won't be close due to the chasm in the righting moments
J BOATS J/70 Speedster
#601
Posted 06 April 2012 - 11:43 AM
won't be close due to the chasm in the righting moments
#602
Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:27 PM
The rest of you? ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Snore.
#603
Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:34 PM
does that mean you are agreeing that it was averaging 'up to 6.5knts' in the lesser breeze reported in the upwind leg ?
---------------------------------------------
tell you what i'll bust another one, or at least clear something up .... so the J/92 owners don't feel so slow
the distance sailed, but left unconfirmed in the report was not point to point ( or waypoint to waypoint )
the total was not 8.96 miles ( thats the distance sailed by the tacking boats) it was around 6.6 or less
so the average VMG comes down to 5 knots max, still good for the journey/conditions really
so Furkov your VMG comparo is not so damning provided you are running straighter DW which a longer waterline will allow
#604
Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:39 PM
The boat still looks cooler than anything else in the J/stable right now,
Maybe but 1983 called and they want their keel back
#605
Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:41 PM
Can someone tell me why none of the US based OD classes seem to do the sensible thing and have a #1 and #2 jib?
I read so many comments about this boat is over/underpowered in said wind strength, why not bring a boat like the J70 out with two headsail sizes? If you want to keep the racing close make it like match racing where before each boat hits the water someone (fleet captain/ood etc) decides that today the fleet will have to run with jibX.
I know it's a bit more expense up front but you actually save in the long run because you don't flog your #1 jib and main out as much trying to race with them in 25 knots.
Totally agree with you, I am tired of trashing my jib at big air events
#606
Posted 06 April 2012 - 02:19 PM
Yes, and that's the thing:the distance sailed, but left unconfirmed in the report was not point to point ( or waypoint to waypoint )
the total was not 8.96 miles ( thats the distance sailed by the tacking boats) it was around 6.6 or less
so the average VMG comes down to 5 knots max, still good for the journey/conditions really
The boat's true performance (whatever exactly that may be) from what we've seen can be nothing in the slightest to be ashamed for. It looks to perform just fine for what it needs to do, though -- unsurprisingly -- it does need legs out to do it in breeze upwind. Okay, doesn't look at all uncomfortable, so let's move on.
Accurate, attainable speed claims ought do do just fine. Rather than ones that simply must be puffed.
However, I'll grant that J Boats knows their market and knows how to sell their boats. Maybe it is like how the thing used to be for automakers to put on speedometers going up to numbers far higher than the car could ever go, and for the family car at that... And like how it used to be with these cars, an outside person tries telling the potential buyer that the car they're enthusiastic about won't really go that speed, and they get all butt-hurt that you are saying that.
But at least the car dealers didn't actually SAY that the car went those speeds!
Maybe you need to tell the buyers in question these puffed things, even though to those who know better it says "clearly can't believe what they say."
#607
Posted 06 April 2012 - 02:19 PM
so Furkov your VMG comparo is not so damning provided you are running straighter DW which a longer waterline will allow
thanks - feeling better now
and, I'd never trade J70 afterburners for my beloved diesel
#608
Posted 06 April 2012 - 04:12 PM
The boat still looks cooler than anything else in the J/stable right now,
Maybe but 1983 called and they want their keel back
Funny
#609
Posted 06 April 2012 - 04:35 PM
There is a difference between being interested in design and how it affects performance, vs parsing every word that comes out of a marketing department's campaign.
#610
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:13 PM
Can someone tell me why none of the US based OD classes seem to do the sensible thing and have a #1 and #2 jib?
I read so many comments about this boat is over/underpowered in said wind strength, why not bring a boat like the J70 out with two headsail sizes? If you want to keep the racing close make it like match racing where before each boat hits the water someone (fleet captain/ood etc) decides that today the fleet will have to run with jibX.
I know it's a bit more expense up front but you actually save in the long run because you don't flog your #1 jib and main out as much trying to race with them in 25 knots.
Totally agree with you, I am tired of trashing my jib at big air events
#611
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:21 PM
This site should be renamed Sailing Pedantry...
There is a difference between being interested in design and how it affects performance, vs parsing every word that comes out of a marketing department's campaign.
Thank you, Mr. Moderator. Perhaps you'd prefer someplace quieter.
#612
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:31 PM
I can't believe I would ever say that Clean wrote the only posts worth reading in the last 24 hours. But its true.
The rest of you? ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Snore.
Well, let me try one for the minority - it's the J forum, not the sport boat, right?
So, the boat is being marketed also as a family cruiser - a day sailor for a nice ride.
Is there anything much to this? That is, would it suit a single hander bringing perhaps a friend of two along for a sail, or is it overkill for that? Would you really need crew to run it correctly if you don't care about 1/10 of a knot or seconds per mile, etc.?
Or does the racing heritage or design components make it a little less of a family or leisure boat?
What do you think - will almost all of these be sold as OD racers and fleets?
#613
Posted 06 April 2012 - 06:11 PM
#614
Posted 06 April 2012 - 06:36 PM
The boat still looks cooler than anything else in the J/stable right now,
Maybe but 1983 called and they want their keel back
Funny
Did it have wings?
#615
Posted 06 April 2012 - 09:19 PM
That's the spirit! Now Bite me.Thank you, Mr. Moderator. Perhaps you'd prefer someplace quieter.
#616
Posted 06 April 2012 - 09:33 PM
It looks like it will be very easy to single hand. Large cockpit and reachable layout ought to be friend and family friendly. One of my criterion for any boat really, and until fleets are established, we're all going to be day sailing the critter.1333733498[/url]' post='3661133']
Well, let me try one for the minority - it's the J forum, not the sport boat, right?
So, the boat is being marketed also as a family cruiser - a day sailor for a nice ride.
Is there anything much to this? That is, would it suit a single hander bringing perhaps a friend of two along for a sail, or is it overkill for that? Would you really need crew to run it correctly if you don't care about 1/10 of a knot or seconds per mile, etc.?
Or does the racing heritage or design components make it a little less of a family or leisure boat?
What do you think - will almost all of these be sold as OD racers and fleets?
Whatever I decide, my next boat is going to be a modest downsize for me and must have a retractable keel. Looking forward to maintenance in my driveway without going up and down a ladder. Smaller blocks, lines, etc. all part of the appeal.
One question I have is the carbon fiber rig - any long term issues with leaving that exposed to the sun?
#617
Posted 07 April 2012 - 12:25 AM
It looks like it will be very easy to single hand. Large cockpit and reachable layout ought to be friend and family friendly. One of my criterion for any boat really, and until fleets are established, we're all going to be day sailing the critter.1333733498[/url]' post='3661133']
Well, let me try one for the minority - it's the J forum, not the sport boat, right?
So, the boat is being marketed also as a family cruiser - a day sailor for a nice ride.
Is there anything much to this? That is, would it suit a single hander bringing perhaps a friend of two along for a sail, or is it overkill for that? Would you really need crew to run it correctly if you don't care about 1/10 of a knot or seconds per mile, etc.?
Or does the racing heritage or design components make it a little less of a family or leisure boat?
What do you think - will almost all of these be sold as OD racers and fleets?
Whatever I decide, my next boat is going to be a modest downsize for me and must have a retractable keel. Looking forward to maintenance in my driveway without going up and down a ladder. Smaller blocks, lines, etc. all part of the appeal.
One question I have is the carbon fiber rig - any long term issues with leaving that exposed to the sun?
#618
Posted 07 April 2012 - 03:47 AM
This is not possible....So, the boat is being marketed also as a family cruiser - a day sailor for a nice ride.
#619
Posted 07 April 2012 - 05:08 PM
This is not possible....
So, the boat is being marketed also as a family cruiser - a day sailor for a nice ride.
Yes it is.... Slap a cup holder on it and voila... Cruisin'
#620
Posted 07 April 2012 - 06:09 PM
#621
Posted 07 April 2012 - 09:48 PM
Wait...you can grill using the afterburners!!!
fuckin-a, what will they come up with next?
#622
Posted 07 April 2012 - 10:32 PM
I noticed that on the day NS tested their sails a flicker was present. Any verdict as to whether or not that's going to be implemented in the final boat?
WRT the keel... I must say that I agree with the anvil shape. Upwind the amount of lift it generates compared to a t bulb on a narrow strut seems very valuable. Not to mention how much easier it would be to keep in the groove for a novice helmsman, a group which will undoubtedly comprise at least some of the target market, especially in lighter air.
At some point I'm going to be in the market for a first boat of my own. This strikes me as something that someone could campaign for not too much money while still going fast and spending minimal time dealing with boat prep, moving it, etc. Keep it covered and on a trailer in your backyard in the winter and race the shit out of it with your friends in the summer.
#623
Posted 09 April 2012 - 12:23 PM
#624
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:52 PM
Does anyone know it the J70 will have a single point lift for a crane or will rolling off the trailer be the only launch option?
It has a slick single point lift as well as the trailer launch option. Ill be going up for the dealer demo(I already sailed the boat a few weeks ago so I have seen the single point in person) on behalf of North Point Yacht Sales on Wednesday so if anyone has anyquestions PM me or better yet post them on here.
#625
Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:52 PM
It has a slick single point lift as well as the trailer launch option. Ill be going up for the dealer demo(I already sailed the boat a few weeks ago so I have seen the single point in person) on behalf of North Point Yacht Sales on Wednesday so if anyone has anyquestions PM me or better yet post them on here.
Thanks for both the information and the offer.
I'd like to know the basics on how the control lines are set up for the sprit, halyards, tack line, etc. I'd guess it is laid out like a J80, but they said you never have to leave the cockpit. Hard to tell where the halyards are, and if they go to turning blocks to let you hoist from near the companionway.
I assume you launch the kite from the companionway around and aft of the shrouds? How does the spin launch go with a crew of three?
Also would be interested in the specifics of the trailer, launching, how much the mast weighs, what attaches the forestay to the deck, can you leave the jib on the foil or does it have to come off for transport, how hard it is to rig and set up, how long it might take to go from trailer to ready to sail. What the total weight of boat and trailer is (and what the displacement of the boat actually will be).
Thanks again.
#626
Posted 09 April 2012 - 05:22 PM
Ill be going up for the dealer demo(I already sailed the boat a few weeks ago so I have seen the single point in person) on behalf of North Point Yacht Sales on Wednesday so if anyone has anyquestions PM me or better yet post them on here.
Could you post a picture of the "afterburners" ?
#627
Posted 09 April 2012 - 08:07 PM
It has a slick single point lift as well as the trailer launch option. Ill be going up for the dealer demo(I already sailed the boat a few weeks ago so I have seen the single point in person) on behalf of North Point Yacht Sales on Wednesday so if anyone has anyquestions PM me or better yet post them on here.
Thanks for both the information and the offer.
I'd like to know the basics on how the control lines are set up for the sprit, halyards, tack line, etc. I'd guess it is laid out like a J80, but they said you never have to leave the cockpit. Hard to tell where the halyards are, and if they go to turning blocks to let you hoist from near the companionway.
I assume you launch the kite from the companionway around and aft of the shrouds? How does the spin launch go with a crew of three?
Also would be interested in the specifics of the trailer, launching, how much the mast weighs, what attaches the forestay to the deck, can you leave the jib on the foil or does it have to come off for transport, how hard it is to rig and set up, how long it might take to go from trailer to ready to sail. What the total weight of boat and trailer is (and what the displacement of the boat actually will be).
Thanks again.
Snapper,
I will try and get back with answers and pictures later this week.
#628
Posted 09 April 2012 - 08:09 PM
Ill be going up for the dealer demo(I already sailed the boat a few weeks ago so I have seen the single point in person) on behalf of North Point Yacht Sales on Wednesday so if anyone has anyquestions PM me or better yet post them on here.
Could you post a picture of the "afterburners" ?
EYESAILOR,
I will try but they may be too hot for my camera
#629
Posted 09 April 2012 - 11:19 PM
Snapper,
I will try and get back with answers and pictures later this week.
Many thanks. Any details or perceptions from your perspective would be appreciated.
#630
Posted 09 April 2012 - 11:22 PM
Could you post a picture of the "afterburners" ?
Should make getting to the line when you are late a little easier...
#631
Posted 10 April 2012 - 02:14 AM
It has a slick single point lift as well as the trailer launch option. Ill be going up for the dealer demo(I already sailed the boat a few weeks ago so I have seen the single point in person) on behalf of North Point Yacht Sales on Wednesday so if anyone has anyquestions PM me or better yet post them on here.
Thanks for both the information and the offer.
I'd like to know the basics on how the control lines are set up for the sprit, halyards, tack line, etc. I'd guess it is laid out like a J80, but they said you never have to leave the cockpit. Hard to tell where the halyards are, and if they go to turning blocks to let you hoist from near the companionway.
I assume you launch the kite from the companionway around and aft of the shrouds? How does the spin launch go with a crew of three?
Also would be interested in the specifics of the trailer, launching, how much the mast weighs, what attaches the forestay to the deck, can you leave the jib on the foil or does it have to come off for transport, how hard it is to rig and set up, how long it might take to go from trailer to ready to sail. What the total weight of boat and trailer is (and what the displacement of the boat actually will be).
Thanks again.
I am assuming it will be very similar to the U20 with halyard, sprit, and tack on one side, or halyard just forward of the companionway. easy to launch and retrieve by 2 people.
#632
Posted 10 April 2012 - 03:59 AM
Thank you. Two questions.
Does anyone know it the J70 will have a single point lift for a crane or will rolling off the trailer be the only launch option?
It has a slick single point lift as well as the trailer launch option. Ill be going up for the dealer demo(I already sailed the boat a few weeks ago so I have seen the single point in person) on behalf of North Point Yacht Sales on Wednesday so if anyone has anyquestions PM me or better yet post them on here.
1: What does it weigh? (bulb vs hull)
2: Has J come up with a novel way to protect the tailing edge of the keel when it is being lifted or lowered?
Regards,
~ Varan
#633
Posted 10 April 2012 - 12:13 PM
he's right , when racing there won't be leeward drops
Are you not familiar with leeward gates, Dave? Ya know: Stretch and blow, right turn, right gate....pretty common to have leeward drops in the M24 class for instance, but then again that is one design...
#634
Posted 10 April 2012 - 12:30 PM
s'95
racing no way you will launch aft of the shrouds
not unless you retrieved it that (wrong) way
seen the pics upwind in a breeze why are ppl still saying a crew of three
S.W. Reed
"And when I found that groove somewhere between high and pinchy and bow-down fast ... . With the three others sitting casually, legs out, I let the tiller extension float above my open hand, and the helm .... "
"With three bodies hiking under the single, low lifeline, "
Set
"During our ... and through the companionway as well. We used the latter technique and the mechanics were straightforward: the forward person launches the retractable pole and feeds the kite out of the companionway. The trimmer gets the tack to the pole and then goes to the halyard."
Douse
"The companionway douse was straightforward as well, and this is where crew selection would benefit having a smaller, more nimble person who is able to get low and forward near the shrouds for leeward drop. The clew is high and the foot fairly short, so shrimping incidences shouldn't be common. We did not attempt a Mexican, but I'm sure it would be the better move anyway."
he's right , when racing there won't be leeward drops
Weight
" but our sense was that somewhere in the vicinity of 600 to 620 pounds would be the likely range. Three-up would keep everyone entertained and make getting on and off the rail more fluid, but if I had it my way, I’d want three athletic 170-pounders and one petite or youth crew in the forward position."
_____________________________________________
whats the bulb weigh, whats the boat weigh
it's also high time the class rules re. crew restrictions & any weight restrictions are released
In AUS to race a trailable Elliott 7 effectively ( moderate not-extreme design, 550lb bulb) you would need 770 lbs (350k) of bodies, but don't think this is the upper limit, its closer to the lower
however they have been known to stack to 880 lbs (400k) and in one case 952 lbs (430kg) //// #2 link #3 link
"H sailed at 450 odd kg, winner at about 350 " (i.e 770lbs)
bear in mind its full road legal width 8' 2" on the Bmax levering that lower weight 770lbs , the j70 is not
#635
Posted 10 April 2012 - 12:46 PM
you're right i was talking single mark
he's right , when racing there won't be leeward drops
Are you not familiar with leeward gates, Dave? Ya know: Stretch and blow, right turn, right gate....pretty common to have leeward drops in the M24 class for instance, but then again that is one design...
with two marks x coming in on either gybe .... 4 drop scenarios
one of the 4 is a plain vanilla leeward drop, other 3 mex &/or windward drops
#636
Posted 10 April 2012 - 02:16 PM
It's no wonder you don't have you're own boat. A tactical wizz like you should be able to hold a regular ride at least.
Wassup?
#637
Posted 10 April 2012 - 02:37 PM
WRT the keel... I must say that I agree with the anvil shape. Upwind the amount of lift it generates compared to a t bulb on a narrow strut seems very valuable. Not to mention how much easier it would be to keep in the groove for a novice helmsman, a group which will undoubtedly comprise at least some of the target market, especially in lighter air.
I don't agree;
Uniform lift is key to good performance upwind. That keel will just make a mess of laminar flow.
You lose the valuable end plate effect that a t-bulb generates.
The keel also has to weigh more to have the same righting moment. Not good for a "legs in" boat.
At some point I'm going to be in the market for a first boat of my own. This strikes me as something that someone could campaign for not too much money while still going fast and spending minimal time dealing with boat prep, moving it, etc. Keep it covered and on a trailer in your backyard in the winter and race the shit out of it with your friends in the summer.
What the hell is a kid in his twenties (or maybe thirties by the time you can afford one) doing with an old man boat like this??
#638
Posted 10 April 2012 - 03:11 PM
WRT the keel... I must say that I agree with the anvil shape. Upwind the amount of lift it generates compared to a t bulb on a narrow strut seems very valuable. Not to mention how much easier it would be to keep in the groove for a novice helmsman, a group which will undoubtedly comprise at least some of the target market, especially in lighter air.
I don't agree;
Uniform lift is key to good performance upwind. That keel will just make a mess of laminar flow.
You lose the valuable end plate effect that a t-bulb generates.
The keel also has to weigh more to have the same righting moment. Not good for a "legs in" boat - Agreed, I see it becoming a legs out boat anyways.Also doesn't the increased chord length allow for a wider groove upwind with less propensity to stall?At some point I'm going to be in the market for a first boat of my own. This strikes me as something that someone could campaign for not too much money while still going fast and spending minimal time dealing with boat prep, moving it, etc. Keep it covered and on a trailer in your backyard in the winter and race the shit out of it with your friends in the summer.
What the hell is a kid in his twenties (or maybe thirties by the time you can afford one) doing with an old man boat like this??
Hate hiking off hiking straps.
#639
Posted 10 April 2012 - 04:02 PM
WRT the keel... I must say that I agree with the anvil shape. Upwind the amount of lift it generates compared to a t bulb on a narrow strut seems very valuable. Not to mention how much easier it would be to keep in the groove for a novice helmsman, a group which will undoubtedly comprise at least some of the target market, especially in lighter air.
I don't agree;
Uniform lift is key to good performance upwind. That keel will just make a mess of laminar flow.
You lose the valuable end plate effect that a t-bulb generates.
The keel also has to weigh more to have the same righting moment. Not good for a "legs in" boat - Agreed, I see it becoming a legs out boat anyways.Also doesn't the increased chord length allow for a wider groove upwind with less propensity to stall?At some point I'm going to be in the market for a first boat of my own. This strikes me as something that someone could campaign for not too much money while still going fast and spending minimal time dealing with boat prep, moving it, etc. Keep it covered and on a trailer in your backyard in the winter and race the shit out of it with your friends in the summer.
What the hell is a kid in his twenties (or maybe thirties by the time you can afford one) doing with an old man boat like this??
Hate hiking off hiking straps.
Why would be hiking on your own boat, espically in a class that will likely be owner/driver
#640
Posted 10 April 2012 - 04:19 PM
WRT the keel... I must say that I agree with the anvil shape. Upwind the amount of lift it generates compared to a t bulb on a narrow strut seems very valuable. Not to mention how much easier it would be to keep in the groove for a novice helmsman, a group which will undoubtedly comprise at least some of the target market, especially in lighter air.
I don't agree;
Uniform lift is key to good performance upwind. That keel will just make a mess of laminar flow.
You lose the valuable end plate effect that a t-bulb generates.
The keel also has to weigh more to have the same righting moment. Not good for a "legs in" boat - Agreed, I see it becoming a legs out boat anyways.Also doesn't the increased chord length allow for a wider groove upwind with less propensity to stall?At some point I'm going to be in the market for a first boat of my own. This strikes me as something that someone could campaign for not too much money while still going fast and spending minimal time dealing with boat prep, moving it, etc. Keep it covered and on a trailer in your backyard in the winter and race the shit out of it with your friends in the summer.
What the hell is a kid in his twenties (or maybe thirties by the time you can afford one) doing with an old man boat like this??
Hate hiking off hiking straps.
Why would be hiking on your own boat, espically in a class that will likely be owner/driver
who;s going to buy drinks for the crew ?
#641
Posted 10 April 2012 - 05:19 PM
WRT the keel... I must say that I agree with the anvil shape. Upwind the amount of lift it generates compared to a t bulb on a narrow strut seems very valuable. Not to mention how much easier it would be to keep in the groove for a novice helmsman, a group which will undoubtedly comprise at least some of the target market, especially in lighter air.
I don't agree;
Uniform lift is key to good performance upwind. That keel will just make a mess of laminar flow.
You lose the valuable end plate effect that a t-bulb generates.
The keel also has to weigh more to have the same righting moment. Not good for a "legs in" boat - Agreed, I see it becoming a legs out boat anyways.Also doesn't the increased chord length allow for a wider groove upwind with less propensity to stall?At some point I'm going to be in the market for a first boat of my own. This strikes me as something that someone could campaign for not too much money while still going fast and spending minimal time dealing with boat prep, moving it, etc. Keep it covered and on a trailer in your backyard in the winter and race the shit out of it with your friends in the summer.
What the hell is a kid in his twenties (or maybe thirties by the time you can afford one) doing with an old man boat like this??
Hate hiking off hiking straps.
I sailed with a crew like you once.
Hated Hiking.
No feel for using weight to steer the boat.
No interest in the thrill of water, foils and sails.
Sat on the rail like it was a bar stool.
I think the only reason he preferred sail boats over power boats was that if you get invited out on someone's power boat you are expected to bring the beer but on a sail boat the skipper brings the beer. I s'pose its a good a reason as any. But I really hope the J70 doesnt get populated by all the lard asses who dont like hiking. It will be a very dull class.
#642
Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:09 PM
WRT the keel... I must say that I agree with the anvil shape. Upwind the amount of lift it generates compared to a t bulb on a narrow strut seems very valuable. Not to mention how much easier it would be to keep in the groove for a novice helmsman, a group which will undoubtedly comprise at least some of the target market, especially in lighter air.
I don't agree;
Uniform lift is key to good performance upwind. That keel will just make a mess of laminar flow.
You lose the valuable end plate effect that a t-bulb generates.
The keel also has to weigh more to have the same righting moment. Not good for a "legs in" boat - Agreed, I see it becoming a legs out boat anyways.Also doesn't the increased chord length allow for a wider groove upwind with less propensity to stall?At some point I'm going to be in the market for a first boat of my own. This strikes me as something that someone could campaign for not too much money while still going fast and spending minimal time dealing with boat prep, moving it, etc. Keep it covered and on a trailer in your backyard in the winter and race the shit out of it with your friends in the summer.
What the hell is a kid in his twenties (or maybe thirties by the time you can afford one) doing with an old man boat like this??
Hate hiking off hiking straps.
I sailed with a crew like you once.
Hated Hiking.
No feel for using weight to steer the boat.
No interest in the thrill of water, foils and sails.
Sat on the rail like it was a bar stool.
I think the only reason he preferred sail boats over power boats was that if you get invited out on someone's power boat you are expected to bring the beer but on a sail boat the skipper brings the beer. I s'pose its a good a reason as any. But I really hope the J70 doesnt get populated by all the lard asses who dont like hiking. It will be a very dull class.
I think it depends on how you define "hiking." HIking with your feet under straps off the side of a dinghy? Hiking of a trapeze on a high performance dinghy or cat? Hanging by your abs off the side of an "offshore" keelboat. I'm all for the former 2, but have no desire to subject my crew to the latter one. So I guess it depends. It'd be nice (from my perspective) to have a sport boat class that doesn't allow "hanging" as there are already plenty that do. But that's just me. Not sure why sitting vertically upright on the side with your legs over the side is not "hiking", but I realize its all in how we each define the term....
#643
Posted 10 April 2012 - 08:02 PM
Hate hiking off hiking straps.
I sailed with a crew like you once.
Hated Hiking.
No feel for using weight to steer the boat.
No interest in the thrill of water, foils and sails.
Sat on the rail like it was a bar stool.
I think the only reason he preferred sail boats over power boats was that if you get invited out on someone's power boat you are expected to bring the beer but on a sail boat the skipper brings the beer. I s'pose its a good a reason as any. But I really hope the J70 doesnt get populated by all the lard asses who dont like hiking. It will be a very dull class.
Excuse me but what?
I said I hated hiking off of hiking straps... because I just don't find it pleasant and it's not fun for me - It's why I detested racing dinghies (and why the V640/VX One aren't my first choices for a boat). Same thing for the awful, nerve pinching, style of hanging done in the M24 class. No that there's anything wrong with those boats or that it doesn't make me a big pussy but it just isn't my cup of tea. How does that translate into any of the the points you made? Have you met me? Have you sailed with me? Because when I'm at a buoy regatta as a one member of a team all trying win I'm the exact opposite of what you're suggesting.
And Lee; if I were to buy a boat I'd share the fun of driving with my crew in non-OD/beercan races.
#644
Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:27 PM
On the other hand, I'm also favorably inclined towards canting keels, so maybe I can talk her into Mini 6.5 proto.
#645
Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:13 PM
Plenty of the new sport boats even the older one's sail very well and competitive with two and legs in. If your thinking nationals with full crew of course you need to hike and do a fair number of things to up your competitive level but pretty much all the sporties sail quite well with feet in. Shoot the wife and I did fantastic for many years double handed feet in relaxed racing on the U20. Heck several single handed guys do fantastic feet in on the U20. So this whole debate is a bit funny as we all know you can make this feet in vs hard hike out thing as painful as you like but it comes down the the class and those sailing in it to enforce and crack down on cheating to keep things logical and comfortable.
#646
Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:06 PM
No?
#647
Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:09 PM
Is there a U20 thread somewhere?
No?
Hey USA I've sailed Vipers very chill and legs in no hard hiking in some great conditions with just a couple of people on board the boat smokes along and is a joy to sail. You just work harder when the wind is up like SF 25 when you need your fee strapped down on the hiking straps. As I said all the new sport boats are quick compared to the heavy shit of years past and a wed night husband wife beer can is easily done on all of these boats with feet in and your still going to be sailing faster than the J24 with ragged out sails in the same Beer can race.
#648
Posted 14 April 2012 - 04:05 PM
#649
Posted 15 April 2012 - 11:44 PM
#650
Posted 16 April 2012 - 12:16 AM
Lookin' great @ 4:56
There's some reaching going on in that video, but the portion from 4:56 on looks like fun.
#651
Posted 17 April 2012 - 02:33 PM
Lookin' great @ 4:56
There's some reaching going on in that video, but the portion from 4:56 on looks like fun.
That looks like a lot of fun. Sure looks easy too. Those guys were pretty relaxed. Decent breeze too.
#652
Posted 17 April 2012 - 03:11 PM
#653
Posted 18 April 2012 - 04:15 AM
soon, as in tomorrow?I sailed the J/70 on Saturday right after I sailed the VX-One. Part one is done and should be up on the FP soon, and Part two (the J/70) will be up tonight.
#654
Posted 18 April 2012 - 12:16 PM
soon, as in tomorrow?
I sailed the J/70 on Saturday right after I sailed the VX-One. Part one is done and should be up on the FP soon, and Part two (the J/70) will be up tonight.
How about....tomorrow?
#655
Posted 18 April 2012 - 01:11 PM
soon, as in tomorrow?
I sailed the J/70 on Saturday right after I sailed the VX-One. Part one is done and should be up on the FP soon, and Part two (the J/70) will be up tonight.
How about....tomorrow?
Ed put it up last night, which means J/70 review comes on tonight.
#656
Posted 18 April 2012 - 01:54 PM
#657
Posted 18 April 2012 - 03:22 PM
Looks like a cross between a lot of different sports boats/yachts ie bit j80, bit platu in the hull, bit melges, bit SB3.
I like the size actually.
15.7 in what looks like 16-18 knts breeze with gusts of about 21 makes it a pretty good converting machine with the stability to hold the speed.
What is the EU retail with racing sails gonna be?
#658
Posted 18 April 2012 - 03:37 PM
Is he deploying a drogue at about 3:45???Lookin' great @ 4:56
#659
Posted 18 April 2012 - 04:53 PM
(spin halyard)
#660
Posted 18 April 2012 - 05:45 PM
Is he deploying a drogue at about 3:45???
Lookin' great @ 4:56
Not sure if thats a tounge in cheeck question or not but I do it all the time on my 22' er. Halyard goes overboard before the drop to keep it from being stepped on.. Halyard is of course water proof and floats. learned it from a Melges24 guy.
#661
Posted 18 April 2012 - 05:50 PM
That HD video is amazing, thanks for posting.
Sailing upwind, is that the spin halyard I see tied to the stanchion with a slip knot to keep it from falling about?
The halyards look skinny in those videos.
#662
Posted 18 April 2012 - 07:58 PM
Is he deploying a drogue at about 3:45???
Lookin' great @ 4:56
Not sure if thats a tounge in cheeck question or not but I do it all the time on my 22' er. Halyard goes overboard before the drop to keep it from being stepped on.. Halyard is of course water proof and floats. learned it from a Melges24 guy.
SOP in the Atlantic class as well. Toss the halyard overboard and it will always run free and clean
#663
Posted 19 April 2012 - 05:52 AM
#664
Posted 19 April 2012 - 08:13 AM
Sorry. I was just trying to make a joke. I guess I should try it sometime.
Great way of foiling Somali Pirates too.
Not a bad brake pad, I wonder at 17 knts if the kite will actually want to come down with this technique ;-)
#665
Posted 20 April 2012 - 06:31 PM
#666
Posted 20 April 2012 - 08:13 PM
#667
Posted 21 April 2012 - 03:34 AM
Almost fell for it... I knew there really wasn't a FP. How about posting it here?sorry for delays on my review. It is coming, that I promise!
#668
Posted 21 April 2012 - 10:32 AM
#669
Posted 21 April 2012 - 11:23 PM
fail to see any resemblance to a j24, except for maybe the trailer. More like some cross breeding between the 90 and 22 IMHO.I don't know, I am visiting CRW (not sailing in it this time) and the J70 hull has pretty nice lines, but my first thought about the sailplan was, you have to be kidding me. It looks horribly underpowered. I know it will have its place as the "old man's/safe/family-friendly" sportsboat, but that dumpy little rig on top of a sleek hull has me wondering. OTOH, it's a nice size and looks to be the offspring of a J24/J80 marriage. Undoubtedly things are pretty well sorted on it. But that sailplan looks almosts like a joke.
#670
Posted 22 April 2012 - 01:54 AM
I don't know, I am visiting CRW (not sailing in it this time) and the J70 hull has pretty nice lines, but my first thought about the sailplan was, you have to be kidding me. It looks horribly underpowered. I know it will have its place as the "old man's/safe/family-friendly" sportsboat, but that dumpy little rig on top of a sleek hull has me wondering. OTOH, it's a nice size and looks to be the offspring of a J24/J80 marriage. Undoubtedly things are pretty well sorted on it. But that sailplan looks almosts like a joke.
The boom could be 1.5' longer
#671
Posted 22 April 2012 - 04:35 PM
I guess what matters is how does it do upwind in 22 knots and in 5 knots. I seems to be moving along fine upwind in the videos.
#672
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:06 AM
Anyone else from WLIS thinking about getting one? This is probably the biggest factor that is stopping me from pulling out the checkbook. Don't want to spend several years sailing PHRF hoping for a fleet and WLIS is not generally favorable to small keelboat fleets. The Melges 24 fleet was here and gone quickly, the J80s seem to have revived a little bit, and there are a couple of local only J24 fleets. Does the J/70 have a chance?
Drop me a line if you are in WLIS and are thinking about a J/70.
Chinook
#673
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:30 PM
sorry for delays on my review. It is coming, that I promise!
<crickets>
#674
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:45 PM
Drop me a line if you are in WLIS and are thinking about a J/70.
Chinook
I'm in WLIS and feeling the same way about the 70. Am worried that the Viper in Stamford, IHYC and Larchmont and the K6 at American have a solid first-mover-advantage.... it would be much easier to jump on the momentum of an existing fleet with dynamic leadership. Also, looking at the AYC Spring Series registrations it looks a bit anemic, at least compared to what I remember in the mid 00's and I wonder--no matter the boat--is anybody coming out to play given the economics and crew issues (though i think the 70 is a powerful response to both of those factors). I think there are a lot of people around looking for something more like a keelboat and this would hit the sweetspot, but getting them to commit and then get out on the race course has always been way more of a challenge than one one imagine. Please keep in touch with regard to the fleet development, if I saw a strong interesting in WLIS and one design starts that would move the needle for me. Regards
#675
Posted 24 April 2012 - 03:06 PM
Am worried that the Viper in Stamford, IHYC and Larchmont .... have a solid first-mover-advantage.... it would be much easier to jump on the momentum of an existing fleet with dynamic leadership.
no need to worry, just take the easy option
you forgot most numerous sportsboat class at CRW, Js and Ms were there but not as many as the Viper
it's good to be worried about competition, see \/ \/
" 6. Viper teams that included one AC sailor, 2 Olympians, the 5-0-5 NA champion, Soling NA Champion, Sonar NA champion, a top ranked Melges 32 skipper,Lightening NA champion, Last years Viper NA champion and Pan Am Champions, Australia's youth match racing champion, Interclub NA champion, 4 college All-Americans, Rhodes 19 NA champion, Snipe NA champion, 8x Shields NA champion, Ultimate 20 NA champion, two Rondar "works" boats, and a deep talent bench of amateur sailors. "
is that too hot for you ? if so a Jboat will suit you fine
#676
Posted 24 April 2012 - 05:07 PM
#677
Posted 24 April 2012 - 05:23 PM
#678
Posted 24 April 2012 - 07:48 PM
#679
Posted 25 April 2012 - 02:34 AM
The last thread about that lack of a report that I commented on magically disappeared.What, no review yet? Smells of conspiracy, I tell you...
I was hoping to read a "fair and balanced" review of the boat, but that doesn't seem likely anymore.
It would be interesting to understand the reasons for the delay, but that's probably not something we'll be privy to. We are just the readers, not the sponsors.
#680
Posted 25 April 2012 - 02:40 AM
Of course, it's also possible that delay could be for an unrelated reason.
#681
Posted 25 April 2012 - 02:51 AM
A funny thing may be that quite likely 95-99% of us would have thought the review as written was positive and would have enhanced our image of the boat, regardless of probably not being written in J-speak (jets, afterburners, smokin' hot, firm buttocks, etc.)
Of course, it's also possible that delay could be for an unrelated reason.
As with most "scandals", it's the lack of information that fuels the ridiculous speculation. Being a anarchic bunch, the clues left here only fuel speculation:
- statement that the test ride was taken right after enjoying the VX
- posted review of the VX with a statement that J/70 review will follow
- statement that the J/70 review was in the queue and would show up the next day
- statement that the review was coming soon "that I promise"
- mysterious deletion of a thread asking where the review was
to paraphrase my late father-in-law: I raised my kids (this website community) to be rebellious, I just don't like when they rebel against me.
#682
Posted 25 April 2012 - 12:43 PM
The review is posted and it's well done.What, no review yet? Smells of conspiracy, I tell you...
On to another ridiculous conspiracy.
#683
Posted 25 April 2012 - 01:32 PM
As a side note, though the part about my being in agreement with the Ass from Australia is itself somewhat disturbing, now that we have the actual weight those that were criticizing my and his estimating separately that the boat would need to be about 1800 lb can now wonder how much basis they had for objecting. It's not rocket science folks.
#684
Posted 25 April 2012 - 01:44 PM
#685
Posted 25 April 2012 - 01:58 PM
If I were in the market for a new boat right now, I'd sign up for the J/70.
#686
Posted 25 April 2012 - 02:17 PM
The review is posted and it's well done.
What, no review yet? Smells of conspiracy, I tell you...
On to another ridiculous conspiracy.
I was just giving you guys crap...peace
#687
Posted 25 April 2012 - 02:33 PM
Again, it's too bad that the sailmakers that sailed the things in RI are unable to post here.
#688
Posted 25 April 2012 - 02:44 PM
The review is posted and it's well done.
What, no review yet? Smells of conspiracy, I tell you...
On to another ridiculous conspiracy.
I was just giving you guys crap...peace
So was I. No offense was intended. Only self-mockery.
#689
Posted 25 April 2012 - 03:25 PM
What I got out of the low tech review: The carbon spars are pretty.
Again, it's too bad that the sailmakers that sailed the things in RI are unable to post here.
You mean like in post #384?
#690
Posted 25 April 2012 - 03:58 PM
It's not surprising that the sailmakers would choose not to post. It would not be professional to do so unless specifically asked by the client, really.
#691
Posted 25 April 2012 - 04:03 PM
From what I can tell, the biggest critics of this boat are complaining it's not extreme enough...
And as you described, the boat isn't meant to be extreme. The boom height speaks volumes on who and what the boat is targeted towards. It addresses a large segment of the market, and selling boats is what the company is all about (one has to wonder sometimes when you see a J/Boat design offered at every half meter).
The J70 certainly isn't targeted towards people who's identity is defined by sailing a "bad-assed" design or the snobby yacht-club elitist who won't talk to the former lot of scruffy heathens. It's somewhere in the middle.
BTW, if you want to see snobbery, sign up for a track day in your beloved sports car. The more expensive the car, the less talent in the driver. Generally speaking, people tend to buy their way into a place on the almighty pecking order. With some notable exceptions, you'll NEVER see them in an actual door to door race.
#692
Posted 25 April 2012 - 04:09 PM
Post #384 was not by any sailmaker but rather by a J Boat dealer.
It's not surprising that the sailmakers would choose not to post. It would not be professional to do so unless specifically asked by the client, really.
It would be counterproductive to proffer ANY criticism of a boat that you are trying to become a one design provider for (I know, Captain Obvious here). So I'm not sure why the poster values the opinion of a sailmaker.
So Naracet, what do you sail now, and how many J70's are you going to buy now that you know the displacement?
#693
Posted 25 April 2012 - 04:20 PM
When finances allow, the VX is appealing more than the J/70. To my taste the J/70 is plowing too much at the total weight with 600 lb crew, and I don't think it will do well with crew of 360 lb without trapezing, and trapezing seems odd for that boat. If business improves enough, I would go with the Shaw 650 even given the cost of importing.
But I don't think you really were interested: given your previous responses to my posts, I take the above as more of a snide remark.
#694
Posted 25 April 2012 - 04:37 PM
Post #384 was not by any sailmaker but rather by a J Boat dealer.
It's not surprising that the sailmakers would choose not to post. It would not be professional to do so unless specifically asked by the client, really.
It would be counterproductive to proffer ANY criticism of a boat that you are trying to become a one design provider for (I know, Captain Obvious here). So I'm not sure why the poster values the opinion of a sailmaker.
I value the opinion of Kerry and Timmy despite the fact that they are sailmakers. They've got just a bit more experience than Block. Just a bit.
And pro's avoid this place because it's a sewer.
#695
Posted 25 April 2012 - 05:01 PM
#696
Posted 25 April 2012 - 05:53 PM
#697
Posted 25 April 2012 - 06:06 PM
1335370843[/url]' post='3686948']
Right now I'm relegated to the boats at the community center... not clear why that should matter to you?
When finances allow, the VX is appealing more than the J/70. To my taste the J/70 is plowing too much at the total weight with 600 lb crew, and I don't think it will do well with crew of 360 lb without trapezing, and trapezing seems odd for that boat. If business improves enough, I would go with the Shaw 650 even given the cost of importing.
But I don't think you really were interested: given your previous responses to my posts, I take the above as more of a snide remark.
Actually, I'm interested in your experience to try to better understand your perspective. What you've sailed, your age and fitness (same for your crew availability) and whether your have owned a boat, have a place to store it at your home or apartment all dictate one's desire.
Of course if you have a active OD flieet in your area that tumps everything.
Think you'll find with me that you get back what you give.
#698
Posted 25 April 2012 - 06:26 PM
1335371847[/url]' post='3686963']
And pro's avoid this place because it's a sewer.
Any idea of a forum with a good discussion of something like a J70? I don't believe there is anything on Jboats site yet other than the usual front page.
#699
Posted 25 April 2012 - 07:41 PM
Post #384 was not by any sailmaker but rather by a J Boat dealer.
It's not surprising that the sailmakers would choose not to post. It would not be professional to do so unless specifically asked by the client, really.
And Norman is also a partner in Quantum Sails, been a sailmaker far longer than he's been a J Dealer. Just sayin....
#700
Posted 25 April 2012 - 07:46 PM
Post #384 was not by any sailmaker but rather by a J Boat dealer.
It's not surprising that the sailmakers would choose not to post. It would not be professional to do so unless specifically asked by the client, really.
And Norman is also a partner in Quantum Sails, been a sailmaker far longer than he's been a J Dealer. Just sayin....
Thank you for the correction.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












