Jump to content

Team_GBR

Members
  • Content Count

    1,169
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Team_GBR

  1. IGES implies nothing because it is a file format that is neutral and can be read by a wide range of cad systems. I am not sure where you get the idea that the files simply defined a box rule. Each component of the wing was exactly defined and those components were a strict one design shape. To quote Seahorse https://www.seahorsemagazine.com/106-content/march-2017/460-unclipping-the-wings The shape of the components might have been fixed, by the construction and control systems weren't.
  2. All the sources say new boards and rudders have been developed and are being built at core. I think to call them "generic" is wrong, because because they are a development moving on from what teams had done for AC35. The comment I believe is that they will be faster than at AC35. As for the wing, the iges files were a 3d design that all the wings had to build to. That means the shape of each part is the same on all boats. What was not specified was the construction method or the control systems.Most knowledgeable observers suggest that nobody gained any noticeable advantage in construction but
  3. This is where you are so blinkered. The AC50 series isn't going head to head with anything to do with the America's Cup. You seem to be the only person to think that. The America's Cup is a development competition. This is being sailed in boats that will have been "equalised". The America's cup is about match racing. This is about fleet racing. The America's Cup needs a huge team. The AC50 series will not need anything more than a few sailors and a few shore team, say a total of about 10 people. You seem to be obsessed by the idea that they compete against each other. Does the GC32 series
  4. Wasn't the ETNZ boat flown in unassembled? I don't think they bothered to remove the bows, but they could have done very easily if they wanted to.
  5. You keep talking historic geographical names, which are totally irrelevant. It is a simple fact that as a country recognised by the international community, the United Kingdom consists of 2 parts, Great Britain and Northern Ireland (which is why the full name is the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland). If Northern Ireland ceded from the United Kingdom, you would be left with Great Britain. Please can you advise us which part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland the Isle of Wight is actually in. Is it Great Britain or Northern Ireland, or is the Isl
  6. I am seeing Ian Percy this evening, so I will let him know What a surprise. Better make the most of your posting opportunities, because once the announcement is made......
  7. How about an NZer stops trying to give lessons in geography and history to Brits who know a lot more than him. Politically and historically, Great Britain was formed by the combining of the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland in 1707 Acts of Union. In case you were wondering, the kingdom of England at that time was considered to be England and Wales. The term United Kingdom is actually short for "The United Kingdom Of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" which was formally established in 1800 as United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and which was renamed in 1922 after The
  8. While I agree with most of what you said, please reread my comments because I don't believe I said this. I think this is the key. If you are the national team in a sport, it's rather hard to argue you are not Team GB. It's funny how people who aren't British and who have never been part of the British Sailing Team tell Brits and past members of the British Sailing team that they are wrong about how we refer to the team we were in! Maybe the reason i don't associate with Team GB is because I didn't go to the Olympics, but Olympians are a very small sub set of those who are part of
  9. The name situation isn't quite as straight forward as it might seem. Team GB is not a name that most sailors use or are familiar with. The sailing team is formally called British Sailing Team" and is shortened by many to Team GBR because of GBR being on the sail. I have never used the term Team GB is sailing or seen it used. If they had called themselves "Ineos Team GBR" I think there would have been a huge stink from people in the sailing community, but nobody said anything. It was the British Olympic Association who kicked up a fuss, not the British Sailing Team. You could argue that th
  10. No rumours or anything like that but a solid confirmation that the event is going to happen. To set the ground rules, how would you consider a picture from Core with a caption "we are modifying the AC50 fleet for a series that will take place next year"? Or Larry Ellison saying in an interview that there will be an AC50 series which will; be properly announced soon soon? Would you try arguing they were "rumours", gossip or hearsay?
  11. You are so confident how about this. If there is no announcement before the beginning of September, I will never post again, so long as if there is an announcement, you agree to never post again. No sock puppets etc. A simple exit and no return.How about it?
  12. I forgot. Unless it is in a press release, its not a fact Fact - when the series is announced, you are going to look even more stupid than you do already.
  13. Only in your mind. There are many different sources and they seem very consistent. What they say so far is Core are making identical foils. The boats will have identical foil control systems. The boats will have the same electrical power packs. The rest of the boats will be "equalised" so that no one boat will have an advantage, and most people will view them as being one design as per the definition you kindly gave us a link to. Work has already commenced on the boats. Ian Murray will be the event manager. Garda has been approached to be a venue, as
  14. One thing that puzzles me about this. You think that the Ac with boats that are not the same sailing one on one will be spectacular, yet you think that a fleet of equally fast boats that have had their performance equalised won't be. Most people would think it would be the other way around. Close racing at high speed will always be better than one on one with big gaps, as we saw in the last edition. Most races were a boring procession and it was only a few extraordinary races such as between ETNZ and Artemis that were real edge of the seat stuff.
  15. More stupidity and irrational comments. Why do you think the series won't happen unless the boats are identical. Anybody with any common sense wouldn't care less if they were identical or not because that is irrelevant. What is more important is whether one boat will be faster than another. Anyway, the owners and people putting up the money have already spoken, because the boats are being modified right now and the series is being put together. they don't seem to care if the boats are identical. You do know there is very little racing where the boats are identical, don't you? As for
  16. The biggest difference between the 2 was the ability to get hydraulic fluid to the actuators in the wing. As is now well known, BAR had real problems with hydraulics that they never fully solved. By using a battery and the same/similar hydraulic systems, that limitation will be removed and the wings will perform in a very similar manner.
  17. Thanks for providing that link. Now I suggest you read it. Try this particular part In the one design classes listed above, there are those that allow different sailmakers (using different designs) and some that low different mast makers. You are allowed different fit outs of control systems. As I said above and is confirmed by the link you provided. "one design" does not have to be identical.
  18. Yet more evidence that you don't know much. Check out how the term one design is used in the sailing world. One design does not mean everything is identical. Are you really that ignorant?
  19. All you seem to be able to do is nit pick. Do you realise that the wings are close enough to each other that nobody is going to be concerned by the differences. The only differences in the wings are the control systems and the only wing that had any meaningful differences won't be there. Maybe it's not your definition of strict one design, but for the rest of the world, we will worry about things that will make a difference to performance. Get the foil package the same and the foil control package the same and you will have boats where the differences in performance are down to the crew. that'
  20. http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/news/204769/Team-Tilt-returns-to-foiling-at-GC32-Worlds I wonder how this goes with the "concentrating on the AC" that clearly ETNZ is doing Why is Ashby doing the GC32? Why does he mention the relationship with ETNZ? Is ETNZ wasting time with something that has no relevance to the AC?
  21. Again, not quite right. Dalton was against cats for AC34, but subsequent to that he changed his tune and said it woulod be hard to go back to monos because the cats were so good. He then flipped back again because of the deal he did with Bertelli. Even after ETNZ won AC35, Dalton was still saying that cats had to be considered for AC36, even though he knew that the agreement with Bertelli merant they were going back to monos. The problem witrh Dalton is yoiu can never be sure what his position really is. My recent favourite was his insistence that AC36 should be affordable - strange how the on
  22. No It was a condition of the deal between Bertelli and ETNZ when he gave them money, people and IP. It was agreed the next boat would be a monohull. It really is that simple. ETNZ had the last laugh when they came up with a monohull that effectively works just like a multihull. Instead of beams, there are those long arms that the foils are fitted to. If the leeward one breaks while sailing at speed, you really will see some catastrophic event. While it won't "taco", it will capsize at speed, probably break the mast and end up very messy.
  23. Again, you could not be more wrong. Let's start with the obvious. My screen name of "Team_GBR is nothing to do with BAR and all about being fairly proud of having been a member of the British Olympic Sailing Squad, which is known as Team GBR. I might not have been good enough to make it to the Olympics, but i was good enough to get on funding and be training partner to Olympians. I also never suggested that Oracle would win and I never said that BAR would win the last AC. You might have missed that i was the first person to say that BAR was not competitive, because I found that out before anyb
  24. You are now calling people gullible and accusing them of believing in things that don't exist. Please answer these questions, which you avoided last time. 1. ACS posted that Ian Murray said he is going to be running the racing and that the mods are underway, and that Tom Slingsby has said he will be helming in the series? Did he make those thongs up, or did Murray and Slingsby make them up? 2. Am I making it up when I say I have been told that Artemis are in with Outteridge as helm and Percy running the show or did the person who told me lie? 3.Was agk470 making it up wh
  25. If they wanted everybody to know who they are, they would have used their real names.
×
×
  • Create New...