Sunday, June 11th, 2011 Chicago NOOD
The J111's are beautiful boats, the mixed section starts made for some interesting sailing.
Posted 13 June 2011 - 02:05 PM
Posted 13 June 2011 - 03:55 PM
Posted 13 June 2011 - 04:10 PM
How is the Tigers speed compared to the J111? Would assume the Tiger is alittle slower upwind pretty even downwind? thought the J111 was gonna be alot faster than it is turning out to be.
Posted 13 June 2011 - 06:42 PM
Posted 13 June 2011 - 06:54 PM
Kent, Al and crew had our number on Sunday but this spinnaker ride was a highlight of the weekend for sure. It was great competing against you guys.
Sunday, June 11th, 2011 Chicago NOOD
The J111's are beautiful boats, the mixed section starts made for some interesting sailing.
Bio
The link to the picture doesn't work.
Posted 13 June 2011 - 07:56 PM
Posted 13 June 2011 - 08:05 PM
Posted 14 June 2011 - 12:24 AM
Posted 14 June 2011 - 01:55 AM
Posted 14 June 2011 - 02:36 AM
Bio G,
did the Tiger sail through the lee of the 111?
Posted 14 June 2011 - 08:02 PM
Posted 14 June 2011 - 09:33 PM
Posted 15 June 2011 - 12:03 AM
Posted 15 June 2011 - 03:08 PM
Actually, the chute is a latest Gen Ullman and it is fast.
Posted 15 June 2011 - 04:57 PM
Actually, the chute is a latest Gen Ullman and it is fast.
Posted 16 June 2011 - 04:22 PM
Posted 16 June 2011 - 05:53 PM
BMW or Kia. Which would you rather be seen driving? To some it doesn't matter. To sum, they don't want what a BMW says. To some, thats exactly what they want and will pay the premium for the brand.i would guess that a good tiger will smoke the 111 with kites in light to medium, and the 111 will be faster than the ft upwind in anything over 8. the 111 is a nice looking boat and i'd like to see one with some good sails set up for sd to know for sure how they go. what's more interesting however, is that the 111 is so frigging expensive, yet they sell a bundle of 'em, and the ft is cheap and fast, and despite years of good od racing, and winning virtually every phrf race in socal, for all intents and purposes it is virtually a dead class. i suppose perception is reality. and of course it matters that one is a well-turned out, properly marketed boat, and the other wasn't.
Posted 16 June 2011 - 07:56 PM
Posted 17 June 2011 - 11:41 AM
that analogy would only be accurate if the kia actually had superior performance in a fairly large range of conditions like the tiger does over the 111. if the tiger had been built right from the start, had someone who knew what they were doing run the class, the boat would be huge. using your auto comparison, hyundai is gaining market share - they now build cars that look decent, perform decent and are priced less than their competitors, sometimes significantly. their genesis is a good example. why buy a 5 series for $20k more? if a tiger had the same kind of build quality, why would you pay $150,000 more for a 111? you wouldn't.
Posted 17 June 2011 - 04:22 PM
that analogy would only be accurate if the kia actually had superior performance in a fairly large range of conditions like the tiger does over the 111. if the tiger had been built right from the start, had someone who knew what they were doing run the class, the boat would be huge. using your auto comparison, hyundai is gaining market share - they now build cars that look decent, perform decent and are priced less than their competitors, sometimes significantly. their genesis is a good example. why buy a 5 series for $20k more? if a tiger had the same kind of build quality, why would you pay $150,000 more for a 111? you wouldn't.
Posted 17 June 2011 - 05:02 PM
Posted 17 June 2011 - 06:07 PM
Posted 17 June 2011 - 07:32 PM
But when the SA family (and Bob Perry) designed the Tiger we wanted a giant killer and we got it
Tigers are cool boats for sure but denfinately not giant killers here in the bay area.
Posted 17 June 2011 - 10:03 PM
In the right conditions once in a while we may get a shot at it, even if the level of our skills is nowhere close to the boats sailing in socal. When we did the NOODs last year we were shown the transom of all the other tigers most of the time... In winds the FT10 is a handful, but with a good crew I'm convinced it would do well up here as well...
Four years later we're still having a lot of fun though, a moment before the shot near Alcatraz was taken the speedo showed 18+ sustained, with reefed main and shy kite...
Cazza
But when the SA family (and Bob Perry) designed the Tiger we wanted a giant killer and we got it
Tigers are cool boats for sure but denfinately not giant killers here in the bay area.
Posted 18 June 2011 - 01:14 AM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 06:20 AM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 06:33 AM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 12:22 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 08:39 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 08:53 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:24 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:28 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:33 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:39 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:59 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 10:05 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 10:26 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 10:27 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 10:35 PM
Dog, I was not responding to your post in particular but the chorus of hindsighters that proceeded you as well as yours. I don't understand why someone like yourself who can campaign and write the checks for a kick ass highend yacht like the Farr 36 would need to even bother with our FT world to begin with. Bill risked considerable amounts of HIS money bringing the Tiger to market and I'm sure he would be the first to admit he'd take a do over on some of the aspects and issues surrounding this project. Sitting at work on a Saturday so I can continue to pay for my Kia affords me the time to wallow in the mud for an hour or two but be thankful for what you got. I don't see TP52 owners shitting all over the Farr 36 on a regular basis on these forums.
Posted 18 June 2011 - 10:58 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 11:00 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 11:36 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 11:44 PM
Posted 19 June 2011 - 02:20 AM
Posted 19 June 2011 - 03:18 AM
Posted 19 June 2011 - 12:25 PM
ah, to think of what could have been...had stevens spent just a fraction more to turn out a boat that wasn't fucked upon delivery (and also charged a bit more, which given how cheap the thing was, nobody would have even noticed), had he not derailed the class direction with his ridiculous insistence on those fucking awful neil pryde sails, had he gotten a few good dealers in a few key markets, gotten sailmakers involved early on to get their customers interested in the boat, there is no telling how big and successful the class might have been. though encouraged by a few people, he didn't do any of those things and look at the sad state of affairs that exists today. there hasn't been a new boat added to the us market in what seems like years, the so cal fleet, at least, is losing enthusiasm (couldn't get a fleet for lbrw, for example), and despite the fact that those of us who own and sail them know what superb light to medium air boats they are, there is zero growth here in so cal. in fact, the participation numbers are getting smaller.
it hasn't helped that the 7.5 was stillborn and the 13.8, despite what looked to be a potentially really good boat with an attractive price point never got off the drawing board. but i believe that much of that is a direct result of both the real and perceived reality of the execution of the ft 10 as a class. despite some really good people trying to do all they could (tim chin, phil infilise, paul macperson just to name a few), the class was hamstrung by hiptrader, a lack of a real leader who understood the game, and by a product that had woeful early quality control issues.
for many of us, four years and a shit ton of racing miles later, our boats are still together, are just as much fun to sail as ever, and in their conditions, capable of winning any race, and that makes the reality of the state of the class even more disturbing. that this class didn't take off is a direct result of the failure of hiptrader to follow even the basic proven paths to od success. a real shame.
Posted 19 June 2011 - 04:06 PM
From someone who did everything possible to kill the FT10 from day one. And you leave out one critical piece in all of this: the financial crisis which has lead to devastation in the marine industry.pretty good summary of why the class now falters...
sadly, to those who read this forum from the beginning, much of the shortcomings noted above were quite predictable from the way the various parties involved in the project made decisions, and responded to problems..
a hard lesson, that will inevitably have to be re-learned by others who are so easily fooled into thinking a low entry price is a great deal...
Posted 19 June 2011 - 04:40 PM
From someone who did everything possible to kill the FT10 from day one. And you leave out one critical piece in all of this: the financial crisis which has lead to devastation in the marine industry.
pretty good summary of why the class now falters...
sadly, to those who read this forum from the beginning, much of the shortcomings noted above were quite predictable from the way the various parties involved in the project made decisions, and responded to problems..
a hard lesson, that will inevitably have to be re-learned by others who are so easily fooled into thinking a low entry price is a great deal...
Ironic given your sockpuppet id. I guess you only bash Bush when it suits you.
Posted 20 June 2011 - 01:08 AM
Posted 20 June 2011 - 02:47 AM
From someone who did everything possible to kill the FT10 from day one. And you leave out one critical piece in all of this: the financial crisis which has lead to devastation in the marine industry.
pretty good summary of why the class now falters...
sadly, to those who read this forum from the beginning, much of the shortcomings noted above were quite predictable from the way the various parties involved in the project made decisions, and responded to problems..
a hard lesson, that will inevitably have to be re-learned by others who are so easily fooled into thinking a low entry price is a great deal...
Ironic given your sockpuppet id. I guess you only bash Bush when it suits you.
I am not so sure that the financial crisis has a big play in this - look at the numbers of the J111 as an example - those puppies cost 4 times as much and they seem to be selling like hotcakes. Given a successful execution of the FT build, delivery and class I think it could actually have benefitted from being the low cost (although not quite as low as attempted) alternative to the J-boat et al.
While I am sure Bill Stevens have been through a lot in his life I would agree with Graham that he is a total asshat and I for one chose to not buy the FT mostly because I refuse to do business with assholes.
Posted 20 June 2011 - 03:00 AM
From someone who did everything possible to kill the FT10 from day one. And you leave out one critical piece in all of this: the financial crisis which has lead to devastation in the marine industry.
pretty good summary of why the class now falters...
sadly, to those who read this forum from the beginning, much of the shortcomings noted above were quite predictable from the way the various parties involved in the project made decisions, and responded to problems..
a hard lesson, that will inevitably have to be re-learned by others who are so easily fooled into thinking a low entry price is a great deal...
Ironic given your sockpuppet id. I guess you only bash Bush when it suits you.
I am not so sure that the financial crisis has a big play in this - look at the numbers of the J111 as an example - those puppies cost 4 times as much and they seem to be selling like hotcakes. Given a successful execution of the FT build, delivery and class I think it could actually have benefitted from being the low cost (although not quite as low as attempted) alternative to the J-boat et al.
While I am sure Bill Stevens have been through a lot in his life I would agree with Graham that he is a total asshat and I for one chose to not buy the FT mostly because I refuse to do business with assholes.
your loss!!!
he's gone and wer're still doing this
and this
division e
Posted 20 June 2011 - 06:23 AM
Posted 20 June 2011 - 04:25 PM
Posted 20 June 2011 - 04:44 PM
Posted 20 June 2011 - 05:14 PM
By talking to him.I'm not sure where some of you get your opinion of Bill Stevens
It seems like the FT10 is the Sarah Palin of sailboats, you either love it or hate it and all around it.
Posted 20 June 2011 - 06:25 PM
I believe that should be: NUFF SAID.Nuff said
Posted 20 June 2011 - 08:04 PM
You got that right.
Posted 20 June 2011 - 08:55 PM
Posted 20 June 2011 - 09:26 PM
You got that right.
i actually quite liked bill and without him, there would have not been a tiger at all. but creating it wasn't enough to carry it through, and his kid knew even less than he did about what to do and how to do it.
Posted 20 June 2011 - 09:43 PM
Posted 20 June 2011 - 10:32 PM
Posted 20 June 2011 - 10:45 PM
Posted 21 June 2011 - 03:32 AM
Tiger vs J111 market-wise....kind of a mismatch comparison since the two are marketed to different segments really.
Why isn't the Tiger fleet growing? Participation is a real issue. Not only the owners, but this applies to crew. Everyone is working their butts off to keep their heads above the water. In these tough times it is hard for folks to get the free time to come out and play.
In the last SDYC OD weekend, we sent crew to other boats to help get them out there. In their place, we had a potential "newblood" owner on board instead to help with fleet building.
Want real results? Yapping on the forum is fun but action is really what is needed now.
Our boat has not missed one single OD fleet race since 2007 (which was season 1). It has not been easy for us to do that.
We have an owner in Florida who manages to get his boat (in the San Diego fleet) out more often than several of the boats with local skippers. That's class.
Quit whining. Get your boats out......let your crew take it out. Just participate. We have enough boats in Fleet One to demonstrate a healthy fleet to potential new owners. We have plenty of interested sailors out there looking in. We are wasting that "critical mass" opportunity.
Posted 21 June 2011 - 11:42 AM
Posted 21 June 2011 - 02:52 PM
J111 was sailing too low, look at the photo. This should not happen with the proper helmsman onboard. I would take the 111 over the 10 in an offshore handicap race anytime. There are 6 of them in the upcoming CYC Mac, I'm looking forward to seeing their performance.
Posted 21 June 2011 - 08:00 PM
How is the Tigers speed compared to the J111? Would assume the Tiger is alittle slower upwind pretty even downwind? thought the J111 was gonna be alot faster than it is turning out to be.
Really? I'm no brain surgeon, but isn't the Tiger half the weight with almost identical DW sail area?
Posted 22 June 2011 - 05:34 AM
Posted 23 June 2011 - 01:08 PM
Posted 23 June 2011 - 01:46 PM
Posted 23 June 2011 - 06:25 PM
Grumpy, you are such an ass hat. There is not any OD class that doesn't have it's issues. What will never change is that the boat does what it was advertised to do. It is Fast, Fun and Affordable. Could it have been better, yes. But it is what it is, now go stick your head up Dopey's ass.
Posted 23 June 2011 - 07:19 PM
Grumpy, you are such an ass hat. There is not any OD class that doesn't have it's issues. What will never change is that the boat does what it was advertised to do. It is Fast, Fun and Affordable. Could it have been better, yes. But it is what it is, now go stick your head up Dopey's ass.
I am never sure what people mean by "Could have been better" or similar statements because it is unclear what people are referring to or think should have been done differently and seems to imply that there is some major fundamental problem with the boat - which is not true and which (most) people making the statements did not intend to convey. The hull and rig are great. There have been some things that needed to be changed from the original build which were resolved before most of the boats were delivered - like the original motor door design and transom- and subsequent modifications like installing a piece G10 to reinforce the mast base. But those issues were resolved and are in the past.
If "could have been better" people are referring to the OEM furler, OME rudder, and OEM halyards, I understand what you are talking about but those are issues that are relatively easy to resolve (from the technology perspective; not so much from the perspective that there is unanimous agreememnt among the owners regarding the rudder). The Class has been addressing these issues. But there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the OEM platform.
Posted 06 July 2011 - 02:46 PM
... the mixed section starts made for some interesting sailing.
Posted 06 July 2011 - 03:39 PM
Posted 24 July 2011 - 03:30 AM
Posted 24 July 2011 - 01:31 PM
We could have had a faceoff between Red Stripe and a J/111 today but FT10inCT was skeeeeeered to come out and race us...
Posted 25 July 2011 - 02:43 AM
We could have had a faceoff between Red Stripe and a J/111 today but FT10inCT was skeeeeeered to come out and race us...
As golf great Ty Webb said, "A donut without a hole isn't a donut...it's a danish...," a race with no crew isn't a race. Will hope to give you a smack down another time.
Posted 25 July 2011 - 06:02 PM
Posted 26 July 2011 - 12:02 AM
We could have had a faceoff between Red Stripe and a J/111 today but FT10inCT was skeeeeeered to come out and race us...
As golf great Ty Webb said, "A donut without a hole isn't a donut...it's a danish...," a race with no crew isn't a race. Will hope to give you a smack down another time.
Any word on whether the frost point series is gonna happen? 3 boats each from CPYC, PYC and SHYC? Partnership, Afterglow & Storm vs. Red Stripe, Loki & Threebeans vs. Cabady, Venturesome & Resolute. I can dream right?
Posted 26 July 2011 - 01:54 AM
Posted 27 July 2011 - 03:11 PM
We could have had a faceoff between Red Stripe and a J/111 today but FT10inCT was skeeeeeered to come out and race us...
As golf great Ty Webb said, "A donut without a hole isn't a donut...it's a danish...," a race with no crew isn't a race. Will hope to give you a smack down another time.
Posted 27 July 2011 - 05:00 PM
Posted 27 July 2011 - 07:40 PM
We could have had a faceoff between Red Stripe and a J/111 today but FT10inCT was skeeeeeered to come out and race us...
As golf great Ty Webb said, "A donut without a hole isn't a donut...it's a danish...," a race with no crew isn't a race. Will hope to give you a smack down another time.
I was bummed you couldn't make it. We were looking forward to sailing the viper against an actual sport boat. It's just as well the RC decided to make the whole regatta a useless crap shoot by running a second race in zero wind.
Posted 28 July 2011 - 11:58 AM
We could have had a faceoff between Red Stripe and a J/111 today but FT10inCT was skeeeeeered to come out and race us...
As golf great Ty Webb said, "A donut without a hole isn't a donut...it's a danish...," a race with no crew isn't a race. Will hope to give you a smack down another time.
I was bummed you couldn't make it. We were looking forward to sailing the viper against an actual sport boat. It's just as well the RC decided to make the whole regatta a useless crap shoot by running a second race in zero wind.
How do you figure it was RC fault? There was breeze in the second race if you could see it. It looked to us like the first DIV A boat did a gybe set and everyone followed the leader left. We stayed right and did fine. Had breeze all the way down.
Posted 28 July 2011 - 12:02 PM
Mike, sorry we missed you - would have been great fun.
On the 2nd race you looked like you were moving on the fleet once you got the kite up - that thing looked huge!
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users