Jump to content

Black Lives Matter


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

According to the police report the statue slipped and fell into the river.

LOL...really...LOL...one of the lefts favorite rants is against privatized prisons...

Posted Images

1 minute ago, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

Explain to us, again, what you think speech rights are liar.

i get you are just a sad troll, but it’s where the funny is.

You got nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

You support government violation of speech rights, liar.

You lambast supposed ANTIFA violating imaginary speech rights.

You are an unamerican fool.

You call yourself liberal...I wish you were.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

Yeah - you are really good at kissing Commie ass to make a buck I suppose they’ll pick more innocents to detain. Maybe you can rape a Uighur next trip.

You really are a sad little boi.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Shortforbob said:

 

Why are non of the mainstream media carrying this story?

Because black lives dont matter 

Why is the right using this tragedy to further their agenda?

Because he was black, dead and convenient..and it doesn't matter.

And they can lie about and sensationalise his death, because it doesn't matter.

Agree with all.  Just like the left uses every similar tragedy to further their agenda, because they are were black, dead and convenient.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Dog said:

I am opposed to violence. Particularly against people simply exercising their speech rights.

So, you are opposed to President Trump's use of "federal troops" in Portland.  I must have missed your expressions of opposition.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bus Driver said:

So, you are opposed to President Trump's use of "federal troops" in Portland.  I must have missed your expressions of opposition.

So, vandalizing federal property is actually a freedom of speech issue, Mr. School Teacher?

Wow, learn something every day. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

So, you are opposed to President Trump's use of "federal troops" in Portland.  I must have missed your expressions of opposition.

No... I support the use of "federal agents" to protect federal property.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dog said:

No... I support the use of "federal agents" to protect federal property.

You support Trumps little mushroom while you lick it.

Tell us all Doggy, how do you get fed the line to follow for the day?   Is it just Fox News or do you subscribe to some RW nut job site?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see Mikey the lying shill cunt is still doing the "Oh looky over there!   China is doing some bad things ..."

While his own government is systematically dismantling his own country.

What a fucking terrorist.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, astro said:

You support Trumps little mushroom while you lick it.

Are you also into gay porn, Astro?  

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Burning Man said:

Agree with all.  Just like the left uses

Jeffy, you have degenerated into more of a right wing repeating station than you every were.

You are seemingly no longer able to see any event through any sort of lens other than the Left/Right lens.

See how that's working out for your cuntry.

Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Dog said:

No... I support the use of "federal agents" to protect federal property.

From graffiti?

You support kidnapping, beating, and gassing, peaceful protestors to "protect" federal property from the people who paid for it in the first place.

- DSK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Over the years, law enforcement have learned that de-escalating in certain situations is the best course of action.

NOT chasing a fleeing vehicle (high-speed chase) in certain situations is one example.

Better communication and negotiations with barricaded subjects, instead of shock/awe attacks.

There's 1000 ways to deal with these situations.  

Trump is choosing the one that benefits himself politically, NOT what's best for the nation.

Typical Trump.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Mike G said:

Over the years, law enforcement have learned that de-escalating in certain situations is the best course of action.

NOT chasing a fleeing vehicle (high-speed chase) in certain situations is one example.

Better communication and negotiations with barricaded subjects, instead of shock/awe attacks.

There's 1000 ways to deal with these situations.  

Trump is choosing the one that benefits himself politically, NOT what's best for the nation.

Typical Trump.

 

How should we prevent rioters from damaging public property?

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, El Boracho said:

^^^ Same as at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Do nothing, just watch, swallow the millions in damage.

Just let them trash public property...that's your plan?

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Dog said:

Just let them trash public property...that's your plan?

No. De-escalate. Sure, arrest any serious vandals. Deter the others. Guard the doors to federal buildings. Declaring protestors to be terrorists is not helpful. Camo-clad thugs are not needed. Regular publicly accountable city police can take care of the situation. But hey, there is the election and the TV news cycle....

Trump makes everything worse.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, El Boracho said:

No. De-escalate. Sure, arrest any serious vandals. Deter the others. Guard the doors to federal buildings. Declaring protestors to be terrorists is not helpful. Camo-clad thugs are not needed. Regular publicly accountable city police can take care of the situation. But hey, there is the election and the TV news cycle....

Trump makes everything worse.

There's people that are trained in de-escalating.  They learn it, and do it, for the better of all parties involved.

There's also people that need to cater to their base.  Idiots that need to show other idiots that not only are they an idiot, but they can out-idiot anybody else and they deserve

the idiot vote.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Who would have thought that having law enforcement treating people like shit at a rally protesting law enforcement treating people like shit wouldn't go over well.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Public "Hey guys....we feel that law enforcement has been treating minorities unfairly. The football q.b. guy tried to get the point across, but it didnt really work out well for him.  So we're protesting across the nation.  We'd  really appreciate it if, during the year-long training process for deputies that you would work into the curriculum the part about fairness to all races and genders more.  And get the D.A.'s to fairly charge based on the offense instead of the race.  That ok?"

L.E.  "We hear you...and we get it.  To show just how much we get it we're bringing in soldiers with zero police training to bust heads and pepper spray anybody we fucking feel like pepper spraying.  And we are hiding the identity of not only the officers but the agency they're with as well.  So theres no accountability.  Have a nice day."

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mike G said:

Public "Hey guys....we feel that law enforcement has been treating minorities unfairly. The football q.b. guy tried to get the point across, but it didnt really work out well for him.  So we're protesting across the nation.  We'd  really appreciate it if, during the year-long training process for deputies that you would work into the curriculum the part about fairness to all races and genders more.  And get the D.A.'s to fairly charge based on the offense instead of the race.  That ok?"

L.E.  "We hear you...and we get it.  To show just how much we get it we're bringing in soldiers with zero police training to bust heads and pepper spray anybody we fucking feel like pepper spraying.  And we are hiding the identity of not only the officers but the agency they're with as well.  So theres no accountability.  Have a nice day."

The real shame of it is, the 'federal agents' carrying out this policy will probably not get the pitchfork in the first wave

- DSK

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Venom said:

Black lives matter except for when they don't. 

115995718_10223095461443686_805964145152

 

Obviously didn't matter to you, given it's already days old and you've just discovered it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mid said:

Obviously didn't matter to you, given it's already days old and you've just discovered it. 

True, I just discovered it. Oddly it didn't make the headlines on the corporate media news outlets. When did you find out? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, El Boracho said:

No. De-escalate. Sure, arrest any serious vandals. Deter the others. Guard the doors to federal buildings. Declaring protestors to be terrorists is not helpful. Camo-clad thugs are not needed. Regular publicly accountable city police can take care of the situation. But hey, there is the election and the TV news cycle....

Trump makes everything worse.

How about you just get in their way and stop them physically from trashing public property. Is there a problem with that?

It may not be polite but then the rioters intent on destruction don't seem interested in polite.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Mid said:

 

 

Oh, approx. a day before me and I didn’t see that you had already posted about it. My bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, d'ranger said:

Do you realize that everything you consume is opinion? Everyone has opinions and assholes, not all of them need to be seen.

Is it opinion that Portland police declared a riot?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

Was it justified? Properly predicated? Will the evidence hold up to scrutiny?

such a dumb fuck.

“In a statement, police said rioters threw rocks, bottles, launched "mortar style" fireworks into the space blocked by the fence, and tore down part of the fence with a chain".

Does that sound like a peaceful protest?

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Dog said:

Defending one small bit of ground is one thing, preventing a riot doing any damage is another. Have  you moved the goal posts because you can't find any occasion where a riot was prevented from doing any damage?  

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Dog said:

“In a statement, police said rioters threw rocks, bottles, launched "mortar style" fireworks into the space blocked by the fence, and tore down part of the fence with a chain".

Does that sound like a peaceful protest?

My goodness! It certainly doesn't sound peaceful to the be throwing rocks and bottles and "mortar style" fireworks... do they mean th kind of fireworks used to hold bricks together? ... into a space blocked by a fence... OTOH that doesn't sound like much of a threat to Federal property.

Who were these "police," exactly? The unidentified Federal troops, you mean? How come they're beating and gassing and kidnapping protestors who are neither attacking legitimate police nor federal property?

Sounds like an ugly situation

- DSK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Dog, I know this doesn't help your argument.

Anti-fascists linked to zero murders in the US in 25 years

Source: The Guardian

Donald Trump has made warnings about the threat of antifa and “far-left fascism” a central part of his re-election campaign. But in reality leftwing attacks have left far fewer people dead than violence by rightwing extremists, new research indicates, and antifa activists have not been linked to a single murder in decades. 

A new database of nearly 900 politically motivated attacks and plots in the United States since 1994 includes just one attack staged by an anti-fascist that led to fatalities. In that case, the single person killed was the perpetrator. 

Over the same time period, American white supremacists and other rightwing extremists have carried out attacks that left at least 329 victims dead, according to the database.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/27/us-rightwing-extremists-attacks-deaths-database-leftwing-antifa 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my!

Police: Richmond riots instigated by white supremacists disguised as Black Lives Matter

RICHMOND, Va. – Riots in downtown Richmond over the weekend were instigated by white supremacists under the guise of Black Lives Matter, according to law enforcement officials. 

Protesters tore down police tape and pushed forward toward Richmond police headquarters, where they set a city dump truck on fire. 

Police declared the event an “unlawful assembly” and ordered people to leave, later deploying tear gas. 

Six people were arrested. The mayor of Richmond thanked the Black Lives Matter protesters he said tried to stop the white supremacists from spearheading the violence. 

“Their mission is simple, not the Richmond we know,” said Mayor Levar Stoney. 



https://www.wsls.com/news/virginia/2020/07/27/police-richmond-riots-instigated-by-white-supremacists-disguised-as-black-lives-matter/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Peaceful protests responded to with violent reprisals at the hands of a secret police.  White supremacists instigating trouble, while posing as BLM.

Dog should be along shortly to spin this as no big deal.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, BravoBravo said:

Skin.jpg

So, how many people in your family have been lynched? How many times has your family's home been burned to the ground, and they (you) fled with nothing? How many times has your family had a business burned? How many years has your family paid excessive interest rates because banks knew they could refuse you altogether? Or paid excessive rent because landlords etc etc? College etc etc....

The black/white disparity in wealth and income is very largely a result of white supremacy and white privilege

- DSK

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Steam Flyer said:

So, how many people in your family have been lynched? How many times has your family's home been burned to the ground, and they (you) fled with nothing? How many times has your family had a business burned? How many years has your family paid excessive interest rates because banks knew they could refuse you altogether? Or paid excessive rent because landlords etc etc? College etc etc....

The black/white disparity in wealth and income is very largely a result of white supremacy and white privilege

- DSK

Crock of bullshit... 

  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BravoBravo said:
1 minute ago, Steam Flyer said:

So, how many people in your family have been lynched? How many times has your family's home been burned to the ground, and they (you) fled with nothing? How many times has your family had a business burned? How many years has your family paid excessive interest rates because banks knew they could refuse you altogether? Or paid excessive rent because landlords etc etc? College etc etc....

The black/white disparity in wealth and income is very largely a result of white supremacy and white privilege

- DSK

Crock of bullshit... 

OK, I'm waiting. You've had people in your family lynched?

Go ahead

- DSK

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Steam Flyer said:

OK, I'm waiting. You've had people in your family lynched?

Go ahead

- DSK

Like I said... a crock of bullshit 

each and every example 

  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, BravoBravo said:

Like I said... a crock of bullshit 

each and every example 

th?id=OIP.JM0SFoi8OdtBsAnoVaIgAgAAAA%26pid=Api&f=1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aww you poor poor thing, it's SO-O unfair!

I'm sorry I tried to give you a big mean old clue.... facts are such unpleasant things, no wonder CrybabyCrybaby avoids them like the plague..... oh wait.......

- DSK

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/25/2020 at 2:15 PM, Bus Driver said:

How would an article claiming the gate was broken by the protesters wanting to gain entrance to the street be more believable than a video that shows the gate fully intact and completely undamaged as the crowd passed through.

My money is on the McCloskeys either breaking the gate themselves, or getting someone to do it.  That would be to back up their claim the protesters broke it to gain entrance.

Which is a lie.

My money is also on them not testifying under oath.  If they truly felt their lives were in danger, and the story they told about the gate is true, they would.  But, if they tell that story under oath, and the video is shown, they will be charged with perjury.  Likely disbarred, as well.  Which is why they will plea this down.

I guess they had a key?  No one could have possibly bent that flimsy gate over on the way out (after timespan of that video)?   

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/27/2020 at 1:45 PM, Mark K said:

Defending one small bit of ground is one thing, preventing a riot doing any damage is another. Have  you moved the goal posts because you can't find any occasion where a riot was prevented from doing any damage?  

OFGS...How about the case in point, the federal court house in Portland.

Can you cite a case where not stopping a riot prevented the riot from doing damage.... Fuck me.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/27/2020 at 4:34 PM, Bus Driver said:

Peaceful protests responded to with violent reprisals at the hands of a secret police.  White supremacists instigating trouble, while posing as BLM.

Dog should be along shortly to spin this as no big deal.

There is no defending violence against peaceful protestors. Rioters, are a different story.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Dog said:
On 7/27/2020 at 4:34 PM, Bus Driver said:

Peaceful protests responded to with violent reprisals at the hands of a secret police.  White supremacists instigating trouble, while posing as BLM.

Dog should be along shortly to spin this as no big deal.

There is no defending violence against peaceful protestors. Rioters, are a different story.

To be clear, Federal "troops" were brought in because graffiti had been painted on the Federal Courthouse.  They are unnamed and unaccountable.  Their presence, and their hostile interactions with protesters, have escalated the tension.  They create a hostile situation and then capitalize on it by saying they need to squash the very situation they created.

I ask that you watch this and see if you believe they were in the right to shoot that man in the head.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xdjv_nSL5lg

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

To be clear, Federal "troops" were brought in because graffiti had been painted on the Federal Courthouse.  They are unnamed and unaccountable.  Their presence, and their hostile interactions with protesters, have escalated the tension.  They create a hostile situation and then capitalize on it by saying they need to squash the very situation they created.

I ask that you watch this and see if you believe they were in the right to shoot that man in the head.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xdjv_nSL5lg

Bullshit...They are there to protect federal property from an obvious threat by rioters. They have had bottles, stones, knives and fireworks thrown at them and lasers flashed in their eyes. You libs with your righteous war on cops are fucking up royally and it's the people you purport to be concerned about who will pay the price.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Dog said:

There is no defending violence against peaceful protestors. Rioters, are a different story.

Then why are you doing it?

I suppose the Wall Of Moms women were IYHO rioters who deserved to get shot in the head?

- DSK

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Steam Flyer said:

Then why are you doing it?

I suppose the Wall Of Moms women were IYHO rioters who deserved to get shot in the head?

- DSK

No one gives a fuck about "peaceful protesters."  If there were only peaceful protesters, we would have barely heard a word about it.  But instead, we have violent people committing actual murders, looting and property destruction.  That needs to be stopped in its tracks.

And if the wall of moms are blocking the highway, they need to be removed.  And they will determine how much force is necessary to remove them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Dog said:
30 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

To be clear, Federal "troops" were brought in because graffiti had been painted on the Federal Courthouse.  They are unnamed and unaccountable.  Their presence, and their hostile interactions with protesters, have escalated the tension.  They create a hostile situation and then capitalize on it by saying they need to squash the very situation they created.

I ask that you watch this and see if you believe they were in the right to shoot that man in the head.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xdjv_nSL5lg

Bullshit...They are there to protect federal property from an obvious threat by rioters. They have had bottles, stones, knives and fireworks thrown at them and lasers flashed in their eyes. You libs with your righteous war on cops are fucking up royally and it's the people you purport to be concerned about who will pay the price.

Bullshit.  What violence existed BEFORE the Federales showed up with weapons of war and little to no training in crowd control?

The protests were not violent.  The Mayor and Governor have asked the occupying force to leave.  They showed up, stirred the shit, and use that to justify their presence.

Now, care to opine on my request?  Bolded, above.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

Does this dumb motherfucker even know the first thing about Portland Oregon? Anything at all? Or is he convinced by the rightwing outrage sphere? He knows nothing about Minneapolis, and admits it. Just a stupid shitposting rightwing moron. Bungabunga style.

I know Portland and Minneapolis (and other Democratic cities) have high and rising crime rates while you idiots are at war with the one institution that can reduce It. All because you have been bullshitted into believing a systemic racism lie. Nice going.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

Bullshit.  What violence existed BEFORE the Federales showed up with weapons of war and little to no training in crowd control?

The protests were not violent.  The Mayor and Governor have asked the occupying force to leave.  They showed up, stirred the shit, and use that to justify their presence.

Now, care to opine on my request?  Bolded, above.

“Federal authorities have assembled a force of 114 federal officers to protect U.S. government buildings in Portland, Ore., in response to ongoing protests, unrest and violence there, as part of a mission dubbed “Operation Diligent Valor."

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/22/federal-government-assembles-force-portland-unrest-377785

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

Because police beat them up. what kind of dumb fucking white African doesn’t get police violence ain’t a long term solution?

Wrong....This is recreational destruction by sanctimonious white brats having a collective temper tantrum.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Dog said:
22 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

Bullshit.  What violence existed BEFORE the Federales showed up with weapons of war and little to no training in crowd control?

The protests were not violent.  The Mayor and Governor have asked the occupying force to leave.  They showed up, stirred the shit, and use that to justify their presence.

Now, care to opine on my request?  Bolded, above.

“Federal authorities have assembled a force of 114 federal officers to protect U.S. government buildings in Portland, Ore., in response to ongoing protests, unrest and violence there, as part of a mission dubbed “Operation Diligent Valor."

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/22/federal-government-assembles-force-portland-unrest-377785

Funny how you chose to ignore the very next sentence - "Details of the federal response were disclosed in a court filing."

That means the justification DHS gave is what you quoted.  Of course they are going to paint things in as negative light as possible to justify the illegal detention of citizens protesting.  Do you truly believe they would say anything other than that?

Since you seem to think the violence preceded the appearance of this occupying force, I guess you will be able to detail the many crimes with which the people have been charged.  You know, the people tossed into unmarked vans and swept away to undisclosed locations.  Surely they would have probable cause to detain them, right?  

Still, I will ask again, what do you think about the guy who got shot in the head while holding aloft a speaker?

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Dog said:

Wrong....This is recreational destruction by sanctimonious white brats having a collective temper tantrum.

Yah 

but still ...tear gas and batons don’t show well on YouTube 

And remember , that gas stuff contributes to global warming and burns residents eyes 

In future K-9 units,  with nice friendly dogs , should be used to gently herd these feral creatures out of town ,  into railway cars  , for  sequestration at camp covid 

It’s a win win

The feral creatures are off the streets ,safely  siloed behind  razor wire  , and can be used for vaccine experiments in these tough corona times 

A0F2E7D1-451E-4ED3-A7AB-CBCFCF3B5E3F.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

Funny how you chose to ignore the very next sentence - "Details of the federal response were disclosed in a court filing."

That means the justification DHS gave is what you quoted.  Of course they are going to paint things in as negative light as possible to justify the illegal detention of citizens protesting.  Do you truly believe they would say anything other than that?

Since you seem to think the violence preceded the appearance of this occupying force, I guess you will be able to detail the many crimes with which the people have been charged.  You know, the people tossed into unmarked vans and swept away to undisclosed locations.  Surely they would have probable cause to detain them, right?  

Still, I will ask again, what do you think about the guy who got shot in the head while holding aloft a speaker?

They are American federal agents in an American city how are they an occupying force?

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Dog said:

They are American federal agents in an American city how are they an occupying force?

They are anonymous agents brought in without proper training and zero accountability.  

Seriously, if something like this had happened under President Obama, you'd have lost your shit.

Any reason why you keep avoiding my question about your view of the guy getting shot in the head?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Dog said:

Wrong....This is recreational destruction by sanctimonious white brats having a collective temper tantrum.

As opposed those the brave freedom fighters who stormed their state capitols, while carrying firearms, to scream threats at their legislators and governors?

So far, it looks like most of the destruction has been carried out as false-flag ops by white supremacists.

- DSK

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bus Driver said:

Bullshit.  What violence existed BEFORE the Federales showed up with weapons of war and little to no training in crowd control?

The protests were not violent.  The Mayor and Governor have asked the occupying force to leave.  They showed up, stirred the shit, and use that to justify their presence.

Now, care to opine on my request?  Bolded, above.

Right after the George Floyd killing was there not looting, rioting, and murdering?  We can start with the flat screen TVs being looted out of the Target or the David Dorn killing.  Or, I think there are about 27 other deaths for you to choose from.

Wasn't there a Minneapolis police station set on fire by the peaceful protesters?  Whats that Trump's goons?

Note that none of this has anything to do with the appropriateness of the federal government sending in personnel.  This is about the role of the government to protect the people from violent people.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Steam Flyer said:

As opposed those the brave freedom fighters who stormed their state capitols, while carrying firearms, to scream threats at their legislators and governors?

So far, it looks like most of the destruction has been carried out as false-flag ops by white supremacists.

- DSK

We can handle situations like that appropriately as well.  Also, we could arrest every single "peaceful protester" that marched through that private subdivision.

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

They are anonymous agents brought in without proper training and zero accountability.  

Seriously, if something like this had happened under President Obama, you'd have lost your shit.

Any reason why you keep avoiding my question about your view of the guy getting shot in the head?

They are not a occupying force, they are Americans protecting American property in an American city.

They do not go out every night hunting protestors, the riot comes to them.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Steam Flyer said:

As opposed those the brave freedom fighters who stormed their state capitols, while carrying firearms, to scream threats at their legislators and governors?

So far, it looks like most of the destruction has been carried out as false-flag ops by white supremacists.

- DSK

In determining the proper course of actions to deal with the freedom fighters, what damage did they actually cause?  Did they trespass?  Misdemeanor trespass?  If so, that works for me.  Did they kill anyone?  Cause damage?

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Steam Flyer said:

As opposed those the brave freedom fighters who stormed their state capitols, while carrying firearms, to scream threats at their legislators and governors?

Poor Steamer, unable to deal with the fact that the protests in Michigan & Virginia didn't result in riots. Poor guy. Maybe they needed alot more "peaceful" lefty types to show up.

18 minutes ago, Steam Flyer said:

So far, it looks like most of the destruction has been carried out as false-flag ops by white supremacists.

iTs A cOnSpIrAcY.

You need to post a few more "this poor history professor was doing nothing wrong when she was attacked by feds" memes.

Be sure to leave out the videos of your "peaceful" protestors throwing bombs, firebombs, rocks, etc.

But it is rather interesting how the same people who get offended if Trump says something rude about a judge have absolutely nothing to say when the "peaceful" blackshirts start a riot  at a courthouse.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

Jerkz loves his authoritarianism

It is true.  We need a government for national defense, defense of the citizens both in their persons and property, for courts and even probably for environmental regulation.  In all of those areas, the government needs to have authority and force.  But only in those cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, bpm57 said:

Poor Steamer, unable to deal with the fact that the protests in Michigan & Virginia didn't result in riots. Poor guy. Maybe they needed alot more "peaceful" lefty types to show up.

iTs A cOnSpIrAcY.

You need to post a few more "this poor history professor was doing nothing wrong when she was attacked by feds" memes.

Be sure to leave out the videos of your "peaceful" protestors throwing bombs, firebombs, rocks, etc.

But it is rather interesting how the same people who get offended if Trump says something rude about a judge have absolutely nothing to say when the "peaceful" blackshirts start a riot  at a courthouse.

BTW, Do you think, under the strict application of the constitution that brown-skinned people have the right to carry 3/5ths of a gun?

 

(Was Bundy's takeover of Federal property in Oregon a riot or a rebellion.  I'm confused.)

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

Which is why you want people arrested for imaginary reasons.

I keep calling the cops on my neighbors lawn crew, but they won’t arrest them for trespassing. It’s almost like you are bullshitting, but you’d never do that would you Pooh fucker?

It is almost like you are a complete lying sack of shit.  Well, not almost.

Link to post
Share on other sites