Jump to content


New Cubed - First Supermaxi Since Speedboat

jim clark vplp supermaxi verdier record breaker offshore

  • Please log in to reply
2858 replies to this topic

#2801 bigrpowr

bigrpowr

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 856 posts
  • Location:moorpark
  • Interests:big horsepower

Posted 18 December 2015 - 04:02 AM

 

 

Dropped in for a visit, not much has changed and certainly none for the better.
 
A comment on this project. Given perfect conditions it could blitz the record, most years it would not make Hobart, on a bad year people will die.
 
I know Volvo boats handle extreme weather but they always have the option to head down and change strategy.
 
Heading to Hobart, 50knots plus on the nose, Bass Straight no back to them 10+ meter waves with a cross sea at 3 meters. This is a death ship.

STH is not the race for this boat IMHO. Especially not as a shake down.



Just my 2c, flame away.

 
It's basically a big Open 60, Paps, designed to break transatlantic, transpacific, and even possibly a RTW record.  And perhaps most importantly, there was no JuanK involvement.
 
Do you think it should be able to handle a Hobart with those credentials?

So what changed your mind from last year?

 

meth .



#2802 huey 2

huey 2

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 322 posts
  • Location:syd
  • Interests:yes

Posted 19 December 2015 - 12:07 AM

Structure-going-in-150x150.jpg10550881_686704461384231_512895408911678DSC04076-1280x960-150x150.jpg



#2803 Terrafirma

Terrafirma

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,121 posts

Posted 22 December 2015 - 12:38 PM

Transatlantic Speed Record and a preview of whats to come for Comanche in the Hobart.! 

 



#2804 Outlaw Country!

Outlaw Country!

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 712 posts

Posted 22 December 2015 - 04:40 PM

stop_penis_erect_archer.gif

#2805 MR.CLEAN

MR.CLEAN

    Anarchist

  • Reporters
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 36,508 posts
  • Location:Everywhere you want to be
  • Interests:.

Posted 22 December 2015 - 08:19 PM

 

 

Dropped in for a visit, not much has changed and certainly none for the better.
 
A comment on this project. Given perfect conditions it could blitz the record, most years it would not make Hobart, on a bad year people will die.
 
I know Volvo boats handle extreme weather but they always have the option to head down and change strategy.
 
Heading to Hobart, 50knots plus on the nose, Bass Straight no back to them 10+ meter waves with a cross sea at 3 meters. This is a death ship.

STH is not the race for this boat IMHO. Especially not as a shake down.



Just my 2c, flame away.

 
It's basically a big Open 60, Paps, designed to break transatlantic, transpacific, and even possibly a RTW record.  And perhaps most importantly, there was no JuanK involvement.
 
Do you think it should be able to handle a Hobart with those credentials?

So what changed your mind from last year?

 

 

Displacement



#2806 huey 2

huey 2

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 322 posts
  • Location:syd
  • Interests:yes

Posted 27 December 2015 - 09:06 PM

Alt_SYHO15sg_018671.jpg



#2807 wildboats

wildboats

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 395 posts
  • Location:sydney
  • Interests:yachts

Posted 27 December 2015 - 10:23 PM

Good race by Comanche, credit to them for hanging in there when the shit hit the fan - she's a tough boat or is it a HE

hopefully with her Aussie conection they will bring the beast back down under next year - the lure of the race record might be enough.

It's not the same race when it's only the Oats show.

 

where to next for Comanche and Rambler ?



#2808 Outlaw Country!

Outlaw Country!

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 712 posts

Posted 27 December 2015 - 10:30 PM

Antigua for the RORC 600 in six weeks. Wild Oats could probably get a new main fitted in time but they won't be joining them because they're a one trick pony (who forgot how to do their trick!!!!)



#2809 pulpit

pulpit

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 538 posts
  • Location:Gold Coast,, Queensland

Posted 27 December 2015 - 10:35 PM

Antigua for the RORC 600 in six weeks. Wild Oats could probably get a new main fitted in time but they won't be joining them because they're a one trick pony (who forgot how to do their trick!!!!)


Oats is back in time to do the Coffs race.

It could be the new race to dominate and learn their one trick again.

Pulpit

#2810 USA190520

USA190520

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,972 posts
  • Location:mostly here but not all there

Posted 27 December 2015 - 10:42 PM

Oats is on a dyslexic diet-

Wait, you lost!

#2811 wildboats

wildboats

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 395 posts
  • Location:sydney
  • Interests:yachts

Posted 27 December 2015 - 11:12 PM

Antigua for the RORC 600 in six weeks. Wild Oats could probably get a new main fitted in time but they won't be joining them because they're a one trick pony (who forgot how to do their trick!!!!)

who will they be chasing if WO doesn't go 



#2812 forss

forss

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 710 posts

Posted 27 December 2015 - 11:18 PM

Antigua for the RORC 600 in six weeks. Wild Oats could probably get a new main fitted in time but they won't be joining them because they're a one trick pony (who forgot how to do their trick!!!!)

who will they be chasing if WO doesn't go

Multihulls ;)

#2813 wildboats

wildboats

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 395 posts
  • Location:sydney
  • Interests:yachts

Posted 27 December 2015 - 11:36 PM

don't say multihull - you'll never shut them up!



#2814 dcbsheb

dcbsheb

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 831 posts
  • Location:Sheboygan, WI

Posted 28 December 2015 - 12:41 AM

Will Phaedo be there?



#2815 Outlaw Country!

Outlaw Country!

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 712 posts

Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:30 AM

And Concise. So Comanche to be 3rd over the line. First monohull though - or "sailboat" if you're the CYCA. 



#2816 thefirstpelican

thefirstpelican

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 35 posts
  • Location:pth
  • Interests:not guns

Posted 30 December 2015 - 01:46 AM

2 Juan K boats in the top 4.



#2817 huey 2

huey 2

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 322 posts
  • Location:syd
  • Interests:yes

Posted 03 January 2016 - 08:00 AM

See yah Keith........

 

Thanks Jim And Kristy      10857800_10152971891799516_7615530502214



#2818 huey 2

huey 2

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 322 posts
  • Location:syd
  • Interests:yes

Posted 03 January 2016 - 08:02 AM

You have done something special

  hope yah come back                     34-700x386.jpg



#2819 Terrafirma

Terrafirma

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,121 posts

Posted 03 January 2016 - 08:43 AM

Officially the fastest 100 in the world. Hope they come back but it doesn't sound that way. 



#2820 Wess

Wess

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,606 posts

Posted 03 January 2016 - 03:19 PM

Is Comanche still doing Antigua or is there too much bottom and rudder damage to get repaired in time?



#2821 Recidivist

Recidivist

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,900 posts
  • Location:I come from a land down under
  • Interests:sailing, building sailing boats, cruising, racing, day sailing.

Posted 04 January 2016 - 10:58 AM

You have done something special

  hope yah come back                     34-700x386.jpg

+1



#2822 Outlaw Country!

Outlaw Country!

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 712 posts

Posted 05 January 2016 - 03:14 PM

This photo shows exactly why I think Jim Clark has created an awesome, fun loving team that does it right. No pretenses or airs to keep up like their Australian counterparts. Just fun loving people who do it right. We can't wait to cheer you boys on when you're back home in New England in a few months!

G0uM0ge.jpg

#2823 Edith Bicknell

Edith Bicknell

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,880 posts
  • Interests:Merlin Rockets

    Summering on the Vineyard
    Wintering on St. Bart's

Posted 05 January 2016 - 03:48 PM

This photo shows exactly why I think Jim Clark has created an awesome, fun loving team that does it right. No pretenses or airs to keep up like their Australian counterparts. Just fun loving people who do it right. We can't wait to cheer you boys on when you're back home in New England in a few months!

G0uM0ge.jpg

In other news,
Uber rich fucker wins yacht race.
And thats a pretty crappy tender all things considered

#2824 bigrpowr

bigrpowr

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 856 posts
  • Location:moorpark
  • Interests:big horsepower

Posted 06 January 2016 - 01:48 AM

 

This photo shows exactly why I think Jim Clark has created an awesome, fun loving team that does it right. No pretenses or airs to keep up like their Australian counterparts. Just fun loving people who do it right. We can't wait to cheer you boys on when you're back home in New England in a few months!

G0uM0ge.jpg

In other news,
Uber rich fucker wins yacht race.
And thats a pretty crappy tender all things considered

 

i'd be willing to guess he has a nice tender , AT HOME .



#2825 uncle chop chop

uncle chop chop

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 91 posts
  • Location:pentridge yc

Posted 06 January 2016 - 02:50 AM

Having more fun then the people in the tender off the port bow.



#2826 Terrafirma

Terrafirma

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,121 posts

Posted 06 January 2016 - 07:29 AM

Having more fun then the people in the tender off the port bow.

 

+1 



#2827 Presuming Ed

Presuming Ed

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,559 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 06 January 2016 - 08:23 AM

This photo shows exactly why I think Jim Clark has created an awesome, fun loving team that does it right. No pretenses or airs to keep up like their Australian counterparts. Just fun loving people who do it right. We can't wait to cheer you boys on when you're back home in New England in a few months! G0uM0ge.jpg


Most cries of "cultural appropriation" are bollox, but war bonnets? In 2015? Really?

Wow. Maybe they should rename the boat Utterly Insensitive idiot.

#2828 Terrorvision

Terrorvision

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,188 posts
  • Interests:Taking 'the' out of Psychotherapist

Posted 06 January 2016 - 10:07 AM

Most cries of cultural insensitivity are made by white people with sandy vaginas.



#2829 CrushDigital

CrushDigital

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,479 posts
  • Location:New York, NY

Posted 06 January 2016 - 10:50 PM

Nah, I think this one is pretty universally established at this point.



#2830 jonas a

jonas a

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 566 posts
  • Location:Norway

Posted 07 January 2016 - 01:02 PM

So if one would decide to try to break a multi 24h record from less than 10 years ago. Could that be achieved with Comanche? What kind of modifications would it require? Less lead? Longer keel fin? More canting? New foils? Original weight 8000kg heavier than eg spindrift 2. Not sure if relevant, but just for comparance

#2831 Situation Normal

Situation Normal

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 58 posts
  • Location:QLD, Australia
  • Interests:not much

Posted 07 January 2016 - 09:29 PM

So if one would decide to try to break a multi 24h record from less than 10 years ago. Could that be achieved with Comanche? What kind of modifications would it require? Less lead? Longer keel fin? More canting? New foils? Original weight 8000kg heavier than eg spindrift 2. Not sure if relevant, but just for comparance

add another hull would be a good start, last time I looked it was a mono.



#2832 rantifarian

rantifarian

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,026 posts
  • Location:Central Queensland

Posted 07 January 2016 - 09:57 PM

So if one would decide to try to break a multi 24h record from less than 10 years ago. Could that be achieved with Comanche? What kind of modifications would it require? Less lead? Longer keel fin? More canting? New foils? Original weight 8000kg heavier than eg spindrift 2. Not sure if relevant, but just for comparance

So you are asking what modifications could be made to the current monohull 24h record holder, a nearly new boat, built with no thought to rating and an open checkbook, to make it faster for 24h record breaking?

First, replace the rig with one off a modern ultime multi.
Then replace the foils with those from a modern ultime multi.
Finally, replace the single hull with the three from a modern ultime multi.
Dickhead

#2833 jonas a

jonas a

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 566 posts
  • Location:Norway

Posted 07 January 2016 - 10:28 PM

So if one would decide to try to break a multi 24h record from less than 10 years ago. Could that be achieved with Comanche? What kind of modifications would it require? Less lead? Longer keel fin? More canting? New foils? Original weight 8000kg heavier than eg spindrift 2. Not sure if relevant, but just for comparance

So you are asking what modifications could be made to the current monohull 24h record holder, a nearly new boat, built with no thought to rating and an open checkbook, to make it faster for 24h record breaking?
First, replace the rig with one off a modern ultime multi.
Then replace the foils with those from a modern ultime multi.
Finally, replace the single hull with the three from a modern ultime multi.
Dickhead
Hey, chill, obviously it is the most breathtaking 100 footer out there and as impressive as a 600+ nm 24h run for a monohull is, It doesn't mean that the boat is perfect. Given what we already have seen on smaller boats, I think it is fully appropriate to speculate what could be done to enhance the performance even further if the owners chose to do so one day. Obviously experimenting on a 100 footer is a little more risky than on a IMOCA60, so I don't expect it to happen anytime soon. Also there won't probably be a need unless a newer and faster 100footer is being built

#2834 Situation Normal

Situation Normal

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 58 posts
  • Location:QLD, Australia
  • Interests:not much

Posted 07 January 2016 - 11:23 PM

 

 

So if one would decide to try to break a multi 24h record from less than 10 years ago. Could that be achieved with Comanche? What kind of modifications would it require? Less lead? Longer keel fin? More canting? New foils? Original weight 8000kg heavier than eg spindrift 2. Not sure if relevant, but just for comparance

So you are asking what modifications could be made to the current monohull 24h record holder, a nearly new boat, built with no thought to rating and an open checkbook, to make it faster for 24h record breaking?
First, replace the rig with one off a modern ultime multi.
Then replace the foils with those from a modern ultime multi.
Finally, replace the single hull with the three from a modern ultime multi.
Dickhead
Hey, chill, obviously it is the most breathtaking 100 footer out there and as impressive as a 600+ nm 24h run for a monohull is, It doesn't mean that the boat is perfect. Given what we already have seen on smaller boats, I think it is fully appropriate to speculate what could be done to enhance the performance even further if the owners chose to do so one day. Obviously experimenting on a 100 footer is a little more risky than on a IMOCA60, so I don't expect it to happen anytime soon. Also there won't probably be a need unless a newer and faster 100footer is being built

 

maybe take out your reference to multi 24hr records in your original if you don't like the comment princess



#2835 GybeSetŪ

GybeSetŪ

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,984 posts
  • Location:the 'River of Light', Tomorrow-morrow Land

Posted 07 January 2016 - 11:24 PM

 i reckon Cs & WO rigs are just as advanced for their particular application, 

 

also if a faster 100 is built your speculation is then redundant

 

 

weight is probably 'light' given the volume of the boat, theres been tender maxis before and they are dogs



#2836 jonas a

jonas a

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 566 posts
  • Location:Norway

Posted 07 January 2016 - 11:58 PM

So if one would decide to try to break a multi 24h record from less than 10 years ago. Could that be achieved with Comanche? What kind of modifications would it require? Less lead? Longer keel fin? More canting? New foils? Original weight 8000kg heavier than eg spindrift 2. Not sure if relevant, but just for comparance

So you are asking what modifications could be made to the current monohull 24h record holder, a nearly new boat, built with no thought to rating and an open checkbook, to make it faster for 24h record breaking?
First, replace the rig with one off a modern ultime multi.
Then replace the foils with those from a modern ultime multi.
Finally, replace the single hull with the three from a modern ultime multi.
Dickhead
Hey, chill, obviously it is the most breathtaking 100 footer out there and as impressive as a 600+ nm 24h run for a monohull is, It doesn't mean that the boat is perfect. Given what we already have seen on smaller boats, I think it is fully appropriate to speculate what could be done to enhance the performance even further if the owners chose to do so one day. Obviously experimenting on a 100 footer is a little more risky than on a IMOCA60, so I don't expect it to happen anytime soon. Also there won't probably be a need unless a newer and faster 100footer is being built
maybe take out your reference to multi 24hr records in your original if you don't like the comment princess
write whatever you want if that makes you feel good. Have to admit though that the reason for this discussion wasn't directly because I think that the big Indian is slow, but because I stumbled on the Clean-Breymaier discussion from last July and was curious about other opinions. I guess those opinions were delivered quite effectively.

#2837 edusail

edusail

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 21 posts

Posted 08 January 2016 - 08:05 PM

 

 

 

 

So if one would decide to try to break a multi 24h record from less than 10 years ago. Could that be achieved with Comanche? What kind of modifications would it require? Less lead? Longer keel fin? More canting? New foils? Original weight 8000kg heavier than eg spindrift 2. Not sure if relevant, but just for comparance

So you are asking what modifications could be made to the current monohull 24h record holder, a nearly new boat, built with no thought to rating and an open checkbook, to make it faster for 24h record breaking?
First, replace the rig with one off a modern ultime multi.
Then replace the foils with those from a modern ultime multi.
Finally, replace the single hull with the three from a modern ultime multi.
Dickhead
Hey, chill, obviously it is the most breathtaking 100 footer out there and as impressive as a 600+ nm 24h run for a monohull is, It doesn't mean that the boat is perfect. Given what we already have seen on smaller boats, I think it is fully appropriate to speculate what could be done to enhance the performance even further if the owners chose to do so one day. Obviously experimenting on a 100 footer is a little more risky than on a IMOCA60, so I don't expect it to happen anytime soon. Also there won't probably be a need unless a newer and faster 100footer is being built
maybe take out your reference to multi 24hr records in your original if you don't like the comment princess
write whatever you want if that makes you feel good. Have to admit though that the reason for this discussion wasn't directly because I think that the big Indian is slow, but because I stumbled on the Clean-Breymaier discussion from last July and was curious about other opinions. I guess those opinions were delivered quite effectively.

If comanche was only about passage records it would look more like a 60.  Wing mast, some sort of curved/L boards, substantially lighter.  According to the guys that put together the design brief it is designed "to compete in races", which means safety regulations (like the vanishing stability index in all offshore races) which inherently makes the bulb/keel heavy and adds structure etc.  To do those races for the most part you have to be GL compliant (insurance) which also adds weight and structure. The fact that it was made to race is the reason it looks and designed the way it does.  Straight boards because this boat has to go upwind, and they are still the best alternative upwind/downwind (because downwind they can disappear) .  And most of the great races in the world are some sort of windward/leeward courses typically along coast lines.  Thought this might help solve the mystery. 



#2838 jonas a

jonas a

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 566 posts
  • Location:Norway

Posted 08 January 2016 - 09:10 PM

^Good answer, although the foils on the imocas look like they do because of the five appendix limitation, so on C it would rather be a DSS type foil, I think?. The imocas are not designed to compete in "races" but in a specific race and also because there are 20 other almost identical boats, certain design risks are taken to make it a little more likely to hit the podium. Also the Imoca's are a couple of tons heavier than a MOD70, so with a little higher safety margin I guess that the current weight of C is reasonable... 



#2839 DickDastardly

DickDastardly

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,012 posts
  • Location:Syderney

Posted 08 January 2016 - 11:09 PM

^Good answer, although the foils on the imocas look like they do because of the five appendix limitation, so on C it would rather be a DSS type foil, I think?. The imocas are not designed to compete in "races" but in a specific race and also because there are 20 other almost identical boats, certain design risks are taken to make it a little more likely to hit the podium. Also the Imoca's are a couple of tons heavier than a MOD70, so with a little higher safety margin I guess that the current weight of C is reasonable... 

Flying a 30 ton boat is no small ask. The foils would need to be very heavy. Rambler is around 21 tons I believe, and the maxi Tris somewhere around there too, less even. There are diseconomies of scale with foiling as the weight of a boat cubes with linear increases in size at a constant geometry. One of the tradons AC72s were dropped - can go just as fast in something much smaller and cheaper.

Plus, Comanche's design trim is well heeled - that's how the beam generates high RM, whereas DSS boats typically fly fairly level. The Rambler DSS setup is probably similar to what C would run but it's unclear how effective that has been. The DSS would have to run very big dihedral angles to be effective, if it points downwards as the boat heels it creates leeway and drag and lift is reduced. WOXI sails downwind pretty low and flat so the DSS foil is pretty horizontal.

#2840 jonas a

jonas a

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 566 posts
  • Location:Norway

Posted 08 January 2016 - 11:54 PM

With the DSS, if you get it working as intended, you should at least be able to carry more sail or use less ballast, but I think if the boat wasn't designed with that system in mind from the beginning, retrofitting might perhaps not work too well

On the Imoca threads there's a lot more about foiling, so unless specifically applicable to C, it's unnecessary to dig deeper in this thread. Anyhow it won't be moth type foiling anytime soon for big C ;) The Infiniti 46 will be in St Barth. Maybe it will give some indication on what is about to come or we will have to wait for the 53 or the 100....

#2841 huey 2

huey 2

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 322 posts
  • Location:syd
  • Interests:yes

Posted 09 January 2016 - 10:39 AM

944690_10153723308010609_867862560265040



#2842 huey 2

huey 2

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 322 posts
  • Location:syd
  • Interests:yes

Posted 09 January 2016 - 12:41 PM



#2843 Outlaw Country!

Outlaw Country!

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 712 posts

Posted 09 January 2016 - 02:28 PM

^Good answer, although the foils on the imocas look like they do because of the five appendix limitation, so on C it would rather be a DSS type foil, I think?. The imocas are not designed to compete in "races" but in a specific race and also because there are 20 other almost identical boats, certain design risks are taken to make it a little more likely to hit the podium. Also the Imoca's are a couple of tons heavier than a MOD70, so with a little higher safety margin I guess that the current weight of C is reasonable... 

Flying a 30 ton boat is no small ask. The foils would need to be very heavy. Rambler is around 21 tons I believe, and the maxi Tris somewhere around there too, less even. There are diseconomies of scale with foiling as the weight of a boat cubes with linear increases in size at a constant geometry. One of the tradons AC72s were dropped - can go just as fast in something much smaller and cheaper.

Plus, Comanche's design trim is well heeled - that's how the beam generates high RM, whereas DSS boats typically fly fairly level. The Rambler DSS setup is probably similar to what C would run but it's unclear how effective that has been. The DSS would have to run very big dihedral angles to be effective, if it points downwards as the boat heels it creates leeway and drag and lift is reduced. WOXI sails downwind pretty low and flat so the DSS foil is pretty horizontal.

Rambler removed their system.

#2844 JL92S

JL92S

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 795 posts

Posted 09 January 2016 - 11:51 PM

^Good answer, although the foils on the imocas look like they do because of the five appendix limitation, so on C it would rather be a DSS type foil, I think?. The imocas are not designed to compete in "races" but in a specific race and also because there are 20 other almost identical boats, certain design risks are taken to make it a little more likely to hit the podium. Also the Imoca's are a couple of tons heavier than a MOD70, so with a little higher safety margin I guess that the current weight of C is reasonable...

There's nothing stopping them from having a pair of Dali foils that stay retracted upwind and then deployed when reaching and downwind and the straight boards lifted, that way the straight boards could be optimised for upwind work and the Dali foils optimised for reaching work (would look more like HB foils than Safran foils, more open angle)

#2845 DickDastardly

DickDastardly

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,012 posts
  • Location:Syderney

Posted 10 January 2016 - 11:47 AM

^Good answer, although the foils on the imocas look like they do because of the five appendix limitation, so on C it would rather be a DSS type foil, I think?. The imocas are not designed to compete in "races" but in a specific race and also because there are 20 other almost identical boats, certain design risks are taken to make it a little more likely to hit the podium. Also the Imoca's are a couple of tons heavier than a MOD70, so with a little higher safety margin I guess that the current weight of C is reasonable... 

Flying a 30 ton boat is no small ask. The foils would need to be very heavy. Rambler is around 21 tons I believe, and the maxi Tris somewhere around there too, less even. There are diseconomies of scale with foiling as the weight of a boat cubes with linear increases in size at a constant geometry. One of the tradons AC72s were dropped - can go just as fast in something much smaller and cheaper.

Plus, Comanche's design trim is well heeled - that's how the beam generates high RM, whereas DSS boats typically fly fairly level. The Rambler DSS setup is probably similar to what C would run but it's unclear how effective that has been. The DSS would have to run very big dihedral angles to be effective, if it points downwards as the boat heels it creates leeway and drag and lift is reduced. WOXI sails downwind pretty low and flat so the DSS foil is pretty horizontal.
Rambler removed their system.
It was still there a couple of days begotten Sydney - Hobart. I had a look at the boat and the foil slots were still there

#2846 Outlaw Country!

Outlaw Country!

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 712 posts

Posted 10 January 2016 - 01:44 PM

In Nics interview GD said it was out

#2847 Terrafirma

Terrafirma

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,121 posts

Posted 11 January 2016 - 12:52 AM

 

 

^Good answer, although the foils on the imocas look like they do because of the five appendix limitation, so on C it would rather be a DSS type foil, I think?. The imocas are not designed to compete in "races" but in a specific race and also because there are 20 other almost identical boats, certain design risks are taken to make it a little more likely to hit the podium. Also the Imoca's are a couple of tons heavier than a MOD70, so with a little higher safety margin I guess that the current weight of C is reasonable... 

Flying a 30 ton boat is no small ask. The foils would need to be very heavy. Rambler is around 21 tons I believe, and the maxi Tris somewhere around there too, less even. There are diseconomies of scale with foiling as the weight of a boat cubes with linear increases in size at a constant geometry. One of the tradons AC72s were dropped - can go just as fast in something much smaller and cheaper.

Plus, Comanche's design trim is well heeled - that's how the beam generates high RM, whereas DSS boats typically fly fairly level. The Rambler DSS setup is probably similar to what C would run but it's unclear how effective that has been. The DSS would have to run very big dihedral angles to be effective, if it points downwards as the boat heels it creates leeway and drag and lift is reduced. WOXI sails downwind pretty low and flat so the DSS foil is pretty horizontal.

Rambler removed their system.

 

 

It was said that Rambler's DSS was always part of the design? If they have removed it now then obviously it's been a failure. Would be nice to know exactly what was happening or what was not happening with their DSS?



#2848 jack_sparrow

jack_sparrow

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,419 posts

Posted 11 January 2016 - 01:25 AM

If removed or not deployed then surely a simple case of not enough added RM to offset the additional drag or if it is doing its stuff, that is only happening in a very narrow conditions window.

#2849 nixon

nixon

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 254 posts

Posted 11 January 2016 - 10:04 AM

If removed or not deployed then surely a simple case of not enough added RM to offset the additional drag or if it is doing its stuff, that is only happening in a very narrow conditions window.

 

And / or possibly they get hammered under IRC for DSS?

 

Middle Sea race with DSS: 1.902

Hobart without DSS: 1.826

 

They got 5th of 7 in div 0 in Hobart (of 13 starters).

 

They took 68 hours for a corrected time of 124 hours. To achieve that with the "+DSS IRC*" number, they would have needed to finish the race in 65 hours. I wonder if they would have been 3 hours quicker with DSS?

 

(*assuming that there were no other significant mods between these races)

 

Anyone have info on how IRC treats DSS-style foils? Or Dali foils for that matter.



#2850 jonas a

jonas a

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 566 posts
  • Location:Norway

Posted 11 January 2016 - 05:39 PM

It's quite random in a single race. Maybe a bit faster during the first night could've made them avoid the hole before the finish, pure speculation.

#2851 GBH

GBH

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 225 posts
  • Location:mostly Oz

Posted 12 January 2016 - 10:56 AM

 

If removed or not deployed then surely a simple case of not enough added RM to offset the additional drag or if it is doing its stuff, that is only happening in a very narrow conditions window.

 

And / or possibly they get hammered under IRC for DSS?

 

Middle Sea race with DSS: 1.902

Hobart without DSS: 1.826

 

They got 5th of 7 in div 0 in Hobart (of 13 starters).

 

They took 68 hours for a corrected time of 124 hours. To achieve that with the "+DSS IRC*" number, they would have needed to finish the race in 65 hours. I wonder if they would have been 3 hours quicker with DSS?

 

(*assuming that there were no other significant mods between these races)

 

Anyone have info on how IRC treats DSS-style foils? Or Dali foils for that matter.

 

I hear that ORC and IRC treat these foils differently, so ORC has inputs for the foil dimensions as seen on the WO cert, but IRC simply applies another increment to hull factor for DSS.  So that rather assumes that DSS has been optimally done for the boat and if that's not the case then it won't live with the rating cost.  Sailor Girl's pics that were around showed left and right boards which presumably met at the middle, and that would limit the possible extension from the hull to something pretty small and probably not big enough to be really effective against the rating cost.  They might have done better having an ORC cert as well.



#2852 huey 2

huey 2

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 322 posts
  • Location:syd
  • Interests:yes

Posted 18 January 2016 - 09:08 AM

CGb8xVIXEAAWj0z.jpg



#2853 Matt DI

Matt DI

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 101 posts
  • Location:Charleston the one on the Atlantic
  • Interests:clean living

Posted Yesterday, 01:55 PM

May be old hat by now but Comanche just got back in the States from Australia. We Discharged her yesterday on a blustery Charleston morning. It appears she be here for a little work before heading south. Just don't realize how big this boat is until your standing underneath it.

 

Attached Files



#2854 forss

forss

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 710 posts

Posted Yesterday, 02:26 PM

Nice pics, thanks!

 

Where's rig?



#2855 Matt DI

Matt DI

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 101 posts
  • Location:Charleston the one on the Atlantic
  • Interests:clean living

Posted Yesterday, 02:33 PM

Nice pics, thanks!

 

Where's rig?

We put it on a deck barge with the cradle. They're going to pull the boat out of the water for some TLC than re-launch. I'm assuming they'll step it after the boat goes back in the water.



#2856 Gio'

Gio'

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 15 posts
  • Location:Palermo, Italy
  • Interests:Motorsports and sailing

Posted Yesterday, 07:18 PM

Are they on time for caribbean 600? Just 2 weeks from the start!

#2857 Matt DI

Matt DI

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 101 posts
  • Location:Charleston the one on the Atlantic
  • Interests:clean living

Posted Yesterday, 08:01 PM

Are they on time for caribbean 600? Just 2 weeks from the start!

They said they have 1 week to get everything done so that they can make it for the start. Looked like some minor repairs to the hull where the port dagger board was slamming, installing replacement board and some other cosmetic stuff.



#2858 Matt DI

Matt DI

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 101 posts
  • Location:Charleston the one on the Atlantic
  • Interests:clean living

Posted Yesterday, 08:06 PM

They said they have a week to get the work done ( fix some small holes in the hull from the banging port board, install the replacement and some other cosmetic stuff). Then the boat will be heading south for the start.



#2859 DtM

DtM

    Anarchist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,602 posts
  • Location:Out of the Office

Posted Yesterday, 09:59 PM

Thanks Matt great to have some first hand info.







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: jim clark, vplp, supermaxi, verdier, record breaker, offshore

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users