Jump to content

CappyJax

Members
  • Content Count

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

About CappyJax

  • Rank
    Newbie

Profile Information

  • Location
    Martinez, CA
  • Interests
    Anarchy, veganism, flying, dogs, animal rescue

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thanks for sharing your experience. I am one of those people who thinks even a miserable adventure is better than no adventure at all.
  2. Well, I am using the laymen's definition of plants, not the scientific term, if that is what you mean. Anything other than an animal. Algae would be included because they use photosynthesis. Fungi would not, because they obtain nutrients from dead organic matter which originally was derived from a photosynthesizing organism. A more accurate phrasing would be that all calories that humans consume are derived from photosynthesis. There are a tiny fraction of autotrophs that survive from chemosynthesis near geothermal vents, but they are not in the human food chain.
  3. That link doesn't seem to be working. Keeps taking me to the main page.
  4. You might find this interesting. https://www.inbar.int/bamboo-to-combat-desertification-and-drought/
  5. I definitely think bamboo is the best direction to go as well. It grows amazingly fast and can absorb huge amounts of carbon. If we planted the 2 billion hectares of forests we have cut down with bamboo, we could quickly reverse the rising CO2 levels. However, I also know that there are people who want to use complex shapes for high performance boats, and a substitute for fiberglass is needed.
  6. All calories we consume come from plants. Even if you eat meat (which you shouldn't if you are concerned about carbon foot print) those calories originally came from plants. 100% of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins, come from plants.
  7. Even if we ignore that fact that processing and transporting materials is becoming more electric and able to use sustainable energy sources, the amount of carbon produced from traditional sources is a mere fraction of that stored in the woody materials. A semi hauling 24 tons of wood products (Ideally bamboo) is carrying 12 tons of stored carbon will produce around 3/4's of a pound of carbon per mile. Electric tenders are available. https://www.zodiac-nautic.com/en-us/shop/produits/boats-en-us/ejet-en-us/ejet-450/ Breathing is 100% carbon neutral. Where do you think that carbon
  8. Carbon-free meaning use, not manufacture. However, you could have a carbon-free manufactured boat, or even a negative carbon boat if you used enough wood products in its construction.
  9. This is an interesting material. I don't know if it would work with bio based epoxies or not. https://www.isomatex.com/categorie/our-products.html
  10. What the hell is with all the gate keeping? This is ridiculous. I thought aviation was bad.
  11. I wanted to see what everyone's thoughts are on the solar powered yachts that have come out. Silent and Serenity seem to be the most well known commercial products, but the one that really intrigues me is the Energy Observer. http://energy-observer.org I hope the technology comes down in price to make electric sailing a more affordable thing. The mix of those "Ocean Wings" and the solar is very cool, and the hydrogen storage is a good concept, but I do think that battery technology will make HFCs obsolete within a few years. If you could build the ultimate carbon-free boat, how woul
  12. Any opinions on a 47 foot Crowther? https://www.multihullcompany.com/boat-details/?catid=7391228 Seems to check a lot of boxes for me, and I really like the layout. This one is of concern, because it looks like they found an amateur to do all the electrical work and then got them drunk before hand. Eeeks! But From the price I have seen on other Crowthers of the same size, this one might be a good deal and throw some money in it to fix it up.
×
×
  • Create New...