Aussie FT10 fleet
#101
Posted 27 October 2006 - 06:18 AM
#102
Posted 28 October 2006 - 02:02 AM
Very impressed with boat in general,However motor door & tiller really do let the boat down and will have to be redesigned.
But its a bloody beauty.
Well done.
#72
#103
Posted 28 October 2006 - 04:31 AM
I was very interested in the boat and still am but the duties and taxes were too much.
#104
Posted 31 October 2006 - 07:34 AM
FT43.jpg 85.86K
249 downloadsAs well as Mumm 30's, a 11m OD (Jay's old boat), the FT will compete against these 36' OD's. There is a fleet of about fourteen, ten of which are matched boats.
FT42.jpg 79.55K
160 downloadsgbm,
This FT will probably be the first one to sail in a real breeze to check its predictions. The summer breezes are really starting to happen now. Pity it wasn't out in the 35+kts last saturday week.
#105
Posted 01 November 2006 - 03:23 AM
He had just got his stereo going in the boat and had the music blasting in the back ground.
Unfortunately work commintment will not allow me to get to Perth to see the boat for three weeks.
All the best Jay.
Look forward to hearing how she sails in a blow.
Regards
Strobe No 77
#106
Posted 01 November 2006 - 04:25 AM
thoughts ?
#107
Posted 01 November 2006 - 02:33 PM
#108
Posted 01 November 2006 - 02:35 PM
Congrats on the new boat.
Many thanks for hanging in there with us.
Do you have the rigging plan?
#109
Posted 02 November 2006 - 01:13 AM
It will get cat 3 with that setup.which AUS safety Cat will the FT qualify for, in respect to it's inboard but outboard motor ?
thoughts ?
Not sure about cat 2 though.
Im not sure if i would want to attempt a cat 2 race in the boat.
#110
Posted 02 November 2006 - 01:38 AM
It will get cat 3 with that setup.
Not sure about cat 2 though.
Im not sure if i would want to attempt a cat 2 race in the boat.
Might be a good slide up to Geraldton!
Bob, jaymac is the owner. Frakka is the groupie.....
#111
Posted 02 November 2006 - 03:32 AM
Might be a good slide up to Geraldton!
Bob, jaymac is the owner. Frakka is the Accredited Reporter.....
Thank you glug.
BP, I got involved when Jaymac ran foul of the Ed and was parked up for a while. Jay is pretty busy getting the boat in shape but I'm sure will have lots to say after the launch and trials. My personal opinion is that the delivered boat is good value, generally well finished and any custom fitting etc is more then compensated for by the price. Looking forward to its performance on the water.
Meanwhile, extra (and thicker) bolts and backing plate on lower gudgeon (washer missing?).
Dscn0048.jpg 60.68K
124 downloadsdoor tidied up and keel taped off.
Dscn0050.jpg 69.13K
201 downloads
#112
Posted 02 November 2006 - 03:35 AM
Dscn0051.jpg 103.98K
157 downloads
#113
Posted 02 November 2006 - 03:47 AM
What has jaymac done to fix the motor well? Looks like he's ground back and layed in extra glass to flush up the edges?
#114
Posted 02 November 2006 - 03:55 AM
Ha ha. Thought you'd appreciate that Frakka.
What has jaymac done to fix the motor well? Looks like he's ground back and layed in extra glass to flush up the edges?
And put in a lip to keep the door fair with the hull plus not allowing it to fall down below the hull.
#115
Posted 02 November 2006 - 05:06 AM
And put in a lip to keep the door fair with the hull plus not allowing it to fall down below the hull.
When you have a chance, can you post a pic with the door half opened to show the lip? (graphic detail)
Thanks,
Cazza
#116
Posted 02 November 2006 - 09:29 AM
Cheers,
#117
Posted 02 November 2006 - 02:55 PM
thanks for correcting me. I was confused. Please keep me in the loop.
#118
Posted 03 November 2006 - 01:02 AM
Just as long as you dont get the 30 knot northerlies we've had for the last 2 years.Might be a good slide up to Geraldton!
A nice south wester would be pretty good fun with a nice big assy.
#119
Posted 03 November 2006 - 01:06 AM
Cazza, will get the info and pic's when I can.
Karua, the boat lives at RPYC, probably out sailing saturday.
#120
Posted 03 November 2006 - 07:19 AM
sketch.jpg 24.88K
438 downloadsFor insurance purposes - top 2.5m of track attached by solid fittings as well as glue:
FT54.jpg 96.89K
198 downloads
#121
Posted 03 November 2006 - 07:41 AM
FT57.jpg 102.82K
222 downloadsRigger just started ginning around, saw the champagne glasses go on board, should be a nice sundowner (with borrowed sails).
FT60.jpg 90.22K
302 downloadsIf we can ever get those Australian sails out of customs it won't be long before we have some numbers for top speeds.
I'm sorry Bob, I've missed something here. Australian sails? WTF??
There is a rumour that the customs man in China handling the import/export of #12's sails has gone on holiday and only he can complete the transaction ?, still got a way to go that country.
Makes the whole project pretty remarkable.
#122
Posted 03 November 2006 - 07:56 AM
I missinterpreted Bob's comment, I thought maybe somebody had ordered good Aussie sail for a US boat....
The FT line up with the Freo 36's Frakka?
#123
Posted 03 November 2006 - 08:17 AM
Looks great, can't wait to hear what the Aussie sailors can do with it!
I missinterpreted Bob's comment, I thought maybe somebody had ordered good Aussie sail for a US boat....
The FT line up with the Freo 36's Frakka?
That's right, they are as supplied by the designated sailmaker. Don't know why they can't be delivered straight here from the US, maybe a customs thing with the setup of the whole project ?.
The FT will sail in Div 1 at RPYC against the Foundation 36's, Mumm 30's, Adams 10's, S9.7's, an 11m OD as well as a mixture of other larger and smaller boats. They all sail together at times with SPYC and RFBYC and a couple of Thompson 7.5's and an Elliot 8.7 join in. Quite an issue at SPYC with boats from 7.5m to 18m on the same line.
My resolution for next week is to spend more time on work and less time fucking around at yacht clubs and SA (so much more enjoyable though).
#124
Posted 03 November 2006 - 08:17 AM
Reminder to Bill: next time you ship a hull down under slip a digital camera in the container, Frakka's camera sucks!
Cazza
(EDIT: if you have better resolution pictures can you email to info@ft10class.info, I can use a few for the class website. tx!)
#125
Posted 03 November 2006 - 08:23 AM
I thought they were being made by the Prydey loft in China?That's right, they are as supplied by the designated sailmaker. Don't know why they can't be delivered straight here from the US, maybe a customs thing with setup of the whole project ?.
#126
Posted 03 November 2006 - 08:23 AM
looking good, thanks for the pics Frakka and for the drawings of the door fix. The mast feels good now that it's back home. Should have enough frequent fliers miles for a trip to old Europe now...
Reminder to Bill: next time you ship a hull down under slip a digital camera in the container, Frakka's camera sucks!
Cazza
As long as its Friday and my new resolution hasn't kicked in yet I will reply: how do you get a good photo downloaded if you reduce the pixel count to meet SA spec's ?.
#128
Posted 03 November 2006 - 02:50 PM
#129
Posted 04 November 2006 - 02:33 AM
Cheers!
oh and the boat looks very good - hopefully I'll see one in Sydney sometime?
#130
Posted 04 November 2006 - 03:14 AM
#131
Posted 05 November 2006 - 03:33 AM
Thank you glug.
BP, I got involved when Jaymac ran foul of the Ed and was parked up for a while. Jay is pretty busy getting the boat in shape but I'm sure will have lots to say after the launch and trials. My personal opinion is that the delivered boat is good value, generally well finished and any custom fitting etc is more then compensated for by the price. Looking forward to its performance on the water.
Meanwhile, extra (and thicker) bolts and backing plate on lower gudgeon (washer missing?).Dscn0048.jpg 60.68K 124 downloads
door tidied up and keel taped off.Dscn0050.jpg 69.13K 201 downloads
Geez, BIAM was right. The FT really is a kit boat.
#132
Posted 06 November 2006 - 02:00 AM
#133
Posted 08 November 2006 - 02:50 AM
So jaymac. Honking Sou-Easter on Saturday. How'd you go?
The planned sail was for monday but Jay got spooked by the US rudder cassettes failing in light air. An anchor was sourced in case Panthera suffered the same fate. In any case it was pretty breezy easterlies, still 18-20kts at midday and top gust 31kts. Sail abandoned and work started on a beefed up stainless cassette. IMHO the top gudgeon could have had a higher mounting block to improve the ratio of pintle separation to rudder length, cut down the stressing a little.
#134
Posted 08 November 2006 - 05:11 AM
The planned sail was for monday but Jay got spooked by the US rudder cassettes failing in light air. An anchor was sourced in case Panthera suffered the same fate. In any case it was pretty breezy easterlies, still 18-20kts at midday and top gust 31kts. Sail abandoned and work started on a beefed up stainless cassette. IMHO the top gudgeon could have had a higher mounting block to improve the ratio of pintle separation to rudder length, cut down the stressing a little.
Be interesting to know what the true costs are once the boats are beefed up to sailing standard??
#135
Posted 08 November 2006 - 06:50 AM
IMHO the top gudgeon could have had a higher mounting block to improve the ratio of pintle separation to rudder length, cut down the stressing a little.
That was my thoughts as well when I saw the boat and how freekin huge the rudder is. It stands to reason there is going to be massive loads to hold that lever arm. Seperation of the pintles would have helped.
#136
Posted 14 November 2006 - 02:45 AM
ft10rudder.jpg 24.52K
126 downloads Mk3 dwgWill get a pic to prove it up when I can. (edit)
#137
Posted 14 November 2006 - 05:25 AM
Cazza
(I wonder if this makes me a groupie too)
#138
Posted 14 November 2006 - 05:52 AM
Refresh us, Frakka, on what you were unable to take a picture of. Is this the 'beefed up stainless cassette" you mentioned a couple days back?
DMM,
If I thought you were being facetious I would reply; What part of these sentences and diagram dont you understand ? .
But I dont think that is the case and the answer is; yes.
Cazza
(I wonder if this makes me a "groupie" too)
Thanks for the civilised reply, the term is Accredited Reporter
You guys should appreciate the interest from supportive non-owners. New members of the FT fleet may come from these people.
#139
Posted 14 November 2006 - 06:01 AM
Please, keep sending your reports, we need a picture of panthera sailing. And thanks for the info you've sent so far!
Cazza
#140
Posted 14 November 2006 - 06:37 AM
Went to take a pic but flat battery. Anyhow this is the solution a-la-oz:
Will get a pic to prove it happened today.
Are these glassed into the original cassette? or are they joined together externally?
#141
Posted 14 November 2006 - 10:40 PM
Are these glassed into the original cassette? or are they joined together externally?
Sure both would improve the original flawed design
#142
Posted 15 November 2006 - 02:07 AM
Sure both would improve the original flawed design
According to Ben in another thread, it is the layup and not the design that is flawed.
#143
Posted 15 November 2006 - 02:11 PM
DSCN0065.JPG 101.21K
137 downloadsbottom
DSCN0066.JPG 87.22K
99 downloads
#144
Posted 15 November 2006 - 02:17 PM
#145
Posted 15 November 2006 - 02:24 PM
how do you remove the rudder now ?
unbolt it ?
#146
Posted 15 November 2006 - 02:27 PM
DSCN0071.JPG 88.75K
68 downloadsTop, very raw state, note welds on collars.
DSCN0072.JPG 83.73K
74 downloads
#147
Posted 15 November 2006 - 02:34 PM
dumb question time
Certainly is, if you let me finish you would have spotted the self locking bolt.
#148
Posted 15 November 2006 - 02:37 PM
#149
Posted 15 November 2006 - 02:55 PM
not the Nyloc ............
not only do you butt in, you can't read either; "Raw State".
And I have not finished as yet.
#150
Posted 15 November 2006 - 03:08 PM
not only do you butt in, you can't read either; "Raw State".
And I have not finished as yet.
well excuse me .........
touchy
#151
Posted 15 November 2006 - 03:31 PM
DSCN0073.JPG 111.82K
112 downloadsFrom another thread:
This boat was delivered as shown, the 20c piece is 28mm, the holes 33mm apart. Good control for a deck sweeper, infinite control for an elevated clew. Cars need not be an issue for OD, stipulate track size and position and stay silent on the cars, several classes do.
#152
Posted 15 November 2006 - 03:36 PM
well excuse me .........
touchy
Just kidding.
#153
Posted 15 November 2006 - 05:00 PM
#154
Posted 16 November 2006 - 12:41 AM
Nice work Jaymac. Good reporting too groupie.
#155
Posted 16 November 2006 - 01:06 AM
Bottom, note extra bolt(s) + internal backing plate (believe me).
DSCN0071.JPG 88.75K 68 downloads
Top, very raw state, note welds on collars.DSCN0072.JPG 83.73K 74 downloads
That a fine piece of work, well done.
#156
Posted 16 November 2006 - 02:29 AM
Bottom, note extra bolt(s) + internal backing plate (believe me).
What, there was no backing plate behind the gudgeons ?
#157
Posted 16 November 2006 - 03:41 AM
#158
Posted 16 November 2006 - 01:52 PM
the bitching about the boats on other threads is just crap - if you aren't happy with a bolt / a backing plate or other small part of how things are finished how hard is it to buy a good quality replacement and fit it your self? just as Jaymac has been doing. get over it - it is a ~ $55K boat if you don't want to have to fix a few minor problems then they will become $90-120K boats very quickly and this defeats the main attraction of the boat - the price.
#159
Posted 16 November 2006 - 02:17 PM
#160
Posted 16 November 2006 - 04:58 PM
Its good to see that while the bitching and hand wringing about this problem continues in other threads, Jaymac is quietly going ahead with sorting the problem without (physical) support from the yard or other owners.
Nice work Jaymac. Good reporting too groupie.
I would not say that this is done in isolation. The owners are in close communications exchanging information & tips. JM was informed of the cassette failures within 4 hrs of happening. We take care of our lot....
A great deal of communications goes on behind the scenes.
Clew
#161
Posted 17 November 2006 - 05:22 AM
We take care of our lot....
A great deal... goes on behind the scenes.
Clew
You mean like the KKK or mafia........? (sharp intake of breath).
#162
Posted 23 November 2006 - 11:26 PM
Obviously hasn't started in any Saturday or Wednesday races - I realise there's been problems,
when will she have her first start??? - just curious to see how she performs
#163
Posted 24 November 2006 - 01:30 PM
Panthera has been here for almost a month now and have been checking out Royal Perth results
Obviously hasn't started in any Saturday or Wednesday races - I realise there's been problems,
when will she have her first start??? - just curious to see how she performs
Sorry guys, been away on the Adelaide Classic car rally, and the wind surfung season has been hooking in well.
Going for a sail at RPYC on Sat Morn around 11 if anyone wants to join welcome. First race will be on Wednesday next week.
#164
Posted 24 November 2006 - 02:58 PM
Sorry guys, been away on the Adelaide Classic car rally, and the wind surfung season has been hooking in well.
Going for a sail at RPYC on Sat Morn around 11 if anyone wants to join welcome. First race will be on Wednesday next week.
Good luck with ole hull # 12, that was my original hull # for a long time so I feel some attachment to it. Since it would not have been delivered until after our sailing season ended I swapped out to #39 coming next spring (our spring your fall) so it all worked out for the good.. Scott
#165
Posted 25 November 2006 - 04:32 AM
SENCE OF HUMOR!
THIS LITTLE "BUGGER", SMALLEST THING I EVER BUILT IN MY LIFE!
BUGS DISSAPPEARING FAST AS WE TALK.
IMPORTANT THING, "BOB AND BEN HAVE CREATED ONE HELL OF A YACHT"
NOW WE GOTTA BUILDEM!
WILL DO!
ENJOY!
NUFF SAID
P.S. HOW MANY OF YOU ASSHOLE'S HAVE FATHERS WHO WERE SKIPPERS WITH ME IN THE WENT INDIES? TIME TO STAND UP AND BE COUNTED.
#166
Posted 28 November 2006 - 06:52 AM
#167
Posted 28 November 2006 - 01:50 PM
Maybe one or two jobs to tidy up before some serious racing, but the rudder cassette now looks robust enough. Hope the Outhaul fix works out OK and whatever the plan is for the forward stanchions?
Other than that, she looked used, mildly abused and very happy with herself. Good to see the locals getting on with fixing up what is a hell of a boat (bang for buck) and keeping the whinging to a minimum. If I can change my flight to Kalgoorlie tomorrow I might come down to see her in action.
Keep up the good work guys
#168
Posted 28 November 2006 - 04:20 PM
#169
Posted 29 November 2006 - 05:33 AM
I beleive she is having here first race today and practice sail was on Saturday.
I still have not got to Perth to see it. My father was in Perth last week and went down and saw Jay. Dad discribed it as a moden day Adams 10 with a cabin?
Look forward to hear how Jay goes.
Strobe
No77 or sooner please
#170
Posted 29 November 2006 - 02:07 PM
In general the boat is a beautifully designed toy. The hull is bigger than I expected from the drawings with higher freeboard. The cabin top is less intrusive and blends in well. Down below the space is large and the fibreglass work is excellent especially the detailed, accurate, light construction of each floor board. The Mast combines flexibilty with strength and the rigging is strong and robust. The supplied sails are totally adequate, and the kite is a really special sail that has lots of fun potential.
At the end of the day we had a Mumm 30 with tired sails a few minutes behind us, an Adams 10 just infront, and the Foundation 36s well spaced out futher in front. We put in this performance for the basis of our new handicap, and we were just that happy nothing fell off.
I am not sure if it will take a month or so for me to get this boat to sail right ...or if it might take a month or so for this boat to teach me to sail it right! but we either way we are going to have a lot of fun.
Thanks Bob for a great design..Jaymac
#171
Posted 29 November 2006 - 04:17 PM
Nothing that attention to backstay tension, mast prebend, and outhaul won't fix. Helm felt too neutral, maybe not enough mast rake, but more likely too much forward rake on the rudder and a little over balanced, cannot really tell without the big headsail up.
Sounds like a great shakedown race! Question regarding pre-bend if I remember correctly the spreaders are fixed so with fixed spreaders and a fixed mast step how are you going to adequately adjust prebend? Also in 25kts you went for the storm jib, were you underpowered going to weather or? Finally I assume you didn't put reef points in the main, will the backstay (once it is fixed) be enough to depower the main?
#172
Posted 29 November 2006 - 04:22 PM
#173
Posted 29 November 2006 - 06:11 PM
thanks for the update. I find it hard to imagine the boat feeling underpowered in 25 knots even with the small jib but I'll take your word on it. I agree that the helm feels very light. I kind of like that but it may not be the fastest way to sail. I don't think toying withthe rudder blade will have much effect on the feel. I think you are going to have to adjust mast rake to dial in more helm. But, this is a narrow boat and helm may be hard to find. Adjusting the rake of the rudder blade in the casette may give you more feel while not upsetting the overall balance of the boat. I particularily liked the solid feel of the boat, no creaks, cracks and groans while sailing, except my back.
When you have time keep us updated on your performance please.
#174
Posted 29 November 2006 - 06:51 PM
Flushdeck or cabin?
Whats its name,so I can follow the results?
#175
Posted 29 November 2006 - 07:49 PM
#176
Posted 29 November 2006 - 09:40 PM
I figured that would get your attention Phil :-)Jaymac,what sort of Adams10?
Flushdeck or cabin?
Whats its name,so I can follow the results?
It certainly got mine.
Early days though.
#177
Posted 30 November 2006 - 08:08 PM
It should be a good comparison,given the A10s no longer considered a light weight.A better one of course would be a Hick30,ala Very Tasty.I figured that would get your attention Phil :-)
It certainly got mine.
Early days though.
#178
Posted 01 December 2006 - 03:02 AM
swept back rig...Question regarding pre-bend if I remember correctly the spreaders are fixed so with fixed spreaders and a fixed mast step how are you going to adequately adjust prebend? ...
Pre-bend will come purely from upper shroud tensions when tuning the rig
. .and then you break the spreaders when the midmast wants to go forward. boathouse is on the money here.
i'm with EWS
The fixed spreaders will produce (inherent) pre-bend if they have any 'Poke' at all. It's just a matter of how much you 'dial out' (diminish it) with the d1 d2 tension.
#179
Posted 01 December 2006 - 05:35 AM
Results_for_29_11_2006_PM.htm 20.86K
70 downloadsWednesday Arfo Racing (Im from another club but think I have the boats correct)Jaymac,what sort of Adams10?
Flushdeck or cabin?
Whats its name,so I can follow the results?
R6 - Foundation 36
By & Large - Foundation 36
Team Saab - Foundation 36
Men Behaving Badly - Adams 10 (with cabin)
Fleur De Lys - Swarbrick 97
AUS 12 - Panthera **
R8 - Not sure - guessing new Bakewell White 8
Red Fever - Mumm 30 (dont know what he's doing back there)
The Croc - Etchells
Farrari - Farr 9.2
Farrfetched - Farr 9.2
#180
Posted 01 December 2006 - 05:44 AM
#181
Posted 01 December 2006 - 06:00 AM
Red Fever - Mumm 30 (dont know what he's doing back there)
I can assure you the Mumm doesn't get sailed to potential
#182
Posted 01 December 2006 - 08:51 AM
#183
Posted 04 December 2006 - 08:55 AM
I could be wrong but I thought Men Behaving Badly is a flush deck Adams 10?
Yea - saw it Saturday - is a flush deck - my mistake
#184
Posted 13 December 2006 - 10:22 PM
So we sailed on past the top mark and then set the big one for a ride downhill.
Once we got it up she was stable and fast, with occaisional, slight nose dives, that should have been corrected by easing the sheet, and bringing weight aft.
We cruised down river with a fair bit of foil hum and 15kts showing on a slow speedo. I felt that we could still use more power.
Pulled on the mainsheet a little bit and she rounded up in a big broach, lay over with the kite flogging for a minute or two until a bit of mainsheet gave a enough water flow over the rudder to sail back downwind again.
The Good news, The mast is fantastic, despite all the banging and flogging around it stayed firm and solid and gives the impression that it can take a lot more power. The pole too is also strong without undue bend. The Asymetrical Kite is a beautiful sail, sets high with big broard shoulders and has lots of grunt. The hull handled it all very well, proving that the Tiger is a lot more than just a pretty boat with top quality fibreglass work.
Systems look good for the next downwinder in a real breeze, will get some photos too.
Jaymac
#185
Posted 13 December 2006 - 11:40 PM
That Adams sailed well today, in a 25kt seabreeze, left us for dead up wind without a properly designed No 3.
So we sailed on past the top mark and then set the big one for a ride downhill.
Once we got it up she was stable and fast, with occaisional, slight nose dives, that should have been corrected by easing the sheet, and bringing weight aft.
We cruised down river with a fair bit of foil hum and 15kts showing on a slow speedo. I felt that we could still use more power.
Pulled on the mainsheet a little bit and she rounded up in a big broach, lay over with the kite flogging for a minute or two until a bit of mainsheet gave a enough water flow over the rudder to sail back downwind again.
The Good news, The mast is fantastic, despite all the banging and flogging around it stayed firm and solid and gives the impression that it can take a lot more power. The pole too is also strong without undue bend. The Asymetrical Kite is a beautiful sail, sets high with big broard shoulders and has lots of grunt. The hull handled it all very well, proving that the Tiger is a lot more than just a pretty boat with top quality fibreglass work.
Systems look good for the next downwinder in a real breeze, will get some photos too.
Jaymac
Well that was a fun read.
#186
Posted 14 December 2006 - 04:00 AM
That Adams sailed well today, in a 25kt seabreeze, left us for dead up wind without a properly designed No 3.
So we sailed on past the top mark and then set the big one for a ride downhill.
Once we got it up she was stable and fast, with occaisional, slight nose dives, that should have been corrected by easing the sheet, and bringing weight aft.
We cruised down river with a fair bit of foil hum and 15kts showing on a slow speedo. I felt that we could still use more power.
Pulled on the mainsheet a little bit and she rounded up in a big broach, lay over with the kite flogging for a minute or two until a bit of mainsheet gave a enough water flow over the rudder to sail back downwind again.
The Good news, The mast is fantastic, despite all the banging and flogging around it stayed firm and solid and gives the impression that it can take a lot more power. The pole too is also strong without undue bend. The Asymetrical Kite is a beautiful sail, sets high with big broard shoulders and has lots of grunt. The hull handled it all very well, proving that the Tiger is a lot more than just a pretty boat with top quality fibreglass work.
Systems look good for the next downwinder in a real breeze, will get some photos too.
Jaymac
And not even a passing comment about the rudder cassette.... sorted. Assume the boom end outhaul block fitting is fixed and working well and what was the reason for taking out the forward stancions? Full main OK in 25 knots?
#187
Posted 14 December 2006 - 08:18 AM
left us for dead up wind without a properly designed No 3.
Asked Phil about the Adams/FT thing, he didn't hold back on the FT's rags, very editor-like.
and 15kts showing on a slow speedo.
Don't I recall from the polars, 12kts in 20kts at 135 degrees true. The rhumb line from Brickies to Outer Dolphin in a seabreeze is pretty close to 135 degrees and 15kts in 25kts seems to bear out the predictions, no ?..........
Jay,
Give me a call for the photo shoot, assume it'll be a wednesday ?, and calibrate the speedo !!!.
Frakka.
#188
Posted 14 December 2006 - 09:28 AM
#189
Posted 14 December 2006 - 11:56 AM
Same as comparing a Mumm 30 to an A10,although the M and the FT have a cabin .But you know what I mean[I hope].
#190
Posted 14 December 2006 - 01:35 PM
#191
Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:19 PM
Nearly a year ago several of us Aussies urged the class association to allow some kind of heavy weather headsail due to the conditions that we experience on a routine basis.The mumm and the A10(presumably) have a #4 for such conditions. Adding a FT#4 would help handicap racing in a breeze and in OD nobody gets to use it anyway.
At least in Perth/Freemantle and Hobart 15-20 knots is routine, not exceptional - and 20+ is not at all unusual. Sydney and Melbourne see the same conditions although perhaps less frequently (Phil?)
In my opinion it is a sail longevity and safety issue and both concerns apply just as much to OD racing as they do to handicap races. Not having a smaller, heavier jib in Australia means sailing very overpowered on a regular basis and reducing the life expectancy of the class headsail. I'd rather race with a sail that is appropriate to the conditions than wrestle with the boat and spend unnecessary $ on short lived sails.
It may be that FT10 owners in Oz need to make a national change to the OD spec to allow a second heavy weather jib. It would be better if the global owners association recognised that this is a real issue for many FT10 owners and allowed a class jib for heavy conditions. If the Owners asociation or Hiptrader don't like either of these ideas then perhaps we need to organise an Australian Owners Association as a separate entity to the US based group with it's own rules.
Sparky
FT10 #54
#192
Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:58 PM
given that it is still on the table , who knows
wtf is OD anyway, ppl are fairing in keel junctions aren't they ??
#193
Posted 14 December 2006 - 04:12 PM
In 25+, do you think you will go with a heavier cloth, flatter cut jib or go down in sail area? My concern is if the jib SA goes down by much, you may start an unbalanced sail plan....
Unfortunately, we have only sail it to the high teens, so we cannot really tell.
Jay -- is the mast tip falling off nicely to spill some air automatically?
Clew
#194
Posted 14 December 2006 - 04:29 PM
#195
Posted 14 December 2006 - 04:44 PM
Here you can see the difference between the m32's
Melges 32 standard jib SA = 230sf , #4 = 134sf
Attached Files
#196
Posted 14 December 2006 - 06:54 PM
I personally think it's the way to go (2 jibs). I also believe that the sail should be less in SA. For those in the US say So Cal for example we will use the standard jib 95% of the time and will have a relatively fresh #4 that spends most of it's life in the bag but available if needed. For those in AUS / San Fran etc......the percentages may be flipped. As long as the purchase limits are reasonable the sail that is used at the lesser pecentage would be a sail that doesn't need replacement annually and could possibly be stretched 3-4 years depending on material. I think the proper #4 would be smaller in SA with a short luff and strop to make up the difference to lower the center of effort of the jib area ala Melges 32's and Mumm 30's.
Here you can see the difference between the m32's
Melges 32 standard jib SA = 230sf , #4 = 134sf
I wonder how that would work with this style furler. Maybe you could get horizontal battens (or no battens) and just drop the thing at the top mark. Hey then you could frac it.
#197
Posted 14 December 2006 - 07:09 PM
#198
Posted 14 December 2006 - 07:50 PM
Nearly a year ago several of us Aussies urged the class association to allow some kind of heavy weather headsail due to the conditions that we experience on a routine basis.
..........
It may be that FT10 owners in Oz need to make a national change to the OD spec to allow a second heavy weather jib. It would be better if the global owners association recognised that this is a real issue for many FT10 owners and allowed a class jib for heavy conditions. If the Owners asociation or Hiptrader don't like either of these ideas then perhaps we need to organise an Australian Owners Association as a separate entity to the US based group with it's own rules.
I thought the association agreed to allow a smaller jib for heavy weather, and it didn't count against the class inventory? Or was I mistaken?
#199
Posted 14 December 2006 - 07:51 PM
#200
Posted 14 December 2006 - 08:25 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












