Laser with an I14 rig
#1
Posted 15 March 2012 - 09:20 PM
#2
Posted 15 March 2012 - 09:23 PM
#3
Posted 15 March 2012 - 09:28 PM
#4
Posted 15 March 2012 - 09:35 PM
#5
Posted 15 March 2012 - 09:52 PM
#6
Posted 15 March 2012 - 09:55 PM
#7
Posted 15 March 2012 - 09:57 PM
On the general idea: Having half (just for a number) the righting moment one "should" have for the rig will be interesting to see how it works. We had posts about lake racing somewhere off in Eastern Europe (Hungary I think) where they were racing Melges 24 singlehanded and so forth. They did okay though it sounds way off.
Of course, that's a light-air strategy, not something for suitable-all-around.
Let us know how this goes!!
#8
Posted 15 March 2012 - 10:04 PM
#9
Posted 15 March 2012 - 10:16 PM
#10
Posted 15 March 2012 - 10:21 PM
#11
Posted 15 March 2012 - 10:28 PM
#12
Posted 15 March 2012 - 10:35 PM
Sorry Dude, but the 'Contender' has been around for decades.
Not with a massive spinnaker
That is a One Design 14 GP rig. Can see the old hardware. Main logo would also suggest this. Very cool. Who's boat?
It's Luke/Eric Lawrence's
#13
Posted 15 March 2012 - 10:39 PM
#14
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:05 PM
-it's a big rig of a 1995 US 14
#15
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:19 PM
#16
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:45 PM
Nice job guys, definitely want to see this progress.
#17
Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:23 AM
Hell, it can't eve hold up to the load of the normal rig.
Granted they may have made some improvements in construction since my day, but I was able to twist the boat on its longitudinal axis just by hiking my 190-pound ass with the stock rig. The mast step/tube/whatever is not exactly enshrined in the engineering hall of fame...
#18
Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:33 AM
#19
Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:38 AM
#20
Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:40 AM
that IS a Franken rig, but your camerawork is great!
Thanks, I was kicking myself for how shaky it was in some spots, I'm going to make a stabilized mini-boom eventually for stuff like this.
#21
Posted 16 March 2012 - 02:33 AM
that IS a Franken rig, but your camerawork is great!
I like the underwater shots. That can't be easy with more than just a knot or two of speed.
#22
Posted 16 March 2012 - 02:56 AM
#23
Posted 16 March 2012 - 04:19 AM
#24
Posted 16 March 2012 - 09:54 AM
#25
Posted 16 March 2012 - 10:02 AM
A Brit did something similar a few years ago, with a more modest sail plan. In fact it's what led to the development of the RS100:


Full Account here, but 10MB PDF...
http://rs100sailing....development.pdf
#26
Posted 16 March 2012 - 10:53 AM
Anybody know the song thats playing?
It's in the video description - Finally Moving by Pretty Lights
#27
Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:37 AM
#28
Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:43 PM
#29
Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:52 PM
i too had the idea
i guess everybody who is used to trapez-boats thought about it (in one way or another), while hicking there hairy asses out of the ultimate 4ksb.
the most striking thing too me:
people actually do have too much time.
moneywise? i wouldn't spend a pound, but if the stuff is lying around? why not...
but the time!!!!
in my young days i converted a contender with a assym. i used an opti boom with its fork around the mast and one set of stays from midway to the bow. i used an old symm kite (can't remeber which boat is was from ) and it was ok. never had it up in shit loads of wind but still it was cool.
no, i don't have any pictures (imagin that), but i've seen some other pics with kited contenders.
anyway, keep up the frankenstein thing. in all classes.
please do
#30
Posted 16 March 2012 - 01:15 PM
#31
Posted 16 March 2012 - 01:20 PM
#32
Posted 16 March 2012 - 01:21 PM
#33
Posted 16 March 2012 - 04:27 PM
I think the hansen main would slow it down...
Why would that be?
#34
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:57 PM
#35
Posted 16 March 2012 - 06:59 PM
#36
Posted 16 March 2012 - 08:17 PM
#37
Posted 16 March 2012 - 08:51 PM
If it were a current I14 mainsail I'd suppose about 12.5 m2 as a rough guess, but apparently it's a One Design GP.
The reason is, it could help show how far sailing-area-for-righing-moment can be pushed for a light-air play boat. Thanks!
#38
Posted 16 March 2012 - 08:52 PM
*Shameless bump to get this out from under all the occupy BS
+1
#39
Posted 16 March 2012 - 09:07 PM
Do you know about what the sail area is, and the crew weights?
If it were a current I14 mainsail I'd suppose about 12.5 m2 as a rough guess, but apparently it's a One Design GP.
The reason is, it could help show how far sailing-area-for-righing-moment can be pushed for a light-air play boat. Thanks!
Crew weight is probably about 175, not sure about sail area.
#40
Posted 16 March 2012 - 09:07 PM
#41
Posted 16 March 2012 - 09:16 PM
#42
Posted 16 March 2012 - 09:30 PM
How 'bout a set of wings from a Hobie FX1?
That or racks to get the crew out further would be overkill on top of overkill, but sick nonetheless.
#43
Posted 16 March 2012 - 09:35 PM
#44
Posted 16 March 2012 - 09:42 PM
#45
Posted 17 March 2012 - 12:10 AM
Can you right it?
#46
Posted 17 March 2012 - 12:17 AM
Great project. Major boo-yaa's to ya's.
Can you right it?
Yeah, he flipped once during that session and it didn't seem to be much of a problem.
#47
Posted 17 March 2012 - 12:18 AM
laser 2?
Yup. Seems pretty obvious really.
#48
Posted 17 March 2012 - 12:33 AM
And for fuck's sake,
WHAT'S IT RATE?
#49
Posted 17 March 2012 - 02:11 AM
?????? What an idiot?
#50
Posted 17 March 2012 - 02:13 AM
Isn't it a contender with a kite?
![]()
?????? What an idiot?
Why idiot?
#51
Posted 17 March 2012 - 03:54 AM
#52
Posted 17 March 2012 - 12:07 PM
Isn't it a contender with a kite?
![]()
?????? What an idiot?
No, a Contender main is a lot smaller
#53
Posted 17 March 2012 - 04:30 PM
#54
Posted 17 March 2012 - 08:23 PM
#55
Posted 17 March 2012 - 09:24 PM
Sorry Dude, but the 'Contender' has been around for decades.
Not with a massive spinnaker![]()
That is a One Design 14 GP rig. Can see the old hardware. Main logo would also suggest this. Very cool. Who's boat?
It's Luke/Eric Lawrence's
yeah, i've gota say for the first part the video i was also thinking ho hum...contender. but then saw the kite...hmmmmm...getting that up and down must be entertaining !
well done
cheers,
#56
Posted 17 March 2012 - 09:33 PM
#57
Posted 18 March 2012 - 03:52 AM
#58
Posted 18 March 2012 - 06:17 PM
Anybody know the song thats playing?
Pretty sure its "Finally Moving" by "Pretty Lights"
#59
Posted 18 March 2012 - 10:16 PM
The Leader class was designed and built by Paul Kulmar in Sydney Australia, in the early 1980's.
It's 13' long, fine skiff nose on hull similar to Laser on the bottom, but with open, free draining deck on top.
The foam-core hulls are similar in design and construction to the Aero9 style NS14/MG14; just shorter and narrower.
It has 2 mast steps and 2 sets of rear stay hounds, so you can move the mast forward and sail 1-up cat rigged, or move aft for 2-up sloop rigged.
It has Yachting Vic yardstick of 117, slower than a Laser Radial (116).
With trapeze + asymmetric, this may drop to 108; similar to a Contender (107.5)
I only weigh 62kg, so am looking at a 10sq.m spinnaker. Expect to sail it 1-up mostly, but love the option of moving the mast, adding jib and going 2-up.
Am not worried about class rules; the Leader class is pretty much extinct these days anyway.
I'm seeing this as a cost effective way of getting a trap+kite style sports skiff. Expecting total cost around AUS$2000, compared to $6000 for 2nd hand MG with bowsprit (which would be too powerful for me to sail 1-up anyway), or $7500+ for 2nd hand RS100, or more for other things like RS Vareo, Musto Skiff.
A comment above about the hull breaking with the nose lifting up. The Leader has a big vertical support, between the hull bottom and deck under the 2 mast steps. I imagine that this offers longitudanal strength, but also limits placement and length of retracting bowsprit.
Questions:
- the frankenlaser has fixed bowsprit on the deck. Any problems with doing it that way?
- did you have to increase the rudder blade size?
- fun winter construction project, awesome next season toy, or what?
#60
Posted 19 March 2012 - 03:29 PM
#61
Posted 19 March 2012 - 08:13 PM
Awesomeness! Where does the chute go when it's down; is there a retrieval line or do you just haul on the sheet? I want to see a douse in breeze video :-)
haa me to, you just grab the sheet and stuff like crazzy, works pretty well if your not in a puff.
It was just a matter of time. Wonder what took so long?
thats what i said, so i did it
#62
Posted 19 March 2012 - 08:15 PM
Very cool!, now it needs a Hansen main!
Agreed, i think any up to date main will make worlds of difference.
#63
Posted 19 March 2012 - 08:22 PM
Very interested to see this. Am currently looking at adding bowsprit, asymmetrical kite and trapeze to a "Leader" dinghy.
The Leader class was designed and built by Paul Kulmar in Sydney Australia, in the early 1980's.
It's 13' long, fine skiff nose on hull similar to Laser on the bottom, but with open, free draining deck on top.
The foam-core hulls are similar in design and construction to the Aero9 style NS14/MG14; just shorter and narrower.
It has 2 mast steps and 2 sets of rear stay hounds, so you can move the mast forward and sail 1-up cat rigged, or move aft for 2-up sloop rigged.
It has Yachting Vic yardstick of 117, slower than a Laser Radial (116).
With trapeze + asymmetric, this may drop to 108; similar to a Contender (107.5)
I only weigh 62kg, so am looking at a 10sq.m spinnaker. Expect to sail it 1-up mostly, but love the option of moving the mast, adding jib and going 2-up.
Am not worried about class rules; the Leader class is pretty much extinct these days anyway.
I'm seeing this as a cost effective way of getting a trap+kite style sports skiff. Expecting total cost around AUS$2000, compared to $6000 for 2nd hand MG with bowsprit (which would be too powerful for me to sail 1-up anyway), or $7500+ for 2nd hand RS100, or more for other things like RS Vareo, Musto Skiff.
A comment above about the hull breaking with the nose lifting up. The Leader has a big vertical support, between the hull bottom and deck under the 2 mast steps. I imagine that this offers longitudanal strength, but also limits placement and length of retracting bowsprit.
Questions:
- the frankenlaser has fixed bowsprit on the deck. Any problems with doing it that way?
- did you have to increase the rudder blade size?
- fun winter construction project, awesome next season toy, or what?
sounds versatile
the fixed bowsprit inst a problem as long as you remember its there when racing other boats.....
the rudder is stock and refuses to bear away unless your on the wire but I sail out of Coral Reef Yacht club in Miami as much as i can, getting ready for the Miami to key largo race in mid April.
#64
Posted 19 March 2012 - 08:47 PM
Do you know about what the sail area is, and the crew weights?
If it were a current I14 mainsail I'd suppose about 12.5 m2 as a rough guess, but apparently it's a One Design GP.
The reason is, it could help show how far sailing-area-for-righing-moment can be pushed for a light-air play boat. Thanks!
all the rigging is from a 1995 14 GP boat, not quite sure what the numbers are.
#65
Posted 20 March 2012 - 02:01 AM
#66
Posted 20 March 2012 - 04:42 AM
ask RohanOz for some pics on an Aero 6 to MG conversion.Very interested to see this. Am currently looking at adding bowsprit, asymmetrical kite and trapeze to a "Leader" dinghy.
The Leader class was designed and built by Paul Kulmar in Sydney Australia, in the early 1980's.
It's 13' long, fine skiff nose on hull similar to Laser on the bottom, but with open, free draining deck on top.
The foam-core hulls are similar in design and construction to the Aero9 style NS14/MG14; just shorter and narrower.
It has 2 mast steps and 2 sets of rear stay hounds, so you can move the mast forward and sail 1-up cat rigged, or move aft for 2-up sloop rigged.
It has Yachting Vic yardstick of 117, slower than a Laser Radial (116).
With trapeze + asymmetric, this may drop to 108; similar to a Contender (107.5)
I only weigh 62kg, so am looking at a 10sq.m spinnaker. Expect to sail it 1-up mostly, but love the option of moving the mast, adding jib and going 2-up.
Am not worried about class rules; the Leader class is pretty much extinct these days anyway.
I'm seeing this as a cost effective way of getting a trap+kite style sports skiff. Expecting total cost around AUS$2000, compared to $6000 for 2nd hand MG with bowsprit (which would be too powerful for me to sail 1-up anyway), or $7500+ for 2nd hand RS100, or more for other things like RS Vareo, Musto Skiff.
A comment above about the hull breaking with the nose lifting up. The Leader has a big vertical support, between the hull bottom and deck under the 2 mast steps. I imagine that this offers longitudanal strength, but also limits placement and length of retracting bowsprit.
Had similar idea with a Leader, but got back to Northies and will do NS/MG.
Questions:
- the frankenlaser has fixed bowsprit on the deck. Any problems with doing it that way?
- did you have to increase the rudder blade size?
- fun winter construction project, awesome next season toy, or what?
I wouldn't compare the Leader with a 9, perhaps a 4, although Paul could have been 15 years ahead of Michael Nash.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












