Jump to content


New 42 Footer IRC Yacht Coming?


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1 Rather_Be_Sailing

Rather_Be_Sailing

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 36 posts
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Stuff.

Posted 01 September 2011 - 09:48 AM

Rumour has it that a chinese company have picked up the tooling for the Luctor 42.

With the low labour costs and if they make some sensible materials decisions to reduce cost and add a little weight they might be able to pop these bad boys out pretty cheaply.

They should certainly be able to produce a fast 42 footer and get a price lower than the Soto40, Ker40 etc etc.

Will we see a "brand new" keenly priced IRC 42 out soon or will this one die like many of the projects that never get going?

#2 Finals Dodger

Finals Dodger

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 62 posts
  • Location:Europe

Posted 01 September 2011 - 11:02 AM

Was Seawolf a Luctor 42? Looked the shit but wasn't exactly a world beater.

#3 Gorn FRANTIC!!

Gorn FRANTIC!!

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,640 posts
  • Location:Lake Macquarie, Australia

Posted 01 September 2011 - 11:11 AM

I think Seawolf was/is a Lutra 42. NFI what/if any difference between a Luctor or Lutra 42. But from the results I've seen they do seem to back up your summation of it's performance.

#4 tuf-luf

tuf-luf

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,571 posts
  • Location:xyz

Posted 01 September 2011 - 11:21 AM

Here we go again...brace yourselves for the China-haters.

I think it's cool news and hope we see shitloads of them on the Asian Circuit!

#5 Left Hook

Left Hook

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,331 posts

Posted 01 September 2011 - 11:37 AM

This is the same boat as Big Booty? The Lutra 42 that started life as Seawolf?

Good luck to them. The boat has not set the world on fire here in the US despite participating in some serious IRC regattas with talented crew. It looks cool and is a good idea but it just hasn't found it's stride yet.

#6 Rather_Be_Sailing

Rather_Be_Sailing

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 36 posts
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Stuff.

Posted 01 September 2011 - 01:04 PM

yeah it is seawolf - the one and only version of this yacht thus far.

Lutra are the designers

Luctor are the builders - or the "brand" or managers of the builders.

Would be an awesome boat if they can make a few alterations to target IRC even more. No need for full carbon etc... target weight of maybe 4500-4800 instead of 4200.

It would be great if they pop these out for a decent price. Build cost in europe was probably about EURO 250k - 350k but with Chinese labour and less carbon I reckon that could be as low as 120k... maybe lower...

Sale price of 220k ex sails & electronics... bargain! they'd sell lot hot cakes.

#7 lydia

lydia

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,146 posts

Posted 01 September 2011 - 01:09 PM

yeah it is seawolf - the one and only version of this yacht thus far.

Lutra are the designers

Luctor are the builders - or the "brand" or managers of the builders.

Would be an awesome boat if they can make a few alterations to target IRC even more. No need for full carbon etc... target weight of maybe 4500-4800 instead of 4200.

It would be great if they pop these out for a decent price. Build cost in europe was probably about EURO 250k - 350k but with Chinese labour and less carbon I reckon that could be as low as 120k... maybe lower...

Sale price of 220k ex sails & electronics... bargain! they'd sell lot hot cakes.

Is any GP 42 based boat any good?


On another point what is the story on the Lutra boats Tonnerre de Beskens and Formidable 3?

#8 Rather_Be_Sailing

Rather_Be_Sailing

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 36 posts
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Stuff.

Posted 01 September 2011 - 01:25 PM

Is any GP 42 based boat any good?


On another point what is the story on the Lutra boats Tonnerre de Beskens and Formidable 3?



Any good?

I would say they are. But I am biased. I like fast boats instead of heavy IRC cruisers. Whether they are any good for IRC is another matter.

I thought one of the OYSTERCATCHERS was a modified GP42 type thing and it won something?
Seawolf didn't do too badly in a few events, not a total waste.
"Near Miss" (modified GP42) won a couple of things in IRC mode in the Med.

You can't write them off totally in IRC.

The point is they are fast and you would hope that using the same hull shape they could be very fast and win the odd piece of tin.


Not sure of any story with Tonnerre

#9 tuf-luf

tuf-luf

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,571 posts
  • Location:xyz

Posted 01 September 2011 - 01:35 PM

yeah it is seawolf - the one and only version of this yacht thus far.

Lutra are the designers

Luctor are the builders - or the "brand" or managers of the builders.

Would be an awesome boat if they can make a few alterations to target IRC even more. No need for full carbon etc... target weight of maybe 4500-4800 instead of 4200.

It would be great if they pop these out for a decent price. Build cost in europe was probably about EURO 250k - 350k but with Chinese labour and less carbon I reckon that could be as low as 120k... maybe lower...

Sale price of 220k ex sails & electronics... bargain! they'd sell lot hot cakes.


Labour on the China Eastern seaboard (i.e. where boats are being built) ins't exactly that cheap anymore (compared to even only 5 years ago).

Foxconn (Apple component mfg'r) has started moving factories to Central China as they simply cannot meet their margin targets anymore with rapidly rising S. China labour costs.

China is a market of many massive markets (or city clusters...eg: Pearl RIver Delta) with highly varied industries driving each (eg: Shanghai & surrounding = banking + automotive...Shenzhen & surrounding = clothing/fashion/electronics mfg). Remember...China has 150 cities with >1,000,000 population.

Point being, while it is indeed cheaper to built yachts in China, than in N America/Europe, for now, this will not last for much longer. At least quality yacht building (like McConaghy China) cannot be considered notably cheaper for much longer unless they move their facility to the interior and keep training cheaper, local hires.

Fascinating to watch the sheer pace of it all. Very frustrating for business. A nightmare market in which to recruit (voice of experience here).

#10 Beau.Vrolyk

Beau.Vrolyk

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,269 posts
  • Location:San Francisco & Santa Cruz
  • Interests:Sailing on any and everything that floats. Skiing when the rainfall turns semi-solid and white.

Posted 01 September 2011 - 02:48 PM


yeah it is seawolf - the one and only version of this yacht thus far.

Lutra are the designers

Luctor are the builders - or the "brand" or managers of the builders.

Would be an awesome boat if they can make a few alterations to target IRC even more. No need for full carbon etc... target weight of maybe 4500-4800 instead of 4200.

It would be great if they pop these out for a decent price. Build cost in europe was probably about EURO 250k - 350k but with Chinese labour and less carbon I reckon that could be as low as 120k... maybe lower...

Sale price of 220k ex sails & electronics... bargain! they'd sell lot hot cakes.


Labour on the China Eastern seaboard (i.e. where boats are being built) ins't exactly that cheap anymore (compared to even only 5 years ago).

Foxconn (Apple component mfg'r) has started moving factories to Central China as they simply cannot meet their margin targets anymore with rapidly rising S. China labour costs.

China is a market of many massive markets (or city clusters...eg: Pearl RIver Delta) with highly varied industries driving each (eg: Shanghai & surrounding = banking + automotive...Shenzhen & surrounding = clothing/fashion/electronics mfg). Remember...China has 150 cities with >1,000,000 population.

Point being, while it is indeed cheaper to built yachts in China, than in N America/Europe, for now, this will not last for much longer. At least quality yacht building (like McConaghy China) cannot be considered notably cheaper for much longer unless they move their facility to the interior and keep training cheaper, local hires.

Fascinating to watch the sheer pace of it all. Very frustrating for business. A nightmare market in which to recruit (voice of experience here).


A good friend once said: "The free flow of capital ultimately ruins all great markets." This will prove true in China soon, and is just starting in Viet Nam. Opening their economies to massive capital in-flows will drive up production but also prices. For a time, the fact that prices don't rise as fast as production gives the target country a competitive advantage, but in time (and in the case of China it's not much longer) the prices will catch up.

There is a micro example here in Santa Cruz where it used to be really cheap to build boats in chicken coops. Labor costs and environmental costs eventually drove out the boat builders, the price got too high. This is happening in parts of China now, at a rapid rate, as it happened in the UK in the early 20th century.

The only response, for a business is to change geography or control costs though a close "relationship" with the government, something that is generally illegal in the US. For a company, this works, for the labor pool, not so great. My guess is that China will have a labor cost advantage until its labor population can establish its own "relationship" with the government, which we call democracy here in the US. Then the true environmental costs, along with various other costs, will be carried by the businesses and prices will rise quickly. (as they are now) I'm guessing that'll take 10 to 20 more years.

BV

#11 mad

mad

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,072 posts

Posted 01 September 2011 - 02:54 PM

Here we go again...brace yourselves for the China-haters.

I think it's cool news and hope we see shitloads of them on the Asian Circuit!

Uh Urm, cough, cough

FTA exists so a bunch of cunts can squawk about their nasty little fragile rockets.

B)

#12 Left Hook

Left Hook

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,331 posts

Posted 01 September 2011 - 03:24 PM

I'm sure Doghouse will be along shortly to offer his opinion on the boat....

#13 The Advocate

The Advocate

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,360 posts
  • Location:32.00.13 S 115.50.73 E

Posted 01 September 2011 - 08:30 PM

Good, I generally like what he has to say.

But at the moment it's just another bit of vapourware until they pop boats outs.

#14 tuf-luf

tuf-luf

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,571 posts
  • Location:xyz

Posted 02 September 2011 - 02:05 AM



yeah it is seawolf - the one and only version of this yacht thus far.

Lutra are the designers

Luctor are the builders - or the "brand" or managers of the builders.

Would be an awesome boat if they can make a few alterations to target IRC even more. No need for full carbon etc... target weight of maybe 4500-4800 instead of 4200.

It would be great if they pop these out for a decent price. Build cost in europe was probably about EURO 250k - 350k but with Chinese labour and less carbon I reckon that could be as low as 120k... maybe lower...

Sale price of 220k ex sails & electronics... bargain! they'd sell lot hot cakes.


Labour on the China Eastern seaboard (i.e. where boats are being built) ins't exactly that cheap anymore (compared to even only 5 years ago).

Foxconn (Apple component mfg'r) has started moving factories to Central China as they simply cannot meet their margin targets anymore with rapidly rising S. China labour costs.

China is a market of many massive markets (or city clusters...eg: Pearl RIver Delta) with highly varied industries driving each (eg: Shanghai & surrounding = banking + automotive...Shenzhen & surrounding = clothing/fashion/electronics mfg). Remember...China has 150 cities with >1,000,000 population.

Point being, while it is indeed cheaper to built yachts in China, than in N America/Europe, for now, this will not last for much longer. At least quality yacht building (like McConaghy China) cannot be considered notably cheaper for much longer unless they move their facility to the interior and keep training cheaper, local hires.

Fascinating to watch the sheer pace of it all. Very frustrating for business. A nightmare market in which to recruit (voice of experience here).


A good friend once said: "The free flow of capital ultimately ruins all great markets." This will prove true in China soon, and is just starting in Viet Nam. Opening their economies to massive capital in-flows will drive up production but also prices. For a time, the fact that prices don't rise as fast as production gives the target country a competitive advantage, but in time (and in the case of China it's not much longer) the prices will catch up.

There is a micro example here in Santa Cruz where it used to be really cheap to build boats in chicken coops. Labor costs and environmental costs eventually drove out the boat builders, the price got too high. This is happening in parts of China now, at a rapid rate, as it happened in the UK in the early 20th century.

The only response, for a business is to change geography or control costs though a close "relationship" with the government, something that is generally illegal in the US. For a company, this works, for the labor pool, not so great. My guess is that China will have a labor cost advantage until its labor population can establish its own "relationship" with the government, which we call democracy here in the US. Then the true environmental costs, along with various other costs, will be carried by the businesses and prices will rise quickly. (as they are now) I'm guessing that'll take 10 to 20 more years.

BV


Very interesting commentary Beau. I'm guessing the rough timeframe for your Santa Cruz example was, oh mid-'70s?

Your thoughts on relationships with the government are intruinging, and quite real. Building this with the Chinese government is very, very challenging though (you already know this, by the sounds of things) unless you are aligned with and contributing to their larger macro-economic agendas, many of which are focused on improving China overall - both for its people and for its global rise in economic stature.

Unfortunately, building racing/cruising yachts/power boats doesn't fit into any of the larger macro-economic focal "buckets" most of which include: modernizing their banking/financial systems; dramatically raising health-care and education standards; nationalizing rail/transport systems; while overall trying to reduce/penalizecorruption and dealing with urban congestion. Telecoms modernization has already largely taken place.

China's government (and its regulatory policy) is so selfishly biased towards profit/cash-flows ending up in Chinese hands that it makes FDI a real challenege. The idea of making squillions from the massively expanding middle/upper classes in China has proven to be a fallacy in many industries with the price of gaining entry and traction very, very high (think GE and locomotive engine technology here, as an excellent example).

The only thing that will make yacht-nuilding viable in the long term in China, in my opinion, is through the ongoing/expanding local consumption of luxury items from those massively expanding middle/upper classes. A yacht is just one of many "tick-in-a-box" that newly wealthy Chinese nationals must have. This is driven very much by an "out-do-my-neighbor" mentality unfortunately, as this will end up in hundreds upon hundreds of boats sitting rotting in marinas.

It's amazing how rapidly - and visibly - the consumption behavior has changed in China in even barely 5 years. In mid-2000s I struggled to see any real diversity of European cars on the roads in Beijing (except for the ton of Volkswagen Santanas that were built locally). Then came the locally made Buicks (now largely disappearing) and then the Audis and now Mercs, BMWs, Volvos etc, which can be seen everywhere now. But more notable is the sudden arrival of Porsches, Ferraris, Jaguars, Hummers, Aston Martins, Maseratis and so on in the past 5 years...and, sadly, the almost total disappearance of bicycles. Incredible.

But now I am rambling...great discussion though!

#15 gimmee

gimmee

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 380 posts

Posted 02 September 2011 - 03:28 AM




yeah it is seawolf - the one and only version of this yacht thus far.

Lutra are the designers

Luctor are the builders - or the "brand" or managers of the builders.

Would be an awesome boat if they can make a few alterations to target IRC even more. No need for full carbon etc... target weight of maybe 4500-4800 instead of 4200.

It would be great if they pop these out for a decent price. Build cost in europe was probably about EURO 250k - 350k but with Chinese labour and less carbon I reckon that could be as low as 120k... maybe lower...

Sale price of 220k ex sails & electronics... bargain! they'd sell lot hot cakes.


Labour on the China Eastern seaboard (i.e. where boats are being built) ins't exactly that cheap anymore (compared to even only 5 years ago).

Foxconn (Apple component mfg'r) has started moving factories to Central China as they simply cannot meet their margin targets anymore with rapidly rising S. China labour costs.

China is a market of many massive markets (or city clusters...eg: Pearl RIver Delta) with highly varied industries driving each (eg: Shanghai & surrounding = banking + automotive...Shenzhen & surrounding = clothing/fashion/electronics mfg). Remember...China has 150 cities with >1,000,000 population.

Point being, while it is indeed cheaper to built yachts in China, than in N America/Europe, for now, this will not last for much longer. At least quality yacht building (like McConaghy China) cannot be considered notably cheaper for much longer unless they move their facility to the interior and keep training cheaper, local hires.

Fascinating to watch the sheer pace of it all. Very frustrating for business. A nightmare market in which to recruit (voice of experience here).


A good friend once said: "The free flow of capital ultimately ruins all great markets." This will prove true in China soon, and is just starting in Viet Nam. Opening their economies to massive capital in-flows will drive up production but also prices. For a time, the fact that prices don't rise as fast as production gives the target country a competitive advantage, but in time (and in the case of China it's not much longer) the prices will catch up.

There is a micro example here in Santa Cruz where it used to be really cheap to build boats in chicken coops. Labor costs and environmental costs eventually drove out the boat builders, the price got too high. This is happening in parts of China now, at a rapid rate, as it happened in the UK in the early 20th century.

The only response, for a business is to change geography or control costs though a close "relationship" with the government, something that is generally illegal in the US. For a company, this works, for the labor pool, not so great. My guess is that China will have a labor cost advantage until its labor population can establish its own "relationship" with the government, which we call democracy here in the US. Then the true environmental costs, along with various other costs, will be carried by the businesses and prices will rise quickly. (as they are now) I'm guessing that'll take 10 to 20 more years.

BV


Very interesting commentary Beau. I'm guessing the rough timeframe for your Santa Cruz example was, oh mid-'70s?

Your thoughts on relationships with the government are intruinging, and quite real. Building this with the Chinese government is very, very challenging though (you already know this, by the sounds of things) unless you are aligned with and contributing to their larger macro-economic agendas, many of which are focused on improving China overall - both for its people and for its global rise in economic stature.

Unfortunately, building racing/cruising yachts/power boats doesn't fit into any of the larger macro-economic focal "buckets" most of which include: modernizing their banking/financial systems; dramatically raising health-care and education standards; nationalizing rail/transport systems; while overall trying to reduce/penalizecorruption and dealing with urban congestion. Telecoms modernization has already largely taken place.

China's government (and its regulatory policy) is so selfishly biased towards profit/cash-flows ending up in Chinese hands that it makes FDI a real challenege. The idea of making squillions from the massively expanding middle/upper classes in China has proven to be a fallacy in many industries with the price of gaining entry and traction very, very high (think GE and locomotive engine technology here, as an excellent example).

The only thing that will make yacht-nuilding viable in the long term in China, in my opinion, is through the ongoing/expanding local consumption of luxury items from those massively expanding middle/upper classes. A yacht is just one of many "tick-in-a-box" that newly wealthy Chinese nationals must have. This is driven very much by an "out-do-my-neighbor" mentality unfortunately, as this will end up in hundreds upon hundreds of boats sitting rotting in marinas.

It's amazing how rapidly - and visibly - the consumption behavior has changed in China in even barely 5 years. In mid-2000s I struggled to see any real diversity of European cars on the roads in Beijing (except for the ton of Volkswagen Santanas that were built locally). Then came the locally made Buicks (now largely disappearing) and then the Audis and now Mercs, BMWs, Volvos etc, which can be seen everywhere now. But more notable is the sudden arrival of Porsches, Ferraris, Jaguars, Hummers, Aston Martins, Maseratis and so on in the past 5 years...and, sadly, the almost total disappearance of bicycles. Incredible.

But now I am rambling...great discussion though!


And yet the Chinese still prefer to import fast ferries (sometimes fifteen at a time) from the world's largest fast ferry builder, Austal, which makes you wonder if they have the technology to go it alone or prefer to buy something they know will work.

#16 tuf-luf

tuf-luf

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,571 posts
  • Location:xyz

Posted 02 September 2011 - 03:37 AM





yeah it is seawolf - the one and only version of this yacht thus far.

Lutra are the designers

Luctor are the builders - or the "brand" or managers of the builders.

Would be an awesome boat if they can make a few alterations to target IRC even more. No need for full carbon etc... target weight of maybe 4500-4800 instead of 4200.

It would be great if they pop these out for a decent price. Build cost in europe was probably about EURO 250k - 350k but with Chinese labour and less carbon I reckon that could be as low as 120k... maybe lower...

Sale price of 220k ex sails & electronics... bargain! they'd sell lot hot cakes.


Labour on the China Eastern seaboard (i.e. where boats are being built) ins't exactly that cheap anymore (compared to even only 5 years ago).

Foxconn (Apple component mfg'r) has started moving factories to Central China as they simply cannot meet their margin targets anymore with rapidly rising S. China labour costs.

China is a market of many massive markets (or city clusters...eg: Pearl RIver Delta) with highly varied industries driving each (eg: Shanghai & surrounding = banking + automotive...Shenzhen & surrounding = clothing/fashion/electronics mfg). Remember...China has 150 cities with >1,000,000 population.

Point being, while it is indeed cheaper to built yachts in China, than in N America/Europe, for now, this will not last for much longer. At least quality yacht building (like McConaghy China) cannot be considered notably cheaper for much longer unless they move their facility to the interior and keep training cheaper, local hires.

Fascinating to watch the sheer pace of it all. Very frustrating for business. A nightmare market in which to recruit (voice of experience here).


A good friend once said: "The free flow of capital ultimately ruins all great markets." This will prove true in China soon, and is just starting in Viet Nam. Opening their economies to massive capital in-flows will drive up production but also prices. For a time, the fact that prices don't rise as fast as production gives the target country a competitive advantage, but in time (and in the case of China it's not much longer) the prices will catch up.

There is a micro example here in Santa Cruz where it used to be really cheap to build boats in chicken coops. Labor costs and environmental costs eventually drove out the boat builders, the price got too high. This is happening in parts of China now, at a rapid rate, as it happened in the UK in the early 20th century.

The only response, for a business is to change geography or control costs though a close "relationship" with the government, something that is generally illegal in the US. For a company, this works, for the labor pool, not so great. My guess is that China will have a labor cost advantage until its labor population can establish its own "relationship" with the government, which we call democracy here in the US. Then the true environmental costs, along with various other costs, will be carried by the businesses and prices will rise quickly. (as they are now) I'm guessing that'll take 10 to 20 more years.

BV


Very interesting commentary Beau. I'm guessing the rough timeframe for your Santa Cruz example was, oh mid-'70s?

Your thoughts on relationships with the government are intruinging, and quite real. Building this with the Chinese government is very, very challenging though (you already know this, by the sounds of things) unless you are aligned with and contributing to their larger macro-economic agendas, many of which are focused on improving China overall - both for its people and for its global rise in economic stature.

Unfortunately, building racing/cruising yachts/power boats doesn't fit into any of the larger macro-economic focal "buckets" most of which include: modernizing their banking/financial systems; dramatically raising health-care and education standards; nationalizing rail/transport systems; while overall trying to reduce/penalizecorruption and dealing with urban congestion. Telecoms modernization has already largely taken place.

China's government (and its regulatory policy) is so selfishly biased towards profit/cash-flows ending up in Chinese hands that it makes FDI a real challenege. The idea of making squillions from the massively expanding middle/upper classes in China has proven to be a fallacy in many industries with the price of gaining entry and traction very, very high (think GE and locomotive engine technology here, as an excellent example).

The only thing that will make yacht-nuilding viable in the long term in China, in my opinion, is through the ongoing/expanding local consumption of luxury items from those massively expanding middle/upper classes. A yacht is just one of many "tick-in-a-box" that newly wealthy Chinese nationals must have. This is driven very much by an "out-do-my-neighbor" mentality unfortunately, as this will end up in hundreds upon hundreds of boats sitting rotting in marinas.

It's amazing how rapidly - and visibly - the consumption behavior has changed in China in even barely 5 years. In mid-2000s I struggled to see any real diversity of European cars on the roads in Beijing (except for the ton of Volkswagen Santanas that were built locally). Then came the locally made Buicks (now largely disappearing) and then the Audis and now Mercs, BMWs, Volvos etc, which can be seen everywhere now. But more notable is the sudden arrival of Porsches, Ferraris, Jaguars, Hummers, Aston Martins, Maseratis and so on in the past 5 years...and, sadly, the almost total disappearance of bicycles. Incredible.

But now I am rambling...great discussion though!


And yet the Chinese still prefer to import fast ferries (sometimes fifteen at a time) from the world's largest fast ferry builder, Austal, which makes you wonder if they have the technology to go it alone or prefer to buy something they know will work.


Hmmm...didn't know that. They are, however, building their own high-speed rail network and trains. But, and it's a BIG but, these aren't going so smoothly in early operations. See why here *gulp*!!

Posted Image

#17 jort

jort

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 26 posts
  • Location:Amsterdam
  • Interests:Sailing, Rowing, Skiing.

Posted 09 April 2013 - 07:17 AM

The tooling has not been sold to China. We still have it in The Netherlands. The 42 has had some good races in IRC and is now more optimized that way and has a different setup than she had at the launch. She raced in Key West with a Corinthean crew last year and she is faster than a Ker 40, Farr 400 or anything in that segment. That obviously comes with a rating penalty, but she is defintely able to compensate that penalty when sailed well. Seeing the HPR rule developing in the US I'm convinced she will be very competitive under that rule. We are not involved in boat building anymore, but the whole project including female tooling, SP/Gurit engineering, detailed drawings, etc. is ready to build another one. We even have drawings available for an Open 40 or canting keel version. She is an absolute rocket. So if anybody is interested you can send me a message if you want to take over this turn-key project. Serious offers are welcome. Please consider this is not just a nice little boat building project and you need to know what you are doing. This is a top notch product that requires a lot of experience and know-how. 



#18 Knee Deep-N-Cider

Knee Deep-N-Cider

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 172 posts
  • Location:St. Louis, MO

Posted 09 April 2013 - 05:05 PM

The 42 has had some good races in IRC and is now more optimized that way and has a different setup than she had at the launch. She raced in Key West with a Corinthean crew last year and she is faster than a Ker 40, Farr 400 or anything in that segment.

If they were using an entirely pro crew would they have won?



#19 Left Hook

Left Hook

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,331 posts

Posted 09 April 2013 - 05:26 PM

Jort, not sure how you can compare speed between Big Booty and the Ker 40 considering they have not (to my knowledge) ever been on the same racecourse at the same time and each raced at key west on two different years. 

 

Big Booty was no faster downwind than the MC38 in the HPR division in 2012. They often had a slight edge upwind due to waterline length and a better upwind hullform. 



#20 GME

GME

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 202 posts

Posted 10 April 2013 - 12:54 PM

The tooling has not been sold to China. We still have it in The Netherlands. The 42 has had some good races in IRC and is now more optimized that way and has a different setup than she had at the launch. She raced in Key West with a Corinthean crew last year and she is faster than a Ker 40, Farr 400 or anything in that segment. That obviously comes with a rating penalty, but she is defintely able to compensate that penalty when sailed well. Seeing the HPR rule developing in the US I'm convinced she will be very competitive under that rule. We are not involved in boat building anymore, but the whole project including female tooling, SP/Gurit engineering, detailed drawings, etc. is ready to build another one. We even have drawings available for an Open 40 or canting keel version. She is an absolute rocket. So if anybody is interested you can send me a message if you want to take over this turn-key project. Serious offers are welcome. Please consider this is not just a nice little boat building project and you need to know what you are doing. This is a top notch product that requires a lot of experience and know-how. 

 

 

The tooling has not been sold to China. We still have it in The Netherlands. The 42 has had some good races in IRC and is now more optimized that way and has a different setup than she had at the launch. She raced in Key West with a Corinthean crew last year and she is faster than a Ker 40, Farr 400 or anything in that segment. That obviously comes with a rating penalty, but she is defintely able to compensate that penalty when sailed well. Seeing the HPR rule developing in the US I'm convinced she will be very competitive under that rule. We are not involved in boat building anymore, but the whole project including female tooling, SP/Gurit engineering, detailed drawings, etc. is ready to build another one. We even have drawings available for an Open 40 or canting keel version. She is an absolute rocket. So if anybody is interested you can send me a message if you want to take over this turn-key project. Serious offers are welcome. Please consider this is not just a nice little boat building project and you need to know what you are doing. This is a top notch product that requires a lot of experience and know-how. 

I am not sure where you got the information regarding Key West last year......the Lutra 42 was signed up for the event but did not come! I can confirm what Left Hook has said - the Lutra 42 and the Ker 40 have not ever raced each other anywhere in the USA. When you discuss the 40 ish foot "segment" please know that the Carkeek 40's are included and I would be very surprised if the Lutra is capable of keeping up around the race track. We ( the ker 40) can stick with them upwind in over 13 kts of breeze but they leave us downwind. In under13 kts of breeze they are quicker uphill as well. 

 

I hope you find someone to sell your molds to, and I suspect that the quality of the molds and engineering is top notch, but claiming the Lutra 42 is as fast or faster than all of the 40 footers is disingenuous, and unfounded in actual sailing here in the US. 



#21 Drop Bear.

Drop Bear.

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 548 posts
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:none.

Posted 10 April 2013 - 03:04 PM

Wow are these still about?

Jort - You were trying to give these away at one stage after the Chinese buyers fell through right?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users