be imposing a significant change in the relationship between the sailors, the class association and the manufacturers in the part of the world where they have trademark rights, and, especially for the most numerous racing class in the world, isn't that of interest to the sailors?

And then this affair is casting some light about the way the class association is run. If I were in the class I think I'd be making some noise about that too.


Good luck with the Maclaren sponsorship, they just filed for bankruptcy
http://www.brandchannel.com/home/post/2012/03/01/Maclaren-US-Bankruptcy-David-Netto-030112.aspx

What the significance of this is for LP and the Laser who knows, but it don't look good?


Thats interesting, slightly off topic but 3 weeks ago I was visiting a factory in China that had a Maclaren buggy test room and they were still obviously stamping parts for the Maclaren buggys, although that is not to say they were just making them for the domestic market with the now surplus tooling, although the QC checks were still in place so its not that likely.

#433 bruno

bruno

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,972 posts

Posted 14 March 2012 - 04:49 PM

Doesn't sound like Rastegar is going to reveal a sudden commitment to the class, his bio appears to reveal someone on the lookout for cash cows. Maybe its another good reason to keep Finns Olympic. Laser soon to be made in China?

#434 sprayblond

sprayblond

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 24 posts

Posted 14 March 2012 - 07:58 PM

Doesn't sound like Rastegar is going to reveal a sudden commitment to the class, his bio appears to reveal someone on the lookout for cash cows. Maybe its another good reason to keep Finns Olympic. Laser soon to be made in China?


Haa..! obvious.. the boats will be made in China..: http://www.laserperf...-foils-globally

I thinkt that can only mean an improvement to quality. Certainly, the foils are better than LP could have managed.



#435 Tcatman

Tcatman

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,028 posts

Posted 15 March 2012 - 01:31 AM


Doesn't sound like Rastegar is going to reveal a sudden commitment to the class, his bio appears to reveal someone on the lookout for cash cows. Maybe its another good reason to keep Finns Olympic. Laser soon to be made in China?


Haa..! obvious.. the boats will be made in China..: http://www.laserperf...-foils-globally

I thinkt that can only mean an improvement to quality. Certainly, the foils are better than LP could have managed.


Does this mean that they are stiffer as well?

#436 JimC

JimC

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,765 posts
  • Location:South East England
  • Interests:Dinghies, especially box rule classes.

Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:04 AM

Won't that need another rule change if they do change the spec from the builders' manual?

#437 Tcatman

Tcatman

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,028 posts

Posted 15 March 2012 - 03:55 PM

Won't that need another rule change if they do change the spec from the builders' manual?

Sounds like the builder is now unleashed from the class rule book... SMOD catamarans have experienced this for years...
SMOD builder .... trust us... they are identical in performance..... Class Sailor.....crap... another kilobuck!

#438 trenace

trenace

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,282 posts
  • Location:Ocala, FL

Posted 15 March 2012 - 04:00 PM

Well, if ILCA won't certify their boats as Class-legal for other reasons, then why worry so much about the Construction Manual either?

They have the trademark and are the only ones that can sell the boats as Lasers in their markets. Let the sailors decide whether they want to buy the boats with improved foils (that probably won't increase speed by anything detectable) or other manufacturing improvement; or don't want to buy them on account of varying from 1970-specification.

The boat probably loses more performance from 1 month of hard use than it gains from the foil construction method change. Individual examples of the boat probably vary more from each other than what this change amounts to.

So, is there are a real "equal competition" worry, when there is greater other variability anyway? Unless constantly buying new boats and mixing and matching best parts in the first place: but that practice is a lot more expensive than these foils are, seems to me.

I've always found it bizarre that "the boat can't improve in performance, even incrementally, over boats from previous years since that would be unequal" yet if you want equal competition, you can't be racing anything but new boats anyway. If your boat isn't pretty new, you're already further behind than whatever the incremental improvement might be.

And if that improvement were better construction that added life? Can't have that! Why, that would make competition unequal between boats of different years! It's not as according to the Manual! Uh... actually it would soon lessen the difference, but whatever.

Not that LPE is likely to make the boats last longer anyway. But Gouv had discussed that such changes could be done, but might not or wouldn't be Class-legal.

#439 bruno

bruno

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,972 posts

Posted 15 March 2012 - 09:05 PM

I still appreciate Steve Clark's candor on this topic. I think they ought to allow 15+ yr. old boats to be strengthened up to the level of a new boat, that would really breathe life into the class rather than just selling more new boats to Olympic aspirants.

#440 trenace

trenace

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,282 posts
  • Location:Ocala, FL

Posted 15 March 2012 - 09:13 PM

I missed that post.

That makes a ton of sense.

But it brings in the larger question, Is the Laser Class really about the sailors and the racing?

Or are the sailors and the racing the source and means for $$$

Not that manufacturers don't want to or shouldn't make money. The question is, is the driving force the sailor with his money with manufacturers doing best by best satisfying them, or do those with tight control have all the say?

#441 shaneo

shaneo

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 551 posts
  • Location:whitsundays Australia
  • Interests:racing multis

Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:25 PM

Who gives a shit just go and sail

Brett beyer Aust looks like winning another master worlds . just cant stop the bloke

http://en.wikipedia....iki/Brett_Beyer

#442 Gouvernail

Gouvernail

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,765 posts
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:margaritas, hippie chicks, durable flying discs for retriever dog play

Posted 17 March 2012 - 05:28 AM

Posted Image




Posted Image

#443 IC Nutter

IC Nutter

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 546 posts

Posted 19 March 2012 - 01:31 AM

Just changing the subject a little, the biggest fundamental rule change for the Laser was the introduction of the turbo rig. IMO, at that point the Laser went from being a lowish quality, uncomfortable boat which was at least uniquely cheap and simple, to being just a lowish quality uncomfortable boat. It lost it's major point of difference in the marketplace. If anything, that's when the rot started.

#444 redstar

redstar

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 120 posts
  • Location:Itinerant

Posted 19 March 2012 - 03:54 AM

Just changing the subject a little, the biggest fundamental rule change for the Laser was the introduction of the turbo rig. IMO, at that point the Laser went from being a lowish quality, uncomfortable boat which was at least uniquely cheap and simple, to being just a lowish quality uncomfortable boat. It lost it's major point of difference in the marketplace. If anything, that's when the rot started.


It still is uniquely cheap and simple. Not many dinghies you can rig in less than 10 minutes, and although people complain about the cost, it's still one of the cheapest classes to campaign. The turbo rig widened the appeal because it removed one of the biggest difficulties with the boat. The class is now addressing the other pain points with the composite top section and new standard sail.

The Laser's point of difference in the marketplace has nothing to do with the boat itself and everything to do with the fleet sizes and the racing. I just finished the Masters Worlds - great racing and even though we had 233 boats on the water, it was still a small regatta by Laser Masters standards. What other class delivers that?

People who criticise the Laser as a boat are missing the point - no one sails them because they think the boat itself is awesome. We sail them because they provide the best big fleet, one design racing, at a low cost, no matter where you are in the world. By those measures, no other class comes close.

#445 Wess

Wess

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,983 posts

Posted 19 March 2012 - 11:32 AM

It still is uniquely cheap and simple. Not many dinghies you can rig in less than 10 minutes, and although people complain about the cost, it's still one of the cheapest classes to campaign. The turbo rig widened the appeal because it removed one of the biggest difficulties with the boat. The class is now addressing the other pain points with the composite top section and new standard sail.

The Laser's point of difference in the marketplace has nothing to do with the boat itself and everything to do with the fleet sizes and the racing. I just finished the Masters Worlds - great racing and even though we had 233 boats on the water, it was still a small regatta by Laser Masters standards. What other class delivers that?

People who criticise the Laser as a boat are missing the point - no one sails them because they think the boat itself is awesome. We sail them because they provide the best big fleet, one design racing, at a low cost, no matter where you are in the world. By those measures, no other class comes close.



What he said!

Wess

#446 JimC

JimC

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,765 posts
  • Location:South East England
  • Interests:Dinghies, especially box rule classes.

Posted 12 September 2012 - 07:23 AM

From July US Executiive committee minutes... Seems its official policy for "your" class officials to keep you Laser sailors in the dark - or are you hearing stuff that isn't public?

http://www.laser.org...cial&Itemid=250

b. Class communication: reminder from Lauralee that ExCom members should consider keeping comments on any of the forums to a minimum. This also applies to the forwarding of items to the class social media. There is currently a lot of chatter on the forums about the ILCA/builder situation. Hopefully there will be improvement on the amount of public communication on that topic after the Olympics.



#447 Gouvernail

Gouvernail

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,765 posts
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:margaritas, hippie chicks, durable flying discs for retriever dog play

Posted 12 September 2012 - 02:43 PM

loose lips sink ships. If word gets out about what the Laser Class or its builders might be doing, the Force Five, US 1, Banshee, OK Dinghy, Dagger or Copperhead Class might attack and steal all the sailors.

The example above shows how totaly out of touch the entire Laser Class Association has become from its mission. The Laser Class was created to enhance the racing experience by gathering and disseminating information about where, when, how, with whom, and all the information any interested person might need to join the fun..
Somewhere along the way, the Tool created to serve that purpose was hijacked by people who thing it is ost important that they as individuals be IN CHARGE.

How screwed up is it??

the statement above ought to read.

Few of you seem to understand the mission of this Association is to grow and manage the game of Laser sailing. If we are not doing that we are just sucking sailor's dollars and we should disband the Association. Each of you shuold be using every tool available to disseminate information and make it easier to find us, put together toys, and play with us. Please make sure you take 15 minutes each day, and sometimes a couple hours, to post information all over the internet. Let's be the very most visible and active association and fleet in every internet boating forum.

#448 JimC

JimC

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,765 posts
  • Location:South East England
  • Interests:Dinghies, especially box rule classes.

Posted 22 September 2012 - 05:09 AM

Laser sailors might find this topic interesting. Is there a pattern?

http://forums.sailin...howtopic=139886

#449 JimC

JimC

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,765 posts
  • Location:South East England
  • Interests:Dinghies, especially box rule classes.

Posted 25 September 2012 - 10:57 PM

Also the first tranche of meeting papers for the ISAF November conf are on line, and a reasonable scan shows no sign of anything to do with the Laser rule change. Assuming that the change was indeed turned down by the ISAF class rules committee, I think this suggests that the ILCA have not taken up their right to challenge that decision up to council level.

Oh to be a fly on the right wall...

#450 JimC

JimC

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,765 posts
  • Location:South East England
  • Interests:Dinghies, especially box rule classes.

Posted 10 October 2012 - 06:24 AM

Rumours and Lies??

Featured on S********tt is this page: a newsletter from the Laser Training centre at Cabarete in the Dominican Republic. It starts with some info about a proposed new clew fitting, then about the widely publicised proposed new sail and topmast.

http://ymlp.com/zLl0tK

OK, so far, nothing new.

It then goes on to talk about the possibilities for a name change for the Laser Class! Now is this just rumour and speculation, or is something going on? Something very big indeed by the sound of it... The implications of a class name change are considerable.

#451 Ramona

Ramona

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 96 posts
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:Yachting and boating in general

Posted 10 October 2012 - 07:22 AM


Just changing the subject a little, the biggest fundamental rule change for the Laser was the introduction of the turbo rig. IMO, at that point the Laser went from being a lowish quality, uncomfortable boat which was at least uniquely cheap and simple, to being just a lowish quality uncomfortable boat. It lost it's major point of difference in the marketplace. If anything, that's when the rot started.


It still is uniquely cheap and simple. Not many dinghies you can rig in less than 10 minutes, and although people complain about the cost, it's still one of the cheapest classes to campaign. The turbo rig widened the appeal because it removed one of the biggest difficulties with the boat. The class is now addressing the other pain points with the composite top section and new standard sail.

The Laser's point of difference in the marketplace has nothing to do with the boat itself and everything to do with the fleet sizes and the racing. I just finished the Masters Worlds - great racing and even though we had 233 boats on the water, it was still a small regatta by Laser Masters standards. What other class delivers that?

People who criticise the Laser as a boat are missing the point - no one sails them because they think the boat itself is awesome. We sail them because they provide the best big fleet, one design racing, at a low cost, no matter where you are in the world. By those measures, no other class comes close.


The 2011 Finn world Masters had 306 entries. Not bad for a boat several times more expensive than a laser. It has a lot to do where the event is being held. Glamorous spot in Europe will always attract large entries.

#452 Eric_R.

Eric_R.

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 412 posts
  • Location:New Jersey

Posted 10 October 2012 - 12:16 PM

Rumours and Lies??

Featured on S********tt is this page: a newsletter from the Laser Training centre at Cabarete in the Dominican Republic. It starts with some info about a proposed new clew fitting, then about the widely publicised proposed new sail and topmast.

http://ymlp.com/zLl0tK

OK, so far, nothing new.

It then goes on to talk about the possibilities for a name change for the Laser Class! Now is this just rumour and speculation, or is something going on? Something very big indeed by the sound of it... The implications of a class name change are considerable.


The clew sleeve has been around for a while now.

#453 sosoomii

sosoomii

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 320 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 02:02 PM

Good grief. Either DA is dead, or you guys deserve what you get through total apathy. Is no-one else interested that Laser, the boat that absolutely defines our sport in the eyes of the outside world, may change its name?! Surely not something to be undertaken lightly (will there be a new insignia too?), and a last throw of the dice in all this political shenanigans. I wonder who has control of the newly named design, class and infrastructure? Would existing boats change name, or just new ones?

Could there be a case of trying to have your cake and eat it? On the one hand claiming it is enough of a change to be able to ditch one of the parties claiming rights, whilst at the same time trying to convince the sailors, ISAF, IOC etc that it is the same boat and nothing has changed. It seems to me that someone is trying to open up a loophole that they can use, but (they hope) can't be used against them.

#454 bruno

bruno

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,972 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 06:00 PM

Laser may be about to die a natural (product life cycle) death, but the powers that be certainly have been invested in maintaining its olympic status (if not qualities) regardless of its combined absurdities. Typically, the class seems ready to adopt an improved rig whilst trying to eliminate any performance improvements (never mind 40+ years of technological change, accelerating, hey relevance) in the process. This is guaranteed to fail, the more competitive will feel impelled to upgrade, pressuring everyone else, in short order 90% of active racers will have the section and sail (I suspectbthat I am not the only one hanging waiting for new gear), and the new gear will prove or seem to prove to be fractionally faster. So why design slowness back into rhe package? That would be like requiring the boats be built as poorly as possible, too stupid to believe,... o, wait....

Mr. Usher sounds like a good man trying to do The Right Thing but come on, be the rocket scientist you are and not the mediocrity embracing poltician, Sir!

#455 JimC

JimC

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,765 posts
  • Location:South East England
  • Interests:Dinghies, especially box rule classes.

Posted 10 October 2012 - 06:34 PM

This is guaranteed to fail,

On the other hand why on earth would anyone want to buy a new Laser unless it was the same as all the other Lasers out there. If you take away the hundreds and thousands of active boats in every country in the world in what other way is the boat superior to any number of other craft out there now?

#456 couchsurfer

couchsurfer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,325 posts
  • Location:NA westcoast
  • Interests:...pimping HOOTs
    ...i550 NW circuit

Posted 10 October 2012 - 07:07 PM

Laser may be about to die a natural (product life cycle) death, but the powers that be certainly have been invested in maintaining its olympic status (if not qualities) regardless of its combined absurdities. Typically, the class seems ready to adopt an improved rig whilst trying to eliminate any performance improvements (never mind 40+ years of technological change, accelerating, hey relevance) in the process. This is guaranteed to fail, the more competitive will feel impelled to upgrade, pressuring everyone else, in short order 90% of active racers will have the section and sail (I suspectbthat I am not the only one hanging waiting for new gear), and the new gear will prove or seem to prove to be fractionally faster. So why design slowness back into rhe package? That would be like requiring the boats be built as poorly as possible, too stupid to believe,... o, wait....

Mr. Usher sounds like a good man trying to do The Right Thing but come on, be the rocket scientist you are and not the mediocrity embracing poltician, Sir!




...if they're actually going to produce a reliable topsection,,,that would only be a favor to the class and it's sailors.




...about 20 years late <_<

#457 fastyacht

fastyacht

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,119 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 07:43 PM

Laser may be about to die a natural (product life cycle) death, ...<snip>


What singlehander is perched to take over the significant market position?

#458 bruno

bruno

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,972 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 11:22 PM

if one had said a year ago that kites would evict sailboards most would have disagreed, i think that laser as a brand has tried a number of different avenues to reinvent and extend the brand, the jo richards design was well thought out, but to no avail because of the imho disfunctional corporate and class structure. in mittens word it needs to bk and reemerge sans some baggage. lasers will be sailed for the next 50 yrs, but the class has failed its sailors by clinging over hard and long to its smod model value chain. eventually even iyru noggins will get the drift. agree, i own a laser again because it is the easiest way to get some fleet racing locally. but as the poms haveshown other classes can supplant lasers mediocrity. bite the bullet, upgrade the boat and carry on, how many consistent top ten club sailorsdo you know who have not spent the hundreds of dollars and hours of time to rerigwith the new gear?

#459 dogwatch

dogwatch

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,749 posts
  • Location:South Coast, UK
  • Interests:Racing in all forms.

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:00 AM

What singlehander is perched to take over the significant market position?


The Solo is the most popular adult single hander in the UK. It's a completely different model to the Laser. A member-driven one design class association, not a single manufacturer one design, hence not dependant on a manufacturer. Significantly older than the Laser, having allowed "high-tech" sail materials it now looks more modern.

Not perhaps the most exciting boat in the world but sail-able by those baby-boomers who are no longer in the first flush of youth but actually have the time, money and inclination to sail.

As for what boat will take over the position of a class where a manufacturer can supply a large fleet of charter boats anywhere in the world, I doubt we'll see that again.

Posted Image

#460 fastyacht

fastyacht

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,119 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 11:31 AM

Posted Image
This looks like a Jack Holt design, yes?

#461 dogwatch

dogwatch

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,749 posts
  • Location:South Coast, UK
  • Interests:Racing in all forms.

Posted 11 October 2012 - 12:17 PM

^

Correct. Designed by Jack Holt in 1956. Now with a number of builders.

#462 jimmy kneewrecker

jimmy kneewrecker

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,064 posts
  • Location:A34 - due south

Posted 11 October 2012 - 02:03 PM

Yep- and there's forecast to be over 120 boats at their UK nationals next summer. I hesitate to use the pronoun, 'we' as I won't get mine for another month and have only had a quick sail in one previously. (there's actually a pretty decent waiting list at the 3 major builders for the class).

But it's not about the numbers of folks at the nationals- impressive though that is. It's about local fleets at loads and loads of sailing clubs throughout the UK. It's about the fact that it can be sailed competitively and as evenly as possible by both men, women and youths from around 65kg to over 100kg - simply by allowing some choice over the mast and sail manufacturer. It's about a boat that is simple to sail around a course- allowing you to work on your tactics and race game as well as your boat handling to improve week on week.

You won't find many Solo sailors claiming their boats are fast, cool or any of the other crap we all got to hung up over the past 20 years. It's about quality racing, throughout the fleet whatever your age, weight and sailing standard at local, regional and national level. They even sail them in the Netherlands so a trip abroad isn't off the agenda either.

There's a lot going for them to be honest, just as long as you don't expect owning one will up your street credibility and be as exhilarating as a screaming downwinder on a musto skiff.

#463 couchsurfer

couchsurfer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,325 posts
  • Location:NA westcoast
  • Interests:...pimping HOOTs
    ...i550 NW circuit

Posted 11 October 2012 - 03:29 PM

wow....it just goes to show where the demographic mind's at :mellow:
...it doesn't seem like popularity and high performance will be seen together in one boat for quite.some.time.

#464 fastyacht

fastyacht

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,119 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 04:04 PM

I think we need 25 year olds designing and building boats.

#465 Reht

Reht

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,786 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 04:08 PM

Most of them are out picking up kiteboards, the rest seem to be content to race their elders in old boats. That's if they're even involved in wind sports at all...

#466 couchsurfer

couchsurfer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,325 posts
  • Location:NA westcoast
  • Interests:...pimping HOOTs
    ...i550 NW circuit

Posted 11 October 2012 - 04:16 PM

...as I understand it,,,the youth market doesn't have much for disposable income.
...they sail OPB's,, cast-downs of existing classes,,or have gone kiting.


...unless they've convinced ma/pa that they're the next ben ainslie and MUST have a brand-new designated boat,
,,,and act like an ass

#467 Reht

Reht

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,786 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 04:46 PM

Extremely limited income, schooling costs an arm and a leg (and then some), means people in their early-mid 20's have nearly no disposable income. $2000 around here will buy you all the kiting gear you could need for enjoying yourself from 8-10knts to 30+ (depends on your weight, experience, etc) and about the same for windsurfing. The same money will get you a beat down older boat in ok shape, eventually you'll be putting a lot of work and money into maintaining the boat, which will never win you a large competition.

To find someone who's willing to design a boat in this age category would be difficult unless you're willing to invest a lot of money into it, you'll have a hard time finding a 20-something who's willing to drop every penny on something that could be a complete flop...

#468 Presuming Ed

Presuming Ed

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,034 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 22 October 2012 - 09:20 PM

ISAF Executive Committee September meeting minutes.

b) Secretary General’s Report
ii) International Laser Class Association
The Secretary General informed the meeting about the request for approval to the Laser construction Manual.

Decision
The Executive Committee expressed concern that the International Laser Class Association has not completed a consultative process within their Class with the class membership. ISAF will withhold approval until the consultation process is completed.

#469 Gouvernail

Gouvernail

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,765 posts
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:margaritas, hippie chicks, durable flying discs for retriever dog play

Posted 23 October 2012 - 04:03 AM

Doesn't ignoring everybody who disagrees with whatever the class is doing count as a process?

#470 JimC

JimC

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,765 posts
  • Location:South East England
  • Interests:Dinghies, especially box rule classes.

Posted 23 October 2012 - 04:34 PM

Good spot Presuming, I've been keeping a vague eye on ISAF documents, but I hadn't noticed that one. I wonder what on earth the Laser Assoc are up to now...

couldn't make this stuff up could you?

#471 redstar

redstar

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 120 posts
  • Location:Itinerant

Posted 23 October 2012 - 08:00 PM

Most likely this change is about the new standard sail and top section. Nothing mysterious, the powers that be have been saying for a long time that it will happen after the Olympics.

#472 Looper

Looper

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 429 posts
  • Location:Western Lake Michigan

Posted 14 November 2012 - 05:34 PM

Seahorse magazine has a little blurb that the mylar sail will cost 20% less than the Dacron one. How is that even possible?

#473 Boat Speed Experts

Boat Speed Experts

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 31 posts
  • Location:Mexico

Posted 14 November 2012 - 06:31 PM

Most likely this change is about the new standard sail and top section. Nothing mysterious, the powers that be have been saying for a long time that it will happen after the Olympics.


Yeah they've been working on something for a while.. rumors of carbon are out there.

#474 jimmy kneewrecker

jimmy kneewrecker

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,064 posts
  • Location:A34 - due south

Posted 30 November 2012 - 11:08 AM

does anyone have any more news on this? I understood that the whole shit fight would be sewn up by the end of November, yet nothing, nadda, no news on the KOD?

The only thing I've heard is that the Laser & Radial are guaranteed a place for 2020... who will be building them by then though?

#475 JimC

JimC

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,765 posts
  • Location:South East England
  • Interests:Dinghies, especially box rule classes.

Posted 30 November 2012 - 02:56 PM

Had the ILCA contested ISAF's apparent rejection of the Fundamental rule change I would have thought it would have come up at the November Conference this year. There is a report on the conference from ILCA here.

http://www.laser.org...test&Itemid=213

As you will see it says exactly nothing about either the fundamental rule change or the proposed new sail/topmast. So it would appear that the ILCA's apparent policy of saying almost nothing to the people they supposedly represent continues unchanged. You'd think at least good manners would require an occasional "we still can't say anything because..."





#476 couchsurfer

couchsurfer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,325 posts
  • Location:NA westcoast
  • Interests:...pimping HOOTs
    ...i550 NW circuit

Posted 30 November 2012 - 03:57 PM


The only thing I've heard is that the Laser & Radial are guaranteed a place for 2020... who will be building them by then though?


.......''Laser's'' already in production,,,,very responsive to enquiries,they say their ''laser'' isn't yet registered by isaf,,but how long??

http://www.alibaba.c...e_Sailboat.html


Far East Boat Co.
2002-
www.fareastboats.com

Shanghai Far East FRP Boat Co., Ltd. is recognized as the biggest dinghy builder in China. The goal is to produce various high quality sailboats and boat fittings for our customers. “Even better than our faith is the honesty of our objective.”
In the same year, Far East was licensed by the International Sailing Federation (ISAF) to build the Optimist and now have become the biggest Optimist builder in the world with a yearly capacity of approximately 2000 Optimist hulls. More recently, Far East also became an ISAF licensed builder of the 420 and started the plan to diversify the product range to Kayak and other sailboats.
Far East is also the sole distributor of Laser in the mainland China and serves China’s national sailing team in their daily training and regatta performance.

Shanghai Far East FRP Boat Co., Ltd.
Room 209, Focus Business Center, No.2468 Gudai Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai, 201100, P.R.China
Tel: +86-21-6728 5977 6728 5978
Fax: +86-21-6728 5976
Email: fareast@fareastboats.com

#477 Gouvernail

Gouvernail

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,765 posts
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:margaritas, hippie chicks, durable flying discs for retriever dog play

Posted 01 December 2012 - 06:44 AM

Typical Chinese shit. Suppliers to mainland China because if they ship one out of the country they break all sorts of internmational trade treaties and laws.

But they may do it anyway because nobody has the power to stop them.

#478 smitsone

smitsone

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 03:17 AM

looks like this Kiwi Company http://csparnz.com/c-laser/ is already producing a acrbon laser spar but only for receational sailing ?

#479 bruno

bruno

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,972 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 05:22 PM

Interesting, wonder how he bought his brand back and how much it cost him? Not a big vote for sri lankan outsourcing, his tubes are sourced from kilwells, i guess he then rivets on fittings? rivets on carbon need insulation. still, just shows that the will is the only thing lacking in the laser world, not the way.
though i wonder about the purppose of putting a nice spar in a crap hull, should extend the life of the poly/mat combo a bit by not transmitting loads asmmuch if designed to flick but then what happens to the beautiful laser leech, flutters even more? wouldn't want to change that, its special trademark signature, the flapping leech, then the olympians might not know what to do. yes, we would not want tonupdate a thing as then all the 200k active racing boats would be obsolete....

#480 Looper

Looper

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 429 posts
  • Location:Western Lake Michigan

Posted 06 December 2012 - 05:33 PM

Typical Chinese shit. Suppliers to mainland China because if they ship one out of the country they break all sorts of internmational trade treaties and laws.

But they may do it anyway because nobody has the power to stop them.


Actually, they will sell to the US. For grins, I contacted them to see exactly "how cheap" this boat was. See attached.

Attached Files



#481 couchsurfer

couchsurfer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,325 posts
  • Location:NA westcoast
  • Interests:...pimping HOOTs
    ...i550 NW circuit

Posted 06 December 2012 - 05:38 PM


Typical Chinese shit. Suppliers to mainland China because if they ship one out of the country they break all sorts of internmational trade treaties and laws.

But they may do it anyway because nobody has the power to stop them.


Actually, they will sell to the US. For grins, I contacted them to see exactly "how cheap" this boat was. See attached.


....I'll bet they got a lot of enquiries!! :rolleyes:
...apparently $4200 can get one,,,though they didn't send any production pictures as requested :huh:

..........they say that they'd have to double-check on pricing for a carbon-fiber version :mellow:

#482 fevasailor

fevasailor

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 74 posts
  • Location:Shropshire, England

Posted 07 December 2012 - 08:31 PM

Is it even within the CAs power to do this vote?


As far as I can tell, it's beyond their control if two builders are having a dispute, but using the CA as leverage... Laser would be lowering the standards even further if they removed the rule that said they must be under agreement from Bruce Kirby (inc). BK should have the say over who gets to build his boat, the way I see it. It appears that the ILCA have just kinda taken over the show and decided to do what's best for 'everyone' (them).

#483 SimonN

SimonN

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,026 posts
  • Location:Sydney ex London

Posted 07 December 2012 - 10:08 PM

Typical Chinese shit. Suppliers to mainland China because if they ship one out of the country they break all sorts of internmational trade treaties and laws.

But they may do it anyway because nobody has the power to stop them.

I may be wrong, but I think you are actually being rather unfair on this company. They are the first Chinese company to do things properly, getting the right licences to build International classes. They are also listed as the official distributor for mainland China (there are 2 in HK). They seem to be playing by the rules and considering all the copyright problems we know that come out of China, they should be applauded, not attacked.

#484 torrid

torrid

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 192 posts

Posted 08 December 2012 - 07:54 PM


Typical Chinese shit. Suppliers to mainland China because if they ship one out of the country they break all sorts of internmational trade treaties and laws.

But they may do it anyway because nobody has the power to stop them.


Actually, they will sell to the US. For grins, I contacted them to see exactly "how cheap" this boat was. See attached.


Note the options. Would you trust your life to a $20 Chinese-made life jacket?

I checked, and my current life jacket actually was made in the USA.

#485 couchsurfer

couchsurfer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,325 posts
  • Location:NA westcoast
  • Interests:...pimping HOOTs
    ...i550 NW circuit

Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:22 AM


Typical Chinese shit. Suppliers to mainland China because if they ship one out of the country they break all sorts of internmational trade treaties and laws.

But they may do it anyway because nobody has the power to stop them.

I may be wrong, but I think you are actually being rather unfair on this company. They are the first Chinese company to do things properly, getting the right licences to build International classes. They are also listed as the official distributor for mainland China (there are 2 in HK). They seem to be playing by the rules and considering all the copyright problems we know that come out of China, they should be applauded, not attacked.


Typical Chinese shit. Suppliers to mainland China because if they ship one out of the country they break all sorts of internmational trade treaties and laws.

But they may do it anyway because nobody has the power to stop them.

I may be wrong, but I think you are actually being rather unfair on this company. They are the first Chinese company to do things properly, getting the right licences to build International classes. They are also listed as the official distributor for mainland China (there are 2 in HK). They seem to be playing by the rules and considering all the copyright problems we know that come out of China, they should be applauded, not attacked.


...god ,,interesting point..........they were pretty straightforward that e not IYRU approved

#486 Looper

Looper

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 429 posts
  • Location:Western Lake Michigan

Posted 09 December 2012 - 09:22 PM



Typical Chinese shit. Suppliers to mainland China because if they ship one out of the country they break all sorts of internmational trade treaties and laws.

But they may do it anyway because nobody has the power to stop them.


Actually, they will sell to the US. For grins, I contacted them to see exactly "how cheap" this boat was. See attached.


Note the options. Would you trust your life to a $20 Chinese-made life jacket?

I checked, and my current life jacket actually was made in the USA.


If i had the money to afford a new 'practice' boat, it's pretty obvious that I wouldn't buy it with the 'life-jacket' option.

Provided they were standard quality, I would consider jumping on the dolly and cover for those prices.

#487 couchsurfer

couchsurfer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,325 posts
  • Location:NA westcoast
  • Interests:...pimping HOOTs
    ...i550 NW circuit

Posted 10 December 2012 - 02:46 AM

.....................chinese-made lifejacket...........................an oxymoron!!!!






............if you can remember what they did to baby formula,,,
.............................you can imagine whut they'd do to a lifejacket :blink: :lol:

#488 dogwatch

dogwatch

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,749 posts
  • Location:South Coast, UK
  • Interests:Racing in all forms.

Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:37 PM

Note the options. Would you trust your life to a $20 Chinese-made life jacket?


Oh the drama. "Unsafe at any speed." It's actually a buoyancy aid, not a life-jacket. What exactly can go wrong with a buoyancy aid? Is it going to burst into flames?

#489 GybeSetŪ

GybeSetŪ

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,220 posts
  • Location:the 'River of Light', Tomorrow-morrow Land

Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:42 PM

...god ,,interesting point..........they were pretty straightforward that e not IYRU approved


why wouldn't they trademark 'IYRU'
should be up for grabs ?

#490 couchsurfer

couchsurfer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,325 posts
  • Location:NA westcoast
  • Interests:...pimping HOOTs
    ...i550 NW circuit

Posted 10 December 2012 - 11:18 PM


...god ,,interesting point..........they were pretty straightforward that e not IYRU approved


why wouldn't they trademark 'IYRU'
should be up for grabs ?




............I could see that happening,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,and I'm sure the chinese manufacturer's just -waiting- for the chance,,,,already making the boats!! :unsure:

#491 Gouvernail

Gouvernail

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,765 posts
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:margaritas, hippie chicks, durable flying discs for retriever dog play

Posted 11 December 2012 - 02:14 AM

Posted Image

#492 torrid

torrid

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 192 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 04:12 AM


Note the options. Would you trust your life to a $20 Chinese-made life jacket?


Oh the drama. "Unsafe at any speed." It's actually a buoyancy aid, not a life-jacket. What exactly can go wrong with a buoyancy aid? Is it going to burst into flames?


Seriously? They might skip on something like UV-resistant thread. A gust of wind knocks your boat over, you fall in the water, and your life jacket comes apart.

#493 fastyacht

fastyacht

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,119 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:22 PM


...god ,,interesting point..........they were pretty straightforward that e not IYRU approved


why wouldn't they trademark 'IYRU'
should be up for grabs ?


LOL

They ran away from the word Yacht so fast that they didn't realize--until it was too late--that they couldn't even get the proper abbreviation and had to add that lame-ass extra 'a' to make ISAF. (I'll never ever ever understand why the heck they decided to give the word "yacht" away to motorships with pre-manufactured German or Dutch interiors, paid captains, and "water toy garages").

#494 couchsurfer

couchsurfer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,325 posts
  • Location:NA westcoast
  • Interests:...pimping HOOTs
    ...i550 NW circuit

Posted 12 December 2012 - 03:59 PM



...god ,,interesting point..........they were pretty straightforward that e not IYRU approved


why wouldn't they trademark 'IYRU'
should be up for grabs ?


LOL

They ran away from the word Yacht so fast that they didn't realize--until it was too late--that they couldn't even get the proper abbreviation and had to add that lame-ass extra 'a' to make ISAF. (I'll never ever ever understand why the heck they decided to give the word "yacht" away to motorships with pre-manufactured German or Dutch interiors, paid captains, and "water toy garages").



...funny....totally missed that :huh:
.....to me,,I still think in terms of USYRU,,IYRU,,,,,,Imperial measures,,,,farenheit :(


......literally,,,gas mileage only makes 'sense' to me once I convert the galons to litres,,Km's to miles :mellow:


....I DO find metric lineal measurements pretty handy in the workshop though ;)

#495 fastyacht

fastyacht

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,119 posts

Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:13 PM

I still think in terms of NAYRU.

My first racing book is written in that period.

Attached Files



#496 bruno

bruno

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,972 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 05:40 PM

just point out it is Dec. and I am sure that I am not the only buyer in the world waiting for the "new" sail and mast, fubaru




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users