Target market
#1
Posted 11 December 2008 - 04:50 PM
Have all the builders given up on the bottom end, is the starter boat dead? With no or few small pocket cruisers buing built will the used market dry up for affordable small boats?
#2
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:05 PM
I was driving home last night thinking of the same thing.
I have long had an idea for a 21' pocket cruiser. It is pretty much worked out in my head in terms of hull and deck.
I know you have the huge and beautiful C&C but that's not even on the horizon for most of us.
But damn it. Just getting out there and putting along from harbor to harbor is sure fun. And I find that the more shit I remove from the process the more I like it. If you don't have it, it can't break down.
Maybe its time for the WLYDO to tackle a pocket cruiser.
#3
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:13 PM
After the 32er, certainly!Joli:
I was driving home last night thinking of the same thing.
I have long had an idea for a 21' pocket cruiser. It is pretty much worked out in my head in terms of hull and deck.
I know you have the huge and beautiful C&C but that's not even on the horizon for most of us.
But damn it. Just getting out there and putting along from harbor to harbor is sure fun. And I find that the more shit I remove from the process the more I like it. If you don't have it, it can't break down.
Maybe its time for the WLYDO to tackle a pocket cruiser.
Joli,
I think that other builders have given up on the market which Catalina and Hunter have sewn up. It is a similar business model as Walmart, price point! KMart lost that battle and are now a Sears hybrid. Target took a different take on the same demographic, but expanded it up, and chose to up quality and product levels while still hitting price points.
I think the only builder today who seems to be willing to test demographics is JBoats. Look at the depth of their line in terms of designed use. Granted they are utilitarian and not the most beautiful boats out there, but the brand recognition is there when you see one in a harbour or out sailing. It would be interesting to see if Tiger Boat Works would be willing to try a cruising brand. They already have a production facility, just change some of the focus on the build and fitting and you could go with low cost budget cruisers.
Just some ramblings...
Will Museler
#4
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:15 PM
As for getting out there and putting along, that's about what we do in a relatively fancy 40'er.
#5
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:18 PM
In today's market place our 33 is almost a pocket cruiser!!
#6
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:22 PM
maybe the reason they don't target the bottom end is because yesterday's top end boat is tomorrow's bottom end starter. I'm so sick of the new manufacturing and the advert-articles that tell us that "50' is the new 40'" No it isn't. As Bob points out, simple solutions mean fewer chances for stuff to break. Go to the boat shows and go on a the new Hunter 50 I think is, with almost no aft cabin but it has an f'ing whirlpool. WTF?? If people want low-cost starter boats, they go out and buy a used Catalina, Hunter, Beneteau, or if they like quality builds then an original Tartan, Pearson, Freedom or something.
#7
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:29 PM
I look around our harbour and see boats from a forgotten era...Siren 17, CS 22, Sirius 21, Matilda 20...and the BIG boats that made all the commotion when the arrived in the 80's, the Tanzer 26 and the VERY luxurious CS27
In today's market place our 33 is almost a pocket cruiser!!
Matilda 20? Looked at one once. Neat boat. On further research I discovered it had a big sister, the Matilda 23. The 23 looks like it has all the accommodation of a 30 footer and would be capable of some extended cruising. Can we make one like this but modern & fast?


http://www.matildaow...3/gallery23.htm
#8
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:37 PM
#9
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:38 PM
When you arrived somewhere, it felt like you had really achieved something
After the Snapdragon, we cruised for a year in a Westerly Cirrus 22ft with a 10hp volvo diesel, iron keel. Despite its boxy look, it was comfortable below and sailed very well on all points. Finally a cruising boat that pointed well to windward
#10
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:46 PM
I'm thinking:
All waterline
Chines ( for fun) and stability
Plenty of beam
Raised foredeck
Big cockpit
Outboard
Portapotty ( I guess)
Plenty of draft ( of course)
Nice big rig
Outboard rudder
Two berths ( one big berth)
This could very well be our Christmas present to the office.
Something to do over those long, dark nights.
#11
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:52 PM
Nice start. I am thinking of a Gary Mull Pocket Rocket hull but with the chines, maybe blend in a Lindenberg 22 hull. One big berth, raised bulb keel for trailering/gunkholing. Pop top cabin?Things start to heat up.
I'm thinking:
All waterline
Chines ( for fun) and stability
Plenty of beam
Raised foredeck
Big cockpit
Outboard
Portapotty ( I guess)
Plenty of draft ( of course)
Nice big rig
Outboard rudder
Two berths ( one big berth)
This could very well be our Christmas present to the office.
Something to do over those long, dark nights.
#12
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:01 PM

Surfing the web recently, I came across the test report of a 42-foot motor yacht. The accompanying pictures showed an interior more sumptuous than anything I've lived in. The writer allowed it was indeed luxurious, but opined that other parts of the yacht adhered to "the minimalist school." Reading down further I found the price: $454,000. Minimalist indeed! In my opinion, the words "forty-two foot yacht" and "minimalist" have no business in the same sentence. It strikes me as similar to associating Atilla the Hun with a philanthropic group. A 14-foot mini-cruiser is minimalist. A 19 is comfortable, and anything much larger than a 25 borders on ostentatious.
News and reviews with heavy emphasis on pocket cruisers and minimalist cruising, usually on super-low budgets. Some of their technical contributors are kind of naive though.
#13
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:02 PM
Things start to heat up.
I'm thinking:
All waterline - check
Chines ( for fun) and stability - check (could make it an easier home build too)
Plenty of beam - check
Raised foredeck - check
Big cockpit - check (big enough to also sleep on deck with a boom tent)
Outboard - check
Portapotty ( I guess) - check
Plenty of draft ( of course) - check (dagger board?)
Nice big rig - check - swept single spreader, no backstay, flat top, fractional, assy, retractable sprit
Outboard rudder - check (in a cassette)
Two berths ( one big berth) - check
Galley - a gimbaled stove or even a single, gimbaled "Camping Gaz" like some mini transats.
This could very well be our Christmas present to the office.
Something to do over those long, dark nights.
#14
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:03 PM
My wife and I sometimes toy with the idea of getting a trawler, renting another slip, and forgetting about having a house.
Even if I could afford a new one, even very big trawlers are layed out for 2 people and thus useless to us. I was wondering how long builders could concentrate on the retired millionaire market and ignore everything else. We may soon find out
#15
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:09 PM
even very big trawlers are layed out for 2 people and thus useless to us.
Why useless??
Most boats have too many berths for their enclosed volume, imho.
#16
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:33 PM
Most boats have too many berths for their enclosed volume, imho.
Agreed...we have kept our boats so they will be comfortable for 4 adults, yet we have NEVER had another couple cruise with us. Our friends have their own boats.
Give me a comfortable sleep cabin (fore or aft) and a convertable settee...and put the remaining space to more practical use.
#17
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:47 PM
That sums up my philosophy perfectly.And I find that the more shit I remove from the process the more I like it.
If you don't have it, it can't break down.
And you can't leave it all behind if you take it all with you.
#18
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:50 PM
#19
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:51 PM
As for why all the big boats the only ones in the mags? Follow the money.
Little boats have little margins, big boats have big(ger) margins. Those one page ads cost multiple thousands every month per magazine. I've even heard up to $20K quoted. (found it hard to believe, but ...fwiw) Know any little boat builders with that kind of dough to put out every month on ads?
Pogen, that was going to be my suggestion as well. I find that its the one magazine these days that I'll pick up without thumbing through first, oh, and Wooden Boat. Your obs on their technical writers are very valid. Guess they don't pay authors much other than the warm fuzzy feeling of 'being in print'.
#20
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:55 PM
Joli:
I was driving home last night thinking of the same thing.
I have long had an idea for a 21' pocket cruiser. It is pretty much worked out in my head in terms of hull and deck.
I know you have the huge and beautiful C&C but that's not even on the horizon for most of us.
But damn it. Just getting out there and putting along from harbor to harbor is sure fun. And I find that the more shit I remove from the process the more I like it. If you don't have it, it can't break down.
Maybe its time for the WLYDO to tackle a pocket cruiser.
Pocket Cruiser Bob? Don't let Frank know, he thinks the market is sewn up.
Damned tough to sell people on a sport being "affordable" when they go to boat shows and see nothing but boats that cost more than a house.
It's a pretty big hole in the market now - if you want a < 30 feet knockabout weekender or boat a couple can spend a week on without killing each other there is very little new available. At least in something that is well built, affordable and can actually get out of it's own way under sail.
The question is - can the target demographic for a new sub $100K (or sub $50K) boat - which would be younger families & couples and people of more modest means - really afford it anyway? Or are they still better off looking for a 20+ year old Pearson?
The other question is can you sell something spare in a market where new houses are being built with more bathrooms than bedrooms?
#21
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:57 PM
When you spend the big bucks for a 'nice' boat, you often hope to have some friends join you for a cruise. Doesn't happen much, most friends that would join you either aren't attuned to boats and all or have their own boat. Might be nice to have an extra hand or two for an offshore passage though. The ole how many does it sleep issue now is really only a sign of a neophyte or a charter customer.
As for why all the big boats the only ones in the mags? Follow the money.
Little boats have little margins, big boats have big(ger) margins. Those one page ads cost multiple thousands every month per magazine. I've even heard up to $20K quoted. (found it hard to believe, but ...fwiw) Know any little boat builders with that kind of dough to put out every month on ads?
Pogen, that was going to be my suggestion as well. I find that its the one magazine these days that I'll pick up without thumbing through first, oh, and Wooden Boat. Your obs on their technical writers are very valid. Guess they don't pay authors much other than the warm fuzzy feeling of 'being in print'.
We've done friends and family on more than a few occasions on our boat. Took my parents to the Vineyard with us for ten days last summer, cousins to Block for a weekend, my grandfather to Cutty hunk, my father-in-law & his girlfriend for a couple of weekends, kids friends over night, etc.
It is true though that it never happens as much as you would expect or like - the number of standing invitations we have open to friends and family for a weekend off on the boat outstrips the available weekends, yet only a couple happen every year.
#22
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:58 PM
It consumes them!! They've become 12v junkies!!
#23
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:59 PM
The older group that cruise at our club have become slaves to the 12v refrigerator!!
It consumes them!! They've become 12v junkies!!
Amateurs. 24V is the new 12.
#24
Posted 11 December 2008 - 07:00 PM
Next thing you'll be saying 50Hz is the new 60Hz!The older group that cruise at our club have become slaves to the 12v refrigerator!!
It consumes them!! They've become 12v junkies!!
Amateurs. 24V is the new 12.
#25
Posted 11 December 2008 - 07:06 PM
Actually even for a weeken they are better for families. I can't stand the powerboat mentality of huge "rooms" to make the wife feel like it is a condo and no f'n storage anyplace.
even very big trawlers are layed out for 2 people and thus useless to us.
Why useless??
Most boats have too many berths for their enclosed volume, imho.
#26
Posted 11 December 2008 - 07:09 PM
Actually 120 volts DC can be the new 60 Hz. When you have a battery bank that push 500 to 1,000 amps when shorted at 120 volts THEN you know you can really burn some shit down
Next thing you'll be saying 50Hz is the new 60Hz!The older group that cruise at our club have become slaves to the 12v refrigerator!!
It consumes them!! They've become 12v junkies!!
Amateurs. 24V is the new 12.
#27
Posted 11 December 2008 - 07:16 PM
400 Hz is the new 60 Hz. 50 Hz is for euro-weenies who forget who invented light bulbs in the first place!
Actually 120 volts DC can be the new 60 Hz. When you have a battery bank that push 500 to 1,000 amps when shorted at 120 volts THEN you know you can really burn some shit down
Next thing you'll be saying 50Hz is the new 60Hz!The older group that cruise at our club have become slaves to the 12v refrigerator!!
It consumes them!! They've become 12v junkies!!
Amateurs. 24V is the new 12.![]()
Frederick: It's not enough. More! More, do you hear me? Throw the third switch!
IGOR: (throwing the switch) Wait till he sees the bill.
#28
Posted 11 December 2008 - 07:31 PM
I was simply echoing the "keep it simple" sentiment.
#29
Posted 11 December 2008 - 07:45 PM
Things start to heat up.
I'm thinking:
All waterline
Chines ( for fun) and stability
Plenty of beam
Raised foredeck
Big cockpit
Outboard
Portapotty ( I guess)
Plenty of draft ( of course)
Nice big rig
Outboard rudder
Two berths ( one big berth)
This could very well be our Christmas present to the office.
Something to do over those long, dark nights.
My favorite little boat of all time:
John Guzzwell design "Dolly"
About small boats, it's simple. First off, let me say that I don't hate rich people, am only a quazi-socialist, and don't blame all of the boomers' for the complete book of ills of the world, but that said, marketing follows the $$$. Ads pump it up. Margins are bigger for bigger boats. What we're really seeing is symtomatic of the shift generational wealth. Most people in their late 20's through mid 40's these days can't even begin imagining having the extra cash for not only a new boat, but moorage, maintenance, etc.... particularly if they've got college funds going. It's my humble opinion that the boat industry is building 'Hummers' for a very limited market. As a kid, I remember a very large boat in the marina being 40-42'. Most were 25'-35' back when the middle class was healthy. I think it's high time for some very good small boats (well designed, beautiful, etc...) to be brought to market for young families or most of us who don't have $200,000+ to drop. The re-introduction of the S2 is an indication that others are thinking this way as well, i.e, better to be building something and keep busy even if the profits are thin. I see this as a tremendously positive trend that will help revive and expand the demographic base of the sport, so yup, let's do a pocket cruiser!!! There's just something right about it.
Attached Files
#30
Posted 11 December 2008 - 07:49 PM
#31
Posted 11 December 2008 - 07:56 PM
We're -trying- to hit that elusive first timer, simple, weekending sailboat market...

The Left Coast Dart
I donno' if its going to be a hit or not. But when we're done, at least I'll have one for myself.
-jim lee
#32
Posted 11 December 2008 - 08:07 PM
Oh, another interesting development it the resurgence of the Moore 24. Still a great boat that could probably be brought back into production Those currently sailing are possibly the most fun you can have for > $12,000 ~ $15,000 with your pants on!
#33
Posted 11 December 2008 - 08:10 PM
I tried racing a Rhodes Mariner for a few years with my club's PHRF fleet, so I have some strong ideas.
First, make it a two sleeper. The Mariner looked like it slept four, but all the berths were too small for an average man.
Second, be sure the head can be used without deconstructing the interior. It can be under some sort of cover, but not under a cushion, or ....
Third, if you really want to sell some boats, be sure you can get it onto a trailer.
Fourth, make it stiff enough that it can be sailed by two people. This will inevitably mean that those used to sailing Santana 20s and J-22s with bigger (harder working) crews will feel it doesn't have enough sail. Tell them to go back to the boats they prefer.
Fifth, be generous with the cockpit.
Sixth, think about the OB very early in the game. Just sticking it on a bracket is not the best you can do.
#34
Posted 11 December 2008 - 08:11 PM
...snip
The question is - can the target demographic for a new sub $100K (or sub $50K) boat - which would be younger families & couples and people of more modest means - really afford it anyway? Or are they still better off looking for a 20+ year old Pearson?
The other question is can you sell something spare in a market where new houses are being built with more bathrooms than bedrooms?
I think that's the rub. Too many people wrapped up in the morebigger is morebetter mentality, so they "need" a bigger boat to satisfy their ego. It's a general mentality, at least in the US -- just look around at the houses people live in and the "cars" (SUV's) they drive.
Few people "need" a 40 ft boat any more than they "need" an Expedition to get groceries and shuttle the kids to soccer practice. Those who are "value conscious" buy used -- lots and lots to choose from. Fiberglass doesn't get old or wear out. The pieces parts do, but the hull doesn't, and new is (or at least feels like at the outset) lots more $. Whether they are truly "better off" is certainly debatable, as any of us working on a "fixer upper" can attest.
That said, I personally think that it is a great idea and a boat that size really would fill a needed niche.
#35
Posted 11 December 2008 - 08:16 PM
Well,
We're -trying- to hit that elusive first timer, simple, weekending sailboat market...
The Left Coast Dart
I donno' if its going to be a hit or not. But when we're done, at least I'll have one for myself.
-jim lee
Lief Bailey?....here we go.
#36
Posted 11 December 2008 - 08:21 PM
Looks like a slightly refined B 25. Which is a great boat that deserved greater success.Well,
We're -trying- to hit that elusive first timer, simple, weekending sailboat market...
-jim lee
Is this going into production?
#37
Posted 11 December 2008 - 08:23 PM
Well,
We're -trying- to hit that elusive first timer, simple, weekending sailboat market...
The Left Coast Dart
I donno' if its going to be a hit or not. But when we're done, at least I'll have one for myself.
-jim lee
Cool looking boat, but didn't Bob say "Cruiser"?
Am I the only one that doesn't want to crawl into a fast, wet, fiberglass coffin?
Can't something be made fast, light, and have enough room to stretch out in inside, without a cheesy poptop? What if you want to do some decent runs with the thing? Baha haha w/o the Baha Bash me thinking... Why not?
I remember a blog of a COUPLE that was cruising the Pacific in a Mini-Transat! Defiantly a pocket cruiser, but man would the old bones ache after that....
Give it some headroom!
#38
Posted 11 December 2008 - 08:23 PM
It probably is beyond the price point of a "starter" boat though.
http://www.themainsa...cle/mps/uan/186
#39
Posted 11 December 2008 - 08:26 PM
I don't look at those mags much anymore either. Though I met a guy that probably fit the current trend/target customer for those adds. He was recently retired - was renting the house next door to my parents short term rental, really nice guy. He told me he was looking for a nice sailboat to live on and just cruise around on. He settled on a Hylas. And he's sent my mom post cards from several places now when he found out I was an SF sailor he was all excited and talked about the days when he crewed on race boats etc.
He's loving life has a nice boat - has space for his grand kids to visit or friends to go on adventures with him etc.
#40
Posted 11 December 2008 - 08:26 PM
My wish list:
22'-24' "all waterline" as Bob said.
A decent cockpit for daysailing with friends but rigged for easy single handing.
"Sprightly" performance in light air with a fairly high SA/D, but able to handle a "blow" when reefed down.
Fractional rig.
Masthead asy downwind sails.
Traveller, adjustable (split) backstay, vang, and other tweakable sail controls.
2 single berths or one v-berth.
Stove, sink, ice chest.
Small oil heater or wood stove.
Outboard in a closed well a la a Thunderbird, or transom mounted. (A Torqueedo outboard with a large battery bank would be cool).
Simple instruments.
Small is good. There's too much of the Winnebago, bring everything with you mentality in boating these days. I like to sail, not fuss with systems.
The DArt looks cool.
Small Craft Advisor is a good mag. Another mag which features smaller boats is the British "Practical Boat Owner".
Joe
#41
Posted 11 December 2008 - 08:35 PM
Looks like a slightly refined B 25. Which is a great boat that deserved greater success.Well,
We're -trying- to hit that elusive first timer, simple, weekending sailboat market...
-jim lee
Is this going into production?
Well, that would be because the B25 was our starting point. I really liked B25s and thought that something along those lines would make a neat machine for boppin' around the islands up here. (PNW San Juans) Something simple, like a sailing tent camper. But something that was fun (for me) to sail. I met up with Leif and this is what we cooked up.
I wouldn't want to take it on the Baja Haha. Too small in my book.
Yes, its going into production, as we type.
And no, I've no idea what its going to cost. We're trying to keep it reasonable.
-jim lee
#42
Posted 11 December 2008 - 08:52 PM
I am thinking a 21' boat with good sitting headroom and nice big hatch so there's hearoom somewhere.
I am thinking something that looks a bit unique. Leif's boat looks like a hundred other nice boats.
I will not start with any other boat. I will start with a blank sheet of paper (computer monitor).
CA can go off on any tangent they like but I think I'll stick to my initial image for my pocket cruiser.
There's no point in playing this game if we are just going to regurgitate a slightly modified version of what is typical today. That's not the way the WLYDO does it.
Is it?
I want to create something that does not exist now.
Just for the hell of it, imagine a hybrid between Leif's design and that thing on the cover of Small Craft Advisor posted earler.
#43
Posted 11 December 2008 - 08:54 PM
There are still lots of them around the world doing just that.

#44
Posted 11 December 2008 - 09:04 PM
I love the Folkboat but I want something new.
I am starting a set of lines today.
#45
Posted 11 December 2008 - 09:06 PM
Nice boat and I wish you the best with it but it's not at all what I have in mind.
I am thinking a 21' boat with good sitting headroom and nice big hatch so there's hearoom somewhere.
I am thinking something that looks a bit unique. Leif's boat looks like a hundred other nice boats.
I will not start with any other boat. I will start with a blank sheet of paper (computer monitor).
CA can go off on any tangent they like but I think I'll stick to my initial image for my pocket cruiser.
There's no point in playing this game if we are just going to regurgitate a slightly modified version of what is typical today. That's not the way the WLYDO does it.
Is it?
I want to create something that does not exist now.
Just for the hell of it, imagine a hybrid between Leif's design and that thing on the cover of Small Craft Advisor posted earler.
I agree Bob, it should be unique to your vision and the WLYDO. That said (and I hate to bring up another design) are you thinking of a 21st century Stone Horse equivilent?
Joe
#46
Posted 11 December 2008 - 09:15 PM
In a word, yes.
The raised deck is what we need for cruising volume and good sitting headroom We may need/want a small cabin trunk ( maybe just a really long raised companionway hatch) but it can be low and trim if we have sitting headroom under the side deck and with a raised deck design there is NO side deck. I just want that basic configuration marrieed to a thoroughly modern hull form. We cannot give away an inch of sailing length and we need stability so we have some flexibility with the keel.
#47
Posted 11 December 2008 - 09:25 PM
#48
Posted 11 December 2008 - 09:28 PM
#49
Posted 11 December 2008 - 09:42 PM
I'm surprised no one mentioned easy trailering the boat as a requirement.
..cause we all know where that leads. Water ballast, swing keels, etc etc...
Easy trailering is better addressed by the trailer.
Extendable tongues, well designed bunks, rollers, & such go along ways for "easy trailering."
Let the trailer be the compromise; the beast of burden.
I don't care if my Prius can't tow it.
Don't compromise the boat.
#50
Posted 11 December 2008 - 09:48 PM
So, how do you build a 21~22 footer that the masses can afford?
I think it has to be tooled in China, it has to be molded in China, but it has to be assembled in the USA. Why? Shipping. How many hulls and decks can be nested in a high cube 40? How do you drive down shipping costs? Put more dollars in the container. If you cube out the container but don't max out the weigh then cast the keels in Chan also and max out the weight also. If you can get $250k worth of product in the conatiner (20 boats?) then shipping costs are minimized ~$260 per boat.
I'll be back, gotta go to a kid event.
#51
Posted 11 December 2008 - 09:50 PM
#52
Posted 11 December 2008 - 09:55 PM
I love the idea of a modern Folkboat. Plenty of performance, sleep onboard overnight on occasions blah blah blah. At anchor rig a boom tent and open that great big hatch to stand up.
Lets face it, on a boat of this size sitting is all you will ever do. Trouble with a lot of pockets is that they try and stuff too much down below...KISS babies KISS.
Can't wait to see the lines.
Ummmmmm...does this mean the 32 is finished ? Certain lack of I dotting and T crossing....then again I guess this is all conceptual stuff so maybe the final details are not so important.
#53
Posted 11 December 2008 - 09:56 PM
It rains like crazy up here and a lot of the time it's cold. I want this boat to be dry and snug.
I have a set of lines now. No you can't see them. I have to wait and see how they layout works but so far it's sweet.
I don't want the raised deck to go all the way to the bow because I dont need the headroom there.
The beam is 8.4' but there is a chine so the BWL is much less.
There are 2" over total overhangs. And I may get rid of that.
Hey!
Check out the lastest BLUE WATER SAILING issue. Sons is a rock star and a hero!
Womby:
32 is not finished it's just side tracked until this rush of creativity passes.
#54
Posted 11 December 2008 - 10:06 PM
ok, i'm pouting now...No pop top.
#55
Posted 11 December 2008 - 10:34 PM
#56
Posted 11 December 2008 - 10:46 PM
No pop top.
It rains like crazy up here and a lot of the time it's cold. I want this boat to be dry and snug.
I have a set of lines now. No you can't see them. I have to wait and see how they layout works but so far it's sweet.
I don't want the raised deck to go all the way to the bow because I dont need the headroom there.
The beam is 8.4' but there is a chine so the BWL is much less.
There are 2" over total overhangs. And I may get rid of that.
Hey!
Check out the lastest BLUE WATER SAILING issue. Sons is a rock star and a hero!
Womby:
32 is not finished it's just side tracked until this rush of creativity passes.
The Cal 20 has raised deck, small Tanzer did, even the C&C 25.
I can't remember any raised decks from that time that DIDN'T go to the bow. But hey, this is purposely something new, right? The transition from raised deck to foredeck (pretty small); a challenge to make it look good.
Deep draft for performance and two person sailing; yes.
But, need or desire to trailer is important to many.
So, keep consideration of lifting bulb keels, Southerly type keel, centerboard etc etc alive (for now)
Great thread, look forward to drawings.
#57
Posted 11 December 2008 - 10:49 PM
ranger_champs.jpg 183.09K
77 downloads
Ranger_day.jpg 262.78K
62 downloads
Smokin_Ranger.jpg 149.98K
77 downloads
hood_23_2.jpg 23.27K
50 downloads
hood_23.jpg 30.99K
21 downloads
hood_23_sail.jpg 34.14K
37 downloadsBoth the Hood 23 and my old Cole 23 had large pop tops with a sliding smaller hatch built in.
cole_23.jpg 30.9K
22 downloads
cole_hatch.jpg 27.48K
12 downloadsThe aft end of the vee berth folded down to make the fwd end of a U dinette.
cole_23_bunk.jpg 19.3K
12 downloads
#58
Posted 11 December 2008 - 10:51 PM
#59
Posted 11 December 2008 - 10:59 PM
The Hood 23 was a local production boat (Warwick not Ted) that are still very popular.
#60
Posted 11 December 2008 - 11:00 PM
Then you'd be an old Columbia 29?The raised cabin just doesn't look right to my eye, how about a flush deck? Similar to a MORC boat, you can get light and ventilation through hatches, deck prisms, and vents.
#61
Posted 11 December 2008 - 11:00 PM
Just leave it to me. I have come up with something and when I feel the time is right to unveil it I will. I need to work out a few of the kinks before I post it. Then we can kick the shit out of it.
The problem with a flush deck is that it gives you volume and headroom in areas where you don't need it.
Paps:
Yep, those are pretty close except for the "drop nose".
Chester, Chester,Chester:
Hang in there with me. Wait and see where I am trying to go with this.
We will find a spot for you in the WLYDO.
#62
Posted 11 December 2008 - 11:05 PM
Sailman:
Just leave it to me. I have come up with something and when I feel the time is right to unveil it I will. I need to work out a few of the kinks before I post it. Then we can kick the shit out of it.
The problem with a flush deck is that it gives you volume and headroom in areas where you don't need it.
Paps:
Yep, those are pretty close except for the "drop nose".
Chester, Chester,Chester:
Hang in there with me. Wait and see where I am trying to go with this.
We will find a spot for you in the WLYDO.
Drop Nose!!!!! Not sure I like the sound of that Bob, but will hold my fire until I see it.
#63
Posted 11 December 2008 - 11:20 PM
SF Bird Boat
#64
Posted 11 December 2008 - 11:25 PM
Nice boat and I wish you the best with it but it's not at all what I have in mind.
I am thinking a 21' boat with good sitting headroom and nice big hatch so there's hearoom somewhere.
I am thinking something that looks a bit unique. Leif's boat looks like a hundred other nice boats.
I will not start with any other boat. I will start with a blank sheet of paper (computer monitor).
CA can go off on any tangent they like but I think I'll stick to my initial image for my pocket cruiser.
There's no point in playing this game if we are just going to regurgitate a slightly modified version of what is typical today. That's not the way the WLYDO does it.
Is it?
I want to create something that does not exist now.
Just for the hell of it, imagine a hybrid between Leif's design and that thing on the cover of Small Craft Advisor posted earler.
Hey Bob did you see the french 21footer being sold by the company based out of Colorado this past year? Damn the company name slips my mind. They had a few hulls built in Poland shipped to them in Colorado hulls and decks seperate where they finshed them up etc. They had a few different hulls. 25foot sport boat type rig - a columbia 28 looking rig - a little 24foot pilot house - and this french 21 footer. It had sitting head room - a small head on starboard side just inside the companionway ie aft quarter berth area. Was a cool concept they packed alot into it. I actually kinda digged the 24ft pilot house great views full standing room etc - looked kinda cool lots of people thought it looked kinda neat- they were all swing keel.
#65
Posted 11 December 2008 - 11:26 PM
loa = 21'6",lwl = 19'6", beam = 8'8", draft = 4'7", disp = 4950 lbs.
Altogether big, but short.
Attached Files
#67
Posted 12 December 2008 - 12:11 AM
Poster AWKII?
Freedom Boat Works
Freedom 21 not to be confused with the Freedom 21 Catboat from the mid eighties
As I remember there were a lot of thumbs up on this boat until we figured out that the 441 lbs of internal ballest was water.
I could be wrong but I believe that most of these boats were intended to go after the Mac 26x owners who wanted something different.
Someone here bought the Sportboat that was at the Seattle show.
#68
Posted 12 December 2008 - 12:17 AM
U20 are you talking about Kiwi Boat Works that became Freedom Boat Works of Colorado?
Poster AWKII?
Freedom Boat Works
Freedom 21 not to be confused with the Freedom 21 Catboat from the mid eighties
Yes thats it!!!! - Damn couldn't for the life of me think of the name
Freedom boat works - not the freedom most of us think of.
It was far from being a mini Transat boat- though it had that look about it. I could see a small family or a couple kicking between islands in the San Juans on one for a cheap/quick vacation. It wasn't heavy or really serious ocean material.
#69
Posted 12 December 2008 - 12:20 AM
The problem with a flush deck is that it gives you volume and headroom in areas where you don't need it.
Exactly.
Now load 4 adults into the back and go for an afternoon sail. It feels weird hiking on a Coronado 25. Maybe traps? I love the windblock.
It would be nice to get crew weight seated forward, out of the cockpit, without having to suggest it....
coronado_schematic.jpg 20.25K
74 downloads
#70
Posted 12 December 2008 - 12:24 AM
#71
Posted 12 December 2008 - 12:25 AM
I can see a small family in that boat too.
Husband 4'9"
Wife 4'1"
Kid 1 2'10:
Kid 2 2'2"
#72
Posted 12 December 2008 - 12:28 AM
U20:
I can see a small family in that boat too.
Husband 4'9"
Wife 4'1"
Kid 1 2'10:
Kid 2 2'2"
Very possible. We had a slip right next to the 21footer working the U20 program at the Oakland show. I went and sat on all of their boats - I went back and sat on the pilot house like 3 times. It was just cool.
Nothing crazy fancy - pretty basic boats - with some fun features like the boarding ladders built into the bow - swing keel you just beach it kick the boarding ladder out and walk off the boat. Not sure howmany people would do that but the idea was kinda fun.
#73
Posted 12 December 2008 - 12:39 AM
is often being described here. Sure, its pretty pricey, but you'll never wear it out. Better yet, mines paid for.
- kg
#74
Posted 12 December 2008 - 12:55 AM
#75
Posted 12 December 2008 - 01:20 AM
Thanks very much.
what you see there is about 2 hours of work. A friend had some bad news today and I was working with a lot of pent up energy/anger/rage whatever. I was using this project to vent. Of course I have been thinking about this boat for the last three years and at one time I did do some drawings. But I lost them.
I think a number of rigs can work on this boat. For now, seeing this is a project aimed at me, I
l draw the rig I like, a simple stayed sloop rig. Maybe I'll work on a rig for you next. Cat yawl? Why would you want a "cat yawl"?
That poor little mizzen will suffocate. .
#76
Posted 12 December 2008 - 01:49 AM
The displacement was initially a shock but in comparing its waterlines with a 25ft and change boat puts it in a better light. Coachroof aft looks good but I'm mulling on the forward profile and what the face of it would look like.
Re: the rig. With short LOD and 3,000lbs displacement, a square top, modern gaff or almost gunter-gaff would easily get the sail area up without an excessively tall rig. They would give it a classical heritage too but fast when combined with that hull.
Interesting.
#77
Posted 12 December 2008 - 01:50 AM
A little bit Cal 20 and a little bit Rocket 22.
#78
Posted 12 December 2008 - 02:07 AM
#79
Posted 12 December 2008 - 02:25 AM
Alright, the cabin could grow on me. I like the prod idea. Isn't that a ton of flare in the bow section?I like that Garden boat. The difference is that mine will actually sail.
Give me a few more minutes.
Don't laugh now,,,,,,CA_21.pdf 117.52K 599 downloads
U20:
Wasn't that a Mini Transat boat?
#80
Posted 12 December 2008 - 02:34 AM
Since Greever hasn't chimed in, can we have a Pilot House version with a tug boat whistle?Veeger:
Thanks very much.
what you see there is about 2 hours of work. A friend had some bad news today and I was working with a lot of pent up energy/anger/rage whatever. I was using this project to vent. Of course I have been thinking about this boat for the last three years and at one time I did do some drawings. But I lost them.
I think a number of rigs can work on this boat. For now, seeing this is a project aimed at me, I
l draw the rig I like, a simple stayed sloop rig. Maybe I'll work on a rig for you next. Cat yawl? Why would you want a "cat yawl"?
That poor little mizzen will suffocate. .
ducking.....
#81
Posted 12 December 2008 - 02:35 AM
Here's my first pocket cruiser:
wayfarer_copy.jpg 126.32K
50 downloads With a custom boom tent, this was way too much hassle as a camper cruiser, although we did sail the Gulf Islands in her. That's the PO looking possessive, on Redberry Lake in Saskatchewan. Nice chines, eh? One of these was sailed from Scotland to Iceland, doublehanded. Not by me, I'm not that much of a nutbar.
#82
Posted 12 December 2008 - 02:53 AM
Very nice! Love the max'd waterline and the prod! Two hours on the computer maybe, but 2~3 years festering in the back of the brain pan... often the best design work gets done in that very weird realm. I like the cabin. Please, no f*(&$^'ing pop top. No nut ball rigs, just a nice sloop rigged boat... Now just make cold molding and a wood or carbon spar optional!
Great start... this is going to be more a BP boat than a WLDYO effort, but that's fine.
#83
Posted 12 December 2008 - 02:54 AM
Alright, the cabin could grow on me. I like the prod idea. Isn't that a ton of flare in the bow section?I like that Garden boat. The difference is that mine will actually sail.
Give me a few more minutes.
Don't laugh now,,,,,,CA_21.pdf 117.52K 599 downloads
U20:
Wasn't that a Mini Transat boat?
bow flare is great in little boats... The Moore 24 just pops out of the water if you stick the bow in a wave.
#84
Posted 12 December 2008 - 02:59 AM
I have loved the Ranger look since I was a kid.
CA_21_paps_vers.pdf 161.42K
217 downloads
#85
Posted 12 December 2008 - 03:35 AM
Frank Dye.. he and his wife sailed all over the North Sea. Their Iceland trip must have been a bit spooky at times. Solid boats and good to sail, and they'll get up and plane with no bad vices. I like them and thery're good as training dinghies. Big sister to the jack Holt designed Enterprise.In profile, it looks a lot like a Shark 24 (including the keel!), without the overhang and lazarette. In plan view, it's over 2 feet wider and carries the beam a lot further forward and aft. I like how the chine just kisses the water at rest.
Here's my first pocket cruiser:wayfarer_copy.jpg 126.32K 50 downloads
With a custom boom tent, this was way too much hassle as a camper cruiser, although we did sail the Gulf Islands in her. That's the PO looking possessive, on Redberry Lake in Saskatchewan. Nice chines, eh? One of these was sailed from Scotland to Iceland, doublehanded. Not by me, I'm not that much of a nutbar.
sorry.. back to the topic
#86
Posted 12 December 2008 - 06:01 AM
But she sure does look flat bottomed. It this it going go upwind in heavy chop ok? Think SF bay, or Hawaii where you get 20 knots on a daily basis. How would it do?
#87
Posted 12 December 2008 - 11:07 AM
Little tight but it was fun none the less.
So, how do we keep it simple enough to bring to the market for $15k?
#88
Posted 12 December 2008 - 01:21 PM
Maybe it's time for a wee tutorial on hull lines.
Because the stem is plumb, by definition there can be no bow flare in this design.
I could have tortured the shape though and worked in some flare as I went aft ( Like the Saga 43) . But I did not.
I just don't see where you guys get the idea this boat has "flare".
Flare is a concavity to the bow sections. I see none because there is none.
Maybe it's a terminology issue.
Aesthetics:
I'm far from happy with what I have now. But, it's start and I will work with it.
Maybe the drop nose is not working.
I welcome all involved in the WLYDO to start chipping in.
It's more fun that way.
Displ:
3,000 is not heavy for a little cruising boat.
That's a D/L of 140. When has that become "heavy"?
The bottom is flattish because I think it is the shape I need to make this boat go fast and at the same time give me volume where I willneed it for a given displ.
Joli:
"Family of six"?
Give me time to lay the interior out. I had head placement dreams all night. I sholuld be able to do better than that.
I have to get some work done today. I dropped my project to jump on the 21'er yesterday and now I am behind.
#89
Posted 12 December 2008 - 01:35 PM
New boat owners are like kids...they want what they see on TV. They see the VOR, Maxi's, and race fleets. Gotta give'm what appeals to them.
If I were shopping for this type boat, as a new sailor, here would be my wish list.
-A proper marine head. Maybe under a removeable panel in the v-berth.
-simple sloop rig
-a dedicated area to strap down a cooler
Very impressive.
#90
Posted 12 December 2008 - 01:39 PM
Let's try this one.
I'll add 4" "side decks" to give it some definition.
CA_21B.pdf 119.96K
365 downloads
#91
Posted 12 December 2008 - 01:50 PM
Time to ponder.
#93
Posted 12 December 2008 - 01:51 PM
I could not handle that cabin trunk profile.
Let's try this one.
I'll add 4" "side decks" to give it some definition.CA_21B.pdf 119.96K 365 downloads
Now that's better......Raven has that kind of look in her cabin....works well....
#94
Posted 12 December 2008 - 02:03 PM
That cabin nose looks much better. How are you transitioning the cabin side into that? Is it just a straight line across, which would present a squarish nose, or is there a radius to smooth out the transition?I cleaned it up a bit
CA_21C.pdf 119.54K 329 downloads
What I was talking about earlier with the flare was this section:
CA21_Bow_Section.JPG 13.93K
25 downloadsLooking at it more carefully, I realize it was a perception.
#95
Posted 12 December 2008 - 02:49 PM
I cleaned it up a bit
CA_21C.pdf 119.54K 329 downloads
It's just a sketch, and I'm not the best at visualizing from a plan, but do I detect an overall deck/cockpit arrangement not too different from the C&C 25? The used a bunch of illusions to hide the height of the cabin top, and it looks pretty good.
Is that a bowsprit for the forward stay, or a prod for an assym?
Attached Files
#96
Posted 12 December 2008 - 02:51 PM
That would explain that.
That is not flare. What you are seeing is "hollow" in the entry in plan view.
You can call anything anything you like I DGARA.
But in the world of yacht design, and I tell you this because I am certain you want to know, "Flare" refers to hollow in the sections, the body plan, the transverse cuts thru the hull. Flare is a concavity in the sectional shape. "Flam" is a convexity in the sectional shape. I seldom use "flam" because 99% of the boats we look at today have either straight forwatd sections or flam to some degree. My little boat has flam and that is the opposite of flare.
SemI;
I don't know what the prod is for yet. I'm just sure I will need it before I am done.
Yes, C&C were masters at hiding cabin trunk height. I have been trying to copy their tricks for years.
My boat is 21.6' LOA so a 25'er is a much bigger boat.
Hey! Has anyone seen the new BLUE WATER SAILING yet?
#97
Posted 12 December 2008 - 02:59 PM
That cabin nose looks much better. How are you transitioning the cabin side into that? Is it just a straight line across, which would present a squarish nose, or is there a radius to smooth out the transition?I cleaned it up a bit
CA_21C.pdf 119.54K 329 downloads
What I was talking about earlier with the flare was this section:CA21_Bow_Section.JPG 13.93K 25 downloads
Looking at it more carefully, I realize it was a perception.
Sailman, that is an optical illusion.
Bob
This hull is fantastic! She definitely has a very tough look to her. I'm pretty sure you're still scratching your head about that cabin top, so I'll hold my comments on that.
btw, sorry about the bad news. we're fortunate you have an outlet.
haven't seen BWS. Will need to get a copy over lunch today.
#98
Posted 12 December 2008 - 04:09 PM
What purpose the chines? They don't look dramatic enough to increase interior volume much, provide planing sections or allow flat panel construction.
#99
Posted 12 December 2008 - 04:55 PM
So what is Flim then? Can't have Flam without Flim."Flam" is a convexity in the sectional shape.
I like the prod - it will allow us to carry a larger rig. Plus the way it is drawn now it looks modern, but still elegant.
#100
Posted 12 December 2008 - 05:24 PM
romaine
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












