http://www.bbc.co.uk...europe-16558910


Just unbelievable that something like this could happen in a time where you can run a chartplotter on an iphone.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 11:24 AM


Posted 14 January 2012 - 01:21 PM
BBC News - Italy cruise ship Costa Concordia aground near Giglio:
http://www.bbc.co.uk...europe-16558910
Just unbelievable that something like this could happen in a time where you can run a chartplotter on an iphone.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 01:31 PM
um Colombus was an Italian.
BBC News - Italy cruise ship Costa Concordia aground near Giglio:
http://www.bbc.co.uk...europe-16558910
Just unbelievable that something like this could happen in a time where you can run a chartplotter on an iphone.
HORRIBLE.
Don't forget where this happened. Colombus was a Spainiard.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 01:50 PM
BBC News - Italy cruise ship Costa Concordia aground near Giglio:
http://www.bbc.co.uk...europe-16558910
Just unbelievable that something like this could happen in a time where you can run a chartplotter on an iphone.
Analysis
Richard Westcott BBC transport correspondent
....
All ships have to meet safety standards set out by the International Maritime Organisation. Crews are trained to deal with emergency and cruise companies stress this kind of accident is rare.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 01:55 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 01:59 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 03:10 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 03:41 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 03:56 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 03:56 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 03:58 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 04:20 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 04:25 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 04:31 PM
Terrible, 69 people unaccounted for.
Interview with a crewman said it was during the dinner service 2 hours out from the mainland, boat definitely hit something very hard with near immediate list. He reported panic and fighting amongst passengers. The captain turned the ship towards the island to attempt to get it into shallow water. Reports of many passengers jumping into the water as launching the lifeboats was slow and difficult with listing.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 04:32 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 04:50 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 05:03 PM
Terrible, 69 people unaccounted for.
Interview with a crewman said it was during the dinner service 2 hours out from the mainland, boat definitely hit something very hard with near immediate list. He reported panic and fighting amongst passengers. The captain turned the ship towards the island to attempt to get it into shallow water. Reports of many passengers jumping into the water as launching the lifeboats was slow and difficult with listing.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 05:22 PM
Remember the Andrea Doria? The Italian crew fought the passengers for space on the lifeboats.
A ship with an Italian crew and Italian passengers would have been a monkey house.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 05:37 PM
Pack a life jacket!Great, we're leaving on an cruise tomorrow.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 05:44 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 05:50 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 05:58 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 06:00 PM
What, a submarine continent? Atlantis? There is a huge rock embedded in the bottom of that ship.While all the experts are speculating let's throw in a collision with a (pick you nationality) submarine conspiracy theory. Condolennces to those lost.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 06:30 PM
And totally preventable. I'll wager the bridge officers are found to have been negligent.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 06:32 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 06:36 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 06:37 PM
Hey, that'll buff out.
Had to be said.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 06:58 PM
While all the experts are speculating let's throw in a collision with a (pick you nationality) submarine conspiracy theory. Condolennces to those lost.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 07:20 PM
How do you say "would you like fries w/ your meal" in Italian?
cause that's about the only job "Capt" will be able to get now!
Posted 14 January 2012 - 07:24 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 07:37 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 07:41 PM
"Earlier Saturday Francesco Schettino, captain of the Costa Concordia, had told Italian television that the vessel had hit a rocky spur while cruising in waters which, according to the charts, should have been safe.
"As we were navigating at cruise speed, we hit a rocky spur," he told Tgcom24 television station:
"According to the nautical chart, there should have been sufficient water underneath us," he added."

Posted 14 January 2012 - 07:45 PM
"Earlier Saturday Francesco Schettino, captain of the Costa Concordia, had told Italian television that the vessel had hit a rocky spur while cruising in waters which, according to the charts, should have been safe.
"As we were navigating at cruise speed, we hit a rocky spur," he told Tgcom24 television station:
"According to the nautical chart, there should have been sufficient water underneath us," he added."
I dunno, there certainly seems to be another rock pointing out of the water really close to the ship:
Posted 14 January 2012 - 07:46 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 08:10 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 08:13 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 08:19 PM
Yep. An initial report was he hit 'something' not necesssarily a rock, and headed for shallow water to beach her.My take, that the captain was making for shore after the encounter with the rock. Was attempting to keep the ship from sinking in deep water, with a much bigger loss of life.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 08:23 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 08:23 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 08:34 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 08:41 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 08:50 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 09:13 PM
Looking at the photos of it on the 20 deg list looks like the power was out, No lights inside seem to be going. Only the lights that you want for using the life rafts are going and they should be able to be supplied from a deck level emergency generator.From the second video, it appears that the ship spent quite some time at only a moderate list (20 degrees or so) and with decks well out of the water, rather than going over at-all quickly.
So as to why anyone would be trapped below would seem a question.
Hopefully it will turn out that most or all of the unaccounted-for persons simply never were aboard, or were aboard but escaped safely and, well, just haven't been accounted for.
As for the captain being arrested, my understanding is that this has no real implication: it's just what they do there in cases at all like this.
I do have to say that it's a poor show of him to have left the ship so long as there was any rescuing to be done that he could direct or aid. What was his rush? Was starting to get hungry, and the food service staff had already vamoosed?
Posted 14 January 2012 - 09:30 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 09:38 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 11:13 PM
Posted 14 January 2012 - 11:41 PM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:18 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:29 AM
actually on ships and boats it is medicentric height.Reports said the damage section extended 50 meters, I want to see the ship plans to see how many bulkhead compartments that can flood.
Without a doubt, these ships are top heavy, and with such a high center of gravity it's almost a godsend that it didn't capsize faster.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:47 AM
120114_sunkcruiseship.grid-8x2.jpg 32.39K
91 downloadsPosted 15 January 2012 - 12:55 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:58 AM
actually on ships and boats it is medicentric height.
Reports said the damage section extended 50 meters, I want to see the ship plans to see how many bulkhead compartments that can flood.
Without a doubt, these ships are top heavy, and with such a high center of gravity it's almost a godsend that it didn't capsize faster.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:07 AM
this could be the post of the year
And totally preventable. I'll wager the bridge officers are found to have been negligent.
yuh think...?
it was either the officer in charge, or the rock that was negligent..., and my money's on the officer.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:12 AM
How is the ship at fault?Love the interview with 'industry expert' on the BBC
"these ships are built for revenue generation not safety"
Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:37 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:43 AM
120114_sunkcruiseship.grid-8x2.jpg 32.39K 91 downloads
Interestingly the stabiliser fin further forward appears to be undamaged.... which appears to indicate they steered hard to starboard before sideswiping the rock with the stern.
Also looking at the map, the wreck is now on a heading south, while they were sailing northwards. The crew actually turned the ship around after the incident and headed for the island to get the passengers as close to help as possible - must have saved a number of lives.
So yes, major stupidity hitting the rock in the first place, but good points for getting the ship as close as possible to help afterwards
After following the Rena incident here it seems that those oil booms really only work on the flat water of a harbor, Still I'm surprised that there isn't an oil slick coming out of that thing.No hint of an oil protection boom around the wreck. Isn't that standard practice? With holes below the waterline, and the ship lying on her side it's only a matter of time before something leaks out.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:50 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:52 AM
120114_sunkcruiseship.grid-8x2.jpg 32.39K 91 downloads
Interestingly the stabiliser fin further forward appears to be undamaged.... which appears to indicate they steered hard to starboard before sideswiping the rock with the stern.
Also looking at the map, the wreck is now on a heading south, while they were sailing northwards. The crew actually turned the ship around after the incident and headed for the island to get the passengers as close to help as possible - must have saved a number of lives.
So yes, major stupidity hitting the rock in the first place, but good points for getting the ship as close as possible to help afterwards
I'm sure that's going to be the but of a joke around here soon, It's just too soon at the moment.After following the Rena incident here it seems that those oil booms really only work on the flat water of a harbor, Still I'm surprised that there isn't an oil slick coming out of that thing.No hint of an oil protection boom around the wreck. Isn't that standard practice? With holes below the waterline, and the ship lying on her side it's only a matter of time before something leaks out.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 02:20 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 02:43 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 02:51 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 03:02 AM
have another look at the rip in the bottom and the embedded rock
is the bow on the right ?
was the ship going backwards at the time of contact ?
could this indicate an azimuthing problem ? .............. ie some sort of electrical control or power clusterfuck ?
did the drives go out of control AFTER the initial grounding ? ..... before they lost driving power ?
seems like the skipper did the best thing he could by attempting to beach the ship after the first " touch "
a sideways jump is possible ( rocky horror ) if these drives blow their mind .............................................
Posted 15 January 2012 - 03:40 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 04:42 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 05:10 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 06:09 AM
The initial course alteration occurs at a distance that might correlate with visual.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 06:31 AM
it had used that route last year
http://video.corrier...52-5f77182bc574
Posted 15 January 2012 - 06:31 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 06:35 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 06:46 AM
Very good assessment, I'm supprised that they didn't hail that funny object and request that it move out her way .....16 minutes of no AIS position, I reckon this is what happened
Posted 15 January 2012 - 07:08 AM
Let's wait until we get some facts aye.16 minutes of no AIS position, I reckon this is what happened
Posted 15 January 2012 - 07:27 AM
Water temp is around 10c, which is quitle cold if all you're wearing is a tshirt.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 07:46 AM
You are right, 15c it is, apparently there is a place in France with the same name.
Water temp is around 10c, which is quitle cold if all you're wearing is a tshirt.
Where do you get that?15C according to http://www.eurometeo...meteomar/id_tce
Posted 15 January 2012 - 07:55 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 08:14 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 08:18 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 08:29 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 10:19 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 10:23 AM
Remember the Andrea Doria? The Italian crew fought the passengers for space on the lifeboats.
A ship with an Italian crew and Italian passengers would have been a monkey house.
How about the Greek cruise ship Oceanus?
The captain was one of the first ashore while hundreds of passengers were still on the stricken vessel.
http://en.wikipedia....iki/MTS_Oceanos
Posted 15 January 2012 - 10:52 AM
Looking at the photos of it on the 20 deg list looks like the power was out, No lights inside seem to be going. Only the lights that you want for using the life rafts are going and they should be able to be supplied from a deck level emergency generator.
From the second video, it appears that the ship spent quite some time at only a moderate list (20 degrees or so) and with decks well out of the water, rather than going over at-all quickly.
So as to why anyone would be trapped below would seem a question.
Hopefully it will turn out that most or all of the unaccounted-for persons simply never were aboard, or were aboard but escaped safely and, well, just haven't been accounted for.
As for the captain being arrested, my understanding is that this has no real implication: it's just what they do there in cases at all like this.
I do have to say that it's a poor show of him to have left the ship so long as there was any rescuing to be done that he could direct or aid. What was his rush? Was starting to get hungry, and the food service staff had already vamoosed?
The boat went down in hours, I actually think they did a fairly good job of getting 4000+ of in the dark.
The news reports keep metioning the "Icy waters" Does anyone know what water temps are there? Cold yes but icy?
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:41 PM
If they lost less than 100 ( aprox. 4 percent) we are very lucky.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:25 PM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:37 PM
16 minutes of no AIS position, I reckon this is what happened
Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:48 PM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:54 PM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 02:19 PM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 03:39 PM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 04:03 PM
This a link to an article in Italian. They make a quite accurate reconstruction of what happened.
My link
Anyone want to translate? I can take a wild guess as to what this part of the link above means:
...-gravissima-negligenza-...
That doesn't sound good.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 04:07 PM
The propellers were stll spinning when the boat rolled, do you know what sound they made?
Dago wop wop wop wop wop wop..............
Posted 15 January 2012 - 04:23 PM
"Uncharted rock takes out mammoth cruise ship"These things are top-heavy. There was a cruise ship a few years ago that had an autopilot malfunction in the straights of Juan de Fuca that turned the ship so hard that it listed to within a few degrees of going over. An N A told me that the CG is something like a third the way up the hull from the WL on these things. Rocks do move because of earthquakes. We slid up on a rock in BC a few years ago. CTow puled us off, tied us to his boat, and then rammed us right back on the rock. "that's not supposed to be there". he said. And according to the charts it wasn't. But there it was. Is this island an active earthquake zone?
Loss of life sucks. Poseidon adventure. God help anyone disabled on that ship.
Kind of wonder if the charts had been updated with all the budget problems in Italy. Surveys cost euros.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 04:47 PM
Joseph Conrad's reflections on the sinking of the Titanic:
http://www.online-li...and-letters/23/
Not a lot has changed in the "bigger must be better" department.
Cheers,
Earl
Posted 15 January 2012 - 05:28 PM
Google Translate always churns out some awful-ass pidgin English, so I can't be sure I got the whole thing right. And I don't mean the following to exonerate the captain. But....
This a link to an article in Italian. They make a quite accurate reconstruction of what happened.
My link
Anyone want to translate? I can take a wild guess as to what this part of the link above means:
...-gravissima-negligenza-...
That doesn't sound good.
(This is a Google translate)
Giglio Porto-The tragedy of the Costa Concordia is incredible for its dynamic. How can an ultra-modern cruise ship, 290 meters long and 35.5 wide with a draft of 8.2 meters, take a rock in the Tyrrhenian Sea and capsizing, killing some three dozen people and a few scattered?
...........
As for the victims, whose family goes our solidarity, to disperse, the wounded, rescue procedures, to where he was the master, when he left the ship, this is not the place to talk about it. There is enough support once again, and we believe we have demonstrated with simple navigation calculations, that in that part of the sea cliff that no one can take a ship like that, except for an error, even worse, to culpable negligence is not tolerated by the uffciali in command and a shipping company. The rocks of Scole, including dry when thousands of divers have plunged in recent years, there have always been and everyone knows it. A vessel of 290 meters from there can not and must not pass. The arrest ordered by the prosecution of Grosseto should certainly only the first step of a story, we repeat, absolutely baffling to anyone going to sea.
New! Click the words above to view alternate translations. Dismiss
Google Translate for Business:Translator ToolkitWebsite TranslatorGlobal Market Finder
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users