Jump to content

Who wants to defund / abolish the police?


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Grrr... said:

It's really unfortunate that the police triggered the increase in homicide in 2020 through their targeted racism. 

There is no evidence for targeting.  It's naïve to expect that blacks with their higher crime rates will have the same rate of police involvement as other racial groups.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The foot soldiers that former President Trump sent to the Capitol used fire extinguishers to abolish the police. I’m guessing that Officer Sicknick’s family doesn’t support abolishing the police. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it should be refunded, and cops/police should use their minds not there battle gear.

It seems today police are too afraid to do their job , it's much easier to kill some one then to talk to them.

The latest a 9 year old handcuffed is pepper sprayed so 2 adult cops could get her in a car, as the were afraid for their life, WTF My suggestion to them is look for a new career.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Not for nothing said:

I think it should be refunded, and cops/police should use their minds not there battle gear.

It seems today police are too afraid to do their job , it's much easier to kill some one then to talk to them.

The latest a 9 year old handcuffed is pepper sprayed so 2 adult cops could get her in a car, as the were afraid for their life, WTF My suggestion to them is look for a new career.

Have you ever fought with a struggling 9 year old?  I have (to prevent him from hurting himself).  Fingernails and teeth can be nasty weapons.  It's amazingly difficult.

I think we've short changed our police.  They need non-lethal non-dangerous forms of crowd and personal control, and we just haven't delivered those to them.  Somehow we can spend trillions to make bombs that can hit a toothpick in a cave under a mountain, but we can't give cops something that incapacitates people safely.  Tasers were a start, but we HAVE to be able to do better than that.

The sick-sticks from Demolition man spring to mind.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dog said:

There is no evidence for targeting.  It's naïve to expect that blacks with their higher crime rates will have the same rate of police involvement as other racial groups.

Bullshit.

xEE.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Grrr... said:

Have you ever fought with a struggling 9 year old?  I have (to prevent him from hurting himself).  Fingernails and teeth can be nasty weapons.  It's amazingly difficult.

I think we've short changed our police.  They need non-lethal non-dangerous forms of crowd and personal control, and we just haven't delivered those to them. 

Wrong. It is extremely easy to control a struggling 9 year old for anyone with even a modicum of training. The obvious problem is that somehow cops are allowed to keep their jobs despite being slow, fat, and not keeping up on any training whatsoever. Wide consensus on this from the entire martial arts and military community. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, MR.CLEAN said:

Wrong. It is extremely easy to control a struggling 9 year old for anyone with even a modicum of training. The obvious problem is that somehow cops are allowed to keep their jobs despite being slow, fat, and not keeping up on any training whatsoever. Wide consensus on this from the entire martial arts and military community. 

Should we fund more education or more violence?  https://www.ajc.com/news/crime/apd-officers-fired-for-using-tasers-on-college-students-reinstated/U2D7PVGZGVAI3DYQHYQ5COVVU4/

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Grrr... said:

Have you ever fought with a struggling 9 year old?  I have (to prevent him from hurting himself).  Fingernails and teeth can be nasty weapons.  It's amazingly difficult.

I think we've short changed our police.  They need non-lethal non-dangerous forms of crowd and personal control, and we just haven't delivered those to them.  Somehow we can spend trillions to make bombs that can hit a toothpick in a cave under a mountain, but we can't give cops something that incapacitates people safely.  Tasers were a start, but we HAVE to be able to do better than that.

The sick-sticks from Demolition man spring to mind.

Cast Net

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6swnJXwEws

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Grrr... said:

Have you ever fought with a struggling 9 year old?  I have (to prevent him from hurting himself).  Fingernails and teeth can be nasty weapons.  It's amazingly difficult.

I think we've short changed our police.  They need non-lethal non-dangerous forms of crowd and personal control, and we just haven't delivered those to them.  Somehow we can spend trillions to make bombs that can hit a toothpick in a cave under a mountain, but we can't give cops something that incapacitates people safely.  Tasers were a start, but we HAVE to be able to do better than that.

The sick-sticks from Demolition man spring to mind.

First it was a 9 year old girl, which granted could be a hand full, that all she wanted was her father ( as most 9 yr girls want) and it was 3 adult male cops,

at on point :Three officers suspended after police pepper spray 9-year-old girl in Rochester, N.Y. (nbcnews.com)

“You’re acting like a child,” one of the officers says at one point.

“I am a child,” she can be heard responding.

so I agree that the police were in this case under trained, which is my point, I wonder if any of the officers had children, and how they would handle it at home?

So my ordinal statement don't defund the police refund them with training, 

Luckily in this case no one was killed

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Dog said:

The results are in, 2020 saw a 30 % increase in homicides despite a pandemic. The increase coincides with the BLM's war on police and the resulting defund the police movement. It coincides with less aggressive policing that shows up in a decline in stops and arrests.

Did anything else happen in 2020 that might have led to increased friction, or tension in society? Anything oppressive, or contributing to an economic slowdown? Anything that might have led to the usual predictors of crimes, such as food insecurity, homelessness, mental health crises and poor mental health care? 

Any interruption in educational or athletic opportunities that provide structure to young men’s lives, or  provide a safe outlet for energy and aggression?

Violence and homicide is best understood as a disease, one with risk factors, modifiable conditions and predictive circumstances.

It’s obvious to anyone seriously considering the subject that societal stressors and civilian health metrics were significantly altered by the pandemic.

To the extent that BLM recognized and spoke up for blacks who felt threatened not just by policing techniques and policies, but also threatened by an overt resurgence in white supremacy aided and abetted by our nations leaders, there was a racial element to crime last year.

But to completely ignore the impact of the pandemic on crime speaks either of raw stupidity or an asshole with a racist agenda.

Which motivation fuels @Dog I wonder?

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Dog said:

There is no evidence for targeting.  It's naïve to expect that blacks with their higher crime rates will have the same rate of police involvement as other racial groups.

You are lying, as usual. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, phillysailor said:

Did anything else happen in 2020 that might have led to increased friction, or tension in society? Anything oppressive, or contributing to an economic slowdown? Anything that might have led to the usual predictors of crimes, such as food insecurity, homelessness, mental health crises and poor mental health care? 

Any interruption in educational or athletic opportunities that provide structure to young men’s lives, or  provide a safe outlet for energy and aggression?

Violence and homicide is best understood as a disease, one with risk factors, modifiable conditions and predictive circumstances.

It’s obvious to anyone seriously considering the subject that societal stressors and civilian health metrics were significantly altered by the pandemic.

To the extent that BLM recognized and spoke up for blacks who felt threatened not just by policing techniques and policies, but also threatened by an overt resurgence in white supremacy aided and abetted by our nations leaders, there was a racial element to crime last year.

But to completely ignore the impact of the pandemic on crime speaks either of raw stupidity or an asshole with a racist agenda.

Which motivation fuels @Dog I wonder?

Like many things, they aren't mutually incompatible. However, the "asshole with a racist agenda" is certainly a big part of it. Some folks here say that Dog is smart, but I disagree. Maybe he used to be before the senility ramped up.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, mathystuff said:

My money is on him just liking the abuse.

If that's the case, I wish he would just stay in the basement and whack his dick with a rubber mallet instead of spewing garbage here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The results are in, 2020 saw a 30 % increase in homicides despite a pandemic. The increase coincides with the time when our solar system's two biggest worlds – the mighty Jupiter followed by the glorious ringed Saturn – appeared in the sky next to each other at their closest since 1623 and closest visible from Earth since the Middle Ages in 1226. This happened in 2020, during an event called a “great conjunction.”

(Insert eerie music here.)

Correlation does not imply causation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess we could go full Stazi and clamp down on all members of society in a misguided attempt to decrease crime. But you'd just shift the nature and instigators of crime, not really reduce its impact on society. There are certain deleterious effects of authoritarian and totalitarian governments which speak against this approach, much as some aggressively righty types might proclaim their virtues.

It's better to reduce the desire or perceived need of members of society to solve their problems with violence, and to afford them more options which help avoid criminality in general. A lot of simple behaviors or petty offenses are punished monetarily by cities and state, and then nonpayment punished according to a system of judicial culture and established sentencing patterns. Unfortunately, there is a profit motive for both the state and the for-profit prison industry which has driven incarceration rates to among the highest in the world. 

I guess @Dog doesn't have the mental honesty or fortitude to face up to this obvious example of socialism. Those who chant "law and order" and "support our troops" (not meaning veterans affairs but weapons purchases) are supporting the two biggest examples of socialism in America today. Too bad they won't see the hypocrisy.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Dog said:

There is no evidence for targeting.  It's naïve to expect that blacks with their higher crime rates will have the same rate of police involvement as other racial groups.

But there is evidence.

12 hours ago, Dog said:

The results are in, 2020 saw a 30 % increase in homicides despite a pandemic. The increase coincides with the BLM's war on police and the resulting defund the police movement. It coincides with less aggressive policing that shows up in a decline in stops and arrests.

The best, currently available evidence strongly supports the conclusion that the Great 2020 Homicide Spike resulted from the widespread anti-police protests, which in turn lead to a reduction in policing activity directed at fighting gun crimes. To save lives in 2021, we need urgent action to restore proactive policing to its pre-protest levels”.

Explaining the Great 2020 Homicide Spike – Reason.com

Of course the destructive effects of progressive hostility towards police is most severe for the minority communities of the nation's inner cities where a majority of the population does not want weakened policing.


And one good Reason article deserves two more. That one's not so good, IMO, advocating as it does for Bloomberg's failed stop and frisk programs. Those are where the stupid drug war meets the stupid gun war, and a prime example of the idea that we have a Stupid Party and an Evil Party in this country, and now and then they come up with something both stupid and evil and blessed bipartisan unity is achieved, making me long for gridlock.

7 Race-Neutral Solutions to Racially Skewed Law Enforcement

Racially Skewed Policing Is Not a Statistical Mirage

For those who object to the source, please just use Remodel's source, or maybe professor Oliver's, above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like this may be a great way to address mental health crisis calls and worth further examination.

Denver successfully sent mental health professionals, not police, to hundreds of calls

Another U.S. city is reporting early success with a program that replaces traditional law enforcement responders with health care workers for some emergency calls.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Dog said:

Mugged by reality...the same city council that voted to abolish the police has in the wake of retirements and the resulting crime wave voted to spend $6.4M to hire new police officers.

Minneapolis to spend $6.4M to recruit more police officers | Daily Mail Online

It is true that the police cannot stop disfunction.  The schools lack the tools also.  We need to enable people with jobs.  With work comes self respect.

Who knows dog, even a woman or a puppy might like you if you knew how to find a job.

The cops could be fewer in number and more friendly if the chief didn't let Barney have a bullet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I'm curious.  The title of this thread talks about 'abolishing' the police.  Has anyone here actually responded that they want to get rid of police forces entirely?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Grrr... said:

So I'm curious.  The title of this thread talks about 'abolishing' the police.  Has anyone here actually responded that they want to get rid of police forces entirely?

This is anarchy.  As a political philosophy you should read about the Hay Market Massacre.  In a perfect world, no one needs rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, hasher said:

This is anarchy.  As a political philosophy you should read about the Hay Market Massacre.  In a perfect world, no one needs rules.

I am only very slightly familiar with that.  But I'm really interested if there is actually proof to this narrative that one individual has been so voraciously pushing that there is a large movement, and are people here who want to abolish police entirely.  I haven't seen evidence of it.  Even in anarchy, a liar is a liar.

I suspect, rather, that he's been running with what just a few people say in order to paint an entire political group as radicals.  That would be highly dishonest, but it's what we've come to expect.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Grrr... said:

I am only very slightly familiar with that.  But I'm really interested if there is actually proof to this narrative that one individual has been so voraciously pushing that there are people here who want to abolish police entirely.  I haven't seen evidence of it.  Even in anarchy, a liar is a liar.

There is an autobiography out there.  I think it tended to focus his mind knowing that hanging awaits him.

I admire the police.  I respect them.  Any thing they ask, I will comply.  It is a very difficult job and unfortunately, necessary.

Militarizing the police remains wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, hasher said:

It is true that the police cannot stop disfunction.  The schools lack the tools also.  We need to enable people with jobs.  With work comes self respect.

Who knows dog, even a woman or a puppy might like you if you knew how to find a job.

The cops could be fewer in number and more friendly if the chief didn't let Barney have a bullet.

You're right, “we need to enable people with jobs”. Controlling crime is an absolute prerequisite for the creation of jobs in any community and the police are the institution that provides that condition. Sure there are some bad apples but if we want to reverse the deterioration of our failing communities the last thing we should be doing is defunding the police.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, hasher said:

There is an autobiography out there.  I think it tended to focus his mind knowing that hanging awaits him.

I admire the police.  I respect them.  Any thing they ask, I will comply.  It is a very difficult job and unfortunately, necessary.

Militarizing the police remains wrong.

I agree.  There would a reduced need for weaponizing the police if the criminals weren't weaponized as well.  But unfortunately the same people who oppose de-militarizing (and I'm coming to hate that overly generalized phrase)  also oppose improved firearm control.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dog said:

You're right, “we need to enable people with jobs”. Controlling crime is an absolute prerequisite for the creation of jobs in any community and the police are the institution that provides that condition. Sure there are some bad apples but if we want to reverse the deterioration of our failing communities the last thing we should be doing is defunding the police.

It doesn't begin or end with police or schools.  There are places closing prisons for lack of candidates.  I'd like to see that here.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Grrr... said:

I agree.  There would a reduced need for weaponizing the police if the criminals weren't weaponized as well.  But unfortunately the same people who oppose de-militarizing (and I'm coming to hate that overly generalized phrase)  also oppose improved firearm control.

Come on, surely you want to know that the person next to you in the grocery store is strapping?  It will make you more careful with your shopping cart.  All is good.  There might be a bear or a tiger in the parking lot.  Where is the peace officer then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Controlling Crime' through force of arms is impossible.  If anyone would like proof of that, take a look at any of the many guerilla wars that have been fought (and almost universally LOST) by the larger of the two combatants.

The real way to control crime is through a change in the culture.  That includes stringent gun control (NOT gun removal, but control).

Any talk of controlling crime through force of arms is the same as spanking a child.  Eventually they begin to call your bluff.  How much are you willing to punish?  There's a limit, and the child knows it.  So do the criminals.

How far are people willing to go to 'stop' crimes?  Israel's tried a pretty pro-punishment with the Palestinians.  Have all those guns and rockets and deaths taught them the error of their ways?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Grrr... said:

'Controlling Crime' through force of arms is impossible.  If anyone would like proof of that, take a look at any of the many guerilla wars that have been fought (and almost universally LOST) by the larger of the two combatants.

The real way to control crime is through a change in the culture.  That includes stringent gun control (NOT gun removal, but control).

Any talk of controlling crime through force of arms is the same as spanking a child.  Eventually they begin to call your bluff.  How much are you willing to punish?  There's a limit, and the child knows it.  So do the criminals.

My father was an educator.  He inherited a school with discipline problems.  He organized games.  The problems dissipated.

There was one child who had a mother who replied that her son was possessed by a demon.  You might guess who that demon was. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, hasher said:

Come on, surely you want to know that the person next to you in the grocery store is strapping?  It will make you more careful with your shopping cart.  All is good.  There might be a bear or a tiger in the parking lot.  Where are the peace officer's then?

Well, I'd be careful about phrasing it that way.  I don't think it's right for us to tell other people what they need or don't need.  But I fully support making it as hard as fuck (not expensive - that's two different things) to get a weapon.

I can GET a explosive materials license.  But it's damn hard.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Grrr... said:

'Controlling Crime' through force of arms is impossible.  If anyone would like proof of that, take a look at any of the many guerilla wars that have been fought (and almost universally LOST) by the larger of the two combatants.

The real way to control crime is through a change in the culture.  That includes stringent gun control (NOT gun removal, but control).

Any talk of controlling crime through force of arms is the same as spanking a child.  Eventually they begin to call your bluff.  How much are you willing to punish?  There's a limit, and the child knows it.  So do the criminals.

How far are people willing to go to 'stop' crimes?  Israel's tried a pretty pro-punishment with the Palestinians.  Have all those guns and rockets and deaths taught them the error of their ways?

What about another Apartheid? Think of the possibilities!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sol Rosenberg said:

What about another Apartheid? Think of the possibilities!

Where do you live?  I live on the right side of the tracks and I only cross them for drugs and sex.  Be real.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some people have the cart before the horse.  They believe that you first have to control crime before you can create jobs.  When, in fact, a lack of well paying jobs is one of the driving forces behind crimes.

When more people are employed, fewer people commit crimes.

Very rarely are areas in cities 'recovered' by putting a guy with a rifle on every corner.  Much more often, they are recovered by removing blight, employing the resident, and supply them with ways to make meaningful changes in their communities.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Grrr... said:

Some people have the cart before the horse.  They believe that you first have to control crime before you can create jobs.  When, in fact, a lack of well paying jobs is one of the driving forces behind crimes.

When more people are employed, fewer people commit crimes.

I've been working for 53 years.  When I "retire" , I will find a new occupation.  My ass may be fat, but it is not lazy.  The world is the oyster.  May all of mankind enjoy it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Grrr... said:

The real way to control crime is through a change in the culture.  That includes stringent gun control (NOT gun removal, but control). 

In your dreams, but various "removal" programs are underway in several states. Did you hear the roar of the crowd?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pedagogical Tom said:

In your dreams, but various "removal" programs are underway in several states. Did you hear the roar of the crowd?

 

I don't like guns.  I respect them.  I taught my children to shoot.  We need to know the violence that is inherent in firearms.  We won't save the Republic by toting guns.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, hasher said:

I don't like guns.  I respect them.  I taught my children to shoot.  We need to know the violence that is inherent in firearms.  We won't save the Republic by toting guns.  

Toting, or touting.  Both.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Grrr... said:

Toting, or touting.  Both.

Words are wonderful things.  I wish I was better at the task of expression.

Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Grrr... said:
36 minutes ago, hasher said:

I don't like guns.  I respect them.  I taught my children to shoot.  We need to know the violence that is inherent in firearms.  We won't save the Republic by toting guns.  

Toting, or touting.  Both.

B-b-b-but GOD, GUNZ, and GUTS!

There's a lotta bad guys out there! Bad hombres! The only thing stops a bad guy with a gun is to build a wall!! oh wait, that didn't work out.... the only thing stops a bad guy with a gun is to get rid of police unions that protect bad hombres when they become police officers! No, too long..... wait a minute, I'll have something... how about if we give the bad guys jobs instead of guns?

Worth a try?

- DSK

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Steam Flyer said:

B-b-b-but GOD, GUNZ, and GUTS!

There's a lotta bad guys out there! Bad hombres! The only thing stops a bad guy with a gun is to build a wall!! oh wait, that didn't work out.... the only thing stops a bad guy with a gun is to get rid of police unions that protect bad hombres when they become police officers! No, too long..... wait a minute, I'll have something... how about if we give the bad guys jobs instead of guns?

Worth a try?

- DSK

No.  We give jobs to prison guards.  Get with the problem (program).  I'm sure you don't want to continue...  we have your address.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/2/2021 at 7:34 PM, Pedagogical Tom said:

or maybe professor Oliver's, above.

You need not call me "professor". 

It's usually Your Supreme Highness 

Link to post
Share on other sites

More info here on De-Militarizing the Police - getting rid of the Pentagon's 1033 program. 

(De-funding is almost entirely a bad faith red herring - which we have come to expect from the Dogster) 

(Vets For Peace, not surprisingly, supports the de-militarization of just about everything . . )

Will Biden End the Militarization of Police? -- Interviews Available

 
 
NETFA FREEMAN, netfa@ips-dc.org, @Netfafree
  Hill and Freeman are both on the coordinating committee of the Black Alliance for Peace. Freeman is writing a forthcoming book: Community Control Over Police.
 
  The group recently released a statement calling for an executive order to end the Pentagon's 1033 program, which siphons military equipment to police in the U.S.
 
  The group states: "The gratuitous militarization of police forces across the United States through this program has helped to turn these agencies into brutal weapons of repression. Therefore, nothing short of complete abolition of this program is acceptable.

  "BAP has demanded abolition of the 1033 program since BAP’s 2017 founding. It now asks the public to sign a petition (available in English and Spanish) demanding the Biden administration and Democrats commit to abolishing this racist and brutal program."

  Hill is also executive director of the Mississippi Workers’ Center for Human Rights. She added: “Here in the belly of the Deep South beast, we understand the harsh and irreversible effects measures like 1033 have had and continue to have on those who languish in poverty, forced to live in shanty shacks and tenements." She formerly served as municipal judge for the city of Hollandale and is a human rights attorney and a veteran community organizer.

      The group noted: "The National Defense Authorization Act of 1997 that then-Senator Joe Biden (D-Delaware) supported and President Bill Clinton (D) signed into law created the 1033 program by expanding on a previous program.

  "Responding to outrage about the heavily militarized police response to protests after Michael Brown’s murder in Ferguson, Missouri, President Barack Obama enacted a policy in 2015 that appeared to limit the program, but made little difference in any department’s ability to acquire and use military weapons.

  "Even with the scale-back, the Obama administration managed to transfer a $459 million arsenal to police agencies. ...

  "President Donald Trump came into office and reversed Obama’s cosmetic changes. What the Biden administration is now proposing by reversing Trump’s reversal to the Obama policy is not enough, as reverting the policy to Obama’s altered version is not justice."
 
 
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, AJ Oliver said:

      The group noted: "The National Defense Authorization Act of 1997 that then-Senator Joe Biden (D-Delaware) supported and President Bill Clinton (D) signed into law created the 1033 program by expanding on a previous program.

That's not correct. The program began in 1990 but was expanded (and got the 1033 moniker) in 1997.

It's also worth noting that

Quote

The 1033 program is not the most significant federal source of police militarization, though. The program is dwarfed by Department of Homeland Security anti-terrorism grants to local police, as well as shared revenue from property seizures and forfeitures.

 

6 hours ago, AJ Oliver said:

What the Biden administration is now proposing by reversing Trump’s reversal to the Obama policy is not enough

Are they still in the "proposing" stage on this one? It was three weeks ago that I posted about it and gave Biden what I guess was a premature hat tip on taking at least a baby step to undo an unwise part of his career.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Pedagogical Tom said:

Are they still

Dude, take that up with "The Institute for Public Accuracy", not me. 

I find them to be quite reliable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Grrr... said:

Some people have the cart before the horse.  They believe that you first have to control crime before you can create jobs.  When, in fact, a lack of well paying jobs is one of the driving forces behind crimes.

Would you open a business today in West Baltimore? What do you think your insurance premiums would be?  There will be no investment there until crime is under control and that won't happen as long as the "Defund the Police" crew is running the city.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dog said:

Would you open a business today in West Baltimore? What do you think your insurance premiums would be?  There will be no investment there until crime is under control and that won't happen as long as the "Defund the Police" crew is running the city.

I don't have a clue about West Baltimore.  I can tell you about Hotlanta and the heroin and the women sold on the street.

It is disgusting.

Are you part of the solution?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
On 8/9/2020 at 4:41 PM, Mark K said:

More evidence it's primarily a training issue. The US public is showing disapproval with the Grossman creed of police being justified in anything they wish to do if they can make even a small case that they personally were at risk. All that is done in the pursuit of their mission?  Not working out real real well, that.  It's working on juries, but the case presented to the juries is, essentially, this is how we are trained. 

Speaking of cops and juries,

Police Officers Brutally Beat an Undercover Cop During the St. Louis Protests. A Jury Declined To Hold Them Accountable.
 

Quote

 

In September 2017, St. Louis police officers sought to quell riots in the city after a jury acquitted former officer Jason Stockley for the 2011 killing of Anthony Lamar Smith.

On September 15, a group of cops zeroed in on one protester in particular. They proceeded to beat him, according to an indictment filed against former officers Dustin Boone, Randy Hays, Christopher Myers, and Bailey Colletta, even though the man was not participating in the riots themselves. The cops allegedly shoved him to the ground, struck him with a baton, kicked him in the face, and assaulted him so brutally that he required multiple surgeries. Another officer, Steven Korte, who is still employed by the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, was charged separately.

But the man, Luther Hall, was not actually a protester. He was an undercover police officer dispatched to take down information about property destruction in the city.

...

A jury on Monday declined to convict the three officers—Korte, Myers, and Boone—who pleaded not guilty. Specifically, they acquitted Korte and Myers of deprivation of rights and deadlocked on that count as it pertained to Boone. They also failed to reach a verdict on a charge against Korte for lying to the FBI and on a charge against Myers for destruction of evidence after he allegedly smashed Hall's phone.

Hays, who pleaded guilty to one count of deprivation or rights, testified that he hit Hall repeatedly with his baton and saw Korte kick him in the face. When asked twice if Hall was resisting, he said no. "After hindsight and reflection, I was in the wrong," he said on the stand, according to the local CBS affiliate.

Colletta also pleaded guilty to making false statements to the grand jury.

Text messages in the indictment show some of the officers expressing a mix of glee and satisfaction at the idea of assaulting protesters without consequence.

"It's gonna get IGNORANT tonight!!" reads a message from Boone. "But it's gonna be a lot of fun beating the hell out of these shitheads once the sun goes down and nobody can tell us apart!!!!" He later added that "we really need these fuckers to start acting up so we can have some fun" and that "it's still a blast beating people that deserve it."

"This shit is crazy ……. but it's fucking AWESOME too!" Boone wrote the day after he allegedly attacked Hall. He added unironically: "Except for cops getting hurt. People on the streets got FUCKED UP!"

On October 5, with some civil unrest still ongoing, Hays tried to share some strategy with the overeager Boone. "Remember were [sic] are in south city," wrote Hays. "They support us but also cameras. So make sure you have an old white dude as a witness." Hall is black.

...

 

Not sure what the jury was told but I hope it was NOT that standard training requires lying to the FBI or smashing phones.

Sounds like Boone already achieved his goal of getting ignorant. Also sounds like Hays is the more dangerous cop.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Shambolic Tom said:

Speaking of cops and juries,

Police Officers Brutally Beat an Undercover Cop During the St. Louis Protests. A Jury Declined To Hold Them Accountable.
 

Not sure what the jury was told but I hope it was NOT that standard training requires lying to the FBI or smashing phones.

Sounds like Boone already achieved his goal of getting ignorant. Also sounds like Hays is the more dangerous cop.

I think they had a damn good lawyer. Managed to slyly convince the jury this is blue-on-blue crime and it was handled internally. Probably mentioned that officer Hall will never have to work another day in his life and it's possible Hall himself showed no hatred towards the officers when he was on the stand. Coached his boys to show embarrassment and excruciating contrition for what they've done and insinuate it's a lesson they will never evereverevereversohelpmegod make again. That part is probably true too. Let the jury know that when it comes to groups fighting it's always a frat. Locker room talk abounds. Have you ever seriously prepared to do and receive real violence with a bunch of other men? Not in theory, not tomorrow...today...like within the hour or next few minutes? Maybe (of course!) not, but we've all seen those scenes from the movies. All American good ol' boys yakking about "...gettin' some". Not that far from an NRA convention, really.     

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/3/2021 at 2:36 PM, Mark K said:

Let the jury know that when it comes to groups fighting it's always a frat. Locker room talk abounds. Have you ever seriously prepared to do and receive real violence with a bunch of other men? Not in theory, not tomorrow...today...like within the hour or next few minutes?

This line of thought seems more appropriate for soldiers than cops to me. They're supposed to be there to fight only if they must. I doubt there was any pressing need to beat up officer Hall. He was beaten because people like Boone think it's "fucking awesome" that "People on the streets got FUCKED UP!"

And the cops seemed to know that heading out to pummel and sever is not heading out to protect and serve. Although Boothe seems to have achieved ignorance, he did know enough to wait until "the sun goes down and nobody can tell us apart!!!"

Hays seemed to have a better-developed consciousness of guilt, saying, "Remember were [sic] are in south city," wrote Hays. "They support us but also cameras. So make sure you have an old white dude as a witness."

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Shambolic Tom said:

This line of thought seems more appropriate for soldiers than cops to me. They're supposed to be there to fight only if they must. I doubt there was any pressing need to beat up officer Hall. He was beaten because people like Boone think it's "fucking awesome" that "People on the streets got FUCKED UP!"

And the cops seemed to know that heading out to pummel and sever is not heading out to protect and serve. Although Boothe seems to have achieved ignorance, he did know enough to wait until "the sun goes down and nobody can tell us apart!!!"

Hays seemed to have a better-developed consciousness of guilt, saying, "Remember were [sic] are in south city," wrote Hays. "They support us but also cameras. So make sure you have an old white dude as a witness."

 

 You've parsed my statement to make explanation appear to be advocacy there, Thesaurus Tom. I think you just want to argue. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Mark K said:

 You've parsed my statement to make explanation appear to be advocacy there, Thesaurus Tom. I think you just want to argue. 

Which is why I never respond to any of his posts. Ever.  Ever being since a time a couple of years ago when he managed to get me pissed off and then posted those quotes everywhere incessantly.

Dogballs.

Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, d'ranger said:

Which is why I never respond to any of his posts. Ever.  Ever being since a time a couple of years ago when he managed to get me pissed off and then posted those quotes everywhere incessantly.

Dogballs.

I've chased him down one of his rabbit holes, way too often.  Starts off reasonable.  Then, he plays some insipid "gotcha" and tries to nail you down to a position against which he wants to argue.  Meanwhile, apologizes for Koch $ponsored cheerleading and links to one of his many threads in an attempt to impress you with how awesome he is.

Not worth the electrons inconvenienced.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

I've chased him down one of his rabbit holes, way too often.  Starts off reasonable.  Then, he plays some insipid "gotcha" and tries to nail you down to a position against which he wants to argue.  Meanwhile, apologizes for Koch $ponsored cheerleading and links to one of his many threads in an attempt to impress you with how awesome he is.

Not worth the electrons inconvenienced.

 

And if you’re lucky he will stalk you outside of PA.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Mark K said:

 You've parsed my statement to make explanation appear to be advocacy there, Thesaurus Tom. I think you just want to argue. 

Not my intent. The part of your explanation that I quoted just doesn't seem to apply to cops to me. Well, not good cops anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Shambolic Tom said:

Not my intent. The part of your explanation that I quoted just doesn't seem to apply to cops to me. Well, not good cops anyway.

What is your intent? 

Yo, after nine years of intercourse, I regret meeting you...and I loathe libertarians. 

 

Tom and Taney.JPG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...