Jump to content


Tsunami "Ghost Ship" Spotted Near BC


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#1 Earl Boebert

Earl Boebert

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 261 posts

Posted 03 April 2012 - 02:36 PM

http://m.inhabitat.c...unami-wreckage/

Cheers,

Earl

#2 Hobie Dog

Hobie Dog

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,824 posts
  • Location:Chesapeake Bay

Posted 03 April 2012 - 06:07 PM

One would think that with no power to run bilge pumps a ship like this would take on water and sink in a year's time. Kinda amazing she drifted that far!

#3 Earl Boebert

Earl Boebert

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 261 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 04:39 PM

Coasties are going to use it for live fire practice:

http://www.bbc.co.uk...canada-17630153

Cheers,

Earl

#4 K38BOB

K38BOB

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,535 posts
  • Location:Bay Area

Posted 05 April 2012 - 05:16 PM

Coasties are going to use it for live fire practice:

http://www.bbc.co.uk...canada-17630153

Cheers,

Earl


Island class patrol boats?

#5 SecondWindNC

SecondWindNC

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 87 posts
  • Location:Washington, NC

Posted 05 April 2012 - 05:40 PM

I must say I don't love that they're going to scuttle it with 2,000 gallons of diesel aboard, with the reasoning that it's "far enough from the nearest coastline that any spillage would dissipate naturally" - basically that just amounts to 'out of sight, out of mind'. Just because that diesel isn't going to reach the coast where we can see it doesn't mean it's not going to have a negative impact.


I understand the difficulty and danger of trying to do otherwise, but still ...

#6 couchsurfer

couchsurfer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,445 posts
  • Location:NA westcoast
  • Interests:...pimping HOOTs
    ...i550 NW circuit

Posted 05 April 2012 - 06:01 PM

I must say I don't love that they're going to scuttle it with 2,000 gallons of diesel aboard, with the reasoning that it's "far enough from the nearest coastline that any spillage would dissipate naturally" - basically that just amounts to 'out of sight, out of mind'. Just because that diesel isn't going to reach the coast where we can see it doesn't mean it's not going to have a negative impact.


I understand the difficulty and danger of trying to do otherwise, but still ...


..at least it's still outside the environment :)

#7 F-18 5150

F-18 5150

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,685 posts
  • Interests:sailing

Posted 05 April 2012 - 06:11 PM

That's what $10.000 of diesel?

#8 Hobie Dog

Hobie Dog

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,824 posts
  • Location:Chesapeake Bay

Posted 05 April 2012 - 06:14 PM

OK guys I am curious. Why would it not be cost effective to salvage the ship? It's not like this is a 35 Sea Ray that you can replace for 50K.

Are the engine rooms flooded? Why not put a few Dudes on board and fire up the engines? It's not like the ship has been sitting unused for 10 or 20 years. She is still floating and only been adrift for a little over a year so most of the systems should still work??? Yes/No???

#9 couchsurfer

couchsurfer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,445 posts
  • Location:NA westcoast
  • Interests:...pimping HOOTs
    ...i550 NW circuit

Posted 05 April 2012 - 06:21 PM

OK guys I am curious. Why would it not be cost effective to salvage the ship? It's not like this is a 35 Sea Ray that you can replace for 50K.

Are the engine rooms flooded? Why not put a few Dudes on board and fire up the engines? It's not like the ship has been sitting unused for 10 or 20 years. She is still floating and only been adrift for a little over a year so most of the systems should still work??? Yes/No???

...if the boat was salvaged,,the USCG wouldn't have anythin to scuttle :( ;)

#10 K38BOB

K38BOB

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,535 posts
  • Location:Bay Area

Posted 05 April 2012 - 07:05 PM


OK guys I am curious. Why would it not be cost effective to salvage the ship? It's not like this is a 35 Sea Ray that you can replace for 50K.

Are the engine rooms flooded? Why not put a few Dudes on board and fire up the engines? It's not like the ship has been sitting unused for 10 or 20 years. She is still floating and only been adrift for a little over a year so most of the systems should still work??? Yes/No???

...if the boat was salvaged,,the USCG wouldn't have anythin to scuttle :( ;)


Maybe its a viral marketing plan to get someone to salvage it.. Posted Image

#11 SemiSalt

SemiSalt

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,553 posts
  • Location:WLIS

Posted 05 April 2012 - 07:32 PM

OK guys I am curious. Why would it not be cost effective to salvage the ship? It's not like this is a 35 Sea Ray that you can replace for 50K.


Start out with the fuel. Would you put that fuel in your tank? What's the clean-up cost for that alone?

#12 I'moutahere

I'moutahere

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,810 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 07:37 PM


OK guys I am curious. Why would it not be cost effective to salvage the ship? It's not like this is a 35 Sea Ray that you can replace for 50K.


Start out with the fuel. Would you put that fuel in your tank? What's the clean-up cost for that alone?


Better to recycle it than dump it in the ocean.

#13 President Eisenhowler

President Eisenhowler

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,477 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 07:58 PM


OK guys I am curious. Why would it not be cost effective to salvage the ship? It's not like this is a 35 Sea Ray that you can replace for 50K.


Start out with the fuel. Would you put that fuel in your tank? What's the clean-up cost for that alone?


I wouldn't put it in the tank of a diesel engine, but I'd have no problem burning it for heat; no high precision parts involved there.

#14 LakeBoy

LakeBoy

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,128 posts
  • Location:Too far from Anywhere

Posted 05 April 2012 - 08:32 PM

THIS JUST IN:

Canadian Fishermen claim rights to Japanese Ship


and I thought I had heard a few days ago that it was meandering up the coast to look for work in Alaska...

#15 Windward

Windward

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,268 posts
  • Interests:Building and managing websites using the Umbraco CMS

Posted 05 April 2012 - 08:37 PM

It was already slated for scrapping, so its unlikely that there is much of anything valuable left.

Thats a big liability to take by the fishermen if they tow it in.

Its a long way to India to scrap it.

#16 Innocent Bystander

Innocent Bystander

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,643 posts
  • Location:Lower Southern MD

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:57 PM

Sounds like the would be salvor gave up.

#17 Swanno (Ohf Shore)

Swanno (Ohf Shore)

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,782 posts
  • Location:Perth, Western Australia

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:52 PM

The ship had been destined for scrapping when the Japan earthquake struck


The ship has no lights or communications system and has a tank that could carry more than 2,000 gallons of diesel fuel.



I don't get why it would/could have so much fuel if it was to be scrapped.

I wonder if they are justifying shooting it.

#18 couchsurfer

couchsurfer

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,445 posts
  • Location:NA westcoast
  • Interests:...pimping HOOTs
    ...i550 NW circuit

Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:32 PM

...just heard on the news,,,the deed's been done :huh:

...nothin t'see here folks,,,move along ;)

#19 DA-WOODY

DA-WOODY

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,139 posts
  • Location:I'm in Sunny..-. Warm..& ..Dry San Diego . and your not :-)
  • Interests:Prime + 1 3/4

    COUGARS COUGARS & More COUGARS

Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:51 AM


US Coast Guard unleashes cannon fire at Japanese ghost ship set adrift by last year’s tsunami







http://www.washingto...HRyS_story.html









#20 Hobie Dog

Hobie Dog

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,824 posts
  • Location:Chesapeake Bay

Posted 06 April 2012 - 03:10 PM

OK the ship was already scheduled to be scrapped, makes more sense now. As has been said there probably was not a lot of fuel on board. Any video of the pumbling?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users