Il Mostro on the Hudson?
#1
Posted 07 May 2012 - 12:57 AM
#2
Posted 07 May 2012 - 01:02 AM
Maybe they are taking the boat through the Erie canal for the freshwater season?
Joe
#3
Posted 07 May 2012 - 01:10 AM
Definitely Il Mostro.
Maybe they are taking the boat through the Erie canal for the freshwater season?
Joe
That is correct she is in the Erie canal right now heading towards the lakes
#4
Posted 07 May 2012 - 02:29 AM
#5
Posted 07 May 2012 - 02:34 AM
I'll go first: "New design suggestions by Juan K for enhanced light air performance"
#6
Posted 07 May 2012 - 07:24 AM
#7
Posted 07 May 2012 - 08:53 AM
Is it possible that the keel is on a truck? Can you motor a boat like that around without it?
I reckon the outboard is for maneuvering- a stern-thruster type of arrangement.
SERGE
#8
Posted 07 May 2012 - 10:25 AM
On second look... what the fuck is that outboard doing on the transom?! I think we need a caption contest...
I'll go first: "New design suggestions by Juan K for enhanced light air performance"
If the outboard is there as a backup, it's a very bad advertisement for Volvo engines...
#9
Posted 07 May 2012 - 12:56 PM
Board raisers.And what's the structure build of 2" x 4" between the daggerboards? Have they pulled the pin and lifted the keel? Doesn't really look beefy enough for that application ... hmmmm
#10
Posted 07 May 2012 - 05:12 PM
Joe
#11
Posted 07 May 2012 - 05:36 PM
#12
Posted 07 May 2012 - 06:14 PM
She might have AIS running.Would she be heading all the way up the canal through Rochester? I've GOT to see that thing when she comes through!!! Too bad there's not a tracker on it so I know when it's close.
#13
Posted 08 May 2012 - 01:46 AM
#14
Posted 08 May 2012 - 11:59 AM
#15
Posted 08 May 2012 - 12:38 PM
Much the same I'd have thought; without a rig, you're going to be canting the hull rather than the keel...Wonder how much she draws with the keel canted?
#16
Posted 08 May 2012 - 12:45 PM
Much the same I'd have thought; without a rig, you're going to be canting the hull rather than the keel...
Wonder how much she draws with the keel canted?
Keel was removed the daggerboards are therebto help with stability and to try and stop her going sideways .
#17
Posted 08 May 2012 - 08:38 PM
Much the same I'd have thought; without a rig, you're going to be canting the hull rather than the keel...
Wonder how much she draws with the keel canted?
Keel was removed the daggerboards are therebto help with stability and to try and stop her going sideways .
If you can afford a boat like that I would think you could afford to truck her from RI to IL or MI; wherever she is going.
#18
Posted 08 May 2012 - 09:49 PM
1336509492[/url]' post='3704354']
1336481157[/url]' post='3703541']
1336480681[/url]' post='3703531']
Much the same I'd have thought; without a rig, you're going to be canting the hull rather than the keel...1336478364[/url]' post='3703500']
Wonder how much she draws with the keel canted?
Keel was removed the daggerboards are therebto help with stability and to try and stop her going sideways .
If you can afford a boat like that I would think you could afford to truck her from RI to IL or MI; wherever she is going.
#19
Posted 08 May 2012 - 10:04 PM
Why would you? Boats fall off trucks, light poles get taken out, insurance may or may not be available, you need wide / long load permits and escorts, and probably a bunch of other stuff. Plus your already paid for crew has to do stuff they don't know much about. This way, you have smart boat people doing smart boat people things.If you can afford a boat like that I would think you could afford to truck her from RI to IL or MI; wherever she is going.
Keel was removed the daggerboards are therebto help with stability and to try and stop her going sideways .
Sounds like a fun delivery.
Koukel
#20
Posted 09 May 2012 - 01:08 AM
#21
Posted 09 May 2012 - 01:58 AM
Cheaper and probably logistically easier to get it to Torreson's this way. With all the other crap believe it or not it will end up taking about the same about of time! Just ask Brian. There's no real rush for Thornton to get the thing the Chicago anyhow. I would assume they are going to do both Macs?
Boat is going to Eldeans .
#22
Posted 09 May 2012 - 02:03 AM
Cheaper and probably logistically easier to get it to Torreson's this way. With all the other crap believe it or not it will end up taking about the same about of time! Just ask Brian. There's no real rush for Thornton to get the thing the Chicago anyhow. I would assume they are going to do both Macs?
Boat is going to Eldeans .
No water issue with Eldeans? Even so its still easier for Pete to have it go on its bottom
#23
Posted 10 May 2012 - 07:07 AM
#24
Posted 10 May 2012 - 01:44 PM
#25
Posted 10 May 2012 - 02:23 PM
On second look... what the fuck is that outboard doing on the transom?! I think we need a caption contest...
I'll go first: "New design suggestions by Juan K for enhanced light air performance"
If the outboard is there as a backup, it's a very bad advertisement for Volvo engines...
Good for Volvo, Bad for BERG...
#26
Posted 10 May 2012 - 02:58 PM
They still have the daggerboards.The second engine is probably to compensate the loss of steerage of having no keel. This will prove very helpful while in the canal and going through some of those locks.
Joe
#27
Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:42 AM
They still have the daggerboards.
The second engine is probably to compensate the loss of steerage of having no keel. This will prove very helpful while in the canal and going through some of those locks.
Joe
Then maybe its to act as a thruster when maneuvering in the canal and the locks?
Joe
#28
Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:44 AM
And what's the structure build of 2" x 4" between the daggerboards? Have they pulled the pin and lifted the keel? Doesn't really look beefy enough for that application ... hmmmm
May as well take the keel out if it's too shallow
Edit: clearly I didn't read e whole thread before I posted.
And the comment about using the outboard as a thus tear is a great idea. I should assume that at low speed the turning circle wouldn't be great without a true keel
#29
Posted 14 May 2012 - 05:39 AM
Agreed that the outboard would enhance maneuverability. But "true keel" does not describe a canting keel very well. A canting keel is designed for ballast and not for hydrodynamic lift.
And what's the structure build of 2" x 4" between the daggerboards? Have they pulled the pin and lifted the keel? Doesn't really look beefy enough for that application ... hmmmm
May as well take the keel out if it's too shallow
Edit: clearly I didn't read e whole thread before I posted.
And the comment about using the outboard as a thus tear is a great idea. I should assume that at low speed the turning circle wouldn't be great without a true keel
#30
Posted 14 May 2012 - 07:26 AM
Agreed that the outboard would enhance maneuverability. But "true keel" does not describe a canting keel very well. A canting keel is designed for ballast and not for hydrodynamic lift.
And what's the structure build of 2" x 4" between the daggerboards? Have they pulled the pin and lifted the keel? Doesn't really look beefy enough for that application ... hmmmm
May as well take the keel out if it's too shallow
Edit: clearly I didn't read e whole thread before I posted.
And the comment about using the outboard as a thus tear is a great idea. I should assume that at low speed the turning circle wouldn't be great without a true keel
Good pooint. Damn I hate autocorrect on the IPad.
#31
Posted 23 May 2012 - 08:31 PM
#32
Posted 24 May 2012 - 02:22 PM
She's signed up for the Chicago Mac - not sure about the 'other' Mac though. Aka Bayview
What's the record for monohulls in the Chicago Mac? Does Il Mostro have a shot at setting a new one?
2N
#33
Posted 24 May 2012 - 04:05 PM
She's signed up for the Chicago Mac - not sure about the 'other' Mac though. Aka Bayview
What's the record for monohulls in the Chicago Mac? Does Il Mostro have a shot at setting a new one?
2N
The monohull record is a little less than 23.5 hours (I think) set in 2002. It would seem that this is within reach of Il Mostro. They would need to make an average VMG of 14.5 knots or better.
#34
Posted 03 June 2012 - 02:45 AM
#35
Posted 03 June 2012 - 01:56 PM
#36
Posted 04 June 2012 - 02:00 AM
#37
Posted 04 June 2012 - 05:33 PM
Please tell me you are joking....It did not meet the minimum stability index requirement...
#38
Posted 04 June 2012 - 05:52 PM
with or without keel?It did not meet the minimum stability index requirement...
#39
Posted 09 June 2012 - 01:04 AM
She's signed up for the Chicago Mac - not sure about the 'other' Mac though. Aka Bayview
What's the record for monohulls in the Chicago Mac? Does Il Mostro have a shot at setting a new one?
2N
The monohull record is a little less than 23.5 hours (I think) set in 2002. It would seem that this is within reach of Il Mostro. They would need to make an average VMG of 14.5 knots or better.
Math is not your strong suit - 289Nm in 23.5 hours is only 12.3 knots average
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












