Oracle AC72
#2601
Posted 16 October 2012 - 06:17 AM
#2602
Posted 16 October 2012 - 06:23 AM
Thanks but thats not the video im talking about .For the record that video I posted is not today, that was 14 Sept.
http://acworldseries.blogspot.com/2012/10/louis-vuitton-cup-news-emirates-team-nz.html
#2603
Posted 16 October 2012 - 06:27 AM
Attached Files
#2604
Posted 16 October 2012 - 06:31 AM
#2605
Posted 16 October 2012 - 06:33 AM
Ah yes, that one is really goodThanks but thats not the video im talking about .
I've been wondering about that one too. Appears to be duct taped on in a very oddly bodge job fashion & i can't see any obvious function.What do you suppose that blue pipe is?
#2606
Posted 16 October 2012 - 06:43 AM
1. Pitot tube, but crap totally untuned attachment killed that.
b. An air injection system to the trailing edge of the wing - kind of like an afterburner???
c. Cooling system for the hydraulics.
4. Venturi system to suck any air out of the centrecases?
e. Air intake for the 'inflata'deck system.
6. Noisemaker for the video they send to Larry - the whistling makes it sound faster.
7. Air intake to blow the water away from the hull and make it fly.
#2607
Posted 16 October 2012 - 07:01 AM
I think you mean ScareCOW, a newbie from NZ, not ScareCROW, who is a respected member of the AUS sailing community!
Jeez, now we have Scarecrow as our new "child in learning the internet". Need to check the time he post to see if the parents are in bed.
Grow some short hair before you post idjet.
And Scarecow, you need to fulfill your newbie obligations.
Obligations? Whatever do you mean??
I took my dad's boat out on Friday afternoon. Just happened to catch New Zealand zooming up and down the Rangitoto Channel on its foils. As you do.
Video and pictures from other people have been shared on Sail-World and, of course, on here. Here are some pictures I took that afternoon:
Hailey was keen on sailing but didn't seem to really understand the implications of the ISAF International Jury's decision vis-a-vis PI22.

After some attempt at an explanation, we went downstairs so I could provide a practical demonstration of the nuances of the different positions for the daggerboard in measurement condition. It took a little while.
With your good selves in mind, I filmed parts of the demonstration. The idea being that such imagery would contribute to the conversation over the different design philosophies. However, when I uploaded the screenshots to the hosting site, I received an email almost immediately explaining that they were not able to publish such obscene material.
#2608
Posted 16 October 2012 - 07:22 AM
geez say the word tube around nz and look what happens
I think you mean ScareCOW, a newbie from NZ, not ScareCROW, who is a respected member of the AUS sailing community!
Jeez, now we have Scarecrow as our new "child in learning the internet". Need to check the time he post to see if the parents are in bed.
Grow some short hair before you post idjet.
And Scarecow, you need to fulfill your newbie obligations.
Obligations? Whatever do you mean??
I took my dad's boat out on Friday afternoon. Just happened to catch New Zealand zooming up and down the Rangitoto Channel on its foils. As you do.
Video and pictures from other people have been shared on Sail-World and, of course, on here. Here are some pictures I took that afternoon:
Hailey was keen on sailing but didn't seem to really understand the implications of the ISAF International Jury's decision vis-a-vis PI22.
After some attempt at an explanation, we went downstairs so I could provide a practical demonstration of the nuances of the different positions for the daggerboard in measurement condition. It took a little while.
With your good selves in mind, I filmed parts of the demonstration. The idea being that such imagery would contribute to the conversation over the different design philosophies. However, when I uploaded the screenshots to the hosting site, I received an email almost immediately explaining that they were not able to publish such obscene material.
#2609
Posted 16 October 2012 - 07:38 AM
I think you mean ScareCOW, a newbie from NZ, not ScareCROW, who is a respected member of the AUS sailing community!
Jeez, now we have Scarecrow as our new "child in learning the internet". Need to check the time he post to see if the parents are in bed.
Grow some short hair before you post idjet.
And Scarecow, you need to fulfill your newbie obligations.
Obligations? Whatever do you mean??
I motion that Scarecow receive Anarchist status. Some pictures are worth a thousand, uhm, posts.
#2610
Posted 16 October 2012 - 08:50 AM
..
They're out a fair way there now minimax.
Video or it didn't happen .
Plenty of good photos in quite decent chop in the Chris Cameron links in the ETNZ thread.
#2611
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:24 AM
#2612
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:25 AM
Im sure the designers knew it would twist a bit, thats the tradeoff with reducing the aero drag so much.
I am not sure why people assume that there is a trade off between structural stiffness and aerodynamic drag ..
because there is a min weight which is hard to get to.
If Oracle wanted to make there 72 less floppy, how do you think they would do it without adding weight or windage?
I cant accept you dont understand basic engineering principals?
#2613
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:33 AM
#2614
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:44 AM
the grey cable could be a wiring bundle from the wing sensors
but why is in the blue pipe and not properly mounted to the lower edge of the wing?
probably will be sorted soon
#2615
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:54 AM
#2616
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:58 AM
So jealous of all the guys on both 72 monsters at the moment. Crazy floppy, bucking bronco ride, or whatever us legends are saying on these forums - I'd give my left nut to be part of it!
#2617
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:04 AM
Serious question: Why cant SA do their journalistic duty and just hire a RIB for a day and shoot some decent video of the Batmobile?
#2618
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:16 AM
Im sure the designers knew it would twist a bit, thats the tradeoff with reducing the aero drag so much.
I am not sure why people assume that there is a trade off between structural stiffness and aerodynamic drag ..
because there is a min weight which is hard to get to.
If Oracle wanted to make there 72 less floppy, how do you think they would do it without adding weight or windage?
I cant accept you dont understand basic engineering principals?
I am quite familiar with basic engineering principals thank you .. what evidence do you have to support your claim "because there is a min weight which is hard to get to" ??
#2619
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:54 AM
Looks pretty blimming flat there compared to a lot of what we've seen ETNZ foiling stable in...
#2620
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:59 AM
+1
Serious question: Why cant SA do their journalistic duty and just hire a RIB for a day and shoot some decent video of the Batmobile?
Something wrong with these?
http://www.pressure-...Elusive-Big-Cat
#2621
Posted 16 October 2012 - 11:06 AM
+1
Serious question: Why cant SA do their journalistic duty and just hire a RIB for a day and shoot some decent video of the Batmobile?
Something wrong with these?
http://www.pressure-...Elusive-Big-Cat
No those are excellent pictures, although it would be nice to have them at their full resolution.
But it would be nice to see some more video from up close, maybe watch some tacks and gybes?
#2622
Posted 16 October 2012 - 02:18 PM
US Defender, Oracle Team USA completed seven days on the water today. Here's a gallery of images from team photographer Gullian Grenier taken over the past few days on San Francisco Bay.
While Oracle has been noted for the amount of platform twist, and discussions as to whether this is good or bad, planned or unplanned, controlled or uncontrolled, these images show that while she does adopt some fairly unusual flight modes - she is capable of untwisted foiling,
Photos by Grenier
#2623
Posted 16 October 2012 - 02:27 PM
#2624
Posted 16 October 2012 - 02:29 PM
Not sure if I have to understand your comment at 1st or 2nd degree.she is capable of untwisted foiling,
I said a couple of times here that OR seemed to flex less when foiling however i am not sure the photos proves it, if not the contrary.
Also, IMO it is clear that OR has to foil flat (just for the max use of the L) and it is not the case in most pictures, just because they seem so uneasy to fly that they have to push the boat.
One of the poster mentioned they yesterday they flied some times with BOTH rudders out ? that would be mad.
Anyway, strange that we never had any decent video of them foiling, tacking, gybing.
And waiting to see Artemis and (maybe?) LR
#2625
Posted 16 October 2012 - 02:44 PM
+1
Serious question: Why cant SA do their journalistic duty and just hire a RIB for a day and shoot some decent video of the Batmobile?
How many ribs for rent on SF Bay do you think can keep up with that thing?
#2626
Posted 16 October 2012 - 02:47 PM
I propose that SA rents Todd's Whaler, Clean will do 2 front pages stories for the price of one.
+1
Serious question: Why cant SA do their journalistic duty and just hire a RIB for a day and shoot some decent video of the Batmobile?
How many ribs for rent on SF Bay do you think can keep up with that thing?
#2627
Posted 16 October 2012 - 03:24 PM
=======================At Sail World: http://www.sail-worl...on-foils/102921
US Defender, Oracle Team USA completed seven days on the water today. Here's a gallery of images from team photographer Gullian Grenier taken over the past few days on San Francisco Bay.
While Oracle has been noted for the amount of platform twist, and discussions as to whether this is good or bad, planned or unplanned, controlled or uncontrolled, these images show that while she does adopt some fairly unusual flight modes - she is capable of untwisted foiling,
Photos by Grenier
While I'm convinced that Oracle can foil untwisted I don't think these pictures show it very well ,if at all.
#2628
Posted 16 October 2012 - 04:01 PM
I'm reserving my judgement till im in Auckland next week and can hopefully eyeball ETNZ in action.
#2629
Posted 16 October 2012 - 04:08 PM
..
They're out a fair way there now minimax.
Video or it didn't happen .
Plenty of good photos in quite decent chop in the Chris Cameron links in the ETNZ thread.
What part of the word VIDEO don't you understand ? You would think that by now there would be at least a few seconds of VIDEO of ET foiling in the feared gulf , if it happened .
#2630
Posted 16 October 2012 - 04:21 PM
Tonights content getting away from flew gate And the fact I just watched a new NZ video the tractors one scary machine . You can see there a lot gadgets here at work ©iSailmedia.com. And Luna Rossa Not far behind Houston we have a problem . Thank fully only one these will be coming our way after the LVC .
Who is the grinder on the right of the aft-most coffeegrinder above?
#2631
Posted 16 October 2012 - 04:30 PM
The Protocol for the 34th AC limits teams to building five pairs of daggerboards and it also appears that during the competition they can change their daggerboards daily to suit the anticipated conditions, although each time this would require them going through the procedure of obtaining a new measurement certificate.
Kramers points out making a call on which boards to use will be a difficult one. When you start races in San Francisco, the wind builds quite quickly.
sub required but: http://www.thedailys...-ac72-interview
#2632
Posted 16 October 2012 - 05:12 PM
He appears to have a beard, so my guess is Shannon Falcone.
Tonights content getting away from flew gate And the fact I just watched a new NZ video the tractors one scary machine . You can see there a lot gadgets here at work ©iSailmedia.com. And Luna Rossa Not far behind Houston we have a problem . Thank fully only one these will be coming our way after the LVC .
Who is the grinder on the right of the aft-most coffeegrinder above?
#2633
Posted 16 October 2012 - 05:51 PM
I could do it in Guitar's boat as long as they sailed where were going.
+1
Serious question: Why cant SA do their journalistic duty and just hire a RIB for a day and shoot some decent video of the Batmobile?
How many ribs for rent on SF Bay do you think can keep up with that thing?
Koukel
#2634
Posted 16 October 2012 - 06:07 PM
Shsss, the foils aren't done yet and the wing is still in testing.
#2635
Posted 16 October 2012 - 07:11 PM
This has been discussed before and I am not sure he is correct. I believe he isn't considering the followingI re-read the Dail Sail interview with Dirk Cramers and saw this little tidbit:
The Protocol for the 34th AC limits teams to building five pairs of daggerboards and it also appears that during the competition they can change their daggerboards daily to suit the anticipated conditions, although each time this would require them going through the procedure of obtaining a new measurement certificate.
Kramers points out making a call on which boards to use will be a difficult one. When you start races in San Francisco, the wind builds quite quickly.
sub required but: http://www.thedailys...-ac72-interview
The consensus of the last discussion was that this means you hav eto use whatever you start the regatta with. It will be interesting to see what actually happens27.3 Competitors shall obtain written approval of the Measurement Committee prior to making
any repairs or replacements.
27.4 The Measurement Committee will only give written approval to replace an item when they
are satisfied that the damaged item cannot be repaired in a reasonable regatta-constrained
timeframe.
#2636
Posted 16 October 2012 - 07:27 PM
#2637
Posted 16 October 2012 - 07:29 PM
--
Jimmy Spithill joins the US Navy's Blue Angels demonstration squad in "Fightertown USA," Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, to test his mettle at winged flight of a slightly faster kind. See how ORACLE TEAM USA's skipper and chief "pilot" handles 6G's in the skies over San Diego.
#2638
Posted 16 October 2012 - 08:19 PM
#2639
Posted 16 October 2012 - 08:35 PM
========================This has been discussed before and I am not sure he is correct. I believe he isn't considering the following
I re-read the Dail Sail interview with Dirk Cramers and saw this little tidbit:
The Protocol for the 34th AC limits teams to building five pairs of daggerboards and it also appears that during the competition they can change their daggerboards daily to suit the anticipated conditions, although each time this would require them going through the procedure of obtaining a new measurement certificate.
Kramers points out making a call on which boards to use will be a difficult one. When you start races in San Francisco, the wind builds quite quickly.
sub required but: http://www.thedailys...-ac72-interviewThe consensus of the last discussion was that this means you hav eto use whatever you start the regatta with. It will be interesting to see what actually happens27.3 Competitors shall obtain written approval of the Measurement Committee prior to making
any repairs or replacements.
27.4 The Measurement Committee will only give written approval to replace an item when they
are satisfied that the damaged item cannot be repaired in a reasonable regatta-constrained
timeframe.
I think that video the other day showing Oracle assembling the foil to the daggerboard so it could easily be changed out is a clue that they believe what Cramer said in the interview. Their system allows just the foil-not the whole daggerboard-to be changed.
#2640
Posted 16 October 2012 - 08:36 PM
I wonder if the motion sickness in the blue angels clip is worse than what he gets on Batzilla?
There have been no reported instances of motion sickness on US-17. Oh wait I get it , that was a joke . You kids are just so funny these days I swear
#2641
Posted 16 October 2012 - 08:48 PM
#2642
Posted 16 October 2012 - 08:57 PM
under NDAThere have been no reported instances of motion sickness on US-17.
#2643
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:11 PM
========================
This has been discussed before and I am not sure he is correct. I believe he isn't considering the following
I re-read the Dail Sail interview with Dirk Cramers and saw this little tidbit:
The Protocol for the 34th AC limits teams to building five pairs of daggerboards and it also appears that during the competition they can change their daggerboards daily to suit the anticipated conditions, although each time this would require them going through the procedure of obtaining a new measurement certificate.
Kramers points out making a call on which boards to use will be a difficult one. When you start races in San Francisco, the wind builds quite quickly.
sub required but: http://www.thedailys...-ac72-interviewThe consensus of the last discussion was that this means you hav eto use whatever you start the regatta with. It will be interesting to see what actually happens27.3 Competitors shall obtain written approval of the Measurement Committee prior to making
any repairs or replacements.
27.4 The Measurement Committee will only give written approval to replace an item when they
are satisfied that the damaged item cannot be repaired in a reasonable regatta-constrained
timeframe.
I think that video the other day showing Oracle assembling the foil to the daggerboard so it could easily be changed out is a clue that they believe what Cramer said in the interview. Their system allows just the foil-not the whole daggerboard-to be changed.
Measurement Committee
Interpretation No. 19
of
AC72 Class Rule
Version 1.1 : 22nd February, 2011
Rule Reference:
AC72 Class Rule
8.6 and 9.6 infer that appendages may be made of more than 1 component. This is supported by rule 27.2© that discusses "surfaces" of an appendage, as opposed to a single surface of an appendage.
8.6
Rudders shall not have components such as trim tabs or moveable winglets, that can be adjusted while racing. However, a movable or retractable device whose sole purpose is the removal of weed or debris is permitted.
9.6
Daggerboards shall not have components such as trim tabs or moveable winglets that can be adjusted while racing; however, a movable or retractable device the sole purpose of which is the removal of weed or debris is permitted.
27.2
Except for repair of, or replacement for, unintended damage, the measurement certificate ceases to be valid if there is any change to:
( c ) the shape of the appendage surfaces;
Question:
A rudder has near horizontal winglets whose angle to the near vertical component of the rudder is fixed when racing. When not racing, the angle of these winglets can be adjusted so only the pitch of the winglets will change. The immersed volume, weight and center of gravity of the rudder would not measurably change
.
Does the measurement certificate remain valid if between races this angle is adjusted but the surface shape of each component of the rudder does not change?
Answer:
No. Adjusting the angle of one surface of an appendage relative to another surface of that appendage constitutes a change to the shape of the appendage surfaces, and invalidates the yacht's measurement certificate in accordance with AC72 Class Rule 27.2 ( c ).
http://noticeboard.a...11/09/PI_19.pdf
#2644
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:11 PM
Any action at the batcave today?
#2645
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:15 PM
I spent an hour watching their foiling attempts on the bay yesterday... Shot a couple of minutes of consecutive footage with the iPhone I had on me at the time. It's not a smooth or pretty process getting her up on the foils and it's not long before she crashed back down to earth. No foiling episode lasted longer than 30 seconds from leeward bow up lift off to windward bow down fully loaded up landings.. you could literally see the effects of the platform flex from over a mile away with the naked eye. They also sailed with a lot of heel downwind between foilings...
I'm reserving my judgement till im in Auckland next week and can hopefully eyeball ETNZ in action.
...being mega jealous...
#2646
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:21 PM
Although it would be a honor to fly with the Blue Angels, I would prefer to watch the video. Even that made me queezy. Ugh.
+1
My ride would consist of a photo op in the cockpit sitting on the tarmack, after that "i'm all good guys, have a nice flight..."
#2647
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:22 PM
Getting in the way?Watching on the St. Francis race cam and a bunch of J105s keep getting in the way while flogging their sails to death. Looks messy out there.
Any action at the batcave today?
Does that mean the bat boat is out?
#2648
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:24 PM
#2649
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:26 PM
Well and truly out there, and practicing the up, up, splat routine.
Looks awesomely fast when they get it right, and with the guys on board - you know they will. Eventually...
Blowing seriously hard out there too. Hope we get some high-res images from today.
Calling Clean - get down there and do what we all pay you handsomely to do!
#2650
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:30 PM
oops, just saw the download JAVA.
#2651
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:30 PM
Its an interesting thing that they seem to crash down windward hull first most of the time.No foiling episode lasted longer than 30 seconds from leeward bow up lift off to windward bow down fully loaded up landings..
ETNZ footage/pics show they sometimes drop the windward hull but can generally sail it out after a short kiss, most of the time the lift offs & drops are smooth though.
Can you get that footage up on youtube?
Looking forward to your report on comparison with ETNZ foiling in a couple of weeks
#2652
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:33 PM
Blowing seriously hard out there too
24 kts gusting to 29 ...
#2653
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:36 PM
#2654
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:39 PM
#2655
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:44 PM
========================
This has been discussed before and I am not sure he is correct. I believe he isn't considering the following
I re-read the Dail Sail interview with Dirk Cramers and saw this little tidbit:
The Protocol for the 34th AC limits teams to building five pairs of daggerboards and it also appears that during the competition they can change their daggerboards daily to suit the anticipated conditions, although each time this would require them going through the procedure of obtaining a new measurement certificate.
Kramers points out making a call on which boards to use will be a difficult one. When you start races in San Francisco, the wind builds quite quickly.
sub required but: http://www.thedailys...-ac72-interviewThe consensus of the last discussion was that this means you hav eto use whatever you start the regatta with. It will be interesting to see what actually happens27.3 Competitors shall obtain written approval of the Measurement Committee prior to making
any repairs or replacements.
27.4 The Measurement Committee will only give written approval to replace an item when they
are satisfied that the damaged item cannot be repaired in a reasonable regatta-constrained
timeframe.
I think that video the other day showing Oracle assembling the foil to the daggerboard so it could easily be changed out is a clue that they believe what Cramer said in the interview. Their system allows just the foil-not the whole daggerboard-to be changed.
The rule is clear that you can only have one measurement certificate at a time. By definition if you get a second certificate (necessary to know that your boat actually passes) then at some point you must have two certificates. There doesn't seem to be any way for a competitor to voluntarily withdraw a certificate, so you can't get into a zero-certificate state mid-series. There doesn't seem to be anyway for a measurement certificate to be withdrawn by the measurers, unless there was a change in a part on the Measurement Form, in which case the whole boat has to be remeasured (unless otherwise prescribed by the class rule). Plus there is a certificate publication process which also needs to be complied with as well as just issuing the piece of paper to the teams. The bad news is that the latest Jury decision made it plain that the rules will be interpreted as written, not as intended or conveniently construed. The penalty for racing with an invalid certificate is usually disqualification from all races sailed with the invalid certificate/mode. Protest on measurement must usually be lodged as soon as the issue is known to another competitor and/or after the boat has sailed in its "new" mode.
The other issue is that in its stance on the measurement condition issue, ACRM is clearly independent - and won't just blindly follow the Defender and Challenger of Record line. Interesting times.
RG
#2656
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:47 PM
#2657
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:48 PM
#2658
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:48 PM
#2659
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:49 PM
#2660
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:52 PM
#2661
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:54 PM
And not all know how to use itvarious camera operators as well.
#2662
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:00 PM
A guy on the other site (fototaker) got some great shots from yesterday including a fully flat foil (fff). I won't post pressure drop pictures here, you would need to go there to see their stuff. I don't think he's posted his picasa link for everyone to see but *pb posted some.
Jib only downwind ride?
#2663
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:08 PM
#2664
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:09 PM

She just went over!
#2665
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:09 PM
#2666
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:09 PM
#2667
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:09 PM
#2668
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:10 PM
#2669
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:10 PM
how long will it take to get back up
do they have a mega tender?
it seems to be moving upwind even while the tramp is catching the wind so it must be under tow
or at least being held while they work out what to do
can't pull it back up on that angle...
#2670
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:10 PM
Saw it live!Oracle over????
#2671
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:10 PM


#2672
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:11 PM
#2673
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:11 PM
#2674
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:12 PM
#2675
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:12 PM
Yeah just making sure my mind wasn't playing tricks!!! Really big gust spray everywhere...... bore away slightly, up up up, gone!Saw it live!
Oracle over????
#2676
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:12 PM
#2677
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:12 PM
#2678
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:13 PM
#2679
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:13 PM
#2680
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:13 PM

Tenders in place already. Looks like a safe position to be in.
#2681
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:14 PM
#2682
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:15 PM
#2683
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:15 PM
#2684
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:16 PM
Really hope everyone is ok.
#2685
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:16 PM
#2686
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:16 PM
#2687
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:16 PM
#2688
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:17 PM
#2689
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:19 PM

Ok, hard to watch the tow in.
#2690
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:21 PM
More difficult to right her than an AC45.
Where is MK II ?
#2691
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:22 PM
that big cat that went behind with reefed sail must have some good pics
looks like they are towing it back to base
that wing is toast
hope the spars are ok
#2692
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:22 PM
#2693
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:23 PM
#2694
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:24 PM
http://207.150.197.186
Well and truly out there, and practicing the up, up, splat routine.
Looks awesomely fast when they get it right, and with the guys on board - you know they will. Eventually...
...
Hope they learn it sooner rather than later, before they bellyflop USA17 into the repair shop.
Oooops just seen the report of the pitchpole..hope nobody's injured.
#2695
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:25 PM
#2696
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:27 PM
StFYC cam is under control of someone now. Not sharing.
#2697
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:28 PM
#2698
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:30 PM
#2699
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:33 PM
#2700
Posted 16 October 2012 - 10:35 PM














