Keel of USA-87
#1
Posted 30 June 2006 - 10:59 AM
Can anyone make something out of the photo? If you tweak colors with Photoshop you get a clearer picture
http://photos1.blogg.../DSC_6318.0.jpg
#2
Posted 30 June 2006 - 11:04 AM
#6
Posted 30 June 2006 - 12:41 PM
deffinately only a single keel strut attatched to the bulb, not a tandem keel at all, ill upload the pic and post a link
so no one thinks that the hazy white outline in line with the mast is a second foil?
#7
Posted 30 June 2006 - 12:50 PM
#8
Posted 30 June 2006 - 01:21 PM
Stupid AC - it is as exciting as watching grass grow
Yes, I do like watching that grass, it is quite exciting when there are lots of buds. Do you use hydroponics>?
#9
Posted 30 June 2006 - 02:14 PM
#10
Posted 30 June 2006 - 02:22 PM
Stupid AC - it is as exciting as watching grass grow
Yep. Over it. Booooring
#11
Posted 30 June 2006 - 11:52 PM
#12
Posted 01 July 2006 - 12:09 AM
Front page pic is much higher res.
Not really much of note there, longish bulb but I don't find that particularly surprising.
#13
Posted 01 July 2006 - 12:41 AM
Attached Files
#14
Posted 01 July 2006 - 12:44 AM
is it the chase boat or something else more freaky dicky?
AH its a scupper to drain the water. Look at the Soling or Star boats.
#16
Posted 01 July 2006 - 01:05 AM
#17
Posted 01 July 2006 - 01:17 AM
#18
Posted 01 July 2006 - 04:41 PM
#19
Posted 01 July 2006 - 04:46 PM
#20
Posted 01 July 2006 - 05:21 PM
Somehow no-one else can see mickey mouse???
mickey_fn_mouse.jpg 150.97K 767 downloads
it looks like mickey mouse in scuba diving gear
#21
Posted 04 July 2006 - 01:21 PM
Back on topic - surely it would just be easier to use a polarising filter on the camera in the first place - instead of fiddling about with it electronically afterwards?
#22
Posted 04 July 2006 - 03:11 PM
Back on topic - surely it would just be easier to use a polarising filter on the camera in the first place - instead of fiddling about with it electronically afterwards?
photoshop is alot cheaper then a plane ticket to Spain
#23
Posted 04 July 2006 - 03:22 PM
Back on topic - surely it would just be easier to use a polarising filter on the camera in the first place - instead of fiddling about with it electronically afterwards?
photoshop is alot cheaper then a plane ticket to Spain
London - Valencia return - £130
Photoshop - £472
but AC sends me into a coma ,so i will not be bothering!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













