Spinlock PXR for mainsheets?
#3
Posted 22 October 2009 - 02:09 PM
phantom controls:
CIMG0113.jpg (71.64K)
Number of downloads: 94
rs300 controls:
DSC00493.JPG (48.42K)
Number of downloads: 53
#4
Posted 22 October 2009 - 03:34 PM
I would not use for mainsheet personally because they have more friction when tripped.
#8
Posted 22 October 2009 - 08:00 PM
#9
Posted 22 October 2009 - 11:42 PM
Jesse Falsone, on Oct 22 2009, 08:34 AM, said:
I would not use for mainsheet personally because they have more friction when tripped.
I put your auto trap twing system on my 5o (8995), but it seems like theres a lot of friction in the spin halyard now. im positive its not tangled in the mast, and it seems like a lot of it is coming from the upright pxr cleat. could the spring tension bee too tight on ours, or are you seeing the same thing?
#11
Posted 23 October 2009 - 02:57 AM
a question of balance, on Oct 22 2009, 07:42 PM, said:
Jesse Falsone, on Oct 22 2009, 08:34 AM, said:
I would not use for mainsheet personally because they have more friction when tripped.
I put your auto trap twing system on my 5o (8995), but it seems like theres a lot of friction in the spin halyard now. im positive its not tangled in the mast, and it seems like a lot of it is coming from the upright pxr cleat. could the spring tension bee too tight on ours, or are you seeing the same thing?
We have one on our 505 spin halyard, and have a lot of friction somewhere in the system. I hadn't really thought that it was the spinlock, but I'm going to put it on the list for checking out.
#12
Posted 23 October 2009 - 03:49 AM
Wonky, on Oct 22 2009, 07:57 PM, said:
a question of balance, on Oct 22 2009, 07:42 PM, said:
Jesse Falsone, on Oct 22 2009, 08:34 AM, said:
I would not use for mainsheet personally because they have more friction when tripped.
I put your auto trap twing system on my 5o (8995), but it seems like theres a lot of friction in the spin halyard now. im positive its not tangled in the mast, and it seems like a lot of it is coming from the upright pxr cleat. could the spring tension bee too tight on ours, or are you seeing the same thing?
We have one on our 505 spin halyard, and have a lot of friction somewhere in the system. I hadn't really thought that it was the spinlock, but I'm going to put it on the list for checking out.
im pretty sure its the cleat, but found out the yellow slider on the top controls the spring tension. so ill have to try that out.
check that: moving the slider to the left tightens, moving it right loosens.
#14
Posted 23 October 2009 - 02:41 PM
a question of balance, on Oct 23 2009, 12:42 AM, said:
My system seems to work pretty well with no additional friction in the spin halyard. I run my halyard down, through a BB sheave in the front of the mast (using a Seldon mast base with sheaves), through a 30mm block for the ram up (keeps the ram from falling when the kite is up, then aft to the PXR.
The biggest problem I had was getting the trap twings to fully tighten when dousing the kite. My latest incarnation uses a trap twing inside the mast that is 1:1 (i.e. no block inside the mast) with a split tail that runs through Ronstan thru-deck blocks on the mast for low friction (yeah, the hole is larger, but the moment there is low because it's right under the hounds). The twing exists the mast through the 6-sheave heel plug and runs aft. It connects to a 2:1 purchase now. In front of the trap twing PXR I replaced the bushing with a Ronstan RF2379 lead for reduced friction and a good down angle to trip the cleat closed. I also have an "emergency" 2:1 on this line that basically floats in the cockpit in case I need to pull it on tighter (no cleat - just the line running through a thru-deck on the cap).
I also moved the 1:2 reverse purchase for the trap twing from the watertight bulkhead to the underside of the deck for a stronger mount and a better lead.
I will probably need to send you pics.
It's a complicated system, but it works well. Some tweaking is necessary. i have my PXR spring tension set to the middle right now. Don't think it really matters though.
#15
Posted 23 October 2009 - 03:13 PM
Attached File(s)
-
Auto_Trap_Twing_10.23.09.pdf (365.63K)
Number of downloads: 59
#17
Posted 23 October 2009 - 04:57 PM
russell_miller, on Oct 23 2009, 04:55 PM, said:
I use 4mm excel racing for the spin with no issues. trying 6mm mafioli for the trap twing (in cleat). I think that's overkill. I wanted something that wouldn't kink and would grip well in the cleat.
#18
Posted 23 October 2009 - 05:10 PM
#19
#20
Posted 23 October 2009 - 10:30 PM
BalticBandit, on Oct 23 2009, 02:15 PM, said:
Am deff going to try one for my spin halyard new system, didn't like it for main sheet, scared me trying to release quickly when puffed, will stick with my carbo hexaratchet with cam cleat.
#21
Posted 31 October 2009 - 10:38 PM
the pxrs are good for lines that arent controlled too often, like a halyard.
on my 48'er i use 2 of them mounted opposite ways for the purchase on the pole car. all you have to do is pull the line between them, uncleating both, adjust the height of the car, then close both. better than other systems ive seen out there.
#23
Posted 01 November 2009 - 12:32 AM
a question of balance, on Oct 31 2009, 10:38 PM, said:
the pxrs are good for lines that arent controlled too often, like a halyard.
on my 48'er i use 2 of them mounted opposite ways for the purchase on the pole car. all you have to do is pull the line between them, uncleating both, adjust the height of the car, then close both. better than other systems ive seen out there.
that's clever!


Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote

