Jump to content

No More Radioactive Waste In Road Building

Recommended Posts

Sunday, Jul 11, 2021
BRADENTON — The Biden administration recently announced it is withdrawing approval that had been given by the Trump administration to use phosphogypsum in construction. The retracted approval had allowed the use of toxic, radioactive waste in constructing roads in parts of the United States prone to sinkholes and erosion.
"Allowing phosphogypsum in roads was a boneheaded, short-sighted favor to the industry," said Jaclyn Lopez, Florida director at the Center for Biological Diversity. "While the withdrawal cites technical deficiencies in the applicant’s petition, this action is consistent with 30 years of science showing that phosphogypsum poses a substantial risk to humans and the environment."
Phosphogypsum is the radioactive waste of fertilizer production. Phosphate ore, mined largely in Florida, is transported to fertilizer plants for processing by chemically digesting the ore in sulfuric acid. For every ton of phosphoric acid produced, the fertilizer industry creates five tons of radioactive phosphogypsum waste.
I guess now Mosaic, the phosphate mining upstream on the Peace River, which feeds into Charlotte Harbor and subsequently into the Gulf, will have to find a new way to get rid of their "slightly radioactive" waste.
Glowing fish could make it easier to find the fish at night.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Check this one out. Radio active waste used in road construction linked back to the Manhattan Project in Niagara Falls.





The first hint of radioactive waste near John Grace’s home in Lewiston came from his son who carried a radiation meter for his government job. The meter would beep every time his son drove over the gravel driveway.

“He said ‘something’s not right here,’ ” said Grace, who lives at 738 Upper Mountain Road.

Turns out, he was right.

Gravel in the driveway was first tested some 40 years ago by the federal Department of Energy and found to have radiation levels some 70 times greater than what’s found in the local natural environment. The driveway was still hot when tested again three years ago by the Environmental Protection Agency.

John Grace

John Grace

“I just said ‘you’ve got to be kidding me,’” Grace said. “They said it was all around Niagara County.”

Indeed, this radioactive material is prevalent throughout the region.

Government documents show that state health and environmental officials have known for almost four decades that at least 60 properties throughout Niagara County and Grand Island, including the driveway near Grace’s home, are contaminated with radioactive material that resembles gravel. The radioactivity at these properties ranges from three to more than 70 times what people are naturally exposed to in the local environment, according to state and federal documents.

“We found it in the front of driveways or underneath driveways. We found it in flower beds around people’s homes, we found it in between two adjoining properties in the soil where kids play,” said Brian Stamm, an attorney with the Stamm Law firm, who is investigating the problem with other attorneys and environmental engineers.

“The levels we have seen in some of our investigative testing and some of our site inspections are well above and beyond what would be qualified as a threshold for clean up,” Stamm said.

Authorities are addressing two other properties not on the original list of about 60 properties. The EPA said it will remove contaminated waste from a parking lot shared by a bowling alley and building supply store off Niagara Falls Boulevard in Niagara Falls and will assess whether to clean hotspots at a cemetery off Roberts Avenue in Lewiston.

It’s difficult to know what, if anything, federal and state officials are doing about the balance of the 60 properties, as state officials refused interview requests from Investigative Post and the EPA would only make available a staff member who said he didn’t know the answers to most of the questions posed to him.

The state health department said in a statement that a panel of experts concluded in 1980 that the radioactive material did not pose a significant enough risk to warrant immediate removal.

Listen to our radio version of this story broadcast on WBFO

Although the exposure to the radioactive waste does not pose an immediate health risk, the EPA and the National Academy of Sciences have concluded there is no safe level of radiation.

Furthermore, the group of attorneys and environmental engineers investigating some of the contaminated properties in Niagara County disagree with the state’s position that the waste does not pose a significant risk.

“Is it harmful? Absolutely,” said John Horn, an environmental attorney with Harter Secrest & Emery in Buffalo.

“Even though it may not be at a Superfund level, these levels we’re finding on these property owners’ homes is at such a significant level that it absolutely has to be cleaned up and removed,” added Stamm, the attorney collaborating with Horn.

Radioactive hotspots identified

This story is based on a review of more than 8,000 pages of government documents requested under the Freedom of Information Law, property inspections with a radiation detector, and interviews with more than a dozen experts, attorneys, residents and government officials.

The federal Department of Energy and state Department of Health identified 100 hot-spots in Niagara County and Grand Island almost four decades ago. The federal government cleaned up about a third of the properties after determining the radioactive waste was linked to nuclear weapons development through the Manhattan Project. The remaining contaminated properties were left untouched at the time because the federal government believed the material was linked to commercial metallurgical companies, which have since closed.

Zoom in and move the map to find locations. Click the red circles to get property’s maximum radiation reading. For mobile phone users, click the double arrows on the lower right corner of map to see map in full size. Map prepared by Orbitist and Dan Telvock. 

The Army Corps of Engineers has determined the radioactive waste generated by the metallurgical industry was “cheap and plentiful” to anyone who wanted it for gravel to construct roads, driveways and parking lots.

“It was a byproduct that no one wanted to store anymore,” said Lewiston Town Board Member Alfonso Bax. “Which makes you concerned about: how many people took advantage of this bargain?”

Radioactive material is found in locations beyond the 100 originally identified in the federal survey some 40 years ago, including roads and former industrial sites.

Greenpac Mill filed a $50 million lawsuit in 2013 against National Grid, Occidental Chemical Corp. and Kimberly-Clark Corp. after finding 20,000 tons of radioactive soil while constructing its facility on Royal Avenue in Niagara Falls. The lawsuit was settled out of court.

There may yet be more hotspots.

“We don’t know the full extent of the footprint,” said Horn, one of the attorneys investigating contaminated properties. “We have studied documents that suggest that the radioactive slag – and that’s a general term – is present significantly throughout Niagara County from the Falls stretching to Grand Island and Lewiston.”

Most contaminated properties

The state in 2013 sent the EPA a list of the most contaminated properties they were aware of to determine if they qualified for cleanup under the federal Superfund program.

Those properties include a parking lot shared by Rapids Bowling Center and Greater Niagara Building Center off Niagara Falls Boulevard, Holy Trinity Cemetery at 5401 Roberts Ave. in Lewiston, and the driveway adjacent to the 738 Upper Mountain Road house owned by Grace.

The EPA determined none of the properties qualified as Superfund sites. But the agency agreed to continue assessing the bowling alley and cemetery to determine if the waste should be removed.

State officials had previously raised concerns about the bowling alley and building supply store site. For example, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority officials wrote in a May 24, 1979, letter that “the material should be removed” from the parking lot.

Minutes from a May 24, 1979, meeting between the then-owners of the bowling alley and the adjacent building, which was at the time a Pontiac dealership, demonstrated the mixed messages the property owners would get over the years from state officials.

“The group expressed a concern over the fact that one agency had almost closed their doors, another had told them no problem, and the NYS Health Department was now saying something in between these two previous extremes,” the minutes state. “It was obvious from the discussion that there was a definite doubt in their minds as to who knew what they were doing.”

From September 2006 through July 2013, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and state health officials conducted radiological surveys that found radiation high enough in the office and warehouse at the building supply store to recommend employees avoid the areas. In addition, officials found the parking lot and a marshy area behind the buildings had radiation readings between 55 and 80 times what people are naturally exposed to in the area.

Despite this contamination, the former property owner of the bowling alley and building supply store violated a state health directive by digging into the parking lot at least twice without any penalty from the state.

In 2001, the owner removed underground fuel tanks buried under the parking lot, prompting a written rebuke from the state health department. In 2006, the owner hired crews that scraped a section of the parking lot, leaving behind a pile of radioactive stone and soils with readings more than 60 times what is naturally in the local environment, according to a DEC field investigation report.

DEC becomes aware of potential exposures in 2006.

DEC becomes aware of potential exposures at the parking lot in 2006.

“In 2006, DOH was informed after the fact that excavation occurred,” the Department of Health emailed in a prepared statement. “The property owner did not seek, nor did DOH grant, permission to pave over the existing parking lot.”

The owner of the property at the time of the incidents is deceased and the current owner did not respond to requests for interviews.

The EPA has determined the parking lot and adjoining land, which totals about 4 acres, contains material that in spots is 176 to 650 times more radioactive than what is naturally found in nearby soils that are not contaminated.

“The majority of the parking lot will have to be removed,” said Eric Daly, the on-scene coordinator for the EPA. The estimated cleanup cost could exceed $7 million.

But DEC officials contested Daly’s assessment, according to a series of emails from last year. Specifically, a radiation specialist with the DEC emailed Daly that removing almost four acres of contaminated ground two-feet deep seemed “extreme.”

“It is better to be more conservative and worst case than to underestimate,” Daly emailed Jerry Riggi, the DEC’s radiation specialist, on Oct. 7, 2015.

“Is this extreme? I wouldn’t call it that.”

Cemetery concerns

The contamination at Holy Trinity Cemetery in Lewiston totals about three acres adjoining the gravesites. State and county officials measured radiation at the field in excess of 75 times normal readings.

State and county officials were made aware as early as 2006 that children played on the contaminated field, according to a site survey report by the DEC.

“They’re at risk and they are exposed every minute that they are out over this land,” said Stamm, one of the attorneys investigating contamination complaints.

At the same time, state officials learned that a pile of contaminated material noted in 1980 near the groundskeeper’s office had disappeared. Although no one is certain what happened to the waste, the Department of Health said “it appears that the small piles of slag first observed in a 1980 DOH survey were moved to a back area of the cemetery.”

Screen Shot 2016-07-05 at 10.39.48 AM

DEC's 2006 field investigation report details the potential exposures to groundskeepers and children.

DEC’s 2006 field investigation details potential exposures to groundskeepers and children.

In addition, the DEC site visit report states that groundskeepers said they unknowingly drove lawnmowers over contaminated rock with radioactive material 100 to 1,600 times greater than normal readings.

“They asked if breathing the dust could be harmful,” the notes state. “It was suggested … that they try to avoid these areas with the mowers.”

Despite the state’s assertion that the waste poses no significant risk, the EPA fenced in the contaminated three acres in April until further assessments are completed.

EPA fenced in contaminated land at Holy Trinity in April

EPA fenced in contaminated land at Holy Trinity Cemetery in Lewiston in April. 

The Diocese of Buffalo declined an interview request, but said in a prepared statement that, “we expect the EPA to make sure the site is properly remediated.”

The driveway used by Grace on Upper Mountain Road, but owned by another party, is not getting the same attention, but it is equally as hot.

A summary prepared for the EPA indicates that almost 1,500 square feet of the driveway and vacant lawn near his home is contaminated. An Investigative Post reporter armed with a gamma radiation detection device found spots on the driveway in excess of 50 times background levels.

“Before, it was looking like someone was going to take care of it, then they went away and I’ve never heard from them again,” Grace said.

Other properties not addressed

The EPA is prepared to remove the waste from the parking lot off Niagara Falls Boulevard and will further assess the cemetery property. The EPA is also requesting information from at least one company that may be responsible for some of the radioactive material.

But neither the driveway adjacent to Grace’s home nor the other 60 residential and commercial properties that may be contaminated are on the cleanup list. And it’s unclear whether current property owners are aware of the radiation.

The contaminated residential and commercial properties identified decades ago are spread all over the region, including sites on:

  • Ridge, Creek and Upper Mountain roads in Lewiston.
  • Grand Island Boulevard in the Grand Island-Tonawanda area.
  • Military, Lewiston, Porter and Portage roads and Buffalo Avenue in the Niagara Falls area.

State health officials said “it is unclear if all property owners were contacted directly at the time” of tests conducted in the 1970s, but noted “press conferences, press releases and news articles” between 1978 and 1980.

But the attorneys who are investigating the contamination said most of the property owners they’ve approached told them they were unaware of the contamination.

“For a good number of the folks that we’ve talked to, it is a surprise,” said Horn, with Harter Secrest & Emery in Buffalo.

Grace said he had planned to construct a new roof on his house to prepare it for sale.

“My concern is now: can I sell this place? And I don’t think so,” he said.

Horn said he has heard similar concerns from other residents.

“There is no question that the economic harm is of huge concern to the individuals we’ve met with up in the affected neighborhoods,” he said.

Neither state nor federal officials would comment on the remaining some 60 properties, including the contamination near Grace’s home, that are not scheduled for cleanups or further assessments.

“We know the way the government moves, very slow. They’ll outwait me,” Grace said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I didn't read an article in the paper this morning reporting Biden ending the use of radioactive materials in the building of roads, I would have never known this was happening.  What else are our self-serving politicians allowing that pose a danger to the public?  And all for profit of their major donors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why Republicans (and no doubt a few crooked Democrats) profited from the Trump clown show.    They could do anything they wanted, as long as it was hidden under the week’s squirrel distraction,    It was predictable that Trump would either threaten to do something unconstitutional or accuse a rival of doing something illegal, just to see how it polled.   That allowed those in power the cover to do stuff like this.    They didn’t even have to give Trump a cut.   He is a self distracting auto distraction generator. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not just radioactivity.  Local power utility was selling a byproduct of coal and pet coke fuels used in their steam turbine boilers called "EZBase"  It was to be used in lieu of lime rock as a base for asphalt road construction.  After it was pushed out and installed in numerous places, including used without asphalt top courses through wetlands, it was found to be leaching toxins to the groundwater.  It went from being a "product" to a hazardous waste that had to be hauled to lined landfills at high costs. It basically shut down a relatively new powerplant (along with higher coal and pet coke prices).

The former hunt club adjacent to my home used it to construct their trail roads through the wetlands.   The utility was forced to remove the material from other wetlands but for some reason, not this one.  Of course the utility now owns the property and is planning an 800 acre solar farm for it.  I am on a shallow well.  Good thing I am old enough where something else will probably kill me before my water does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Radiation scares make for easy sensational journalism. "55 times background levels..." or "100 times background levels." They strenuously avoid giving the actual readings in rem or millirem because the public doesn't care enough to contextualize radiation exposure and it would ruin the drama of the story. A Geiger counter is an incredibly sensitive instrument which covers a range of tens of orders of magnitude. They also only ever tell us the single most radioactive spots they measure, or relative to the "local environment" which may constitute sub-millirem levels.


Our yearly average exposure is 621 millirem, of which only 3% is from terrestrial background radiation according to the EPA. The EPA is cited also in these articles saying there is "no safe level of radiation", which is true but misleading without contextualizing the actual exposure relative to background levels. Yes, 1 millirem's extra exposure yearly from your driveway is theoretically "bad" for you. But you are more deeply harmed by walking through a cloud of cigarette smoke, or going for a walk on a street with lots of diesel buses. The scale of the risk from a tiny increase in overall radiation exposure is tiny compared to other much more "normalized" risks like driving or drinking. This is the same thing right wing media does with breathless coverage of crime without mentioning that overall crime levels have plummeted since the 80's.


Of course, none of this is to say that these people won't struggle to sell these houses, or that it wasn't wrong that it wasn't disclosed to these people what was going on when the driveways were built. People are afraid of what they don't understand, but when you choose to not understand you are choosing to fear. I guarantee that there are coal plants within 50 miles of these "radioactive" homes which pose a 50x greater risk in terms of developing cancer in a single year than all background radiation exposure, driveway or no, but nobody considers that when buying a home...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Commercial Boater said:

Radiation scares make for easy sensational journalism. "55 times background levels..." or "100 times background levels." They strenuously avoid giving the actual readings in rem or millirem because the public doesn't care enough to contextualize radiation exposure and it would ruin the drama of the story. A Geiger counter is an incredibly sensitive instrument which covers a range of tens of orders of magnitude. They also only ever tell us the single most radioactive spots they measure, or relative to the "local environment" which may constitute sub-millirem levels.


One thing I remember from my "health physics" class so many years ago is that there is no such thing as a "safe" level of radiation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...