Can't be too long before this sock gets bounced just like the last one.
Scooter's given him one warning, and he continues to be a twat. Time's up.
Posted 16 March 2013 - 10:03 PM
Can't be too long before this sock gets bounced just like the last one.
Posted 16 March 2013 - 10:06 PM
Posted 16 March 2013 - 10:10 PM
Is this thread about a boat or a twat?
Twice I've asked a simple question and everyone keeps talking about the twat. Well its getting the attention it wants.
Posted 16 March 2013 - 10:11 PM
Ignorance, racism and poor spelling will get me going every timeMad:
Makes one wonder what it takes to become some an angry, bitter little man.
Posted 16 March 2013 - 10:16 PM
Posted 16 March 2013 - 10:17 PM
Google "ad hominem".Is this thread about a boat or a twat?
Twice I've asked a simple question and everyone keeps talking about the twat. Well its getting the attention it wants.
Posted 16 March 2013 - 11:11 PM
Posted 16 March 2013 - 11:16 PM
Nah. Keels bury rather quickly in sand with a little wave action.Anyone want to guess if the keel is buried in the sand or fallen off?
Looks like to me in that pick that it could not have a keel.
Posted 17 March 2013 - 12:40 AM
Posted 17 March 2013 - 12:54 AM
Posted 17 March 2013 - 01:30 AM
Posted 17 March 2013 - 02:17 AM
Mad:
Makes one wonder what it takes to become an angry, bitter little man.
Posted 17 March 2013 - 02:18 AM
Posted 17 March 2013 - 02:31 AM
Posted 17 March 2013 - 03:33 AM
Is this thread about a boat or a twat?
Twice I've asked a simple question and everyone keeps talking about the twat. Well its getting the attention it wants.
In response, I'd guess it still has a keel because it's right side up. It may be a very short wing keel, in which case it's now a giant Bruce anchor.
Nah. Keels bury rather quickly in sand with a little wave action.
Anyone want to guess if the keel is buried in the sand or fallen off?
Looks like to me in that pick that it could not have a keel.
I think the keel is in the sand and looks like part of the rig over the Stb side so it may have only come down as she came ashore.
Posted 17 March 2013 - 09:09 AM
No idea, but lifes too frikken short to through it like that.Mad:
Makes one wonder what it takes to become an angry, bitter little man.
Posted 09 April 2013 - 01:44 AM
Sockpuppet's spleen and bile aside, one of his points is, I think, interesting:
While it is terribly unfortunate that mistakes in judgement and / or circumstances (beyond their control) forced the owners of the yacht to make the decision to abandon ship, emotions aside, should they be held responsible for the cost of cleaning up the physical mess resulting from that decision?
Posted 09 April 2013 - 01:47 AM
One of the reasons I ask the above question is that I have never been entirely comfortable with the quite common "choice" to go uninsured... because this seems like a good example whereby if you aren't insured, the loss is not just yours (in the loss of your boat), but also incurred by whoever has to clean up the mess because you can't afford to... and that doesn't sit well with me.
Posted 09 April 2013 - 02:25 AM
One of the reasons I ask the above question is that I have never been entirely comfortable with the quite common "choice" to go uninsured... because this seems like a good example whereby if you aren't insured, the loss is not just yours (in the loss of your boat), but also incurred by whoever has to clean up the mess because you can't afford to... and that doesn't sit well with me.
Is environmental clean up included in 3rd party policies?
Posted 09 April 2013 - 02:38 AM
No idea, but not sure if these guys (and certainly not others I know) had 3rd party. There are so many arguments about the rights and wrongs of insurance / self-insurance / no insurance / 3rd party (especially on that other forum for cruisers, but this case seems to illustrate why at least some insurance is the responsible way to go.
Posted 09 April 2013 - 04:18 AM
holy shit, are those EPIRBs still transmitting?
Posted 11 April 2013 - 03:55 AM
OK, I'll stir the pot. What ever happened to self reliance? (Hey, I love life as much as the next guy - I too would activate the EPIRB, as I stepped up into the life raft). So I ask this question: should anyone put to sea on an ocean passage without a fit-for-purpose boat, enough spares, knowledge, food, water, and determination to make it to shore again in their own vessel? Many of the great cruising sailors of the past generation endured crises that required, jury-rigging, hardship and persistence to make it home...have we become a bunch of wimps?
As a general rule, the answer to your question is "yes". I will repeat though, this is the general rule. I know a few cruising sailors who are absolutely self-reliant, and don't consider calling for help an option, only a necessity. Personally, I was upside down a few years ago between Tonga and New Zealand on a singlehanded passage. Thankfully the rig stayed up, but I took on a whole lot of water, and lost my radios, radar, and GPS. Epirb was in great shape, but I was floating, the rig was up, I had food and water, didn't seem to be an emergency to me. Medical emergencies aside, I have little respect for sailors who call for rescue from a floating vessel. Some people don't belong offshore.
I am sure the fishermen will be fine, they are a truly self-reliant sort. As for the sailors, I do hope the best for them, and that they make it home ok. I also hope the learn all appropriate lessons from their experience; Storm preperation, storm tactics, emergency plans of action, and so forth.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users