Jump to content


MAHGUAH_SCALPS_PILGRIMS

Member Since 09 Jan 2009
Offline Last Active Today, 10:16 AM
**---

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Ridiculous Mistake, Ridiculous Punishment

Today, 07:34 AM

And then you turned out to be a total farce, a liar and a troll. AC34 was never going to happen by your words. Everybody was going to jail, by your words. You were going to file several law suits, by your words. You were going to corrupt the CEQA process and kill AC34, by your words. Blah blah blah.

 

Your words don't mean shit, and never have. 

 

You raise several good points with regards to tommy's results so far. 

 

For over two years the words over promise and under perform have been mentioned with regards to the AC 34 and to a large degree it is true. However it pales in comparison to what tommy has produced which is a big goose egg. Zero, nada nothing ! As was mentioned , no one in jail, no fat checks to pay off a law suit .

 

AC 34 came and went. 

 

Its OVER 

 

Larry won , again 

 

Anything going on at this point is window dressing and the only ones apparently worked up over it are our two caped crusaders , you know who you are . 

 

Which one of you is robin ? 

 

batman-and-robin.jpg

mm thanks for your post and yet you fail to understand the process - you dont know at all what I do or dont do 

 

so dont lie or falsify post  about that - 

 

all tho you claim to know which is a total liars claim - you think what I post here is all I achieve ? wow really -- lol 

 

or any  time frames - your ignorance of that is on you

 

mean while folks who do understand are doing something about the fraud and erroneous ggyc ellison fiasco =ac 34 

 

which isnt over yet

 

thats whats good about the process and those who know and know it which obviously  what are not one  who does 

 

pity ..

 

whatever

 

 the process and prosecution continues and if you think I am un/in effective affective  whatever 

 

so dont post bs you dont know about - that would be a start for rational thinking on your part 

 

just a suggestion 


In Topic: Ridiculous Mistake, Ridiculous Punishment

Today, 05:39 AM

 

Peter and Stingray,

 

1. OR cheated (in 5 ways that the IJ uncovered, perhaps more they did not uncover)

2. They suborned Jr. members of the team to do the cheating

3. They then tried to cover up at least part of it (removing lead from at least one king post)

4. They (the team as a whole) then stonewalled and did not admit who was involved in directing or doing part of the cheating (the spigots and spacers). So the IJ was not able to determine all who were involved in the cheating.

5. Then at least one OR lied to the IJ.

 

Not a single part of that is defend-able.  All 5 steps together is totally and completely unacceptable. And it is further even worst that these are 'the role models' of the sport.  They very clearly damaged the integrity and reputation of the sport.  And trying now to reduce ISAF's oversight is exactly the wrong reaction, one of spoiled brats who are simply used to getting their own way and writing their own rules.

 

And those of you who are trying to 'minimize' this incident are doing the sport no favor.  You are suggesting to other sailors that some level of cheating/iying/stonewalling is 'not so bad'.

great post thanks estar - 

 

spinray and little peter are paid intruders for ehman ortusa ggyc

 

so dont expect and revelations or confessions from them

 

I do appreciate your great informative posts as other s I am sure here  do also 

 

cheers 

 

Again, you don't have a fucking clue.

 

Neither does Evans on this one.

 

But thanks for sharing. 

:lol:

 

too bad your so wrong again - your smart when it serves your purpor$e$

 

but I knew that about you when you were working for ehman to try and infiltrate my ac trust works way back-

 

you thought you were tricking me - ?  :lol:

 

which you made 2 agreements on for compensation with ac trust  -so if you think I was so delusional 

 

why did you want to get paid from those delusional ac trust  projects/ case s?  :rolleyes:

 

and your ''friends '' who we met with in person at newport yc  and via phone emails - they were more appreciative then you were/are 

 

including pope= paul henderson ex isaf among others 

 

who also believed I had good intel and evidence -

 

ehman/ellison / ggyc have/ has gone too far and many folks are taking action so stay tuned 


In Topic: Ridiculous Mistake, Ridiculous Punishment

Today, 04:20 AM

Peter and Stingray,

 

1. OR cheated (in 5 ways that the IJ uncovered, perhaps more they did not uncover)

2. They suborned Jr. members of the team to do the cheating

3. They then tried to cover up at least part of it (removing lead from at least one king post)

4. They (the team as a whole) then stonewalled and did not admit who was involved in directing or doing part of the cheating (the spigots and spacers). So the IJ was not able to determine all who were involved in the cheating.

5. Then at least one OR lied to the IJ.

 

Not a single part of that is defend-able.  All 5 steps together is totally and completely unacceptable. And it is further even worst that these are 'the role models' of the sport.  They very clearly damaged the integrity and reputation of the sport.  And trying now to reduce ISAF's oversight is exactly the wrong reaction, one of spoiled brats who are simply used to getting their own way and writing their own rules.

 

And those of you who are trying to 'minimize' this incident are doing the sport no favor.  You are suggesting to other sailors that some level of cheating/iying/stonewalling is 'not so bad'.

great post thanks estar - 

 

spinray and little peter are paid intruders for ehman ortusa ggyc

 

so dont expect and revelations or confessions from them

 

I do appreciate your great informative posts as other s I am sure here  do also 

 

cheers 


In Topic: Ridiculous Mistake, Ridiculous Punishment

Today, 04:06 AM

 

you have a great suggestion 

jhc suggestion. I guess GGYC and ISAF are now in a power struggle and one of ISAF weapon could be to review IJ decisions. They will probably end up with an agreement.

 

You two should go get a room. You have no idea what happened.

little peter

 

we know what did and didnt happen and thats what will be considered by ISAF/ comms  now 

 

and you have no idea what is actually going on now and if anyone knows that about you -its me 

 

again your limited views are only slightly respected -by some 

 

but thanks for sharing  :lol:


In Topic: Ridiculous Mistake, Ridiculous Punishment

Today, 03:43 AM

 

 

why not open up to review all the isaf/ac34/ij decisions?

Like the AR challenge "received one second earlier in GGYC computer", making them the AC34 CoR ?

found it -here it is -I hope its the one you wanted - 

 

http://noticeboard.a...11/08/JN007.pdf

Thanks MSP.

ISAF could perhaps be interested to read the IJ decision:

 

Protocol

6.4.
The next Challenger of Record shall be the Challenger who is still a Competitor and was
accepted first in time after the previous Challenger of Record.
 
IJ decision:
36 There was no improper action by GGYC by waiting for funds to be
cleared before confirming acceptance and there was no good reason
for GGYC to delay accepting the Challenge from KSSS.
 
The IJ was wrong for at least 3 reasons:
1) "waiting for the funds" is not mentioned in the protocol or in the Deed
2) They did not question why GGYC refused TNZ challenge one second before the deadline, obliging TNZ to resubmit and be late.
3) they did not consider it was a clear favour of one competitor vs another.

TC 

 

you have a great suggestion 

 

isaf should review the past decisions with ij and then review them knowing the history an events/ tragedy s

 

ie artemis as alleged cor and then simpson death without jones act -via ellison ggyc

 

and no USCG MEP in place or signed at that point

 

in a few weeks it    will be a year ago when he was killed 

 

and no completion of investigation on in voluntary manslaughter charges

 

against ggyc or ellison or cayard  -or uscg / sf city

 

I am submitting those docs / evidence to isaf as we speak

 

so it is still an important issue  - a man was killed by bad process/ illegal uninspected vessels /uscg   and under illegal actions from ggyc and ellison