Jump to content

wabbiteer

Members
  • Content Count

    9,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4 Neutral

About wabbiteer

  • Rank
    Super Anarchist
  1. I swear I did not edit that text in any way, and the last sentence really does end with "ATF headquarters" and not "federal prison." The Bush administration initiated a plot to impose new gun laws?
  2. What's that first line right after the redacted part say, Tom?
  3. Ha ha ha ha. Thanks for the laugh. I am stuck inside working on a beautiful Saturday afternoon. Once again, I'm humbled in the presence of a master. While my messenger attack was littered with facts about actual lies on your part, you stuck to the pure form, just attack the messenger and give no specifics. Well done! You constantly post unverifiable crap from dodgy sources like Gun Rights Examiner and then you want to argue that you care about facts? Ha ha ha ha ha ha
  4. Ha ha ha ha. Thanks for the laugh. I am stuck inside working on a beautiful Saturday afternoon.
  5. I'm pretty sure I found you citing one of them, but unwilling to admit it so far, didn't I? Ah. I see. So is the information I posted incorrect or not? Where did you get it? I read it at TPM. Then I confirmed it was accurate before posting it here. I don't see why it matters much. A direct quote is either accurate or it ain't. Are you saying that the quote isn't accurate?
  6. I'm pretty sure I found you citing one of them, but unwilling to admit it so far, didn't I? Ah. I see. So is the information I posted incorrect or not?
  7. Cwickets! Why does it matter where I first read it? I checked it out before posting it here. Are you denying that the DOJ issued this explanation? What's your point?
  8. Did enclosing it in the box with the word "Quote" at the top confuse you somehow, Tom?
  9. Issa is an idiot or a liar. Pick one. By the way, your quote there has no source. Would you mind posting the link where you got it? http://democrats.ove...49#DOJstatement That's strange. The link you provided does not contain the words "Schmaler continued" anywhere on the page, so it could not be the source of the text you quoted. Want to try again and tell the truth this time? (I already found your real source, so you may as well admit it.) The original source of the statement is the DOJ. Are you disputing that?
  10. Issa is an idiot or a liar. Pick one. Or possibly someone who relies on evidence other than statements from a DOJ that has lied about this scandal over and over from the beginning. By the way, your quote there has no source. Would you mind posting the link where you got it? http://democrats.oversight.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5465&Itemid=49#DOJstatement
  11. Really? Judging by your thread title I thought this whole scandal was about Obama personally being involved in trafficking guns to Mexico. I understand that you don't agree with my answer. But I did answer your question. Telling someone to do one thing is not the same as ordering someone not to do something else. It just isn't. I did not start the thread nor advise NGS on the title he chose. This is not a matter of agreement on a subjective subject. Ordering someone to take one of two mutually exclusive courses of action is also ordering him not to take the other. It just i
  12. Really? Judging by your thread title I thought this whole scandal was about Obama personally being involved in trafficking guns to Mexico. I understand that you don't agree with my answer. But I did answer your question. Telling someone to do one thing is not the same as ordering someone not to do something else. It just isn't. Now kindly answer my questions. Who "fully briefed" Grindler on March 12, 2010? When did Melson pull all Patino's ROIs and develop the urge to hurl?
  13. We did indeed, when I claimed that the order to track the straw buyers while the guns disappeared in the hands of an unknown third party constituted an order not to track the guns. You seemed to disagree at the time: If Mommy orders Junior to eat his broccoli, is that the same as Mommy ordering Junior not to eat his chicken? If Dodson's superiors order him to track a straw purchaser while the guns disappear in the hands of an unknown third party, is that the same as Dodson's superiors ordering him not to track the guns? It seems like it is to me, and your statement above impl
  14. That appeal is backed up by facts: it is known that Grindler was fully briefed, and it is known that he is still Holder's Chief of Staff. Issa is right that it is implausible that if he had not done his duty, he would still have that job. Can you clarify two things for me? Who "fully briefed" Grindler on March 12, 2010? When did Melson pull all Patino's ROIs and develop the urge to hurl? Thanks. Sure, but first I want to make sure we both understand words in English the same way. Please address this question without answering it with a stupid and irrelevant questio
×
×
  • Create New...