Hail ports
#1
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:27 AM
There probably isn't more than one Virginia Beach, and it's most likely in Virginia. I think the rules say the state should be on the transom, but many don't do this.
My attitude is if the place is unique without the state, then including the state just mucks up the transom needlessly. "Newport" needs a state, but "Nantucket," others don't.
Another question, should a hail port be on the water, necessarily?
#2
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:38 AM
#3
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:40 AM
http://www.ecfr.gov/...3.8.1.4&idno=46
#4
Posted 13 November 2012 - 01:32 AM
Race boats from about 20 years ago
Amazing Potato, Boise, ID
High Noon, Tombstone, AZ. (Sail number USA 1200)
#5
Posted 13 November 2012 - 02:30 AM
#6
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:18 PM
Flagged vessels (Documented) require a hailing port but no requirement that it actually be a port.
#7
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:38 PM
Not on the water,
Race boats from about 20 years ago
Amazing Potato, Boise, ID
High Noon, Tombstone, AZ. (Sail number USA 1200)
That always brought a smile....
#8
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:39 PM
#9
Posted 13 November 2012 - 01:11 PM
I believe the coast guard rules allow any "federally recognized place," and there is a list. This allows using a village like "Padanaram" instead of a town. We have many villages in New England. The place can bear any relationship to the boat owner, including none. The state is supposed to be included.
Correct. CFR section 67.119
§ 67.119 Hailing port designation.
(a) Upon application for any Certificate of Documentation in accordance with subpart K of this part, the owner of a vessel must designate a hailing port to be marked upon the vessel.
(
© The hailing port must include the State, territory, or possession in which it is located.
(d) The Director, National Vessel Documentation Center has final authority to settle disputes as to the propriety of the hailing port designated.
(e) Until such time as the vessel owner elects to designate a new hailing port, the provisions of paragraph © of this section do not apply to vessels which were issued a Certificate of Documentation before July 1, 1982.
[CGD 89-007, CGD 89-007a, 58 FR 60266, Nov. 15, 1993, as amended by CGD 95-014, 60 FR 31604, June 15, 1995; USCG-1998-4442, 63 FR 52191, Sept. 30, 1998]
#10
Posted 13 November 2012 - 03:14 PM
If I could it would be "Lake of the Coheeries"
#11
Posted 13 November 2012 - 04:53 PM
#12
Posted 13 November 2012 - 05:10 PM
Not on the water,
Race boats from about 20 years ago
Amazing Potato, Boise, ID
High Noon, Tombstone, AZ. (Sail number USA 1200)
That always brought a smile....
High Noon's sistership later in life was After Midnight, USA 2400. I don't recall the hailing port.
#13
Posted 13 November 2012 - 07:14 PM
#14
Posted 13 November 2012 - 09:17 PM
#15
Posted 13 November 2012 - 10:25 PM
I believe the reg is also that the hailing port be at least in 4 inch high letters... not that anyone conforms to that.
#16
Posted 13 November 2012 - 10:27 PM
We had Montana on one of the boats for a while. Flathead Lake is big enough for the boat, even if it never left CT.
I believe the reg is also that the hailing port be at least in 4 inch high letters... not that anyone conforms to that.
Correct - for a documented vessel. Non documented can be any size or font.
And you are right. Few sailboats comply.
#17
Posted 13 November 2012 - 10:50 PM
We had Montana on one of the boats for a while. Flathead Lake is big enough for the boat, even if it never left CT.
I believe the reg is also that the hailing port be at least in 4 inch high letters... not that anyone conforms to that.
Some of us didn't have the room!!
Attached Files
#18
Posted 13 November 2012 - 11:52 PM
#19
Posted 01 December 2012 - 06:44 AM
KILLER BEE
San Diego
#20
Posted 01 December 2012 - 01:02 PM
When we bought our boat, we were sailing out of Stingray Point which I think makes for a great, salty hailing port. However, the requirement for 4" letters and the limited transom space helped us decide to use our hometown which was shorter but we still had to cheat on letter size.
#21
Posted 06 December 2012 - 04:02 AM
I believe Larry Ellison's boats are mostly registered in Woodside CA.
#22
Posted 06 December 2012 - 05:44 PM
Canadian regs just require the port, no requirement to mark province. So mine is just "Halifax".
Our's is "Lunenburg"
#23
Posted 07 December 2012 - 01:56 AM
Canadian regs just require the port, no requirement to mark province. So mine is just "Halifax".
In Canada there are designated "Ports of Registry". You have to use one of those as your hailing port if your boat is registered (same thing as documented in the USA).
The accepted Ports of Registry are (by Province):
Newfoundland-
and-Labrador
- St. John's
- Charlottetown
- Digby
- Halifax
- Liverpool
- Lunenburg
- Port Hawkesbury
- Shelburne
- Sydney
- Weymouth
- Yarmouth
- Bathurst
- Caraquet
- Grand Manan
- Moncton
- St. Andrews
- Saint John
- Montreal
- Sorel
- Cap-aux-Meules
- Chicoutimi
- Gaspé
- Québec
- Trois-Rivières
- Toronto
- Belleville
- Brockville
- Chatham
- Cornwall
- Goderich
- Hamilton
- Kenora
- Kingston
- Midland
- Nanticoke (Port Dover)
- Ottawa
- Owen Sound
- Peterborough
- Port Colborne
- Prescott
- St.Catharines
- Sarnia
- Sault Ste-Marie
- Thunder Bay
- Wallaceburg
- Windsor
- Winnipeg
British Columbia
- Vancouver
- New Westminster
- Victoria
- Nanaimo
- Port Alberni
- Prince Rupert
- Edmonton
- Prince Albert
- Dawson
- Iqaluit
- Hay River
- Yellowknife
- Whitehorse
#24
Posted 10 December 2012 - 03:51 PM
Ted Turner for a while used "Earth" as his hail port while and IIRC Bill Zeigler's boat(s) Gem hailed from "Wyoming" just Wyoming.Not on the water,
Race boats from about 20 years ago
Amazing Potato, Boise, ID
High Noon, Tombstone, AZ. (Sail number USA 1200)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













