![]() ![]() |
Nov 9 2009, 10:47 PM
Post
#151
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4720 Joined: 28-December 03 From: Mystic, CT Member No.: 114 |
Thanks for the update, and keep up the pace!
For those who may have missed it on the race website, the attached pictuer is of the damage to Tieto's keel structure. Does not look good....
Attached File(s)
|
|
|
|
Nov 10 2009, 05:47 PM
Post
#152
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2520 Joined: 1-January 04 From: The Netherlands Member No.: 188 |
THanks Rm, can not see much in that pic, looks not horrible to me, and that part on the front is not structural, because you do not use CSM in structural parts, in any case Lombard would not accept that.
But hey, armchair sailor/builder , if they feel the keel move, its probably moving... but this photo does not show much. |
|
|
|
Nov 12 2009, 08:46 AM
Post
#153
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 732 Joined: 9-January 04 From: Amsterdam Member No.: 699 |
THanks Rm, can not see much in that pic, looks not horrible to me, and that part on the front is not structural, because you do not use CSM in structural parts, in any case Lombard would not accept that. But hey, armchair sailor/builder , if they feel the keel move, its probably moving... but this photo does not show much. What is that thing on top? A weed cutter? Does anybody know if that is standard on the boat. maybe an owner addition, which could account for the CSM. Just a theory though. It is a letter box construction, if the keel is moving - tighten the bolts. |
|
|
|
Nov 12 2009, 08:26 PM
Post
#154
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2520 Joined: 1-January 04 From: The Netherlands Member No.: 188 |
Maybe an endoscoop thingy ? Was wondering the same. Did not see it on a standard Akilaria.
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2009, 08:35 PM
Post
#155
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 732 Joined: 9-January 04 From: Amsterdam Member No.: 699 |
Maybe an endoscoop thingy ? Was wondering the same. Did not see it on a standard Akilaria. I have seen endoscopes plenty, and that ain't it. The yellow/green? cable should be ground I figure. Maybe this is somebodies idea of how to connect to the keel? I would, well, use the keel bolts for that. I have to say whether Marc allowed it or not, that lamination is not my cup of tea. |
|
|
|
Nov 12 2009, 08:42 PM
Post
#156
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 143 Joined: 31-May 05 Member No.: 6117 |
And Bernard/Bruno make the pass...this should be a close finish for 2nd and 3rd
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2009, 08:49 PM
Post
#157
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 25-October 09 Member No.: 40648 |
And what about the guys on Sail4Cancer ! Fantastic performance for a totally self-funded campaign by 2 amateur sailors (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 01:31 PM
Post
#158
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4720 Joined: 28-December 03 From: Mystic, CT Member No.: 114 |
Breakages List, Updated. New Items in bold.
As of November 13 , 2009 Boats That Abandoned the Race
Boats Still In the Race
Ten boats had to drop out, 9 for problems with boat or equipment and 1 due to an injury. Of the remaining 14 boats, all of them have had one or more issues that made it to the race site. The problems have run the range, although there seems to be relatively few (three) structural issues. There are a fair number of autopilot problems (7 boats), and a significant number of boats that have lost the equipment at their masthead (9 boats). Five boats have had tears in their main sails and four boats have had damage to main sail batten cars. Virtually the entire fleet has had damage of various sorts to their spinnaker inventory. [/quote] |
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 02:00 PM
Post
#159
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 564 Joined: 1-January 04 Member No.: 187 |
Maybe an endoscoop thingy ? Was wondering the same. Did not see it on a standard Akilaria. I have seen endoscopes plenty, and that ain't it. The yellow/green? cable should be ground I figure. Maybe this is somebodies idea of how to connect to the keel? I would, well, use the keel bolts for that. I have to say whether Marc allowed it or not, that lamination is not my cup of tea. Hard to tell what is happening in that photo. I would guess the wire is going to a keel bolt as a ground. I would guess that that tube like thing is a sprue hole for potting the keel head in the keel box on intial installation. I would guess that if the keel is moving, they did not do a proper job of potting and that there are voids in the pocket....tightening the bolts will not solve this. The sprue hole situation looks like an after thought....perhaps because they knew they did not get enough potting on the first go. |
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 04:08 PM
Post
#160
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 142 Joined: 5-March 07 Member No.: 16740 |
Soldini complains some (small) undisclosed issues concerning energy, so that they can't use the water maker.
They are also running short of food. |
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 09:26 PM
Post
#161
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2520 Joined: 1-January 04 From: The Netherlands Member No.: 188 |
Here a photo of the keel,
not much sprueing needed. Clicky clicky So sail for cancer funded by the sailors ? Can not imagen one of the two sailors having a lot of money as far as I know him ( a little). |
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 09:43 PM
Post
#162
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 25-October 09 Member No.: 40648 |
Here a photo of the keel, not much sprueing needed. Clicky clicky So sail for cancer funded by the sailors ? Can not imagen one of the two sailors having a lot of money as far as I know him ( a little). Yep totally funded by the sailors - no sponsorship from anyone - the boat is chartered. Also as the chosen charity is not registered in France, it did not receive the E25,000 that the other charities did - I believe the same happened to the American sailors charity as it is California based. The boys on Sail4Cancer are hoping to raise some money - people can donate directly to the charity online at www.sail4cancer.org |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2009, 12:02 PM
Post
#163
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 369 Joined: 12-October 07 Member No.: 22618 |
it was a very interesting race, and it has been a while since Soldini has been defeated, but he did manage to edge out Stamm for 2nd place... well done to De Lamotte and Hardy.
I think this race proves that the class 40 is not as robust or fail proof as the portimao global race suggested. The lack of competition in the portimao race did not really force those skippers to push hard, imo. plenty of lessons to be learned for the class from this race, as the boats still have many issues which can be fixed. I cant wait for the next races btw, Farr announced it will build a class 40 boat... |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2009, 02:46 PM
Post
#164
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 142 Joined: 5-March 07 Member No.: 16740 |
it was a very interesting race, and it has been a while since Soldini has been defeated, but he did manage to edge out Stamm for 2nd place... well done to De Lamotte and Hardy. Yes, 3 months ago, in the Fastnet race and still by De Lamotte. Chapeau, even if in this case there's been a bit of (bad) luck ... |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2009, 03:25 PM
Post
#165
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4720 Joined: 28-December 03 From: Mystic, CT Member No.: 114 |
it was a very interesting race, and it has been a while since Soldini has been defeated, but he did manage to edge out Stamm for 2nd place... well done to De Lamotte and Hardy. I think this race proves that the class 40 is not as robust or fail proof as the portimao global race suggested. The lack of competition in the portimao race did not really force those skippers to push hard, imo. plenty of lessons to be learned for the class from this race, as the boats still have many issues which can be fixed. I cant wait for the next races btw, Farr announced it will build a class 40 boat... Hmmm...... my take is a bit different. These guys got pasted with 4 or 5 pretty severe lows and came out of it with only three out of 2 boats that had any structural issues and no boats abandoned. No rigs lost. All of the other issues were due to issues that speak to prep or to choices made in sail cloth, batten pockets and cars, water makers, or other things that can be dealt with in preparation. Contrast that to the damage in the IMOCA 60 fleet during the TJV with I think only one low so far. I would argue that the Class 40's have had a lower incendice of failure than the IMOCA 60's, and with more severe conditions. The Class rules only require a Cat 1 build, and for weight reasons a lot of the boats are only built to Cat 1 including all of the boats in this race with the exception of Desafio. Portimoa will require a Class 40 built to Cat 0 standards, which will require some modification to most of the existing boats, or a new build. I am going to over simplify the issue, but this will mean an additional bulkhead, some water tight doors in those bulkheads, and an additional hatch or two. Looking at the structural issues in this race (and having a very limited amount of information to go on, that additional structure would not have helped with the keel issue, but may have had some benefit in the two other structural problems that were experienced. |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2009, 08:48 PM
Post
#166
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2520 Joined: 1-January 04 From: The Netherlands Member No.: 188 |
Yeah forget that keel problem till you know more.
I had a client that mentioned a wobbly keel too. Picked up the boat, sailed in the winter accross the Med, hauled it out, with client, and cold not get the keel to wobbly how hard we tried... THere was a big dent in the bulb though... He hit rocks, never told us, and since then did not trust the keel. Nice to have such clients (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2009, 10:12 PM
Post
#167
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11 Joined: 24-September 06 Member No.: 13422 |
it was a very interesting race, and it has been a while since Soldini has been defeated, but he did manage to edge out Stamm for 2nd place... well done to De Lamotte and Hardy. I think this race proves that the class 40 is not as robust or fail proof as the portimao global race suggested. The lack of competition in the portimao race did not really force those skippers to push hard, imo. plenty of lessons to be learned for the class from this race, as the boats still have many issues which can be fixed. I cant wait for the next races btw, Farr announced it will build a class 40 boat... Hmmm...... my take is a bit different. These guys got pasted with 4 or 5 pretty severe lows and came out of it with only three out of 2 boats that had any structural issues and no boats abandoned. No rigs lost. All of the other issues were due to issues that speak to prep or to choices made in sail cloth, batten pockets and cars, water makers, or other things that can be dealt with in preparation. Contrast that to the damage in the IMOCA 60 fleet during the TJV with I think only one low so far. I would argue that the Class 40's have had a lower incendice of failure than the IMOCA 60's, and with more severe conditions. The Class rules only require a Cat 1 build, and for weight reasons a lot of the boats are only built to Cat 1 including all of the boats in this race with the exception of Desafio. Portimoa will require a Class 40 built to Cat 0 standards, which will require some modification to most of the existing boats, or a new build. I am going to over simplify the issue, but this will mean an additional bulkhead, some water tight doors in those bulkheads, and an additional hatch or two. Looking at the structural issues in this race (and having a very limited amount of information to go on, that additional structure would not have helped with the keel issue, but may have had some benefit in the two other structural problems that were experienced. I'm with RM. The Solidaire fleet was dealing with horrendous conditions for longer than the TJV fleet in boats 2/3 of the size and with far less catastrophic problems, look at BT being abandoned for a caved in coachroof. Most of the retirements in the Solidaire came down to preparation and choice of equipment. I think this race goes to show how robust the boats designed to the Class 40 rule really are. Also wonderful to see guys like Nicko Brennan finishing in 5th against legends like Bernard Stamm and Giovanni Soldini with an old chartered boat and no sponsor. From experience I can tell you the boats are absolutely great to sail offshore and I would expect to continue seeing the class grow. |
|
|
|
Yesterday, 10:13 PM
Post
#168
|
|
|
Anarchist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 99 Joined: 20-May 06 From: south coast Member No.: 11266 |
Well done Key source and all the others!
What a race! Only round the world no-stop race is longer? Look forward to the insiders view ,when you have recovered, Racing Ron. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 04:31 AM |