#501
Posted 02 November 2012 - 02:52 AM
#502
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:02 AM
#503
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:16 AM
Attached Files
#504
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:19 AM
Lots of wheelies and up/downs, but for the first day out, pretty good!
Photoshopped
#505
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:24 AM
to foil
if wind is 10knots
sail on a broad reach
set foils so the red mark is flush with top of case
grind boards to 3? degrees
sit back and enjoy the ride
#506
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:28 AM
The boat looked bow up, stern down - but it was reasonably stable.
It looked good in not much breeze.
The board didn't snap in two and the cross beams are still intact so they've done better than the bigger-budget teams on their initial outing.
The week after next we may see the two boats go head-to-head.
#507
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:32 AM
Thks.They were using L boards - not the same as ETNZ.
Will TNZ let LR take the risk of using L boards in high wind ?
#508
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:52 AM
Thks.
They were using L boards - not the same as ETNZ.
Will TNZ let LR take the risk of using L boards in high wind ?
Hasn't LR's check cleared ?
#509
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:53 AM
Thks.
They were using L boards - not the same as ETNZ.
Will TNZ let LR take the risk of using L boards in high wind ?
why woudn't they?
they would have a lot to learn and nothing to lose
#510
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:57 AM
They were using L boards - not the same as ETNZ.
The boat looked bow up, stern down - but it was reasonably stable.
It looked good in not much breeze.
The board didn't snap in two and the cross beams are still intact so they've done better than the bigger-budget teams on their initial outing.
The week after next we may see the two boats go head-to-head.
great!
so if the L boards work here
can we assume that part of the reason is because they are LARGE L boards and not the small L boards that oracle thought were required?
in which case when we see 17.2, and 17.1, they are likely to have large L foils
possibly further back than they were on 17.1
#511
Posted 02 November 2012 - 04:06 AM
#512
Posted 02 November 2012 - 04:42 AM
lr and etnz will be far removed in terms of design soon. i was interested when i heard someone say on close up that tnz had been out in 32kts. damn
#513
Posted 02 November 2012 - 05:38 AM
The port foil looked different, if it was there at all, ie they might already have removed it. At first I thought it was a foil albeit much, much smaller than what we see on ETNZ and the starboard foil still in place on LR72 as above. It looked like an L shape. The protrusion above the deck was around a metre.
Looks like they had a very good day. Everyone was standing around very relaxed.
#514
Posted 02 November 2012 - 06:19 AM
the LR 'Ls' are fakes don't forget!
Haha thats gonna bite you in the arse
#515
Posted 02 November 2012 - 06:27 AM
the LR 'Ls' are fakes don't forget!
Haha thats gonna bite you in the arse
Remember you can tell the real ones from the fakes by the special paint.
#518
Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:31 AM
#519
Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:35 AM
Yeah that is weird - all the shots are with the port hull flying and no board... Either they didn't have one or they photoshopped it out to keep the suspense a little longer ??
No port side dagger board/foil?
#520
Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:41 AM
#521
Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:43 AM
dosent look fast...no wobble or uncontrolled twistYeah that is weird - all the shots are with the port hull flying and no board... Either they didn't have one or they photoshopped it out to keep the suspense a little longer ??
No port side dagger board/foil?
#522
Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:45 AM
Lots of wheelies and up/downs, but for the first day out, pretty good!
Photoshopped
Seems you were correct if they were sailing sans foils. Unless they were levitating.......
#523
Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:48 AM
From the borlenghi Facebook page looks they sailed without foil on both sides, only a test for the rudders?
i guess you see one foil.
#524
Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:48 AM
or etnz lent? them an experimental?
or just a day to set a baseline before fitting the foils
for brits
silver dream racer
#525
Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:54 AM
#526
Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:55 AM
#527
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:10 AM
perhaps the LR boys had their own foil they wanted to test
or etnz lent? them an experimental?
or just a day to set a baseline before fitting the foils
for brits
silver dream racer
Thanks for that Eric
How about Silver Dream Machine for LR
#528
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:14 AM
#529
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:19 AM
If you look at the photos on the facebook posting above no 11 and 14 you can see the smaller foil on the port hull..
i guess it is just a crane for foils.
but no foil in it.
#530
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:33 AM
#531
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:54 AM
who was an the steer?
anyone?
#533
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:01 AM
#534
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:05 AM
Attached Files
#535
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:28 AM
I thought it was Iker or Franck - not sure eitherit look like cammas posture but not sure
#536
Posted 02 November 2012 - 12:18 PM
#537
Posted 02 November 2012 - 12:40 PM
Dammit
JanetGannet, move
The Gannet would be good competition for an AC72 .. they can fly at 100 km/hr
#538
Posted 02 November 2012 - 12:57 PM
#539
Posted 02 November 2012 - 01:05 PM
I am pretty sure it's not Iker (too big and face doesn't look right behind the sunny's!)) and its not Chris Draper (he can clearly be seen on board). It isn't CJ. I think it is Franck, but it could be Max.I thought it was Iker or Franck - not sure either
it look like cammas posture but not sure
#540
Posted 02 November 2012 - 01:11 PM
He is a short and distinctive-looking man.
Attached Files
#541
Posted 02 November 2012 - 01:16 PM
#542
Posted 02 November 2012 - 01:27 PM
the LR 'Ls' are fakes don't forget!
Haha thats gonna bite you in the arse
Quite likely - but it's the Orklander's who reported them sailing with an 'L'/'Ls' yesterday.
I see one board with a straight vertical element and again it's 'reported' to have a straight element below - set at an unknown angle but probably greater than 90°??
Where were your cameras?
So they got up on the one foil (and rudder/s) right - or is that subject to dispute also?
https://www.facebook...&type=3(click em if you like em big)
Twist looks good




All photos © LUNA ROSSA /Carlo Borlenghi Protected by copyright
#543
Posted 02 November 2012 - 01:34 PM
At first I thought the pics where slightly photoshopped (hdr look), but also know that Borlenghi would never do that, this thing just looks awesome out of the box!
CB's staff (he's got a few of them) do a lot of post-production. But no professional has used Photoshop for years.
#544
Posted 02 November 2012 - 02:18 PM
The strange thing is they haven't revealed the real hulls yet, this paint is far too glossyRemember you can tell the real ones from the fakes by the special paint.
Anyway: ETNZ went out first couple of days with only the one board so its not overly surprising that LR will follow suit.
ETNZ was presumably hiding the Scythe foils until they were sure it worked OK so it is kind of surprising & interesting that LR would have something they feel is worthy of hiding after having been so open on their launch day
While it would be bad for ETNZs chances I like the possibility of cloak & dagger secret & unexpected by ETNZ development shenanigans from LR.
#545
Posted 02 November 2012 - 02:30 PM
#546
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:06 PM
#547
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:07 PM
#548
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:17 PM
Popped by on my way home. They were washing the hulls down very diligently before they put it on the cradle. The starboard foil was still in. I am not a cat sailor but I can say It was not an L shape. Rather the bottom of the L was curved upwards.
The port foil looked different, if it was there at all, ie they might already have removed it. At first I thought it was a foil albeit much, much smaller than what we see on ETNZ and the starboard foil still in place on LR72 as above. It looked like an L shape. The protrusion above the deck was around a metre.
Looks like they had a very good day. Everyone was standing around very relaxed.
https://www.facebook...98083670&type=1
Check these FB pictures, they sailed without a port dagger/foil....... Why????????
#549
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:22 PM
Photo 14 on the facebook series shows it clearly underneath the hull.
Dumbass, that is just the exit for the dagger/foil....
#550
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:50 PM
Foiling pics from the webcam here http://forums.sailin...00#entry3922677
Doesn't look like foiling to me. I see bow waves in all the pics. Can hardly see anything really, too low res.
#551
Posted 02 November 2012 - 05:24 PM
#552
Posted 02 November 2012 - 05:33 PM
Wish I could understand Italian, he is probably telling us all about how good it went.
#553
Posted 02 November 2012 - 05:56 PM
If I have my bearings right then by the shadow it would have been morning, probably waiting for the wind to pick up before heading out?
#554
Posted 02 November 2012 - 06:42 PM
#555
Posted 02 November 2012 - 07:21 PM
I am sure that video was not shot yesterday^ Sounded to me like he spoke about the accord with ETNZ, took a question about his role and who will helm, a few other things, wish I understood better too.
If I have my bearings right then by the shadow it would have been morning, probably waiting for the wind to pick up before heading out?
#556
Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:49 PM
At first I thought the pics where slightly photoshopped (hdr look), but also know that Borlenghi would never do that, this thing just looks awesome out of the box!
CB's staff (he's got a few of them) do a lot of post-production. But no professional has used Photoshop for years.
Been wondering about that too, HDR look also on some ETNZ pic, would love to know if some camera include an automatic HDR software correction or do some captors have a better dynamic range... (sorry for the hijack)
#557
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:09 PM
#558
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:20 PM
Re the photos: I also noted the HDR look of many of CCs shots. They look great. Yes some cameras do have built in HDR capability - his was more like a machine gun though, clak, clak, clak, clak!
#559
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:30 PM
Foiling pics from the webcam here http://forums.sailin...00#entry3922677
Doesn't look like foiling to me. I see bow waves in all the pics. Can hardly see anything really, too low res.
I watched it foil on the webcam. Definetely foiled. A bit arse heavy, (Like OR72), but lee bow up and foil clearly visible below it. Would have taken a still but my mouth was open. Foiling on day one! This happened on the last run before leaving the channel and then going into the harbour near the city for the main photos we see now. Claearly day one went well so they had a little play on the way home.
#560
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:31 PM
The chrome of the hull reflects light coming from behind the camera, I think that accounts for the HDR effect.
#562
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:42 PM
^^ The AC in Cinecitta.My excuses if it´s been published before
http://dja.dj/#/menu
#563
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:45 PM
My excuses if it´s been published before
http://dja.dj/#/menu
Sounds like CD doing the voice-over. This was the hollywood, water-cannon, studio thing right? edit: Or did they also get caught in the OTUSA17.1 rip current?
#564
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:46 PM
My excuses if it´s been published before
http://dja.dj/#/menu
Sounds like CD doing the voice-over. This was the hollywood, water-cannon, studio thing right?
Yes
#565
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:00 PM
Foiling pics from the webcam here http://forums.sailin...00#entry3922677
Doesn't look like foiling to me. I see bow waves in all the pics. Can hardly see anything really, too low res.
your call
mine is foiling
Screen Shot 2012-11-02 at 1.35.00 PM.png 66.8K
173 downloads
#566
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:13 PM
At first I thought the pics where slightly photoshopped (hdr look), but also know that Borlenghi would never do that, this thing just looks awesome out of the box!
If they're straight out of the camera then I think he's just used some heavy active d-lighting (or the Canon equivalent).
#567
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:20 PM
Foiling pics from the webcam here http://forums.sailin...00#entry3922677
Doesn't look like foiling to me. I see bow waves in all the pics. Can hardly see anything really, too low res.
your call
mine is foilingScreen Shot 2012-11-02 at 1.35.00 PM.png 66.8K 173 downloads
Still a tough call. It also looks like a ghost with a ponytail if you squint hard enough. I have no reason to doubt the locals who saw it, but why didnt the "best photographer in the world" Borlenghi get even one shot foiling?
#568
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:22 PM
He probably shot it, just not allowed to post it...yet!
Foiling pics from the webcam here http://forums.sailin...00#entry3922677
Doesn't look like foiling to me. I see bow waves in all the pics. Can hardly see anything really, too low res.
your call
mine is foilingScreen Shot 2012-11-02 at 1.35.00 PM.png 66.8K 173 downloads
Still a tough call. It also looks like a ghost with a ponytail if you squint hard enough. I have no reason to doubt the locals who saw it, but why didnt the "best photographer in the world" Borlenghi get even one shot foiling?
#569
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:32 PM
#570
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:35 PM
Thanks for the shot eric e. Seemingly foiling with light wind, and for their second sailing day only. Do we know how many kts of wind they had ?
first day!
#571
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:43 PM
What gives?
Edit: the wing has a black section I thought was the port board. Great pic
He probably shot it, just not allowed to post it...yet!
Foiling pics from the webcam here http://forums.sailin...00#entry3922677
Doesn't look like foiling to me. I see bow waves in all the pics. Can hardly see anything really, too low res.
your call
mine is foilingScreen Shot 2012-11-02 at 1.35.00 PM.png 66.8K 173 downloads
Still a tough call. It also looks like a ghost with a ponytail if you squint hard enough. I have no reason to doubt the locals who saw it, but why didnt the "best photographer in the world" Borlenghi get even one shot foiling?
#573
Posted 03 November 2012 - 12:33 AM
#574
Posted 03 November 2012 - 12:45 AM
Re that cam image, it's almost like that damn boat reflects itself, or even reflects its own water image. Crazy..
Anyone have experience with a Nikon 5100? Stingette wants (she thinks..) that for her birthday.
#575
Posted 03 November 2012 - 01:32 AM
Considered to be a good cam but not ideal for fast action (http://www.dpreview....ews/nikond5100/). If you have a bit more budget go for the d800 or, better, D4Anyone have experience with a Nikon 5100?
If you have Canon glass, go for the 5D mkIII or, (bigger budget) 1DX
#576
Posted 03 November 2012 - 01:57 AM
as well they could be considered the team to beat at present . The student becomes the teacher
#577
Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:29 AM
ThanksConsidered to be a good cam but not ideal for fast action (http://www.dpreview....ews/nikond5100/). If you have a bit more budget go for the d800 or, better, D4
Anyone have experience with a Nikon 5100?
If you have Canon glass, go for the 5D mkIII or, (bigger budget) 1DX
No expensive glass yet so the brand choice to start with is a factor for sure.
For taking shots of ladybugs on rose petals it all seems like overkill but it seems I am happiest when she is too.
#578
Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:40 AM
However think of what you want to have for the next AC, you could share some lenses (not the macro for you though). Nikon is now a bit cheaper than Canon.
Cameras are changing every year, therefore the key element is to invest in glass, and replace the cam every 3 years.
#579
Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:51 AM
The 5100 will do Iirc 4 FPS but a much faster FPS would definitely be cool for if she lets me use it too.
What is the camera CC used in the heli vid, does the XIFF image data specify?
#580
Posted 03 November 2012 - 03:34 AM
Just a rough look at the video suggests he had around $30K of gear with him for that flight - probably a bit more than you need for bugs in the backyard.
#581
Posted 03 November 2012 - 04:27 AM
Correct, it seems to be a D4 + teleIt looks and sounds like a Nikon D4 (without looking too closely).
Just a rough look at the video suggests he had around $30K of gear with him for that flight - probably a bit more than you need for bugs in the backyard.
#582
Posted 03 November 2012 - 04:33 AM
4 fps is OK, I don't think you need the 10 fps of the D4, even for 40 kts foiling cat.Like nav pointed out, Chris C at TNZ has a camera that sounds like a machine gun.
The 5100 will do Iirc 4 FPS but a much faster FPS would definitely be cool for if she lets me use it too.
What is the camera CC used in the heli vid, does the XIFF image data specify?
The main advantage of pro cam are to be waterproof and have good low ISO, which allows you to take pictures with long tele at fast speed, in order to get sharp pictures.
However the price tag is high.
The reasonable choice for you would be to take a Nikon 5100 for her, and a 70-200mm zoom for you.
#583
Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:54 AM
#584
Posted 03 November 2012 - 07:58 AM
Attached Files
#585
Posted 03 November 2012 - 09:31 AM
#586
Posted 03 November 2012 - 09:52 AM
In the video Chris has a D4($6K) with a 70-200vr2($2.4K) and a D3s/D3x($5.5-8K) with a 400vr ($9.5K).
[/camera anarchy]
#587
Posted 03 November 2012 - 09:57 AM
Up on foil
Great pic. How long before the ORites claim is photoshopped?
#588
Posted 03 November 2012 - 10:01 AM
Looks like straight foils to me!!Up on foil
#589
Posted 03 November 2012 - 10:45 AM
The maximum FPS also depends on what type of memory you use, faster memory means less time neede between shots.The 5100 will do Iirc 4 FPS but a much faster FPS would definitely be cool for if she lets me use it too.
Remember that an expensive camera is no gaurantee for good pictures, take some lessons, read some books, and take lots of pictures to get better.
[/camera anarchy]
Anyway, I think our friends at LR have found a small "loophole" in the rules.
The rules talk about being allowed 10 sets of boards but doesnt say they have to be 5 pairs.
I think LR have rightly realized that this AC all boils down to foils, and they will not waste a single one of the 10 they are allowed to build.
When the LVC starts they will have the right boards + a spare set, which leaves just them which six opportunities to get it right, in the meantime they will sail upwind like a three legged pig
29.7. Daggerboard Limits
Each Competitor may build, acquire or otherwise obtain a maximum of ten AC72 Yacht Daggerboards,
provided:
(a) a Daggerboard is only included in this limit after it is first installed on any yacht; and
(a Daggerboard shall be deemed to be a new if more than 30% of its mass is replaced.
#590
Posted 03 November 2012 - 10:49 AM
I think you are right!The maximum FPS also depends on what type of memory you use, faster memory means less time neede between shots.
The 5100 will do Iirc 4 FPS but a much faster FPS would definitely be cool for if she lets me use it too.
Remember that an expensive camera is no gaurantee for good pictures, take some lessons, read some books, and take lots of pictures to get better.
[/camera anarchy]
Anyway, I think our friends at LR have found a small "loophole" in the rules.
The rules talk about being allowed 10 sets of boards but doesnt say they have to be 5 pairs.
I think LR have rightly realized that this AC all boils down to foils, and they will not waste a single one of the 10 they are allowed to build.
When the LVC starts they will have the right boards + a spare set, which leaves just them which six opportunities to get it right, in the meantime they will sail upwind like a three legged pig29.7. Daggerboard Limits
Each Competitor may build, acquire or otherwise obtain a maximum of ten AC72 Yacht Daggerboards,
provided:
(a) a Daggerboard is only included in this limit after it is first installed on any yacht; and
(a Daggerboard shall be deemed to be a new if more than 30% of its mass is replaced.
Good spotting
#591
Posted 03 November 2012 - 11:38 AM
Don't see a hole in the water like on the ETNZ pic. The future?Up on foil
#592
Posted 03 November 2012 - 11:42 AM
There is no surprise in this & LR wouldn't be the first team out with different foils in each hull eg Oracle when it capsized & ETNZ has different rudders on in the latest aerial shots.Anyway, I think our friends at LR have found a small "loophole" in the rules.
The rules talk about being allowed 10 sets of boards but doesnt say they have to be 5 pairs.
#593
Posted 03 November 2012 - 01:46 PM
There is no surprise in this & LR wouldn't be the first team out with different foils in each hull eg Oracle when it capsized & ETNZ has different rudders on in the latest aerial shots.Anyway, I think our friends at LR have found a small "loophole" in the rules.
The rules talk about being allowed 10 sets of boards but doesnt say they have to be 5 pairs.
There appeared to be only one of each of the SL33 trial foils as well.
The fact that OTU17.1 had two different boards was not through a clever choice!
If the boards take anything like as long to produce as OTU would have us believe you would be crazy to produce two to test one - even without the 10 foil max restriction.
I made this point and the similar one that applies to the max number of spar tubes halves - in theory they need not be 'paired' either.
I looked at the ETNZ aerial shots again but don't see what you are with regard to the rudders. Can you post the right shots? (Shame they always stay the right way up - making it so difficult to see the foils)
They are not travelling at correct ploughing speed, so no properly turned sod!
But if hole = stability, quickness to foil, ease of control, faster manoeuvres and less time required between manoeuvres (and assuming any truly excess drag will be removed incrementally with each new foil) which of these features would you give away?
#594
Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:03 PM
What a slap on the face for AR and OR.
America's Cup: Luna Rossa foils on Day 1 - with single foil
Luna Rossa Challenge were able to get their AC72 foiling on their first day of sailing on the Hauraki Gulf on Friday (NZT)
It was the first day of sailing for the Italian America's Cup Challenger starting in light winds which slowly increased top around 15 knots.
The AC72 sailed with only one foil, which was a little limiting however from an image from a team member's Facebook page it would seem that Luna Rossa were able to get foiling - an impressive feat in the circumstances. Other teams have been able to foil on their fourth day of sailing, which has become a benchmark.
To hear an interview with Luna Rossa's Matteo Plazzi and Newstalk ZB's Peter Montgomery click here and the interview starts at 10.30 the second part can be heard by clicking here
by Richard Gladwell
http://www.sail-worl...gle-foil/103466
#595
Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:32 PM
#596
Posted 03 November 2012 - 03:19 PM
Has anyone compared the LR foil to the one ETNZ was christened with?
#597
Posted 03 November 2012 - 03:48 PM
Amazing,..... on the first day, seemingly on T foils and with light wind. Anybody can tell is the flight was stable ?
What a slap on the face for AR and OR.
America's Cup: Luna Rossa foils on Day 1 - with single foil
'Luna Rossa’s AC72 foiling on Friday November 2, 2012 - with only one daggerboard installed' Luna Rossa Challenge 2013 Click Here to view large photo
Luna Rossa Challenge were able to get their AC72 foiling on their first day of sailing on the Hauraki Gulf on Friday (NZT)
It was the first day of sailing for the Italian America's Cup Challenger starting in light winds which slowly increased top around 15 knots.
The AC72 sailed with only one foil, which was a little limiting however from an image from a team member's Facebook page it would seem that Luna Rossa were able to get foiling - an impressive feat in the circumstances. Other teams have been able to foil on their fourth day of sailing, which has become a benchmark.
To hear an interview with Luna Rossa's Matteo Plazzi and Newstalk ZB's Peter Montgomery click here and the interview starts at 10.30 the second part can be heard by clicking here
by Richard Gladwell
http://www.sail-worl...gle-foil/103466
Clearly photoshopped. There is no hole.
#598
Posted 03 November 2012 - 04:48 PM
Told you it wouldn't be long before the first ORite came along!
Amazing,..... on the first day, seemingly on T foils and with light wind. Anybody can tell is the flight was stable ?
What a slap on the face for AR and OR.
America's Cup: Luna Rossa foils on Day 1 - with single foil
'Luna Rossa’s AC72 foiling on Friday November 2, 2012 - with only one daggerboard installed' Luna Rossa Challenge 2013 Click Here to view large photo
Luna Rossa Challenge were able to get their AC72 foiling on their first day of sailing on the Hauraki Gulf on Friday (NZT)
It was the first day of sailing for the Italian America's Cup Challenger starting in light winds which slowly increased top around 15 knots.
The AC72 sailed with only one foil, which was a little limiting however from an image from a team member's Facebook page it would seem that Luna Rossa were able to get foiling - an impressive feat in the circumstances. Other teams have been able to foil on their fourth day of sailing, which has become a benchmark.
To hear an interview with Luna Rossa's Matteo Plazzi and Newstalk ZB's Peter Montgomery click here and the interview starts at 10.30 the second part can be heard by clicking here
by Richard Gladwell
http://www.sail-worl...gle-foil/103466
Clearly photoshopped. There is no hole.
#599
Posted 03 November 2012 - 05:00 PM
how long till TNZ launches their 3rd (LR-2) ??
Last boat to be built will be TNZ-4
DRILL som holes and let's get to the bottom of things
#600
Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:07 PM
13 user(s) are reading this topic
6 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users














