Jump to content


VOR Leg 4


  • Please log in to reply
1279 replies to this topic

#301 Somtam Cowboy

Somtam Cowboy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 592 posts
  • Location:Phuket .Thailand

Posted 24 February 2012 - 02:29 AM

Ahhh.....Maybe the stb rudders broken on Puma..... :unsure:

I'd have caused a mutiny aboard by now....

FAAAARC!!!

HELM DOWN GUYS!!!!!

#302 onimod

onimod

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 993 posts
  • Location:Sydney
  • Interests:Cannot be left blank

Posted 24 February 2012 - 02:30 AM

Telefonica has caught up a lot of their losses in the last 2 scheds.
I wonder if it's going to turn out like the start of leg 2 where all the boats were completely limited by the front they all butted into.
I think ADOR has actually been the (net) quickest overall since Taiwan.

#303 smackdaddy

smackdaddy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,752 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 02:30 AM




One thing I honestly don't know is the real responsibility split between skipper and navigator on these boats. Kenny would have to sign off on these decisions I assume - but is it a case where Addis is not presenting him the best options? How does that work?

The thing that makes it hard for me is it really seems like Kenny is a tremendous driver - and he's very, very good at managing the team. So it just seems to point to bad strategy. And these problems coming in at Puma's loss of Cape (compared to how well he's doing on Tele), sure points to Addis as the issue.


Dude, enough of your uninformed comments please. Keep it in your pants. Speculating who is good and who is bad on a boat, when by the sounds of it you have not done an offshore race, let alone anything close to tactician, nav, or skipper, is just not on. Particularly on pro sailors that have as much experience and skill as this bunch.

Thanks


Those little squiggly things at the end of the string of words up there are question marks.


He has a point, though. Really appreciate your enthusiasm for the event, but some of your posts have been pretty spectacularly uninformed. It is certainly not necessary to be an expert to participate in this thread (as you yourself stated), but a little less shooting from the hip and a bit more thought before posting could dramatically improve the quality of your contributions here.


Well, here's the deal. I'm a fan of the VOR. A huge fan. I'm not a pro by any means...I make no claim at being "spectacularly informed". So what I post is purely what a US-based rabid fan thinks and sees while watching a damn compelling sporting event.

It's all shooting from the hip - because I, like any interested fan, have to try to make sense of it based on my very limited off-shore racing experience. If I had more "thought", I'd "contribute" it. I just don't. Because I'm a fan.

To give you some perspective on that, I summoned The Google on this whole Navigator/Skipper relationship question. Here's what I got:

http://www.yachtraci...positions1.html

http://yachtpals.com/stan-honey-4177

http://www.sailingma...Scankillyou.htm

http://www.volvoocea...al-options.html

So, again, as an uninformed-yet-compelled-and-somewhat-experienced fan, if you guys can't answer the questions...okay...no harm no foul. You're in the same boat as me. If you can answer them, but have some bar that I need to jump over before you'll answer them...well....screw that.

I'm just saying it's not that easy to become "spectacularly informed" without asking some pretty basic questions. And The Google kind of sucks at that. So?

#304 LoopyGirdleSniffer

LoopyGirdleSniffer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,406 posts
  • Location:Barbados

Posted 24 February 2012 - 02:32 AM




One thing I honestly don't know is the real responsibility split between skipper and navigator on these boats. Kenny would have to sign off on these decisions I assume - but is it a case where Addis is not presenting him the best options? How does that work?

The thing that makes it hard for me is it really seems like Kenny is a tremendous driver - and he's very, very good at managing the team. So it just seems to point to bad strategy. And these problems coming in at Puma's loss of Cape (compared to how well he's doing on Tele), sure points to Addis as the issue.


Dude, enough of your uninformed comments please. Keep it in your pants. Speculating who is good and who is bad on a boat, when by the sounds of it you have not done an offshore race, let alone anything close to tactician, nav, or skipper, is just not on. Particularly on pro sailors that have as much experience and skill as this bunch.

Thanks


Those little squiggly things at the end of the string of words up there are question marks.


He has a point, though. Really appreciate your enthusiasm for the event, but some of your posts have been pretty spectacularly uninformed. It is certainly not necessary to be an expert to participate in this thread (as you yourself stated), but a little less shooting from the hip and a bit more thought before posting could dramatically improve the quality of your contributions here.

So where else do you suggest asking these types of questions if you really are interested in the answers. Seems to me that some of you get all high and mighty when someone who may or may not know starts asking legitimate questions. Like it's the most obvious thing in the world. Fuck you for that(not you personally but the other idiot who was spewing retardation) a question is a question. If it's uninformed then edumacate him. If it's not. . . shit it's still a question so edumacate him.

#305 smackdaddy

smackdaddy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,752 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 02:34 AM





One thing I honestly don't know is the real responsibility split between skipper and navigator on these boats. Kenny would have to sign off on these decisions I assume - but is it a case where Addis is not presenting him the best options? How does that work?

The thing that makes it hard for me is it really seems like Kenny is a tremendous driver - and he's very, very good at managing the team. So it just seems to point to bad strategy. And these problems coming in at Puma's loss of Cape (compared to how well he's doing on Tele), sure points to Addis as the issue.


Dude, enough of your uninformed comments please. Keep it in your pants. Speculating who is good and who is bad on a boat, when by the sounds of it you have not done an offshore race, let alone anything close to tactician, nav, or skipper, is just not on. Particularly on pro sailors that have as much experience and skill as this bunch.

Thanks


Those little squiggly things at the end of the string of words up there are question marks.


He has a point, though. Really appreciate your enthusiasm for the event, but some of your posts have been pretty spectacularly uninformed. It is certainly not necessary to be an expert to participate in this thread (as you yourself stated), but a little less shooting from the hip and a bit more thought before posting could dramatically improve the quality of your contributions here.

So where else do you suggest asking these types of questions if you really are interested in the answers. Seems to me that some of you get all high and mighty when someone who may or may not know starts asking legitimate questions. Like it's the most obvious thing in the world. Fuck you for that(not you personally but the other idiot who was spewing retardation) a question is a question. If it's uninformed then edumacate him. If it's not. . . shit it's still a question so edumacate him.


Thanks loop.

#306 Ballast Technician

Ballast Technician

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,157 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 03:23 AM





One thing I honestly don't know is the real responsibility split between skipper and navigator on these boats. Kenny would have to sign off on these decisions I assume - but is it a case where Addis is not presenting him the best options? How does that work?

The thing that makes it hard for me is it really seems like Kenny is a tremendous driver - and he's very, very good at managing the team. So it just seems to point to bad strategy. And these problems coming in at Puma's loss of Cape (compared to how well he's doing on Tele), sure points to Addis as the issue.


Dude, enough of your uninformed comments please. Keep it in your pants. Speculating who is good and who is bad on a boat, when by the sounds of it you have not done an offshore race, let alone anything close to tactician, nav, or skipper, is just not on. Particularly on pro sailors that have as much experience and skill as this bunch.

Thanks


Those little squiggly things at the end of the string of words up there are question marks.


He has a point, though. Really appreciate your enthusiasm for the event, but some of your posts have been pretty spectacularly uninformed. It is certainly not necessary to be an expert to participate in this thread (as you yourself stated), but a little less shooting from the hip and a bit more thought before posting could dramatically improve the quality of your contributions here.

So where else do you suggest asking these types of questions if you really are interested in the answers. Seems to me that some of you get all high and mighty when someone who may or may not know starts asking legitimate questions. Like it's the most obvious thing in the world. Fuck you for that(not you personally but the other idiot who was spewing retardation) a question is a question. If it's uninformed then edumacate him. If it's not. . . shit it's still a question so edumacate him.


Note that I was not criticizing him for his question(s) per se - generally no problem with that. Rather, what I am taking issue with are his bold speculations/insinuations ("Addis is the issue" WTF?) and statements that frequently lack any base in what is really happening in the race and/or fly the face of basic sailing knowledge.
Nobody expects him (or anybody else) to be "spectacularly informed" (BTW nice strawman that, smackdaddy) and there is nothing wrong with asking questions - more than happy to participate in the conversation and share information. But if one just "know[s] a few basic bits" (his words) and hopes to learn from others, common courtesy would suggest not shooting one's mouth off all the time and holding back on the grand proclamations a bit...

#307 Somtam Cowboy

Somtam Cowboy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 592 posts
  • Location:Phuket .Thailand

Posted 24 February 2012 - 03:25 AM

HELM DOWN!!!!!!

Sorry for shouting....but they don't seem to be listening..... :huh:

#308 Cheap Beer

Cheap Beer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Location:Seattle, WA

Posted 24 February 2012 - 03:59 AM

HELM DOWN!!!!!!

Sorry for shouting....but they don't seem to be listening..... :huh:



Fuckit, heading for Hawaii and a Mai Tai.

#309 bombarie

bombarie

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 42 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 04:11 AM

Let's keep the faith guys. Puma is on a roll, they are pulling something so brilliant that we just can't see it yet. Must be inside knowledge on that Northerly starting to blow for real soon now, that's going to be an epic reach for Hawaii. Expedition, we need you sir!

#310 Somtam Cowboy

Somtam Cowboy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 592 posts
  • Location:Phuket .Thailand

Posted 24 February 2012 - 04:24 AM


HELM DOWN!!!!!!

Sorry for shouting....but they don't seem to be listening..... :huh:



Fuckit, heading for Hawaii and a Mai Tai.


Even Hawaii would be fine....
More like the hot baths in Okinawa with an Asahi beer in hand...WTF!
I'll eat my hat if they pull this one off...
Way better than the Froggies effort in Leg 1.

#311 tamaozy

tamaozy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 212 posts
  • Location:Newport News, Virginia.

Posted 24 February 2012 - 04:32 AM

just trying to get my head around what their objectives are. Do we think they are aiming for 140.....150....160 eastings before they start to head south. Seems a bloody long way to go to me or is that Ocean racing. From the last three legs it seems there is a bit more chasing the breeze than I was aware of. Does anyone know where Expedition is, can we expect some informed naviguessing anytime soon.

Meanwhile, I am not sure Hawaii is that way either, maybe Puma fear coming home and are looking into defecting. I heard if you go far enough north you can probably "see Russia Alaska from there".

#312 rule69

rule69

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,671 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 04:35 AM

There is method in their madness. If, or maybe IF the models hold they expect the leaders to be forced south off the front of the building H and into light following winds. Then the leaders will have to jibe back to the North while P carries the breeze up to them... Could happen... Stranger things have happened. But, honestly, as I see it even if it all comes out perfectly for P I don't see them catching C or G... But that's eyeball routing. Expedition probably has a better take on it.

Edit: should add I presume something local and funky caused them to head N again and they'll be going E next sked... If not, I have no clue what they're up to.

#313 jc172528

jc172528

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,004 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 04:50 AM

Let's keep the faith guys. Puma is on a roll, they are pulling something so brilliant that we just can't see it yet. Must be inside knowledge on that Northerly starting to blow for real soon now, that's going to be an epic reach for Hawaii. Expedition, we need you sir!


Yeah they've seen something everyone else missed(?)
It'll either be a MASSIVE gain or a MASSIVE loss.

But fark me -150nm already, that's tough.




#314 Alysum

Alysum

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 280 posts
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 24 February 2012 - 04:59 AM

Puma is seriously going to run out of food if they continue their cruise up north!

#315 smackdaddy

smackdaddy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,752 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 05:10 AM

Puma is seriously going to run out of food if they continue their cruise up north!


Maybe they're counting on a nice fresh Addis and a couple of biscuits? Heh-heh.

#316 bombarie

bombarie

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 42 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 05:29 AM

The VOR site had an article earlier today wherein Tom Addis explained that "the plan is be furthest east once the fleet turns south". Assuming this is not an act of psychological warfare from Addis to confuse the rest of the fleet, it may tie in with the observations above that Puma is positioning for the Mai Tais in Hawaii. Or close -- they need to get to 170 long to clear Papua New Guinea (I remember well from the 2008/09 VOR game -- don't go there). But what's the rationale -- I googled and it appears that "A squared + B squared = C squared" also applies on a sphere; so it only makes sense if they believe sailing a direct southeast course is even more costly. And on that everyone seems to agree for now...so I'd like to think that Puma is investing in a mind bogglingly great next week....an Epic Reach, and steering clear of the uncertain winds that Rule69 referred to above, that may require the rest to steer North in due course --- crossing Puma's by then days old wake?

#317 dogwatch

dogwatch

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,749 posts
  • Location:South Coast, UK
  • Interests:Racing in all forms.

Posted 24 February 2012 - 07:22 AM

"One thing I honestly don't know is the real responsibility split between skipper and navigator on these boats."

I've nothing to do with the VOR. I've done 3 Fastnets and a bunch of similar shorter (100-200 mile) events. Done some navigating. Done some skippering (but not of ocean races). So I think I know something but less than some others here.

First thing, not all boats run the same. Some have a command and control style. Some are more inclusive in decision-making. I don't mean "democracy" but I do mean discussion, at least involving a core of the crew. IMO the first works better for short round-the-buoys racing and the second works better for ocean racing where most (not all) of the time, very rapid decisions aren't needed.

On the whole I'd say, navigator advises, skipper decides. If the skipper regularly decides to ignore the advice, then the navigator's position is untenable.

#318 dogwatch

dogwatch

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,749 posts
  • Location:South Coast, UK
  • Interests:Racing in all forms.

Posted 24 February 2012 - 08:35 AM

Let's keep the faith guys. Puma is on a roll, they are pulling something so brilliant that we just can't see it yet.


I've been racing for 30 years and I'm yet to see a race where the quickest route to the next mark involves sailing directly away from it. But there's a first time for everything. If it pays for them I will be impressed. Also surprised.

#319 Tunnel Rat

Tunnel Rat

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,311 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 08:54 AM

Puma looks to have tacked again, the tracker says they are heading 035, but the graphic and the track appear more like 350, maybe the tracker is dyslexic!

I am sure there are much smarter guys than me on Puma, but I can't understand their strategy.

#320 Potter

Potter

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,015 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 08:54 AM


Let's keep the faith guys. Puma is on a roll, they are pulling something so brilliant that we just can't see it yet.


I've been racing for 30 years and I'm yet to see a race where the quickest route to the next mark involves sailing directly away from it. But there's a first time for everything. If it pays for them I will be impressed. Also surprised.

I would tend to agree, in general the fastest route is the shortest. However there are a number of examples where the longest route has worked.
Some obvious examples: The first VO70 race when on the long leg they passed through a gate near NZ and then ABN2 (I think?) then turned round and went back north.
On the route from Europe to the SOUthern Ocean or South Africa you will end up going away from the mark to get around the high. Most obvious in the BWR when Virbac and Foncia sailed around the rest of the fleet.
BAnque Pop record run at the start of the year. In the North Atlantic they were sailing away from the finish to get the fastest route.
Leg 2 - Groupama sailed South and around the fleet, but then lost it in the doldrums.

So, maybe, just maybe, Puma can do something.

#321 punter

punter

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,473 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 09:56 AM



Let's keep the faith guys. Puma is on a roll, they are pulling something so brilliant that we just can't see it yet.


I've been racing for 30 years and I'm yet to see a race where the quickest route to the next mark involves sailing directly away from it. But there's a first time for everything. If it pays for them I will be impressed. Also surprised.

I would tend to agree, in general the fastest route is the shortest. However there are a number of examples where the longest route has worked.
Some obvious examples: The first VO70 race when on the long leg they passed through a gate near NZ and then ABN2 (I think?) then turned round and went back north.
On the route from Europe to the SOUthern Ocean or South Africa you will end up going away from the mark to get around the high. Most obvious in the BWR when Virbac and Foncia sailed around the rest of the fleet.
BAnque Pop record run at the start of the year. In the North Atlantic they were sailing away from the finish to get the fastest route.
Leg 2 - Groupama sailed South and around the fleet, but then lost it in the doldrums.

So, maybe, just maybe, Puma can do something.


Believe that was Ericsson 3 in the last race from Qingdao to Brazil. Went through the gate for points scoring and then did an almost u-turn to get above a system.

#322 onimod

onimod

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 993 posts
  • Location:Sydney
  • Interests:Cannot be left blank

Posted 24 February 2012 - 10:26 AM

Ha - the map on the tracker has been changed to show Japan.

#323 tekwa

tekwa

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 85 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 11:27 AM




Let's keep the faith guys. Puma is on a roll, they are pulling something so brilliant that we just can't see it yet.


I've been racing for 30 years and I'm yet to see a race where the quickest route to the next mark involves sailing directly away from it. But there's a first time for everything. If it pays for them I will be impressed. Also surprised.

I would tend to agree, in general the fastest route is the shortest. However there are a number of examples where the longest route has worked.
Some obvious examples: The first VO70 race when on the long leg they passed through a gate near NZ and then ABN2 (I think?) then turned round and went back north.
On the route from Europe to the SOUthern Ocean or South Africa you will end up going away from the mark to get around the high. Most obvious in the BWR when Virbac and Foncia sailed around the rest of the fleet.
BAnque Pop record run at the start of the year. In the North Atlantic they were sailing away from the finish to get the fastest route.
Leg 2 - Groupama sailed South and around the fleet, but then lost it in the doldrums.

So, maybe, just maybe, Puma can do something.


Believe that was Ericsson 3 in the last race from Qingdao to Brazil. Went through the gate for points scoring and then did an almost u-turn to get above a system.




do you guys remember what happed in Virtual Volvo Race on the long leg last time? I know it was virual only, but...

#324 Carboninit

Carboninit

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,200 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 12:00 PM

Puma have over cooked it .Good idea looking at the weather scheds earlier on .By the time they turn its too late for them to catch up on the easterlies coming in in 12 hours . Groupama have played it right setting the boat up for reaching.Can Puma catch up 226 miles in 12 hours ,I do not think so.

#325 14395

14395

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 69 posts
  • Interests:sailing

Posted 24 February 2012 - 02:25 PM

Although it seems odd to all of us that Puma keeps going North, if you track the wind over the next 72 hours, it shows that Puma could be on a run heading east with some strong winds. This would push them well east of the fleet in a short time. Although they would have to make up the fact that they are 200nm north of the fleet. I see this similar to the move in the 3rd leg, where they find themselves around 3rd/4th place when they join the leaders, which would put them in better shape. If they would have stayed on the same path as the leaders, they would have continued to fall behind and stay in last place. When you're last you gotta try something, right?

#326 smackdaddy

smackdaddy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,752 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 02:28 PM

"One thing I honestly don't know is the real responsibility split between skipper and navigator on these boats."

I've nothing to do with the VOR. I've done 3 Fastnets and a bunch of similar shorter (100-200 mile) events. Done some navigating. Done some skippering (but not of ocean races). So I think I know something but less than some others here.

First thing, not all boats run the same. Some have a command and control style. Some are more inclusive in decision-making. I don't mean "democracy" but I do mean discussion, at least involving a core of the crew. IMO the first works better for short round-the-buoys racing and the second works better for ocean racing where most (not all) of the time, very rapid decisions aren't needed.

On the whole I'd say, navigator advises, skipper decides. If the skipper regularly decides to ignore the advice, then the navigator's position is untenable.


Thanks for the explanation dog. That helps.

#327 Carboninit

Carboninit

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,200 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 03:31 PM

Although it seems odd to all of us that Puma keeps going North, if you track the wind over the next 72 hours, it shows that Puma could be on a run heading east with some strong winds. This would push them well east of the fleet in a short time. Although they would have to make up the fact that they are 200nm north of the fleet. I see this similar to the move in the 3rd leg, where they find themselves around 3rd/4th place when they join the leaders, which would put them in better shape. If they would have stayed on the same path as the leaders, they would have continued to fall behind and stay in last place. When you're last you gotta try something, right?


Yep What would have happened if Telefonica had stayed in instead of tacking to the fleet ,They would have been away in the easterlies by now heading to NZ.It has to be an absolute nightmare for the navigessor. Buffalo Girls.

#328 richie

richie

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 610 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 03:36 PM

..."So, will PUMA’s gamble pay off?

Volvo Ocean Race chief meteorologist Gonzalo Infante said the next 24 hours would prove critical for Ken Read and his crew.

“PUMA’s timing could be just right, and if they are lucky they will pick up the new breeze long before the rest of the fleet,” Infante said.

“It is a critical time for them now.”...

...just sit conformable in your "lazy-boyz"...and watch your blue screens...I'm with Kenny...Hope he'll pull this off...!! Strong Winds Puma !!!




#329 Carboninit

Carboninit

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,200 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 04:01 PM

If you call Puma buffalo girls ,then i know what you are talking about .The next 24 hours will tell us if its right. I dont think they are . I will go for Groupama. It will be interesting what Ador will do.Will any 24 hour records go when the wind picks up?

#330 smackdaddy

smackdaddy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,752 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 04:13 PM

This is what worries me...for obvious reasons:

Telefónica navigator Andrew Cape was clearly surprised by the move.

"Phew!" he said. "They were next to us yesterday when we were in the light winds. They chose to go north to get the breeze and it's... interesting. I mean, once they get the breeze they are looking for they will be on course and going quite well, but they have some catching up to do.”



#331 richie

richie

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 610 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 04:23 PM

This is what worries me...for obvious reasons:

Telefónica navigator Andrew Cape was clearly surprised by the move.

"Phew!" he said. "They were next to us yesterday when we were in the light winds. They chose to go north to get the breeze and it's... interesting. I mean, once they get the breeze they are looking for they will be on course and going quite well, but they have some catching up to do."


desperate times call for desperate measures

Don't worry Mate...Everything It's Gonna be All Right...;)

#332 bombarie

bombarie

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 42 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 04:33 PM

Yes sire....Puma is in 20 knots of Northerlies. Hit the timer -- Operation "Fetch and Devour" has begun, next turning point 150 East.

#333 richie

richie

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 610 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 04:44 PM

Yes sire....Puma is in 20 knots of Northerlies. Hit the timer -- Operation "Fetch and Devour" has begun, next turning point 150 East.

...sure hope so...but a long time to gooooo....

#334 J24_guy

J24_guy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 208 posts
  • Location:Marion, MA

Posted 24 February 2012 - 05:06 PM


Yes sire....Puma is in 20 knots of Northerlies. Hit the timer -- Operation "Fetch and Devour" has begun, next turning point 150 East.

...sure hope so...but a long time to gooooo....




I'm starting to see the light. KR is crazy like a fox. The thing that's easy to forget is how far east Auckland is -- like 170 or something. Looks like there are a couple of weather systems coming at them. In about 12-18 hours, they should be able to bear away and get moving in a breeze which will be exclusively theirs for a while. To establish leverage over the fleet though, they kind of have to wait until the fleet gets some breeze and bears away toward the south. Puma can keep going east for a few hours, then bear away themselves. But what's the real advantage to doing so? ... at that point everyone should be in basically identical trade breezes. Puma will have a slightly better angle, but that's a lot of distance to make up. Definitely iffy, but potentially brilliant.

#335 richie

richie

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 610 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 05:08 PM


Yes sire....Puma is in 20 knots of Northerlies. Hit the timer -- Operation "Fetch and Devour" has begun, next turning point 150 East.

...sure hope so...but a long time to gooooo....

...and they should start turning around 140E...IMO :rolleyes:

#336 bombarie

bombarie

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 42 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 05:22 PM

[/quote]
...sure hope so...but a long time to gooooo....
[/quote]

Puma set for rendez-vous with Fleet @ 146 E, 21.5 N by Monday noon ET time.

Or what's left of the Fleet at that time -- wonder whether anyone will dare to break South early. Where's Expedition -- we need 'em.

#337 Carboninit

Carboninit

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,200 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 05:58 PM

I think the boat speeds tell it all.The speeds they are travelling Puma Abu .I cant see it.Its great to see the boats on the ocean at last.

#338 Liquid

Liquid

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,269 posts
  • Location:Portland, OR area

Posted 24 February 2012 - 06:27 PM

Believe that was Ericsson 3 in the last race from Qingdao to Brazil. Went through the gate for points scoring and then did an almost u-turn to get above a system.


and they subsequently won that leg, right?

#339 Vorwaerts

Vorwaerts

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 285 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 07:12 PM


Believe that was Ericsson 3 in the last race from Qingdao to Brazil. Went through the gate for points scoring and then did an almost u-turn to get above a system.


and they subsequently won that leg, right?


Yes. And I guess it played a role in the fact that Magdal became Navigator on Sanya.

#340 nixon

nixon

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 206 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 11:09 PM

I just don't know what to think about Puma's move. Risky is the first word that comes to mind.

This is the course to keep things in perspective
Attached File  longway.png   70.6K   102 downloads

GFS now (0000 25022012)
Attached File  now.jpg   353.38K   123 downloads

GFS 24 hr (0000 26022012)
Attached File  24hrs.jpg   349.41K   99 downloads

#341 sheeting yarns

sheeting yarns

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 388 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 03:18 AM

Puma is at present 282 miles behind Camper and Camper is directly between Puma and Auckland. What kind of mileage are you going to have to do to go round the outside and into the lead? It would surely have to be about 600 additional miles? I hope Puma can make the in port race in Auckland. It seems like this leg is going to be a long one for all the boats.

#342 bombarie

bombarie

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 42 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 04:15 AM

There's about 200nm west / east separation between Puma and Camper / Groupama, and if the VOR tracker is somewhat accurate, Puma should be making big gains on the leaders in the next 18 hours; cause they are sailing into a bit of a hole. Telefonica went North in anticipation of shit wind ahead, so it seems. So let's say Cape is right, then that doesn't bode well for Camper / Groupama. So Puma closes in, and rolls over them. And we'll deal with the North / South separation later on....?

If you lay the line for current position of Camper / Groupama to the Westcoast of Fiji, and then down to Auckland due South...that's about 8700 km (sorry that site www afstandmeten nl doesn't do nm). Do the same from Puma's current spot, to same place in front of Fiji, that's about 9000km. Add more Easterly to the track and that's another 1000 miles or so.

This is long from settled!

#343 Cheap Beer

Cheap Beer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Location:Seattle, WA

Posted 25 February 2012 - 04:41 AM

Uh, looks like the rest of the fleet is freak'in and heading north around the hole. Puma up to 17.3 kts. This is getting interesting, to say the least.

#344 GnarlyItWas

GnarlyItWas

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 557 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 04:51 AM

Tracker shows Puma ^ 30 this sched and 6-7 quicker than the fleet

#345 nixon

nixon

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 206 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 05:24 AM

I can imagine the sense of relief on Puma when that last update came in and they saw that the rest of the fleet is heading North again. Their move may be a good or a bad call, but to have the rest of the fleet heading your way - or at least towards your way - well... their arseholes may have just unpuckered a tiny bit. Pretty nerve racking taking a flier like that against a fleet like this - even if it was the 'cards they were dealt' as they passed Taiwan.

#346 the paradox of thrift

the paradox of thrift

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,376 posts
  • Location:Mos-Vegas
  • Interests:I like sailing

Posted 25 February 2012 - 05:47 AM

Before Puma fans run out and chop themselves, the weather routing shows less than an hours difference to NZ between Camper and Puma (36 minutes actually).

The main pack have been able to keep sailing the making board east for a number of days - but the breeze is going to die out in front of them now and they're going to have to head north (they gybed north in the last sched) to join Puma. The could try to punch through very light breeze to the Easterlies - but I don't reckon any of them would want to risk that while the whole fleet is following the same strategy.

Attached File  nth vs south.jpg   742.66K   180 downloads

The pink route is Puma currently. The green route is recommended for Camper - I've put a 'no sail' zone in front of them to tell the routing not to sail into the lighter breeze. The red route then suggests to go north and close up with Puma.

In two days time the tracker won't resemble this one bit but it does offer some perspective on what the navigators are looking at.

Puma has done the northing and can get much further east now with good numbers. That will set them up for small gains the whole 4000nm down the Pacific. What they've done is still a very speculative and high-risk move but the logic is quite clear and if they have a bit of luck it could turn out to be a winner. I wouldn't characterise it as insane - as some have here.

Looking at the tracker and the weather - one thing for sure is it would be very hard work for the crews out there with very variable winds and heaps of sail changes. They have all been going through the gears constantly, working hard to try to make gains and stem losses. The psychology of sailing the wrong way would be getting to them too.

The forecast for 3-4 days time has a period of very fresh (maybe 30-40kts) ENE breeze which will be demanding sailing. The relative differences in boat speed will probably not be as important as the boat handling and seamanship shown by the crews. Broken gear and sails will cause very big losses.

If I were on Groupama or Camper I'd be foccussing on each other and Telefonica. It has no real bearing on the overall race if Puma ends up leading. Where there's everything to play for in the main group. Telefonica is 80-100 miles behind Camper so I'd say they'd be wanting to prevent that gap getting wider and somehow stay in touch.

#347 thetruth

thetruth

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,467 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 07:21 AM

Great summation. Camper starting to look vunerable again, bow up and slow in comparison to Groupama..........................



Before Puma fans run out and chop themselves, the weather routing shows less than an hours difference to NZ between Camper and Puma (36 minutes actually).

The main pack have been able to keep sailing the making board east for a number of days - but the breeze is going to die out in front of them now and they're going to have to head north (they gybed north in the last sched) to join Puma. The could try to punch through very light breeze to the Easterlies - but I don't reckon any of them would want to risk that while the whole fleet is following the same strategy.

Attached File  nth vs south.jpg   742.66K   180 downloads

The pink route is Puma currently. The green route is recommended for Camper - I've put a 'no sail' zone in front of them to tell the routing not to sail into the lighter breeze. The red route then suggests to go north and close up with Puma.

In two days time the tracker won't resemble this one bit but it does offer some perspective on what the navigators are looking at.

Puma has done the northing and can get much further east now with good numbers. That will set them up for small gains the whole 4000nm down the Pacific. What they've done is still a very speculative and high-risk move but the logic is quite clear and if they have a bit of luck it could turn out to be a winner. I wouldn't characterise it as insane - as some have here.

Looking at the tracker and the weather - one thing for sure is it would be very hard work for the crews out there with very variable winds and heaps of sail changes. They have all been going through the gears constantly, working hard to try to make gains and stem losses. The psychology of sailing the wrong way would be getting to them too.

The forecast for 3-4 days time has a period of very fresh (maybe 30-40kts) ENE breeze which will be demanding sailing. The relative differences in boat speed will probably not be as important as the boat handling and seamanship shown by the crews. Broken gear and sails will cause very big losses.

If I were on Groupama or Camper I'd be foccussing on each other and Telefonica. It has no real bearing on the overall race if Puma ends up leading. Where there's everything to play for in the main group. Telefonica is 80-100 miles behind Camper so I'd say they'd be wanting to prevent that gap getting wider and somehow stay in touch.



#348 oioi

oioi

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 578 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 07:39 AM

I agree, looks like groupama are through into a better position than camper. Ador may also sneak past. Camper held the south too long.

#349 Carboninit

Carboninit

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,200 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 11:05 AM

Errrr when are the fleet going to head south? It would have been great if Telefonica had kept to there original move before tacking back to the fleet.

#350 onimod

onimod

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 993 posts
  • Location:Sydney
  • Interests:Cannot be left blank

Posted 25 February 2012 - 11:10 AM

Errrr when are the fleet going to head south? It would have been great if Telefonica had kept to there original move before tacking back to the fleet.


I agree - I think Tele may have had a tough couple of days... hindsight.
They really had to follow Camper and to a lesser extent Groupama though.

I don't see the window south opening fro around 3 days - can that be right?

The Groupama website stories are always remarkably candid:
http://www.cammas-gr..._equipe_353.jsp
(last two paragraphs)

#351 Carboninit

Carboninit

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,200 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 11:19 AM

onimod
Campa 088
Groupama 069
Puma 093

Campa going up to Puma to cover and Puma coming down at speed . The group should go south ,yes they will slow down with the weather so will Puma . They are going the wrong way . I reckon they are trying to get east to cover the layline .Weather systems move ,they have not apart from Puma .Very Interesting leg.

#352 richie

richie

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 610 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 03:43 PM

...got to admit...it's a very difficult part of the world to predict the weather...so it's up to the crews with ...well,the thing to do it...;)...balls...guts whatever ??

#353 fsans

fsans

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 53 posts
  • Location:Barcelona

Posted 25 February 2012 - 04:09 PM

Errrr when are the fleet going to head south? It would have been great if Telefonica had kept to there original move before tacking back to the fleet.

In his last telephone interview, Cape claimed yesterday he still thought that the southern route TELE started and later aborted was a winning idea. Anyway, if they had taken forward its plan had influenced the whole flet decisions, probably.

#354 smackdaddy

smackdaddy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,752 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 04:56 PM

Puma is at present 282 miles behind Camper and Camper is directly between Puma and Auckland. What kind of mileage are you going to have to do to go round the outside and into the lead? It would surely have to be about 600 additional miles? I hope Puma can make the in port race in Auckland. It seems like this leg is going to be a long one for all the boats.


Since this post yesterday they've made up 114 miles. I was skeptical - but now with 3 boats chasing Puma north, I'm starting to believe.

Wow.

#355 Indio

Indio

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,716 posts
  • Location:Auckland

Posted 25 February 2012 - 05:00 PM

The Puma freight train is not showing any slowing down...been consistently over 19kts!! 160nm behind in their own private weather, with a hole developing 24-36 hours out and below the fleet should play right into Puma's plans. Telefonica looks like the first to veer off south - this is easily the most interesting leg so far.

#356 bombarie

bombarie

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 42 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 05:57 PM

Not worth much, but if we assume Groupama continues on current course and maintains its "average speed" on the VOR site (whatever that is), and Puma does the same, then Groupama will cross the wake of Puma four hours after Puma sailed through that zone. In another 11 hours or so Puma should hit that spot, with Cammas then going through it 4 hours later. Just shows the extent of Puma's come back I'd say.

But the winds will go light in the next 12 hours -- hope they can stay ahead. Bigger winds ahead for the entire fleet. Wonder whether Telefonica is dipping South and decided to beat all the way to Fiji???

#357 Cyrille Hydrogene

Cyrille Hydrogene

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 491 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 25 February 2012 - 06:00 PM

This is all very open! G4 and AD are going north with Puma as Camper and Tele are staying south. Who is going to be right? I hope North is going to pay.

I'm also a bit disappointed to see that G4 isn't covering the two overall leaders Tele and Camper, knowing they have good performance downwind. Have they forgotten it's a points race?

#358 dogwatch

dogwatch

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,749 posts
  • Location:South Coast, UK
  • Interests:Racing in all forms.

Posted 25 February 2012 - 06:08 PM

^

If the forecast wind on the tracker is to be believed then in 12-18 hours time, south will be the place to be.

#359 fsans

fsans

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 53 posts
  • Location:Barcelona

Posted 25 February 2012 - 07:50 PM

Finally Cape convinced Iker to do a check. The next twelve hours very critical ... What a leg

Edit: East, West or middle Fiji "à la Bowe" ?

#360 Expedition

Expedition

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 191 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 08:01 PM

It is interesting. The GFS is forecasting the dead zone to fill slowly form the west, so the western boats will be able to make southing earlier. Of course, Puma will have a better angle once they get into the trades.

The main reason this has Camper and Tele losing ground is due to pressure differences in the GFS over the next 24 hours that may or may not be there.

That said, while is is fashionable to not like the GFS, it is actually a very good model.

GPMA 13d 05h 12m -6h 01m
ADOR 13d 06h 02m -5h 11m
PUMA 13d 08h 56m -2h 17m
CAMP 13d 11h 14m
SNYA 13d 12h 32m 1h 18m
TELE 13d 17h 41m 6h 27m

Attached Files



#361 rule69

rule69

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,671 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 08:17 PM

^^^ Thanks!

FWIW, back in the dark ages of computer wx models NGP seemed closer to reality more often than GFS in the equatorial and SW Pacific. These things are always getting updated so I don't know how things stand now but if the Navy has gotten around to producing enough days to run your route it might be fun to see how different it looks using NGP.

#362 Icedtea

Icedtea

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,175 posts
  • Location:Ireland

Posted 25 February 2012 - 08:27 PM

Christ well done to Puma, Read has some serious balls

#363 Gert

Gert

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 268 posts
  • Location:Tenerife

Posted 25 February 2012 - 08:29 PM

Very interesting to watch, and even if Puma will not win the leg, their current positioning looks much better than I would have imagined. I was definitely wrong in my judgement. I think Addis has saved his head and reputation. Extremely interesting to watch.

Edit:
But watching the VOR tracker I cannot but think that if any boat would have decided to go SE tightly around the Philippines waypoint, they would have suffered light winds first, and then nothing but upwind, but they would have been way closer to Auckland, and already on the right side of the high pressure ridge. All boats will still have to deal with light winds wherever they are.

#364 winchfodder

winchfodder

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 617 posts
  • Location:Carolina, USA

Posted 25 February 2012 - 10:06 PM

I remember the days when Mr Read was sailing and winning in J24's. He was far ahead of most of the fleet putting more time on the water to maximise crew efficiency in sail and boat handling; his tacking was just the best and he sailed the J24 flattest in the fleet. It was the proverbial 'no stone unturned to win' philosophy and no need to bang corners.

So how come he is feeling that he has to bang corners so hard when he is at the top of the pro sailing game. Last leg he turned right, way away from the fleet, and in the end only lost say 30 or 40 miles, he was fortunate.

This time he decided to turn left. It is a high risk game. Surely better to just go steady on the seconds, thirds and fourths that his boat is capable of rather than the hero to zero tactics he is at now.

It looks like he might even make this one pay, though I doubt it, the next 48 hours will tell, but it is not the 'percentage sailing' one would expect of a world champion.

Maybe he is just trying to make up for the first leg disaster and put his sponsors name in a high risk position, grabbing the headlines. "Puma ready to pounce". "Berg brings Puma to a halt"

Well at least he is making this travesty of a round the world race interesting, you have to give him that!

P.S On the latest sked I quite fancy the southern position of Telefonica. Looking at the forecasts on the VOR tracker they might get a nice ride on the rhumb line in the next 60 hours

#365 smackdaddy

smackdaddy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,752 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 10:55 PM

Well at least he is making this travesty of a round the world race interesting, you have to give him that!


I've seen this sentiment quite a bit. Granted I think the stealth zone thing was a bit ridonculous, and I didn't like the postponement of the L4 start - so I've bitched and moaned a bit too - but where exactly do you get this race being a "travesty"? What would a "non-travesty" round the world race look like to you?

#366 Port Tack Approach

Port Tack Approach

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 733 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 10:56 PM

This certainly is fun to watch! GO PUMA GO!

#367 winchfodder

winchfodder

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 617 posts
  • Location:Carolina, USA

Posted 25 February 2012 - 11:05 PM


Well at least he is making this travesty of a round the world race interesting, you have to give him that!


I've seen this sentiment quite a bit. Granted I think the stealth zone thing was a bit ridonculous, and I didn't like the postponement of the L4 start - so I've bitched and moaned a bit too - but where exactly do you get this race being a "travesty"? What would a "non-travesty" round the world race look like to you?


I guess I am a bit of a purist, so sort of deep into the south, roaring 40's and screaming 50's, past the great capes and in a relatively short time frame. And yes, the boat that wins should have sailed all the way around the world.

Though I have to admit the tactics in this leg are the most complex and fascinating.

#368 smackdaddy

smackdaddy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,752 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 11:08 PM



Well at least he is making this travesty of a round the world race interesting, you have to give him that!


I've seen this sentiment quite a bit. Granted I think the stealth zone thing was a bit ridonculous, and I didn't like the postponement of the L4 start - so I've bitched and moaned a bit too - but where exactly do you get this race being a "travesty"? What would a "non-travesty" round the world race look like to you?


I guess I am a bit of a purist, so sort of deep into the south, roaring 40's and screaming 50's, past the great capes snd in a relatively short time frame. And the boat that wins should have sailed all the way around the world.

Though I have to admit the tactics in this leg are the most complex and fascinating.


Fair enough. That's why I like the Vendee. But I like the VOR precisely because of the mixing the off-shore and in-shore stuff. It's the full-spectrum of racing (as long as they stay off of ships).

#369 Indio

Indio

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,716 posts
  • Location:Auckland

Posted 26 February 2012 - 01:09 AM

Camper looks under threat from Groupama, Puma, AD and even Sanya. Telefonica looks like they're diving south to miss the unfriendly windless stretch Camper is in danger of falling into.

#370 bombarie

bombarie

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 42 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 05:23 AM

Very interesting to watch, and even if Puma will not win the leg, their current positioning looks much better than I would have imagined. I was definitely wrong in my judgement. I think Addis has saved his head and reputation. Extremely interesting to watch.

Edit:
But watching the VOR tracker I cannot but think that if any boat would have decided to go SE tightly around the Philippines waypoint, they would have suffered light winds first, and then nothing but upwind, but they would have been way closer to Auckland, and already on the right side of the high pressure ridge. All boats will still have to deal with light winds wherever they are.


Hi Gert --- its a mightly long beat to the East of Papua New Guinea man!

#371 dogwatch

dogwatch

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,749 posts
  • Location:South Coast, UK
  • Interests:Racing in all forms.

Posted 26 February 2012 - 06:44 AM

I remember the days when Mr Read was sailing and winning in J24's. He was far ahead of most of the fleet putting more time on the water to maximise crew efficiency in sail and boat handling; his tacking was just the best and he sailed the J24 flattest in the fleet. It was the proverbial 'no stone unturned to win' philosophy and no need to bang corners.


Including IIRC a rule 69 suspension for illegal hull modification, which seems to have been air-brushed out of history. Admit I'm dredging the memory banks here. Anyone remember more?

More positively, I also sailed J24s in that period and remember watching a video of Ken Read's team sailing downwind in a breeze. The work rate on the boat was staggeringly ahead of anything I'd previously seen. Made you think.

#372 nixon

nixon

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 206 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 08:06 AM


Very interesting to watch, and even if Puma will not win the leg, their current positioning looks much better than I would have imagined. I was definitely wrong in my judgement. I think Addis has saved his head and reputation. Extremely interesting to watch.

Edit:
But watching the VOR tracker I cannot but think that if any boat would have decided to go SE tightly around the Philippines waypoint, they would have suffered light winds first, and then nothing but upwind, but they would have been way closer to Auckland, and already on the right side of the high pressure ridge. All boats will still have to deal with light winds wherever they are.


Hi Gert --- its a mightly long beat to the East of Papua New Guinea man!


Just looking at the VOR tracker weather forecasts, which I believe are based on GFS, I wonder if a better route would have been to sit at the top of the Philippines for 2-3 days in drifting conditions and then head south south east when the breeze filled in. Would have been very painful waiting. I wonder if that scenario showed up in any of the earlier forecasts. Certainly looks as if they could have been going very nicely SE on the breeze - maybe 50deg twa - instead of floating around near Japan heading halfway to America and then waiting for some nice 100deg twa conditions to get South in. Be interesting to know if that weather pattern was present in the forecasts that sent them NE, or if it is something that has developed in the last day or so.

Kudos to Puma too - high risk strategy that would have scared the fruck out of me - they don't look great against Groupama (who came to join them), but they do look great against T4, who they were next to at Taiwan.

#373 dogwatch

dogwatch

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,749 posts
  • Location:South Coast, UK
  • Interests:Racing in all forms.

Posted 26 February 2012 - 08:16 AM

Puma..... do look great against T4, who they were next to at Taiwan.


There's a little low building to the SE with light airs in the middle and I think the best way around it is S then E. That, I think, is why we are seeing Camper and Telefonica positioning themselves S. Not certain Puma is going to be looking so great in 24 hours. Interesting and complex, for sure.

#374 Carboninit

Carboninit

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,200 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:14 AM


Puma..... do look great against T4, who they were next to at Taiwan.


There's a little low building to the SE with light airs in the middle and I think the best way around it is S then E. That, I think, is why we are seeing Camper and Telefonica positioning themselves S. Not certain Puma is going to be looking so great in 24 hours. Interesting and complex, for sure.


+1

#375 hermetic

hermetic

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 687 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 11:03 AM


I remember the days when Mr Read was sailing and winning in J24's. He was far ahead of most of the fleet putting more time on the water to maximise crew efficiency in sail and boat handling; his tacking was just the best and he sailed the J24 flattest in the fleet. It was the proverbial 'no stone unturned to win' philosophy and no need to bang corners.


Including IIRC a rule 69 suspension for illegal hull modification, which seems to have been air-brushed out of history. Admit I'm dredging the memory banks here. Anyone remember more?


You're thinking E22 keel root, something that had been done to hulls before he even got into the class. He certainly was not rule 69'd, and most certainly was not suspended in any way.

Kenny dominated that worlds by having good speed, sailing really smart, and having excellent crew work. Just like he did in the J24.

#376 winchfodder

winchfodder

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 617 posts
  • Location:Carolina, USA

Posted 26 February 2012 - 11:11 AM


I remember the days when Mr Read was sailing and winning in J24's. He was far ahead of most of the fleet putting more time on the water to maximise crew efficiency in sail and boat handling; his tacking was just the best and he sailed the J24 flattest in the fleet. It was the proverbial 'no stone unturned to win' philosophy and no need to bang corners.


Including IIRC a rule 69 suspension for illegal hull modification, which seems to have been air-brushed out of history. Admit I'm dredging the memory banks here. Anyone remember more?

More positively, I also sailed J24s in that period and remember watching a video of Ken Read's team sailing downwind in a breeze. The work rate on the boat was staggeringly ahead of anything I'd previously seen. Made you think.


I think he is not the only top pro who has sailed close to the wind in 'optimising' one design hulls and appendages over the years (I have sailed with them!) Often matching the hull/keel/rudder templates are just pushed too far. Problem I guess, apart from the desire to win, is that too many one-designs are not built to exacting standards, leaving room for the pros to get stuck in and optimise. And of course often the rules are not that precise on what you can and can't do. So don't blame Kenny on this one.

As for the 'not the around the world race', I have to admit that the tactical options presented in this leg are absolutely rivetting. I now just wish that one boat had headed south on the rhumb line and tried to pushed through the doldrums.

#377 dogwatch

dogwatch

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,749 posts
  • Location:South Coast, UK
  • Interests:Racing in all forms.

Posted 26 February 2012 - 11:23 AM

You're thinking E22 keel root, something that had been done to hulls before he even got into the class.


No I wasn't. I'm thinking of replacement of J24 deck with a lighter core, somewhere around the front hatch, following damage he said had been done by repeated dropping of the pole in the area. It was a long time ago and I'll freely admit my memory is hazy on the details. I'm not wishing to shit-stir, just curious really whether anybody can remember better than I can.

#378 hermetic

hermetic

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 687 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 12:15 PM


You're thinking E22 keel root, something that had been done to hulls before he even got into the class.


No I wasn't. I'm thinking of replacement of J24 deck with a lighter core, somewhere around the front hatch, following damage he said had been done by repeated dropping of the pole in the area. It was a long time ago and I'll freely admit my memory is hazy on the details. I'm not wishing to shit-stir, just curious really whether anybody can remember better than I can.


Yes, he rebuilt a hatch himself - heavier and stronger. The J's didn't like that it wasn't OEM and asked him to replace it.

Again, no R69 or suspension.

#379 Carboninit

Carboninit

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,200 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 12:30 PM

Telefonica again Noice.

#380 smackdaddy

smackdaddy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,752 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 04:28 PM

Wow. Latest sked shows Puma running at 18+ knots and starting to climb up the board. Seriously impressive.

#381 Carboninit

Carboninit

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,200 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 04:57 PM

Groupama should hit the trades first? Are the trades further east than normal?

#382 richie

richie

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 610 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 04:59 PM

Wow. Latest sked shows Puma running at 18+ knots and starting to climb up the board. Seriously impressive.


Sure does...nice !! This race is far from over...and it's open for everybody(anybody) to win it !!

#383 smackdaddy

smackdaddy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,752 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 05:05 PM


Wow. Latest sked shows Puma running at 18+ knots and starting to climb up the board. Seriously impressive.


Sure does...nice !! This race is far from over...and it's open for everybody(anybody) to win it !!


+1. And I hereby offer my apologies to Addis for doubting him and suggesting that he be eaten by his crewmates.

#384 Icedtea

Icedtea

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,175 posts
  • Location:Ireland

Posted 26 February 2012 - 05:30 PM

If they pull this off, IMHO there should be a new prize but up for the Volvo, the "Goldenballs" award, for whichever crew displays the most ballsy tactics.


Hard to see it getting more extreme than this!

#385 bombarie

bombarie

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 42 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 05:50 PM

Its not a Monster, Its a Giant Leaping Cat! Built the Puma crew a statue already, this is ace. I mean, you have to admit, this was a freakin' gutsy move. They should do better than Groupama in the next 12 hrs as they stay in the bigger winds. I'd say they'll keep trucking through 155 East at minimum, before turning the bow down, reaching down through the trades, showing up on the lower part of New Caledonia to pick up a Northerly all they way to Auckland. This is a done deal.

#386 mad

mad

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,023 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 05:57 PM

Its not a Monster, Its a Giant Leaping Cat! Built the Puma crew a statue already, this is ace. I mean, you have to admit, this was a freakin' gutsy move. They should do better than Groupama in the next 12 hrs as they stay in the bigger winds. I'd say they'll keep trucking through 155 East at minimum, before turning the bow down, reaching down through the trades, showing up on the lower part of New Caledonia to pick up a Northerly all they way to Auckland. This is a done deal.

With over 4000 miles to go, thats your prediction??

#387 richie

richie

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 610 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 06:01 PM


Its not a Monster, Its a Giant Leaping Cat! Built the Puma crew a statue already, this is ace. I mean, you have to admit, this was a freakin' gutsy move. They should do better than Groupama in the next 12 hrs as they stay in the bigger winds. I'd say they'll keep trucking through 155 East at minimum, before turning the bow down, reaching down through the trades, showing up on the lower part of New Caledonia to pick up a Northerly all they way to Auckland. This is a done deal.

With over 4000 miles to go, thats your prediction??

...well,I like it :P

#388 mad

mad

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,023 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 06:23 PM



Its not a Monster, Its a Giant Leaping Cat! Built the Puma crew a statue already, this is ace. I mean, you have to admit, this was a freakin' gutsy move. They should do better than Groupama in the next 12 hrs as they stay in the bigger winds. I'd say they'll keep trucking through 155 East at minimum, before turning the bow down, reaching down through the trades, showing up on the lower part of New Caledonia to pick up a Northerly all they way to Auckland. This is a done deal.

With over 4000 miles to go, thats your prediction??

...well,I like it :P

Just amazed none of the teams have hired this guru clown yet! :lol:

#389 bulbouskeel

bulbouskeel

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 102 posts
  • Location:eastern LIS
  • Interests:some

Posted 26 February 2012 - 06:25 PM

Its not a Monster, Its a Giant Leaping Cat! Built the Puma crew a statue already, this is ace. I mean, you have to admit, this was a freakin' gutsy move. They should do better than Groupama in the next 12 hrs as they stay in the bigger winds. I'd say they'll keep trucking through 155 East at minimum, before turning the bow down, reaching down through the trades, showing up on the lower part of New Caledonia to pick up a Northerly all they way to Auckland. This is a done deal.




Puma has, as the saying goes, thrown a cat amongst the pigeons.

But there's this thing called the Doldrums which has a way of fouling up even the best laid plans, still to come.

#390 bombarie

bombarie

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 42 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 06:56 PM




Its not a Monster, Its a Giant Leaping Cat! Built the Puma crew a statue already, this is ace. I mean, you have to admit, this was a freakin' gutsy move. They should do better than Groupama in the next 12 hrs as they stay in the bigger winds. I'd say they'll keep trucking through 155 East at minimum, before turning the bow down, reaching down through the trades, showing up on the lower part of New Caledonia to pick up a Northerly all they way to Auckland. This is a done deal.

With over 4000 miles to go, thats your prediction??

...well,I like it :P

Just amazed none of the teams have hired this guru clown yet! :lol:


You clearly don't understand. The role of the clown is to keep the masses in good spirits. You gotta keep believing.

Enjoy your race, and remember: Kenny and the boys win this one.

#391 Vorwaerts

Vorwaerts

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 285 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 08:52 PM





Its not a Monster, Its a Giant Leaping Cat! Built the Puma crew a statue already, this is ace. I mean, you have to admit, this was a freakin' gutsy move. They should do better than Groupama in the next 12 hrs as they stay in the bigger winds. I'd say they'll keep trucking through 155 East at minimum, before turning the bow down, reaching down through the trades, showing up on the lower part of New Caledonia to pick up a Northerly all they way to Auckland. This is a done deal.

With over 4000 miles to go, thats your prediction??

...well,I like it :P

Just amazed none of the teams have hired this guru clown yet! :lol:


You clearly don't understand. The role of the clown is to keep the masses in good spirits. You gotta keep believing.

Enjoy your race, and remember: Kenny and the boys win this one.


I would bet my money on Groupama right now. And thy are carrying fresh eggs to bake birthday cake to a crew member. Hopefully a happy Crew is a fast Crew.

#392 oioi

oioi

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 578 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 09:11 PM

I am amazed by how close the boats have ben so far on this leg. Even sanya hanging in there. On the basis that the current race is first to the east, it looks to me like 3 groups, with puma and groupama in first, camper and ador in mid and tele and sanya at the back. Im really enjoying the race, but cant help feeling that a fleet of 10 boats would really have shaken it up a bit.

#393 Alysum

Alysum

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 280 posts
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:40 PM

What are the trade winds direction in that area? Is it all that wind coming from East? Finally they can turn south and reach towards NZ?

GO Groupama!

#394 Expedition

Expedition

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 191 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:52 PM

Another GFS based update, no currents or winds and all with the same polar.


Name Time Delta
GPMA 11d 22h 58m -2h 38m
PUMA 11d 23h 13m -2h 23m
ADOR 12d 00h 28m -1h 07m
CAMP 12d 01h 36m
SNYA 12d 05h 55m 4h 19m
TELE 12d 06h 14m 4h 38m

Attached Files

  • Attached File  t.jpg   361.43K   132 downloads


#395 Jono

Jono

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 657 posts

Posted 26 February 2012 - 11:37 PM

Thanks Nick
So to summarise. Looks good out East but anyones's game at present.

#396 rule69

rule69

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,671 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 12:06 AM

Thanks Expedition. Not that it matters I suppose but you have the fleet aground on Ile de Pins. Local conditions coming through the island (and navigation for that matter) should be interesting.

Edit: actually looks like you have them going in Havana and out the Southern Lagoon which would be truly interesting.

#397 the paradox of thrift

the paradox of thrift

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,376 posts
  • Location:Mos-Vegas
  • Interests:I like sailing

Posted 27 February 2012 - 01:23 AM

I reckon they would be tired boys after the past week.

Puma and Groupama look best, but a week in there's everything to play for.

Things could have turned out a lt worse for Telefonica and Camper. They'll be very relieved if they can stay in touch.

Camper will deperately want to keep Telefonica behind them - even if Groupama get in ahead.

Auckland will be buzzing when the fleet get there.

#398 Somtam Cowboy

Somtam Cowboy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 592 posts
  • Location:Phuket .Thailand

Posted 27 February 2012 - 02:32 AM

Jeez...May have to find a hat to eat.... :unsure:
Well done Kenny and Co.
Feel for Cramper, as they've sailed pretty well positioning wise overall.
Certainly a whole differant kettle of fish sailing the Pacific.
Compared to all those years just blasting around the bottom.
They'll be glad to get to Kiwi Land after this leg.

#399 Heriberto

Heriberto

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,061 posts
  • Location:Saint Paul, Minnesota
  • Interests:Mount Gay Sugarcane

Posted 27 February 2012 - 02:56 AM

You're wrong about the number of masts and booms allowed. I don't recall the exact details, but a participant can ask permission to build additional masts and booms, which must be built from the same tooling as the originals and must be measured prior to use. The intent is clearly to allow teams to build two masts when building and tuning the boat but to allow for construction of additional spares when things break.

You're also wrong about reconstructing the busted rigs. It's sometimes possible, sometimes not. Regaining ultimate strength is rarely the issue - the problem is in keeping the weight down and maintaining the vertical-center-of-mass so that the repaired spar will measure in.


Thanks. I pretty clearly had said something to the effect of "to its optimum performance" but that was ignored.

Apparently people are interested in the leg so the sky isn't falling just yet.

#400 jc172528

jc172528

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,004 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:47 AM


Its not a Monster, Its a Giant Leaping Cat! Built the Puma crew a statue already, this is ace. I mean, you have to admit, this was a freakin' gutsy move. They should do better than Groupama in the next 12 hrs as they stay in the bigger winds. I'd say they'll keep trucking through 155 East at minimum, before turning the bow down, reaching down through the trades, showing up on the lower part of New Caledonia to pick up a Northerly all they way to Auckland. This is a done deal.

With over 4000 miles to go, thats your prediction??


As per Leg 3
-1- Tele (by a nose)
-2- Camper
-3- Group

Puma are just not fast enough, plain and simple







0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users