Jump to content

A Picture is Worth 1,000 Words


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

3 hours ago, Righty_tighty_lefty_dumbas said:

Political cartoons with dead children? The is the left for you, disgusting.

Disgusting that there are dead children because of loop holes in legislation that was passed years ago, and then abandoned instead of being fixed?..... You bet! I  agree with you 100%

As much as a couple of people on this forum like to remind us, as Marco Rubio did to mass derision and ridicule tonight, Banning assault weapons doesn't mean you can't own your squirrel gun. It means you can't own an assault rifle.

A tube fed 9 round magazine .22 is much different than a 30 round AR15.

 And personally, I prefer a bolt action .22 anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

180215125429-01-jamie-guttenberg-stonema

Jaime Guttenberg, 14

This young lady's father does not seem to be impressed with word games and bullshit anymore.  He seems to recognize that his daughter had rights as well.  

https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2018/02/22/gun-town-hall-fred-guttenberg-marco-rubio-full-exchange.cnn

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Righty_tighty_lefty_dumbas said:

28056175_10159977892720203_2407119990535

Wow!! Twice in one day!! That is a beautiful description of what the 2nd says. 

It is perfectly clear to me “infringed” means I can keep and Bear ANYTHING that might be a useful weapon against tyranny. 

  • Like 5
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Gouvernail said:

My very first “like” of one of your posts. 

In  fact I stored it in my photo album for my own use. 

You realize that was an attempt at irony by the idiot don't you Gouv?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Gouvernail said:
17 hours ago, Righty_tighty_lefty_dumbas said:

tumblr_p4gpyetPhJ1rhnukoo1_1280.jpg

My very first “like” of one of your posts. 

In  fact I stored it in my photo album for my own use. 

How about this instead

FoundFathrSaid01.jpg.396c4cd19f6903668d2222105e0c9196.jpg

Seems to fit the case better IMHO

-DSK

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Righty_tighty_lefty_dumbas said:

 

Oh the irony.

i'm sorry your pea-sized brain cannot differentiate. Truth is, the gun nutZ insistence on "No Compromise" is going to doom access to their most-precious. The masses won't stand for it anymore.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Raz'r said:

i'm sorry your pea-sized brain cannot differentiate. Truth is, the gun nutZ insistence on "No Compromise" is going to doom access to their most-precious. The masses won't stand for it anymore.

Personally I'm hoping for a lot of cold dead hands - as partial payment for all the children these assholes were complicit in killing.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Righty_tighty_lefty_dumbas said:

Good thing we have the 2A, so the masses don't matter, only the laws.

there are plenty of regulations that can be passed that are fully within the enumerated rights of the 2nd.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Righty_tighty_lefty_dumbas said:

What happens when you continually lose the debate, IGNORE!

just so you know , the losers in your so called debate are the DEAD CHILDREN.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Righty_tighty_lefty_dumbas said:

How many NRA members killed children?

ALL of 'em , the blood of ALL america's shooting victims is on their hands .

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Mid said:

just so you know , the losers in your so called debate are the DEAD CHILDREN.

He actually thinks his dribbling has value and he's a winner. :lol:

He's so scary that we have to hide him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Raz'r said:

there is no "right" to a specific model of firearm. 

Let me preface this:

i believe the 2nd Amendment needs to be amended or replaced :

having said that:

the 2nd clearly covers ANYTHING that can possibly be considered to be a weapon  and absolutely forbids the Government from imposing any regulations what so ever. 

And having said that: 

let me remind  any reader ;

i am not happy the Secind Amendment is written as it is because I would like to have a few sane regulations in place. 

Especially!!!

Except with  respect to the right of citizens to participate in armed resurrection, I would like to be able to regulate where and when guns may be carried. 

 

  • Like 4
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Raz'r said:

there are plenty of regulations that can be passed that are fully within the enumerated rights of the 2nd.

 

Many share your interpretation.

i do not.

my opinion is the Second Amendment absolutely bans the US Governmrnt from causing a scintilla of infringement on the right to keep and  Bear arms. 

To that end, I believe the wording of the Second Amendment is do absolutey clear and prohibitive that it is unconstitutional for any public official to even ask a question such as, “Have you ever seen a sword.”

Why?

because listening to that question takes a moment of a person’s  lifetime 

 

That is an infringement !!!

* The Amendment really needs to be amended or replaced. !!!

 

  • Like 5
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Gouvernail said:

As the making of many hundreds of downvotes is necessary to properly comment on Dumbass, The right  to suck puppets must not be infringed, 

I'm certainly not going to stop you from sucking puppets, it sounds relatively harmless. Watch out for lead paint.

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Gouvernail said:

Many share your interpretation.

i do not.

my opinion is the Second Amendment absolutely bans the US Governmrnt from causing a scintilla of infringement on the right to keep and  Bear arms. 

To that end, I believe the wording of the Second Amendment is do absolutey clear and prohibitive that it is unconstitutional for any public official to even ask a question such as, “Have you ever seen a sword.”

Why?

because listening to that question takes a moment of a person’s  lifetime 

 

That is an infringement !!!

* The Amendment really needs to be amended or replaced. !!!

 

Totally agree with the last statement, but to attempt to do so could essentially start a second civil war.

Disagree with your interpretation, as the amendment starts out, famously, with the words "well-regulated".  In my opinion, the NRA is equivalent to a militia-in-fact, and are fully open to regulation.

As to owning weapons, the word "infringed" legally can mean many things, from "trespassed" to "broken".  A minor regulation of fire arms might seem to be equivalent to "trespassed" upon, but does not mean the right is "broken".  Many very well tested laws have nibbled away at the "fringes" of "keeping and bearing" arms.  So the state of play in the "infringement" world is far from your "asking about a sword".  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Gouvernail said:

As the making of many hundreds of downvotes is necessary to properly comment on Dumbass, The right  to suck puppets must not be infringed, 

SOCK puppets !!  Will you PLEASE at least TRY to proofread your posts!?!?!

i am NOT that kind of girl!!!!

E4CFFD15-63E6-4778-98D3-B3310CF12FC6.jpeg

  • Like 4
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Gouvernail said:

Let me preface this:

i believe the 2nd Amendment needs to be amended or replaced :

having said that:

the 2nd clearly covers ANYTHING that can possibly be considered to be a weapon  and absolutely forbids the Government from imposing any regulations what so ever. 

And having said that: 

let me remind  any reader ;

i am not happy the Secind Amendment is written as it is because I would like to have a few sane regulations in place. 

Especially!!!

Except with  respect to the right of citizens to participate in armed resurrection, I would like to be able to regulate where and when guns may be carried. 

 

You forget the Supremes make the constitution a living document, and have found restrictions of certain weapons is consistent with the 2nd.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SloopJonB said:

Are you competing with Mo for "Dumbest asshole on SA"?

There are several contestants in the race at the moment, can any of them dethrone Happy Hillarkey? They are certainly giving it their best try.

Stay tuned for more hijinks from the "Bubbling Under the 100 IQ Contest!"

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SloopJonB said:
11 hours ago, Mohammed Bin Lyin said:

28279095_991257737695410_1502630171391796383_n.jpg

Keeriste you are an ignorant asshole.

 

When you resort to abuse it shows you have lost the debate and you have nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites