Jump to content

Bieker rudder on a J/111?


Recommended Posts

Heard it's been done.  Recon is now sporting one.  Anyone know anything about it?  

We've been discussing a rudder upgrade.  4 of the 6 boats in our region have already replaced their rudders.  I believe 3 of them still have the same blade configuration.  

Having raced our J/111 for a year now, I can see the appeal of a different blade shape.  

FWIW, looks like it was a 3 sec/mile hit in PHRF.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

First post yay!

Here is my understanding of the rudder changes from talking briefly with someone close to the situation:

1: the rudder post and bearing were substantially under designed and break chronically across most j/111. J boats offers an upgraded bearing/post package that fits in the old profile increasing its diameter from ~80mm to ~82.  The boat owner wants to potentially race off shore and wanted a much stronger setup. The new PB designed rudder is ~100mm.

I have heard of similar poor quality in foil shape on j/boat keel fairing/alignment in other of their production boats, so this seems reasonable.

2: the stock j/111 rudder profile was pretty underwhelming with the maximum camber at around 50% of chord length. This has been brought more inline with a NACA section around 30%. I don’t know the specifics of how much the chord/camber ratios have also been adjusted. But as PB is a foil and hydrodynamic expert, quite possibly a lot. I do know the foil’s overall taper was changed.

3: the Stock rudder is also being retrofitted to work with the new bearing setup  to revert it to the one design blade. not sure if the setup would still qualify in one design, but as it would be the original blade, just a essentially reinforced bearing and post, I would guess it would probably be allowed?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Before doing such an upgrade I would ask for underpinning VPP (or other sound) numbers.

Likely such upgrade are like in high end audio:  many times it's just snake oil sold by a sleek marketing story while in reality there is zero difference. And if many other cases such "upgrades" make the product to perform even worse.  But as the owner paid a lot of money for it he will of course report that the upgrade is substantial and that he is very happy with it.

So therefore: ask for some objective proof that it is indeed an improvement.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/28/2021 at 10:58 PM, longbeachsailor said:

really kills much chance of a local one design fleet forming. Does this design really improve much of the boats controllability/performance offshore? 

I guess if you have no aspirations of sailing one-design, that would be OK.  Unless you keep both rudders and swap them out.  Seems like overkill to me.

Hroth

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/29/2021 at 12:19 PM, Snowden said:

for real boatyard bragging rights you need one of these Bieker rudders:

RudderTubercles.jpg

Only if you fit razor blades between the tubercules to cut the weed..

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/29/2021 at 6:53 AM, ZeeZee said:

Before doing such an upgrade I would ask for underpinning VPP (or other sound) numbers.

Likely such upgrade are like in high end audio:  many times it's just snake oil sold by a sleek marketing story while in reality there is zero difference. And if many other cases such "upgrades" make the product to perform even worse.  But as the owner paid a lot of money for it he will of course report that the upgrade is substantial and that he is very happy with it.

So therefore: ask for some objective proof that it is indeed an improvement.

go back and research how many 111's have lost their rudders offshore, and you'll quickly come to the conclusion that any rudder is an improvement over the original design, even if its just the post/bearings that are upgraded.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/28/2021 at 6:19 PM, SoggySeattleSailor said:

: the Stock rudder is also being retrofitted to work with the new bearing setup  to revert it to the one design blade.

 

On 6/28/2021 at 8:58 PM, longbeachsailor said:

really kills much chance of a local one design fleet forming

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/29/2021 at 3:30 AM, sinker said:

only a little different AM-JKLVjpxIZApWhJ084PDGxkG9AJPYj4UHdgd51zGTEHYgG1WZoQYKuZPz33Esb9iVm3c0VkyfJbj2i-Ex-XdRoy1gx5vRbVZ5Ya-QCgWnKAw31gwny5YObXaQIuYv26qD3Z-wADBDUGXHcDfxWQ-dAMThCJQ=w370-h657-no?authuser=0

Areas seem to be similar. Most obvious difference is a higher aspect ratio which also increases the bending moment and thus requires strengthening the post. The balance has been changed as well with the post positioned further aft. An interesting feature is the slight sweep of the tip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The foil section also appears to be much narrower making it less draggy, however generating less lift at higher angles of attack.  

Almost looks like the profile 63-009 compared to 65-021.

~1/3 reduction of drag based on the graph and not a large impact on lift until extreme AOA.

it sounds like the post would have needed to be increased substantially even on the old shape, as they were under sized.  
 

the balance and placement of the post is also an interesting change to point out. As the aspect ratio of a foil increases, the distance from the leading edge to the venture of pressure also increases. Moving the post back adjusts for this, keeping the post more in line with the center of pressure and thus balanced. 

Also interesting is that it appears camber max is moving forward on chord length as deeper on the foil. I would hazard here that the sweep and camber reduction further reduce the generation of tip vortices and their drag effectively further improving aspect ratio and drag reduction.

(Images below are from principles of yacht design)

FF1184F6-D145-4F1E-A04C-FB70956288E3.jpeg

F1A269EA-021B-4A1D-8654-333591C2B37E.jpeg

AACF4242-0C79-4A2D-B253-A8C627883A18.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 months later...
On 6/28/2021 at 7:58 PM, longbeachsailor said:

really kills much chance of a local one design fleet forming. Does this design really improve much of the boats controllability/performance offshore? 

We have 7 J/111's in the PNW.  Only the latest arrival has OD sails.  Everyone else has larger mains and spins, possibly larger jibs too.  OD isn't happening around here.  We can have some great fleet racing though, but at present the boats rate from 39 to 48.  I expect the 48 will go to 45 soonish.  We'll have 5 111's on the line next week for the first time in the PNW.  That should be very good fun.

Our new rudder is on order.  Hoping to stick in in January.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, pironiero said:

Hey guys, i have a question, are J boats capable of planing?

Mine sure is. I believe it is model specific up to reasonable levels of wind. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pironiero said:

Which one you've got?

J/88. I know most of the recent J's will plane in winds under 20 kts, some lower than others. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

huh, im struggling to understand what are the pros and cons of Jboat in comparacing with something like SF3300, can you please explain?

hull shapes are so different...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pardon me, pironiero, but would you mind starting a thread with your question?  You are asking possibly the most general question ever about J Boats, in perhaps the most specific thread ever.  This is a thread about one single thing.  The J/111 rudder.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Roleur said:

Pardon me, pironiero, but would you mind starting a thread with your question?  You are asking possibly the most general question ever about J Boats, in perhaps the most specific thread ever.  This is a thread about one single thing.  The J/111 rudder.  

okay, sorry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I'll play along here.  The VPP doesn't show any windspeeds near 17 knots?  I see 20 knots of WIND SPEED on the table you just linked.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Roleur said:

Okay, I'll play along here.  The VPP doesn't show any windspeeds near 17 knots?  I see 20 knots of WIND SPEED on the table you just linked.  

You are saying the boat goes 17Knts at 17kns of windspeed? Fastest I see at 16knts is 9.95

 

image.png.cba36a683b00ef70671eff538b84126b.png

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No.  No one said the boat goes 17 knots in 17 knots of wind speed.  They said the boat planes at 17 knots of wind speed.  No reference to boat speeds has been mentioned.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

That said, plenty of J/111's have seen over 20 knots of boat speed.  Of course, that was done in over 20 knots of wind speed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, solosailor said:

The J/111 certainly planes in wind above 20k and will hit high teens/low 20s peak boat speed when it's really howling.

Still waiting for the right conditions to try this! It looked like that would be yesterday, but the RC cancelled the race last Thursday when the wind forecast hit 33 kts sustained and gusts about 40. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...