Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

My wife is giving us constant harassment about my lack of personal protection from boat shop customers.  but.... Since mid January, lI have had  a big yellow caution tape stretched across the d

Must really piss you off that Trump is hitting primarily blue states with his virus.

Planning a party?

Posted Images

More @dog statistics 

 

the numbers are too big to elicit real feelings about each dead person 

for some reason, four guys at Bengazi mean more than even one percent of 2,620 she died from Denier Don’s failure to respond 

 

@dog will be defending his absurdity 

 

Location   Cases Recovered Deaths
United States
United States
 
27.9M
27,900,000
+71,874
-
493K
493,000
+2,620
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Raz'r said:

Years of the elk post-Reagan saying the govt is inept and can do nothing right(except military and prisons) 

then, we actually DO have an inept govt, they be all “it was MAGA”

they got some funny definitions of what works and what doesnt

unemployment.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Dog,

Why aren't there 51 entries.  You cherry-picked the best red states and the worst blue states to graph you four-legged disingenuous fuck.  I'm sure with all the tourism-related layoffs, FL wouldn't look too good on this chart.  If I'm grading you, Incomplete or if you prefer, a solid 'F'.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Cal20sailor said:

So Dog,

Why aren't there 51 entries.  You cherry-picked the best red states and the worst blue states to graph you four-legged disingenuous fuck.

It graph reads "best and worst" you stupid half-wit. :lol:

  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Venom said:

It graph reads "best and worst" you stupid half-wit. :lol:

Asswipe, plot all 51 and let me draw the conclusions.  I hate when people filter data and try to make a point. 

"It graph?"  I love your gooder use of the English language.   

Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Cal20sailor said:

So Dog,

Why aren't there 51 entries.  You cherry-picked the best red states and the worst blue states to graph you four-legged disingenuous fuck.  I'm sure with all the tourism-related layoffs, FL wouldn't look too good on this chart.  If I'm grading you, Incomplete or if you prefer, a solid 'F'.

Were you really an engineer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, for 30yrs.  Interesting that you post the graph, I comment a few minutes later, and then Venom replies a minute later.  Why do you use two user names, your both assholes, why not just use one or the other?  That or you're banging him and you both got up at the same time. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Cal20sailor said:

Yes, for 30yrs.  Interesting that you post the graph, I comment a few minutes later, and then Venom replies a minute later.  Why do you use two user names, your both assholes, why not just use one or the other?  That or you're banging him and you both got up at the same time. 

Really, you find it interesting that other people chime in?

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Cal20sailor said:

Blue states on the left, red on the right.  Would you rather have a state with a higher contribution to GDP (these are 3rd qtr 2020, in millions) or a lower unemployment rate?  Looks like states that voted red are not pulling their weight, fucking deadbeats.

image.thumb.png.7db8e45324df9787e64e8572952b3417.png

states gdp.pdf

statesgdp.pdf

I'm finding it harder to believe you were an engineer. You might as well have ranked the states by population.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dog said:

Nonsense

And more people in Texas voted for Biden  than in any state other than California when Texas goes Blue, our country will start rapidly moving forward again 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Gouvernail said:

And more people in Texas voted for Biden  than in any state other than California when Texas goes Blue, our country will start rapidly moving forward again 

Like California.

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Ease the sheet. said:

American life expectancy seems to have taken a bit of a hit under Trump...  

Yep - it peaked in '14 and has been in decline since. It wasn't that great even then.

It's currently in 37th place. 47th place for infant mortality.

Probably a result of having the best health care system in the world, ever.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/17/2020 at 8:13 AM, Gouvernail said:

We need a daily reminder. The names of “people Trump killed today” should be read aloud every day on Radio and TV. 

89,420.  Dead Americans So far 
+1,231  Were killed Saturday
 
 

Back to the roots of the thread. 
 

and today...

Location   Cases Recovered Deaths
United States
 
28M
28,000,000
+78,018
-
496K
496,000
+2,626
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Dog said:

Like California.

California has a vast and diverse population.  Income inequality remains an issue.  But the ability to assimilate disparate populations is a beacon for the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, hasher said:

California has a vast and diverse population.  Income inequality remains an issue.  But the ability to assimilate disparate populations is a beacon for the future.

California has it all, climate, beautiful topography, resources, name it California has it. But it's a one party Democratic state. Consequently it has a high cost of living, high rate of poverty and homelessness, poor schools, crippling regulation...so people and businesses are leaving. Democrats want to make America a one party Democratic country.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And for some optimistic news...

"Dr. Marty Makary, a surgeon and a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, believes that the coronavirus will be "mostly gone" by April.

In an op-ed published by The Wall Street Journal on Friday, Makary argued that half of the U.S. has already reached herd immunity because there are more coronavirus cases in the country, possibly 6.5 times as many, than the 28 million that have been reported.

Combined with the 15 percent of Americans who have already begun receiving the vaccine, the doctor argued that normal life will return by the spring".

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Dog said:

And for some optimistic news...

"Dr. Marty Makary, a surgeon and a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, believes that the coronavirus will be "mostly gone" by April.

In an op-ed published by The Wall Street Journal on Friday, Makary argued that half of the U.S. has already reached herd immunity because there are more coronavirus cases in the country, possibly 6.5 times as many, than the 28 million that have been reported.

Combined with the 15 percent of Americans who have already begun receiving the vaccine, the doctor argued that normal life will return by the spring".

@Dog’s post was copied here so we can compare it to statements by his idol the Lying Loser Narcissist 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No big deal!! There aren’t even Half a million Dead Americans yet. 
 

Apparently Mozambican folks are dying at a much more alarming number but..

who cares?? @Dog  And his ilk PROUDLY consider call that place to be a shithole country ...

they all voted for a guy to be POTUS. especially because that fella “said it like it is.”


golly whiz!! Those.kakistocracy members sure are nice 
 

Location   Cases Recovered Deaths
United States
 
28.1M
28,100,000
+69,740
-
497K
497,000
+1,831
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Dog said:

New cases are less than a third of what they were just a month ago. Here's hoping we're seeing the end of this nightmare. 

You won't see the end of this nightmare until most of your population is vaccinated.

You may see the slowing of the rate of infection and death but when a handful of cases can blow out to 800 deaths within weeks when hospitals ARE coping as we saw here in Victoria. Sadly unless you lockdown entirely for at least a few weeks, nope. you havent seen the end by a long mile yet. You'll simply see a fall in the infection rate and death of those who can afford to keep themselves safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites


Maybe doggie has a deal where he guys to chew the bones???

Location   Cases Recovered Deaths
United States
 
28.1M
28,100,000
+55,195
-
499K
499,000
+1,247
Link to post
Share on other sites

500k

The death toll is larger than the total number of U.S. soldiers killed in action in World War I, World War II, and the Vietnam War combined. It comes just one year after the country's first coronavirus death was confirmed.

The one fuckwit responsible lost the election he was so desperate to win that he ignored all advice and pretended it wasn't a big deal.

When is he going to jail, simple question really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice work @Dog !!!! 
You have stood by your idol as his incompetence and conceit caused more than twice as many deaths in the USA than in ANY OTHER COUNTRY.

It wasn’t easy. The USA had a fantastic medical system and almost three months earning before the first infections were found in our country. 
 

Denial turned out to be a lousy vaccine, and bragging did nothing to help the medical community. 

 

Look at Dog’s numbers.  Can he stand wrong better than anybody?? 
 

Location   Cases Recovered Deaths
United States
 
28.2M
28,200,000
+59,462
-
500K
500,000
+1,454
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Gouvernail said:

Nice work @Dog !!!! 
You have stood by your idol as his incompetence and conceit caused more than twice as many deaths in the USA than in ANY OTHER COUNTRY.

It wasn’t easy. The USA had a fantastic medical system and almost three months earning before the first infections were found in our country. 
 

Denial turned out to be a lousy vaccine, and bragging did nothing to help the medical community. 

 

Look at Dog’s numbers.  Can he stand wrong better than anybody?? 
 

Location   Cases Recovered Deaths
United States
 
28.2M
28,200,000
+59,462
-
500K
500,000
+1,454

Three months warning.... Got a cite for that? In case you're interested in facts...

Thursday Jan 30, 2020 WHO confirms human to human transmission.

Friday Jan 31, 2020. Trump issues travel ban on visitors from china and quarantine for returning Americans. That's not 3 months, it's one day. (A decision which BTW, was deemed xenophobic by Joe Biden)

Trump Bans Travel from China, Orders 1st Quarantine in 50 Years (westernjournal.com)

Archived: WHO Timeline - COVID-19

Link to post
Share on other sites

In case anyone is interested in facts, instead of the false narrative above:

It wasn't a "ban", and was totally ineffective in the way it was organised.

“There’s no restriction on Americans going back and forth,” Klain said. “There are warnings. People should abide by those warnings. But today, 30 planes will land in Los Angeles that either originated in Beijing or came here on one-stops, 30 in San Francisco, 25 in New York City. Okay? So, unless we think that the color of the passport someone carries is a meaningful public health restriction, we have not placed a meaningful public health restriction.”

It was never deemed xenophobic by Joe Biden:

“You know we have right now a crisis with the coronavirus, emanating from China,” Biden tells supporters. “The national emergency and worldwide alerts. The American people need to have a president who they can trust what he says about it. That he is going to act rationally about it. In moments like this, this is where the credibility of a president is most needed, as he explains what we should and should not do. This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysterical xenophobia and fear mongering to lead the way instead of science.”

Keep it up, bullshitter.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Grrr... said:

In case anyone is interested in facts, instead of the false narrative above:

It wasn't a "ban", and was totally ineffective in the way it was organised.

“There’s no restriction on Americans going back and forth,” Klain said. “There are warnings. People should abide by those warnings. But today, 30 planes will land in Los Angeles that either originated in Beijing or came here on one-stops, 30 in San Francisco, 25 in New York City. Okay? So, unless we think that the color of the passport someone carries is a meaningful public health restriction, we have not placed a meaningful public health restriction.”

It was never deemed xenophobic by Joe Biden:

“You know we have right now a crisis with the coronavirus, emanating from China,” Biden tells supporters. “The national emergency and worldwide alerts. The American people need to have a president who they can trust what he says about it. That he is going to act rationally about it. In moments like this, this is where the credibility of a president is most needed, as he explains what we should and should not do. This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysterical xenophobia and fear mongering to lead the way instead of science.”

Keep it up, bullshitter.

Dog loves to use the word "ban", even though it has been pointed out many times that is NOT what was enacted.

But, he won't stop using it.  The word used in that way is deceitful.  That he KNOWS the word "ban" does not accurately reflect what was enacted means he is knowingly attempting to deceive people.

Is there a word for that type of thing?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

Dog loves to use the word "ban", even though it has been pointed out many times that is NOT what was enacted.

But, he won't stop using it.  The word used in that way is deceitful.  That he KNOWS the word "ban" does not accurately reflect what was enacted means he is knowingly attempting to deceive people.

Is there a word for that type of thing?

Truthiness?

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Grrr... said:
1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

Dog loves to use the word "ban", even though it has been pointed out many times that is NOT what was enacted.

But, he won't stop using it.  The word used in that way is deceitful.  That he KNOWS the word "ban" does not accurately reflect what was enacted means he is knowingly attempting to deceive people.

Is there a word for that type of thing?

Truthiness?

I was thinking more on the other end of the scale.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

Dog loves to use the word "ban", even though it has been pointed out many times that is NOT what was enacted.

But, he won't stop using it.  The word used in that way is deceitful.  That he KNOWS the word "ban" does not accurately reflect what was enacted means he is knowingly attempting to deceive people.

Is there a word for that type of thing?

Did it ban Chinese from traveling from main land China to the US or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Dog said:

Did it ban Chinese from traveling from main land China to the US or not?

Is your google broken?

First, take a look at the "travel ban" ... count the loop holes.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, hereby find that the unrestricted entry into the United States of persons described in section 1 of this proclamation would, except as provided for in section 2 of this proclamation, be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and that their entry should be subject to certain restrictions, limitations, and exceptions.  I therefore hereby proclaim the following:

Section 1Suspension and Limitation on Entry.   The entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of all aliens who were physically present within the People’s Republic of China, excluding the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau, during the 14-day period preceding their entry or attempted entry into the United States is hereby suspended and limited subject to section 2 of this proclamation.

Sec. 2Scope of Suspension and Limitation on Entry.

(a)  Section 1 of this proclamation shall not apply to:

(i)     any lawful permanent resident of the United States;

(ii)    any alien who is the spouse of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident;

(iii)   any alien who is the parent or legal guardian of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, provided that the U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident is unmarried and under the age of 21;

(iv)    any alien who is the sibling of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, provided that both are unmarried and under the age of 21;

(v)     any alien who is the child, foster child, or ward of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, or who is a prospective adoptee seeking to enter the United States pursuant to the IR-4 or IH-4 visa classifications;

(vi)    any alien traveling at the invitation of the United States Government for a purpose related to containment or mitigation of the virus;

(vii)   any alien traveling as a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(C) or (D) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(C) or (D), as a crewmember or any alien otherwise traveling to the United States as air or sea crew;

(viii)  any alien seeking entry into or transiting the United States pursuant to an A-1, A-2, C-2, C-3 (as a foreign government official or immediate family member of an official), G-1, G-2, G-3, G-4, NATO-1 through NATO-4, or NATO-6 visa;

(ix)    any alien whose entry would not pose a significant risk of introducing, transmitting, or spreading the virus, as determined by the CDC Director, or his designee;

(x)     any alien whose entry would further important United States law enforcement objectives, as determined by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or their respective designees based on a recommendation of the Attorney General or his designee; or

(xi)    any alien whose entry would be in the national interest, as determined by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or their designees.

(b)  Nothing in this proclamation shall be construed to affect any individual’s eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the regulations issued pursuant to the legislation implementing the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, consistent with the laws and regulations of the United States.

- DSK

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Steam Flyer said:

Is your google broken?

First, take a look at the "travel ban" ... count the loop holes.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, hereby find that the unrestricted entry into the United States of persons described in section 1 of this proclamation would, except as provided for in section 2 of this proclamation, be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and that their entry should be subject to certain restrictions, limitations, and exceptions.  I therefore hereby proclaim the following:

Section 1Suspension and Limitation on Entry.   The entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of all aliens who were physically present within the People’s Republic of China, excluding the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau, during the 14-day period preceding their entry or attempted entry into the United States is hereby suspended and limited subject to section 2 of this proclamation.

Sec. 2Scope of Suspension and Limitation on Entry.

(a)  Section 1 of this proclamation shall not apply to:

(i)     any lawful permanent resident of the United States;

(ii)    any alien who is the spouse of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident;

(iii)   any alien who is the parent or legal guardian of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, provided that the U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident is unmarried and under the age of 21;

(iv)    any alien who is the sibling of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, provided that both are unmarried and under the age of 21;

(v)     any alien who is the child, foster child, or ward of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, or who is a prospective adoptee seeking to enter the United States pursuant to the IR-4 or IH-4 visa classifications;

(vi)    any alien traveling at the invitation of the United States Government for a purpose related to containment or mitigation of the virus;

(vii)   any alien traveling as a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(C) or (D) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(C) or (D), as a crewmember or any alien otherwise traveling to the United States as air or sea crew;

(viii)  any alien seeking entry into or transiting the United States pursuant to an A-1, A-2, C-2, C-3 (as a foreign government official or immediate family member of an official), G-1, G-2, G-3, G-4, NATO-1 through NATO-4, or NATO-6 visa;

(ix)    any alien whose entry would not pose a significant risk of introducing, transmitting, or spreading the virus, as determined by the CDC Director, or his designee;

(x)     any alien whose entry would further important United States law enforcement objectives, as determined by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or their respective designees based on a recommendation of the Attorney General or his designee; or

(xi)    any alien whose entry would be in the national interest, as determined by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or their designees.

(b)  Nothing in this proclamation shall be construed to affect any individual’s eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the regulations issued pursuant to the legislation implementing the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, consistent with the laws and regulations of the United States.

- DSK

Exceptions that prove the rule... it was a ban.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dog said:

Exceptions that prove the rule... it was a ban.

How many tens of thousands of people came into the US from China, originating in the Wuhan/Hubei province, in the next month after this "ban"?

- DSK

Link to post
Share on other sites

All of you are banned from coming here.  Except those that aren't.

Because we all know the virus could not possibly be brought here by those permitted to come here under the "ban".

He slammed the screen door.  He slammed it very strongly.  Many people are saying it.  The best people.  The very best people.  Belief me.  Bigly.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bus Driver said:

All of you are banned from coming here.  Except those that aren't.

Because we all know the virus could not possibly be brought here by those permitted to come here under the "ban".

He slammed the screen door.  He slammed it very strongly.  Many people are saying it.  The best people.  The very best people.  Belief me.  Bigly.

Was there a ban or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Dog said:

Was there a ban or not?

The Former Guy called it a ban.  You do, as well.  But, "restrictions" would be a more accurate description of what was put in place. 

For a guy who insists on word specificity, you are curiously accepting of a misused label, in this case.  Wouldn't be because you feel the need to continue to defend the defeated ex-President, would it?

Is it a "ban" if it have loads of exceptions?

Is a "ban" effective if it allows people in who could carry the risk the "ban" is intended to eliminate?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bus Driver said:

The Former Guy called it a ban.  You do, as well.  But, "restrictions" would be a more accurate description of what was put in place. 

For a guy who insists on word specificity, you are curiously accepting of a misused label, in this case.  Wouldn't be because you feel the need to continue to defend the defeated ex-President, would it?

Is it a "ban" if it have loads of exceptions?

Is a "ban" effective if it allows people in who could carry the risk the "ban" is intended to eliminate?

It was a ban and your the one being disingenuous.

Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Dog said:

Did it ban Chinese from traveling from main land China to the US or not?

No.  If the Chinese held a green card, they were allowed to travel to the US.  Keep playing the semantics game.

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Dog said:

Exceptions that prove the rule... it was a ban.

So if I say no one under 21 can drink in my bar, unless they are a hot chick, that's the exception that proves the rule?

Such a fun game you play.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Grrr... said:

No.  If the Chinese held a green card, they were allowed to travel to the US.  Keep playing the semantics game.

OFGS....Of course legal residents an citizens had to be exempted. That does not mean there was no ban. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Grrr... said:

So if I say no one under 21 can drink in my bar, unless they are a hot chick, that's the exception that proves the rule?

Such a fun game you play.

And you think I'm playing semantic games.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Dog said:

It was a ban and your the one being disingenuous.

As someone else pointed out, your ability to be remarkably obtuse, then suddenly become laser focused is astounding.  It's almost like you have some type of motivation to not tell the truth.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Grrr... said:

As someone else pointed out, your ability to be remarkably obtuse, then suddenly become laser focused is astounding.  It's almost like you have some type of motivation to not tell the truth.

Dude...there was a ban.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Grrr... said:

As someone else pointed out, your ability to be remarkably obtuse, then suddenly become laser focused is astounding.  It's almost like you have some type of motivation to not tell the truth.

Precisely the reason he will avoid questions asking him to take a position.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a ban of people who were banned.  But, the ban did not ban other people.

The ban was intended to prevent a virus coming here from China.

Thousands of people who may have been infected were allowed in, in spite of the "ban".

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:
17 minutes ago, Dog said:

Was there a ban or not?

The Former Guy called it a ban.  You do, as well.  But, "restrictions" would be a more accurate description of what was put in place. 

For a guy who insists on word specificity, you are curiously accepting of a misused label, in this case.  Wouldn't be because you feel the need to continue to defend the defeated ex-President, would it?

Is it a "ban" if it have loads of exceptions?

Is a "ban" effective if it allows THOUSANDS OF people in who could carry the risk the "ban" is intended to eliminate?

And does not bother to keep track of TENS OF THOUSANDS of people who came in anyway?

Hello?? Hello, Dog??? Anybody home?

- DSK

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

Precisely the reason he will avoid questions asking him to take a position.  

You mean like when he refused to answer whether he thinks homosexuality is a mental disease, after he already stated that being transgender is?  Yeah, that's dog to a "T".

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

There was a ban of people who were banned.  But, the ban did not ban other people.

The ban was intended to prevent a virus coming here from China.

Thousands of people who may have been infected were allowed in, in spite of the "ban".

So if there was a ban, and there was, why do you have a problem with me saying so? It's a bit weird.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Grrr... said:

You mean like when he refused to answer whether he thinks homosexuality is a mental disease, after he already stated that being transgender is?  Yeah, that's dog to a "T".

Sorry I missed that. Homosexuality is not a disease. Gender dysphoria is.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dog said:

So if there was a ban, and there was, why do you have a problem with me saying so? It's a bit weird.

Just because The Former Guy called it a "ban", and being the loyal sycophant, you do the same, does not make it so.

It was a series of Restrictions on travel.  See Post # 3058.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bus Driver said:

Just because The Former Guy called it a "ban", and being the loyal sycophant, you do the same, does not make it so.

It was a series of Restrictions on travel.  See Post # 3058.

Were people banned?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dog said:

So if there was a ban, and there was, why do you have a problem with me saying so? It's a bit weird.

So, just today, you've been bitch slapped for lying about Martin Luther King.  Kicked in the nuts for mislabeling transgenders.  And disproven after calling something a 'ban' that clearly had so many exceptions that it didn't qualify as a ban at all.  Do you get a free knife set if you go 4 for 4?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Grrr... said:

So, just today, you've been bitch slapped for lying about Martin Luther King.  Kicked in the nuts for mislabeling transgenders.  And disproven after calling something a 'ban' that clearly had so many exceptions that it didn't qualify as a ban at all.  Do you get a free knife set if you go 4 for 4?

I didn't lie about Dr. King. I didn't mislable anyone and a ban is a ban.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dog said:

Sorry I missed that. Homosexuality is not a disease. Gender dysphoria is.

Do you still believe that gender dysphoria applies to all transgenders, when one of the leading experts in medical knowledge says it doesn't?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Grrr... said:

Do you still believe that gender dysphoria applies to all transgenders, when one of the leading experts in medical knowledge says it doesn't?

No they don't

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dog said:

No they don't

Mayo clinic. 

Transgender and gender-nonconforming people might experience gender dysphoria at some point in their lives. But not everyone is affected.

You're a liar.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Dog said:

Were people banned?

Some were restricted from traveling from the affected area.  Others weren't.

"Restriction" is a better description of what was enacted.

See Post #3058 for the facts.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Grrr... said:

Haley then asks: "Do you feel it's fair to request a multibillion-dollar program of preferential treatment for the Negro, or for any other minority group?"

King: I do indeed.

Dude... I did not attribute the quote you cited to King. It came from the Edmonton school board issue and I provided a link.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Dog said:

Sorry I missed that. Homosexuality is not a disease. Gender dysphoria is.

Don't try to play Psychology expert. You don’t know shit.

 

Genderdysphoria is one of those made up mental illnesses that only exists on closed  minds.

 

The fact is, when a person tells you his/ her mind dies not match his/ her physical parts, the person is merely stating fact. 
 

Ignorant folks like @Dog have the temerity to assume those people are wrong and therefore mentally ill.

the illness is enjoyed by folks like @Dog who are incapable of understanding minds and bodies are not always paired as the same sex 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Gouvernail said:

Don't try to play Psychology expert. You don’t know shit.

 

Genderdysphoria is one of those made up mental illnesses that only exists on closed  minds.

 

The fact is, when a person tells you his/ her mind dies not match his/ her physical parts, the person is merely stating fact. 
 

Ignorant folks like @Dog have the temerity to assume those people are wrong and therefore mentally ill.

the illness is enjoyed by folks like @Dog who are incapable of understanding minds and bodies are not always paired as the same sex 

You want to handle this one Grrr?

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Dog said:

Were people banned?

You tell us... tens of thousands of people travelled into the US from the affected area with no ability by any US agency to either test them or keep track of them.

Meanwhile, I posted Trump's actual order. Given the number of exceptions and loop holes, do you feel comfortable calling it a "ban" for any other reason than that's what Trump Himself calls it?

Is letting tens of thousands of possibly-infected people in, from the area you're claiming to have a travel "ban", really a ban? Perhaps you need an actual dictionary?

- DSK

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Steam Flyer said:

You tell us... tens of thousands of people travelled into the US from the affected area with no ability by any US agency to either test them or keep track of them.

Meanwhile, I posted Trump's actual order. Given the number of exceptions and loop holes, do you feel comfortable calling it a "ban" for any other reason than that's what Trump Himself calls it?

Is letting tens of thousands of possibly-infected people in, from the area you're claiming to have a travel "ban", really a ban? Perhaps you need an actual dictionary?

- DSK

That it is necessary to have exceptions does not mean there is no ban.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Dog said:

That it is necessary to have exceptions does not mean there is no ban.

In which Dog continues to insist that his use of words is always correct and that definitions, if different from dictionary or otherwise generally accepted by the English speaking population, should conform to his meaning of the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Dog said:

That it is necessary to have exceptions does not mean there is no ban.

In situations in which a noncooperative speaker is well-informed about the world, on the other hand, vagueness can be a deception mechanism. We distinguish two cases of that sort: cases in which the speaker is deliberately imprecise in order to hide information from the hearer; and cases in which the speaker exploits the semantic indeterminacy of vague predicates to produce utterances that are true in one sense, but false in another.

Damn.  They've even done studies on people like you.

Bullshitter.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/19/2021 at 6:24 AM, Dog said:

Worst hit....NY nursing homes

You do know that simply throwing meat on the street has no meaning.

My very conservative sister finds the restrictions on my parents and their visitors more harsh than necessary.  And yet they live.

Do you know how to balance on a log floating on a river?

Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Grrr... said:

In situations in which a noncooperative speaker is well-informed about the world, on the other hand, vagueness can be a deception mechanism. We distinguish two cases of that sort: cases in which the speaker is deliberately imprecise in order to hide information from the hearer; and cases in which the speaker exploits the semantic indeterminacy of vague predicates to produce utterances that are true in one sense, but false in another.

Damn.  They've even done studies on people like you.

Bullshitter.

The ban exists...Unambiguous enough?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Grrr... said:

Huh.  I wonder if they found the chick with the golf club yet.

She moved on.  It is sad and he is one of the best golfers that ever existed.  

Link to post
Share on other sites