Timmys_Trick_Turkey 18 Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 don't bother looking for the black box. it hasn't been pumped out for ages, and the drywall screws would have let go by now. Is the wreck still upcurrent from japan ? If so, sayonara sushi.. Personally, Im waiting for hotrods bidet paper towelettes to wash up on a beach somewhere. That beach you know is safe from sharks to surf at, unless of course you have a thing about floating pollywaffles going past your plywood surfboard.... . No shortage of plywood there either. What a mess you have left Hotrod Papasan. What you built was wong in so many weighs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Frayed Knot Arts 1 Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 Maybe I missed it... Maybe it hasn't been posted... MAYBE it never happened??? I still can't find ANY links to a USCG SAR on something called "Flyin' Hawaiian", "Lane's Limping Loser", "HotRod's Harikiri Houseboat" nor nuttin'. I'm confused. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
captpiratedog 98 Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 My guess the tiko straps holding the cross beams to the hulls with drywall screws could support the 1000 gallon holding tank and massive crew weight on the ten piece couch in the 3200 sqft of heavy living space built on 2 x4s combine that together with rigging stresses n it just imploded Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RKoch 1,005 Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 I'm thinking HR vibrated the boat apart when he fired up the Harlisaki. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ishmael 10,655 Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 I'm sorry, people are guessing what particular part of this fuckaroon fell apart first? It fell apart all at once, like the legendary buggy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sand crab 0 Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 Frayed, go to page 115. The CG vids are there but they are disappointing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DA-WOODY 1,284 Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 One would consider the FH to be lashed together perhaps Not properly But Securely Considering all the combined years experience the hired crew had in the field of Bondage Guess the Chains were Ironically the Week-link Quote Link to post Share on other sites
captpiratedog 98 Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 One of my x girlfriends used to be a dominatrix before I met her... and she knew her ropes.. poor Hot Rod must of used Slipknots or forgot his "safety word"...as in."Stay in the Bay" or get whipped by the sea Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pertinacious Tom 1,931 Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 I'm sorry, people are guessing what particular part of this fuckaroon fell apart first? It fell apart all at once, like the legendary buggy. Fractal mistake, failed on an infinite number of fault lines. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
167149 290 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 has the harlisaki appeared in Africa that quick????? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Timmys_Trick_Turkey 18 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 You found lil Murray! Judging by the baggage on the bike in the background, it looks as though this bike is designed to be operated standing up, steering over the top of a bunch of bananas resting on the fuel tank.. Designed after studying 10,000 bikes like the one in the background. The inspiration must have come from the red arrow and the quick e mart in the background that allowed it to be built in their carpark. . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
167149 290 Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 damn!! ...........this thread damn near fell off the planet ................ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
unShirley 256 Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 damn!! ...........this thread damn near fell off the planet ................ as it should Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ishmael 10,655 Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 damn!! ...........this thread damn near fell off the planet ................ as it should It did fall off the planet, now it's orbiting Uranus. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Autonomous 1,234 Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 damn!! ...........this thread damn near fell off the planet ................ as it should It did fall off the planet, now it's orbiting Uranus. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pbd 264 Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 HOT ROD HAS BEEN LOCATED It appears he has made his way south and is up to his old tricks. http://www.actionnewsnow.com/news/customer-bites-off-ca-cafe-owner-s-finger/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remodel 838 Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 Cow's End restaurant? I'm not sure I want to eat anything regardless of which end they are referring too... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
George Dewey 119 Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 And the Coast Guard says... Accident? What accident... We don't know about any accidents... Okay, to be fair, this is the initial response from the first office. I'm still expecting other responses. But, for what its worth (absolutely nothing - but I promised to post responses to my FOIA request) - here it is: Good afternoon Mr. Archer, I represent one of the offices at the Coast Guard that received your FOIA request given by Coast Guard ID 15-0900. As staff of the Office of Auxiliary and Boating Safety, I was able to search the Office's Boating Accident Report Database (BARD), which is composed of recreational boat accidents submitted by State marine agencies. Today, I completed two searches and found no responsive records. 1) I searched for any accident occurring in California between the dates of 1/25/15 to 2/5/15. There were no accidents in BARD for 2/1, and all others during this time period did not occur in Monterey County. 2) I searched for the Flying Hawaiian's number (606236) in any California accident, and found no responsive records. It is possible that the California Division of Boating and Waterways has a record that they haven't submitted yet into BARD. If you would like to contact them directly, please contact Ms. Johanna Naughton, California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways, One Capitol Mall, Suite 500, Sacramento, CA 95814, Phone: (916) 327-1826, [email protected] While an adequate search was conducted, you have the right to appeal this determination that no records exist within the Office of Auxiliary and Boating Safety that would be responsive to your request. Should you wish to do so, you must send your appeal and a copy of this letter, within 60 days of the date of this email, to: COMMANDANT (CG-611), U.S. COAST GUARD, ATTN: FOIA/PA OFFICER, 2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE SE STOP 7101, WASHINGTON, DC 20593-7101. Following the procedures outlined in the DHS FOIA regulations at 6 C.F.R. § 5.9. Your envelope and letter should be marked “FOIA Appeal.” Copies of the FOIA and DHS regulations are available at www.dhs.gov/foia. As noted in my earlier email, I represent just one of the offices at the Coast Guard that received your FOIA request. If you haven’t already, you should hear from another office separately. Please let me know if you have any questions. Your FOIA to this Office is now considered closed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Timo42 73 Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 And the Coast Guard says... Accident? What accident... We don't know about any accidents... Okay, to be fair, this is the initial response from the first office. I'm still expecting other responses. But, for what its worth (absolutely nothing - but I promised to post responses to my FOIA request) - here it is: Good afternoon Mr. Archer, I represent one of the offices at the Coast Guard that received your FOIA request given by Coast Guard ID 15-0900. As staff of the Office of Auxiliary and Boating Safety, I was able to search the Office's Boating Accident Report Database (BARD), which is composed of recreational boat accidents submitted by State marine agencies. Today, I completed two searches and found no responsive records. 1) I searched for any accident occurring in California between the dates of 1/25/15 to 2/5/15. There were no accidents in BARD for 2/1, and all others during this time period did not occur in Monterey County. 2) I searched for the Flying Hawaiian's number (606236) in any California accident, and found no responsive records. It is possible that the California Division of Boating and Waterways has a record that they haven't submitted yet into BARD. If you would like to contact them directly, please contact Ms. Johanna Naughton, California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways, One Capitol Mall, Suite 500, Sacramento, CA 95814, Phone: (916) 327-1826, [email protected] While an adequate search was conducted, you have the right to appeal this determination that no records exist within the Office of Auxiliary and Boating Safety that would be responsive to your request. Should you wish to do so, you must send your appeal and a copy of this letter, within 60 days of the date of this email, to: COMMANDANT (CG-611), U.S. COAST GUARD, ATTN: FOIA/PA OFFICER, 2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE SE STOP 7101, WASHINGTON, DC 20593-7101. Following the procedures outlined in the DHS FOIA regulations at 6 C.F.R. § 5.9. Your envelope and letter should be marked “FOIA Appeal.” Copies of the FOIA and DHS regulations are available at www.dhs.gov/foia. As noted in my earlier email, I represent just one of the offices at the Coast Guard that received your FOIA request. If you haven’t already, you should hear from another office separately. Please let me know if you have any questions. Your FOIA to this Office is now considered closed. I knew it, Diego Fucking Garcia. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Therapy 11 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 And the Coast Guard says... Accident? What accident... We don't know about any accidents... Okay, to be fair, this is the initial response from the first office. I'm still expecting other responses. But, for what its worth (absolutely nothing - but I promised to post responses to my FOIA request) - here it is: Good afternoon Mr. Archer, I represent one of the offices at the Coast Guard that received your FOIA request given by Coast Guard ID 15-0900. As staff of the Office of Auxiliary and Boating Safety, I was able to search the Office's Boating Accident Report Database (BARD), which is composed of recreational boat accidents submitted by State marine agencies. Today, I completed two searches and found no responsive records. 1) I searched for any accident occurring in California between the dates of 1/25/15 to 2/5/15. There were no accidents in BARD for 2/1, and all others during this time period did not occur in Monterey County. 2) I searched for the Flying Hawaiian's number (606236) in any California accident, and found no responsive records. It is possible that the California Division of Boating and Waterways has a record that they haven't submitted yet into BARD. If you would like to contact them directly, please contact Ms. Johanna Naughton, California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways, One Capitol Mall, Suite 500, Sacramento, CA 95814, Phone: (916) 327-1826, [email protected] While an adequate search was conducted, you have the right to appeal this determination that no records exist within the Office of Auxiliary and Boating Safety that would be responsive to your request. Should you wish to do so, you must send your appeal and a copy of this letter, within 60 days of the date of this email, to: COMMANDANT (CG-611), U.S. COAST GUARD, ATTN: FOIA/PA OFFICER, 2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE SE STOP 7101, WASHINGTON, DC 20593-7101. Following the procedures outlined in the DHS FOIA regulations at 6 C.F.R. § 5.9. Your envelope and letter should be marked “FOIA Appeal.” Copies of the FOIA and DHS regulations are available at www.dhs.gov/foia. As noted in my earlier email, I represent just one of the offices at the Coast Guard that received your FOIA request. If you haven’t already, you should hear from another office separately. Please let me know if you have any questions. Your FOIA to this Office is now considered closed. Nice of you to pursue this for us. I bet they want you to wait for the others which I also bet are at least 60 days behind. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ishmael 10,655 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 And the Coast Guard says... Accident? What accident... We don't know about any accidents... Okay, to be fair, this is the initial response from the first office. I'm still expecting other responses. But, for what its worth (absolutely nothing - but I promised to post responses to my FOIA request) - here it is: Good afternoon Mr. Archer, I represent one of the offices at the Coast Guard that received your FOIA request given by Coast Guard ID 15-0900. As staff of the Office of Auxiliary and Boating Safety, I was able to search the Office's Boating Accident Report Database (BARD), which is composed of recreational boat accidents submitted by State marine agencies. Today, I completed two searches and found no responsive records. 1) I searched for any accident occurring in California between the dates of 1/25/15 to 2/5/15. There were no accidents in BARD for 2/1, and all others during this time period did not occur in Monterey County. 2) I searched for the Flying Hawaiian's number (606236) in any California accident, and found no responsive records. It is possible that the California Division of Boating and Waterways has a record that they haven't submitted yet into BARD. If you would like to contact them directly, please contact Ms. Johanna Naughton, California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways, One Capitol Mall, Suite 500, Sacramento, CA 95814, Phone: (916) 327-1826, [email protected] While an adequate search was conducted, you have the right to appeal this determination that no records exist within the Office of Auxiliary and Boating Safety that would be responsive to your request. Should you wish to do so, you must send your appeal and a copy of this letter, within 60 days of the date of this email, to: COMMANDANT (CG-611), U.S. COAST GUARD, ATTN: FOIA/PA OFFICER, 2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE SE STOP 7101, WASHINGTON, DC 20593-7101. Following the procedures outlined in the DHS FOIA regulations at 6 C.F.R. § 5.9. Your envelope and letter should be marked “FOIA Appeal.” Copies of the FOIA and DHS regulations are available at www.dhs.gov/foia. As noted in my earlier email, I represent just one of the offices at the Coast Guard that received your FOIA request. If you haven’t already, you should hear from another office separately. Please let me know if you have any questions. Your FOIA to this Office is now considered closed. Nice of you to pursue this for us. I bet they want you to wait for the others which I also bet are at least 60 days behind. That's the state registry, it was the US Coast Guard who did the rescue. Am I missing something here? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
George Dewey 119 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 That's the state registry, it was the US Coast Guard who did the rescue. Am I missing something here? No, given how far offshore it was the state probably had absolutely no part in this at all. I think we'll get some info soon. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sand crab 0 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 They called the boat the Flying Hawaiin. Maybe that's the problem. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
h20man 70 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 And the Coast Guard says... Accident? What accident... We don't know about any accidents... Okay, to be fair, this is the initial response from the first office. I'm still expecting other responses. But, for what its worth (absolutely nothing - but I promised to post responses to my FOIA request) - here it is: Good afternoon Mr. Archer, I represent one of the offices at the Coast Guard that received your FOIA request given by Coast Guard ID 15-0900. As staff of the Office of Auxiliary and Boating Safety, I was able to search the Office's Boating Accident Report Database (BARD), which is composed of recreational boat accidents submitted by State marine agencies. Today, I completed two searches and found no responsive records. 1) I searched for any accident occurring in California between the dates of 1/25/15 to 2/5/15. There were no accidents in BARD for 2/1, and all others during this time period did not occur in Monterey County. 2) I searched for the Flying Hawaiian's number (606236) in any California accident, and found no responsive records. It is possible that the California Division of Boating and Waterways has a record that they haven't submitted yet into BARD. If you would like to contact them directly, please contact Ms. Johanna Naughton, California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways, One Capitol Mall, Suite 500, Sacramento, CA 95814, Phone: (916) 327-1826, [email protected] While an adequate search was conducted, you have the right to appeal this determination that no records exist within the Office of Auxiliary and Boating Safety that would be responsive to your request. Should you wish to do so, you must send your appeal and a copy of this letter, within 60 days of the date of this email, to: COMMANDANT (CG-611), U.S. COAST GUARD, ATTN: FOIA/PA OFFICER, 2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE SE STOP 7101, WASHINGTON, DC 20593-7101. Following the procedures outlined in the DHS FOIA regulations at 6 C.F.R. § 5.9. Your envelope and letter should be marked “FOIA Appeal.” Copies of the FOIA and DHS regulations are available at www.dhs.gov/foia. As noted in my earlier email, I represent just one of the offices at the Coast Guard that received your FOIA request. If you haven’t already, you should hear from another office separately. Please let me know if you have any questions. Your FOIA to this Office is now considered closed. Thanks.. I was hoping that there would be some response soon... If this is just an office that is searching state records then... there is hope, as I believe the official USCG assets were used for the rescue. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rawhide 100 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Alien abduction, or HR has returned to the mother planet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
alphafb552 626 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Well if the accident didn't happen, maybe the Flyin' Hawaiian will just show up in American Samoa one of these days... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hobie Dog 26 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 OK but didn't we get an initial report from the CG that they did a rescue off a boat call the Flyin' Hawaiian??? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ishmael 10,655 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 OK but didn't we get an initial report from the CG that they did a rescue off a boat call the Flyin' Hawaiian??? Yes, and they posted the rescue video on their site. The state has nothing to do with it because it's outside their jurisdiction, being on the high seas and all. Any answers are going to have to come from them, or from the crew inhabitants of the FH. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sand crab 0 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Yup, the rescue was January 31. https://www.dvidshub.net/video/389708/coast-guard-rescues-5-people-sinking-sail-boat-off-coast-monterey#.VRRO1_nF-ct Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Frayed Knot Arts 1 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Jarcher and SandCrab, thanks for the information! I have tried several times to google something referring to the sinking/rescue/immaculate flotation of the FH, but without success. Until today. Suddenly, googling "flyin' hawaiian catamaran" give me a plethora of links, sites, news feeds, a place to see the USCG rescue footage, to I think that either I've been spelling it wrong or I just managed to squeeze back thru the discontinuity into this universe again. Whatever... Thanks for the help and the ring-bouy. Damn. That stupid sonuvabuitch actually DID try to go to sea in that POS. I are flaggerbasted. I'm even more impressed by 12,221 posts. If you take the amount of time spent in posting/reading about this debacle, add in the cost of materials for the FH, divide by the number of successful tripe out of the bay and then allow to sit for a week, we could have built a pretty successful dinghy and still had enough left over to buy a nice old Schwinn. May we have a moment o silence for Lil'Murray? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sand crab 0 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Frayed, that's why we were hoping Jarcher's FOI request turns up something better that that vid. We want to see the carnage. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Somebody Else 896 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Yup, the rescue was January 31. https://www.dvidshub.net/video/389708/coast-guard-rescues-5-people-sinking-sail-boat-off-coast-monterey#.VRRO1_nF-ct Somebody is trying to tease out some info ... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
George Dewey 119 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Frayed, that's why we were hoping Jarcher's FOI request turns up something better that that vid. We want to see the carnage. Frankly, I'm hoping to find out if Lane himself was actually onboard. Other than the pregnant hermaphrodite, we really have no idea who was onboard and I would not put it past Lane to have sent people off by themselves in that deathtrap. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Therapy 11 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Yup, the rescue was January 31. https://www.dvidshub.net/video/389708/coast-guard-rescues-5-people-sinking-sail-boat-off-coast-monterey#.VRRO1_nF-ct Somebody is trying to tease out some info ... Good try but that answer seems a bit, ummm, fractal. Apples and their distance from trees? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DA-WOODY 1,284 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Yup, the rescue was January Somebody is trying to tease out some info ... Good try but that answer seems a bit, ummm, fractal. Apples and their distance from trees? So many sock puppets and so little time Not even a Mother would admit to knowing the Bearded Ummmm lady Wonder if the last crew had time to take down all the GoPro before being lifted off No Way that All those involved in the rescue thought not to get the FH on camera I would imagine the first thing would be to document the situation before and during - Just in case ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shaggy 1,096 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Rod is holding out for the book/movie deal..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Therapy 11 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Do they have to release all the video "footage"? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sand crab 0 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 I would think so. The existing vid is edited so we know there are some missing pieces there. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
George Dewey 119 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Do they have to release all the video "footage"? Yes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Somebody Else 896 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Good try but that answer seems a bit, ummm, fractal. Apples and their distance from trees? Then please, find a closer contact. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Therapy 11 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Good try but that answer seems a bit, ummm, fractal. Apples and their distance from trees? Then please, find a closer contact. I'm not saying it wasn't a good track. I was commenting on the non-answer to the questions. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Oronoco 0 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 They called the boat the Flying Hawaiin. Maybe that's the problem. I think the actual listing on the USCG documentation of the "vessel" was FLYIN HAWAIIAN Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DA-WOODY 1,284 Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 They called the boat the Flying Hawaiin. Maybe that's the problem. I think the actual listing on the USCG documentation of the "vessel" was FLYIN HAWAIIAN Try asking about the FLOATSAM HAWAIIAN !! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Frayed Knot Arts 1 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Well, if we can't have FH to play with, These would be a nice substitute. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MauiPunter 1,396 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Nice. Those are perfection. They might even be real. Win-Win. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
axolotl 216 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Nice. Those are perfection. They might even be real. Win-Win. Nope. Would probably fail the pencil test. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
savoir 219 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 I have a spare pencil ! Anyone got her number ? Purely for scientific purposes of course. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
casc27 151 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Nice. Those are perfection. They might even be real. Win-Win. Nope. Would probably fail the pencil test. She's young yet. Check back in 5 years and she'll pass the pencil test. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poopie pants 1 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 hahahahaheheheyukyuk dats a dude Quote Link to post Share on other sites
167149 290 Posted April 10, 2015 Share Posted April 10, 2015 horseshit and jellybeans.....dems real I'm sure of it!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blitz 124 Posted April 10, 2015 Share Posted April 10, 2015 I've devoted my life to studying these things and I agree dems real. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poopie pants 1 Posted April 10, 2015 Share Posted April 10, 2015 keep tellin yerself that. ya might think twice b4 ya start tuggin on dat baby batter dispenser Quote Link to post Share on other sites
167149 290 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 are you speaking from experience, ie been there ?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Frayed Knot Arts 1 Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 OK. How about this little lovely? She'd not only pass the pencil test but I'd venture that she'd also get the lead up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MauiPunter 1,396 Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 Careful there. You'll poke your eyes out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
senormechanico 0 Posted April 17, 2015 Share Posted April 17, 2015 Too hairy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Cement_Shoes 17 Posted April 17, 2015 Share Posted April 17, 2015 Careful there. You'll poke your eyes out. knocking a tooth out might be a real possibility as well! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Frayed Knot Arts 1 Posted April 19, 2015 Share Posted April 19, 2015 Too hairy. For your tastes, perhaps, but I side with "Da Hat" (anyone remember Bode and Cheech Wizzard?)... "ICK! Bald Pussy!!!" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Steam Flyer 8,441 Posted April 19, 2015 Share Posted April 19, 2015 Too hairy. For your tastes, perhaps, but I side with "Da Hat" (anyone remember Bode and Cheech Wizzard?)... "ICK! Bald Pussy!!!" Do not try to look under the hat FB- Doug Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Frayed Knot Arts 1 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
167149 290 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Ok , posted this here before , be a shame to loose the symmetry due to foliage.......... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
eric e 9 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 looks like a plough anchor i could plough that Quote Link to post Share on other sites
senormechanico 0 Posted April 30, 2015 Share Posted April 30, 2015 What ever happened with the FOIA request? Will HR have a book / movie deal? Enquiring minds want to know... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Great Red Shark 675 Posted April 30, 2015 Share Posted April 30, 2015 RE: FOI request probable outcome - "Your request for information about the allegedly massive homebuilt vessel that was built and launched under our noses and then lingered nearby for over a year before requiring an expensive and potentially dangerous rescue ? all while we patrol the bay with armed speedboats to 'protect' the homeland ? " "Yeah, we don't seem to recall any of that at all. Thank you for asking" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
senormechanico 0 Posted May 11, 2015 Share Posted May 11, 2015 What an ignominious way for this thread to end... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Cement_Shoes 17 Posted May 11, 2015 Share Posted May 11, 2015 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
europaflyer 1 Posted May 11, 2015 Share Posted May 11, 2015 All the lovely video and reports to gloat over are out there, it's just than no-one seems to be able to spell the name of the damn boat right. The CG could have filed it as Flyin Hawaiian, Flyin' Hawaiian or Flying Hawaiian, and as FOI requests are such a faff to fulfil they'll never admit which it was. I can't even remember how it was originally registered. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
unShirley 256 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 All the lovely video and reports to gloat over are out there, it's just than no-one seems to be able to spell the name of the damn boat right. The CG could have filed it as Flyin Hawaiian, Flyin' Hawaiian or Flying Hawaiian, and as FOI requests are such a faff to fulfil they'll never admit which it was. I can't even remember how it was originally registered. Shirley somebody with too much time on their hands could go back through the thread and find a photo of the name on the boat? Don't look at me, tho... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DA-WOODY 1,284 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 ^^^^^ Failing, Flailing, Floating Flatulating, FugginUgly, Florida - Hawaiian ......... Yes That's it !!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
h20man 70 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 All the lovely video and reports to gloat over are out there, it's just than no-one seems to be able to spell the name of the damn boat right. The CG could have filed it as Flyin Hawaiian, Flyin' Hawaiian or Flying Hawaiian, and as FOI requests are such a faff to fulfil they'll never admit which it was. I can't even remember how it was originally registered. Shirley somebody with too much time on their hands could go back through the thread and find a photo of the name on the boat? Don't look at me, tho... From the USCG database: Vessel Name: FLYIN HAWAIIAN USCG Doc. No.: 1234524 Vessel Service: RECREATIONAL IMO Number: * Trade Indicator: Recreational Call Sign: * Hull Material: FRP (FIBERGLASS) Hull Number: * Ship Builder: JAMES LANE Year Built: 2011 Length (ft.): 65 Hailing Port: LAHAINA HI Hull Depth (ft.): 8 Owner: Hull Breadth (ft.): 32 Gross Tonnage: 55 Net Tonnage: 44 Documentation Issuance Date: December 01, 2011 Documentation Expiration Date: * Previous Vessel Names: No Vessel Name Changes Previous Vessel Owners: JAMES LANE Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DA-WOODY 1,284 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 All the lovely video and reports to gloat over are out there, it's just than no-one seems to be able to spell the name of the damn boat right. The CG could have filed it as Flyin Hawaiian, Flyin' Hawaiian or Flying Hawaiian, and as FOI requests are such a faff to fulfil they'll never admit which it was. I can't even remember how it was originally registered. Shirley somebody with too much time on their hands could go back through the thread and find a photo of the name on the boat? Don't look at me, tho... From the USCG database: Vessel Name: FLYIN HAWAIIAN USCG Doc. No.: 1234524 Vessel Service: RECREATIONAL IMO Number: * Trade Indicator: Recreational Call Sign: * Hull Material: FRP (FIBERGLASS) Hull Number: * Ship Builder: JAMES LANE Year Built: 2011 Length (ft.): 65 Hailing Port: LAHAINA HI Hull Depth (ft.): 8 Owner: Hull Breadth (ft.): 32 Gross Tonnage: 55 Net Tonnage: 44 Documentation Issuance Date: December 01, 2011 Documentation Expiration Date: * Previous Vessel Names: No Vessel Name Changes Previous Vessel Owners: JAMES LANE click refresh and check the Hull Depth again Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dex Sawash 723 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 All the lovely video and reports to gloat over are out there, it's just than no-one seems to be able to spell the name of the damn boat right. The CG could have filed it as Flyin Hawaiian, Flyin' Hawaiian or Flying Hawaiian, and as FOI requests are such a faff to fulfil they'll never admit which it was. I can't even remember how it was originally registered. Shirley somebody with too much time on their hands could go back through the thread and find a photo of the name on the boat? Don't look at me, tho... From the USCG database: Vessel Name: FLYIN HAWAIIAN USCG Doc. No.: 1234524 Vessel Service: RECREATIONAL IMO Number: * Trade Indicator: Recreational Call Sign: * Hull Material: FRP (FIBERGLASS) Hull Number: * Ship Builder: JAMES LANE Year Built: 2011 Length (ft.): 65 Hailing Port: LAHAINA HI Hull Depth (ft.): 8 Owner: Hull Breadth (ft.): 32 Gross Tonnage: 55 Net Tonnage: 44 Documentation Issuance Date: December 01, 2011 Documentation Expiration Date: * Previous Vessel Names: No Vessel Name Changes Previous Vessel Owners: JAMES LANE click refresh and check the Hull Depth again Hard to top that one. Lock thread. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Frayed Knot Arts 1 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
axolotl 216 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 All the lovely video and reports to gloat over are out there, it's just than no-one seems to be able to spell the name of the damn boat right. The CG could have filed it as Flyin Hawaiian, Flyin' Hawaiian or Flying Hawaiian, and as FOI requests are such a faff to fulfil they'll never admit which it was. I can't even remember how it was originally registered. Shirley somebody with too much time on their hands could go back through the thread and find a photo of the name on the boat? Don't look at me, tho... From the USCG database: Vessel Name: FLYIN HAWAIIAN USCG Doc. No.: 1234524 Vessel Service: RECREATIONAL IMO Number: * Trade Indicator: Recreational Call Sign: * Hull Material: FRP (FIBERGLASS) Hull Number: * Ship Builder: JAMES LANE Year Built: 2011 Length (ft.): 65 Hailing Port: LAHAINA HI Hull Depth (ft.): 8 Owner: Hull Breadth (ft.): 32 Gross Tonnage: 55 Net Tonnage: 44 Documentation Issuance Date: December 01, 2011 Documentation Expiration Date: * Previous Vessel Names: No Vessel Name Changes Previous Vessel Owners: JAMES LANE click refresh and check the Hull Depth again I did and it's 8 feet in the database. Could the rutters have been immersed to 8 feet depth? More interesting is the boat is still listed as "In Service". Possibly the CG does not update until the annual recert letter is responded to by the owner, for the FH, that's by December 1st of each year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Frayed Knot Arts 1 Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Sorry... just can't resist.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ishmael 10,655 Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Nice hair. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
toddster 933 Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 looks like a plough anchor i could plough that OMFG. I will never be able to look at an anchor innocently again. thnx. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
toddster 933 Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 All the lovely video and reports to gloat over are out there, it's just than no-one seems to be able to spell the name of the damn boat right. The CG could have filed it as Flyin Hawaiian, Flyin' Hawaiian or Flying Hawaiian, and as FOI requests are such a faff to fulfil they'll never admit which it was. I can't even remember how it was originally registered. Shirley somebody with too much time on their hands could go back through the thread and find a photo of the name on the boat? Don't look at me, tho... From the USCG database: Vessel Name: FLYIN HAWAIIAN USCG Doc. No.: 1234524 Vessel Service: RECREATIONAL IMO Number: * Trade Indicator: Recreational Call Sign: * Hull Material: FRP (FIBERGLASS) Hull Number: * Ship Builder: JAMES LANE Year Built: 2011 Length (ft.): 65 Hailing Port: LAHAINA HI Hull Depth (ft.): 8 Owner: Hull Breadth (ft.): 32 Gross Tonnage: 55 Net Tonnage: 44 Documentation Issuance Date: December 01, 2011 Documentation Expiration Date: * Previous Vessel Names: No Vessel Name Changes Previous Vessel Owners: JAMES LANE click refresh and check the Hull Depth again I did and it's 8 feet in the database. Could the rutters have been immersed to 8 feet depth? More interesting is the boat is still listed as "In Service". Possibly the CG does not update until the annual recert letter is responded to by the owner, for the FH, that's by December 1st of each year. What's that hull material again? I'm not quite sure that an adequate acronym exists... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ishmael 10,655 Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 From the USCG database: Vessel Name: FLYIN HAWAIIAN USCG Doc. No.: 1234524 Vessel Service: RECREATIONAL IMO Number: * Trade Indicator: Recreational Call Sign: * Hull Material: FRP (FIBERGLASS) Hull Number: * Ship Builder: JAMES LANE Year Built: 2011 Length (ft.): 65 Hailing Port: LAHAINA HI Hull Depth (ft.): 8 Owner: Hull Breadth (ft.): 32 Gross Tonnage: 55 Net Tonnage: 44 Documentation Issuance Date: December 01, 2011 Documentation Expiration Date: * Previous Vessel Names: No Vessel Name Changes Previous Vessel Owners: JAMES LANE click refresh and check the Hull Depth again I did and it's 8 feet in the database. Could the rutters have been immersed to 8 feet depth? More interesting is the boat is still listed as "In Service". Possibly the CG does not update until the annual recert letter is responded to by the owner, for the FH, that's by December 1st of each year. What's that hull material again? I'm not quite sure that an adequate acronym exists... FRP? Fir Reinforced Plywood. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
senormechanico 0 Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 FRP in this case equals Funky Rotten Plywood... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dilligaf0220 200 Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 has the harlisaki appeared in Africa that quick????? South Carolina mebbe. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Windward 673 Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 Kind of out-dated over here these days. http://www.hotrodscatamaran.com/home.html I hope the seagull is ok. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
some dude 201 Posted May 21, 2015 Share Posted May 21, 2015 Kind of out-dated over here these days. http://www.hotrodscatamaran.com/home.html I hope the seagull is ok. Can I still donate? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pertinacious Tom 1,931 Posted May 21, 2015 Share Posted May 21, 2015 Kind of out-dated over here these days. http://www.hotrodscatamaran.com/home.html I hope the seagull is ok. Can I still donate? This is weird. I swear I went there the other day and the domain was for sale. Now the site is back up? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts