San Francisco 3
Clear lakes 1
Yountville 1
San Francisco fleet is born! Let's celebrate...
If you're one of the owners Please PM me your email address (unless you've already done it), I'd like to have a way to reach the SF Bay owners.
Thanks,
Cazza
Posted 20 November 2005 - 07:43 AM
Posted 20 November 2005 - 12:29 PM
Posted 28 November 2005 - 09:58 PM
Posted 28 November 2005 - 10:43 PM
[and #70 went to France. French are good at it
Posted 28 November 2005 - 10:59 PM
[and #70 went to France. French are good at it
What? is that true? I am waiting for a french fleet to materialize. I've been pumping the project on a Yacht/Sailing chat board there to see if I can get any interest. Let me know of any details. If things get going there, I am going to join in.
Posted 28 November 2005 - 11:00 PM
[and #70 went to France. French are good at it
What? is that true? I am waiting for a french fleet to materialize. I've been pumping the project on a Yacht/Sailing chat board there to see if I can get any interest. Let me know of any details. If things get going there, I am going to join in.
Posted 28 November 2005 - 11:08 PM
-- Raffaele
#69 (but don't tell anybody)
Posted 29 November 2005 - 04:02 PM
NorCal might not be the biggest fleet, but will certainly be the best looking one... (did I mention my Prada outfit?)
![]()
Cazza
Posted 06 December 2005 - 03:49 AM
Posted 06 December 2005 - 06:52 AM
Just a thought to the SF Bay guys.
I strongly suggest you consider buying boats on trailers.
Posted 06 December 2005 - 03:10 PM
Posted 06 December 2005 - 03:59 PM
There are hoist in SF Bay area I have used. Brickyard Cove in Pt. Richmond is were I kept my 30 for a long time and now keep my Melges 24.. The hoist in Alameda near Svendsen's is good but a little crowed like Brickyard.. St. Francis and Encinal YC have capability but I have not used them. A real great hoist is at Stockton Sailing Club so at the end of a cruise or the Delta Ditch Race.
As for Clearlake, I will have to ramp launch. Thats why the boat will be mostly down in the bay - drysailed.
Pat
Posted 06 December 2005 - 04:51 PM
I tend to agree and I know of at least three FTs in SD (out of seven) including mine that will be drysailed.Just a thought to the SF Bay guys.
I strongly suggest you consider buying boats on trailers.
Sailing in the Bay is GREAT thing, but it's not the ONLY thing. A boat on a trailer has access to Santa Cruz, Monterey, Huntington Lake, Lake Tahoe. Not to mention racing to Santa Cruz with the Windjammers, then hauling out and driving back at 55mph, instead of a long uphill water delivery.
If a fleet begins with a tradition of trailer sailing, it's going to be easier to continue that vs. trying to get it started in a fleet of boats that are kept without trailers.
I bring this up because the local J/24 fleet has been "Bay bound" for so long that we're having some trouble "mounting up" the local sailors for the regional champtionship to be held next summer in Lake Tahoe.
Just food for thought...
-SteveH
Posted 06 December 2005 - 07:42 PM
Posted 04 February 2006 - 09:13 AM
Posted 04 February 2006 - 03:47 PM
"The part I like less is that I'll need a gas-sucker."
Hey Cazza
Before going off and buying a "Ford F-two gallons to the mile" to tow your boat you might want to figure out if renting a truck for the times you need it is a better option. If you're only going to need to tow it a half dozen times a year, spending a couple hundred bucks at U-Haul for a rental pick up might be a better way to go (assuming of course you don't need it for your everyday launching).
If you really want to get detailed figure out what the Fordosaurus total cost is (payments, license, insurance etc) and when your spending more than that to rent a vehicle to move your boat it's time to buy (yes, my parents meet in accounting school, please don't hold that against me ;-)
Can't wait to see a couple of these at Whidbey Island Race Week.
Paul
Posted 04 February 2006 - 04:52 PM
Posted 06 February 2006 - 07:01 AM
Posted 06 February 2006 - 07:38 AM
Posted 06 February 2006 - 11:42 PM
Posted 10 February 2006 - 06:38 AM
Posted 10 February 2006 - 07:57 PM
Posted 19 February 2006 - 12:49 AM
You would almost certainly distroy your car over time. Another option for the short trip is a $500.00 special that already has a tow hitch. Park it in the lot and just use it to move the boat. I have a friend who used that trick for years.
Posted 07 March 2006 - 08:47 PM
Posted 07 March 2006 - 10:37 PM
Posted 07 March 2006 - 11:37 PM
Posted 08 March 2006 - 12:05 AM
Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:04 AM
Ship o' Fools, Mr. San Jose, or Marc - any one will do.Would Mr. San Jose also post his/her name ? (Mr. Ship o' Fools would that be you ?)
Also, I am assuming you'll be part of the San Francisco fleet.
Posted 08 March 2006 - 04:34 AM
Posted 08 March 2006 - 05:14 AM
Posted 28 September 2006 - 07:31 PM
Posted 19 October 2006 - 05:39 AM
Posted 26 October 2006 - 04:21 PM
Actually, with just a tiny bit of knowledge, you could easily tow it with an Accord and suffer no damage at all. Here is why. The issue has very little to do with total weight. The issue is more related to change of speed in time. So, don't start or stop quickly and all will be fine. If the car is a manual with a tall first gear; you'll end up wearing out the clutch if you are not so good at operating it with care. If the car is an automatic - then a torque converter is awesome for managing power under heavy load. Again, just start and stop VERY SLOWLY and you could tow that thing with a 40 year old VW bug - with no damage. Of course, when going more than a mile; none of us has the patience to be so gentle and destoying the car is inevitable. However, for 500 yards? - I'd go fot it. Besides, it's an Accord - you already need a new car.I have a feeling that you are going to destroy parts of your car if you use it to move the traler every weekend, but I could be wrong.
Does anyone have an idea of how much the towing weight would be??
Posted 26 October 2006 - 04:54 PM
you'll end up wearing out the clutch if you are not so good at operating it with care.
Posted 26 October 2006 - 08:40 PM
The tongue weight over time will cause damage to your suspension. And I think that the total weight will put demands on the car that it is not designed to take, regardless of how slow you accelerate and brake, but perhaps it depends on the particular car and driver as to how much.Actually, with just a tiny bit of knowledge, you could easily tow it with an Accord and suffer no damage at all. Here is why. The issue has very little to do with total weight. The issue is more related to change of speed in time. So, don't start or stop quickly and all will be fine. If the car is a manual with a tall first gear; you'll end up wearing out the clutch if you are not so good at operating it with care. If the car is an automatic - then a torque converter is awesome for managing power under heavy load. Again, just start and stop VERY SLOWLY and you could tow that thing with a 40 year old VW bug - with no damage. Of course, when going more than a mile; none of us has the patience to be so gentle and destoying the car is inevitable. However, for 500 yards? - I'd go fot it. Besides, it's an Accord - you already need a new car.
Posted 27 October 2006 - 03:29 AM
Woaah! I'm Italian... any allusion to the fact that I can't operate a clutch is a serious insult that only blood splilling can wash. Capisci?
I'll let this one go, but watch your moves...
Cazza
(PS: I've got the impression that on this side of the ocean they really underestimate what torque can do. I remember when I was a kid Germans on the italian riviera were towing the impossible behind what then was considered a full size mercedes but with engines comparable to today's Civics)
Posted 27 October 2006 - 04:06 AM
Aren't you a guido? Did the insane penis evy of male Italian drivers make it through several genarations and across an ocean intact?
Posted 27 October 2006 - 05:15 AM
well I crossed the pond less then 7 years ago. It took some time to loose driving patterns, though... For the first few years I've been one of the major benefactors of the local police. I think I learnt most of my english at traffic schools...
![]()
Now when I'm back home it takes me 2-3 days to re-adjust to the adrenaline required to drive decent speeds (at least 80-90 Kph in heavy urban traffic and twice that speed in 2 lanes freeways).
Cazza
Posted 27 October 2006 - 05:27 AM
Nonsense. You can bottom out the suspension and drive for a week without damage. You can't go over a bump, particularly fast, without damaging suspension.The tongue weight over time will cause damage to your suspension.
Posted 16 November 2006 - 05:53 AM
Posted 16 November 2006 - 06:33 AM
Thanks Paul.
I had checked at Hertz Truck, and in fact It may make sense (around a 100 bucks a day).
What I'm trying to figure out also is if I can use my Accord to tow the boat for the fifty flat yards from the dry storage to the hoist. The bigger towing package says 3000 pounds, what happen if I tow 4500 for a few yards?
Cazza
Posted 16 November 2006 - 04:35 PM
If your are to stay in the yard exclusivly ( Not down the block at 35mph )
move the center of gravity "Fwd" a bit to reduce the load on the htch
remeber to move it back for the open road
Trust me on this one
Posted 16 November 2006 - 10:13 PM
I think DA-WOODY meant to say that if you're just using your trailer around the yard, you could move the center of gravity AFT a bit to reduce the tongue weight and load on the hitch. That also makes it easier to crank the tongue up and down with the wheel jack.
But doing so is BAD for trailerability on the open road. Weight forward, and heavy tongue weight (within reason) leads to steady tracking on the road. Weight aft leads to "hobby-horsing." I tow my J/24 to 8-10 regattas a year, so I know whereof I speak about towing heavy sailboats.
Keep in mind that if you reduce tongue weight by positioning the boat aft on the trailer, then when it's NOT hooked up to the car, two guys standing on the transom can be enough to cause the whole thing to TIP AFT wildly, suddenly, and out of control. (No, I haven't done this, fortunately.)
Posted 17 November 2006 - 06:19 AM
Posted 17 November 2006 - 04:55 PM
Ok center of gravity was a bad term to use
Let's say move the axles FWD on trailer
Posted 17 November 2006 - 06:12 PM
Ok center of gravity was a bad term to use
Let's say move the axles FWD on trailer
Move those thingies with the tires "FWD"you were talking about shifting the AXLES aft (CB).
I knew we were really in agreement.
Posted 17 November 2006 - 07:01 PM
Posted 17 November 2006 - 07:25 PM
Posted 17 November 2006 - 07:27 PM
Posted 17 November 2006 - 08:37 PM
For the peace of mind of people in this thread, I'm buying a towing vehicle, up to 6,000#. Thanks for the support everybody...
Cazza
Posted 17 November 2006 - 08:44 PM
Posted 17 November 2006 - 08:57 PM
I'm of the opinion that 6,000# is the minimum. By the time you add boat, trailer and boat related shit you're there. You need to account for passengers, too which aren't in that number. I know there are a group (you know who you are Clew
) of people that like the "euro model" of hitching it up to a Civic, but that's not for me. Maybe cuz I'm in the hilly PNW...
Posted 17 November 2006 - 09:33 PM
Posted 17 November 2006 - 09:37 PM
Cazza: the first Seattle boat is here and out of the box. It looks quite good. It's the first finished boat I have seen. It came through shipping just fine. There are a couple of minor scratches on the spar but they can be easily buffed out. The keel and kelp cutter look fine. The hole to remove the kelp cutter blade is finished a bit ratty but that can be cleaned up. The boat was in the slings and hanging close to the water so I could not get a good view of the bottom of the boat. Scott the owner is very happy. Beaming to be sure. Carl Buchan and his wife will be sailing with him on his first race. That should speed up the learning curve and provide some very educated opinions on the boat's performance. This is one of those days I have been looking forward to for a long time.
Posted 17 November 2006 - 10:59 PM
Posted 18 November 2006 - 02:56 PM
Posted 19 November 2006 - 07:13 PM
Cazza: the first Seattle boat is here and out of the box. It looks quite good.......
Carl Buchan and his wife will be sailing with him on his first race. That should speed up the learning curve and provide some very educated opinions on the boat's performance. This is one of those days I have been looking forward to for a long time.
Posted 19 November 2006 - 07:35 PM
Oh no, not Carl Buchan. The PHRF rating is going to suck now. Better to put some hack like me on the boat for the first year to get a decent one
Posted 21 November 2006 - 04:51 AM
Posted 21 November 2006 - 05:44 AM
saw the sails at doyle today. helped out a bit on the reef. hope i can get a ride! :-P congrats cazza
Posted 21 November 2006 - 06:42 AM
Posted 21 November 2006 - 07:47 PM
saw the sails at doyle today. helped out a bit on the reef. hope i can get a ride! :-P congrats cazza
Posted 23 November 2006 - 06:57 PM
Posted 24 November 2006 - 06:27 AM
Posted 28 November 2006 - 10:08 PM
Posted 28 November 2006 - 10:19 PM
Posted 29 November 2006 - 04:37 AM
Posted 29 November 2006 - 11:51 PM
Hey mikey, the sails at doyle, what material are they? Any way I could get a lift as well? I can make sure foredeckhell does not talk too much.
buona serra.
Posted 30 November 2006 - 03:52 PM
Posted 03 December 2006 - 04:43 AM
Posted 15 December 2006 - 02:57 AM
Posted 15 December 2006 - 01:36 PM
Posted 15 December 2006 - 04:37 PM
Centomiglia got splashed today! Mast is up, last details will be finished tomorrow and she'll be ready to be delivered from alameda to point richmond saturday... by my boat partner, since I'll be gone tomorrow
![]()
I'll be back the 26th and hope I'll sail a couple of times between then and the new year. My crew will be gone for the holidays, so if you want to go out for a spin PM me.
Cazza
Posted 15 December 2006 - 10:43 PM
Posted 15 December 2006 - 10:52 PM
Posted 26 December 2006 - 07:01 AM
Posted 29 December 2006 - 10:56 AM
Posted 29 December 2006 - 02:51 PM
Posted 29 December 2006 - 03:49 PM
Posted 30 December 2006 - 05:46 AM
Posted 30 December 2006 - 05:54 AM
My first sail on Centomiglia today!
We stopped by to say hi to the Gate, flew the kite and enjoyed a great winter day on the water. Thanks to Murphy and Foredeckhell, what a great crew...
I'm as high as one can be without using drugs (well, the beer might have helped...).
Cazza
EDIT: and once back at the dock, a great news on my cell: a new depositor in San Fran. He'll be out sailing with us tomorrow. Good times.
Posted 30 December 2006 - 06:43 AM
My first sail on Centomiglia today!
We stopped by to say hi to the Gate, flew the kite and enjoyed a great winter day on the water. Thanks to Murphy and Foredeckhell, what a great crew...
I'm as high as one can be without using drugs (well, the beer might have helped...).
Cazza
EDIT: and once back at the dock, a great news on my cell: a new depositor in San Fran. He'll be out sailing with us tomorrow. Good times.
Posted 30 December 2006 - 07:09 AM
Posted 30 December 2006 - 07:11 AM
Posted 30 December 2006 - 10:55 AM
Posted 30 December 2006 - 07:06 PM
Look Mom, no men on the bow...
![]()
Cazza
Posted 30 December 2006 - 07:16 PM
My guess would be 4 5gal jugs, close to 166lbs, but the lines led aft from the hoist hook look pretty loaded.Is that a couple of water jugs on the bow, or a sail bag? How much water?
Posted 30 December 2006 - 07:48 PM
Posted 31 December 2006 - 04:32 AM
Wow - that angle of the strop looks like the keel edges are going to have a rough life. This is not the proper way to lift a boat. Also looks like you don't have any strops going from the hook to the keel case (to take the load from the hull weight) and you are letting the keel bulb against the hull take the load (from the hull). This is the way I do it on my Viper, which was specifically designed for it. According to Ben the FT is decidedly NOT. Am also unsure if the keel and the keel lift attachment point was designed/built for taking the entire load (hull+keel)? Just don't want you to ruin your baby.........
Posted 31 December 2006 - 04:44 AM
C,
Not an issue. This is the factory recommended lifting method. I was told that Cazza has spacers (Ikea cutting board) fitted inside to protect the leading edge. The trailing edge is not involved since the keel stub meets the cabin top aperture first.
I have done about ten sorties (20 lifts...up & down) and no issues with keel bulb or hull bottom. Both surfaces are pretty much flat per BBBB (well if not.. they are flat now!!). Most of my keel chips were from the shipping instead.
Personally, I'd like a slightly longer strop but looks like Cazza has a tight fit thru the fence.
Boy, I need to pick up a few jerry cans.... it's costing me too many beers to feed the bow guy to keep him there while we lift!
Clew
Posted 31 December 2006 - 05:29 AM
Posted 31 December 2006 - 05:30 AM
Posted 31 December 2006 - 05:35 AM
Posted 31 December 2006 - 06:17 PM
Posted 31 December 2006 - 06:27 PM
I don't understand the rationale for needing TWO aft lines. Its not like the boat is going to tip over sideways. Just take one 1-1/2" strap back to the backstay tang, which has to be the strongest piece of hardware back there anyhow.
Another idea off the top of my head... HANG the plastic jerry cans from the bow pulpit. No chance of them falling over (or even off !) while aloft, and easier to get to when the boat is on the trailer.
Posted 31 December 2006 - 06:46 PM
The angle of the SS back stay tang, which is mounted on and at the same angle as the transom, is not conducive for hook up to the strap at the angle to the lifting point.
Why not hang the jerry cans full of water at the end of the extended sprit for maximum moment arm?
Posted 01 January 2007 - 01:42 AM
... An anarchist came along to help and did a good job at the hoist control ...
Two_Thumbs_Up.JPG 11.04K
78 downloads
Posted 01 January 2007 - 02:27 AM
... Only thing that makes me nervous is sheet strength ...
Keel_up_close_12_30_2006_4_56_32_PM_240x320.JPG 10.02K
160 downloads
jib_sheet_hoist.jpg 13.8K
169 downloads
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users