I wonder what the "Insurance Setlment" that he is using to start the funding for this project was? Maybe overexposure to lead paint?
This project reminds me a little bit of this one -
Except for the fact that this one was designed by Jim Antrim and paid for by money from DARPA and HP, yes, they're almost exactly the same.
65- by 32-foot catamaran 3200sqft of living space
#101
Posted 11 October 2011 - 10:01 PM
#102
Posted 12 October 2011 - 12:17 AM
" Why yes, I built x, y and z..." ---
" How many of these complex projects were designed by people with NO experience whatsoever ? " .....
" By which I mean, if Joe Homeowner had contacted you to build him a cliffside mansion that he was going to design himself as you worked, would you take that job ? " --- " Fuck no, are you crazy ?"
What's the bet the guy has less sailing time than the dimwit with the Tin Can or that silly Abbey girl ?
#103
Posted 12 October 2011 - 12:55 PM
Has anyone taken a field trip to visit this particular shrine to futility? Updates?
In the article, posted September 13th, he said '"We should put it in the water in about 30 days," Lane said, as he showed off the nine-bedroom, three-bathroom 3,200-square-foot boat on a recent afternoon.'
So we should be really close to hearing about a sinking in San Diego harbor, right?
#104
Posted 12 October 2011 - 05:49 PM
Reid Stowe : " I have the crew and the mushrooms"
What a potential combination.
They will both go down in history.
The rest of us will lead healthy obscure lives.
#105
Posted 12 October 2011 - 06:21 PM
This project reminds me a little bit of this one -
Except for the fact that this one was designed by Jim Antrim and paid for by money from DARPA and HP, yes, they're almost exactly the same.
Not to mention a couple of years of design and development testing materials. I sailed with Jim when he was working on that thing. His description of the design effort was something along the lines of wild and lots of materials strength testing.
#106
Posted 12 October 2011 - 06:51 PM
The boys over at Woodenboat are having a field day with this one as well http://forum.woodenb...th-II&p=3124203
To quote: "Anyone remember the similar case of a large aluminum trimaran mocked by Sailing Anarchy a few years ago? That was fun."
That sounds interesting; does anyone have a link?
Edit: did search for 'Tin Can' but, no luck.
#107
Posted 12 October 2011 - 08:32 PM
#108
Posted 12 October 2011 - 10:33 PM
This project reminds me a little bit of this one -
Except for the fact that this one was designed by Jim Antrim and paid for by money from DARPA and HP, yes, they're almost exactly the same.
Not to mention a couple of years of design and development testing materials. I sailed with Jim when he was working on that thing. His description of the design effort was something along the lines of wild and lots of materials strength testing.
What the heck was that thing designed for in the first place?
#109
Posted 13 October 2011 - 02:48 AM
I see some resemblance...
This project reminds me a little bit of this one -
http://www.vbar.com/...index100810.php
Except for the fact that this one was designed by Jim Antrim and paid for by money from DARPA and HP, yes, they're almost exactly the same.
Not to mention a couple of years of design and development testing materials. I sailed with Jim when he was working on that thing. His description of the design effort was something along the lines of wild and lots of materials strength testing.
What the heck was that thing designed for in the first place?
#110
Posted 13 October 2011 - 01:39 PM
#111
Posted 13 October 2011 - 02:44 PM
....
but, I'm not aware of any statute or precedent in which a person has been prosecuted for attempted suicide.
yes, otherwise Reid would have been cuffed when he returned..
#112
Posted 14 October 2011 - 10:39 AM
#113
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:20 PM
...well since you asked and I had a little time today, here you go.No photo/news updates on this? It's been a month! He should be ready to launch....
aft shot
P1010008.JPG 635.43K
393 downloads
#114
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:22 PM
#115
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:24 PM
P1010007.JPG 585.33K
111 downloads
#116
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:24 PM
...well since you asked and I had a little time today, here you go.
No photo/news updates on this? It's been a month! He should be ready to launch....
aft shotP1010008.JPG 635.43K 393 downloads
Looks great. If the BBQ doesn't burn it down first, will he be sailing around backwards? Or does he plan to just wait till the water dissolves the sheetrock so he can see where he's going?
#117
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:24 PM
easy Rambo there's more...
...well since you asked and I had a little time today, here you go.
No photo/news updates on this? It's been a month! He should be ready to launch....
aft shotP1010008.JPG 635.43K 393 downloads
Looks great. If the BBQ doesn't burn it down first, will he be sailing around backwards? Or does he plan to just wait till the water dissolves the sheetrock so he can see where he's going?
#119
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:27 PM
#122
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:30 PM
#123
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:32 PM
P1010021.JPG 647.53K
119 downloads
#124
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:33 PM
P1010016.JPG 610.8K
98 downloads
#125
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:35 PM
#126
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:36 PM
Attached Files
#129
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:40 PM
#130
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:42 PM
#131
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:43 PM
#132
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:45 PM
#134
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:53 PM
Length : 65'
Beam : 35'
Rig : 35' main mast, 28' mizzen.
Displacement: 5 tons (10,000lbs) est.
Aux Power : Twin 9hp outboard 2/4 stroke gas engines. Twin genset 120vac electrical fitment
Other: Twin aft steering stations with cable rudder movement.
Intended use: Live Aboard/Charter.
Expected launch: Within next month for basic hull. Fit out/rigging completed while afloat.
Destination after launch: Sausilto for fit out. NZ once complete.
#135
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:56 PM
Home grade 2x4, 1/2" and 3/4" ply with spray epoxy coating on all interior surfaces. Exterior finished with epoxy and 8oz - 12oz e-glass.
#136
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:56 PM
...well since you asked and I had a little time today, here you go.
No photo/news updates on this? It's been a month! He should be ready to launch....
aft shotP1010008.JPG 635.43K 393 downloads
Dude, that's awesome! I'm guessing he was more than OK with you taking pictures? What are you thoughts on seaworthyness now that you've seen it up really close? What are the pontoons covered with? I have a shitload of obvious questions....
#137
Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:58 PM
#138
Posted 14 October 2011 - 08:02 PM
Give me a few moments to gather my notes/thoughts, I'm currently digesting the experience.
...well since you asked and I had a little time today, here you go.
No photo/news updates on this? It's been a month! He should be ready to launch....
aft shotP1010008.JPG 635.43K 393 downloads
Dude, that's awesome! I'm guessing he was more than OK with you taking pictures? What are you thoughts on seaworthyness now that you've seen it up really close? What are the pontoons covered with? I have a shitload of obvious questions....
#139
Posted 14 October 2011 - 08:04 PM
Give me a few moments to gather my notes/thoughts, I'm currently digesting the experience.
...well since you asked and I had a little time today, here you go.
No photo/news updates on this? It's been a month! He should be ready to launch....
aft shotP1010008.JPG 635.43K 393 downloads
Dude, that's awesome! I'm guessing he was more than OK with you taking pictures? What are you thoughts on seaworthyness now that you've seen it up really close? What are the pontoons covered with? I have a shitload of obvious questions....
HA! Thanks for takin' one for the team!
#140
Posted 14 October 2011 - 08:17 PM
#141
Posted 14 October 2011 - 08:19 PM
#142
Posted 14 October 2011 - 08:37 PM
Its gonna be lucky to stay afloat in an oversized bathtub.
Anybody know if this guy has an sailing experience?
#143
Posted 14 October 2011 - 08:51 PM
Thanks so much for the pictures. I really think it is cool (but oh so misguided) that this guy is just "doing it".
Please tell us more about Hotrod, his plans, his aspirations, and if he has any doubts.
While this is a train-wreck-in-progress, I salute Hotrod for having a dream, and trying to make his dream come true. But he has so much to learn. But we can learn from him, too.
#144
Posted 14 October 2011 - 09:07 PM
It’s hard not to be really critical and tell him he’s f’ed up and doesn’t know what he is doing (I didn’t, I just listened), but I doubt that anything anyone can say will discourage him from trying to complete the boat and sailing it south. He seems focused and truly believes what he is doing will work. One part of me feels sad because I know what is going to happen, we all do, and at the same time I’m happy to see him say, ”Fuck it, I’m doing what I want.”
#145
Posted 14 October 2011 - 09:10 PM
He has sailed a Hobie16 and a dinghy. I believe he said he currently owns them. He has no offshore experience, but as he said, "It's all the same." Not really sure what that means.He thinks that thing can go offshore to NZ?
Its gonna be lucky to stay afloat in an oversized bathtub.
Anybody know if this guy has an sailing experience?
#146
Posted 14 October 2011 - 09:16 PM
Thanks again.
As someone once said, "experience is a good teacher, but sometimes the lessons come too late".
From your assessment, it seems that Hotrod needs to launch, then learn for himself the error of his ways. As others have also said, he likely won't get far before things start to go wrong.
I also recall hearing that when it comes to boatbuilding, finishing the hull is only about 10% of the total effort. He still has lots to do before casting off his docklines (he has some of those, right?). He won't be going very far for some time yet.
Please continue to keep us informed about this guy, his dream and his boat.
#147
Posted 14 October 2011 - 09:23 PM
P1010008.JPG 635.43K
393 downloadsThe main crossbeams which double as floor bearers are already bowed under the weight of a half completed cabin, and the thing is not even fitted out yet, let alone floating or supporting rig tension. Id like to see how it will cope when the wave pattern is diagonal to the centreline. Its not a question of if, its a question of how it will break up. My guess is the first fix carpentry diagonal bracing holding the hulls to the main deck will be the first to go, and then it will be a progressive breakdown until the front falls off. And that is all before the truck has lifted it off the stolen brick pallets.
#148
Posted 14 October 2011 - 09:24 PM
I really didn't get into his motivations for the project because I really didn't want to interrupt his work (there's a lot to do) or seem rude. I'd love to go back with a 6-pack of brew and sit down and BS with him, ask him all those pointy questions, maybe meet his son, but that might be intrusive.bhyde,
Thanks so much for the pictures. I really think it is cool (but oh so misguided) that this guy is just "doing it".
Please tell us more about Hotrod, his plans, his aspirations, and if he has any doubts.
While this is a train-wreck-in-progress, I salute Hotrod for having a dream, and trying to make his dream come true. But he has so much to learn. But we can learn from him, too.
I have nothing other than an impression, but I think he has doubts. How could he not?
If I had one piece of advice for him, I would ask him to go out on a large sailboat with his wife and kids, maybe 40'-50' and try sailing around the Farallons when it's "on." He might find that a useful experience, as would his family.
#149
Posted 14 October 2011 - 09:30 PM
Per Hotrod, anyone with spare marine hardware, engines, water tanks, rigging, money or other useful items would be greatly appreciated for the project. Sponsors are also welcome.
same goes for my boat. plenty of sponsorship opportunities available.
#150
Posted 14 October 2011 - 09:36 PM
There are better post divorce recovery plans than this, but when youve only got a judgment of $10,000 to show from a lifetime of hard work, well hell, maybe its just therapy.
Its just nice to screw something back for a change huh ? Even if it is an ugly SOB that deserves 800lb of screwing, its still a sad way to go...
Whats the bet that he just signwrites the sides with comments about his ex wife, and just drives off and leaves the POS in the shopping centre carpark, pumped full of concrete never to be seen again.
NOW THATS A GREAT IDEA..
#151
Posted 14 October 2011 - 09:36 PM
Length : 65'
Rig : 35' main mast, 28' mizzen.
For reals??!!
Hull shape and construction aside, that 2-knot shitbox ain't goin' nowhere.
#152
Posted 14 October 2011 - 09:45 PM
For real. He has the rig, but Eason recommended a larger setup. That's what Hotrod said. It did not look like there was any provision for a jib.
Length : 65'
Rig : 35' main mast, 28' mizzen.
For reals??!!![]()
Hull shape and construction aside, that 2-knot shitbox ain't goin' nowhere.
#153
Posted 14 October 2011 - 10:47 PM
I'm perusing bhyde's pics and my wife walks in. "What you looking at?" (well at least it wasn't porn this time) "It's sort of hard to say but it's supposed to be a 65 by 35-foot boat." "Oh, I thought it was a basement."
He's going to fit it out after it's afloat? I hope he works fast.
#154
Posted 14 October 2011 - 10:59 PM
No matter how it turns out ( or turns over, or falls apart, or...) I share Bhydes sentiment that it is kind of cool for Hotrod to just say fuck it, I'm building my boat.
#155
Posted 14 October 2011 - 11:07 PM
to paint in BIG Orange Lettering
DA-WOODY.COM
on the bottom
#156
Posted 14 October 2011 - 11:36 PM
For real. He has the rig, but Eason recommended a larger setup. That's what Hotrod said. It did not look like there was any provision for a jib.
Length : 65'
Rig : 35' main mast, 28' mizzen.
For reals??!!![]()
Hull shape and construction aside, that 2-knot shitbox ain't goin' nowhere.
Its a shame he didn't make the season closer
#157
Posted 14 October 2011 - 11:39 PM
...well since you asked and I had a little time today, here you go.
No photo/news updates on this? It's been a month! He should be ready to launch....
aft shotP1010008.JPG 635.43K 393 downloads
Inspired by the Seawinds with a BBQ on the aft beam
#158
Posted 14 October 2011 - 11:41 PM
On the bright side, that means less compression on those three 2x4s that make up the compression post. Rigging need only be hand-tight. Will he be using shrouds of fencing wire to Home Depot cast pot-metal turnbuckles?For real. He has the rig, but Eason recommended a larger setup. That's what Hotrod said. It did not look like there was any provision for a jib.
Length : 65'
Rig : 35' main mast, 28' mizzen.
For reals??!!![]()
Hull shape and construction aside, that 2-knot shitbox ain't goin' nowhere.
#159
Posted 15 October 2011 - 12:34 AM
Best. Trainwreck. Ever.
No matter how it turns out ( or turns over, or falls apart, or...) I share Bhydes sentiment that it is kind of cool for Hotrod to just say fuck it, I'm building my boat.
Dare he be called an "Anarchist"
#160
Posted 15 October 2011 - 01:57 AM
Best. Trainwreck. Ever.
No matter how it turns out ( or turns over, or falls apart, or...) I share Bhydes sentiment that it is kind of cool for Hotrod to just say fuck it, I'm building my boat.
Dare he be called an "Anarchist"
#161
Posted 15 October 2011 - 03:23 AM
P1010013.JPG 527.03K
544 downloadsThis is the picture that really makes me take pause. This is inside the port hull, midship, looking forward. The thing to note here is the white piece of wood bolted to the bulkhead (upper right side of pic). That white piece of wood is the crossbeam. From what I can tell about catamaran design, the crossbeam joint and load transfer characteristic therein are real important, so this is where the money is. It, and about four or five others, are holding the two hulls together. There is no hidden structure, just a set of 2x4's coming through the hull and bolted , with a single 1/2" galvanized lag bolt mind you, to a vertical member of the bulkhead. There is no re-enforcement of any kind behind or around the bolt and the bolt is merely sitting in a 1/2' hole drilled through the wood. How this is suppose to transfer any kind of load to the bulkhead is simply beyond me. Not that it would make much difference. The bulkhead is 1/2' ply (one side only) with 2x4 framing screwed to the skin of the hull and notched for the stringers. My best guess as to what would happen if the boat ever got close to the water is that the hulls would simply fold outward, pivoting on the bolts, and the bridge deck would fall to the surface of the water. If that didn't happen, then surely any serious side force on the hulls would simply rip the beams out of the bulkhead.
#162
Posted 15 October 2011 - 03:34 AM
#163
Posted 15 October 2011 - 04:25 AM
or perhaps the dude placed an ad for Multi-hull ACcommodations for the AC in SF
Dude could turn a profit on the deposit alone
other wise may it be breife and painless
#164
Posted 15 October 2011 - 05:22 AM
Somewhere there's pics of the structural build of the tincan, this is right along the same lines....
#165
Posted 15 October 2011 - 07:30 AM
#166
Posted 15 October 2011 - 07:44 AM
A house mover.It will never even make it to the water.......how the hell is a crane going to pick it up without it falling to bits???
Duh!
#167
Posted 15 October 2011 - 09:00 AM
That should make it safe...
This might be a destination for them to aim for in NZ... http://www.maritimen...nt/location.asp
#168
Posted 15 October 2011 - 04:11 PM
Fricken shades of David Vann all over again.
Somewhere there's pics of the structural build of the tincan, this is right along the same lines....
The "Tin Can" was/is pretty scary.- especially the sailing rigging- but structurally it was quite a bit more sound than this this lumber yard. Might be time to review the tin can articles vs coast guard response. This thing is a lot bigger- maybe big enough to fall under a different set of regulations. We don't need multihull publicity like this (yeah I know, any publicity is good publicity)
#169
Posted 15 October 2011 - 06:05 PM
not funnyPresumably it complies with the Jones act being constructed in the USA....
That should make it safe...
This might be a destination for them to aim for in NZ... http://www.maritimen...nt/location.asp
#170
Posted 15 October 2011 - 07:17 PM

or just a PS-3
#171
Posted 15 October 2011 - 10:20 PM
P1010013.JPG 527.03K 544 downloads
This is the picture that really makes me take pause. This is inside the port hull, midship, looking forward. The thing to note here is the white piece of wood bolted to the bulkhead (upper right side of pic). That white piece of wood is the crossbeam. From what I can tell about catamaran design, the crossbeam joint and load transfer characteristic therein are real important, so this is where the money is. It, and about four or five others, are holding the two hulls together. There is no hidden structure, just a set of 2x4's coming through the hull and bolted , with a single 1/2" galvanized lag bolt mind you, to a vertical member of the bulkhead. There is no re-enforcement of any kind behind or around the bolt and the bolt is merely sitting in a 1/2' hole drilled through the wood. How this is suppose to transfer any kind of load to the bulkhead is simply beyond me. Not that it would make much difference. The bulkhead is 1/2' ply (one side only) with 2x4 framing screwed to the skin of the hull and notched for the stringers. My best guess as to what would happen if the boat ever got close to the water is that the hulls would simply fold outward, pivoting on the bolts, and the bridge deck would fall to the surface of the water. If that didn't happen, then surely any serious side force on the hulls would simply rip the beams out of the bulkhead.
I was thinking the same thing. You really should point that out to him.
Once the bottom of the bridgedeck is sheathed, can he glass the hulls to the bridgedeck?
#172
Posted 15 October 2011 - 10:49 PM
It is not as if any change to this detail will make the boat safe.
#173
Posted 15 October 2011 - 10:57 PM
Once the bottom of the bridgedeck is sheathed, can he glass the hulls to the bridgedeck?
yeah fibreglassing upside down, working above your head, when gravity is no longer your friend is a lot of fun. If he sheathes the underside of the bridgedeck in plywood, and glasses over that skin, it will be FAIL because it will just rip the plywood off the frames. If he fibreglasses just the diagonal reinforcing between bridgedeck and the hull innerfaces under the boat, then that will give him a few more minutes alive, but the fun will come when the wave striking the underside of the bridgedeck starts peeling the bridgedeck floors away from the floor joists and pulling 800lbs of countersunk head screws through 10mm of non marine plywood, just before the non waterproof glue lines give way, and the crappy innercores of cheap plywood let go. I didnt see any budget for glue in this project. You can bet its not marine plywood. Exterior grade at best, which doesnt have the same structural integrity as marine grade. You can bet he hasnt keyed the plywood so that the epoxy gets a good hold. Spray epoxy as an afterthought just wont cut it. When the veneers start separating, the mast wants to drive down through the deck and waves start coming through cracks in the floor, no amount of battery drill screwing will save you Hotrod. You should be using glue brother, not just galvanized countersunk head screws. If a battery drill can sink a countersunk screw head halfway through 10mm plywood, what do you reckon an ocean swell will do to it ?
#174
Posted 15 October 2011 - 11:10 PM
Home Depot scored with this guy.
#175
Posted 15 October 2011 - 11:16 PM
I'm not sure he would understand the concept. He thinks that because the hull are asymmetrical that they will always be pushing together so the beams (and joints) are always under compression. I'm not even sure what that means, but that's the thinking.
P1010013.JPG 527.03K 544 downloads
This is the picture that really makes me take pause. This is inside the port hull, midship, looking forward. The thing to note here is the white piece of wood bolted to the bulkhead (upper right side of pic). That white piece of wood is the crossbeam. From what I can tell about catamaran design, the crossbeam joint and load transfer characteristic therein are real important, so this is where the money is. It, and about four or five others, are holding the two hulls together. There is no hidden structure, just a set of 2x4's coming through the hull and bolted , with a single 1/2" galvanized lag bolt mind you, to a vertical member of the bulkhead. There is no re-enforcement of any kind behind or around the bolt and the bolt is merely sitting in a 1/2' hole drilled through the wood. How this is suppose to transfer any kind of load to the bulkhead is simply beyond me. Not that it would make much difference. The bulkhead is 1/2' ply (one side only) with 2x4 framing screwed to the skin of the hull and notched for the stringers. My best guess as to what would happen if the boat ever got close to the water is that the hulls would simply fold outward, pivoting on the bolts, and the bridge deck would fall to the surface of the water. If that didn't happen, then surely any serious side force on the hulls would simply rip the beams out of the bulkhead.
I was thinking the same thing. You really should point that out to him.
Once the bottom of the bridgedeck is sheathed, can he glass the hulls to the bridgedeck?
He is planning on covering the bottom of the bridge deck with plywood (1/2") and then glassing over the wood. The two hulls are currently glassed with a single layer of 8oz glass and are completely set (cured). Nowhere in the area of the bridgedeck-to-hull joint did I see any reason to believe he was planning on building up layers of glass to re-enforce the joint and spread the load of the crossbeams. He would have had to sand the area or use Peel-Ply to get a reasonable surface for apply future layers. That isn't there. In other places on the boat where glass was applied, I saw no evidence that joints had been rounded or filled as is common, and absolutely required, for good structural bonding. I think he feels that the glass is just there to keep water from soaking into the wood and not required for structural reasons.
One of the other things that was a little weird was the color of the hulls. It looked to me like the hulls had already been painted, but Hotrod said that was just the color of the epoxy, which was distinctly yellow (hard to tell in the photos). I'm not sure what brand/type epoxy he is using, but he said it turned that color after it had been in the sun for several months. That can't be good.
One of the statements that Hotrod made that really gives you the willies was about fiberglass boats. It was something to the effect that he didn't like fiberglass boats because they would sink if holed. A wood boat, on the other hand, would not because wood floats. Even if the boat broke up, it wouldn't be a problem because the pieces would always float (being wood). What I should have pointed out is, up until recently, most boats were made of wood and that there are many thousands of sunken wooded boats and crews currently residing on the bottom of many lakes, seas, and oceans throughout the world.
#176
Posted 15 October 2011 - 11:33 PM
just sayin
he's not gonna let you on it if it floats is he? - it'd be doomed then
#177
Posted 15 October 2011 - 11:37 PM
Oh nice. Unprotected epoxy already oxidizing before it's even launched.It looked to me like the hulls had already been painted, but Hotrod said that was just the color of the epoxy, which was distinctly yellow (hard to tell in the photos). I'm not sure what brand/type epoxy he is using, but he said it turned that color after it had been in the sun for several months. That can't be good.
Does he know he needs to protect epoxy from UV?
I mean, it's already probably too late, but...
#178
Posted 17 October 2011 - 01:24 PM
how is he planning on moving it?
65 x 32 feet is a lot to move.
</spam>
#179
Posted 17 October 2011 - 04:03 PM
Maybe log rollers or those house-moving dollies. It would never survive a crane hoist in the conventional manner. I'm not even sure where you could attach a crane. There are no chain plates or obvious hard points and wrapping a strap around the thing would fold it in a heartbeat.<spam>
how is he planning on moving it?
65 x 32 feet is a lot to move.
</spam>
#180
Posted 17 October 2011 - 04:14 PM
Maybe log rollers or those house-moving dollies. It would never survive a crane hoist in the conventional manner. I'm not even sure where you could attach a crane. There are no chain plates or obvious hard points and wrapping a strap around the thing would fold it in a heartbeat.
<spam>
how is he planning on moving it?
65 x 32 feet is a lot to move.
</spam>
,,,,he'll be fine as long as he doesn't fill the swimming pool!!
#181
Posted 17 October 2011 - 04:32 PM
Also, doesn't the CG have to certify this in come way before allowing it to hit the water. Not that it would even make it that far.
#182
Posted 17 October 2011 - 05:07 PM
#183
Posted 17 October 2011 - 05:13 PM
Anarchy or not, someone needs to tell this guy to stop.
Why?
So long as he has liability insurance, and can clean up whatever mess he makes, I say have at it!
Lets just all enjoy the show.
#184
Posted 17 October 2011 - 05:14 PM
#185
Posted 17 October 2011 - 05:42 PM
not funny
Presumably it complies with the Jones act being constructed in the USA....
That should make it safe...
This might be a destination for them to aim for in NZ... http://www.maritimen...nt/location.asp
actually if he keeps his habitat GREEN
a parking spot like the one in NZ or the one like Pereni Nav (spelling ???) staked out would be perfect
I mean sittin on the bottom surrounded by water (@ high-tide) w freeboard to spare, close to shore = Perfect
don't know how it will fair in harsher conditions - like rain
One thing for sure - It should be certified as 100% non-toxic & water soluble before moving any whatsoever
anyone want to guess how it would fair in a 4.3 on the "richter" where it sits ???
I think he's just hoping for som squat-water condo parking
if he had 2 tall masts on each hull
that went all the way through like this twin masted ship that is having no stability problems

#186
Posted 17 October 2011 - 06:52 PM
<spam>
how is he planning on moving it?
65 x 32 feet is a lot to move.
</spam>
he's not going to move it... he's waiting for for the front to fall off California and viola, he'll be floating..
#187
Posted 17 October 2011 - 07:02 PM
Starboard settee looking aft from inside.
Love the sledge hammer... Gotta seat that 3/4" t&g plywood floor...
This thing would make a cool sailing club building... Juniors would love it...
#188
Posted 17 October 2011 - 07:11 PM
edit
I bet if he hang up a sign that he's building a modern ark - with plans laid in some sacred texts, the local planning guys will leave him alone….
#189
Posted 17 October 2011 - 07:22 PM
Thanks for keeping us in the loop and all the pics, way too funny!
What is sad is the amount of money Hotrod is putting into this project. He would have been much better off building a house boat that never leaves the harbor. Does he have deep pockets? Because somebody is going to pay to clean up this floating mess when she breaks up...
#190
Posted 17 October 2011 - 07:23 PM
#191
Posted 17 October 2011 - 07:34 PM
#192
Posted 17 October 2011 - 07:34 PM
Global warming.<spam>
how is he planning on moving it?
65 x 32 feet is a lot to move.
</spam>
#193
Posted 17 October 2011 - 07:40 PM
Oh, almost forgot. When I started talking to Hotrod, his phone rang. It was the Sausalito Harbor Master verifying that, no they would not be able to accommodate a 65x32 home-built cat. That seemed to be shockingly bad news, so I suggested that Richardson Bay, not being under the control of the Sausalite Harbor Master and being a free anchorage, would be just the place to go. Problem solved.
#194
Posted 17 October 2011 - 09:13 PM
So far it looks fine... No cardboard or cardboard derivitives, no cello tape... She's safe...
The plywood he is using may as well be.
#195
Posted 17 October 2011 - 10:13 PM
Maybe log rollers or those house-moving dollies. It would never survive a crane hoist in the conventional manner. I'm not even sure where you could attach a crane. There are no chain plates or obvious hard points and wrapping a strap around the thing would fold it in a heartbeat.
<spam>
how is he planning on moving it?
65 x 32 feet is a lot to move.
</spam>
or borrow these inflatable logs... they seem ready for an encore
#196
Posted 17 October 2011 - 11:13 PM
#197
Posted 17 October 2011 - 11:46 PM
Oh, almost forgot. When I started talking to Hotrod, his phone rang. It was the Sausalito Harbor Master verifying that, no they would not be able to accommodate a 65x32 home-built cat. That seemed to be shockingly bad news, so I suggested that Richardson Bay, not being under the control of the Sausalite Harbor Master and being a free anchorage, would be just the place to go. Problem solved.
Hey B you might want to remove this post County of Marin may send you a clean up bill when that thing breaks up and washes up on the shore after a winter storm. Great adventure just sad its so large and he will have spent every dime he has making it.
#198
Posted 17 October 2011 - 11:55 PM
#199
Posted 18 October 2011 - 12:00 AM
I trust the wiring will be household Romex? And lots of wire nuts...
It's Ok I heard he was spraying some rubber paint over all the exposed bits ;-) he has it all figured out I tell ya!
#200
Posted 18 October 2011 - 12:13 AM
Winter storm, bah! This thing is designed to cross entire oceans! 96" sliding glass door on the back, BBQ, and 600lbs of screws laugh at winter storms. A 3.6 earthquake on the other hand...
Oh, almost forgot. When I started talking to Hotrod, his phone rang. It was the Sausalito Harbor Master verifying that, no they would not be able to accommodate a 65x32 home-built cat. That seemed to be shockingly bad news, so I suggested that Richardson Bay, not being under the control of the Sausalite Harbor Master and being a free anchorage, would be just the place to go. Problem solved.
Hey B you might want to remove this post County of Marin may send you a clean up bill when that thing breaks up and washes up on the shore after a winter storm. Great adventure just sad its so large and he will have spent every dime he has making it.
BTW: You're up next. It's only 10 minutes from RYC, and I assure you, it's well worth the trip.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













