#1
Posted 04 September 2012 - 03:45 PM
http://www.history.c...&p=2&s=dd#video
You may have to refresh it to make it work.
#2
Posted 04 September 2012 - 04:07 PM
I will say that on Monday, Lake Superior was glass.
Before getting our boat on the Great Lakes, we would visit the North Shore at least twice a year. Rarely did we witness calm conditions. Usually it was pretty rolly and choppy. With our impending arrival to Superior, we would go down to the shore and just shake our heads at the rollers coming in and breaking against the rocks. More than once we've witnessed huge seas breaking against the shoreline and splashing up on HWY 61. Hell, even standing by the entrance to the lift bridge, the swells looked intimidating.
I can't say we've totally lost our Great Lakes virginity, but at least based on our benign little adventure this weekend it seemed less intimidating.
I think the biggest challenge is how quickly it can change. Note the thread about the poor 9 y.o. kid who died from a lightning strike. 2 hours before that, it was sunny, warm, calm. And for the 80% of the time it's pleasant, the other 20% is pure hell.

#3
Posted 04 September 2012 - 06:00 PM
I think the biggest challenge is how quickly it can change. Note the thread about the poor 9 y.o. kid who died from a lightning strike. 2 hours before that, it was sunny, warm, calm. And for the 80% of the time it's pleasant, the other 20% is pure hell.
Whenever I deliver boats up and down the Lake (Michigan), seems like it's always 65% fun, 15% boredom and 20% sheer terror.
#4
Posted 04 September 2012 - 06:15 PM
I think the biggest challenge is how quickly it can change. Note the thread about the poor 9 y.o. kid who died from a lightning strike. 2 hours before that, it was sunny, warm, calm. And for the 80% of the time it's pleasant, the other 20% is pure hell.
Whenever I deliver boats up and down the Lake (Michigan), seems like it's always 65% fun, 15% boredom and 20% sheer terror.
Friend of mine sailed in Chi Mac race. That was pretty much her account. At one point they had been screaming along and the wind sorta died, but the lake was still a mess. Their J80 was getting tossed all over the place. On top of that, they were flying a chute. Suddenly the wind picked up again and laid them sideways. She said all she could remember was being absolutely paralyzed. She could hear the crew yelling at her to blow the chute, but she was completely frozen and clingling to the mast.
And this girl was one of those tough-as-nails chicks who you wouldn't in your wildest dreams imagine cowering. But she did.
#5
Posted 04 September 2012 - 08:22 PM
Attached Files
#6
Posted 04 September 2012 - 08:37 PM
What year did the J/80 do the "Chi Mac?"Friend of mine sailed in Chi Mac race. That was pretty much her account. At one point they had been screaming along and the wind sorta died, but the lake was still a mess. Their J80 was getting tossed all over the place. On top of that, they were flying a chute. Suddenly the wind picked up again and laid them sideways. She said all she could remember was being absolutely paralyzed. She could hear the crew yelling at her to blow the chute, but she was completely frozen and clingling to the mast.
And this girl was one of those tough-as-nails chicks who you wouldn't in your wildest dreams imagine cowering. But she did.
#7
Posted 04 September 2012 - 08:45 PM
#8
Posted 05 September 2012 - 05:33 PM
We headed to Isle Royale from Houghton (80NM) in 22K of NE. The waves quickly built to 13 feet, and are almost sinusoidal. We had friends in an Express 37 that 'raced' with us up, and took these pictures. He said we often completely disappeared from sight.



An hour or so later, nearing the island, the wind drops down 6 knots to 16 and the waves go right down to 6 feet. We jib reach towards our harbor.

Down to seven knots and the lake flattens right out. Deep asym reaches the rest of the way.

Add to this wild thunderstorms, crazy thick fog, and typically cold water, and it can be intimidating. At the very least, well respected and traversed in decent sized boats. There are NO boats under 30 feet at our marina. 90% have radar. For good reason.
#9
Posted 06 September 2012 - 11:47 AM
I was under the impression that the waves on superior were more round than steep. Could just be our different corners of the lake too. The couple of times I've been out in "big" waves of 8ft+ they've been more of a big swell, with the wind chop on top. This is usually after a strong northerly once the winds have died down somewhat. Don't think I've been out in 22kts of north or east wind. I've done 30+ from the south but the lake is flat at that point
I really need to try and get video of some of the storms that should be starting to come through any time now. Even in your pics JD the waves don't look big at all until you capture one with your boat in the trough.
#10
Posted 06 September 2012 - 03:40 PM
Yea in pictures the telephoto really hides the height of the waves. In that last pix (which is a zoomed crop of a bigger image) there are at least 4 troughs that could have covered the boat
#11
Posted 06 September 2012 - 03:51 PM
#12
Posted 06 September 2012 - 08:08 PM
It depends upon the lake, and , more importantly, the location on the lake. Each lake has it's own flavour. Erie is essentially a big shallow pond- it's not unusual, in a good blow, to see the water level change 2-3 feet as the lake gets blown around. it also has a relatively short fetch compared to Michigan or Superior,. or even Huron prevailing winds out of the SW in spring and summer and NE in fall and winter mean that they blow only 35-45 miles shore to shore. Add to that the shallow depth, and typically huron swells are like my first wife- short, square, nasty, mean, and quick to get angry.My guess is that most wave action on the Lakes is caused by fetch rather than swells which are caused by gravity. At least that's my understanding of swells.
#13
Posted 06 September 2012 - 08:51 PM
Down south - Chicago - the lake can be challenging - steep, short waves. I guess due to the fetch (300 miles worth) and shallow water. Farther north it seems more benign - though I've been in many storms I've never been concerned about the waves - just the wind. I've only passed through the north during the Mac race though - so same place/time every year.
#14
Posted 07 September 2012 - 01:53 PM
The biggest seas I have experienced were ~22 feet. They get very steep and the period extremely short.
That lake can make you feel real small in a hurry. The power is awesome and unforgettable.
I love it.
#15
Posted 07 September 2012 - 06:29 PM
#16
Posted 07 September 2012 - 08:07 PM
Nothing quite like a 3 second period to ruin the ride unless you're on a 1,000 foot lake freighter.
#17
Posted 07 September 2012 - 10:46 PM
#18
Posted 08 September 2012 - 01:59 AM
#19
Posted 08 September 2012 - 04:52 PM
#20
Posted 09 September 2012 - 05:46 AM
They are real and have to be really big since they stand out on the horizon and are unmistakable.
I've been caught in them before. You cannot control your boat in them. You just kinda go with it until it ends.
It's kinda fun going 15 knots in a 4KSB. After 3 years and you've thrown your soiled underwear out...
#21
Posted 09 September 2012 - 09:32 PM
with a strong westwind that lasts, the western end of erie can drop dramatically.It depends upon the lake, and , more importantly, the location on the lake. Each lake has it's own flavour. Erie is essentially a big shallow pond- it's not unusual, in a good blow, to see the water level change 2-3 feet as the lake gets blown around.
#22
Posted 10 September 2012 - 06:30 AM
That Erie pic is....eerie
#23
Posted 11 September 2012 - 11:54 AM
#24
Posted 11 September 2012 - 12:05 PM
From a high vantage point the big waves on superior look pretty spread out. 100 or 200 yards peak to peak maybe? Hard to judge from a distance and on shore. Giant swells of water marching along. Accounting for rogue waves and maximum blah blah blah I think waves of over 50ft are possible on superior in ideal conditions.
#25
Posted 12 September 2012 - 05:36 PM
#26
Posted 30 September 2012 - 06:03 PM
#27
Posted 14 October 2012 - 02:13 AM
Attached Files
#28
Posted 14 October 2012 - 10:59 AM
#29
Posted 14 October 2012 - 11:11 AM
#30
Posted 14 October 2012 - 11:18 AM
It doesn't even have to be a "Great" lake to scare the crap out of you!
#31
Posted 14 October 2012 - 02:20 PM
This wasn't a dry Summer...at least not THAT dry...the GLs are being drained. Time for our US friend to start making some noise.
No, it was really dry actually. That and our last non-winter was not good.
Don't forget, the GL basin feeds that water table of the areas around it and vice versa.
I was at the cottage last week, and I will say the lake is as low as it was in the 1970s.
Then, by 1987 or so, we had to build a seawall or lose the house.
We built that seawall twice because Lake Michigan came up so hard.
Now it's under 15 feet of sand, boulders and all.
#32
Posted 16 October 2012 - 01:14 PM
I pulled my boat out and trailered it home last weekend. Had been sitting a month without being used. Every weekend had been cold and rainy with strong north winds making sailing a no go.
#33
Posted 16 October 2012 - 01:20 PM
Nice to see there is a plan in place.
Attached Files
#34
Posted 16 October 2012 - 03:07 PM
When they finally drain Superior...we can still sail!!
Nice to see there is a plan in place.
Plan?? Here's the plan.
We 'donate' 74,000 cubic feet of water per second to Lake Huron.
When the water level to Pikes Bay marina drops to 8 feet, we bomb the river shut.
#35
Posted 17 October 2012 - 02:03 PM
#36
Posted 17 October 2012 - 03:37 PM
#37
Posted 18 October 2012 - 01:27 PM
"Well we were stunned last weekend in Lost bay when the water was so low. I looked on the internet and on Sunday - the water was 17" below chart datum in Parry Sound and in Collingwood was 20" below datum - so I looked for the water all around Lake huron and Lake Michigan - and couldn't see where it was higher than previous weeks - generally it was 10 - 15" below datum. and was low all over. Little Current also showed 18" below datum..
http://www.great-lak...cur/hurwlc.html
On the latest news - it is apparently a dought year and this is not helping - water is expected to go even lower - so be prepared. Here is a story I found. It's not pretty. Water will be 18" below Datum (long term average was about a foot above datum) this means that water will be a foot lower than last year over the year.
Lake Huron Chart Datum = 176.0 - Record Low was 175.58 - which is .42 m below datum (16.5")
Pray for snow".
"Portions of the Great Lakes are forecast to near or sink to record lows as a result of ongoing drought conditions over the next few months.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) reported Tuesday that the water level on Lake Michigan-Huron will match the record-low water levels, previously set in 1964, in November and December and then set new record lows in January through March 2013.
The Army Corps is also predicting that Lake Superior will be only one inch above the record low water level set in 1925 by late October and then three to five inches above record low water levels from November through March.
The precipitation on the Lake Michigan-Huron basin was reported 74% of average in September and 92% of average over the past 12 months.
The water levels are expected to be 28 to 29 inches below their long-term average through March 2013, which would be 11 to 17 inches below last year’s levels.
The provisional water supply for Lake Superior was the driest on record for September, according to the Army Corps. The water supply is primarily a combination of precipitation falling on the lake surface, runoff from precipitation falling on the land which flows to the lake, and evaporation from the lake."
#38
Posted 18 October 2012 - 01:31 PM
#39
Posted 18 October 2012 - 01:37 PM
#40
Posted 18 October 2012 - 02:03 PM
Jackdaw......does your chainsaw cut thru lead? if so, i need to borrow it after your finished with it.......
Start scanning Craigslist for a shoal keel.......
#41
Posted 18 October 2012 - 03:47 PM
#42
Posted 18 October 2012 - 04:24 PM
#43
Posted 05 November 2012 - 01:49 AM
I spent time on my 22 footer out of Duluth, Bayfield and Munising. Always was looking over my shoulder ready to run for port.
We have a Crealock 34 now, nice Lake Superior boat. It seems strong enough to take anything that builds in a day. The real heavy weather on Lake Superior takes several days to build so there is almost always time to get off the lake.
Lake Superior is fun, because as the pictures above show you can get to test all your sail configurations in one day. You get to try out all your clothing configurations too.
#44
Posted 05 November 2012 - 03:36 AM
Incidentally (or not) this is the same channel that took Barracuda out after the Mac race a few years ago.
I used to fish off the wall for perch where that person is standing.
#45
Posted 05 November 2012 - 04:26 AM
Was talking to a friend of mine a few weeks ago who sailed on Lakers (ships) on the Great Lakes in the early 70s. He said the ships twisted through the waves, he could see the twist walking between cabins in heavy weather.
I spent time on my 22 footer out of Duluth, Bayfield and Munising. Always was looking over my shoulder ready to run for port.
We have a Crealock 34 now, nice Lake Superior boat. It seems strong enough to take anything that builds in a day. The real heavy weather on Lake Superior takes several days to build so there is almost always time to get off the lake.
Lake Superior is fun, because as the pictures above show you can get to test all your sail configurations in one day. You get to try out all your clothing configurations too.
Shane, where do you keep your boat?
#46
Posted 05 November 2012 - 01:13 PM
#47
Posted 05 November 2012 - 04:54 PM
I see you're a bit of a virgin here at Cruising Anarchy. Someone should give you a proper greeting that you would understand. Being from Oz and all
#48
Posted 05 November 2012 - 05:38 PM
Being an ex Aussie I guess it's my duty. Seems Sons is going soft on us.
We have rules here. In order to post on CA you must post some pictures of women with their shirts off. It's a rule. Technicaly it should be your wife but we have never seen your wife and you may not even have one so any nice pair of tits will work.
#49
Posted 05 November 2012 - 05:50 PM
Attached Files
#50
Posted 05 November 2012 - 06:22 PM
Well done. I think my Dad has some pics of the same gal from when he was in NG in WWII.
While it works for me you might have some trouble with the other board members here.
#51
Posted 05 November 2012 - 06:42 PM
#52
Posted 05 November 2012 - 09:33 PM
Born on Moreton Bay ( Redcliffe) but grew up in Port Moresby.
Well played. But I think I've see her on Isle Royale. I think.
#53
Posted 10 November 2012 - 09:47 PM
snow baby....snow
#54
Posted 12 November 2012 - 04:51 PM
#55
Posted 12 November 2012 - 05:52 PM
Tantalizing flurries this morning, but nothing significant.
#56
Posted 12 November 2012 - 06:04 PM
According to a bunch of guys with PhDs and stuff, the drought we experienced last year is just the beginning. Supposedly going to get much, much worse. I say its time we start sacrificing virgins. Not in a 'throw 'em in a volcano' sort of sacrifice. More like 'polishing my wood' sort of sacrifice.
We should start an upswing soon if you listen to the old codgers.
It's amazing and almost scary how fast Lake MI can come up.
I remember in the '80's it came up with such ferocity the pounding waves made our house shake.
Still have nightmares about that. I don't think our house is very seaworthy.
#57
Posted 13 November 2012 - 04:39 PM
Believe me I hope it does come up fast and soon too. (God this is going to sound like it belongs in PA) However I believe that some of the reasons the water is low isn't weather related. There are a lot more people on the planet now and the supply of fresh water isn't increasing at the same levels.
According to a bunch of guys with PhDs and stuff, the drought we experienced last year is just the beginning. Supposedly going to get much, much worse. I say its time we start sacrificing virgins. Not in a 'throw 'em in a volcano' sort of sacrifice. More like 'polishing my wood' sort of sacrifice.
We should start an upswing soon if you listen to the old codgers.
It's amazing and almost scary how fast Lake MI can come up.
I remember in the '80's it came up with such ferocity the pounding waves made our house shake.
Still have nightmares about that. I don't think our house is very seaworthy.
#58
Posted 13 November 2012 - 06:03 PM
Serves to say the GL basin needs water and leave it at that.
#59
Posted 13 November 2012 - 10:29 PM
#60
Posted 14 November 2012 - 01:32 PM
#61
Posted 14 November 2012 - 02:06 PM
fresh water isn't increasing at the same levels.
well, it is 'increasing' at the same levels if you mean by 'increasing' that it's 'staying the same'. The amount of fresh water on the planet has changed very little over the past, what, 200 million years? The issue is distribution.
This is a pretty good (a-political) article on drought. We are just in a bad cycle right now and there is historical evidence that it has been worse in the past (prior to us humans supposedly mucking everything up).
Also, there is very little influence from the Great Lakes on the Mississippi River. The River originates in Lake Itasca in Northern Minnesota. And while the Illinois River connects the Mississippi river with Lake Michigan, I'd say that's a pretty small contribution.
#62
Posted 14 November 2012 - 04:58 PM
And while the Illinois River connects the Mississippi river with Lake Michigan, I'd say that's a pretty small contribution.
fresh water isn't increasing at the same levels.
2000 million gallons per day. 3200 cfs. gone from Lake Michigan
#63
Posted 14 November 2012 - 05:40 PM
And while the Illinois River connects the Mississippi river with Lake Michigan, I'd say that's a pretty small contribution.
fresh water isn't increasing at the same levels.
2000 million gallons per day. 3200 cfs. gone from Lake Michigan
And of course, it didn't reach the lakes at all back in the day. The current flow is the result of the Chicago Sanitary District reversing the flow of the Chicago River so that Chicago sewerage flowed away from the city (and its drinking water supply) and on down the river.
farsideanimalwastemanagement.jpg 68.82K
21 downloads
#64
Posted 14 November 2012 - 06:13 PM
And of course, it didn't reach the lakes at all back in the day. The current flow is the result of the Chicago Sanitary District reversing the flow of the Chicago River so that Chicago sewerage flowed away from the city (and its drinking water supply) and on down the river.
farsideanimalwastemanagement.jpg 68.82K 21 downloads
This from the same folks that will be bringing Asian Carp to the Great Lakes. Way to go, Chicago!
#65
Posted 14 November 2012 - 07:11 PM
And while the Illinois River connects the Mississippi river with Lake Michigan, I'd say that's a pretty small contribution.
fresh water isn't increasing at the same levels.
2000 million gallons per day. 3200 cfs. gone from Lake Michigan
sure, 'gone' from Lake Michigan, but my point was its contribution to the Mississippi river. With the Mississippi River at 300,000 cfs, the Illinois River contributes a whopping 1%. Damn it up and no one would notice.
#66
Posted 14 November 2012 - 08:06 PM
#67
Posted 14 November 2012 - 09:46 PM
That might add a bit of a shitty taste to the water in Chicago . .it did once before and killed off a bunch
You're saying this is a bad thing?
#68
Posted 15 November 2012 - 09:29 PM
Attached Files
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












