Carbon Porn Sunday
#101
Posted 24 April 2012 - 07:12 PM
#102
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:48 AM

#103
Posted 26 April 2012 - 12:52 PM
#104
Posted 26 April 2012 - 02:29 PM
Interesting main reef distribution. 1st looks sorta nominal (aligns head to I-point I guess), then 2nd is many times larger. Is the 2nd reef dictated by some other consideration, like location of upper spreaders or an inner forestay or running back attachment?
Looking at the sail designation code on the tack of the main it reads OMN-A. Guessing that means it's their offshore main.
#105
Posted 26 April 2012 - 02:38 PM
It looks like the first reef goes to the houses, and the second goes to the top set of spreaders; probably something to do with the strength needed to support the loads of the square top main.
#106
Posted 26 April 2012 - 02:42 PM
On rough guess-trapolation, I get the checks to be at the second spreaders, and the 2nd reef lands the mainsail head at the 3rd spreaders. Looks also as though the square head might clear inside the topmast backstays when reefed to the second reef (but obviously not the checks).Interesting main reef distribution. 1st looks sorta nominal (aligns head to I-point I guess), then 2nd is many times larger. Is the 2nd reef dictated by some other consideration, like location of upper spreaders or an inner forestay or running back attachment?
#107
Posted 26 April 2012 - 02:53 PM
#108
Posted 26 April 2012 - 05:09 PM
first race? when
Looks like she is signed up to do the Around Block Island Race on May 25th.
#109
Posted 26 April 2012 - 08:26 PM
#111
Posted 27 April 2012 - 03:50 AM
#112
Posted 27 April 2012 - 06:57 AM
It's not unheard of. You can make booms really light if there's no reef points etc.....
Latest post
Mentions offshore boom, is Team Bella Mente going to swap out booms for inshore and offshore races?
Really lighter? How much lighter are you going to make a carbon boom? Take out two spinlock jammers and reef lines and the boom is what 6-8 Ibs lighter?
Serious question, what is the difference between an offshore boom and an inshore boom? Maybe layers of carbon? I know from experience, carbon vs. water, water always wins. Maybe a thicker boom gives carbon a fighting chance against water.
I know Scarlet Runner has two booms, you can pick up the inshore one easily with one hand. I think the offshore boom is substantially heavier, remember the offshore one has to be able to withstand 50kt winds, they aren't going to race an inshore race in those winds. So that's a lot of extra carbon plus reef lines, sheaves, and clutches... It's enough weight for it to make a difference.
and it doesn't bump the rating? inside the ???kg varience that prompts a re-rate ??????
#113
Posted 27 April 2012 - 07:35 AM
It's not unheard of. You can make booms really light if there's no reef points etc.....
Latest post
Mentions offshore boom, is Team Bella Mente going to swap out booms for inshore and offshore races?
Really lighter? How much lighter are you going to make a carbon boom? Take out two spinlock jammers and reef lines and the boom is what 6-8 Ibs lighter?
Serious question, what is the difference between an offshore boom and an inshore boom? Maybe layers of carbon? I know from experience, carbon vs. water, water always wins. Maybe a thicker boom gives carbon a fighting chance against water.
I know Scarlet Runner has two booms, you can pick up the inshore one easily with one hand. I think the offshore boom is substantially heavier, remember the offshore one has to be able to withstand 50kt winds, they aren't going to race an inshore race in those winds. So that's a lot of extra carbon plus reef lines, sheaves, and clutches... It's enough weight for it to make a difference.
and it doesn't bump the rating? inside the ???kg varience that prompts a re-rate ??????
Can't say I know what the deal with the rating is. All i know is they have it.
#114
Posted 27 April 2012 - 07:42 AM
#115
Posted 27 April 2012 - 01:41 PM
Previous boat rated at 1.540.
#116
Posted 28 April 2012 - 08:25 PM
It's not unheard of. You can make booms really light if there's no reef points etc.....
Latest post
Mentions offshore boom, is Team Bella Mente going to swap out booms for inshore and offshore races?
Really lighter? How much lighter are you going to make a carbon boom? Take out two spinlock jammers and reef lines and the boom is what 6-8 Ibs lighter?
Serious question, what is the difference between an offshore boom and an inshore boom? Maybe layers of carbon? I know from experience, carbon vs. water, water always wins. Maybe a thicker boom gives carbon a fighting chance against water.
I know Scarlet Runner has two booms, you can pick up the inshore one easily with one hand. I think the offshore boom is substantially heavier, remember the offshore one has to be able to withstand 50kt winds, they aren't going to race an inshore race in those winds. So that's a lot of extra carbon plus reef lines, sheaves, and clutches... It's enough weight for it to make a difference.
and it doesn't bump the rating? inside the ???kg varience that prompts a re-rate ??????
Sure, it might. But these programs have different certs for offshore and inshore anyway - in fact, they might have different certs for (almost) every event to reflect the customizations and modifications (sail plan, keel/bulb, other appendages, etc.).
#117
Posted 30 April 2012 - 07:33 AM
Sure, it might. But these programs have different certs for offshore and inshore anyway - in fact, they might have different certs for (almost) every event to reflect the customizations and modifications (sail plan, keel/bulb, other appendages, etc.).
Ehm, Under IRC (primary rating rule for Mini-Maxis) you are only allowed 7 certificate changes a year and you can only have a single valid certificate at any one time. I know, that is probably not far off the number of events they will participate in but experience and settings will not be transferable with big changes and that counts for much more than a point or two here and there. Plus these guys are more likely to have reef locks than the spinlock jammers, like on the Volvos.
The difference in boom weight inshore/offshore is not much more than the food and drink that gets packed for a single day racing with 20 or so crew.
The real interesting thing based on the photos is that it looks the guys have gone for inline spreaders compared to al the swept-back rigs we have seen in the mini-maxi fleet so far. That should reduce the compression in the tube so BM probably has the lightest tube of the mini-maxis and can get away with lighter rigging as well. It will result in a rating penalty (IRC) though and obviously you need some pretty switched on guys on the backstay, runners and checks.
#118
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:43 AM
Off shore the boom weight can be managed by freeze dried over fresh or a watermaker going in.
#119
Posted 09 May 2012 - 08:33 PM
#120
Posted 11 May 2012 - 12:22 AM
Would that only be for offshore?
#121
Posted 11 May 2012 - 12:48 AM
This is interesting
Would that only be for offshore?
The boat will be doing mostly offshore this year, and you'd never use an A3 around the bouys. I'd guess the furler going to the bikes is as fast as a takedown line, and much more controllable for the reaching kites
#122
Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:38 AM
This is interesting
Would that only be for offshore?
The boat will be doing mostly offshore this year, and you'd never use an A3 around the bouys. I'd guess the furler going to the bikes is as fast as a takedown line, and much more controllable for the reaching kites
Fair point.
#123
Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:39 AM
#124
Posted 11 May 2012 - 03:07 AM
Laminate A3's are a mofo to handle... especially on that scale so sometimes furlers are a much better option... that one looked like a top down? I know a few boats in the Southport race last year had their A3's on a furler at the end of the sprit and the A0 on a furler either at the bow or halfway along the sprit... leaving them both hoisted and ready for action allows for very quick changes without having to send anyone forward when conditions were heinous.... makes a lot of sense.
Yes, it is a top down. Definitely a good idea.
#125
Posted 11 May 2012 - 12:13 PM
This is interesting
Would that only be for offshore?
The boat will be doing mostly offshore this year, and you'd never use an A3 around the bouys. I'd guess the furler going to the bikes is as fast as a takedown line, and much more controllable for the reaching kites
Fingers, arms, legs, and eyes all crossed during this manuver.
Gets ugly at night.
#126
Posted 15 May 2012 - 04:26 PM
Cheers,
Jim
#127
Posted 16 May 2012 - 03:18 AM
Anyone know where the video of the A3 being furled went?
Cheers,
Jim
was wondering the same thing
#128
Posted 16 May 2012 - 09:08 AM
#129
Posted 28 June 2012 - 06:38 AM
What's the latest on sister ship Stig?
It's Heeeeerrrrrreeeeeeeeeeee! (or there, depending if you're in Valencia!)
#130
Posted 20 July 2012 - 03:33 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












