Where is the Fox News - Petraus - Allies thread
#1
Posted 05 December 2012 - 03:27 AM
Wow....
http://www.washingto...9fd5_story.html
#2
Posted 05 December 2012 - 03:48 AM
I'm sure Chris Mathews will have a comment as soon as he can release Obama's cock from his mouth.
#3
Posted 05 December 2012 - 04:20 AM
#4
Posted 05 December 2012 - 11:43 AM
Looks like the Republicans missed out on their very own president who gets blow jobs in the oval office. But don't worry, I bet more will be along shortly.
Yep, now that Petraeus is no longer useful, he must be destroyed. The greatly increased body count as we are driven out of Afghanistan under Obama needs someone to blame.
#5
Posted 05 December 2012 - 11:53 AM
#6
Posted 05 December 2012 - 03:50 PM
You have to adjust your outrage meter. Which of these things is not like the other...was on Sesame Street. You seem to have missed that particular episode.
#7
Posted 05 December 2012 - 06:44 PM
#8
Posted 05 December 2012 - 07:03 PM
Am I missing something? This is possibly one of the biggest stories of our day...a sitting general wined and dined by a media conglomerate and told to QUIT from the war he was in charge of and run against Obama...with the SUPPORT of the Network President?? Same networks makes their "expert" praise him as a setup to it?
Wow....
http://www.washingto...9fd5_story.html
Our colleagues have raised some interesting and difficult questions about Congress’ authority to regulate electioneering by the press, and about how to define what constitutes the press.
#9
Posted 06 December 2012 - 12:47 AM
#10
Posted 06 December 2012 - 12:49 AM
I see no mention of regulation, only an appearance of impropriety.
There is more to that opinion than the one sentence. I have read it and can summarize for those who do not: The need for regulation is justified by... wait for it... impropriety AND the appearance of same.
#11
Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:02 AM
I see no mention of regulation, only an appearance of impropriety.
There is more to that opinion than the one sentence. I have read it and can summarize for those who do not: The need for regulation is justified by... wait for it... impropriety AND the appearance of same.
Where exactly is that in the Washington Post article or this thread? I have read both and can answer that for those with difficulties relating to subjects outside their OCD: it isn't.
Definitely another Favre moment
#12
Posted 06 December 2012 - 02:27 AM
The logic is clear. Fox and their allies are pro-2nd Amendment remedies and Obama is not. Therefore.......all this BS about Fox trying to create and own the government is just.....BS.
#13
Posted 06 December 2012 - 02:38 AM
Likely both are somewhat true.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












