XP 33 launched, first trial pics!
#1
Posted 22 November 2012 - 04:52 PM
#2
Posted 22 November 2012 - 10:20 PM
#3
Posted 22 November 2012 - 10:57 PM
#4
Posted 23 November 2012 - 03:34 AM
#5
Posted 23 November 2012 - 08:37 AM
#6
Posted 23 November 2012 - 10:03 AM
#7
Posted 23 November 2012 - 02:50 PM
http://www.x-yachts.com/seeems/145995.asp?retUrl=javascript:_w.history.back%28%29&lp106905=0
and the written report:
http://www.x-yachts....s.asp?id=137557
interesting interior shots; maybe the most basic/Spartan X 'Yacht' in a long time, or ever. I agree that this fits in roughly the same bucket as a 105 or the new C&C 101, but with the unquestionable build quality of X Yachts. Looks like a nice boat.
#8
Posted 23 November 2012 - 03:07 PM
#9
Posted 23 November 2012 - 06:26 PM
#10
Posted 23 November 2012 - 06:41 PM
.....how is it that this boat which uses carbon in it's build is 1000lbs heavier than a J33 which was designed 25yrs earlier?
#11
Posted 23 November 2012 - 07:59 PM
Don't get me wrong, this boat w/sprit, tiller, block 'n tackle backstay has huge drool factor for me, but.......
.....how is it that this boat which uses carbon in it's build is 1000lbs heavier than a J33 which was designed 25yrs earlier?
I happened to check out the flex stiffness of an X-35 keel with that of a JBoat...and yes, I can figure out why
#12
Posted 25 November 2012 - 11:24 AM
#13
Posted 25 November 2012 - 01:04 PM
it would be interesting to see the $$ difference between this boat and the rest of the segement... how much more would the market pay for, the best construction, performance and maybe rating?
But then you would have to call it a J boat. LOL
#14
Posted 25 November 2012 - 01:17 PM
Don't get me wrong, this boat w/sprit, tiller, block 'n tackle backstay has huge drool factor for me, but.......
.....how is it that this boat which uses carbon in it's build is 1000lbs heavier than a J33 which was designed 25yrs earlier?
The Xp line of boats from X-Yachts are meant to be performance cruiser-racers that can do well under IRC - that's their design brief.
Not only does iRC want a moderately heavy boat in that size range..., but it's also what their customers want for cruising.
Probably half the boats they build spend most of their lives in the Baltic Sea, and the North Sea. I think the customers there know a thing or two about sailboats, and X-Yachts are something sailors there aspire to own.
If you look at the boats that the Xp line are replacing, you will see that they are basically cruising boats that can be raced. If anything, The Xp line is somewhat higher in performance than what they replace - the composite grid gives a lower VCG than the steel grid, and the added beam aft gives more power.
compare, for example, the new Xp-44 with the X-43 which it replaces.
These boats - the Xp line - are not even in their "Race" line of boats. Even that line, which comprises the X-35 and the X-41, are not particularly light - probably in part because of the wish to compete under IRC in addition to one-design.
#15
Posted 25 November 2012 - 09:39 PM
#16
Posted 26 November 2012 - 03:16 AM
#17
Posted 26 November 2012 - 03:39 AM
Put.
Why don't you stick to your specialty of aiming your insulting and idiotic comments at people you haven't met... instead of at guys who have been nothing but decent to you.
Congrats, you've done it again
#18
Posted 26 November 2012 - 04:27 AM
Put.
Why don't you stick to your specialty of aiming your insulting and idiotic comments at people you haven't met... instead of at guys who have been nothing but decent to you.
Congrats, you've done it again
Or I could just be trying to make a joke with a friend who loves sporty X-Yachts. How does that make me the asshole?
http://forums.sailin...8Wow. A sprit on an X-Yacht. Last trip to Denmark in 2005 I respectfully submitted that might be a good idea.
So when the Xp39 with sprit emerges, I get to be X-X-X Yachter.
#19
Posted 26 November 2012 - 07:23 AM
Looks useful
Usefull for what?
#20
Posted 26 November 2012 - 08:29 AM
#21
Posted 26 November 2012 - 09:14 AM
[the composite grid gives a lower VCG than the steel grid
How would it do that? VCG on the Xp line is very close to the waterline, thus the grid is below VCG. Reducing weight there gives higher VCG not lower.
#22
Posted 26 November 2012 - 10:29 AM
[the composite grid gives a lower VCG than the steel grid
How would it do that? VCG on the Xp line is very close to the waterline, thus the grid is below VCG. Reducing weight there gives higher VCG not lower.
If the saved wheigt goes into the bulb?
#23
Posted 01 December 2012 - 04:20 AM
#24
Posted 01 December 2012 - 04:49 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












