You gotta scroll down the page about half way.
Not Page 3
Posted 10 November 2012 - 01:10 PM
Posted 11 November 2012 - 01:21 AM
Posted 12 November 2012 - 12:04 AM
Posted 12 November 2012 - 10:41 PM

Posted 12 November 2012 - 10:45 PM
Posted 12 November 2012 - 10:48 PM
the count is now up to 250 readers and not one of your so called good and close friends have had anything to say on your behalf. how sad.
Posted 14 November 2012 - 04:26 AM
Posted 14 November 2012 - 04:43 AM
Posted 14 November 2012 - 04:49 AM
Posted 14 November 2012 - 09:29 AM
Posted 14 November 2012 - 09:50 AM
fuck off George Hackett
Posted 14 November 2012 - 10:21 AM
Posted 14 November 2012 - 09:28 PM
so let's recap here. of all the threads going on here, life bouy opens this one to tell us he is not interested. ok? and like life bouy, gybe set and all the other Brigaders have to hide thier identities. come on. be real men and tell us who you truly are.
Posted 14 November 2012 - 09:44 PM
Posted 14 November 2012 - 10:02 PM
Kent, you must be Mark, for sure, Kent, hi Mark, or Kent, or ...Some guy on literally the other side of the planet is a pedo.
OK - we got that about 20,000 posts ago
If he shows up at my club we'll get the popo to haul him off, but other than that......................
Posted 15 November 2012 - 01:44 AM
so let's recap here. of all the threads going on here, life bouy opens this one to tell us he is not interested. ok? and like life bouy, gybe set and all the other Brigaders have to hide thier identities. come on. be real men and tell us who you truly are.
Posted 15 November 2012 - 08:45 AM
Posted 15 November 2012 - 02:55 PM
Posted 15 November 2012 - 10:17 PM
i am still waiting for someone with the balls to stand up and state their name proudly in support/defence of mark hazwell.
Posted 15 November 2012 - 10:19 PM
It is unfortunate Mr. Hackett, that those who will defend such actions are plentiful, and many are sufficiently confident, or perhaps arrogant, to put their names to such defence.
Take for example this rather strange if not shameful item which appeared in the Financial Times last Friday. Perhaps a more appropriate headline would have been "In Defense of Paedophiles".
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/65285bb0-299a-11e2-a5ca-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2CH7iOSpc
Surprisingly, this article is written by Contributing Editor Max Hastings an otherwise respected British author, historian and journalist. I am unsure as to Mr. Hastings motive when comparing child abuse to burglary, other than tarnishing the author as a paedophile apologist, but he continues;
"The public obsession with paedophilia now obliges art galleries and auctioneers to exercise extreme care in marketing images of children," and he goes on to state; "Many honourable and admirable people who work with the young must exercise elaborate care to avoid casual physical contact with their charges."
Such a statement is nothing short of extraordinary in view of the fact that it is the failure by a significant number of people in authority to exercise due care, which goes to the very heart of the scandals in which both Penn State and the BBC now find themselves embroiled.
Posted 15 November 2012 - 11:03 PM
It is unfortunate Mr. Hackett, that those who will defend such actions are plentiful, and many are sufficiently confident, or perhaps arrogant, to put their names to such defence.
Take for example this rather strange if not shameful item which appeared in the Financial Times last Friday. Perhaps a more appropriate headline would have been "In Defense of Paedophiles".
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/65285bb0-299a-11e2-a5ca-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2CH7iOSpc
Surprisingly, this article is written by Contributing Editor Max Hastings an otherwise respected British author, historian and journalist. I am unsure as to Mr. Hastings motive when comparing child abuse to burglary, other than tarnishing the author as a paedophile apologist, but he continues;
"The public obsession with paedophilia now obliges art galleries and auctioneers to exercise extreme care in marketing images of children," and he goes on to state; "Many honourable and admirable people who work with the young must exercise elaborate care to avoid casual physical contact with their charges."
Such a statement is nothing short of extraordinary in view of the fact that it is the failure by a significant number of people in authority to exercise due care, which goes to the very heart of the scandals in which both Penn State and the BBC now find themselves embroiled.
Why do Lawyers post in serif font?
Posted 16 November 2012 - 01:13 AM
i am still waiting for someone with the balls to stand up and state their name proudly in support/defence of mark hazwell.
Get comfortable Georgie, you will have a long wait. Because no one posting here gives a flying fuck about this Hazwell creep.
Get it? As I have said in the past if you want to catch the cunt then your time would be better spent seaching in places you havn't looked. Over and over and over and over again.
Have you looked up your own arse?
Posted 16 November 2012 - 04:10 AM
Posted 16 November 2012 - 04:21 AM
Posted 26 November 2012 - 02:49 AM
here is a sample of the Mark Brigade's spin on the aleged rape of a minor.
Members have strongly denied allegations they were well aware as early as 2002 of persistent rumours about their founder and chairman Mark Haswell of being morbidly obese.
Critics have pointed out that despite ordering a discreet investigation, senior foundation members failed to quiz Haswell about his enormous girth and seemed more concerned with whether their sponsors would notice that he was grossly overweight.
The Mark Brigade however, vehemently denies “turning a blind eye” to more serious allegations as they emerged, insisting it can find “no record” of Haswell ever being accused of obesity or wearing a girdle while he was Chairman.
One former senior Foundation member explained:
“Sure we all knew he was a lard ass, but it’s stretching things to suggest we would have let him continue to be in close contact with impressionable young people if we had known he was dangerously obese”.
Despite these denials, many people are now wondering just how it could be possible, that so many people could have been unaware of Haswell’s morbid obesity, despite his evident openness about it.
For their part, a spokesman has denied the reason for their blind support of Haswell, and their evident failure to follow up allegations of his obesity, was because certain members were concerned about evidence emerging that they too may be overweight.
Posted 28 November 2012 - 02:47 AM
Posted 29 November 2012 - 01:57 AM
here is a sample of the Mark Brigade's spin on the aleged rape of a minor.
Members have strongly denied allegations they were well aware as early as 2002 of persistent rumours about their founder and chairman Mark Haswell of being morbidly obese.
Critics have pointed out that despite ordering a discreet investigation, senior foundation members failed to quiz Haswell about his enormous girth and seemed more concerned with whether their sponsors would notice that he was grossly overweight.
The Mark Brigade however, vehemently denies “turning a blind eye” to more serious allegations as they emerged, insisting it can find “no record” of Haswell ever being accused of obesity or wearing a girdle while he was Chairman.
One former senior Foundation member explained:
“Sure we all knew he was a lard ass, but it’s stretching things to suggest we would have let him continue to be in close contact with impressionable young people if we had known he was dangerously obese”.
Despite these denials, many people are now wondering just how it could be possible, that so many people could have been unaware of Haswell’s morbid obesity, despite his evident openness about it.
For their part, a spokesman has denied the reason for their blind support of Haswell, and their evident failure to follow up allegations of his obesity, was because certain members were concerned about evidence emerging that they too may be overweight.
c'mon george how's about a proper apology to some of the guys you've dissed on here?
here's a draft
An apology to SAGS and Mark Haswell
In numerous posts on SA, I’ve made a number of defamatory statements about SAGS and one of its members Mark Haswell.
I now acknowledge that there's no truth to the statements I made on SA that SAGS are a group of Sailors who welcomed into their midst, a paedophile and fugitive or have in the past been friendly and supportive of a paedophile fugitive.
I unreservedly and sincerely apologise to SAGS for any suggestions I may have made on SA that they are by any stretch of the imagination Sailors when they clearly wouldn't know spinnaker if it were bright pink and emblazoned with the words "I'm a spinnaker, come on baby, you know you want me" - I’m sorry for any inconvenience and damage which these untrue statements posted on SA may have caused.
I am also happy to correct the assertions I made on SA that Mark Haswell is a Sailor who preys on young children for his sexual gratification:
I unreservedly and sincerely apologise to Mark Haswell for any suggestion I may have made that he is or ever has been a real Sailor and I am sorry for any inconvenience and damage which this untrue statement on SA may have caused.
I would also like to add that if I unwittingly gave the impression that Mark Haswell is in any way morbidly obese, I unreservedly apologise for that too.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users