Elliott 35SS
#1
Posted 21 May 2012 - 12:15 AM
$290k USD ex sails, electronics, etc....thing looks sweet!!
#3
Posted 21 May 2012 - 07:54 AM
#4
Posted 21 May 2012 - 11:33 AM
Any pics of it on a trailer?
Not what we define as a sportboat in NZ but..
A local here in Chch has ordered one I believe, although it will likely be kept in Auckland.
But watch out for the Shaw 11m http://www.shawyacht...om/SYDmenu.html, also another local, but he has to finish his second carbon Shaw 650 first.
#5
Posted 21 May 2012 - 01:10 PM
deserves a retracting flush drive
#6
Posted 22 May 2012 - 04:57 AM
Any pics of it on a trailer?
Not what we define as a sportboat in NZ but..
A local here in Chch has ordered one I believe, although it will likely be kept in Auckland.
But watch out for the Shaw 11m http://www.shawyacht...om/SYDmenu.html, also another local, but he has to finish his second carbon Shaw 650 first.
Looks like someone is finally building a modernised Young88:
Shaw 950
The Shaw 950 is a traditional style cruiser-racer that offers sufficient internal volume for standing headroom and all the comforts for family cruising, while being a competitive club and coastal racer.
Systems are set up so the boat is manageable for a regular club-racing crew to enjoy sailing the boat and extract a high level of the boat's potential. It hs a fixed keel and a diesel inboard.
Construction is underway, with glass laminates over a foam core, and a carbon rig.
The 950 has the popular Shaw boat attributes of being powerful, yet efficient and easy to handle.
Upwind 65m2
Jib 25m2
Gennaker 110m2
LOA 9.5m
LWL 8.9m
Beam 3.3m
Draft 2.5m
Displacement 2350kg
http://www.shawyacht...om/SYDmenu.html
FT Killer that you can weekend on too?
#7
Posted 22 May 2012 - 05:01 AM
Any pics of it on a trailer?
Not what we define as a sportboat in NZ but..
A local here in Chch has ordered one I believe, although it will likely be kept in Auckland.
But watch out for the Shaw 11m http://www.shawyacht...om/SYDmenu.html, also another local, but he has to finish his second modified carbon 6.5m boat designed by Shaw first.
Just to aid understanding; the one design Shaw 650 is a glass boat, not a carbon boat.
#8
Posted 22 May 2012 - 08:19 AM
http://www.sebschmid...ortfolio/09362/
Here other info and photo
http://www.facebook....179390108788160
#9
Posted 22 May 2012 - 09:48 AM
canting keel yachts
3mendo not comparable as the Elliott is an OCEAN racer
#10
Posted 22 May 2012 - 10:35 AM
Well there you go, I for one thought the Shaw was all carbon. makes the performance all the more impressive, but perhaps not the price.
Any pics of it on a trailer?
Not what we define as a sportboat in NZ but..
A local here in Chch has ordered one I believe, although it will likely be kept in Auckland.
But watch out for the Shaw 11m http://www.shawyacht...om/SYDmenu.html, also another local, but he has to finish his second modified carbon 6.5m boat designed by Shaw first.
Just to aid understanding; the one design Shaw 650 is a glass boat, not a carbon boat.
#11
Posted 24 September 2012 - 07:00 AM
#12
Posted 24 October 2012 - 07:50 PM
Man what a ride, the boat is seriously awesome. we smashed 2 hrs off the old 35ft and also shaved 30minutes off the 40ft record and now hold both.
Sending it hard, see the video link below.
https://vimeo.com/51989160
#13
Posted 27 October 2012 - 02:09 PM
This thing is a weapon. I jumped on last minute for the coastal classic after my ride (8.5multihull) pulled the pin due to the extreme forecast of 35-45kts
Man what a ride, the boat is seriously awesome. we smashed 2 hrs off the old 35ft and also shaved 30minutes off the 40ft record and now hold both.
Sending it hard, see the video link below.
https://vimeo.com/51989160
Good vid, good tunes.
#14
Posted 27 October 2012 - 03:20 PM
#15
Posted 27 October 2012 - 08:16 PM
it does not qualify
why not ask in an ocean racing forum for Ocean racing keelboats
#16
Posted 29 October 2012 - 10:17 AM
#17
Posted 29 October 2012 - 11:48 AM
#18
Posted 30 October 2012 - 03:52 AM
because the yachts you mention already qualify for another appropriate forum, thus duplication
You pedantic prick!
Sportsboat is a state of mind, not a formula.
Which part of this is not a sportsboat?
crusader%201.jpg 96.91K
123 downloads
crusader%201.jpg 96.91K
123 downloads
Attached Files
#19
Posted 30 October 2012 - 08:06 AM
because the yachts you mention already qualify for another appropriate forum, thus duplication
You pedantic prick!
Sportsboat is a state of mind, not a formula.
Which part of this is not a sportsboat?crusader%201.jpg 96.91K 123 downloads
crusader%201.jpg 96.91K 123 downloads
According to ASBA, everything past the first 8.5m.......
#20
Posted 30 October 2012 - 08:23 AM
#21
Posted 30 October 2012 - 10:41 AM
because the yachts you mention already qualify for another appropriate forum, thus duplication
You pedantic prick!
Sportsboat is a state of mind, not a formula.
Which part of this is not a sportsboat?crusader%201.jpg 96.91K 123 downloads
crusader%201.jpg 96.91K 123 downloads
According to ASBA, everything past the first 8.5m.......
Dont fucking kid yourself, at this point in time SMS is just as flawed as any other measurement system, except IRC because you can't fiddle with the numbers. Anyone who says they would rather sail an SB3 or some other shitbox so called ASBA measured boat rather than this Elliott35ss is a wanker. The vid looked awesome. The boat looks fast and I want one, but I still think the Cone would smoke it downwind. It was a fucking sportsboat and people should get off there high fucking horse and go yachting.
The problem we have at the moment, people who have built sporties to a rule and which boats are successful will need to change them because of the soon to be changed self righting rules. Ffs if what GYBSET says they should go sail a skiff because that's what these boats are. Please people get a life and chill the fuck out!
#22
Posted 30 October 2012 - 11:06 AM
Sportsboat is a state of mind,
Which part of this is not a sportsboat?
#23
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:45 PM
Sportsboat is a state of mind,
Which part of this is not a sportsboat?
Which is the part you can't afford!!!
#24
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:51 PM
#25
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:56 PM
Sportsboat is a state of mind,
Which part of this is not a sportsboat?
Gybeys vibrator?
#26
Posted 30 October 2012 - 01:03 PM
Sportsboat is a state of mind,
Which part of this is not a sportsboat?
Gybeys vibrator?
Which is the reason no one gives a fuck about this forum anymore. Gybesets fucked it for everyone.
#27
Posted 30 October 2012 - 01:24 PM
Any pics of it on a trailer?
Not what we define as a sportboat in NZ ..
#28
Posted 31 October 2012 - 04:04 AM
#29
Posted 31 October 2012 - 07:30 AM
I must have missed the meeting where we appointed New Zealand to define what is and isn't a sport boat. What a bunch of wankers. Your highest paid athlete was a caddy...who got fired.
....... by a multiple serial rooter who's done/won fuck all since
arsewipe
fucking seppos wouldn't know a fun boat if it bit them on the arse
BBOOOOOORRRRIIIIINNNGG
#30
Posted 31 October 2012 - 08:26 AM
Some fukn anger problems out there though.
http://racetrack.org...p?boatid=376721
Heres the rating. Not sure they have an IRC rating? I'd imagine it would be shit though
#31
Posted 31 October 2012 - 08:57 AM
I agree that this is not a sports boat. It's a pretty sweet keeler though.
Some fukn anger problems out there though.
http://racetrack.org...p?boatid=376721
Heres the rating. Not sure they have an IRC rating? I'd imagine it would be shit though
The story I heard was that a TP52 fucked a Shaw 650 after a huge night at the yachtie and gave birth to this thing.
#32
Posted 31 October 2012 - 06:51 PM
I must have missed the meeting where we appointed New Zealand to define what is and isn't a sport boat. What a bunch of wankers. Your highest paid athlete was a caddy...who got fired.
Its not the kiwis who are getting angry with it being in the sportboat forum either.........
Hell the NZ sport boat rule would be considered dangerous by most on here
#33
Posted 31 October 2012 - 07:49 PM
The story I heard was that a TP52 fucked a Shaw 650 after a huge night at the yachtie and gave birth to this thing.
Given the location and the canting keel it won't take a paternity test to work out the father was V5
#34
Posted 01 November 2012 - 06:08 AM
I agree that this is not a sports boat. It's a pretty sweet keeler though.
Some fukn anger problems out there though.
http://racetrack.org...p?boatid=376721
Heres the rating. Not sure they have an IRC rating? I'd imagine it would be shit though
The story I heard was that a TP52 fucked a Shaw 650 after a huge night at the yachtie and gave birth to this thing.
LIKE
#35
Posted 02 November 2012 - 10:44 AM
its got a diesel saildrive , its a yacht
deserves a retracting flush drive
Some things never change...
#36
Posted 02 November 2012 - 01:10 PM
35SS is a cat1 YACHT that can go in the Sydney Hobart YACHT race
sportsboats don't go in the Sydney Hobart, neither can trimarans or windsurfers
like you say i don't expect this will change
#37
Posted 02 November 2012 - 02:40 PM
#38
Posted 02 November 2012 - 06:14 PM
I must have missed the meeting where we appointed New Zealand to define what is and isn't a sport boat. What a bunch of wankers.
Its not New Zealand. Its a very small group of guys who log on to this site day after day to utter their BS pronouncements about what qualifies as a "sportsboat," even though that term doesn't have a commonly agreed upon set of defined parameters. Their attitude is not welcoming, its akin to that of an ultrastrict Muslim imam who is happiest tagging something as "infidel."
And as you might imagine, they're happiest declaring something as "not" a sportsboat. Check out "Gybe Set's" posts, I'd guess he's rendered that "service" a few hundred times.
For some personality types, nothing gives so much satisfaction as denying entrance into the club.
#39
Posted 03 November 2012 - 05:06 AM
evidence provided by talking about forum activities and NOTHING about a sail-boats physical characteristics
not surprisingly a lead-belly sailor and J/boat expert
say when J ran the (then) new j/80 by your J/24 mob, did youse all swallow the Kool-Aid when they told you it was a Sportsboat
like these chinamen who build 'em ?
#40
Posted 03 November 2012 - 05:16 AM
So because it doesn't fit your definition of a sportsboat it isn't one?
what an auspicious post ? SAs new DHOTW ?
Why TF would i call something a sportsboat if it was other than my view of one ?
anyway go ask your fellow Kiwi sportsboaters
Not what we define as a sportboat in NZ ..Any pics of it on a trailer?
http://www.tboat.com...sport-what.html
http://www.tboat.com/Editorials/Edit-designer/sport-design.html
#41
Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:04 AM
So because it doesn't fit your definition of a sportsboat it isn't one?
Why TF would i call something a sportsboat if it was other than my view of one ?
And your opinion is the only one that exists here? Seems your opinion is as highly respected and wanted as getting your dick caught in a zip...
#42
Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:16 AM
anyway did you ask your fellow Kiwis ?
seems you don't really want to find out,
& would rather diss some user on a forum instead, that being your purpose here today
anyway go ask your fellow Kiwi sportsboaters
http://www.tboat.com...sport-what.html
http://www.tboat.com/Editorials/Edit-designer/sport-design.htmlNot what we define as a sportboat in NZ ..Any pics of it on a trailer?
#43
Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:34 AM
why do you say that my opinion is the only one that exists here, that is a bit of a stretch m8, you are having problems with reality as well as Sportsboats ?
anyway did you ask your fellow Kiwis ?
seems you don't really want to find out,
& would rather diss someuserloser on a forum instead, that being your purpose here today
There you go. Fixed it for you!
#44
Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:38 AM
you are however my kind of kiwi m8, being in NZ
god bless you
#45
Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:45 AM
#46
Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:48 AM
I hope the weather is to your liking over there, and everything else
#47
Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:55 AM
#48
Posted 03 November 2012 - 07:02 AM
#49
Posted 05 November 2012 - 06:04 PM
Pathetic, just pathetic
evidence provided by talking about forum activities and NOTHING about a sail-boats physical characteristics
not surprisingly a lead-belly sailor and J/boat expert
say when J ran the (then) new j/80 by your J/24 mob, did youse all swallow the Kool-Aid when they told you it was a Sportsboat
like these chinamen who build 'em ?
But see, thats the point. I'm happy to discuss boat design, boat dimensions, though not with a know-it-all jerk like you.
You speak of "evidence," but you're not qualified to be a judge. And certainly not fair minded enough.
Hey, God bless. Maybe you're just a kidder. If so, I'm kidding too
#50
Posted 05 November 2012 - 07:17 PM
A Yachtie mentioned above it's a state of mind,
i know that's a stretch but maybe if you closed your eyes/took up the lotus position perchance?
Can all yacht & keelboat sailors call up this "Sportsboat Zen" on demand ?
#51
Posted 05 November 2012 - 09:10 PM
you're getting warmer, hell even a busted clock gets it right twice a day
yes. that's true
but you spend 24/7 acting like a dick
I don't think it's a 'sportsboat' either
....but I don't have to bang on about it
It's a pretty fucking cool sort of boat
whatever you want to call it
#52
Posted 05 November 2012 - 09:15 PM
Happy birthday for the other day bloke
#53
Posted 05 November 2012 - 09:26 PM
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=VEQdJ-2udJI
BTW what a fucken pisstake this thread has become, gybeset, take a chill pill. I couldn’t even be fucked reading all the crap so just skipped to the bottom.
Woop woop, the fucken sportsboat police.....
I am going to repost this in another thread so no one has to filter through all this bollocks. GYBE SET, please don’t even bother going there- no one wants to hear it.
#54
Posted 05 November 2012 - 09:48 PM
#55
Posted 06 November 2012 - 08:12 AM
#56
Posted 06 November 2012 - 08:37 AM
#57
Posted 06 November 2012 - 08:43 AM
Awesome boat and video. Thanks to those who made informative posts.
Looks like the cost is heading over the $600K mark!
#58
Posted 06 November 2012 - 09:07 AM
Just read through this thread expecting some insightful and educated comment about an exciting boat, unfortunately I wasted a lot of time reading some self indulgent drivel.
Awesome boat and video. Thanks to those who made informative posts.
Looks like the cost is heading over the $600K mark!
Gus that went out the window as soon as Gobshit started posting
#59
Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:33 AM
I don't think it's a 'sportsboat' either
.watever you want to call it
well yeah. its a fuckin cat 1 yacht for FFS
#60
Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:47 AM
leadbelly sailor
Just read through this thread expecting some insightful and educated comment about an exciting boat, unfortunately I wasted a lot of time reading some self indulgent drivel.
Awesome boat and video. Thanks to those who made informative posts.
Looks like the cost is heading over the $600K mark!
Gus that went out the window as soon as Gobshit started posting
old man
#61
Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:49 AM
aussie sportsoat at $ 65000.000 k huhJust read through this thread expecting some insightful and educated comment about an exciting boat, unfortunately I wasted a lot of time reading some self indulgent drivel.
Awesome boat and video. Thanks to those who made informative posts.
Looks like the cost is heading over the $600K mark!
reality check
#62
Posted 06 November 2012 - 05:48 PM
#63
Posted 06 November 2012 - 08:30 PM
a Mumm is a fixed 'keelboat' yeah
#64
Posted 07 November 2012 - 06:50 AM
Wow what a smackdownleadbelly sailor
old man
#66
Posted 08 November 2012 - 12:34 AM
because the yachts you mention already qualify for another appropriate forum, thus duplication
You pedantic prick!
Sportsboat is a state of mind, not a formula.
Which part of this is not a sportsboat?crusader%201.jpg 96.91K 123 downloads
crusader%201.jpg 96.91K 123 downloads
#67
Posted 08 November 2012 - 06:49 AM
Just to get something interesting in the thread again
because the yachts you mention already qualify for another appropriate forum, thus duplication
You pedantic prick!
Sportsboat is a state of mind, not a formula.
Which part of this is not a sportsboat?crusader%201.jpg 96.91K 123 downloads
crusader%201.jpg 96.91K 123 downloads
Looks like a big Cherub, goes downwind even faster!
#68
Posted 08 November 2012 - 07:44 AM
GybeSet you have single handedly ruined this thread with your pedantic shit. A while back mumm 30s popped up in Sportboat anarchy but I didn't see your nazi ways bulldoze those threads? Anyway back to the Elliott 35ss I think it's a pretty damn cool boat, it's such a shame boats like this stay more around the pacific like NZ, aus, west coast etc. I even remember there was a boat called Ambush from HK that looked pretty cool before they had the mills 41
A Hick 30 with a canter in her- she was a weapon as soon as you pointed her nose downwind! Unfortunately she could rarely sail to her rating so the owners just rocketed around the course until they got Mark Mills to design the new Ambush which is also a weapon, just a bit more restrained!
#69
Posted 11 November 2012 - 11:02 AM
#70
Posted 12 November 2012 - 05:09 AM
I calculate about AUD $450k with sails and instruments landed in Aus. At that price a little more than a MAC 38 last I checked. Unfortunatly unless you can get these types of boats to sail to their rating in at least favourable conditions, they tend to be orphans.Just read through this thread expecting some insightful and educated comment about an exciting boat, unfortunately I wasted a lot of time reading some self indulgent drivel.
Awesome boat and video. Thanks to those who made informative posts.
Looks like the cost is heading over the $600K mark!
#71
Posted 12 November 2012 - 06:25 AM
#72
Posted 12 November 2012 - 06:58 AM
It will be interesting to see if any of the new keelboat rules such as HPR can fix the orphan issue. It would be nice to see something similar to the super 30s expanding up the size range.I calculate about AUD $450k with sails and instruments landed in Aus. At that price a little more than a MAC 38 last I checked. Unfortunatly unless you can get these types of boats to sail to their rating in at least favourable conditions, they tend to be orphans.
#73
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:42 PM
It will be interesting to see if any of the new keelboat rules such as HPR can fix the orphan issue. It would be nice to see something similar to the super 30s expanding up the size range.
Perhaps but my guess is that it'll be as successful as IRM or less so since they've set it up from the outset for designers to game.
#74
Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:08 AM
#75
Posted 12 December 2012 - 08:23 AM
#77
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:09 AM
Would appreciate if available.
Tks
#78
Posted 24 December 2012 - 01:04 AM
it is obvious that it is a cool yacht so who gives a fuck what you call it.
#79
Posted 24 December 2012 - 03:37 AM
some of you cunts have too much time on your hands to argue about what sort of a boat it is
it is obvious that it is a cool yacht so who gives a fuck what you call it.
right. now that the FT10s are in here, surely there's room for the Elliott?
#80
Posted 24 December 2012 - 08:57 AM
HKG it's great you somehow made the time tosome of you cunts have too much time on your hands to argue about what sort of a boat it is
it is obvious that it is a cool yacht so who gives a fuck what you call it.
it's a very cool YACHT (that being the operative word)
cause the Ed thinks he was sailing a sportsboat and put the FT10 in here (trashcan forum?) ....
a sportsboat is now a cat1 keelboat
I 'get it'
can we just agree this is SO by decree
btw
How do you think the Viper will go in the transpac. or a Rocket 22 to Hobart
should a MC38 enter the Airlie sportsboat division? or the next lake taupo SB gig ?
,
#81
Posted 28 December 2012 - 10:13 AM
a yacht can be anything from a supermaxi to a dingy so by calling it a yacht you are not proving that it's not a sport boat you are merly proving that it is a boat that is powered by sails
Give up on your pointless argument
#82
Posted 28 December 2012 - 10:17 AM
#83
Posted 30 December 2012 - 08:31 AM
A ballasted monohull capable of sailing its own boatlength in 1 sec.
There are boats that can do this, everything else is a "sports yacht" or super 30 etc.
or whatever designation you want to use.
#84
Posted 31 December 2012 - 05:40 PM
How about this for a metric to define sportsboats:
A ballasted monohull capable of sailing its own boatlength in 1 sec.
There are boats that can do this, everything else is a "sports yacht" or super 30 etc.
or whatever designation you want to use.
#85
Posted 31 December 2012 - 08:36 PM
So a Vo70 doing 40 knots is not a sport boat because it takes a whole 1.06 seconds to sail it's own boat length?How about this for a metric to define sportsboats:
A ballasted monohull capable of sailing its own boatlength in 1 sec.
There are boats that can do this, everything else is a "sports yacht" or super 30 etc.
or whatever designation you want to use.
You have contrived a definition to try to justify your opinion that "sport boat" is less than some arbitrary length. The whole definitional controversy is boring and meaningless.
#86
Posted 01 January 2013 - 05:18 PM
I wouldn't call a V70 a sportboat anyway.So a Vo70 doing 40 knots is not a sport boat because it takes a whole 1.06 seconds to sail it's own boat length?
How about this for a metric to define sportsboats:
A ballasted monohull capable of sailing its own boatlength in 1 sec.
There are boats that can do this, everything else is a "sports yacht" or super 30 etc.
or whatever designation you want to use.
You have contrived a definition to try to justify your opinion that "sport boat" is less than some arbitrary length. The whole definitional controversy is boring and meaningless.
#87
Posted 01 January 2013 - 07:18 PM
You have contrived a definition to try to justify your opinion that "sport boat" is less than some arbitrary length.
it's not his opinion, it's true
you on the other hand who just walked in the door
#88
Posted 03 January 2013 - 03:57 PM
1. A displacement/length ratio less than 100
2. An upwind sail area/displacement ratio greater than 30
3. A downwind sail area displacement ratio greater than 75
4. A sprit length more than 50 percent of J
a VO70 fits the definition (I'm actually not sure of 4. - I couldn't find a measurement for the sprit). I'm sure that wasn't the intention of the rule, but hey, if the foo shits...
#89
Posted 03 January 2013 - 04:23 PM
You have contrived a definition to try to justify your opinion that "sport boat" is less than some arbitrary length.
it's not his opinion, it's true
19,233 posts and you are still FOS.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












